Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 164/Wednesday, August 25, 2010/Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 164/Wednesday, August 25, 2010/Notices 52368 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Notices individuals were identified. No remains and the Quapaw Tribe of SEL–010, an archeological site on associated funerary objects are present. Indians, Oklahoma. private land. No known individuals Based on the skeletal and dental Representatives of any other Indian were identified. No associated funerary morphology, as well as accession tribe that believes itself to be culturally objects are present. records, officials of the Memphis Pink affiliated with the human remains The Point West of Halibut Cove Site Palace Museum have determined that should contact Louella Weaver, dates to A.D. 1260 – A.D. 1418, and has the above-mentioned human remains Memphis Pink Palace Museum, 3050 two components. The site includes a are Native American. Based on the Central Ave., Memphis, TN 38111, Precontact period Dena’ina house built ceramic styles and construction of telephone (901) 320–6322, before into a prehistoric Marine Kachemak pottery related to the sites, but that are September 24, 2010. Repatriation of the tradition (Sugpiaq Alutiiq tradition) not associated funerary objects, the human remains to the Quapaw Tribe of midden. Two burials were inside the human remains can be associated with Indians, Oklahoma, may proceed after midden. Once the crew determined that the Nodena, Parkin and Walls Phases of that date if no additional claimants they were human, the remains were the Late Mississippian and proto- come forward. covered and excavation in that area historic periods (A.D. 1350–1650). The Memphis Pink Palace Museum is ceased. No funerary artifacts were seen Oral traditional and archeological responsible for notifying the Quapaw or removed. The human remains from evidence indicate that the Quapaw Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma, that this the excavation in the Pratt Museum are occupied and hunted in the central notice has been published. isolates from the middle of a midden that consisted of thousands of animal Mississippi Valley, including the Dated: August 19, 2010 bones and shell fragments, and some modern city of Memphis, TN, for David Tarler, generations prior to European contact. artifacts. As the human remains do not Acting Manager, National NAGPRA Program. comprise a burial, these artifacts are not Historical documentation identifies [FR Doc. 2010–21186 Filed 8–4–10; 8:45 am] Quapaw villages located on both sides considered to be funerary objects. BILLING CODE 4312–50–S In the 1970s, human remains of the Mississippi River in the Central representing a minimum of one Mississippi Valley as early as the mid– individual were removed from 1500s. Based on historical and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Kachemak Bay, AK. No known archeological evidence, the Bradley site individual was identified. No associated (3CT7) has been identified as Pacaha, National Park Service funerary objects are present. the principal town of the Pacaha In the 1980s, human remains Notice of Inventory Completion: Homer chiefdom during the DeSoto entrada in representing a minimum of one Society of Natural History, Pratt Arkansas (A.D. 1541–1543). Linguistic individual were removed from the Museum, Homer, AK evidence indicates a possible link surface of a beach on Kachemak Bay, between the ‘‘Capaha’’ (a.k.a. Pacaha) in AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. AK, by a private individual. The human a Spanish account, and a late 17th ACTION: Notice. remains were given to the education century Quapaw Indian village name department, but were never ‘‘Kappaha’’ or ‘‘Kappa.’’ French maps and Notice is here given in accordance accessioned. In 2010, the human documents (A.D. 1673–1720), indicate with the Native American Graves remains were found in the education that only the Quapaw had villages on Protection and Repatriation Act department’s collection. No known both sides of the Mississippi River in (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the individual was identified. No associated eastern Arkansas and western completion of an inventory of human funerary objects are present. Mississippi, and much of northeastern remains in the possession of the Homer In the 1990s, human remains Arkansas was hunting territory. Society of Natural History, Pratt representing a minimum of one Therefore, the sites are within the Museum, Homer, AK. The human individual were removed from near traditional territory of the Quapaw. remains were removed from Kachemak Cottonwood Creek Bluff, Kachemak Bay, Descendants of the Quapaw are Bay, AK. AK, by a private individual. No known members of the Quapaw Tribe of This notice is published as part of the individual was identified. No associated Indians, Oklahoma. Finally, the Quapaw National Park Service’s administrative funerary objects are present. Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma, under the responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 The archeological and documentary NAGPRA process, have previously U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in evidence are in agreement that the repatriated Native American human this notice are the sole responsibility of Kachemak Bay was used by both the remains and associated funerary objects, the museum, institution, or Federal ancestors of the Seldovia Village and have been determined to be agency that has control of the Native (Dena’ina Athabascan and Sugpiaq culturally affiliated with the cultural American human remains. The National Alutiiq) and Kenaitze Indian (Dena’ina assemblages fround on archeological Park Service is not responsible for the Athabascan) tribal members. Kachemak sites related to Nodena, Parkin and determinations in this notice. Bay is the historically documented Walls phases. A detailed assessment of the human territory of both the Seldovia Village Officials of the Memphis Pink Palace remains was made by Pratt Museum Tribe and Kenaitze Indian Tribe. Museum have determined that, professional staff in consultation with Officials of the Pratt Museum have pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the representatives of the Kenaitze Indian determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. human remains described above Tribe and the Seldovia Village Tribe. 3001(9), the human remains described represent the physical remains of 17 above represent the physical remains of individuals of Native American In the summers of 1987 and 1988, eight individuals of Native American ancestry. Officials of the Memphis Pink human remains representing five ancestry. Officials of the Pratt Museum Palace Museum also have determined individuals were removed from the also have determined that, pursuant to that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), Point West of Halibut Cove Site (SEL– 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship there is a relationship of shared group 010), formally known as Calhoun’s of shared group identity that can be identity that can be reasonably traced Point, in Kachemak Bay, AK. The Pratt reasonably traced between the Native between the Native American human Museum sponsored the excavation of American human remains and the VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Aug 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM 25AUN1 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Notices 52369 Kenaitze Indian Tribe and Seldovia in the vicinity of the city of The Dalles, U.S.C. 3001(3)(A), the one object Village Tribe. Wasco County, OR, by Alonzo Hancock. described above is reasonably believed Representatives of any other Indian Mr. Hancock removed the remains after to have been placed with or near tribe that believes itself to be culturally they had been excavated during individual human remains at the time of affiliated with the Native American construction work on the south side of death or later as part of the death rite human remains should contact Dr. a roadcut. The exact location of the road or ceremony. Lastly, officials of the Cusack-McVeigh, Pratt Museum, 3779 is unclear from museum records. Mr. Oregon Museum of Science and Bartlett St., Homer, AK 99603, Hancock donated the human remains to Industry have determined that, pursuant telephone (907) 235–8635, ext. 36, the Oregon Museum of Science and to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a before September 24, 2010. Repatriation Industry in 1946. No known individual relationship of shared group identity of the human remains to the Kenaitze was identified. No associated funerary that can be reasonably traced between Indian Tribe and the Seldovia Village objects are present. the Native American human remains Tribe may proceed after that date if no The human remains have been and associated funerary object and the additional claimants come forward. identified as Native American based on Confederated Tribes of the Warm The Pratt Museum is responsible for observable dental traits and museum Springs Reservation of Oregon and the notifying the Kenaitze Indian Tribe and documentation that refers to the human Confederated Tribes and Bands of the the Seldovia Village Tribe that this remains as ‘‘Chinook.’’ Yakama Indian Nation, Washington. notice has been published. In the 1930s, human remains Representatives of any other Indian representing a minimum of one Dated: August 19, 2010 tribe that believes itself to be culturally individual were removed from an area David Tarler, affiliated with the human remains and in the vicinity of the city of The Dalles, associated funerary object should Acting Manager, National NAGPRA Program. Wasco County, OR, by an unknown contact Lori Erickson, Curator, Oregon [FR Doc. 2010–21190 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am] individual. The exact location of the Museum of Science and Industry, 1945 BILLING CODE 4312–50–S area is unclear from museum records. SE Water Ave., Portland, OR 97214, The human remains were donated to the telephone (503) 797–4582, before Oregon Museum of Science and September 24, 2010. Repatriation of the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Industry by an unknown individual human remains and associated funerary sometime between the 1940s and the National Park Service object to the Confederated Tribes of the 1970s.
Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • No. 26: the MISSISSIPPI DE SOTO TRAIL MAPPING PROJECT
    Archaeological Report No. 26 The Mississippi De Soto Trail Mapping Project David Morgan Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson, Mississippi 1996 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Archaeological Report No. 26 Patricia Galloway Series Editor Elbert R. Hilliard Director Typeset by Lesley Range ISBN: 0-938896-76-8 Copyright © 1997 Mississippi Department of Archives and History CONTENTS Introduction. ......................................... .. 1 Project Overview. ..................................... .. 1 Research Universe 2 Site Selection and Plotting Procedures .................... .. 2 Historic Overview. .................................... .. 3 Route Comparisons. ................................... .. 4 Site File Contributions. ................................ .. 5 Comments 7 Conclusion. .......................................... .. 8 Bibliography ........................................ .. 10 Index to Named Sites in Appendix III .................... .. 17 Diagnostic Ceramics by Region Appendix I Maps ...................................... .. Appendix II Site Inventory Forms . .. Appendix III (located on microfiche) List of Maps in Appendix II The Entire State of Mississippi Map 1 Inset A ......................................... Map 2 Inset B Map 3 Inset C . Map 4 Inset D ......................................... Map 5 Inset E Map 6 "Spaghetti" Map Map 7 The Mississippi De Soto Trail Mapping Project By David Morgan Introduction The route of the Hernando de Soto expedition through the state of Mississippi
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation Polygons
    Polygon Date & Period Archaeological Phase Cultural - Historical Source & Comment Hist or Arch Pop & Sites Group Estimate 1 early 16th century Little Tennessee site 16th century Chiaha mid-16th century, Little Tennessee site cluster cluster and sites 7-19 and sites 7-19, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Chiaha, three populations, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Little Tennessee cluster plus additional sites, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 2 early 16th century Hiwassee site cluster mid-16th century, Hiwassee site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Hiwassee cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 3 early 16th century Chattanooga site cluster 16th century Napochies mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century Napochies, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 4 early 16th century Carters site cluster; 16th century Coosa mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Hally et al. X Barnett phase 1990:Fig. 9.1; Barnett phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century Coosa, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 5 early 16th century Cartersville site cluster; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Hally et Brewster phase al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; Brewster phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 6 early 16th century Rome site cluster; 16th century Apica mid-16th century, Rome site cluster, Hally et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    An ethnographic perspective on prehistoric platform mounds of the Tonto Basin, Central Arizona Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Elson, Mark David, 1955- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 00:20:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/290644 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI fihns the text directly from the orighud or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fiice, \^e others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, b^inning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert L. Rankin University of Kansas This Paper Concerns What Many Believe to Be the First Documented Reference Anywhere To
    DE SOTO'S CAPAHA: SIOUAN OR TUNICAN? 1 Robert L. Rankin University of Kansas This paper concerns what many believe to be the first documented reference anywhere to a Siouan tribe. In the year 1539 Hernando de Soto landed in Flori- da and marched across what are now the southeastern United States. He is credited with discovering the Mississippi River, and his body was ultimately entombed in its waters. Three of the participants on the de Soto expedition (two Spanish speakers and one Portu- guese speaker) kept journals documenting, among other things, the names of the native towns they passed through. These town names have enabled linguists, working with anthropologists and archaeologists, to draw a moderately accurate ethnographic map of the proto-historic Southeast--a map that had already changed considerably by the time the French and English turned their attention to the region 130 years later. Thus linguistic identification of the de Soto town names represents an important contribution to our un- derstanding of these early times. Upon crossing the Mississippi River into present- day Arkansas, de Soto's party lived for about a month in an Indian town called Pacaha or Capaha by Spanish chroniclers. Because of the superficial similarity of one of the spellings of this town name to the name of one of the Quapaw villages at the mouth of the Arkansas River visited by Marquette in 1673, many linguists and historians over the years have equated Pacaha with the Quapaws. W. David Baird in his 1980 history of the Quapaw tribe attributes the first mention of this theo- ry to Father Charlevoix in 1721, and it has been end- lessly repeated since then in both professional and popular literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelby County, TN
