DOCSLIB.ORG

Shelby County, TN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shelby County, TN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THREE SITES NEAR ARLINGTON, STATE ROUTE 385 (PAUL BARRETT PARKWAY), SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE Archaeological Testing at 40SY525 and 40SY526 and Archaeological Testing and Data Recovery at 40SY527 compiled by Guy G. Weaver authored by Guy G. Weaver C. Andrew Buchner Mitchell R. Childress Mary E. Starr with contributions by Andrea Shea ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OFFICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLICATIONS IN ARCHAEOLOGY NO. 4 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1999 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THREE SITES NEAR ARLINGTON, STATE ROUTE 385 (PAUL BARRETT PARKWAY), SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE Archaeological Testing at 40SY525 and 40SY526 and Archaeological Testing and Data Recovery at 40SY527 PREPARED FOR The Tennessee Department of Transportation J.K. Polk Building, Suite 900 Nashville, TN 37243 615/741-5257 IN COORDINATION WITH The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration UNDER TDOT Project Number 93-42-04-1230 Tennessee State Archaeological Permit Number 000132R BY GARROW & ASSOCIATES, INC. Memphis, TN 38103 SUBMITTED APRIL 1996 PUBLISHED MARCH 1999 Edited by: Guy G. Weaver Contributions by: Guy G. Weaver C. Andrew Buchner Mitchell R. Childress Mary E. Starr Andrea Shea TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OFFICE PUBLICATIONS IN ARCHAEOLOGY NO. 4 STATE OF TENNESSEE POLICY OF NON-DISCRIMINATION Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Transportation does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age or disability in employment nor in access to or participation in any of its activities, programs, or services. Civil rights inquires or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Transportation, Affirmative Action Director, Civil Rights Division, Suite 400, James K. Polk Building, Nashville, TN 37243-0327. Telephone: (615) 741-5996. Toll Free: 1 (800) 370-3647. Hearing impaired callers may use the Tennessee Relay Service: 1 (800) 848-0298. PROJECT FUNDING AND ADMINISTRATION Funding for this project and the publication of this report was provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The TDOT administered the project contracts. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals contributed to the successful completion of this project. We gratefully acknowledge the technical and logistical support of Mr. Gerald Kline and Ms. Caroline Albright, archaeologists with the Tennessee Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Office, in Nashville. Mr. Ed Cain and other staff members at Parsons De Leuw were instrumental in seeing that a cooperative effort between all parties was a successful one. We also wish to thank the landowners, Dr. Harris, Ms. Hayes, and Mr. Fulmer, for their permission to examine their property in the proposed highway corridor. Evan Peacock, Zone Archaeologist for the Tombigbee Ranger District, Holly Springs National Forest, is thanked for providing literature concerning Tchula period sites in his area and for taking the time to visit the Fulmer site during the excavations. Robert Mainfort, Tennessee Division of Archaeology, deserves special thanks for providing unpublished technical manuscripts and advice on Early Woodland ceramics in west Tennessee. Gerald Smith and Charles McNutt, University of Memphis, are also appreciated for their help and support throughout the project. In addition, Sarge’s Backhoe and Equipment Company furnished heavy equipment and a skilled operator, Kevin Acklin. Andrea Shea tabulated the carbonized remains from the Fulmer site (Appendix B). Many Garrow & Associates personnel contributed to this report. Guy Weaver was Principal Investigator. Besides compiling and reviewing the report, Mr. Weaver is responsible for the reporting of the Fulmer site (40SY527) and contributions to the discussion section. Barbara Garrow was Project Manager. Mitch Childress contributed sections of the discussion, prepared many of the graphics, “ran the numbers,” and assisted for several days during Phase III fieldwork at 40SY527. Drew Buchner was Field Director and is primarily responsible for the reporting of 40SY525 and 40SY526. Mary E. Starr contributed to the ceramic analysis and discussion sections. Archaeological Field Technicians included Melissa Buchner, Michael Childress, Brian Collins, Angela Dobecka, Mike Horton, Charles H. McNutt Jr., Lee Mosley, José Oliver, Stella Parker, Mary E. Starr, and Charles Woods. Christopher Keoppel was Senior Field Technician. Laboratory processing and analysis were performed by Michael Childress, Brian Collins, Christopher Keoppel, Rodriguez McClay, Charles H. McNutt Jr., Stella Parker, and Louella Whitson Weaver. Flotation samples were processed by Michael Childress. The photographic plates were prepared by Candice Spearman; the final graphics were prepared by Vince Macek. Nancy Liebe helped in production of the draft report. The report was copyedited, formatted, and produced by Dan Dolensky. In 1998, Caroline Albright, under contract with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc., completed the final editing of the report for TDOT in its preparation for publication. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..........................