DOCSLIB.ORG

Mapping International Responses to the Political Crisis in Belarus 01 What Is Happening in Belarus? 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mapping International Responses to the Political Crisis in Belarus 01 What Is Happening in Belarus? 3 Mapping International Responses to the Political Crisis in Belarus 01 What is happening in Belarus? 3 02 What is the project about? 6 03 What are sanctions? 8 04 What are the types of sanctions? 10 05 What sanctions against Belarus are currently in place? 15 06 What other international respon- ses are in place, besides sanctions? 22 07 What has been the response of the Belarusian de facto leadership? 26 08 What has been the reaction of civil society and alter- native democratic forces? 28 In August 2020 protests erupted in Belarus, following an allegedly rigged presidential election. Police brutality and political persecu- tion continue to date. International actors adopt various responses to the political and human rights crisis, including sanctions. As representatives of civil society, we are deeply concerned with the current political crisis unfolding in Belarus. By mapping inter- national responses to the crisis, we explore the toolbox used by various actors to ensure accountability and inspire change. The project’s goal is to monitor, document, and analyse international responses, seeking to clarify their complex nature to the general public, as well as to inform advocacy efforts. What is happening in Belarus? Belarus has been under the rule of Alexander Lukashenko1 since 1994. Originally authorised to serve for two presidential terms, Lukashenko initiated two referen- da on amending the constitution in 1996 and 2004. The contested outcomes of the referenda allowed him to run for the post indefinitely and widened the extent of presidential powers, effectively turning Belarus into a presidential republic.2 Lukashenko’s presidency has been marked by authoritarianism and oppression. The allegations against the regime range from state-sponsored and politically motivated murders3 to routine election fraud.4 Although crackdowns on dissent and political persecution have been common during Lukashenko’s rule,5 the re- gime’s response to peaceful demonstrations has arguably been the most brutal in 2020. The largest protests in Belarusian post-Soviet history erupted following the 2020 presidential election. The announcement of a landslide victory for Lukashenko contrasted with ample evidence of electoral fraud,6 and mobilised Belarusians to take their demands for free and fair elections to the streets. The continued vio- lent crackdown on peaceful protesters, manifest in the first days of protests7 and still ongoing,8 transformed the agenda of the demonstrators, now demanding 1 Hereinafter, the names of key figures are transliterated from the Russian language. The read- er may encounter other spellings of names in sources using Belarusian transliteration. 2 Artyom Shraibman, Belarusian Constitution: An Obituary on Democracy, BelarusDigest, 25 March 2013. 3 Belarus: How death squads targeted opposition politicians, DW, 1 December 2019. 4 OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report, Presidential Election in the Republic of Belarus, 11 October 2015, https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/0/0/218981.pdf; OSCE/ ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report, Presidential Election in the Republic of Belarus, 19 December 2010, https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/6/4/75713.pdf; OSCE/ODIHR Elec- tion Observation Mission Final Report, Presidential Election in the Republic of Belarus, 19 March 2006, https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/4/c/19395.pdf; OSCE/ODIHR Election Observa- tion Mission Final Report, Presidential Election in the Republic of Belarus, 9 September 2001, https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/4/c/19395.pdf. 5 C. J. Chivers, Belarus Protest Dispersed as Police Arrest Hundreds, The New York Times, 24 March 2006; Tom Parfitt,Belarus protests: more than 600 charged and opposition leaders in jail, The Guardian, 21 December 2010; Belarus protests: Hundreds arrested after defying ban, BBC, 25 March 2017. 6 Falsifications at every third polling station: “Golos” questioned the results of election in Be- larus, announced by the Central Electoral Commission / Фальсификации на трети участков: «Голос» поставил под сомнение результаты выборов в Беларуси, объявленные ЦИК, Cur- rent Time/ Настоящее Время, 11 August 2020; Kostya Manenkov and Daria Litvinova, Belarus poll workers describe fraud in Aug. 9 election, The Washington Post, 1 September 2020; OSCE, Wolfgang Benedek, OSCE Rapporteur’s Report under the Moscow Mechanism on Alleged Human Rights Violations related to the Presidential Elections of 9 August 2020 in Belarus, 29 October 2020, p. 21. 