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THREE SITES NEAR ARLINGTON, STATE ROUTE 385 (PAUL BARRETT PARKWAY), SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE Archaeological Testing at 40SY525 and 40SY526 and Archaeological Testing and Data Recovery at 40SY527 compiled by Guy G. Weaver authored by Guy G. Weaver C. Andrew Buchner Mitchell R. Childress Mary E. Starr with contributions by Andrea Shea ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OFFICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLICATIONS IN ARCHAEOLOGY NO. 4 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1999 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THREE SITES NEAR ARLINGTON, STATE ROUTE 385 (PAUL BARRETT PARKWAY), SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE Archaeological Testing at 40SY525 and 40SY526 and Archaeological Testing and Data Recovery at 40SY527 PREPARED FOR The Tennessee Department of Transportation J.K. Polk Building, Suite 900 Nashville, TN 37243 615/741-5257 IN COORDINATION WITH The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration UNDER TDOT Project Number 93-42-04-1230 Tennessee State Archaeological Permit Number 000132R BY GARROW & ASSOCIATES, INC. Memphis, TN 38103 SUBMITTED APRIL 1996 PUBLISHED MARCH 1999 Edited by: Guy G. Weaver Contributions by: Guy G. Weaver C. Andrew Buchner Mitchell R. Childress Mary E. Starr Andrea Shea TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OFFICE PUBLICATIONS IN ARCHAEOLOGY NO. 4 STATE OF TENNESSEE POLICY OF NON-DISCRIMINATION Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Transportation does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age or disability in employment nor in access to or participation in any of its activities, programs, or services. Civil rights inquires or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Transportation, Affirmative Action Director, Civil Rights Division, Suite 400, James K.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 245/Monday, December 22, 2014
    Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 76351 Felipe, New Mexico; Pueblo of Taos, human remains should submit a written DATES: Lineal descendants or New Mexico; Pueblo of Zia, New request with information in support of representatives of any Indian tribe or Mexico; Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the request to Sheila Goff, History Native Hawaiian organization not the Fort Hall Reservation; Standing Colorado, 1200 Broadway, Denver, CO identified in this notice that wish to Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South 80203, telephone (303) 866–4531, email request transfer of control of these Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the [email protected] by January 21, human remains and associated funerary Fort Berthold Reservation, North 2015. After that date, if no additional objects should submit a written request Dakota; and Wichita and Affiliated requestors have come forward, transfer with information in support of the Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, Waco & of control of the human remains to the request to the Arkansas Archeological Tawakonie), Oklahoma, were invited to Southern Ute Indian Tribe of the Survey at the address in this notice by consult but did not participate. Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado; Ute January 21, 2015. Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray History and Description of the Remains ADDRESSES: George Sabo, Director, Reservation, Utah; and Ute Mountain Arkansas Archeological Survey, 2475 In the 1920s, human remains Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation, North Hatch Avenue, Fayetteville, AR representing, at minimum, one Colorado, New Mexico & Utah may 72704, telephone (479) 575–3556. individual were removed from the back proceed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of a shallow cave in the vicinity of Bed History Colorado is responsible for Notice is Rock, CO, in Montrose County, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • National Humanities Center: De Soto Expedition, 1539-1543
    The Expedition of John Carter Brown Library, Brown University HERNANDO DE SOTO in southeastern North America, 1539-1543 as recounted by a member of the expedition, in A true relation of the vicissitudes that attended the Governor Don Hernando de Soto and some nobles of Portugal in the discovery of the region of Florida . by a Fidalgo [Gentleman] of Elvas [town in Portugal], 1557.*Excerpts. In order to convey the physical and experiential expanse of the expedition, from its initial landing in 1539 with over 600 men, to the arrival of 300 desperate survivors in Mexico four years later, excerpts are presented here from all chapters relating to the mainland expedition. Ch 7. HOW WE LEFT HAVANA AND CAME TO FLORIDA, AND WHAT OTHER MATTERS TOOK PLACE. On Sunday, the 18th day of May, in the year 1539 the Hernando de Soto, in Antonio de Herrera y Tordesillas, Historia General de los Hechos de los Adelantado [Governor] sailed from Havana [Cuba] with a Castellanos en las Islas y Tierra Firme del Mar fleet of nine vessels, five of them ships, two caravels, two Océano, 1728 edition (orig. publ. 1601) pinnaces; and he ran seven days with favorable weather. On the 25th of the month, being the festival of Espiritu Santo [Pentecost], the land was seen, and anchor cast a league [three miles] from shore because of the shoals. On Friday, the 30th, the army landed in Florida, two leagues from the town of an Indian chief named Ucita. So soon as the people were come to land, the camp was pitched on the seaside near the bay, which goes up close to the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Indians, French and Africans in the Mississippi Valley Sonia Toudji
