<<

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Engineering and Technical Committee Thursday, February 7, 2019 1:30 PM UT Health Science Center – Student Alumni Building 800 Madison Avenue - Memphis,

Note: Please fill out a comment card and return it to an MPO staff member located at the Sign-In Table to be given the opportunity to speak on any of the agenda items. Comment cards must be returned before the agenda item is brought to the floor. You will be given up to two minutes to provide your comments.

1) Call to Order

2) Approval of November 1, 2018 Minutes  ACTION

3) Memphis MPO’s Administrator’s Report a) 2018 State of the MPO Annual Report b) 2018 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Biennial Report c) FY 2020-21 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Major Planning Activities List d) MPO Unobligated Balance (TN) – Update e) FY 2020-23 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – Update f) 2019 Transportation Management Area (TMA) Certification

4) Memphis Urban Area MPO and West Memphis MPO Cooperative Agreement  ACTION Approval of a cooperative agreement between the Memphis MPO and the West Memphis MPO for coordination of transportation planning activities, as required by 23 CFR 450.314

5) Tri-State Umbrella Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)  ACTION Approval of an MOU between the Memphis MPO, West Memphis MPO, TDOT, TDEC, MDOT, MDEQ, ARDOT, ADEQ, MATA, and the Shelby County Health Department for coordination of the transportation planning process within the Memphis, TN-MS-AR Urbanized Area, as required by 23 CFR 450.314 (e).

6) FY 2018-19 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Amendment  ACTION a) Develop a Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – MPO Task b) Update Congestion Management Process (CMP) – MPO Task c) Update MPO’s Public Participation Plan (PPP) – MPO Task d) Multimodal Corridor Study (I-55, I-75 & 26 and I-40 &I-81) – TDOT Task

7) Other Business a) Next Scheduled ETC Meeting: May 2, 2019 1:30 pm, Location: UT Health Science Center

8) Adjourn

Page 1 ETC Item: 2

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Engineering and Technical Committee Thursday, November 1, 2018 1:30 PM UT Health Science Center – Student Alumni Building 800 Madison Avenue ‐ Memphis, Tennessee

SUMMARY OF MINUTES Ms. Pragati Srivastava called the meeting to order at 1:30 PM. In addition to Ms. Srivastava the following voting members were present at the meeting: Gary Scruggs TDOT Brian Copeland MDOT Bennie Hopkins DeSoto County Vince Malavasi Horn Lake B. J. Page Olive Branch Shea Skeen Southaven Christopher Pate Oakland Harvey Matheny Piperton Darren Sanders Shelby County Kevin Eason Shelby County Steve Hill Arlington Rick McClanahan Bartlett Frank McPhail Collierville Tim Gwaltney Germantown Emily Harrell Lakeland Stephen Edwards Memphis Randall Tatum Memphis Jason Dixon Millington James Hay MSCAA Scarlet Ponder MATA

The following Ex‐officio members were present:

Eddie Brawley W. Memphis MPO

The following Interested Individuals were present:

Antoine Hawkins TDOT Willie Davidson Horn Lake Terry Glover City of Memphis Sonja Owens SCHD Bob Rogers SCHD Peter Kauffmann Barge Design Solutions Andy Pinkley Burchart Horn Wain Gaskins CCI Mark Grey HDR, Inc Jim Czarnecry HDR, Inc James Collins Kimley‐Horn John Cameron Neel‐Schaffer Greg Dotson Neel‐Schaffer Patrick Neal Pickering Ben Ledsinger SSR Monoochehr Tanhaee SSR Michael Rebick TRC Engineers Inc. Audrey Lewis Waggoner Warren Goodson W.H. Porter

The following MPO Staff members were present: Mavrick Fitzgerald Kate Horton Sajid Hossain Alvan‐Bidal Sanchez Jordan Smith Betty Turner Nick Warren Zylavian Watley Patrick Besselievre

A quorum was present.

Page 2 ETC Item: 2 Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Engineering and Technical Committee Thursday, November 1, 2018 1:30 PM UT Health Science Center – Student Alumni Building 800 Madison Avenue ‐ Memphis, Tennessee 1) Call to Order @ 1:30 PM Ms. Pragati Srivastava called the meeting to order at 1:30 PM.

2) Approval of August 2, 2018 Minutes Mr. Tim Gwaltney moved to approve the minutes as presented; Mr. Stephen Edwards seconded the motion and the motion carried without dissent.

NO DISCUSSION/QUESTIONS

3) Memphis MPO’s Administrator’s Report Ms. Pragati Srivastava gave an overview of the following items: a) FY 2018 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects b) TDOT 3‐Year Project List (FY 2020‐22) c) National Award for Excellence in MPO Coordination and Partnership

NO DISCUSSION/QUESTIONS

4) 2019 Memphis MPO Calendar Mr. James Hay moved to approve the 2019 Memphis MPO Calendar as presented; Mr. Steve Hill seconded the motion and the motion carried without dissent

DISCUSSION/QUESTIONS Mr. Stephen Edwards inquired about the TIP amendment dates on the MPO calendar. Ms. Pragati Srivastava responded that the calendar and would be updated to include the quarterly amendment deadlines.

5) Performance Measures Targets Mr. Mavrick Fitzgerald and Mr. Nick Warren gave a presentation on the Performance Measures Targets: a) PM1 – Safety b) PM2 – Infrastructure Condition c) PM3 – System Performance

Mr. Darren Sanders moved to approve the Performance Measures Targets as presented; Mr. Stephen Edwards seconded the motion and the motion carried without dissent.

DISCUSSION/QUESTIONS Mr. Rick McClanahan asked how the travel time reliability performance measures were calculated. Mr. Nick Warren responded that the targets were established by each respective State DOT and explained the calculations that were used to derive at the targets. Mr. Steve Hill asked if there would be future consequences if the established performance targets were not met. Ms. Pragati Srivastava responded these types of questions have been asked to FHWA since it the PM requirements were established and there are currently no consequences for the MPO’s. Mr. Antoine Hawkins added that there will not be any passed down consequences from the State (DOT) to the MPO’s if the targets are not met and in 2020 there will be a midpoint check in which the targets can be adjusted. 2 Page 3 ETC Item: 2

6) FY 2020‐23 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Criteria Approval Ms. Kate Horton gave a presentation on the FY 2020‐23 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Criteria. Mr. Steve Hill moved to approve the FY 2020‐23 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Criteria as presented; Mr. James Hay seconded the motion and the motion carried without dissent.

DISCUSSION/QUESTIONS Mr. B. J. Page asked if a signalization project includes intersection improvements, would it be considered a signalization project or two different projects? Ms. Pragati Srivastava responded that it would depend on the scale of the project, but it could be submitted as a single signalization application.

7) Livability 2040: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendments Ms. Pragati Srivastava gave an overview of the Livability 2040: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendments. Tennessee i. RTP Amendment: Livability 2040 RTP ID #14 – Union Avenue (US‐79) The City of Memphis is requesting to amend the Livability 2040: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) by removing the Union Avenue (US‐79) Project from the RTP.

ii. RTP Amendment: Livability 2040 RTP ID #314 – Memphis Innovation Corridor The Memphis Area Transit Authority (MATA) is requesting to amend the Livability 2040: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) by changing the horizon year of the Memphis Innovation Corridor Project from 2020 to 2025 and updating the project description.

Mississippi iii. RTP Amendment: Livability 2040 RTP ID #37 – McIngvale Road The City of Hernando is requesting to amend the Livability 2040: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) by changing the horizon year of the McIngvale Road Project from 2035 to 2021 and updating the project termini and length.

iv. RTP Amendment: Livability 2040 RTP ID #112 – Commerce Street Extension (SR‐304) DeSoto County is requesting to amend the Livability 2040: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) by changing the horizon year of the Commerce Street Extension Project from 2020 to 2025 and updating the project description

Mr. B. J. Page moved to approve the Livability 2040: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendments as presented; Mr. Stephen Edwards seconded the motion and the motion carried without dissent

NO DISCUSSION/QUESTIONS

8) FY 2017‐20 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendments: Ms. Pragati Srivastava gave an overview of the FY 2017‐20 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendments. TN Local Road Amendments i. TIP Amendment STBG‐M‐2017‐04: Union Avenue (US‐79) The City of Memphis is requesting to amend the FY 2017‐20 TIP by removing the Union Avenue project.

3 Page 4 ETC Item: 2 MS Local Road Amendments ii. TIP Amendment MS‐LSTP‐2015‐02: Commerce Street Extension (SR‐304) DeSoto County is requesting to amend the FY 2017‐20 TIP by updating the project description.

iii. TIP Amendment MS‐LSTBG‐2017‐01: McIngvale Road The City of Hernando is requesting to amend the FY 2017‐20 TIP by applying construction funding to the project. The amendment will add $4,177,668 in STBG federal funds and $1,954,066 in local funds and $557,506 in HIP federal funds and $139,377 in local funds to FY 2019 for the construction phase of the project. Additionally, the state is providing a $1,000,000 state match for the construction phase of the project.

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Amendments iv. TIP Amendment CMAQ‐2015‐05: Memphis Area Rideshare Program The Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) is requesting to amend the FY 2017‐20 TIP by adding funds to the project. The amendment will add $1,436,120 in CMAQ federal funds to FY 2019 as a continuation of Shelby County Health Department’s current program.

v. TIP Amendment CMAQ‐2017‐04: Greener Premier Taxis and Buses in Memphis The University of Tennessee, Knoxville is requesting to amend the FY 2017‐20 TIP by adding the Greener Premier Taxis and Buses in Memphis Project, which was awarded a 2016 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) grant through the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT). The amendment will add $102,622 in CMAQ‐S federal funds and $108,912 in local funds to FY 2019 to the conversion to alternative fuel for vans and a propane fueling system.

vi. TIP Amendment CMAQ‐2019‐01: Fixed‐Route Bus Electrification and Aerotropolis Shuttle Service The Memphis Area Transit Authority (MATA) is requesting to amend the FY 2017‐20 TIP by adding the Fixed‐ Route Bus Electrification and Aerotropolis Shuttle Service Project, which was awarded a 2017 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) grant through the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT). The amendment will add $4,800,000 in CMAQ‐S federal funds and $1,200,000 in local funds to FY 2019 for new transit service, which will serve the Memphis Aerotropolis/International Airport area.

Transit Amendments vii. TIP Amendment 5309‐2017‐01: Memphis Innovation Corridor The Memphis Area Transit Authority (MATA) is requesting to amend the FY 2017‐20 TIP by updating the project description and applying STBG funding to the Memphis Innovation Corridor Project, for the PE‐N/PE‐ D phases of the project. The amendment will add $4,800,000 in STBG federal funds and $1,200,000 in local funds to FY 2019, which was applied from the City of Memphis Union Avenue (US‐79) Project.

Mr. Darren Sanders moved to approve the FY 2017‐20 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendments as presented; Mr. Steve Hill seconded the motion and the motion carried without dissent.

DISCUSSION/QUESTIONS Mr. Darren Sanders asked if there had been any expenditures on the Greener Premier Taxis and Buses project to date (item 8v.). Ms. Pragati Srivastava responded that there had been no expenditures on this project to date and after final approval, the agency will be able to begin the project. Mr. Rick McClanahan asked about the source of the local match for the project. Ms. Pragati Srivastava responded that the matching funds would come from the project sponsor.

4 Page 5 ETC Item: 2 9) Other Business i. Next Scheduled ETC Meeting: February 7, 2019 1:30 pm, Location: UT Health Science Center

NO DISCUSSION/QUESTIONS

10) Adjourn @ 2:17 PM

Mr. B. J. Page moved to adjourn; Mr. Stephen Edwards seconded the motion, and the meeting was adjourned at 2:17 PM.

Note: The meeting minutes are a summary of the meeting. If you would like to review the tape recording of the entire meeting you may do so by scheduling an appointment with Kate Horton, Transportation Planner at (901) 636‐7218.

5 Page 6 ETC Item: 3a

STATE OF THE MPO 2018 REPORT OF THE MEMPHIS URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO)

Page 7 ETC Item: 3a

This document is available in accessible formats (such as foreign language versions or large-print and gray-scale versions, among others) when requested ten (10) calendar days in advance.

This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and is prepared in cooperation with and financial assistance from the following public entities: the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT), the Department of Transportation (MDOT), as well as the City of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee, and DeSoto County, Mississippi. This financial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the funding agencies.

It is the policy of the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) not to exclude, deny, or discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, immigration status, sex, gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, age, religion, veteran status, disability, or any other characteristic protected under applicable federal or state law in its hiring or employment practices, or in its admission to, access to, or operations of its programs, services, or activities. For any and all inquiries regarding the application of this accessibility statement and related policies, please contact Alvan-Bidal Sanchez, at 901-636-7156 or [email protected].

Note: The photographs used in the document are for illustrative purposes only. Photographs used were submitted to the Memphis MPO by the public.

Page 8 ETC Item: 3a

Welcome to the Memphis Staff presented to the Bay Urban Area MPO! JAN Area Active Transportation Working Group Meeting The Memphis Urban Area MPO witnessed another exciting year in 2018, in which the MPO received national recognition for its efforts to FEB 1st Quarter ETC and TPB cultivate strong coordination and collaboration Meetings Held in several project’s and practices. 7 Public Workshops held across the region to kick-off Livability 2050 MAR The Memphis MPO completed and made significant process in the development of several of its major plans and studies, 2nd Quarter ETC and TPB most notably the Livability 2050: Regional APR Meetings Held Transportation Plan, which is expected to be System Performance Targets completed in 2019. for the Tr-State Region Adopted The Memphis MPO bolstered its efforts to MAY Staff presented at the 2018 TN MPO Planning Conference track the condition and performance of the Staff presented on the Talking region’s transportation system through the Freight Webinar Series establishment of performance targets for the JUNE INFRA Grant Awarded to Joint new federally required performance measures. TDOT/Memphis MPO The establishment of these targets will enhance Application for Lamar Avenue the MPO’s data driven approach towards providing funding for transportation projects in JULY the future.

Transportation plays an essential role in the AUG 3rd Quarter ETC and TPB daily lives of residents and businesses. 2019 Meetings Held is expected to be another pivotal year for the Memphis MPO. We would encourage

Staff presented at the 2018 you to stay connected with us and take the SEPT TAPA Fall Conference opportunity to engage and provide feedback Memphis MPO receives a on the MPO’s planning process! National Award at the 2018 AMPO Annual Conference OCT Staff presented at the 2018 MS Statewide MPO Meeting Round Two Public Workshops held for Livability 2050 NOV 4th Quarter ETC and TPB Meetings Held Safety, Infrastructure Condition, and System Performance Targets Adopted DEC PRAGATI SRIVASTAVA, AICP MPO Administrator

Page 9 ETC Item: 3a

Table of Contents

Who We Are...... 6 Our Role...... 6 Purpose...... 6 1.0 Regional Demographics...... 7

Outreach...... 10 Staff Participation...... 10 Conferences & Trainings/Workshops...... 11 Reach of MPO Activities...... 12 Website Performance...... 13 Plans & Studies...... 14 2.0 Local Highlights...... 15 Honors & Awards...... 17 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects...... 18

Regional Transportation Plan...... 20 Transportation Improvement Program...... 22 Upcoming Plans & Projects...... 23 3.0 Performance Measures...... 24

2019 MPO Calendar...... 26 MPO Boards & Committees...... 26 MPO Contact Information...... 27 4.0 Connect With Us...... 28

Page 10 ETC Item: 3a

1.0 Introduction

Page 11 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO Who We Are The Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (Memphis MPO), created in 1977, is a regional, multi-jurisdictional agency that is responsible for the planning and programming of Long- Range Transportation facilities in the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA).

The Transportation Policy Board (TPB), is comprised of officials representing the local jurisdictions, States and transportation agencies within the region. The planning boundary covers 18 municipalities and all, or parts, of 4 counties in 2 states.

The MPO carries out a comprehensive, continuing, and cooperative planning process within the Metropolitan Planning Area that is defined by the MPO Boundary. Our Role The transportation system plays a vital role in the everyday life of the region’s residents, whether in creating access to jobs and growing our economy, ensuring safe routes to school, or allowing more sustainable transportation choices. Through the Memphis MPO planning process, we set the priorities for the future of transportation in our region, linking dollars invested with the goals and values of the community. Purpose of the State of the MPO Report In its second year as a report, the State of the MPO Report provides a broad overview of the activities performed by the MPO in the previous calendar year. It includes:

• A summary of all outreach performed by the MPO • An overview of significant milestones and achievements of the MPO • An update on MPO and member agency ongoing and future projects that have been completed or will begin/continue in the next calendar year.

Copies of this and previous reports can be found by visiting the Memphis MPO’s Public Participation Webpage.

6 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 12 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO Regional Demographics

The figures below display the demographic 2.6% 1.8% 0.3% 2.1% composition of the population residing American Indian or within the Memphis MPO’s Planning Area. Alaskan Native The Memphis MPO collects and uses this Asian data to: Black or African 45.0% American Race White • Ensure compliance with Title VI, 48.3% Environmental Justice, and other non- Other discrimination laws and regulations; Two or More Races • Achieve the Memphis MPO’s Title VI Goals and Objectives; • Identify the transportation needs of various communities throughout the region; 6.6% • Identify effective outreach strategies for the various communities throughout the Hispanic/ Latino region. Ethnicity Non-Hispanic According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), the population residing within the 93.4% Memphis MPO Planning Area grew to approximately 1,146,405 in 2017. U.S. Census Bureau: ACS 5- Year Estimates (2013-2017) Sex by Age U.S. Census Bureau: ACS 5- Year Estimates (2013-2017)

> 84 80 to 84 75 to 79 70 to 74 65 to 69 60 to 64 55 to 59 50 to 54 45 to 49 40 to 44 35 to 39 30 to 34 25 to 29 20 to 24 15 to 19 10 to 14 5 to 9 < 5

50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000

Female: 52.2% Male: 47.8%

Memphis Urban Area MPO 7 | 28 Page 13 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO Regional Demographics The figure below compares the estimated travel time to work and vehicle ownership by household for the Memphis, TN-MS-AR MSA to five “peer” cities throughout the United States. According the 2017 ACS, it is estimated that:

• Nearly 40% of workers 16 and over throughout the Memphis, TN-MS-AR MSA reported that their average commute times were 19 minutes or less • Approximately 7.7% of households throughout the Memphis, TN-MS-AR MSA do not have access to a personal vehicle.