7 Belarus: Police unleash appalling violence on peaceful protesters, Amnesty International, 10 August 2020; Belarus: Violence, Abuse in Response to Election Protests, Human Rights Center Viasna, 12 August 2020; Second night of protests: Police violence, more injuries, death con- firmed, Human Rights Center Viasna, 11 August 2020; “They did not allow me to see my son’s body.” A 25-year old died following detention in Homel / «Мне адмовіліся паказваць цела сына». У Гомлі пасьля затрыманьня памёр 25-гадовы хлопец, RadioFreeEurope / RadioLiber- ty, 12 August 2020; International Committee for the Investigation of Torture in Belarus, Mass torture in Belarus 2020, First interim report: state response and measures taken to investigate mass torture on 9-13 August 2020. 8 ‘The World Should Not Ignore Systematic Torture in Belarus’, The Economist, 5 December 2020; International Committee for the Investigation of Torture in Belarus, Mass torture in Bela- 3 not only a new election but also an end to killings, torture, and political persecu- tion of peaceful protesters. The demands of protesters have not been met so far. The human rights situation in Belarus continues to deteriorate, as demonstrated by data from local human rights defenders, as well as international bodies. Belarusian Political Crisis in Numbers (as of March 2021) People killed as a result of alleged state-sponsored violence 89 People arrested since 9 August 2020 30 000–32 00010 Political prisoners 29911 People facing criminal charges on politically motivated grounds 90012 People reporting torture 200013 Arrest and detention are not the only instruments in the toolbox of repression. There are also numerous cases of people fired from work,14 expelled from uni- versities,15 or threatened with deprivation of parental rights.16 Lawyers’ licenses and journalists’ accreditations are revoked.17 Businesses are forced to close or rus 2020, Second Interim Report: Detention, Conditions of Detention and Treatment of Detain- ees in September–November 2020. 9 Tsikhanouskaya state that 8 people were killed during the protests. Who are they? / Тихановская заявила, что за время протестов убиты 8 человек. О ком она?, Telegraph.by, 19 November 2020. 10 Total number of people detained during protests exceeded 30 thousand / Общее число задержанных за время протестов превысило 30 тысяч человек, Nasha Niva, 22 November 2020. 11 List of Political Prisoners, Human Rights Center Viasna, 5 December 2020 12 OHCHR, Intersessional meeting of the Human Rights Council - The situation in Belarus, Statement by Michelle Bachelet, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, 4 December 2020. 13 Ibid. 14 ‘After Yesterday’s Protests Factory Workers are Fired in Belarus / После вчерашних протестов в Беларуси начали увольнять заводчан’, Onliner.by, 27 October 2020; Tatsiana Nevedomskaya, ‘Lukashenko’s Revenge? Why Historians are Fired in Belarus?’ / Лукашенко мстит? За что в Беларуси увольняют историков, DW, 21 November 2020; Denis Martinovich, ‘Nesvizh Museum Director Fired. A White-red-white Flag was Raised on the Museum’s Building in Summer’ / Уволен директор Несвижского музея Сергей Климов. Летом на здании появился БЧБ-флаг, TUT.by, 9 December 2020. 15 ‘Belarusian Students Complain of Expulsions after Joining Opposition Strike’, Reuters, 28 October 2020. 16 Tatsiana Nevedomskaya, ‘Why Belarusians take Children to Protests Despite the Threats Parental Rights Deprivation’ / Почему белорусы берут на протесты детей, несмотря на угрозы лишить их родительских прав, DW, 21 September 2020. 17 ‘Joint Letter on Revocation Licenses of Aliaksandr Pylchanka and Yulia Levanchuk’, Lawyers for Lawyers and the Law Society of England and Wales, 3 November 2020; ‘Belarus Cancels all Accreditation for Foreign Journalists’, DW, 2 October 2020. 4 relocate.18 The crisis continues to worsen, and the pressure continues to mount. Belaru- sian citizens bear the cost of authoritarian political ambitions. Their life, liberty, and economic well-being are under constant threat. Political crackdown has not weakened or subsided since August 2020. Both close attention to the situation in Belarus as well as solidarity with Belarusian people are still sorely needed. 18 ‘At Least 12 IT Companies In Belarus Are Relocating, More Are Considering’, BelarusFeed, 29 August 2020; Jurgita Lapienytė, ‘Are Tech Companies Leaving Belarus?’, Cybernews, 26 Au- gust 2020. 5 What is the project about? As representatives of civil society, we are deeply concerned with the current political crisis unfolding in Belarus. By mapping international responses to the crisis, we explore the toolbox used by various actors to ensure accountability and inspire change. The project’s goal is to monitor, document, and analyse international responses, seeking to clarify their complex nature to the general public, as well as to inform advocacy efforts. We do not intend to rank international responses based on their effectiveness or formulate a ‘one size fits all’ strategy for handling the crisis. We welcome all steps taken by local