    Intimate Frontiers : Indians, French and Africans in the Mississippi Valley Sonia Toudji To cite this version: Sonia Toudji. Intimate Frontiers : Indians, French and Africans in the Mississippi Valley. History. Université du Maine, 2011. English. NNT : 2011LEMA3008. tel-00675452 HAL Id: tel-00675452 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00675452 Submitted on 1 Mar 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Université du Maine – Le Mans École doctorale SCE Laboratoire de recherche 3L.AM (E.A. 4335) Frontières Intimes: Indiens, Français, et Africains dans la Vallée du Mississippi Thèse de doctorat en civilisation américaine en cotutelle avec University of Arkansas soutenue le 9 décembre 2011 par Sonia Toudji Sous la direction de Mme le professeur Hélène AJI Co-direction de Mme le professeur Eline Elmaleh Membres du jury M. Morris S. Arnold, Judge M. James Gigantino II, professeur à University of Arkansas Mme. Beth Barton Schweiger, professeur à University of Arkansas M. Elliott West, professeur à University of Arkansas Contents Maps & Illustrations Acknowledgments Introduction Part I: Liaisons & Alliances: French settlers and Quapaw Indians Chapter 1: The Encounter: Cohabitation and Kinship at Arkansas Post I.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Prehistoric Social Dynamics in the Northern Yazoo Basin
    Late Prehistoric Social Dynamics in the Northern Yazoo Basin Fourth Semester Paper Presented in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Ph.D. (First Stage) The University of North Carolina Erin L. Stevens April 2008 Introduction Over the last century, archaeologists working in the Lower Mississippi Valley have identified and attempted to resolve a number of research questions spanning the prehistoric and protohistoric periods. In the northern Yazoo Basin of northwest Mississippi, researchers have been most concerned with two: the origins and development of Mississippian culture within the region, perhaps beginning as early as the 11th century A.D., and the location and nature of the societies encountered by the De Soto entrada in the spring of 1541. Archaeological evidence indicates that the intervening centuries were a time of dynamic cultural change within the region, a result of the unique combination of persistent local traditions and the introduction of, resistance to, and adoption of materials and ideas from outside the region. In this work I present a case study that illustrates how “Mississippian” is expressed over a particular period of time and in a particular place, namely at the Parchman Place site of Coahoma County, Mississippi, a late prehistoric mound site located in the northern Yazoo Basin (Figure 1). In addition to describing a chronological sequence of events, I discuss the history of the Parchman site in terms of the lives of the people who lived there some 50-100 years before De Soto and his men made their way into the valley. The De Soto chronicles paint a vivid picture of native life in the Yazoo Basin near the climax of the Mississippi period, often described as a cultural “florescence” in the region (Phillips et al 1951; Williams and Brain 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippian Capitals : an Archaeological Investigation Of
    MISSISSIPPIAN CAPITALS: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF PRECOLUMBIAN POLITICAL STRUCTURE \ CLAUDINE PAYNE Vi . A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1994 LD 1780 199i Copyright 1994 by Claudine Payne For my mother, Marjorie Hopkins Payne and in memory of my father, Richard McDonald Payne ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people contributed to this study of Mississippian capitals. At the top of the list is Dr. Jerald Milanich, my dissertation advisor, who provided assistance and advice in innumerable ways. Among other things, he arranged funding for several aspects of my investigations at the Lake Jackson site. In addition, he employed me on several museum projects and recommended me for others, thus making it possible for me to continue my research and writing. And he worked wonders when imiversity red tape occasionally snarled. I especially appreciate his unflagging patience as this project threatened to go on forever. It has been a pleasure and an honor to work with him. 1 am also grateful to the other members of my committee, Drs. WilUam Keegan, William Marquardt, Michael Moseley, and Graig Shaak, who were unfailingly supportive and helpful throughout the dissertation process. Two earUer committee members, Drs. James Henry and Prudence Rice, whose careers took them away from the University of Florida before I finished, provided valuable advice and direction in the early stages of research. 1 also thank Dr. Kathleen Deagan who graciously stepped in to fill a temporary committee gap. Although not a committee member.
    [Show full text]