Travel Time to Work U.S. Census Bureau: ACS 5- Year Estimates (2013-2017)

New Orleans, LA 10.6% 30.6% 22.3% 18.1% 10.3% 8.1%

Nashville, TN 9.4% 26.8% 22.3% 19.1% 14.3% 8.0%

Memphis, TN-MS-AR 10.4% 28.5% 26.2% 20.3% 10.7% 3.9%

Birmingham, AL 9.7% 27.1% 23.8% 19.8% 13.2% 6.5%

Atlanta, GA 7.3% 22.8% 20.0% 19.5% 17.0% 13.4%

9 Minutes or Less 10-19 Minutes 20-29 Minutes 30-39 Minutes 40-59 Minutes 60 Minutes or More

Vehicle Ownership by Household U.S. Census Bureau: ACS 5- Year Estimates (2013-2017)

New Orleans, LA 10.4% 38.8% 36.5% 10.6% 3.8%

Nashville, TN 4.8% 31.1% 40.3% 16.5% 7.3%

Memphis, TN-MS-AR 7.7% 35.9% 36.5% 13.8% 6.0%

Birmingham, AL 6.2% 32.7% 37.4% 16.1% 7.7%

Atlanta, GA 6.0% 33.3% 39.3% 15.0% 6.4%

No vehicle available 1 vehicle available 2 vehicles available 3 vehicles available 4 or more vehicles available

8 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 14 ETC Item: 3a

2.0 Highlights

Page 15 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO Outreach 2018 was a big year for the MPO in terms of public engagement! Over 50 meetings were held across the MPO Planning Area, giving residents and 50+ stakeholders an opportunity to engage. Meetings The development of the Livability 2050: Regional Transportation Plan played a big role in increasing engagement across the region. Also in 2018, over 500+ attendees 500+ were tracked through our public and stakeholder meetings. Attendees

The MPO also maintained our Constant Contact email lists, sending over 1,900 residents our quarterly newsletter, and 80+ achieving a 31% open rate for emails! The percentage of emails where a hyperlink Review Days was clicked (20%) was above the industry standard of 4-8%. 31% Open Rate MPO Staff Participation The staff of the Memphis MPO are engaged in multiple tasks and activities at a local, regional, and national level. These include working groups and committees that encourage a safe and efficient built environment, to webinars and workshops that build MPO capacity in the latest trends and best practices. Below is a snapshot of the activities staff participated in.

47 54 Meetings Webinars Compared to 47 in 2017 Compared to 31 in 2017 29 10 Conference Trainings/ Calls Workshops Compared to 15 in 2017 Compared to 17 in 2017

10 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 16 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO Conferences & Trainings/Workshops Staff of the Memphis MPO regularly attend conferences and trainings/workshops to build staff capacity and share the progress of MPO products and processes. 2018 remained a busy year for MPO staff as they attended conferences, meetings, and webinars for state and national organizations. MPO staff were present at the 2018 Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO) Annual Conference and presented at both state conferences put on by the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) and Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT). Below are other conferences and workshops MPO staff have attended and presented at:

2018 AMPO Annual Conference San Antonio, TX

FHWA Peer Exchange - Safety Chicago, IL

2018 TN MPO 2018 TN Planning Conference Bike Summit Chattanooga, TN Nashville, TN

2018 TAPA Fall AMPO CV/AV Conference Symposium Kingsport, TN Denver, CO

2018 MS Statewide MPO Meeting Jackson, MS

NTI Performance- FHWA National Bay Area Active FHWA Talking Based Planning & Dialogue - Highway Transportation WG Freight Webinar Programming Automation Webinar Series Atlanta, GA Philadelphia, PA

Memphis Urban Area MPO 11 | 28 Page 17 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO Reach of MPO Activities MPO Outreach With the development of the Livability 2050: Events Attendees Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) beginning 617 in 2018, the MPO saw an increase in meetings 557 517 and attendees from public and stakeholder outreach. These numbers track with 2014 and 2015, when the MPO was last updating the 257 240 RTP and numerous other multimodal plans.

47 24 23 55 The MPO’s website continued to see steady 22 traffic in 2018. An additional milestone was 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 reached when in late 2018 over 1,000,000 website hits were recorded. MPO Website Visitors

The MPO’s Social Media channels continued 145,191 to be utilized for regular updates on plans, 124,922 projects, and transportation-related news. Facebook “Likes” and Twitter Followers 94,509 continued to increase at a regular pace. 65,753 Additionally, YouTube Views began to be 45,612 tracked in 2017, providing a glimpse into another important metric of outreach. After estimating views in 2014-2016, 2018 saw the 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 largest percentage increase in views over the period. MPO Social Media

Twitter Facebook YouTube Media Appearances continued to be tracked by 2,968 MPO Staff. An additional two ‘Press Releases’ were tracked as a result on the ongoing 2,270 1,796 Livability 2050: RTP development. ‘Speaker 1,568 Slots’ posted numbers more in line with 1,330 previous years, while ‘Newspaper Mentions’ 1,186 972 1,042 returned to normal levels from their 2017 peak. 867 967 398 145 204 291 360

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 MPO Media Appearances

Speaker Slot Newspaper Mention Press Release Television Mention

24

13 9 7 8 8 5 4 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 2

2015 2016 2017 2018

12 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 18 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO MPO Website Performance The Memphis MPO uses Google Analytics to measure traffic and users to its website, memphismpo.org. Additionally, a tracker on the website shows the number of hits and visitors in real time. MPO Staff can evaluate the performance of the site across days, weeks, 1,000,000+ and months. hits to our website

MPO staff regularly update the website to provide the latest information to residents, local jurisdictions, and federal/state partners. In addition to regular updates, new webpages for Performance Measures, the Livability 2050: RTP, and the FY 2020-23 TIP were created to better engage with the public, stakeholders, and partners.

2018 saw the MPO celebrate a great milestone, over 1,000,000 hits were recorded to our website!

The percentage of traffic to the Memphis MPO’s website from Tablet devices also Desktop (84.9%) increased to 3.5% from the previous year’s 2%. However, visits by desktop (84.9%) remain the Mobile (11.6%) predominant way visitors access the site. Tablet (3.5%)

Users Year 300

200

100

0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2017 2018

In 2018, the Memphis MPO’s website saw 7,100+ users to its website, a 27.4% increase over the previous year. The performance of the Memphis MPO’s website also improved in terms of the number of sessions and the duration of the session. There were noticeable increases in web traffic in January and September-December compared to similar times last year. One of the most visited pages in 2017 was the MPO’s Interactive Webmap, a consistent trend since its unveiling.

Memphis Urban Area MPO 13 | 28 Page 19 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO 2018 Congestion Management Process Report The Memphis MPO has completed its 2018 CMP Report, which provides accurate and up-to-date information on transportation system performance. The biennial CMP Report provides a snapshot of the region’s congestion and mobility issues by reviewing the following: • Congestion Level • Memphis Area Transit Authority Ridership • Memphis Area Rideshare Program Ridership • Level of Travel Time Reliability • Truck Travel Time Reliability Index • Travel Time Index • Annual Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay Per Capita • Non-Single Occupancy Travel

2018 Title VI Report & Limited English Proficiency Plan As part of its general planning and programming process, the Memphis MPO strives to involve as broad a cross-section of the population and the region as possible.

The MPO’s Title VI Report and Limited English Proficiency Plan document and describe efforts undertaken by the MPO to involve various communities in the transportation planning process, and maintain compliance with federal, state, and local nondiscrimination regulations and policies.

Each is updated on a regular basis to coincide with FHWA & FTA’s Federal Certification every four-years.

2017 Bicycle & Pedestrian Report The Memphis MPO has completed its 2017 Bicycle and Pedestrian Report, which: • Highlights recent regional efforts to promote bicycle and pedestrian educational campaigns and programs • Provides an update on the progress made in the implementation of projects included in the MPO’s 2014 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan • Includes an analysis of the bicycle and pedestrian crashes that occurred throughout the region from 2014-2017

14 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 20 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO Local Highlights

Lamar Avenue Awarded INFRA Grant! A joint application submitted by the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) and the Memphis MPO for Lamar Avenue was awarded a $71.2 million grant from the USDOT as part of the Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Program!

It was one of 26 projects selected from 235 communities across the United States. The grant will be used to fund improvements which will reduce congestion, increase capacity, and ultimately ensure Lamar Avenue and Memphis will continue to play an integral role in the nation’s freight network.

DeSoto County Awarded BUILD Grant for Holly Springs Road! DeSoto County has been awarded a $13 million grant from the USDOT as part of the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Transportation Grants program for Holly Springs Road!

The project was one of 91 projects selected from 851 applications! The project will improve approximately 2.6 miles of Holly Springs Road, including improvements which will prevent costly damage from future flooding, improve safety and efficiency along the corridor, and provide continued critical access to jobs and essential services for residents.

I-269 DeSoto County, MS Ribbon-Cutting In October 2018, the final 9-mile segment of I-269 opened, marking the completion of an approximately 30-mile bypass associated with I-69. I-269 will serve as a connection between I-40 in Tennessee and I-55 in Mississippi, and not only relieve traffic congestion on I-55, but to also serve as a connector with Interstate 22 and U.S. Highways 61 and 72.

MemFix4 - I-240 Bridge Replacement In June 2018, construction commenced on the $54 million bridge rehabilitation project to replace or repair 4 bridges over Interstate 240 that were originally built in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. The project, led by TDOT, is intended to provide a safer commute for approximately 50,000 vehicles that travel across the bridges, and is expected to be completed June 2019.

Memphis Urban Area MPO 15 | 28 Page 21 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO

Drone Integration Pilot Program The Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority (MSCAA) was one of 10 areas selected to participate in the U.S. DOT’s’s Drone Integration Pilot Program. The program is meant to help the U.S. DOT and the FAA develop a regulatory framework to allow low-altitude operations, night operations, flights over people, flights beyond the pilot’s line of sight and detect-and-avoid technologies.

Bike Share Launches in Mid-South 2018 was a big year for bike share, as the Mid-South saw multiple systems launch in the region! Explore Bike Share deployed approximately 600 bikes at 60 stations throughout the cities of Memphis, Tennessee and West Memphis, . While Germantown deployed 10 bikes across two stations and Hernando unveiled 12 trikes and bikes for their free adult bike share program!

Memphis International Airport Modernization Memphis International Airport (MEM) is embarking on a new plan to modernize and consolidate airline and retail operations in Concourse B. The $245 million modernization, including a new concourse and upgrades such as moving walkways, children’s play area, performance stage, and lounge for patients at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, is expected to take 30 months.

Hernando DeSoto River Park Ribbon Cutting The DeSoto County Government Board of Supervisors hosted a ribbon cutting in May for the Hernando DeSoto River Park. It’s the only park and trail system in the county with public access to the , and it now boasts a new paved parking lot, a new gazebo with picnic tables, new security cameras, historical markers, a bike repair station, and an unparalleled look at the beauty of the Mississippi.

Port of Memphis Master Plan The Port of Memphis Master Plan was completed in the Fall of 2018. The Master Plan identifies nearly $30 million in infrastructure upgrades. This master plan will serve as the vision of the Port of Memphis, focusing on needs and opportunities in both the near and long-term future.

Transit Vision The City of Memphis and Innovate Memphis, in partnership with the Memphis Area Transit Authority (MATA), completed a Draft Transit Vision in the Spring of 2018. The Transit Vision includes recommendations to redesign the transit network and is intended to improve the transit system’s ability to provide access to jobs, people, and opportunities.

16 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 22 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO Honors & Awards 2018 National Award for Excellence in MPO Coordination and Partnership

The Memphis MPO has been awarded the 2018 National Award for Excellence in MPO Coordination and Partnership by the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO) for our strong collaborative projects and practices! With support from the West Memphis MPO, Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT), Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT), Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT), and the Federal Highway Administration – TN Division, the MPO submitted an application highlighting multiple collaborative projects by the MPO, including:

CMAQ PM3 Subpart G: Traffic Congestion Working Group The Memphis MPO spearheaded the process by coordinating a highly technical discussion between three FHWA Divisions, three State DOTs, and the West Memphis MPO to set single-unified targets for the tri-state Memphis, TN-MS-AR Urbanized Area.

Greater Memphis Regional Freight Plan The Memphis MPO’s Greater Memphis Regional Freight Plan went beyond the MPO’s boundaries to encompass the tri-state area, achieving a truly regional perspective, while also including truckers and residents across the entire region.

Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan The Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan involved a partnership between three states, two MPOs, and dozens of agencies across twenty counties focusing on needs of seniors, persons with disabilities, and communities of low-income.

Memphis Urban Area MPO 17 | 28 Page 23 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO FY 2018 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Fund obligations are a measure of the progress being made on a project. As such, the Annual List of Obligated Projects is prepared at the end of the federal fiscal year (October - September) to identify which projects got funding obligated during the fiscal year. The total obligation for FY 2018 was $191,892,788.15, below is a summary of 2018 federally obligated projects, to see the full document visit the Annual List of Obligated Project’s Webpage on the Memphis MPO’s website. FY 2018 Funding Obligations by Project Type

3.0% 1.5% 0.6% Tennessee Road Projects 4.2% TN Road Projects (36.5%) (36.5%) and Mississippi MS Road Projects (29.0%) Road Projects (29.0%) had the highest pecentages 6.2% TN ITS/Signal/Safety Projects (11.7%) of federal funds obligated 7.3% 36.5% Transit Projects (7.3%) in FY 2018, totaling $125,689,827.30 or 65.5%. Project MS Bridge Projects (6.2%) Tennessee ITS/Signal/ 11.7% Type TN Bridge Projects (4.2%) Safety had the third TN Bicycle & Pedestrian Projects (3.0%) highest percentage of federal funds obligated MS Bicycle & Pedestrian Projects (1.5%) 29.0% with $22,372,255.15 or MS ITS/Signal/Safety Projects (0.6%) 11.7% followed by Transit Projects with $14,068,375 or 7.3%. The road project category includes resurfacing, widening, new road, and interchange project types.

FY 2018 Funding Obligations by Funding Type

2.1% 1.0% Surface Transportation STBG/STP - Surface Transportation Block Block Grant Program Grant Program (48.5%) (STBG, formerly STP) had 5.8% NHPP - National Highway Performance the largest total obligated Program (31.9%%) 10.2% funds in the amount CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation and Air of $92,979,732.90, or Quality Program (10.2%) 48.5% of the obligated Funding 48.5% 5307 - FTA Urbanized Area Formula funds for the Memphis Type Program (5.8%) MPO Planning Area. The TA/TAP - Transportation Alternatives second largest funding 31.9% Program (2.1%) source was National

HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Highway Performance Program (1.0%) Program (NHPP) funds, totaling $61,172,108.29 or 31.9% of the obligated funds for the MPO area. The following three (3) funding sources represent more than 1% of the total obligations: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) at $19,622,931.28 or (10.2%), 5307 FTA Urbanized Area Formula Program at $11,060,000.00 or 5.8%, and Transportation Alternatives (TA/TAP) at $4,029,112.00 or (2.1%).

18 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 24 ETC Item: 3a

3.0 Moving Forward

Page 25 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO

The Memphis MPO is currently developing the region’s next long-range transportation plan, Livability 2050: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).

The region’s current long- range transportation plan, Livability 2040: RTP was adopted by the Transportation Policy Board (TPB) on January 28, 2016, and is now being updated with a horizon year of 2050.

One of the first actions taken is the development and adoption of Goals and Objectives based on the five Planning Themes (pictured below), which describe the strategic direction of the region and plan. They were developed based on public and stakeholder outreach, and were approved by the TPB on February 22, 2018.

A public survey was developed in both English and Spanish for residents to share their priorities and shape the development of the Livability 2050: RTP. 337 30 Online Paper Open over 2 months, over 350 Surveys Surveys responses were recorded! A unique component of the survey was an interactive map, giving residents the 3,738 ability to mark where transportation 735 improvements would be the most Unique Map beneficial. 700+ markers were placed Data Markers across the entire region, ranging from Points bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure to intersection safety!

20 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 26 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO

Over 80 unique residents have engaged at twelve public workshops that have been held across the MPO Planning Area! The workshops have given residents from all four counties the opportunity to engage in the development of the Livability 2050: RTP. Which of the three (3) do you value the most?

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% The Memphis MPO engaged with the public, stakeholders, and local Reliable travel times 20% jurisdictions by using interactive polling and an online survey to Safe roadways 26% gauge the priorities of the region.

Reliable public tranportation 13% Throughout the process, Safe Roadways, Well-Maintained Short travel distances 6% Infrastructure, and Reliable Travel Better conditions for biking Times were selected as the three and walking 13% most valued by respondents.

Well-maintained infrastructure 23%

Livability 2050: RTP Funding Snapshot During the development of the Livability 2050: RTP, maintenance, system preservation, and safety have been identified as priorities Syst em 32% by local jurisdictions, stakeholders, Maintenance (58%) and the public. These priorities, Special Projects REGIONAL in addition to an identification of (9%) FUNDING needs, helped shape the general 58% Roadway and funding breakdown with ‘System Transit Capital (32%) 9% Maintenance’ a significant piece of the funding available. This funding breakdown is subject to change as the plan develops.

Memphis Urban Area MPO 21 | 28 Page 27 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO

The Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is currently in the FY 2023 TIP development of the TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year (FY) 2020- 2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which will cover the period from October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2023.

The TIP is a four year, fiscally constrained, short range program, which provides a prioritized list of multimodal transportation projects within the Metropolitan Planning Area. It supports the long-range vision of the Regional Transportation Plan.

As part of the development process, the MPO issued a call for projects from eligible project sponsors. Projects submitted will be evaluated and scored using the TIP Project Ranking Criteria, which were approved by the Transportation Policy Board on November 15, 2018. Eligible project sponsors had the opportunity to apply for multiple project types, including:

Road Resurfacing Signal Bike/Ped Bridge Safety Plans

The funding available to Tennessee and FUNDING AVAILABLE Mississippi jurisdictions totals $185.4 million, which (Over 4 Years) will decrease as current projects move forward.

Opportunities for public involvement will occur throughout the development of the FY 2020-23 TIP. Along with the Federal and State agencies, the public will have the opportunity to review TN MS the draft TIP document in the Summer of 2019, before final approval. During this public review period, meetings will be held across the MPO $164.6 $20.8 Planning Area. Find more information by visiting the Memphis MPO’s FY 2020-23 TIP Webpage. Million Million Note: Amount will decrease as current projects move forward.

DEC JAN FEB-MAR MAY JUN-JUL SEPT JAN 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2020

Call for Projects Projects Submitted Projects Evaluated Approval of TIP Fed/State Agencies, & Adoption of Final Final Opens for Scoring with TIP Criteria Projects Public Review Period TIP Approval

MPO ETC/TPB TDOT/MDOT FHWA/FTA PUBLIC

22 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 28 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO 2020 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan The current 2014 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan was adopted on November 20, 2014 by the Transportation Policy Board (TPB). It relied on four main goals and provided a comprehensive needs analysis of the region’s bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

The Memphis MPO will begin the development of the 2020 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan in 2019, and it is anticipated that the plan will be completed in the Spring or Summer of 2020. The plan will look to identify strategies and projects that improve the safety and mobility of bicyclists and pedestrians throughout the region.