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heads of State Heads of Government Ministers For
    UNITED NATIONS HEADS OF STATE Protocol and Liaison Service HEADS OF GOVERNMENT PUBLIC LIST MINISTERS FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS COUNTRY HEAD OF STATE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AFGHANISTAN His Excellency Same as Head of State His Excellency Mr. Mohammad Ashraf Ghani Mr. Mohammad Haneef Atmar Full Title President of the Islamic Republic of Acting Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Afghanistan Republic of Afghanistan Date of Appointment 29-Sep-14 04-Apr-20 ALBANIA His Excellency His Excellency same as Prime Minister Mr. Ilir Meta Mr. Edi Rama Full Title President of the Republic of Albania Prime Minister and Minister for Europe and Foreign Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs of the Affairs of the Republic of Albania Republic of Albania Date of Appointment 24-Jul-17 15-Sep-13 21-Jan-19 ALGERIA Son Excellence Son Excellence Son Excellence Monsieur Abdelmadjid Tebboune Monsieur Abdelaziz Djerad Monsieur Sabri Boukadoum Full Title Président de la République algérienne Premier Ministre de la République algérienne Ministre des Affaires étrangères de la République démocratique et populaire démocratique et populaire algérienne démocratique et populaire Date of Appointment 19-Dec-19 05-Jan-20 31-Mar-19 21/08/2020 Page 1 of 66 COUNTRY HEAD OF STATE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS ANDORRA Son Excellence Son Excellence Son Excellence Monseigneur Joan Enric Vives Sicília Monsieur Xavier Espot Zamora Madame Maria Ubach Font et Son Excellence Monsieur Emmanuel Macron Full Title Co-Princes de la Principauté d’Andorre Chef du Gouvernement de la Principauté d’Andorre Ministre des Affaires étrangères de la Principauté d’Andorre Date of Appointment 16-May-12 21-May-19 17-Jul-17 ANGOLA His Excellency His Excellency Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Belarusian-Polish Relations at the Present Stage: Balance of Interests
    Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Международные отношения Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations UDC 327(476:438) EVOLUTION OF BELARUSIAN-POLISH RELATIONS AT THE PRESENT STAGE: BALANCE OF INTERESTS V. G. SHADURSKI а aBelarusian State University, Nezavisimosti avenue, 4, Minsk, 220030, Republic of Belarus The present article is dedicated to the analysis of the Belarusian-Polish relations’ development during the post-USSR period. The conclusion is made that despite the geographical neighborhood of both countries, their cultural and historical proximity, cooperation between Minsk and Warsaw didn’t comply with the existing capacity. Political contradictions became the reason for that, which resulted in fluctuations in bilateral cooperation, local conflicts on the inter-state level. The author makes an attempt to identify the main reasons for a low level of efficiency in bilateral relations and to give an assessment of foreign factors impact on Minsk and Warsaw policies. Key words: Belarusian-Polish relations; Belarusian foreign policy; Belarusian and Polish diplomacy; historical policy. ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ БЕЛОРУССКО-ПОЛЬСКИХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ НА СОВРЕМЕННОМ ЭТАПЕ: ПОИСК БАЛАНСА ИНТЕРЕСОВ В. Г. ШАДУРСКИЙ 1) 1)Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Республика Беларусь В представленной публикации анализируется развитие белорусско-польских отношений на протяжении периода после распада СССР. Делается вывод о том, что, несмотря на географическое соседство двух стран, их культурную и историческую близость, сотрудничество Минска и Варшавы не соответствовало имеющемуся потенциалу. При- чиной тому являлись политические разногласия, следствием которых стали перепады в двухстороннем взаимодей- ствии, частые конфликты на межгосударственном уровне. Автор пытается выяснить основные причины невысокой эффективности двусторонних связей, дать оценку влияния внешних факторов на политику Минска и Варшавы.