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................................................................vii LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................................x I. INTRODUCTION (BUCHNER, WEAVER, CHILDRESS).............................................................................................1 PROJECT LOCATION.................................................................................................................................................1 OUTLINE OF THE REPORT .......................................................................................................................................1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING (CHILDRESS, BUCHNER, WEAVER) ....................................................................4 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY...........................................................................................................................4 SOILS............................................................................................................................................................................7 CLIMATE ...................................................................................................................................................................10 PALEOENVIRONMENT...........................................................................................................................................13 FLORA AND FAUNA................................................................................................................................................13 III. CULTURAL OVERVIEW (CHILDRESS, BUCHNER) ........................................................................................15 PALEOINDIAN PERIOD (CA. 11,500–9,900 B.P.) ...................................................................................................15 Fluted Point Occupations (ca. 11,500–10,500 B.P.) ...............................................................................................15 Dalton Period (ca. 10,500–9,900 B.P.) ...................................................................................................................16 ARCHAIC PERIOD (CA. 9,900–3,000 B.P.)..............................................................................................................17 Early Archaic (ca. 9,900–7,000 B.P.)......................................................................................................................18 Middle Archaic (ca. 7,000–5,000 B.P.)....................................................................................................................18 Late Archaic (ca. 5,000–3,000 B.P.)........................................................................................................................20 WOODLAND PERIOD (CA. 3,000–1,000 B.P.).........................................................................................................21 Early Woodland (ca. 3,000–2,000 B.P.) ..................................................................................................................21 Middle Woodland (ca. 2,000–1,500 B.P.)................................................................................................................21 Late Woodland (ca. 1,500–1,000 B.P.)....................................................................................................................22 MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD (CA. A.D. 900–1600)........................................................................................................22 Early Mississippian (ca. A.D. 900–1200) ................................................................................................................23 Late Mississippian (ca. A.D. 1200–1600)................................................................................................................24 HISTORIC OCCUPATION ........................................................................................................................................24
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover
    I. A CONSIDERATION OF TINE AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRIJCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT MOUND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore 40 II. A CONSIDERATION OF TIME AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT 14)UND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore INTRODUCT ION In considering the subject of prehistoric earthmoving and the construction of monuments associated with it, there are many variables for which some sort of control must be achieved before any feasible demographic features related to the labor involved in such construction can be derived. Many of the variables that must be considered can be given support only through certain fundamental assumptions based upon observations of related extant phenomena. Many of these observations are contained in the ethnographic record of aboriginal cultures of the world whose activities and subsistence patterns are more closely related to the prehistoric cultures of a particular area. In other instances, support can be gathered from observations of current manual labor related to earth moving since the prehistoric constructions were accomplished manually by a human labor force. The material herein will present alternative ways of arriving at the represented phenomena. What is inherently important in considering these data is the element of cultural organization involved in such activities. One need only look at sites such as the Valley of the Kings and the great pyramids of Egypt, Teotihuacan, La Venta and Chichen Itza in Mexico, the Cahokia mound group in Illinois, and other such sites to realize that considerable time, effort and organization were required.
    [Show full text]
  • Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO
    Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Engineering and Technical Committee Thursday, February 7, 2019 1:30 PM UT Health Science Center – Student Alumni Building 800 Madison Avenue - Memphis, Tennessee Note: Please fill out a comment card and return it to an MPO staff member located at the Sign-In Table to be given the opportunity to speak on any of the agenda items. Comment cards must be returned before the agenda item is brought to the floor. You will be given up to two minutes to provide your comments. 1) Call to Order 2) Approval of November 1, 2018 Minutes ACTION 3) Memphis MPO’s Administrator’s Report a) 2018 State of the MPO Annual Report b) 2018 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Biennial Report c) FY 2020-21 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Major Planning Activities List d) MPO Unobligated Balance (TN) – Update e) FY 2020-23 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – Update f) 2019 Transportation Management Area (TMA) Certification 4) Memphis Urban Area MPO and West Memphis MPO Cooperative Agreement ACTION Approval of a cooperative agreement between the Memphis MPO and the West Memphis MPO for coordination of transportation planning activities, as required by 23 CFR 450.314 5) Tri-State Umbrella Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) ACTION Approval of an MOU between the Memphis MPO, West Memphis MPO, TDOT, TDEC, MDOT, MDEQ, ARDOT, ADEQ, MATA, and the Shelby County Health Department for coordination of the transportation planning process within the Memphis, TN-MS-AR Urbanized Area, as required by 23 CFR