2020 Public Participation Plan The Memphis MPO’s current 2014 Public Participation Plan was adopted by the TPB on November 20, 2014. It followed a rigorous public engagement effort, that affirmed some of the MPO’s practices and provided new ideas for engagement. Following the 2014 PPP, the Memphis MPO integrated monthly tracking into its processes, and developed the Annual State of the MPO Report.

The PPP is updated on an as-needed basis, and its anticipated the MPO will being work on the 2020 PPP in the Summer of 2019. The update will include internal staff evaluations of the effectiveness of the current 2014 PPP, as well as public engagement opportunities.

2020 Congestion Management Process The current 2015 Congestion Management Process (CMP) was adopted by the TPB in August of 2015. The CMP is a systematic and regionally accepted approach for managing congestion that provides accurate and up-to- date information on transportation system performance.

The Memphis MPO intends to begin the development of its 2020 CMP in the Spring or Summer of 2019. This effort will aim to identify new strategies for congestion management and link effective management and operations strategies to the MPO’s planning process.

Memphis Urban Area MPO 23 | 28 Page 29 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO Performance Measures The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) have established a set of rulemakings for implementation of performance-based planning and programming (PBPP). Under the PBPP process, states, transit providers, and MPOs must link investment priorities to the achievement of performance targets.

The Memphis MPO has coordinated with our regional, state, and federal partners to establish performance targets for the MPO Planning Area. Find more information on the Memphis MPO’s Transportation Performance Management Webpages.

Safety Performance Infrastructure System Transit Asset Management Condition Performance Management

• Number of Fatalities • % of Pavements in • Annual Hours of Peak • % of Revenue Vehicles • Fatality Rate Good Condition Hour Excessive Delay Met/Exceeded Useful • Number of Serious (Interstate & NHS) per Capita Life Benchmark Injuries • % of Pavements in • % of Non-Single • % of Non-Revenue • Rate of Serious Injuries Poor Condition Occupancy Vehicle Vehicles Met/Exceeded • Number of Non- (Interstate & NHS) Travel Useful Life Benchmark Motorized Fatalities & • % of Bridges in Good • Total Emissions • % of Facilities with Serious Injuries Condition (NHS) Reduction Condition Rating Below • % of Bridges in Poor • % of Person Miles 3.0 on FTA TERM Scale Condition (NHS) Traveled Providing for • % of (Rail) Track Reliable Travel Times Segments with (Interstate & NHS) Performance • Truck Travel Time Restrictions Reliability Index (Interstate & NHS)

PERFORMANCE MEASURES TIMELINE

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

PM1: Safety

PM2: Infrastructure Pavement & Bridge

PM3: System Performance System Performance, Freight, &CMAQ TAM: Transit

MPO Action Required

24 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 30 ETC Item: 3a

4.0 More Information

Page 31 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO 2019 MPO Calendar The Transportation Policy Board (TPB) of the Memphis MPO adopted the 2019 MPO Calendar at their November

January February March S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 meeting. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 The approved calendar provides for TIP Amendments, April May June S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 Engineering and Technical Committee (ETC) Meetings, and 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Transportation Policy Board (TPB) Meetings on a quarterly 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 July August September basis. S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 Meeting dates and locations are subject to cancellation October November December S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 or modification, please be sure to visit the MPO’s Calendar 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Webpage for the latest information. 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31

Transportation Policy Board (TPB) TIP Amendment Due Date Same Day—Engineering & Technical 1:30 PM—Thursday Committee (10:00AM) Transporta- Engineering & Technical Committee Holiday (ETC) 1:30 PM—Thursday tion Policy Board (1:30PM)

Transportation Policy Board (TPB) The TPB is composed of the principal elected officials of the governmental jurisdictions participating in the Memphis Urban Area Transportation Planning Process, along with the chairpersons of the major providers of local and regional transportation facilities. Engineering and Technical Committee (ETC) The ETC membership includes local jurisdiction engineers, planners or other designated persons who are responsible for planning or implementation of transportation projects within each jurisdiction.

Active Transportation Advisory Committee (ATAC) The ATAC provides guidance and strategy on the planning and implementation of transportation projects as related to bicycle and pedestrian travel, transit and public transportation, accessibility, safety, and community outreach.

Freight Advisory Committee (FAC) The FAC provides a forum for regional freight stakeholders to discuss strategies to aid in the efficient movement of freight and increase collaboration between the public and private sectors regarding freight matters while maintaining a good quality of life. Planning & Land Use Advisory Committee (PLAC) The PLAC is comprised on the planning director, principal planner, or other housing and economic development official for each government entity or major transportation provider in the Memphis MPO region.

Interagency Consultation Committee (IAC) The IAC provides recommendations on measures, projects, and funding sources designed to reduce emissions from motor vehicles. The group also advises the MPO on the conformity of plans and projects with national and statewide air quality standards.

26 | 28 Memphis Urban Area MPO Page 32 ETC Item: 3a 2018 Report | State of the MPO MPO Contact Information

Memphis Urban Area MPO 125 N. Main St., Room 450 Memphis, TN 38103

www.memphismpo.org

P: 901.636.7190 F: 901.636.7272

The Memphis MPO Offices are accessible by multiple MATA Routes and the Main Street Trolley. Bicycle racks and Explore Bike Share are nearby. Metered street parking and paid parking at the Mud Island Garage are available nearby.

Pragati Srivastava Alvan-Bidal Sanchez Administrator Transportation Planner [email protected] [email protected] 901.636.7190 901.636.7156

Sajid Hossain Mavrick Fitzgerald Transportation Planner Transportation Planner [email protected] [email protected] 901.636.7183 901.636.7189

Kate Horton Nick Warren Transportation Planner Transportation Planner [email protected] [email protected] 901.636.7218 901.636.7146

Zylavian Watley Notimba Brooks Transportation Planner Grants Coordinator [email protected] [email protected] 901.636.7216 901.636.7227

Jordan Smith Ann Deberry Transportation Planner Administrative Assistant [email protected] [email protected] 901.636.7130 901.636.7190

Memphis Urban Area MPO 27 | 28 Page 33 ETC Item: 3a

Connect With Us!

Page 34

ETC Item: 3b

2018 Biennial Congestion Management Report

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)

Page 35

ETC Item: 3b

This document is available in accessible formats (such as foreign language versions or large-print and gray-scale versions, among others) when requested ten (10) calendar days in advance.

This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and is prepared in cooperation with and financial assistance from the following public entities: the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Tennessee Department of Trans- portation (TDOT), the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT), as well as the City of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee, and DeSoto County, Mississippi.

This financial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the funding agencies. It is the policy of the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) not to exclude, deny, or discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, immigration status, sex, gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, age, religion, veteran status, disability, or any other characteristic protected under applicable federal or state law in its hiring or employment practices, or in its ad- mission to, access to, or operations of its programs, services, or activities. For any and all inquiries regarding the application of this accessibility statement and related policies, please contact Alvan-Bidal Sanchez, at 901-636-7156 or [email protected].

Page 36

PG. 2 CONGESTION REPORT ETC Item: 3b The Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization has prepared the 2018 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Biennial Report, which examines congestion in the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Area. U.S. Cities Comparison The congestion level measure assesses the increase in overall travel time when compared to a free flow situation. For example, a congestion level of 17% corresponds to 17% additional travel time compared to what the travel time would be in a Free Flow situation. Table 1 compares the 2016 traffic congestion statistics for Memphis to various cit- ies throughout the U.S.

Table 1

Congestion U.S. City Congestion Level Change from Previous Year Morning Peak Evening Peak Rank 1 Los Angeles, CA 45% 4% 62% 84% 12 Atlanta, GA 27% 3% 45% 65% 20 Nashville, TN 23% 1% 41% 62% 21 New Orleans, LA 23% 1% 33% 50% 39 Raleigh, NC 18% 2% 30% 49% 42 Jacksonville, FL 18% 2% 29% 48% 46 Memphis, TN 17% 1% 28% 48% 47 Louisville, KY 17% 0% 23% 46% 59 Birmingham, AL 15% 2% 25% 37% 63 Oklahoma City, OK 14% 0% 24% 32% Source: TomTom Traffic Index, 2016 Transit Ridership The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) provides quarterly and year-to-date estimates of unlinked transit passenger trips for the current and previous years. Unlinked passenger trips are defined as the number of passengers who board public transportation vehicles. Passengers are counted each time they board vehicles, re- gardless of how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination. Figure 1 displays the number of unlinked transit passenger trips for the Memphis Area Transit Authority from 2013-2017.

Figure 1 Memphis Area Transit Authority Ridership 950 850 750 650

550 Trips(000's) 450 350

2014 2015 2016 2017

Source: American Public Transportation Association Page 37

PG. 3 CONGESTION REPORT ETC Item: 3b 2016 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) VMT measures the amount of travel for all vehicles in a geographic region over a given period of time, typically a one year period. Table 2 compares the 2016 Estimated VMT for the Memphis Urbanized Area (UZA) to various Ur- banized Areas throughout the U.S. As shown in the table, approximately 25.2% of the 2016 Daily VMT in the Mem- phis UZA occurred on the Interstate.

Table 2

2016 Estimated Daily % of Estimated Daily 2016 Estimated Daily Vehicle Miles Trav- Vehicle Miles Trav- Urbanized Area Vehicle-Miles of Trav- eled (Thousands) on eled (Thousands) on el (Thousands) Interstate the Interstate

Atlanta, GA 158,141 45,204 28.6%

Birmingham, AL 30,058 11,745 39.1%

Jacksonville, FL 35,688 9,838 27.6% Los Angeles-Long Beach- 279,292 78,395 28.1% Anaheim, CA

Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 22,133 9,957 45.0%

Memphis, TN-MS-AR 29,461 7,414 25.2%

Nashville-Davidson, TN 46,387 15,855 34.2%

New Orleans, LA 18,041 35.9% 6,474 Oklahoma City, OK 31,446 9,162 29.1%

Raleigh, NC 32,824 7,841 23.9%

Data Source: FHWA Policy and Governmental Affairs

2017 –2018 Rideshare Program (Vanpool) The Memphis Area Rideshare, offered through the Shelby County Air Quality Improvement Branch, provides in- formation to individuals and employers to help create transportation options for area workers. The tables below displays details on trip elimination as well as reductions in fuel spending and miles traveled.

Source: Shelby County Air Quality Improvement Branch

Table 3 Table 4

2017 Memphis Area Rideshare Program 2018 Memphis Area Rideshare Program

2017 Trips Eliminated 81,023 2018 Trips Eliminated 73,463

2017 Miles Eliminated 4,699,336 2018 Miles Eliminated 4,260,856

Fuel Saved (Gallons Per Year) 186,481 Fuel Saved (Gallons Per Year) 169,082

Fuel Savings (Dollars Per Year) 419,583 Fuel Savings (Dollars Per Year) 422,704

Carbon Monoxide Reduction (Tons Per 70.2 Carbon Monoxide Reduction (Tons 63.7 Year) Per Year) Page 38

PG. 4 CONGESTION REPORT ETC Item: 3b Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR) Figure 2 and Truck Travel Time Reliability % of Interstate Providing for Reliable Travel Times 99.9% 100.0% 99.3% (TTTR) Index 100.0% 99.2% 96.4% 95.0% LOTTR is defined as the ratio of the longer travel 91.8% 91.3% 89.8% 89.9% 88.9% times (80th percentile) to a “normal” travel time (50th 90.0% 88.5% 87.7% percentile) for a reporting segment. Reporting seg- 85.0% ments represent segments of the U.S. Interstate Sys- 80.0% tem and the U.S. National Highway System (NHS). 75.0%

Data for the these measures is collected from the Na- 70.0% tional Performance Management Research Data Set 65.0%

(NPMRDS). Data for the LOTTR measure is collected 60.0% in 15-minute segments for four time periods; Week- 2014 2015 2016 2017 days from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. (A.M. Peak), 10 a.m. to 4 Memphis MPO MPA Mississippi Tennessee p.m. (Midday), 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. (P.M. Peak), and Data Source: NPMRDS HERE (2014-2015) and NPMRDS INRIX (2016-2017) Weekends from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. In order for a re- porting segment to be considered reliable, it must have a ratio below 1.50 for all four reporting peri- Figure 3 ods. Figure 2 displays the annual average percent- % of Non-Interstate NHS Providing for Reliable age of Interstate providing for reliable travel times Travel Times for the Memphis MPO Metropolitan Planning Area 100.0% (MPA), State of Tennessee, and the State of Mississip- 95.7% 95.2% 95.0% 91.7% 92.5% pi. Figure 3 displays the annual average percentage 90.6% 90.9% 90.0% of Non -Interstate NHS providing for reliable travel 85.2% 85.0% 82.0% times for the Memphis MPO MPA, State of Tennes- 80.0% see, and the State of Mississippi. Figure 7 (Page 6) 75.0% 73.2% 72.6% displays the 2017 annual average LOTTR for all re- 70.0% 68.6% 64.9% porting segments within the Memphis MPO MPA. 65.0% 60.0% TTTR is defined as the ratio of the “longer” truck 2014 2015 2016 2017 travel times (95th percentile) to a “normal” travel Memphis MPO MPA Mississippi Tennessee time (50th percentile) for a reporting segment. Data Data Source: NPMRDS HERE (2014-2015) and NPMRDS INRIX (2016-2017) for the TTTR measure are collected in 15-minute seg- ments for the same four time periods as the LOTTR measure, however, an additional time period; Over- Figure 4 nights from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m., is included to capture overnight truck travel times. The TTTR index is gen- Truck Travel Time Reliability Index erated by multiplying each segment’s largest ratio of the five time periods by the segments length, then 1.70 1.60 dividing the sum of all length-weighted segments by 1.50 1.50 1.43 1.44 the total length of the interstate. There is no Federal- 1.42 1.41 1.38 1.40 1.35 ly defined threshold for determining whether a seg- 1.33 ment provides for reliable truck travel times, howev- 1.30 1.20 1.16 er, a lower TTTR index translates to a higher level of 1.14 1.13 1.13 reliability. Figure 4 displays the TTTR for the Mem- 1.10 phis MPA, the State of Tennessee, and the State of 1.00 2014 2015 2016 2017 Mississippi. Memphis MPO MPA Mississippi Tennessee

Data Source: NPMRDS HERE (2014-2015) and NPMRDS INRIX (2016-2017)

Page 39

PG. 5 CONGESTION REPORT ETC Item: 3b Table 5 Travel Time Index (TTI) 2016 Travel Time The TTI measure is defined as the ratio of travel time Rank Urban Area Index in the peak period to the travel time at free-flow con- ditions. For example, a value of 1.35 indicates that a Los Angeles-Long Beach- 1 1.71 20-minute free-flow trip takes 27 minutes during peak Satna Ana, CA period hours. Table 5 compares the 2016 annual aver- 15 Atlanta, GA 1.31 age TTI for Memphis to various cities throughout the 29 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 1.20 U.S. 33 Nashville-Davidson, TN 1.18 36 Jacksonville, FL 1.16 36 Raleigh-Durham, NC 1.16 42 Louisville, KY-IN 1.15 45 New Orleans, LA 1.14 49 Oklahoma City, OK 1.11 52 Birmingham, AL 1.04 Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics Figure 5 Annual Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay Annual Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay Per Capita for Memphis UZA (TN-MS-AR) (PHED) Per Capita for Memphis UZA 12.0 PHED measures the annual hours of peak hour exces-sive

10.0 10.0 delay per capita on the NHS. The speed threshold for ex- cessive delay is based on the travel time at 20 miles per 8.0 6.6 7.1 7.0 hour or 60% of the posted speed limit, whichever is 6.0 greater, on all reporting segments. Peak travel hours for

4.0 the Memphis MPO are defined as 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. Week-

AnnualHoursof Delay day mornings, and 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. Weekday afternoons. 2.0 Data this the measure is col-lected from the NPMRDS, and 0.0 data reported in the da-taset are collected in 15-minute 2014 2015 2016 2017 epochs for the two peak hour time periods. Data Source: NPMRDS HERE (2014-2015) and NPMRDS INRIX (2016- 2017) Figure 5 displays the annual hours of peak hour exces- sive delay per capita for the Memphis Urbanized Area (TN, MS, AR).

Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle Travel Figure 6

(Non-SOV) % of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle Travel

Non-SOV travel is defined as any travel mode 17.5% 17.2% other than driving alone in a motorized vehicle, 17.0% 16.8% 16.6% 16.5% and Non-SOV travel can include travel via car- 16.4% 16.4% 16.5% 16.3% 16.3% 16.3% pool, van, public transportation, commuter rail, 16.0% 15.9% walking, bicycling, and telecommuting. Data for 15.6% this measure is collected from the most recent 15.5% 15.3% American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year esti- 15.0% mates. Figure 6 displays the annual estimated 14.5% percentage of Non-SOV travel for the Memphis UZA, the State of Tennessee, and the State of Mis- 14.0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 sissippi. Memphis UZA (TN, MS, AR) Mississippi Tennessee Data Source: American Community Survey (ACS)

Page 40

PG. 6 CONGESTION REPORT ETC Item: 3b Figure 7 Level of Travel Time Reliability

Figure 7 displays the 2017 annual average LOTTR for all reporting segments within the Memphis MPO MPA. In order for a reporting segment to be considered reliable, it must have a ratio below 1.50 for all four reporting periods.