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Rights-13-19.02.2021
    The information is aggregated from open source online resources and our own practice. In these newsletters, we will update you in brief on everyday human rights violations in numbers and facts. Summary: Saturday 13 February to Friday 19 February 2021 Human Rights Center “Viasna” reports that human rights activists have recognised 10 people as political prisoners. Nine of them were charged under articles of mass disorder; one was sentenced to four years in prison in a maximum security colony. In total, as of 19 February, 253 people in Belarus have been recognised as political prisoners. On 12 February 2021, Belarusian opposition Coordination Council member Maria Kolesnikova and her lawyer Maxim Znak, who have been imprisoned since September 2020, were charged with new offences, “Plotting to seize state power in an unconstitutional manner” and “Organising and controlling an extremist group”.1 Previously, Kolesnikova was ​ charged with “Publicly calling for actions threatening national security”.2 Alexander ​ Lukashenko’s key rival, Svetlana Tsikhanovskaya, as well as other exiled opposition leaders, including Pavel Latushko, Olga Kovalkovskaya, Sergey Dylevskiy, were charged under the same laws.3 ​ Marfa Rabkova, a well-known human rights defender from Human Rights Center “Viasna”, was charged with two more ‘extremist’ offences — “Inciting hatred or bias” and “Organising a criminal group or joining it”.4 Previously, Rabkova was charged with “Training and other ​ preparation of people to take part in mass riots, or financing such activities”.5 ​ The KGB added 17 Belarusians to the list of individuals involved in terrorist activities. All Belarusians added on 12 February 2021 to the updated KGB list are charged under Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Minsk Dialogue Forum Eastern Europe: in Search of Security for All
    Minsk Dialogue Forum Eastern Europe: In Search of Security for All May 23-25, 2018 Minsk Marriott Hotel Speakers’ biographies Dr. Wolfgang Sender is the Country Director Belarus of Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, a German political think tank. With over 20 years of experience in public policy, public affairs, media relations, policy advice, and security policy he focuses on analyzing, drafting, discussing and implementing communicative change processes with target groups in the political and public sphere. He also has a focus on military sociology. Wolfgang presents regularly at international conferences and workshops with a focus on the Eastern Partnership and publishes on Belarus and Russia. In his PhD thesis Wolfgang analyzed the OSCE election observations with regard to Russia. He has lectured at European Humanities University, Freie Universität Berlin, and Minsk State University. Wolfgang’s previous employments included positions in international companies, German government institutions, and the German Parliament. He studied political science, sociology and communications and holds a PhD from Freie Universität Berlin. Wolfgang is a member of several advisory boards in the field of economics, science, and politics. Vladimir Makei has served as the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus since August 2012. In 1993 he graduated from the Austrian Diplomatic Academy. He then served at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as Secretary of several departments (Information and Humanitarian Cooperation, Analysis and Forecast, Office of the Minister, State Protocol Service) prior to becoming Deputy Head of the State Protocol Service in 1995. From 1996 to 1999 Vladimir Makei served as Counselor of the Embassy of the Republic of Belarus in the French Republic and represented Belarus in the Council of Europe concurrently.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of China's Rise on Eu Foreign Policy Cohesion