    [Show full text]
  • Music Music Muiiu
    Page B6 The DeKalb Collegian May 4, 1994 Music MusicmA-..- . mit.,.Muiiu_____ m ..... C D R E V IE W S : R e le a se s Lysistrata takes a baudy peek at the ll.p . ZIKiklR bedroom, society, and Greek life The DeKalb Theatre Company brings Greek comedy to life with a production of Lysistrata. Performances will be May 12 - 14 at 8 p.m. with a matinee on May 15 at 3 p.m. in the By Marilyn Lunsford Marvin M. Cole Auditorium on Cen­ Arts/Entertainment Editor tral. Jump In The Water — Nothing Else Will Do The play is a classic Greek comedy This is Jump In The Water’s second album, their first for the brand-new Parachute/ that begins with the women of Greece Mercury label. The group combines good, lyrics that tell a simple story. Their style mixes refusing to sleep with their husbands many influences — a little pop, rock, country and Tin Pan Alley. This fun album offers a until they end the war. refreshing change from heavy messages. Kent Forsyth, songwriter and guitarist; David Typical of the classic Greek com­ Stams, on bass/ keyboards/ multi-instrumentals; Steve Moos, songwriter and guitar; and edy what starts out very simply gets Andrew Coyne on mandolin make up the group. Main Appeal Group: Mid 20s to 40s. more and more complicated as the play progresses. Texas — Ricks Road Much of the humor is sexual and This is the group’s third album on the Mercury label. The group consists of Sharleen plays off traditional male and female Spiteri, Vocals and guitar, Ally McErlaine, guitar; Richard Hynd, drums; and Eddie roles.The play may be considered too Campbell on keyboards.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierce Mounds Complex an Ancient Capital in Northwest Florida
    Pierce Mounds Complex An Ancient Capital in Northwest Florida Nancy Marie White Department of Anthropology University of South Florida, Tampa [email protected] Final Report to George J. Mahr, Apalachicola, Florida December 2013 ii ABSTRACT The Pierce site (8Fr14), near the mouth of the Apalachicola River in Franklin County, northwest Florida, was a major prehistoric mound center during the late Early and Middle Woodland (about A.D. 200-700) and Mississippian (about A.D. 1000-1500) periods. People lived there probably continuously during at least the last 2000 years (until right before the European invasion of Florida in the sixteenth century) and took advantage of the strategic location commanding the river and bay, as well as the abundant terrestrial and aquatic resources. Besides constructing several mounds for burial of the dead and probably support of important structures, native peoples left long midden (refuse) ridges of shells, animal bones, artifacts and blackened sandy soils, which built up a large and very significant archaeological site. Early Europeans and Americans who settled in the town of Apalachicola recognized the archaeological importance of Pierce and collected artifacts. But since the site and its spectacular findings were published by C.B. Moore in 1902, much information has been lost or misunderstood. Recent investigations by the University of South Florida were commissioned by the property owner to research and evaluate the significance of the site. There is evidence for an Early Woodland (Deptford) occupation and mound building, possibly as early as A.D. 200. Seven of the mounds form an oval, with the Middle Woodland burial mounds on the west side.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16B)
    OMB No. 10024-0018 NFS Form 10-900 (Oct. 1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service FEB | 7 I999 National Register of Historic Places m REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Registration Form NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ** This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic and Architectural Resources of Union City, (Obion County) Tennessee B. Associated Historic Contexts___________________________ (Name each Associated Historic Context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each>) I. Development of Economics and Transportation, 1854 to 1947 II. Development of Domestic Architecture, 1854 -1947 C. Form Prepared by name/title Judi M. Mclntyre, Kate Carouthers, Carroll Van West organization MTSU Center for Historic Preservation date October 1998 street & number PO Box 80, MTSU __ telephone 615-898-2947 city or town Murfreesboro state TN____ zip code 37132 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set for in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Covington TN
    Best Practices Case Studies Series Tennessee Department of Transportation Long Range Planning Division COVINGTON, TENNESSEE BUSINESS DISTRICT, DOWNTOWN, AND NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION Covington, Tennessee is in central Tipton County, a few miles from the Mississippi River in West Tennessee. Like many small towns, Covington had seen its downtown business district decline over the years in favor of development elsewhere in the community. In recent years Covington leaders have worked hard to revitalize the Courthouse Square in Covington, creating a new sense of place for both residents and visitors. STEP I: BUILDING PROJECT SUPPORT • Tipton County and the Downtown Merchants Association were the catalysts for the project • A coalition was built among Tipton County, the City of Covington, the Downtown Merchants Association, and the Covington-Tipton County Chamber of Commerce to take the project forward • There were 4 public hearings for the project to obtain public opinion and ideas STEP II: PROJECT PLANNING & DESIGN • A master plan for the project was created by Memphis area A2H firm and developed the project into multiple phases STEP III: PROJECT FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION PHASE I AND II: - Funded by $1.1 million in TE21 grants from TDOT - $900,000 from City of Covington and Tipton County to fund infrastructure improvements to the Courthouse Square - Replacement of sidewalks - New street lights - Replacement of street pavement - Speakers to play music - Installation of irrigation system and underground wiring PHASE III: - Funded by a $820,000