For more information about the Memphis MPO’s Congestion Management Process, or for any and all inquires on the Title VI / Accessibility Policies and Procedures of the Memphis MPO,

please visit memphismpo.org

Page 41

ETC Item: 3c

MPO's Current & Future Major Planning Activities FY 2020 (Oct 2019 ‐ Sept 2020) FY 2021 (Oct 2020 ‐ Sept 2021) Project 1st Qtr (Oct 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr ‐ Dec, 2019) (Jan ‐ Mar, 2020) (Apr ‐ Jun, 2020) (Jul ‐ Sep, 2020) (Oct ‐ Dec, 2020) (Jan ‐ Mar, 2021) (Apr ‐ Jun, 2021) (Jul ‐ Sep, 2021) FY 2022‐23 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Air Quality Model Update & Maintenance > * FY 2020 ‐23 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Project Status Tracking * 2055 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) ‐ RFQ & Plan Development * Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan (CHSTP) Update

Regional ITS Architecture Update

Congestion Management Process (CMP) Update > Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update > 2020 Census Particiapant Statistical Area Program (PSAP) Update Public Participation Plan Update > Federal Performance Measures > * eSTIP Implementation * > Project cont'd from FY 2019 * Project cont's into FY 2022

Page 42 ETC Item: 3d

Memphis MPO Unobligated Balance - Tennessee Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Funds

Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Balance $100,000,000

$95,000,000 $94,135,174 Obligations by Project Type $86,018,561 January - December 2018 $89,006,030 $88,718,020 $90,000,000 Road 63.40% $83,909,106 Resurfacing 20.92% $85,000,000 Signalization 14.58% Bridge 0.55% $80,000,000 $82,675,325 $87,046,383 Bike & Pedestrian 0.55% 100.0% $75,000,000 $79,594,825

$70,000,000 $71,018,187

$65,000,000 Jan‐18 Feb‐18 Mar‐18 Apr‐18 May‐18 Jun‐18 Jul‐18 Aug‐18 Sep‐18 Oct‐18 Nov‐18 Dec‐18 Notes: The balance shown is from the end of each month and reflects all of the obligations to date. The October Balance reflects the FY 2019 apportionment of STBG Funds ($17,928,463).

Federal Rescissions starting September 2019

Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Funding - Local MPO STBG funds - WILL NOT be subject to rescission. Rescission will impact state funding sources.

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Funding - Local MPO TA funds - WILL BE subject to rescission. Note: Local TA obligation deadline is July 15, 2019. FY 2019 TA Funds - Applied towards unfunded portion of previous awards.

Action Plan to Reduce Balance To Date

Identified major road projects that could have funding obligations by March 2019 (confirmed with state)

Fund major road projects ready to go to construction by March 2019 Lamar Avenue (Section 1) $10,000,000 COMPLETED Highway 70/Jetway $1,054,400 COMPLETED Airline Road North $3,049,600 Old Brownsville Road $18,400,000 Navy Road Streetscape $2,500,000 Holmes Road East $12,498,397 Germantown Road/ Blvd Intersection $3,280,000 TOTAL: $50,782,397 Note: Projects were confirmed with a formal commitment from the jurisdiction.

Jurisdictions push to obligate smaller groupings projects & current road projects (PE/ROW) Resurfacing Grouping $3,929,443 Signalization Grouping $4,459,500 Bridge Grouping $4,696,584 Bike & Pedestrian Grouping $4,531,603 Road Projects (PE/ROW) $11,959,237 TOTAL: $29,576,367 Note: All funding amounts shown are federal funds.

Next Steps

Regular project status updates from TDOT and jurisdictions

Follow-up as needed to help projects move forward

Page 43 ETC Item: 4 FINAL February 2019

Cooperative Agreement For Coordination of Transportation Planning in the Memphis, TN-MS-AR Urbanized Area Between Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MMPO) And West Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO)

This Cooperative Agreement is made and entered into this ______the day of ______, 2019, by and among the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MMPO) & the West Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO).

Whereas, the U.S. Bureau of Census has identified a tri-state urbanized area of over 1 million population that incorporates portions of the existing planning jurisdictions of MMPO and WMPO and has identified such area as the “Memphis, TN-MS- AR Urbanized Area”.

Whereas, the Federal Regulations require that a MPO be designated to carry out a comprehensive, continuing and coordinated (“3-C”) transportation planning process for urbanized areas with a population of 50,000 or more; and

Whereas, the MMPO, designated by the Governors of Tennessee and Mississippi, and its Transportation Policy Board (TPB) to carry out a continuous, cooperative and comprehensive planning program, as per the provisions of 23 U.S. Code 134 and 49 U.S. Code 5303-06 for the Memphis Urban Area MPO planning area that include parts of areas in Tennessee and Mississippi, including respective portion of the Urbanized Area; and

Whereas, the WMPO, designated by the Governor of Arkansas, and its Policy Committee to carry out a continuous, comprehensive and cooperative transportation planning process for the West Memphis-Marion Area Transportation Study (WMATS), covering the AR portion of the Urbanized area as per the provisions of 23 U.S. Code 134 and 49 U.S. Code 5303- 06; and

Whereas, the MMPO and WMPO actively coordinate transportation planning activities with each other and their respective STATE DOT partners along the border between the States of Tennessee, Mississippi and Arkansas in their respective jurisdictions; and

Whereas, the MMPO and WMPO coordinate planning activities with each other and their respective State DOT partners to carry out such activities cooperatively so that principal metropolitan area planning products reflect consistency with best practices and with the broader areawide goals; and

Whereas, the MMPO and WMPO in coordination with their respective State DOT partners will continue to develop separate transportation plans, programs and projects including, but not limited to the MMPO Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and the WMPO Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Air Quality Conformity Reports/Analysis and Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP); and

Now, therefore, in consideration of these premises and of their mutual and dependent needs, the parties hereto agree as follow:

1. The MMPO and WMPO hereby agree to continue to actively coordinate planning activities and end products but will develop separate transportation plans, programs and projects, share and coordinate transportation performance data, including monitoring and selecting of targets for their respective planning jurisdiction in accordance with Federal performance measure requirements. This coordination will be achieved by periodic meetings and correspondences between the two agencies, such coordination will include but is not limited to, participating in Interagency Consultation (IAC), attending Technical and/or Board Meetings, coordination related to Federal Performance Measures impacting the tri-state area, special studies/plans that are mutually beneficial to both MPOs.

1

Page 44 ETC Item: 4 FINAL February 2019

2. The MMPO and WMPO, in coordination with their respective State DOT partners, will continue to develop separate transportation plans, programs and projects including, but not limited to the MMPO Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and the WMPO Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Air Quality Conformity Reports/Analysis and Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). The planning assumptions such as funding scenarios, growth projections, traffic assumptions, air quality assumptions will be based on the individual MPO boundary. Additionally, when a project crosses the MPO boundary, each MPO will coordinate with their respective State DOTs to ensure consistent planning assumptions for an or any individual project.

3. The WMPO, including the Crittenden County area outside the WMPO planning area, and the MMPO will coordinate their respective air quality conformity analyses and determinations by involvement through each of the MPO’s respective Interagency Consultation Committee (IAC). Additionally, WMPO will follow conformity requirements as established by Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) through their air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP) and MMPO will follow conformity requirements as established by Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) through their air quality SIP in Tennessee portion of non-attainment area and follow Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) through their air quality SIP in Mississippi portion of non- attainment area.

4. The MMPO and WMPO will participate in each other’s Federal Certification Process.

5. In the event of a proposed transportation investment that extends across the boundaries of MMPO and WMPO, the funding for the project will be accounted for in the TIP/STIP and the RTP/MTP of the respective MPOs depending upon the lead agency. If needed, the Interagency Consultation process will be followed to ensure compliance with the air quality conformity process.

6. That the MMPO and WMPO hereby agree to provide notification to each other of any planning and related events and activities that may have significant bearing upon the outcome of transportation system development across the Tri- State multi-modal transportation system.

7. That the MMPO and WMPO hereby agree to resolve conflicts that may arise by decision of a committee consisting of the Administrator of MMPO, the Study Director of WMPO, MMPO Policy Board Chairman and WMPO Policy Committee Chairman, TDOT MMPO Representative, ARDOT WMPO Representative and MDOT MMPO Representative.

In Witness whereof, the hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their proper officers and representative.

2

Page 45 ETC Item: 4 FINAL February 2019

Note: Signatures appear on separate, multiple pages. WEST MEMPHIS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (WMPO)

______Chairman, West Memphis MPO Policy Committee

______Date

3

Page 46 ETC Item: 4 FINAL February 2019

Note: Signatures appear on separate, multiple pages. MEMPHIS URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MMPO)

______Chairman, Transportation Policy Board

______Date

4

Page 47 ETC Item: 5

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE PLANNING, COORDINATION, AND FUNDING PROCEDURES AMONG

MEMPHIS URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION WEST MEMPHIS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & CONSERVATION MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MEMPHIS AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE HEALTH DEPARTMENT

PURPOSE OF THE MOU 1. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is an assimilation of agreements among three States and multiple agencies whereby those agreements themselves address the interagency coordination affecting the transportation planning process for the Memphis TN-MS-AR Transportation Management Area (TMA). This MOU among the following parties (Collectively, the AGENCIES), pursuant to 23 USC 134, 49 USC 5303, and 40 CFR 93: MEMPHIS URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MMPO); WEST MEMPHIS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (WMPO); TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TDOT); MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MDOT); ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ARDOT); TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & CONSERVATION (TDEC); MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (MDEQ); ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (ADEQ); MEMPHIS AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MATA); SHELBY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, TENNESSEE (SCHD) is intended to satisfy the requirement regarding Metropolitan planning agreements in 23 C.F.R. § 450.314(a), which states that “[t]o the extent possible, a single agreement between all of the parties should be developed.” and 23 C.F.R. § 450.314(e), which states “[i]f more than one MPO has been designated to serve an urbanized area there shall be a written agreement among the MPOs, the State(s), and the public transportation operator(s) describing how the metropolitan transportation planning processes will be coordinated to assure the development of consistent metropolitan transportation plans and TIPs across the MPA boundaries, particularly in cases in which a proposed transportation investment extends across the boundaries of more than one MPA.”

PARTIES TO THE MOU 2. Recognizing the geographic and organizational complexities of this three-state urbanized area, this MOU confirms the AGENCIES participation within the Memphis TN-MS-AR Urbanized Area transportation planning process and serves as an umbrella Memorandum of Understanding recognizing a series of agreements (including the state administrative rule in Tennessee1) between the MMPO and the respective state and regional agencies recording their

1 For purpose of this MOU a state administrative rule in Tennessee is included in the term agreement/MOU.

Page 1 of 15

Page 48 ETC Item: 5

individual planning process coordination procedures as well as WMPO and the respective state and regional agencies recording their individual planning process coordination.

3. MMPO is one of two federally designated MPOs for the Memphis TN-MS-AR TMA that share joint responsibilities for the TMA, which encompasses Shelby County, TN, Desoto County, MS and the Crittenden County, AR urbanized area along with portions of Fayette County, TN and Marshall County, MS. MMPO was designated in 1977 and is responsible for the transportation planning activities for Shelby County, TN and Desoto County, MS and portions of Fayette County, TN and Marshall County, MS. WMPO was designated in 1983 and is responsible for the transportation planning activities for the urbanized area of Crittenden County including Interagency Consultation procedures for the entire county.

4. Furthermore, the MMPO is served by two State Departments of Transportation, TDOT and MDOT, two State air quality agencies, TDEC and MDEQ, two Federal Highway Administration Division Offices covering Tennessee and Mississippi, one region of the Federal Transit Administration Region IV, one region of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, one public transit operator, Memphis Area Transit Authority, and one local air quality agency led by SCHD.

5. The WMPO is served by one State Department of Transportation, ARDOT, one State air quality agency, ADEQ, one Federal Highway Administration Division Office covering Arkansas, one region of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Region VI, and one region of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region VI.

AGREEMENT 6. The AGENCIES agree to cooperatively participate in the metropolitan transportation planning and air quality transportation conformity processes for the Memphis TN-MS-AR Urbanized Area, as specified in the UNDERLYING AGREEMENTS referenced in Appendix A.

7. The AGENCIES further agree that the MMPO Transportation Policy Board and the WMPO Policy Committee, serving as the two designated MPOs for the Memphis TN-MS-AR Urbanized Area, shall continue to direct the metropolitan transportation planning and transportation air quality conformity processes for their respective Metropolitan Planning Areas (MPA) and shall facilitate the appropriate federal, state, and local agencies’ active participation including those activities intended to result in the development and approval of three principal products for each of the following: a. A quadrennially-updated 20-year Multimodal Long Range MMPO Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and WMPO Metropolitan Transportation Plan with accompanying United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) air quality conformity determinations b. A 4-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) updated as required by State DOTs with accompanying USDOT air quality conformity determinations; and c. A biennially-updated MMPO Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) and annually updated WMPO UPWP.

Page 2 of 15

Page 49 ETC Item: 5

8. The UNDERLYING AGREEMENTS are intended to provide the basis for coordinated efforts to cooperatively determine each party’s mutual responsibilities in carrying out the metropolitan transportation planning process within the Memphis TN-MS-AR, TMA Urbanized Area. The MOU is not intended to impede the ability of the AGENCIES to modify any of the UNDERLYING AGREEMENTS by those AGENCIES that are a party to a specific underlying agreement alone.

9. The AGENCIES shall resolve all disputes regarding this MOU in a manner consistent with the UNDERLYING AGREEMENTS.

10. This MOU may be amended or terminated by written agreement of the AGENCIES.

11. Any party to this MOU may withdraw from the MOU by giving sixty (60) days written notice to the AGENCIES. In the event that an agency withdraws from this MOU, the rights and responsibilities of the remaining AGENCIES shall remain unchanged with respect to each other.

12. The effective date of this MOU shall be the date on which all of the AGENCIES have executed this MOU.

Page 3 of 15

Page 50 ETC Item: 5

MEMPHIS URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MMPO)

______Chairman, Transportation Policy Board

______Date

Page 4 of 15

Page 51 ETC Item: 5

WEST MEMPHIS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (WMPO)

______Chairman, West Memphis MPO Policy Committee

______Date

Page 5 of 15

Page 52 ETC Item: 5

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TDOT)

______Commissioner

______Date

Page 6 of 15

Page 53 ETC Item: 5

MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MDOT)

______Executive Director

______Date

Page 7 of 15

Page 54 ETC Item: 5

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ARDOT)

______Director

______Date

Page 8 of 15

Page 55 ETC Item: 5

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & CONSERVATION (TDEC)

______Commissioner

______Date

Page 9 of 15

Page 56 ETC Item: 5

MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (MDEQ)

______Executive Director

______Date

Page 10 of 15

Page 57 ETC Item: 5

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (ADEQ)

______Director

______Date

Page 11 of 15

Page 58 ETC Item: 5

MEMPHIS AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MATA)

______Chief Executive Officer

______Date

Page 12 of 15

Page 59 ETC Item: 5

SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE HEALTH DEPARTMENT (SCHD)

______Division Director

______Date

Page 13 of 15

Page 60 ETC Item: 5

Appendix A - Existing Agreements/MOUs Agreement Attachment Title Agency(ies) Year and/or Status IN MOA FOR METROPOLITAN Memphis MPO, PROGRESS 1 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING TDOT & MDOT (currently 2007) MOA FOR ARKANSAS West Memphis 2 2018 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MPO & ARDOT MOA FOR THE USE OF Memphis MPO & 3 METROPOLITAN 2015 MDOT TRANSPORTATION FUNDS MOA FOR MISSISSIPPI Memphis MPO, TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY FHWA, FTA, 4 2013 CONSULTATION AND GENERAL EPA, MDOT & PROVISIONS MDEQ, IN MOU FOR CONSISTENCY AND Memphis MPO & PROGRESS 5 CONFORMITY OF PLANS, West Memphis (currently PROGRAMS, AND PROJECTS MPO 2004) MOA FOR THE DEFINITION AND NEED FOR AMENDMENTS/ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE Memphis MPO & 6 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 2013 TDOT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM/TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR TENNESSEE MOA FOR THE DEFINITION AND NEED FOR AMENDMENTS/ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE Memphis MPO & 7 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 2014 MDOT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM/TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR MISSISSIPPI MOU FOR COOPERATIVELY DEVELOPING, SHARING, AND REPORTING INFORMATION Memphis MPO, 8 2018 RELATED TO PERFORMANCE TDOT, & MATA MEASURES AND PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Page 14 of 15

Page 61 ETC Item: 5

MOU FOR COOPERATIVELY DEVELOPING, SHARING, AND REPORTING INFORMATION Memphis MPO & 9 2018 RELATED TO PERFORMANCE MDOT MEASURES AND PERFORMANCE TARGETS MOA FOR TRANSPORTATION Memphis MPO & 10 PLANNING COORDINATION AND 2014 MATA COOPERATION 11 MOU-DATA SHARING OF CRASH WMPO & ARDOT 2017 DATA MOA-DEVELOPMENT AND 12 SHARING INFORMATION AND WMPO & ARDOT 2018 REPORTING PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS 13 MOA AGREEMENT -AIR QUALITY WMPO, INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION CRITTENDEN PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPMENT COUNTY, CITY 2005 OF STATE TIP AND OF WEST TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY MEMPHIS, DETERMINATION ARDOT, ADEQ, FTA, FHWA & EPA 14 RULE 1200-3-34-.01 IN THE MEMPHIS MPO. 2012 OFFICIAL COMPILATION OF THE MSCHD, TDEC, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF TDOT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE “TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS “ 2

2 Note again the position taken in footnote 1 that the Tennessee rule adopted into the State Implementation Plan is serving as one of the attached agreements, although more than an agreement by nature. Page 15 of 15

Page 62

ETC Item: 6

AMENDED FEBRUARY 21, 2019

Page 63

ETC Item: 6

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Department of Regional Services

125 North Main Street, Suite 450

Memphis, TN 38103

901.576.7190 (phone)

901.576.7272 (fax)

www.memphismpo.org

Page 64 ETC Item: 6

This document is available in accessible formats when requested ten (10) calendar days in advance.

This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and is prepared in cooperation with and inancial assistance from the following public entities: the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT), the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT), as well as the City of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee and DeSoto County, Mississippi. This inancial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this document do not necessarily relect the oficial view or policies of the funding agencies.

It is the policy of the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, national origin or disability in its hiring or employment practices, or in its admission to or operations of its program, services, or activities.

All inquiries for Title VI and/or the American with Disabilities Act, contact Alvan‐Bidal Sanchez at 901‐576‐7156 or [email protected].