    THE IMPACT OF CHINA’S RISE ON EU FOREIGN POLICY COHESION By Dominik Hertlik Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations Supervisor: Dr. Daniel Izsak CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary Word count: 14.299 2020 Abstract China’s rise and the consequences resulting from it have an effect on countries around the world. Its increasingly close cooperation with countries in Central and Eastern Europe (as well as Greece) has led to numerous EU member states (EUMS) pursuing foreign policies that are oftentimes more aligned with the interests of the Chinese leadership than the overall EU’s interests and values. The Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) of the EU is susceptible to such interference as its decisions are based on unanimity. Building up on this, this thesis argues that even though previous literature suggests that normative socialisation processes within CFSP policymaking and the consequent primacy of consensus seeking during negotiations have made the use of vetoes virtually insignificant, due to the increasing political and economic influence of China on some EUMS the importance of vetoes is rising again. Benefits of maintaining amicable relations to China might appear so attractive to some EUMS that in the light of China’s rise they are once again more prone to vetoing certain EU-level decisions critical of Beijing. The benefits held out in prospect vary and can be mostly economic, but also of political or ideological use. Costs of vetoing (besides from the reputational loss) seem to be virtually non-existent.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Perceptions Index 2020
    CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. #cpi2020 www.transparency.org/cpi Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of January 2021. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ISBN: 978-3-96076-157-0 2021 Transparency International. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 DE. Quotation permitted. Please contact Transparency International – [email protected] – regarding derivatives requests. CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 2-3 12-13 20-21 Map and results Americas Sub-Saharan Africa Peru Malawi 4-5 Honduras Zambia Executive summary Recommendations 14-15 22-23 Asia Pacific Western Europe and TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE European Union 6-7 Vanuatu Myanmar Malta Global highlights Poland 8-10 16-17 Eastern Europe & 24 COVID-19 and Central Asia Methodology corruption Serbia Health expenditure Belarus Democratic backsliding 25 Endnotes 11 18-19 Middle East & North Regional highlights Africa Lebanon Morocco TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL 180 COUNTRIES. 180 SCORES. HOW DOES YOUR COUNTRY MEASURE UP?
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Human Rights and Political Freedoms in Belarus: Was the Crisis Inevitable?
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47669/PSPRP-4-2020 The State of Human Rights and Political Freedoms in Belarus: Was the Crisis Inevitable? Nina Kolarzik and Aram Terzyan Center for East European and Russian Studies Post-Soviet Politics Research Papers 4/2020 Nina Kolarzik and Aram Terzyan Abstract The rule of Alexander Lukashenko in Belarus has created one of the most resilient authoritarian regimes in post-communist Europe. Meanwhile, the turmoil triggered by the 2020 presidential election has put in the spotlight the mounting challenges facing Lukashenko’s authoritarian rule. This paper investigates the state of human rights and political freedoms in Belarus, focusing on the main rationale behind the turmoil surrounding the 2020 presidential election. It concludes that the political crisis following the elections is the unsurprising consequence of Lukashenko’s diminishing ability to maintain power or concentrate political control by preserving elite unity, controlling elections, and/or using force against opponents. Keywords: Belarus, human rights, authoritarian rule, elections, civil society. Introduction Situated in the European Union - Russia shared neighborhood, Belarus has been characterized by ‘Soviet nostalgia’ rather than European aspirations. Politically, Belarus shows more similarities with the republics of post-Soviet Central Asia than with its neighbors in Europe. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union Belarus has gone from being a new and fragile democracy to a pariah state, largely regarded as “the last dictatorship in Europe” (Rudling 2008). Nevertheless, the anti-government protests following the 2020 presidential election show that despite the administrative, police and propaganda measures the Belarusian opposition and civil society managed to produce a real challenge to the existing status quo.