    [Show full text]
  • A History Southeastern Archaeological Conference Its Seventy-Fifth Annual Meeting, 2018
    A History m of the M Southeastern Archaeological Conference m in celebration of M Its Seventy-Fifth Annual Meeting, 2018 Dedicated to Stephen Williams: SEAC Stalwart Charles H. McNutt 1928–2017 Copyright © 2018 by SEAC Printed by Borgo Publishing for the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Copy editing and layout by Kathy Cummins ii Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Ancestors ..................................................................................................5 Setting the Agenda:The National Research Council Conferences ....................................................................15 FERACWATVAWPA ............................................................................21 Founding Fathers ...................................................................................25 Let’s Confer !! .........................................................................................35 The Second Meeting ..............................................................................53 Blest Be the Tie That Binds ..................................................................57 The Other Pre-War Conferences .........................................................59 The Post-War Revival ............................................................................65 Vale Haag ................................................................................................73 The CHSA-SEAC Years (1960–1979)..................................................77
    [Show full text]
  • Bradley Parker 2018 Green Camp Paper
    Bradley parker MEMPHIS STORM WATER GREEN CAMP 2018 “Water Quality Affect Upon Wildlife Populations found within Natural and Man-made Wetlands Located in the Memphis and Surrounding Areas” A ct the Wildlife WETLAND Exploration Week of June 11 - 15 SUMMER - 2018 “Does pollution and Water Quality Affect the Wildlife Populations found within both Natural, Man-made, and Channelized Wetlands found within the Memphis and Surrounding Areas?” Types of Wetlands: Natural and Man-made A wetland is one of several types of biomes found in areas having high humidity, may or may not contain large amounts of animal and plant life that is diverse and expresses characteristics adapted to the dryness and wetness of the habitats. Wetlands occur in depressed land areas called basins that are natural a result of land topography or are designed by man, created to house organisms while working as a greenway for improved human health conditions and pollution controls. Trees grow where the ground is wet part of the year and as the ground dries, new life enters and co-exist within a cycle of seasonal rainfall conditions. All wetlands are imperative for the filtration processes working to decrease toxins and chemical pollution found on both land and in water. Wetlands serve as a pollution interception, toxic residue processing and removal of waste. Wetlands are also used for recreational, aesthetics, and educational purposes and provide homes called habitats for many diverse species of organisms. The flora and fauna thrive and adapt within a wetland environment that consist by seasonal conditions produced by weather conditions of dryness and wetness and are associated with storm and rainwater runoff, drainage, pond, river, and pool overflows, man- induced water channeling, flooding and some processes associated with drainage waste collection and disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Stormwater Monitoring Plan Unincorporated Shelby County, Tennessee May 1, 2018
    2018 Stormwater Monitoring Plan Unincorporated Shelby County, Tennessee May 1, 2018 The Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) encompassed by unincorporated Shelby County, Tennessee (Tracking No. TNS075663) includes portions of four (4) distinct HUC_8 Watersheds, as shown on Figure 1. These watersheds include the following: 1. The Loosahatchie River Watershed (HUC_8 08010209) 2. the Wolf River Watershed (HUC_8 08010210) 3. the Nonconnah Creek Watershed (HUC_8 08010211), and 4. the Mississippi River Watershed (HUC_8 08010100) Figure 1 HUC_8 Watersheds Shelby County, Tennessee The land uses present in each of these watersheds are extremely diverse, including agricultural/pastures, woodlands, both low and high density residential, and commercial/industrial. In addition to the various land uses encountered within the Shelby County MS4, a large percentage of the runoff in the watersheds can be attributed to MS4’s belonging to other government entities. The Loosahatchie River Watershed receives runoff from Fayette County and Tipton County in Tennessee, Naval Support Activities Mid South, and from the municipalities of Memphis, Arlington, Lakeland, Bartlett and Millington, TN. The Wolf River Watershed receives runoff from Fayette County, TN, northern Mississippi, and from the municipalities of Memphis, Bartlett, Lakeland, Germantown, and Collierville, TN. The Nonconnah Creek Watershed receives runoff from Fayette County, TN, from Marshall and Desoto 2018 Stormwater Monitoring Plan Unincorporated Shelby County, Tennessee Counties in Mississippi, from the municipalities of Germantown, and Collierville, TN. The Mississippi River Watershed receives runoff from the eastern floodplain of the Mississippi River from the southwest corner of Shelby County, TN to the confluence of the Ohio River at Cairo, IL.
    [Show full text]