Page 65 Introduction ETC Item: 6 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION

A. UPWP Adoption Resolution…………………..………………………………………………………………...…………………….….. 2 B. ACRONYMS…………………………………………………...………………………………………………………………….……………… 3 C. The Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization…………………………………….……………………. 5 II. ABOUT THE UPWP

A. The Uniied Planning Work Program……………………………………………...…………………………….…………………… 9 B. Planning Factors & Federal Initiatives…………………………………………………………………….………………………… 9 C. Partners in the Development of the UPWP………… ……………………………………………………………………………..13 D. Public Participation……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….. 14 E. UPWP Adoption and Amendment Process ..……………………………………………………………………………………... 14 F. Major Planning Tasks & Expenses for FY 2018‐19……………………………………………………………………………..15 III. MPO PLANNING TASKS

A. Program Administration……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…. 18 B. Data Collection, Maintenance, & Analysis………………………………………………………………………………………... 22 C. Short‐Range Planning…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 26 D. Long‐Range Planning……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 30 E. Air Quality & Congestion Management …………………………………………...... 34 F. Public Participation………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 39 G. Regional Public Transit Planning…………………………………………………………………………………………………..… 43 H. Planning Contingency……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….47 IV. UPWP FUNDING

A. Funding Sources for Planning Activities……...……………………………………………….. …………………………………. 49 B. FY 2018 Funding by Source…………...………………………………………………………………………………………………... 50 C. FY 2018 Funding by Agency………………….………..………………………………………….……………………………………. 51 D. FY 2019 Funding by Source…………...………………………………………………………………………………………………... 52 E. FY 2019 Funding by Agency………………….………..………………………………………….……………………………………. 53

V. Appendix

A. Other Studies…………….………………………...……...……………………………………………….. ………………………………….54

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 66Organization Introduction Page 2 ETC Item: 6

RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION BY THE TRANSPORTATION POLICY BOARD OF THE MEMPHIS URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADOPTION OF THE FY 2018‐2019 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM (UPWP) RESOLUTION # 2017‐04 WHEREAS, the U. S. Department of Transportaon planning regulaons require the preparaon and biennial endorsement of a biennial transpor- taon planning work program; and

WHEREAS, this document describes ongoing and proposed transportaon planning acvies for the MPO study area according to task, project, purpose, methodology, ancipated products, budget, and funding sources; and

WHEREAS, public parcipaon in the development of this document has been pursued in accordance with the Memphis MPO Public Parcipaon Plan; and

WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Transportaon agencies have jointly parcipated in the preparaon of this Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for transportaon planning acvies for FY 2018-2019; and

WHEREAS, the U. S. Department of Transportaon, Federal Transit Administraon, requires that all incomplete projects from the previous year UPWP be included in the current year Unified Planning Work Program; and

WHEREAS, the Engineering and Technical Commiee (ETC) has reviewed the FY 2018-2019 UPWP and recommended approval to the Transportaon Policy Board (TPB); and

WHEREAS, the Transportaon Policy Board has reviewed the FY 2018-2019 UPWP and has considered the public comments received, (if any) and concurs with the recommendaons of the ETC.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Transportaon Policy Board of the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organizaon does hereby approve and adopt the FY 2018-2019 Unified Planning Work Program.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Transportaon Policy Board of the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organizaon hereby requests the Tennessee and the Mississippi Departments of Transportaon funds to be used for performing transportaon planning tasks as described by subject in the FY 2018-2019 Unified Planning Work Program.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 67 Introduction ETC Item: 6 Page 3 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

AHTD Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department

APTS Advanced Public Transportation Systems

AQ Air Quality

AVL Automatic Vehicle Location

ATAC Active Transportation Advisory Committee

BPP Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CHSTP Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan

CMAQ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Program

CMP Congestion Management Process

COOP Continuity of Operations Plan

DOT Department of Transportation

DPD Memphis and Shelby County Division of Planning and Development

DRS Memphis and Shelby County Department of Regional Services

EIS Environmental Impact Study

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

ETC Engineering and Technical Committee eTIP Electronic Transportation Improvement Program

FHWA Federal Highway Administration

FAC Freight Advisory Committee

FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act

FTA Federal Transit Administration

FY Federal Fiscal Year (October 1‐September 30)

GIS Geographic Information Systems

HHTS Household Travel Survey

IAC Interagency Consultation (Air Quality)

IAR Interchange Access Request

ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems

LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan

MAP‐21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 68Organization Introduction Page 4 ETC Item: 6 MATA Memphis Area Transit Authority

MDEQ Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality

MDOT Mississippi Department of Transportation

MSCPC Memphis and Shelby County Port Commission

MSCAA Memphis and Shelby County Airport Authority

MSCHD Memphis and Shelby County Health Department

MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard

PL Metropolitan Planning Funds (FHWA)

PLAC Planning and Land Use Advisory Committee

PPP Public Participation Plan

RPO Rural Planning Organization

RTP Regional Transportation Plan

SIP State Implementation Plan (air quality)

SPR State Planning and Research funds

STIP Statewide Transportation Improvement Program

TA Transportation Alternatives

TAZ Trafic Analysis Zone

TEWTAP Tennessee Extreme Weather Transportation Adaptation Partnership

TDEC Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation

TDM Travel Demand Model

TDOT Tennessee Department of Transportation

TIM Trafic Incident Management

TIP Transportation Improvement Program

Title VI Title VI of the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended

TPB Memphis MPO Transportation Policy Board

TPR Transportation Planning Reports

TRIMS Tennessee Roadway Information Management System

UPACS User Proile & Access Control System

UPWP Uniied Planning Work Program

UROP Urban Operating Assistance Program

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 69 Introduction ETC Item: 6 Page 5

THE MEMPHIS URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

The Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (Memphis MPO) was created in 1977 and has the lead responsibility to ensure that the transportation planning process is being carried out in accordance with fed‐ eral and state regulations. Federal regulations require that an MPO be designated to carry out a comprehensive, continuing and cooperative transportation planning process for urbanized areas (as deined by the U.S. Bureau of Census) with a population of 50,000 or more.

As a result of the recently completed boundary expansion study, the Memphis MPO expanded its boundaries and is now comprised of eighteen cities or towns and four counties (Figure 1). The MPO boundary includes all of Shel‐ by County and a portion of western Fayette County in Tennessee. The boundary also includes all of DeSoto Coun‐ ty and a portion of western Marshall County in Mississippi (Figure 1). The boundary expansion was approved by the Transportation Policy Board (TPB) in November 2013 and later approved by the governors of both Mississip‐ pi and Tennessee in January 2014.

The Memphis and Shelby County Department of Regional Services (DRS) serves as staff for the Memphis MPO un‐ der the direction of the MPO’s Transportation Policy Board (TPB). The Memphis MPO also has ive advisory com‐ mittees namely, Engineering and Technical Committee (ETC), Active Transportation Advisory Committee (ATAC), Interagency Consultation Committee (IAC), Freight Advisory Committee (FAC), and the Planning and Land Use Advisory Committee (PLAC). The organizational chart that follows shows the role of the different federal, state, regional and local agencies in the Memphis MPO’s planning process (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Memphis MPO Plan‐ ning Area Boundary

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 70Organization Introduction Page 6 ETC Item: 6

Figure 2: MEMPHIS MPO ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

Memphis Urban Area MPO TPB

Memphis Urban Area MPO Committees

ETC

ATAC IAC FAC PLAC

Memphis Urban Area MPO Staff

Federal State Local

FHWA Tennessee Mississippi Agencies Jurisdictions (ex‐oficio)

TDOT MDOT MATA Tipton Co. Desoto Co. Shelby Co. (ex‐oficio) FTA (ex‐oficio) Hernando TDEC MDEQ MSCPC Arlington Tunica Co. (ex‐oficio) EPA Horn Lake Bartlett (ex‐oficio) MSCAA

Tate Co. Olive Branch Collierville (ex‐oficio) MSCHD Southaven Germantown Crittenden W Memphis Co. Walls MPO (ex‐oficio) Lakeland (ex‐oficio)

Fayette Co. Memphis

Braden Millington

Gallaway

Marshall Co. Ex‐oficio members attend all meetings Piperton and participate in discussions concerning Byhalia regional issues; however, they are not Oakland voting members of the board. Rossville

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 71 Page 7 ETC Item: 6

BLANK PAGE

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 72

ETC Item: 6

Section II: About the UPWP

Page 73 Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item: 6 Page 9 THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM

The Uniied Planning Work Program (UPWP) outlines transportation planning priorities and work tasks for the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Fiscal Years 2018‐19 (FY 2018‐19). The Fis‐ cal Years 2018‐19, based on the federal iscal year, begin October 1, 2017, and end September 30, 2019.

Preparation of the UPWP is required by the federal transportation legislation. The latest federal transportation legislation is the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST), which was signed into law on December 4, 2015. The UPWP is also a requirement of the Metropolitan Planning Code of Federal Regulations (23CFR 450.308) of the United States Department of Transportation. The UPWP must present a continuing, cooperative, and com‐ prehensive (the “3C”) approach to transportation planning activities. The UPWP is prepared with cooperation and guidance from federal, state, and local agencies, as well as state & public transportation operators. The vari‐ ous funding sources from which the Memphis MPO receives funding for transportation planning are listed in Sec‐ tion IV: UPWP Funding.

The UPWP is one of three key documents the Memphis MPO is required to develop and maintain for its planning area. The other key documents are the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).

PLANNING FACTORS & FEDERAL INITIATIVES

The 23 CFR 450.306 speciies ten (10) planning factors that must be considered in developing transportation plans, including the consideration and implementation of projects, strategies, and services. They are:

 Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and eficiency;

 Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non‐motorized users;

 Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non‐motorized users;

 Increase accessibility and mobility options available to people and for freight;

 Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life and pro‐ mote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and econom‐ ic development patterns;

 Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system— across and between modes— for people and for freight;

 Promote eficient system management and operation, including planning for operations; and

 Emphasize preservation of the existing transportation system.

 Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater im‐ pacts of surface transportation; and

 Enhance travel and tourism.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 74Organization Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item: 6 Page 10

In addition to the planning factors under MAP‐21 & FAST Act, the following federal initiatives were also consid‐ ered during the development of the work program. These initiatives, along with examples of related MPO tasks are described below:

 Extreme Weather: Address extreme weather mitigation and adaptation in the planning process.

 MPO Tasks: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ), Congestion Manage‐ ment Process (CMP), Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP)

 Livability: Integrate the livability principles of more transportation choices, equitable, affordable housing, enhanced economic competitiveness, support for existing communities, coordinated policies, leveraging investments, community connections, safe transportation for every pedestrian and valuing communities and neighborhoods into the transportation planning process.

 MPO Tasks: Bicycle & Pedestrian Biennial Report, Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), Transportation Alternative (TA), Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

 Planning for Operations: Activities that take place within the context of an agency, jurisdiction, and/or re‐ gional entity with the intent of establishing and carrying out plans, policies, and procedures that enable and improve the management and operation of transportation systems.

 MPO Tasks: Trafic Incident Management (TIM), Intelligent Transportation System (ITS), CMP, COOP

 Planning & Environmental Linkages: Consider environmental, community, and economic goals early in the planning process. Use the information, analysis, and products developed during planning to inform the envi‐ ronmental process.

 MPO Tasks: RTP, Environmental Justice Analysis, TIP, CMAQ

 Sustainability: Satisfy the functional requirements for development and economic growth while striving to enhance the natural environment and reduce consumption of natural resources.

 MPO Tasks: Bicycle & Pedestrian Biennial Report, RTP, TAP

 Freight: Engage public and private stakeholders representing all modes of freight to integrate freight plan‐ ning into the existing transportation planning process.

 MPO Tasks: Corridor Studies, RTP

 Environmental Justice: Identify and address adverse environmental and public health effects placed on mi‐ norities and low‐income groups as a result of programs, policies, and activities.

 MPO Tasks: CMAQ, CMP, Public Participation Plan (PPP), RTP, TIP, Travel Demand Model (TDM)

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 75 Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item: 6 Page 11

 Disaster Preparedness: Develop emergency preparedness procedures and response plans for natural disas‐ ters such as loods, earthquakes, tornadoes, etc.

 MPO Tasks: RTP, TIM, CMP, COOP

 Public Health: Address ways to mitigate negative health impacts of transportation such as reducing air pol‐ lution, prevent trafic injuries or deaths and encouraging multimodal transportation options such as walking or biking.

 MPO Tasks: TAP, CMAQ, BPP

 FHWA INVEST Tool: This tool is intended to enhance the planning process by providing a list of criteria that will be used to evaluate the sustainability of planning decisions. The tool has not been utilized, but will be considered in our future plans.

 MPO Tasks: RTP, Environmental Justice Analysis, TIP

 FAST Act/MAP ‐21Implementation: Develop and implement performance measures and targets that will help assess the performance of strategies aimed to improve the various components of the transportation system

 MPO Tasks: TDM, CMP, RTP, CMAQ, TIP

 Models of Regional Planning Cooperation: Promote cooperation and coordination across City, County, and State boundaries where appropriate to ensure a regional approach to transportation planning.

 MPO Tasks: Travel Demand Model, CMP, TIP, RTP, PPP

 Access to Essential Services: Identify transportation connectivity gaps, community connections and coordi‐ nated public transportation human services activities in access to essential services.

 MPO Tasks: Land Use Model, Environmental Justice Analysis, TIP, RTP

The table “Planning Factors & Federal Initiatives as Addressed by Tasks” on the following page shows how the Planning Tasks relate to each of the planning factors and initiatives described above.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 76Organization Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item: 6 Page 12

E G B A C D Air Quality & F Regional Data Collection, Program Short‐Range Long‐Range Congestion Public Public Tasks Maintenance & Administration Planning Planning Management Participation Transit Analysis Planning Planning MAP‐21 Planning Factors as Addressed by Tasks Economic      

Safety       

Security      

Mobility Options       

Conserve Environment Energy       

Multi‐Modal Integration       

Operations & Management      

Preserve Existing System       FAST Act Planning Factors as Addressed by Tasks System Reliability & Resiliency      

Enhance Travel & Tourism       MAP‐21/ FAST Act Federal Initiatives as Addressed by Tasks Extreme Weather       

Livability       

Planning for Operations       

FHWA INVEST Tool       

Disaster Preparedness       

Public Health       

Environmental Justice        Freight      Planning and Environmental Linkages       

Sustainability       

FAST Act/ MAP‐21 Implementa‐ tion      

Models of Regional Planning Cooperation       Access to Essential Services      

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 77 Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item: 6 Page 13

PARTNERS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UPWP

A number of federal, state, regional, and local agencies and jurisdictions were involved in the development of the FY 2018‐19 UPWP. They include:

 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

 Federal Transit Administration (FTA)

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

 Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT)

 Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT)

 Shelby County Government

 Fayette County Government

 Desoto County Government

 Marshall County Government

 DeSoto County Planning Commission

 Local incorporated jurisdictions (Arlington, Bartlett, Braden, Byhalia, Collierville, Gallaway, Germantown, Hernando, Horn Lake, Lakeland, Memphis, Millington, Oakland, Olive Branch, Piperton, Rossville, Southaven, and Walls)

 Memphis and Shelby County Division of Planning and Development

 Memphis and Shelby County Department of Regional Services

 Shelby County Health Department

 Memphis and Shelby County Airport Authority

 Memphis and Shelby County Port Commission

 Memphis Area Transit Authority (MATA)

 West Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization

Under the MPO, several boards and committees were involved in the development of the UPWP. They include:

 Transportation Policy Board (TPB)

 Engineering and Technical Committee (ETC)

 Active Transportation Advisory Committee (ATAC)

 Interagency Consultation Committee (IAC)

 Freight Advisory Committee (FAC)

 Planning and Land Use Advisory Committee (PLAC)

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 78Organization Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item: 6 Page 14 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

The public is invited and encouraged to participate in all phases of the MPO’s planning process. Guidelines for public participation actions are listed in the MPO’s Public Participation Plan (PPP), which is available on the MPO website at www.memphismpo.org or at the MPO ofices. Efforts to encourage public involvement include:

 Publication of notices of public meetings in the local, metropolitan daily newspaper, The Commercial Ap‐ peal, as well as several geographically and ethnically service‐oriented newspapers such as The DeSoto Times, Fayette County Review, The Tri‐State Defender, and La Prensa Latina;

 Notiication is given at least ten (10) calendar days prior to public meetings (including all board and com‐ mittee meetings). For items requiring public hearings before the Transportation Policy Board, a ten (10), thirty (30) or forty‐ive (45) day public notice/public comment period is advertised in a similar manner. Notiication of public meetings is also provided at the MPO website at www.memphismpo.org;

 Publication of key documents and/or executive summaries in the English and Spanish languages;

 Distribution of key documents to designated branches of the Memphis and Shelby County Public Library and Information System and the library systems in DeSoto County, Marshall County and Fayette County;

 Inclusion of key documents on the MPO website at www.memphismpo.org;

 A quarterly newsletter is produced and distributed with information about public participation transpor‐ tation planning updates; recent newsletters can be found on the MPO website at www.memphismpo.org. The public is encouraged to join our contact list to receive the newsletter by email at http:// www.memphismpo.org/get‐involved/contact

 Comments by the public are accepted in person at public and board/committee meetings; by mail at the Department of Regional Services, 125 North Main Street, Room # 450, Memphis, Tennessee, 38103; by telephone at 901‐576‐7190; by fax at 901‐576‐7272; and by email at [email protected]. THE UPWP ADOPTION & AMENDMENT/ADJUSTMENT PROCESS

Prior to its adoption, the FY 2018‐19 UPWP was presented to the MPO’s Engineering and Technical Committee (ETC) and Transportation Policy Board (TPB) for consideration and approval. The UPWP was also distributed to interested parties and the MPO’s library distribution system for a ten (10) calendar day comment period prior to its consideration before these bodies, and comments received were presented to the ETC and TPB prior to consid‐ eration for adoption of the FY 2018‐19 UPWP.

Amendments to the UPWP (those that involve adding or deleting funds more than 20%, change in the scope of the work tasks or add or delete a work task) will follow the ten (10) calendar day public review period as described for the UPWP adoption. Adjustments, changes that do not involve a change the scope of the funded work tasks and/or adjustment funding amounts by no more than 20% of funds allocated in a work task , or minor text adjust‐ ments (e.g. grammatical error or spelling mistakes), do not require a public input process.