    [Show full text]
  • Merkel, Macron Call Putin As Mass Strikes Escalate In
    ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ – ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ AA-AA ﭼﻮ ﮐﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﺎﺷـﺪ ﺗﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺒـــــــﺎﺩ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻳﮏ ﺗﻦ ﻣــــﺒﺎﺩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﮐﺸﺘﻦ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﮐﻪ ﮐﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ www.afgazad.com [email protected] ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻬﺎی ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺋﯽ European Languages By Alex Lantier 20.08.2020 Merkel, Macron call Putin as mass strikes escalate in Belarus Strikes continue to spread across Belarus, after the disputed August 9 presidential elections and amid mounting anger at President Aleksandr Lukashenko’s disastrous handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. This weekend, Belarus saw the largest demonstrations since the Stalinist bureaucracy restored capitalism and dissolved the Soviet Union in 1991. Around 200,000 people marched this weekend in the capital, Minsk, demanding Lukashenko’s resignation and denouncing police violence and mass arrests targeting protesters. The growing mobilization of the working class has alarmed the European bourgeoisie. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron both called Russian President Vladimir Putin yesterday, before an extraordinary closed-door meeting of the European Council on Belarus today. Several state-owned factories joined the strike action yesterday, including the Belaruskali potash factory in Soligorsk. The world’s fifth-largest producer of the chemical, used to produce fertilizer, it earns a substantial portion of Belarus’ export earnings. State broadcasters also joined the strike, as well as the Kupalausky Theater in Minsk. Actors at the theater resigned en masse after the director, Pavel Latushko, was fired for siding with protesters. They were joining strikes, by Minsk transit workers and at auto and tractor factories as well as hospitals, that began on Monday amid calls for a nationwide general strike.
    [Show full text]
  • General Conclusions and Basic Tendencies 1. System of Human Rights Violations
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2003 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2003 INTRODUCTION: GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND BASIC TENDENCIES 1. SYSTEM OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS The year 2003 was marked by deterioration of the human rights situation in Belarus. While the general human rights situation in the country did not improve, in its certain spheres it significantly changed for the worse. Disrespect for and regular violations of the basic constitutional civic rights became an unavoidable and permanent factor of the Belarusian reality. In 2003 the Belarusian authorities did not even hide their intention to maximally limit the freedom of speech, freedom of association, religious freedom, and human rights in general. These intentions of the ruling regime were declared publicly. It was a conscious and open choice of the state bodies constituting one of the strategic elements of their policy. This political process became most visible in formation and forced intrusion of state ideology upon the citizens. Even leaving aside the question of the ideology contents, the very existence of an ideology, compulsory for all citizens of the country, imposed through propaganda media and educational establishments, and fraught with punitive sanctions for any deviation from it, is a phenomenon, incompatible with the fundamental human right to have a personal opinion. Thus, the state policy of the ruling government aims to create ideological grounds for consistent undermining of civic freedoms in Belarus. The new ideology is introduced despite the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus which puts a direct ban on that.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Monitoring of Human Rights Center “Viasna” Concerning Tortures and Facts of Other Kinds of Inhumane Treatment Towards Citizens of Belarus
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2004 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2004 PREAMBLE: CONCLUSIONS AND GENERALIZATIONS In 2004 the political situation in Belarus was distinguished by further worsening of the situation of human rights and the relations between the state and individuals. Regular and deliberate human rights violations became a necessary condition for the strengthening of the unlimited dictatorial power – infringements of human rights served as the funda¬ment for authoritarianism and were a favorable environment for the development of totalitarianism. One of the main factors that influenced the public and political situation in Belarus in 2004 was the Parliamentary election and the nationwide referendum concerning the