The FY 2018‐19 UPWP and any subsequent amendments are subject to review and approval by the MPO’s state and federal partners, MDOT, TDOT, FHWA’s Mississippi and Tennessee Divisions , and FTA. Adjustments are sub‐ ject to review and approval by MDOT and TDOT.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 79 NEW PAGE Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item: 6 AMENDED FEB 21, 2019 Page 15

MAJOR PLANNING TASKS & EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018‐19

The following tasks have been identiied by the Memphis Urban Area MPO to be completed or addressed during Fiscal Years 2018‐19. A brief description of each task is given, including whether the task will be completed by MPO staff or by consultant (s), the time frame for each activity, and the UPWP task associated:

1. The MPO will contract with consultants to provide air quality modeling, conformity analysis, and travel demand modeling for the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Transportation Improvement Pro‐ gram (TIP). $99,000[Task E: Air Quality & Congestion Management Planning]

2. The MPO will contract with consultants to develop the 2050 Regional Transportation Plan, which is scheduled for adoption in August 2019. $700,000. [Task D: Long‐Range Planning]

3. The MPO staff will prepare the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Fiscal Years 2020‐23. The TIP lists roadway, congestion management, operational, enhancement, bicycle, pedestrian, and mass transit projects for the Memphis MPO area. The 2020‐2023 TIP will be completed in FY 2019 and anticipates Federal approval from FHWA and FTA in December 2019. [Task C: Short‐Range Planning]

4. The MPO staff will update the Uniied Planning Work Program (UPWP) for Fiscal Year 2019, which pro‐ grams funding for the major planning tasks of the MPO. The FY 2019 UPWP update will be completed in FY 2018. [Task A: Program Administration]

5. The MPO staff will prepare the Uniied Planning Work Program (UPWP) for Fiscal Years 2020‐21, which programs funding for the major planning tasks of the MPO. The FY 2020‐21 UPWP will be completed in FY 2019. [Task A: Program Administration]

6. The MPO will conduct studies on the livability corridors established during the development of the Liv‐ ability 2040 RTP. These studies will assess the multimodal performance of the corridors. $150,000 [Task C: Short Range Planning]

7. The MPO will contract with consultants to update the Memphis MPO Regional Intelligent Transporta‐ tion Systems (ITS) Architecture, which is updated approximately every four years, prior to the adoption of the RTP. The ITS Architecture update will be completed in FY 2018. $100,000 [Task E: Air Quality & Congestion Management Planning]

8. The MPO and a consultant will update the Travel Demand Model, based on updated demographic and land use information for Trafic Analysis Zone (TAZs) in the MPO planning area. $150,000. This project is expected to be completed in FY 2019. [Task: Data Collection]

9. The MPO staff will complete a Biennial report from the Memphis MPO’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The report will include jurisdiction updated report, current pedestrian and bicycle data and recommen‐ dations, tracking of benchmarks listed in plan. The report will be completed in FY 2018, with an esti‐ mated cost of $100,000. [Task C: Short Range Planning]

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 80Organization Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item: 6 Page 15

MAJOR PLANNING TASKS & EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018‐19

The following tasks have been identiied by the Memphis Urban Area MPO to be completed or addressed during Fiscal Years 2018‐19. A brief description of each task is given, including whether the task will be completed by MPO staff or by consultant (s), the time frame for each activity, and the UPWP task associated:

1. The MPO will contract with consultants to provide air quality modeling, conformity analysis, and travel demand modeling for the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Transportation Improvement Pro‐ gram (TIP). $99,000[Task E: Air Quality & Congestion Management Planning]

2. The MPO will contract with consultants to develop the 2050 Regional Transportation Plan, which is scheduled for adoption in August 2019. $700,000. [Task D: Long‐Range Planning]

3. The MPO staff will prepare the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Fiscal Years 2020‐23. The TIP lists roadway, congestion management, operational, enhancement, bicycle, pedestrian, and mass transit projects for the Memphis MPO area. The 2020‐2023 TIP will be completed in FY 2019 and anticipates Federal approval from FHWA and FTA in December 2019. [Task C: Short‐Range Planning]

4. The MPO staff will update the Uniied Planning Work Program (UPWP) for Fiscal Year 2019, which pro‐ grams funding for the major planning tasks of the MPO. The FY 2019 UPWP update will be completed in FY 2018. [Task A: Program Administration]

5. The MPO staff will prepare the Uniied Planning Work Program (UPWP) for Fiscal Years 2020‐21, which programs funding for the major planning tasks of the MPO. The FY 2020‐21 UPWP will be completed in FY 2019. [Task A: Program Administration]

6. The MPO will conduct studies on the livability corridors established during the development of the Liv‐ ability 2040 RTP. These studies will assess the multimodal performance of the corridors. $300,000 [Task C: Short Range Planning]

7. The MPO will contract with consultants to update the Memphis MPO Regional Intelligent Transporta‐ tion Systems (ITS) Architecture, which is updated approximately every four years, prior to the adoption of the RTP. The ITS Architecture update will be completed in FY 2018. $100,000 [Task E: Air Quality & Congestion Management Planning]

8. The MPO and a consultant will update the Travel Demand Model, based on updated demographic and land use information for Trafic Analysis Zone (TAZs) in the MPO planning area. $150,000. This project is expected to be completed in FY 2019. [Task: Data Collection]

9. The MPO staff will complete a Biennial report from the Memphis MPO’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The report will include jurisdiction updated report, current pedestrian and bicycle data and recommen‐ dations, tracking of benchmarks listed in plan. The report will be completed in FY 2018, with an esti‐ mated cost of $100,000. [Task C: Short Range Planning]

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 81Organization NEW PAGE Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item:AMENDED 6 FEB 21, 2019 Page 16

10. The MPO will contract with consultants to develop a Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan covering the counties of Shelby and Fayette in Tennessee, and DeSoto and Marshall Counties in Mississippi. The plan will encompass a uniied vision and goals; robust outreach; data collection/purchase; network analysis, connectivity, and routing database establishment. The Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan , is expected to be completed by September 2020. $150,000. [Task D: Long‐Range Planning]

11. The MPO staff will prepare an updated Congestion Management Process, which contains established techniques for addressing air quality and congestion needs for the MPO planning region including data collection/purchase. The task is expected to be completed by September 2020. [Task E: Air Quality & Congestion Management]

12. The MPO staff will update the Public Participation Plan. The update will include reviewing the roles of the various MPO committees in the MPO activities, reviewing the current public involvement strategies to reach various stakeholders and underrepresented groups, identifying additional outreach tools to and updated data collection/purchase to improve the overall public outreach process. The task is expected to be completed by July 2020. [Task F: Public Participation]

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 82

ETC Item: 6

Section III: MPO Planning Tasks

Page 83 Section II: About the UPWP ETC Item: 6 Page 18

A. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

PURPOSE

To conduct the metropolitan planning processes in conformance with applicable federal (23 CFR 450) and state requirements and to ensure the maintenance of a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the Memphis MPO planning area.

PREVIOUS PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION TASKS

1. The MPO prepared the FY 2018 ‐19 UPWP .

2. The MPO completed the Title VI annual assessment and provided Title VI education and awareness with‐ in the MPO planning area.

3. The MPO prepared for and attended meetings, as well as recorded meeting minutes, prepared meeting agendas, and prepared annual contracts, quarterly invoices and progress reports.

4. The MPO participated on the Regional Chamber Transportation Committee, West Tennessee Rural Plan‐ ning Organization (RPO) meetings, West Memphis MPO meetings, MATA Board meetings, Statewide IAC meetings, Desoto County TIP Project Selection Meetings, State FAC Meetings (TDOT & MDOT), and PLAC, FAC, IAC & ATAC meetings.

5. The MPO utilized small/disadvantaged business participation in MPO professional services.

6. The MPO worked with the planning divisions of TDOT and MDOT to establish the administrative and tech‐ nical procedures required, prepared contractual agreements as required, attended all MPO meetings, dis‐ tributed special and annual reports and study documents, reviewed and analyzed individual transporta‐ tion planning projects and studies, and undertook general administrative activities.

7. TDOT Multimodal Transportation Resources Division administered correspondence and telephone con‐ tacts regarding river transportation, urban public transit, rail service, ridesharing and transportation sys‐ tems management. Representatives of this ofice participated in MPO meetings; distributed federal guide‐ lines and requirements; conducted seminars and work sessions; provided advice and assistance concern‐ ing feasibility of river transportation development; reviewed study documentation and reports; adminis‐ tered funds for port development. This ofice coordinated FTA’s Section 5303, 5307, 5309, and 5310 pro‐ grams in MPO planning area.

8. The MPO attended transportation conferences, workshops, and seminars offering professional develop‐ ment and instruction in best practices and current procedures for transportation planning. Some of these conferences included the FHWA Safety Performance Measure Training, Association for Metropolitan Plan‐ ning Organizations (AMPO) conference, Tennessee Model Users Group (TNMUG) meetings, Active Trans‐ portation and Demand Management Workshop hosted by FHWA and TDOT, FHWA webinars, and TDOT and MDOT MPO conferences.

9. MATA attended and participated in MPO meetings and assisted with the development and ongoing maintenance of local planning activities such as the UPWP, TIP, CHSTP, and RTP.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 84 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 19

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION TASKS FOR FY 2018 ‐19

1. The MPO will update the FY 2019 portion of the FY 2018 ‐19 UPWP.

2. The MPO will prepare the FY 2020 –21 UPWP.

3. The MPO will prepare annual updates to the Title VI Report and provide Title VI education and awareness within the MPO planning area.

4. The MPO will prepare for and attend the MPO’s ETC meetings (quarterly), TPB meetings (quarterly), IAC meetings (quarterly), ATAC (quarterly), FAC (as needed) and PLAC (as needed) as well as record meeting minutes, prepare meeting agendas.

5. MPO will prepare annual contracts, quarterly invoices and progress reports.

6. The MPO will participate on the Regional Chamber Transportation Committee, West Tennessee Rural Planning Organization (RPO) meetings, West Memphis MPO meetings, MATA Board meetings, Statewide IAC meetings, TN Bicycle Committee Conference Call and State FAC Meetings (TDOT & MDOT).

7. The MPO will utilize when possible small/disadvantaged business participation in MPO professional ser‐ vices.

8. The planning divisions of TDOT and MDOT will work jointly with the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to establish the required administrative and technical procedures and prepare contractual agree‐ ments. They will also attend technical and policy board meetings, distribute information on Federal transportation planning guidelines and requirements, conduct seminars and work sessions, review the MPO’s transportation planning studies and reports, and undertake general administrative activities.

9. The Multimodal Transportation Resources Division, Tennessee Department of Transportation, will admin‐ ister State and Federal programs regarding river transportation, urban public transportation, rail service, ride‐sharing, and transportation systems management. Representatives of this ofice will participate in MPO meetings, distribute Federal transit guidelines and requirements, conduct seminars and work ses‐ sions, and review MPO studies and reports. This ofice will coordinate FTA’s Section 5303, 5307, 5309, 5310, 5339 and Urban Operating Assistance Program (UROP) programs in MPO planning area.

10. MATA will participate and attend meetings of the MPO Engineering and Technical Committee (ETC), Transportation Policy Board (TPB) and various other committees.

11. The MPO staff will attend Annual Association for Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO) confer‐ ence, Tennessee Model Users Group (TNMUG) meetings, FHWA sponsored conferences, seminars & webi‐ nars, and Annual TDOT and MDOT MPO conferences. Attending other future transportation conferences, workshops, and seminars will be coordinated with both TDOT and MDOT.

12. MATA will attend and participate in MPO meetings and assist with the development and ongoing mainte‐ nance of local planning activities such as the UPWP, TIP, and RTP.

13. The MPO will develop a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) to ensure the continuity of essential ofice functions in the occurrence of a major event/emergency/disaster.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 85Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 20

TASK A. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Quarterly Progress Reports Quarterly Ongoing

Committee & Board Meetings October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Attend Training and Workshops October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Title VI Education Awareness October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Title VI Report Update January 2018 ‐ February 2018 February 2018

Administration and Coordination October 2016 ‐ September 2017 Ongoing

FY19 Update to the FY 2018‐19 UPWP January 2018 ‐ August 2018 August 2018

FY 2019 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Quarterly Progress Reports Quarterly Ongoing

Committee & Board Meetings October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Attend Training and Workshops October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Title VI Education Awareness October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Title VI Report Update January 2019‐ February 2019 February 2019

Administration and Coordination October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

FY 2020‐21 UPWP January 2019– August 2019 August 2019

Continuity of Operations Plan January 2019 ‐ September 2019 September 2019

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 86 NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item:AMENDED 6 FEB 21, 2019 Page 21

FUNDING FOR PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ACTIVITIES (TASK A.)

2018 Funding PL ‐ TN SPR Sec 112 PL‐TN SPR TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $512,168 $199,345 $43,000 $754,513 State $5,375 $5,375 Local* $128,042 $49,836 $5,375 $183,253 Sub Total $640,210 $249,181 $53,750 $943,141 TDOT Federal $20,398 $20,398 State $5,099 $5,099 Sub Total $25,497 $25,497 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 MATA Federal $8,000 $8,000 State $1,000 $1,000 Local* $1,000 $1,000 Sub Total $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL $640,210 $25,497 $249,181 $63,750 $25,000 $1,003,638 2019 Funding PL ‐ TN SPR Sec 112 PL‐TN SPR TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $512,168 $195,345 $43,000 $750,513 State $5,375 $5,375 Local* $128,042 $48,836 $5,375 $182,253 Sub Total $640,210 $244,181 $53,750 $938,141 TDOT Federal $20,398 $20,398 State $5,099 $5,099 Sub Total $25,497 $25,497 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 MATA Federal $8,000 $8,000 State $1,000 $1,000 Local* $1,000 $1,000 Sub Total $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL $640,210 $25,497 $244,181 $63,750 $25,000 $998,638 * City of Memphis‐Shelby County and Desoto County provides the local match for the Tennessee and Mississippi portions of PL allocation (Section 112). ** 10% local match for PL‐TN(80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. The City of Memphis provides the 10% local match for MATA planning tasks under the PL (TN), previously TN 5303 funding program.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 87Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 20

FUNDING FOR PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ACTIVITIES (TASK A.)

2018 Funding PL ‐ TN SPR Sec 112 PL‐TN SPR TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $512,168 $199,345 $43,000 $754,513 State $5,375 $5,375 Local* $128,042 $49,836 $5,375 $183,253 Sub Total $640,210 $249,181 $53,750 $943,141 TDOT Federal $20,398 $20,398 State $5,099 $5,099 Sub Total $25,497 $25,497 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 MATA Federal $8,000 $8,000 State $1,000 $1,000 Local* $1,000 $1,000 Sub Total $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL $640,210 $25,497 $249,181 $63,750 $25,000 $1,003,638 2019 Funding PL ‐ TN SPR Sec 112 PL‐TN SPR TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $512,168 $199,345 $43,000 $754,513 State $5,375 $5,375 Local* $128,042 $49,836 $5,375 $183,253 Sub Total $640,210 $249,181 $53,750 $943,141 TDOT Federal $20,398 $20,398 State $5,099 $5,099 Sub Total $25,497 $25,497 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 MATA Federal $8,000 $8,000 State $1,000 $1,000 Local* $1,000 $1,000 Sub Total $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL $640,210 $25,497 $249,181 $63,750 $25,000 $1,003,638

* City of Memphis‐Shelby County and Desoto County provides the local match for the Tennessee and Mississippi portions of PL allocation (Section 112). ** 10% local match for PL‐TN(80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. The City of Memphis provides the 10% local match for MATA planning tasks under the PL (TN), previously TN 5303 funding program. FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 88 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 22

B. DATA COLLECTION, MAINTENANCE & ANALYSIS

PURPOSE

To collect and maintain an up‐to‐date inventory of planning data which includes, but is not limited to land use, travel patterns, travel mode, transit ridership, socio‐economic information and demographics for use in the MPO’s Geographic Information System (GIS) and travel demand forecasting databases. The MPO’s data collection and analysis efforts are directly linked to the development of the RTP, updated every four years, as well as the various plans, programs, and studies conducted by the MPO and its federal, state, and local partners.

PREVIOUS DATA COLLECTION, MAINTENANCE & ANALYSIS TASKS

1. The MPO collected, updated and maintained GIS database for the MPO region.

2. The MPO monitored the Community Viz Model by updating its database on a regular basis. The database included population projections, land use patterns, employment centers etc.

3. TDOT and MDOT collected trafic count data, conducted special trafic counts needed for planning and de‐ sign projects, maintained accident ile, furnished high hazard listings and other safety data, and conducted travel time studies.

4. MATA provided information to the National Transit Database Report, which is done on an annual basis.

5. MATA maintained a Geographic Information System (GIS) database of bus route, transit stop and shelter locations.

6. The MPO continued to conduct safety‐related and other research using sources such as the Tennessee Roadway Information Management System (TRIMS) database for planning purposes and data requests from member jurisdictions and partner agencies.

7. The MPO received a $20,000 award under the FHWA Bicycle‐Pedestrian Count Technology Pilot Program. MPO purchased portable automatic counters for collecting bicycle & pedestrian counts at various loca‐ tions within the MPO region and prepared a short summary report.

DATA COLLECTION TASKS FOR FY 2018 ‐19

1. The MPO will prepare performance measure targets based on the guidance provided by FHWA, FTA TDOT & MDOT to keep track of the performance of the regional transportation system.

2. The MPO will continue to collect, update and maintain a GIS database for the MPO region. The MPO will continue to evaluate its GIS database for more effective regional analysis and communication with the public and stakeholders.

3. TDOT and MDOT will continue to collect trafic count data, conduct special trafic counts as needed for planning and design projects, maintain accident iles, and furnish high hazard listings and other safety da‐ ta as required. Travel time studies will be conducted if needed for special studies.

4. MPO will continue to monitor the Community Viz Model by updating its database at a regular basis.

5. MATA will continue to prepare annual transit ridership statistics for publication in the National Transit

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 89 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 23

Database. This will involve collecting, editing, assembling and reviewing transit ridership data by day, type, trip time, and transit stops.

6. MATA will continue to update and maintain local transit infrastructure data such as route, schedule and stop information for use in GIS databases and integration into Advanced Public Transportation Sys‐ tems (APTS) for use with automatic vehicle location technology (AVL), stop annunciators, advanced fare collection devices, and next transit vehicle message boards. Data will be compiled in a format that can be utilized in other applications such as printed route and schedule maps and timetables as well as other marketing and public information materials.

7. The MPO will continue to conduct safety‐related and other research using sources such as the TRIMS database for planning purposes and data requests from member jurisdictions and partner agencies.

8. The MPO will work with consultants to update the Memphis MPO Travel Demand Model. Work task will include incorporating land use model results into the Travel Demand Model and updated data which will include new TAZ boundaries, survey data, and update demographics. The project is scheduled to be completed on or before January 2019.

9. The MPO will continue to collect bicycle and pedestrian data under the FHWA Bicycle‐Pedestrian Count Technology Pilot Program. The MPO plans to collect other counts in jurisdictions and providing that count information in the Biennial Bicycle and Pedestrian Report in 2018.

10. MPO will coordinate with the Census Bureau to establish Trafic Analysis Zones (TAZs) for the Memphis MPO area using census geography, in preparation for the 2020 Census.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 90Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 24

TASK B. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE GIS Development /Maintenance October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Annual Trafic Counts October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Compile Trafic Counts October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Accident Data Coding October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

National Transit Database Report October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

TRIMS Research October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Community Viz Model Maintenance October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Data Collection October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Performance Measures October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Travel Demand Model Update October 2017‐ September 2018 January 2019

Bicycle & Pedestrian Data Collection October 2017‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Travel Times Study October 2017‐ September 2018 As Required

FY 2019 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE GIS Development /Maintenance October 2018‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Annual Trafic Counts October 2018‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Compile Trafic Counts October 2018‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Accident Data Coding October 2018‐ September 2019 Ongoing

National Transit Database Report October 2018‐ September 2019 Ongoing

TRIMS Research October 2018‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Community Viz Model Maintenance October 2018‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Performance Measures October 2018‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Travel Demand Model Update October 2018‐ September 2019 January 2019

Travel Time Studies October 2018‐ September 2019 As Required

Census 2020 TAZ Update October 2018‐ September 2019 September 2019

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 91 NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6AMENDED FEB 21, 2019 Page 25

FUNDING FOR DATA COLLECTION AND MAINTENANCE (TASK B.) 2018 Funding PL‐TN SPR Sec 112 SPR PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $463,600 $75,616 $40,000 $25,000 $604,216 State $5,000 $6,250 $11,250 Local* $115,900 $18,904 $5,000 $139,804 Sub Total $579,500 $94,520 $50,000 $31,250 $755,270 TDOT Federal $17,012 $17,012 State $4,253 $4,253 Sub Total $21,265 $21,265 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 MATA Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $2,500 $2,500 Local* $2,500 $2,500 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $579,500 $21,265 $94,520 $25,000 $75,000 $31,250 $826,535 2019 Funding PL‐TN SPR Sec 112 SPR PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $463,600 $59,616 $40,000 $25,000 $588,216 State $5,000 $6,250 $11,250 Local* $115,900 $14,904 $5,000 $135,804 Sub Total $579,500 $74,520 $50,000 $31,250 $735,270 TDOT Federal $17,012 $17,012 State $4,253 $4,253 Sub Total $21,265 $21,265 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 MATA Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $2,500 $2,500 Local* $2,500 $2,500 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $579,500 $21,265 $74,520 $25,000 $75,000 $31,250 $806,535

*City of Memphis‐Shelby County provides the 20% local match for the TN portion of PL allocation and Desoto County provides the local match for the Mississippi portions of PL allocation (Section 112).

** 10% local match for PL‐TN (80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. The City of Memphis provides the 10% local match for MATA planning tasks under the PL (TN), previously TN 5303 funding program.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 92Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 24

FUNDING FOR DATA COLLECTION AND MAINTENANCE (TASK B.) 2018 Funding PL‐TN SPR Sec 112 SPR PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $463,600 $75,616 $40,000 $25,000 $604,216 State $5,000 $6,250 $11,250 Local* $115,900 $18,904 $5,000 $139,804 Sub Total $579,500 $94,520 $50,000 $31,250 $755,270 TDOT Federal $17,012 $17,012 State $4,253 $4,253 Sub Total $21,265 $21,265 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 MATA Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $2,500 $2,500 Local* $2,500 $2,500 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $579,500 $21,265 $94,520 $25,000 $75,000 $31,250 $826,535 2019 Funding PL‐TN SPR Sec 112 SPR PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (MS) (80/10/10 (MS) MPO Federal $463,600 $75,616 $40,000 $25,000 $604,216 State $5,000 $6,250 $11,250 Local* $115,900 $18,904 $5,000 $139,804 Sub Total $579,500 $94,520 $50,000 $31,250 $755,270 TDOT Federal $17,012 $17,012 State $4,253 $4,253 Sub Total $21,265 $21,265 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 MATA Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $2,500 $2,500 Local* $2,500 $2,500 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $579,500 $21,265 $94,520 $25,000 $75,000 $31,250 $826,535

*City of Memphis‐Shelby County provides the 20% local match for the TN portion of PL allocation and Desoto County provides the local match for the Mississippi portions of PL allocation (Section 112).

** 10% local match for PL‐TN (80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. The City of Memphis provides the 10% local match for MATA planning tasks under the PL (TN), previously TN 5303 funding program. FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 93 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 26

C. SHORT RANGE PLANNING

PURPOSE

To prepare and maintain an accurate and iscally constrained Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). To evaluate designated corridors and sub areas of the MPO planning area for changes in development trends and so‐ cio‐economic conditions and provide detailed implementation strategies to supplement the transportation poli‐ cies of the RTP and programming priorities of the TIP for designated corridors and sub areas.

PREVIOUS SHORT RANGE PLANNING TASKS

1. The MPO prepared the FY 2017 ‐ 2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which was adopted by the TPB.

2. The MPO prepared amendments and adjustments to the FY 2017‐2020 TIP.

3. The MPO prepared amendments to the Livability 2040 RTP.

4. The MPO worked with TDOT, MDOT, local jurisdictions and contracting engineering irms by providing information and data for transportation projects.

5. The MPO monitored, assessed and provided comments related to compliance with the RTP and the planned eficiency of major roadways through the review of local development proposals.

6. The MPO prepared the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects.

7. MDOT conducted trafic studies throughout the planning area.

8. The MPO lead the selection process for eligible projects within the Memphis Urbanized Area under the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds.

9. The MPO explored the development of a web interface to improve the eficiency of the process to man‐ age Transportation Improvements Projects.

SHORT RANGE PLANNING TASKS FOR FY 2018‐19

1. The MPO will prepare amendments and adjustments to the FY 2017‐2020 TIP as necessary.

2. The MPO will prepare the Fiscal Years 2020 ‐23 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which is scheduled for adoption by the TPB in August 2019.

3. The MPO will prepare amendments to the Livability 2040 RTP as needed.

4. The MPO will monitor, assess and provide comments related to compliance with the RTP and the planned eficiency of major roadways through the review of local development proposals. Data will also be used to track development trends used in developing socio‐economic data for the RTP.

5. The MPO will produce and disseminate the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects.

6. MDOT will conduct trafic studies as needed throughout the planning area.

7. The MPO staff will complete a Biennial report from the Memphis MPO’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The report will include jurisdiction updated report, current pedestrian and bicycle data and recommenda‐ tions, tracking of benchmarks listed in plan. The report will be completed in FY 2018.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 94 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 27 SHORT RANGE PLANNING TASKS FOR FY 2018 ‐ 19 (continued)

8. The MPO will conduct studies on the livability corridors established during the development of the RTP. Livability corridors are corridors that have been identiied the greatest potential for targeted multimodal enhancements that advance regional livability goals. Investments on livability corridors will focus on multimodal mobility enhancements as a priority.

9. The MPO will lead the selection process for eligible projects within the Memphis Urbanized Area under future Transportation Alternatives (TA) funds.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 95Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 28

TASK C. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE

Livability 2040 RTP Amendments October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

FY 2017‐20 TIP Amendments/ October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required Adjustments

Development Reviews October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Annual Listing of Obligated Projects October 2017 ‐ November 2017 November 2017

Livability Corridor Studies October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

FY 2020‐23 TIP Development October 2017 ‐ September 2018 August 2019

Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Report October 2017 ‐ September 2018 September 2018

FY 2019 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE

Livability 2040 RTP Amendments October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

FY 2020‐23 TIP Amendments/ October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required Adjustments

Development Reviews October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Annual Listing of Obligated Projects October 2018 ‐ November 2018 November 2018

Livability Corridor Studies October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

FY 2020‐23 TIP Development October 2018 ‐ August 2019 August 2019

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 96 NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 AMENDED FEB 21, 2019 Page 29

FUNDING FOR SHORT RANGE PLANNING (TASK C.)

2018 Funding PL‐TN Sec 112 PL‐TN SPR TOTAL (80/20) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $354,800 $27,616 $40,000 $422,416 State $5,000 $5,000 Local* $88,700 $6,904 $5,000 $100,604 Sub Total $443,500 $34,520 $50,000 $528,020 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $443,500 $34,520 $50,000 $25,000 $553,020

2019 Funding PL‐TN Sec 112 PL‐TN SPR TOTAL (80/20) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $194,800 $7,616 $40,000 $242,416 State $5,000 $5,000 Local* $48,700 $1,904 $5,000 $55,604 Sub Total $243,500 $9,520 $50,000 $303,020 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $243,500 $9,520 $50,000 $25,000 $328,020

*City of Memphis ‐ Shelby County and Desoto County provides the local match for the Tennessee and Mississippi portions PL allocation (Section 112 ).

** 10% local match for PL‐TN (80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 97Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 28

FUNDING FOR SHORT RANGE PLANNING (TASK C.)

2018 Funding PL‐TN Sec 112 PL‐TN SPR TOTAL (80/20) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $354,800 $27,616 $40,000 $422,416 State $5,000 $5,000 Local* $88,700 $6,904 $5,000 $100,604 Sub Total $443,500 $34,520 $50,000 $528,020 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $443,500 $34,520 $50,000 $25,000 $553,020

2019 Funding PL‐TN Sec 112 PL‐TN SPR TOTAL (80/20) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $354,800 $27,616 $40,000 $422,416 State $5,000 $5,000 Local* $88,700 $6,904 $5,000 $100,604 Sub Total $443,500 $34,520 $50,000 $528,020 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $443,500 $34,520 $50,000 $25,000 $553,020

*City of Memphis ‐ Shelby County and Desoto County provides the local match for the Tennessee and Mississippi portions PL allocation (Section 112 ).

** 10% local match for PL‐TN (80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 98 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 30

D. LONG RANGE PLANNING

PURPOSE

To maintain and update intermodal transportation plans which will serve the long range transportation needs of the metropolitan planning area and which are in compliance with federal and state requirements. The MPO also ensures iscal constraint and conformity for the metropolitan transportation plan.

PREVIOUS LONG RANGE PLANNING TASKS

1. The MPO monitored major transportation facilities including roadways, transit, and multi‐modal and in‐ termodal facilities to evaluate roadway improvements and congestion management strategies planned near these facilities.

2. TDOT’s and MDOT’s Long Range Planning Divisions worked with the MPO to help with model develop‐ ment, freight planning and ITS development and implementation.

3. The MPO worked with state, county and municipal engineers and planners to establish or modify speciic major road corridor alignments.

4. The MPO worked with its partners to coordinate Trafic Incident Management efforts for the Memphis region.

5. The MPO worked with consultants to develop the Livability 2040 RTP.

6. The MPO worked with the consultants and regional partners to develop the Regional Freight Plan.

LONG RANGE PLANNING TASKS FOR FY 2018‐19

1. The MPO will monitor major transportation facilities including roadways, transit, and multi‐modal and intermodal facilities. The purpose is to evaluate roadway improvements and congestion management strategies planned near these facilities.

2. The MPO will continue to collect and analyze data pertaining to performance measures developed for the regional transportation system, based on the guidelines of the Livability 2040 RTP.

3. TDOT’s and MDOT’s Long Range Planning Divisions will continue assistance with modeling needs, includ‐ ing technical assistance for MPO staff, training, review of models and oversight of consultants contracted to work with models.

4. TDOT’s and MDOT’s Long Range Planning Divisions will assess current and projected demand for statewide freight and goods movement and relative capacity of facilities in the metropolitan planning ar‐ ea that carry these trips.

5. TDOT’s and MDOT’s Long Range Planning Divisions will evaluate needs and opportunities for improved operations of the state transportation system within the metropolitan planning area and plan for opera‐ tional and capital solutions to these needs.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 99 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 31

LONG RANGE PLANNING TASKS FOR FY 2018‐19

6. The MPO will work with its partners to continue planning for operations and Trafic Incident Manage‐ ment (TIM) in the Memphis region. Speciic activities under this task include an annual self‐assessment for incident management; regularly scheduled TIM meetings; and workshops, webinars, and other train‐ ing for regional partners on tools and strategies for incident management and planning for operations.

7. MPO will work with state, county and municipal engineers and planners to establish or modify speciic major road corridor alignments. Such work would include attendance at meetings, presentation of com‐ ments relative to socio‐economic or environmental issues, and impacts on the RTP and TIP.

8. The MPO will continue its work to integrate freight planning into the regional transportation planning process. The Freight Advisory Committee will continue to provide valuable input to the planning process.

9. The MPO will begin the development of its 2050 Regional Transportation Plan, which is scheduled for adoption in August 2019.

10. The MPO will contract with consultants to develop a Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan covering the counties of Shelby and Fayette in Tennessee, and DeSoto and Marshall Counties in Mississippi. The plan will encompass a uniied vision and goals; robust outreach; data collection/purchase; network analysis, connectivity, and routing database establishment. The Plan is expected to be completed by September 2020.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 100 Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 30

LONG RANGE PLANNING TASKS FOR FY 2018‐19

6. The MPO will work with its partners to continue planning for operations and Trafic Incident Manage‐ ment (TIM) in the Memphis region. Speciic activities under this task include an annual self‐assessment for incident management; regularly scheduled TIM meetings; and workshops, webinars, and other train‐ ing for regional partners on tools and strategies for incident management and planning for operations.

7. MPO will work with state, county and municipal engineers and planners to establish or modify speciic major road corridor alignments. Such work would include attendance at meetings, presentation of com‐ ments relative to socio‐economic or environmental issues, and impacts on the RTP and TIP.

8. The MPO will continue its work to integrate freight planning into the regional transportation planning process. The Freight Advisory Committee will continue to provide valuable input to the planning process.

9. The MPO will begin the development of its 2050 Regional Transportation Plan, which is scheduled for adoption in August 2019.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 101 NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item:AMENDED 6 FEB 21, 2019 Page 32

TASK D. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018 PRODUCT TIME FRAME COMPLETION DATE Transportation Facility Monitoring October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

DOT Model Assistance October 2017 ‐ September 2018 September 2018

DOT Freight Assessment October 2017 ‐ September 2018 September 2018

DOT Operations Evaluation October 2017 ‐ September 2018 September 2018

2050 Regional Transportation Plan October 2017 ‐ September 2018 August 2019

FY 2019 PRODUCT TIME FRAME COMPLETION DATE Transportation Facility Monitoring October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

DOT Model Assistance October 2018 ‐ September 2019 September 2019

DOT Freight Assessment October 2018 ‐ September 2019 September 2019

DOT Operations Evaluation October 2018 ‐ September 2019 September 2019

2050 Regional Transportation Plan October 2018 ‐ August 2019 August 2019

Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan March 2019 ‐ September 2019 September 2020

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 102 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 31

TASK D. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018 PRODUCT TIME FRAME COMPLETION DATE Transportation Facility Monitoring October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

DOT Model Assistance October 2017 ‐ September 2018 September 2018

DOT Freight Assessment October 2017 ‐ September 2018 September 2018

DOT Operations Evaluation October 2017 ‐ September 2018 September 2018

2050 Regional Transportation Plan October 2017 ‐ September 2018 August 2019

FY 2019 PRODUCT TIME FRAME COMPLETION DATE Transportation Facility Monitoring October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

DOT Model Assistance October 2018 ‐ September 2019 September 2019

DOT Freight Assessment October 2018 ‐ September 2019 September 2019

DOT Operations Evaluation October 2018 ‐ September 2019 September 2019

2050 Regional Transportation Plan October 2018 ‐ August 2019 August 2019

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 103 Organization

NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 AMENDED FEB 21, 2019 Page 33

FUNDING FOR LONG‐RANGE PLANNING (TASK D.)

2018 Funding PL‐TN SPR Sec 112 SPR PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $384,552 $89,536 $50,000 $25,000 $549,088 State $6,250 $6,250 $12,500 Local* $96,138 $22,384 $6,250 $124,772 Sub Total $480,690 $111,920 $62,500 $31,250 $686,360 TDOT Federal $55,294 $55,294 State $13,822 $13,822 Sub Total $69,116 $69,116 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $480,690 $69,116 $111,920 $25,000 $62,500 $31,250 $780,476

2019 Funding PL‐TN SPR Sec 112 SPR PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $484,552 $109,536 $50,000 $25,000 $669,088 State $6,250 $6,250 $12,500 Local* $121,138 $27,384 $6,250 $154,772 Sub Total $605,690 $136,920 $62,500 $31,250 $836,360 TDOT Federal $55,294 $55,294 State $13,822 $13,822 Sub Total $69,116 $69,116 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $605,690 $69,116 $136,920 $25,000 $62,500 $31,250 $930,476

* City of Memphis‐Shelby County and Desoto County provides the local match for the Tennessee and Mississippi portions of PL allocation (Section 112).

* *10% local match for PL‐TN (80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. MDOT provides the entire 20% match for 5303 funding in DeSoto County, MS.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 104 Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 32

FUNDING FOR LONG‐RANGE PLANNING (TASK D.)

2018 Funding PL‐TN SPR Sec 112 SPR PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $384,552 $89,536 $50,000 $25,000 $549,088 State $6,250 $6,250 $12,500 Local* $96,138 $22,384 $6,250 $124,772 Sub Total $480,690 $111,920 $62,500 $31,250 $686,360 TDOT Federal $55,294 $55,294 State $13,822 $13,822 Sub Total $69,116 $69,116 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $480,690 $69,116 $111,920 $25,000 $62,500 $31,250 $780,476

2019 Funding PL‐TN SPR Sec 112 SPR PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (TN) (MS) (MS) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $384,552 $89,536 $50,000 $25,000 $549,088 State $6,250 $6,250 $12,500 Local* $96,138 $22,384 $6,250 $124,772 Sub Total $480,690 $111,920 $62,500 $31,250 $686,360 TDOT Federal $55,294 $55,294 State $13,822 $13,822 Sub Total $69,116 $69,116 MDOT Federal $20,000 $20,000 State $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL $480,690 $69,116 $111,920 $25,000 $62,500 $31,250 $780,476

* City of Memphis‐Shelby County and Desoto County provides the local match for the Tennessee and Mississippi portions of PL allocation (Section 112).

* *10% local match for PL‐TN (80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. MDOT provides the entire 20% match for 5303 funding in DeSoto County, MS.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 105 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 34

E. AIR QUALITY & CONGESTION MANAGEMENT

PURPOSE

In recognition of the negative externalities imposed by automobiles on air pollution, The Clean Air Act requires EPA to set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for “criteria pollutants,” which include carbon mon‐ oxide, ozone, lead, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter.

On April 8, 2016 a inal ruling was published in the Federal Register (81 FR 20543) re‐designating the portion of Mississippi within the TN‐MS‐AR 2008 8 hour ozone nonattainment area to attainment area. The inal ruling was effective on May 9, 2016. On April 19, 2016 the proposal to re‐designate Shelby County to maintenance area was published in the federal register (81 FR 22948) with a 30 day comment period ending on May 19, 2016. The inal rule for the re‐designation to attainment was published on June 23, 2016 ((81 FR 40816), with an effective date of July 25, 2016. The West Memphis MPO is responsible for demonstrating conformity of the NAAQS for Crittenden County.

In 1978, the EPA designated Memphis, TN, a moderate (less than 12.7 parts per million) non‐attainment area for carbon monoxide (CO). Due to improvements in ambient air quality, EPA redesignated Shelby County to attain‐ ment for the CO standard on August 31, 1994 (See Figure 4). Since then Shelby County, TN entered into two 10‐ year maintenance periods. After the irst 10 year period, Shelby County, TN was redesignated as a maintenance area with the second maintenance period scheduled to end in 2017.