possibility to prolong Aliaksandr Luka¬shenka’s presidential powers. The need for the liquidation of the cons¬ti¬tutional restriction of the number of possible presidential terms defined the state policy and influenced it in all circles of public life. This factor ma¬nifested in the sphere of human rights with the aggravation of the rep¬ressions against political opponents and prosecution of opposition-mindedness, enforcement of new discriminative legal acts, further limitation of the freedom of the press, violation of the liberty of peaceful assemblies and associations and other obstacles for the enjoyment of personal liberties by citizens of Belarus. Citizens of Belarus were deprived of the right to take part in the state government with the assistance of elected representatives. The election to the Chamber of Representatives wasn’t free and democratic. It was conducted according to the scenario that was prepared by the authorities in complete conformity with the “wishes” A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanctions Program: Belarus: Verordnung Vom 11. Dezember 2020 Über Massnahmen Gegenüber Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9), Anhang 1 Origin: EU Sanctions: Art
    Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO Bilateral Economic Relations Sanctions Version of 07.07.2021 Sanctions program: Belarus: Verordnung vom 11. Dezember 2020 über Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9), Anhang 1 Origin: EU Sanctions: Art. 2 Abs. 1 (Finanzsanktionen) und Art. 3 Abs. 1 (Ein- und Durchreiseverbot) Sanctions program: Bélarus: Ordonnance du 11 décembre 2020 instituant des mesures à l’encontre du Bélarus (RS 946.231.116.9), annexe 1 Origin: EU Sanctions: art. 2, al. 1 (Sanctions financières) et art. 3, al. 1 (Interdiction de séjour et de transit) Sanctions program: Bielorussia: Ordinanza del 11 dicembre 2020 che istituisce provvedimenti nei confronti della Bielorussia (RS 946.231.116.9), allegato 1 Origin: EU Sanctions: art. 2 cpv. 1 (Sanzioni finanziarie) e art. 3 cpv. 1 (Divieto di entrata e di transito) Individuals SSID: 20-45419 Name: Buhuk Natallia Mikhailauna Spelling variant: a) БУГУК Наталля Мiхайлаўна (Belarusian) b) Buguk Natalia Mikhailovna (Russian) c) БУГУК Наталья Михайловна (Russian) Sex: W DOB: 19 Dec 1989 POB: Minsk, Belarus Nationality: Belarus Justification: In her position as judge at the Fruzensky district court in Minsk, Natallia Buhuk is responsible for numerous politically motivated rulings against journalists and protesters, in particular the sentencing of Katsiaryna Bakhvalava (Andreyeva) and Darya Chultsova. Violations of rights of defence and of right to a fair trial were reported during trials conducted under her supervision. She is therefore responsible for serious human rights violations and for seriously undermining the rule of law, as well as for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Documents/128000/Ior530202001en.Pdf
    BELARUS: “YOU ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS” STATE-SPONSORED IMPUNITY AND UNPRECEDENTED POLICE VIOLENCE AGAINST PEACEFUL PROTESTERS BELARUS: “YOU ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS” STATE-SPONSORED IMPUNITY AND UNPRECEDENTED POLICE VIOLENCE AGAINST PEACEFUL PROTESTERS Amnesty International 1 Amnesty International is a movement of 10 million people which mobilizes the humanity in everyone and campaigns for change so we can all enjoy our human rights. Our vision is of a world where those in power keep their promises, respect international law and are held to account. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and individual donations. We believe that acting in solidarity and compassion with people everywhere can change our societies for the better BELARUS: “YOU ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS” STATE-SPONSORED IMPUNITY AND UNPRECEDENTED POLICE VIOLENCE AGAINST PEACEFUL PROTESTERS Amnesty International 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 UNPRECEDENTED SCALE OF POLICE VIOLENCE IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE 9 AUGUST 2020 ELECTION 5 FALSE CONCILIATORY PROMISES OF INVESTIGATION 9 PERSECUTION OF COMPLAINANTS AS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ESCALATE 10 KILLINGS OF PROTESTERS AND REPRISALS AGAINST POTENTIAL WITNESSES 12 STATE-SPONSORED IMPUNITY FOR THE PERPETRATORS 15 FORMAL HURDLES TO AN INVESTIGATION BEFORE IT BEGINS 17 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION MECHANISMS 19 RECOMMENDATIONS 21 BELARUS: “YOU ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS” STATE-SPONSORED IMPUNITY AND UNPRECEDENTED POLICE VIOLENCE AGAINST PEACEFUL PROTESTERS Amnesty International 3 INTRODUCTION Since the disputed 9 August 2020 presidential election in Belarus scores of consistently shocking images have emerged from the country: peaceful protesters brutally assaulted by riot police, stun grenades fired into peaceful crowds at short range, and the blood-stained faces and severely bruised bodies of men and women released from detention.
    [Show full text]