Tasks within this section are intended to monitor and assist the non‐attainment and maintenance portion of the Memphis MPO planning area so that it conforms to the NAAQS by evaluating the impacts of transportation im‐ provements and congestion management strategies and to insure that the transportation plans and programs conform to the purpose of the State Implementation Plan (SIP).

Figure 3: Ozone (O3) Attainment Area Figure 4: Carbon Monoxide (CO) Maintenance Area

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 106 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 35

PREVIOUS AIR QUALITY & CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TASKS

1. The MPO monitored and responded to DOT‐EPA transportation‐air quality planning guidelines (CMAQ guidelines and those relating to our changing non‐attainment status), prepared recommendations for air quality activities and transportation improvements, and assisted elected and administrative oficials in developing air quality goals and strategies.

2. The MPO reviewed RTP assignments to analyze mobile source emissions. Also provided assistance to local air pollution control agency in the development of mobile source emissions inventories.

3. The MPO continued the facilitation of the Regional Interagency Coordination Committee for Air Quality.

4. Participated in the Statewide Interagency Coordination Committee for Air Quality.

5. The MPO assisted TDOT and MDOT in the prioritization of projects for CMAQ funding.

6. The MPO provided transportation information and assistance to the Clean Air Coalition of MS & TN.

7. The MPO completed FY 2016 CMAQ Annual Reports utilizing the FHWA User Proile & Access Control System (UPACS) database.

AIR QUALITY & CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TASKS FOR FY 2018 ‐19

1. The MPO will contract with consultants to provide air quality modeling, conformity analysis, and travel demand modeling for the RTP and TIP.

2. The MPO will monitor and properly respond to DOT‐EPA transportation‐air quality planning guidelines (CMAQ guidelines and those relating to our changing non‐attainment status), prepare recommendations for air quality activities and transportation improvements, and assist elected and administrative oficials in developing air quality goals and strategies.

3. The MPO will review current and future RTP assignments to analyze and will contract with consultants to project future mobile source emissions. MPO will provide assistance to local air pollution control agen‐ cy in the development of mobile source emissions inventories.

4. The MPO will continue to work with its state and regional partners to maintain the Regional ITS Architec‐ ture.

5. MPO will conduct comprehensive interagency consultations for the nonattainment areas to ensure con‐ formity determinations are made in a timely manner.

6. MPO will continue facilitation of the Air Quality Committee, as needed.

7. MPO will assist TDOT and MDOT with the CMAQ funding process as needed.

8. MPO will provide transportation information and assistance to the Clean Air Coalition.

9. The MPO will continue to participate in the Statewide Interagency Coordination Committee for Air Quali‐ ty coordinated by Tennessee.

10. MPO will prepare annual CMAQ reports for FY 2018 ‐ 19 through FHWA UPACS system.

11. The MPO will work with its state and regional partners to update the Regional ITS Architecture.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 107 Organization NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item:AMENDED 6 FEB 21, 2019 Page 36

12. The MPO staff will prepare an updated Congestion Management Process, which contains established tech‐ niques for addressing air quality and congestion needs for the MPO planning region including data collection/ purchase. The task is expected to be completed by September 2020.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 108 NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 AMENDED FEB 21, 2019 Page 37

TASK E. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Air Quality Guideline Monitoring October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing Conformity Assessment for RTP October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Mobile Source Emissions/ October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required Inventory

Interagency Consultation October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Statewide IAC October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Air Quality Modeling October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

FY 17 Annual CMAQ Project Report November 2017 ‐ January 2018 January 2018

ITS Architecture Update October 2017 ‐ September 2018 September 2018

FY 2019 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Air Quality Guideline Monitoring October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing Conformity Assessment for RTP October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Mobile Source Emissions/ October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required Inventory

Interagency Consultation October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Statewide IAC October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Air Quality Modeling October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

FY 18 Annual CMAQ Project Report November 2018 ‐ January 2019 January 2019

Congestion Management Process March 2019 ‐ September 2019 September 2020

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 109 Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 35

TASK E. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Air Quality Guideline Monitoring October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing Conformity Assessment for RTP October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Mobile Source Emissions/ October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required Inventory

Interagency Consultation October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Statewide IAC October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Air Quality Modeling October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

FY 17 Annual CMAQ Project Report November 2017 ‐ January 2018 January 2018

ITS Architecture Update October 2017 ‐ September 2018 September 2018

FY 2019 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Air Quality Guideline Monitoring October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing Conformity Assessment for RTP October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Mobile Source Emissions/ October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required Inventory

Interagency Consultation October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Statewide IAC October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Air Quality Modeling October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

FY 18 Annual CMAQ Project Report November 2018 ‐ January 2019 January 2019

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 110 Organization NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item:AMENDED 6 FEB 21, 2019 Page 38

FUNDING FOR AIR QUALITY & CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLANNING (TASK E.)

2018 Funding PL‐TN PL‐TN Sec 112 Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (80/10/10) (MS) (MS)

MPO

Federal $156,000 $40,000 $39,616 $25,000 $260,616

State $5,000 $6,250 $11,250

Local* $39,000 $5,000 $9,904 $53,904

TOTAL $195,000 $50,000 $49,520 $31,250 $325,770

2019 Funding PL‐TN PL‐TN Sec 112 Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (80/10/10) (MS) (MS)

MPO

Federal $216,000 $40,000 $59,616 $25,000 $340,616

State $5,000 $6,250 $11,250

Local* $54,000 $5,000 $14,904 $73,904

TOTAL $270,000 $50,000 $74,520 $31,250 $425,770

*City of Memphis‐Shelby County and Desoto County provides the local match for the Tennessee and Mississippi portions of PL allocation (Section 112).

* *10% local match for PL‐TN(80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. MDOT provides the entire 20% match for 5303 funding in DeSoto County, MS.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 111 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 36

FUNDING FOR AIR QUALITY & CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLANNING (TASK E.)

2018 Funding PL‐TN PL‐TN Sec 112 Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (80/10/10) (MS) (MS)

MPO

Federal $156,000 $40,000 $39,616 $25,000 $260,616

State $5,000 $6,250 $11,250

Local* $39,000 $5,000 $9,904 $53,904

TOTAL $195,000 $50,000 $49,520 $31,250 $325,770

2019 Funding PL‐TN PL‐TN Sec 112 Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (80/10/10) (MS) (MS)

MPO

Federal $156,000 $40,000 $39,616 $25,000 $260,616

State $5,000 $6,250 $11,250

Local* $39,000 $5,000 $9,904 $53,904

TOTAL $195,000 $50,000 $49,520 $31,250 $325,770

*City of Memphis‐Shelby County and Desoto County provides the local match for the Tennessee and Mississippi portions of PL allocation (Section 112).

* *10% local match for PL‐TN(80/10/10) previously 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. MDOT provides the entire 20% match for 5303 funding in DeSoto County, MS.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 112 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 39

F. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

PURPOSE

Provide opportunities for citizens in the Memphis MPO planning area regardless of age, sex, race, color, national origin or disability, to participate in the transportation planning process, and develop new methods of public out‐ reach. The MPO follows all Title VI, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Limited English Proiciency guidelines in carrying out the regional transportation planning process, as described in the MPO’s Public Participation Plan.

PREVIOUS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION TASKS

1. The MPO maintained and updated mailing list of citizens and advocate groups.

2. The MPO updated and maintained MPO website and social media.

3. The MPO placed public and legal notices of plans, reports, meetings and public hearings in various media outlets.

4. The MPO distributed its quarterly MPO newsletter.

5. The MPO reviewed public participation techniques and monitored public involvement at MPO and related events and meetings.

6. The MPO translated plans and reports into Spanish as required.

7. The MPO conducted public meetings and hearings as necessary.

8. The MPO updated the Public Participation Plan. The update included redeining the role of the various MPO committees in the MPO activities, updating public involvement strategies to reach underrepresented groups and identifying additional outreach tools.

9. Completed the Annual Outreach Report.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION TASKS FOR FY 2018 ‐ 2019

1. The MPO will maintain mailing list of citizens and advocate groups wishing to be informed on transportation plans, programs and projects in the Memphis area.

2. The MPO will maintain a website and social media for MPO meetings and other MPO related activities.

3. The MPO will place public and legal notices with media outlets in the MPO planning area, including media that serve minorities and transportation disadvantaged groups.

4. The MPO will publish and distribute its quarterly newsletter.

5. The MPO will evaluate and assess the Public Participation Plan (PPP) to comply with the current trends and strategies.

6. The MPO will translate report executive summaries to Spanish as required.

7. The MPO will conduct public meetings and hearings as necessary.

8. The MPO will complete the Annual Outreach Report.

9. The MPO will continue to maintain & update Interactive Webmap to relect the status of projects included in TIP and RTP.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 113 Organization NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: AMENDED6 FEB 21, 2019 Page 40

10. The MPO staff will update the Public Participation Plan. The update will include reviewing the roles of the various MPO committees in the MPO activities, reviewing the current public involvement strategies to reach various stakeholders and underrepresented groups, identifying additional outreach tools to and updated data collection/purchase to improve the overall public outreach process. The task is expected to be completed by July 2020. [Task F: Public Participation]

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 114 NEW PAGE Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 AMENDED FEB 21, 2019 Page 41

TASK F. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Mailing list database October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Website Maintenance October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Public & legal Notices October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Quarterly Newsletter October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Quarterly

Public Participation Plan (PPP) October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing Evaluation Document Translation October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Public Meeting & Hearing October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Interactive Webmap Maintenance October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Annual Outreach Report October 2017 ‐ January 2018 January 2018

FY 2019 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Mailing list database October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Website Maintenance October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Public & legal Notices October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Quarterly Newsletter October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Quarterly

Public Participation Plan (PPP) October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing Evaluation Document Translation October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Public Meeting & Hearing October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Interactive Webmap Maintenance October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Annual Outreach Report October 2018 ‐ January 2019 January 2019

Public Participation Plan Update March 2019 ‐ September 2019 July 2020

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 115 Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 38

TASK F. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Mailing list database October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Website Maintenance October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Public & legal Notices October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Quarterly Newsletter October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Quarterly

Public Participation Plan (PPP) October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing Evaluation Document Translation October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Public Meeting & Hearing October 2017 ‐ September 2018 As Required

Interactive Webmap Maintenance October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Annual Outreach Report October 2017 ‐ January 2018 January 2018

FY 2019 PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE Mailing list database October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Website Maintenance October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Public & legal Notices October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Quarterly Newsletter October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Quarterly

Public Participation Plan (PPP) October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing Evaluation Document Translation October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Public Meeting & Hearing October 2018 ‐ September 2019 As Required

Interactive Webmap Maintenance October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Annual Outreach Report October 2018 ‐ January 2019 January 2019

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 116 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 42

FUNDING FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (TASK F.)

2018 Funding PL‐TN PL‐TN Sec 112 Sec 5303 Total (80/20) (80/10/10) (MS) (MS) MPO Federal $200,240 $50,000 $27,232 $25,000 $302,472 State $6,250 $6,250 $12,500 Local* $50,060 $6,250 $6,808 $63,118 TOTAL $250,300 $62,500 $34,040 $31,250 $378,090

2019 Funding PL‐TN PL‐TN Sec 112 Sec 5303 Total (80/20) (80/10/10) (MS) (MS) MPO Federal $200,240 $50,000 $27,232 $25,000 $302,472 State $6,250 $6,250 $12,500 Local* $50,060 $6,250 $6,808 $63,118 TOTAL $250,300 $62,500 $34,040 $31,250 $378,090

*City of Memphis‐Shelby County and Desoto County provides the local match for the Tennessee and Mississippi portions of PL allocation (Section 112).

* *10% local match for PL‐TN(80/10/10) previously 5303 TN, funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. MDOT provides the entire 20% match for 5303 funding in DeSoto County, MS.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 117 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 43

G. REGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PLANNING

PURPOSE

To identify and conduct planning and/or feasibility studies for future transit facilities within the MPO planning area by evaluating the costs, beneits, and impacts of major ixed improvements to corridors and conducting plan‐ ning and related analyses for potential sites of transit centers or park‐n‐ride locations. To participate with other public or private agencies in the development of mutually beneicial planning efforts such as master plans, sub‐ area plans, or corridor studies.

PREVIOUS TRANSIT PLANNING TASKS

1. MATA maintained an electronic database of transit infrastructure and future networks for use in travel demand modeling and long range planning.

2. MATA participated in the development of the UPWP, TIP, and RTP.

3. MPO staff attended the monthly MATA board meetings.

4. MPO & MATA conducted a paratransit survey to help identify existing gaps within its paratransit services.

5. The MPO conducted a bus stop design study to improve safety and access for MATA passengers while im‐ proving operating eficiencies for ixed‐route buses.

6. The MPO Staff and MATA completed work on the Alternatives Analysis study to determine the feasibility of integrating higher capacity transit into a multimodal environment that serves Midtown Memphis and connects other areas of the city and Central Business District.

TRANSIT PLANNING TASKS FOR FY 2018 ‐ 2019

MPO staff, in conjunction with MATA, FTA, MDOT, and TDOT, will coordinate the implementation of public transit planning activities. The MPO will coordinate the following activities with MATA, the primary agency for the trans‐ it planning.

1. Identify needed bus and rail service and facility improvements, evaluate costs for improvements, sched‐ ule improvements based on need and availability of capital funds.

2. Obtain and update local GIS data resources, and incorporate transit system data with socioeconomic and census information into the travel demand model.

3. Coordinate MATA’s APTS (Advanced Public Transportation Systems) program and ITS data sharing func‐ tions with TDOT, the City of Memphis and other local agencies as needed to insure that ITS strategies are integrated. These systems may include trafic signal priority projects, enhanced passenger information, ADA‐compliant on‐board announcements, and electronically delivered traveler information. These pro‐ jects should be coordinated with regional partners to maximize beneits from transportation technology investments.

4. Partner with public, private, non‐proit agencies and institutions or universities in the development of plans to improve public transportation infrastructure, service and utilization.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 118 Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 44

TRANSIT PLANNING TASKS FOR FY 2018 ‐ 2019 (continued)

5. Assist the MPO with the on‐going maintenance of the MPO’s Travel Demand Model by conducting sur‐ veys, evaluating model outputs using FTA’s Summit software, or other modiications speciied by MATA or as requested by FTA.

6. Assist the MPO, TDOT, MDOT, the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) and other agencies with planning activities related to transit investments such as the Tennessee‐Arkansas High Speed Rail Corridor Study or infrastructure projects such as the proposed Southern Gateway Pro‐ ject.

7. Monitor transportation and transit system performance.

8. Monitor Environmental Justice and Title VI impacts related to transit or transportation investments.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 119 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 45

TASK G. END PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE

FY 2018

PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE GIS Transit Planning Activities October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

Travel Demand Model Mainte‐ October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing nance Transit System Monitoring October 2017 ‐ September 2018 Ongoing

FY 2019

PRODUCT TIMEFRAME COMPLETION DATE GIS Transit Planning Activities October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Travel Demand Model Mainte‐ October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing nance Transit System Monitoring October 2018 ‐ September 2019 Ongoing

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 120 Organization Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 46

FUNDING FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT PLANNING ACTIVITIES (TASK G.)

2018 Funding PL‐TN PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $139,600 $60,000 $25,490 $225,090 State $7,500 $6,373 $13,873 Local* $34,900 $7,500 $42,400 Sub Total $174,500 $75,000 $31,863 $281,363 MATA Federal $60,000 $60,000 State $7,500 $7,500 Local* $7,500 $7,500 Sub Total $75,000 $75,000 TOTAL $174,500 $150,000 $31,863 $356,363

2019 Funding PL‐TN PL‐TN Sec 5303 TOTAL (80/20) (80/10/10) (MS) MPO Federal $139,600 $60,000 $25,490 $225,090 State $7,500 $6,373 $13,873 Local* $34,900 $7,500 $42,400 Sub Total $174,500 $75,000 $31,863 $281,363 MATA Federal $60,000 $60,000 State $7,500 $7,500 Local* $7,500 $7,500 Sub Total $75,000 $75,000 TOTAL $174,500 $150,000 $31,863 $356,363

* City of Memphis‐Shelby County provides the local match for the Tennessee portions of PL allocation (Section 112).

* *10% local match for PL‐TN(80/10/10) previously Section 5303, TN funding for MPO planning tasks will be provided by Shelby County. The City of Memphis provides the 10% local match for MATA planning tasks under the PL‐TN(80/10/10), previously 5303 funding program. MDOT provides the entire 20% match for 5303 funding in DeSoto County, MS.

FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program Page 121 Section III: MPO Tasks ETC Item: 6 Page 47

H. PLANNING CONTINGENCY

PURPOSE

The amounts programmed for Task H: Planning Contingency consist of a balance of Tennessee Section 112 (PL) planning funds for Fiscal Year 2018‐19. These funds may be used to cover cost increases for listed planning tasks or the inclusion of additional planning tasks as requested by the members of the Memphis Urban Area MPO. Any change in UPWP funding will be subject to the amendment/adjustment process, including a recommendation by the Engineering and Technical Committee and approval by the TPB, as described in Section II: About the UPWP.

FUNDING FOR PLANNING CONTINGENCY (TASK H.)

2018 Funding PL‐TN Total (80/20)

MPO

Federal $40,000 $40,000

State

Local $10,000 $10,000

TOTAL $50,000 $50,000

2019 Funding PL‐TN Total (80/20)

MPO

Federal $40,000 $40,000

State

Local $10,000 $10,000

TOTAL $50,000 $50,000

*City of Memphis‐Shelby County provides the local match for the Tennessee portions of PL allocation (Section 112).

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 122 Organization

ETC Item: 6

Section IV: UPWP Funding

Page 123 Section IV: UPWP Funding Page 49 ETC Item: 6

FUNDING SOURCES FOR PLANNING ACTIVITIES

Following are the funding sources that were used for planning activities in this UPWP:

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) Funds:

METROPOLITAN PLANNING FUNDS (PL‐Section 112):

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) annually allocates PL funding to all the MPOs in the nation for MPO planning related activities. These federal planning funds require local matching funds of 20% which is typically provided by local governments. The PL funds are used for paying MPO staff salaries, various MPO’s plans or studies etc. STATE PLANNING AND RESEARCH FUNDS (SPR):

This is another source of federal funds that are allocated under the FHWA’s State Planning & Research Program and these funds are administered by the Mississippi and Tennessee Departments of Transportation (DOTs). This fund requires a 20% match that may be provided either by the state DOT or by local jurisdictions. FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) FUNDS ‐ Section 5303:

These are federal funds designated for planning activities that support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, increase the safety and security of the transportation system, increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight, protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns, enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, promote eficient system management and operation and inally emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. These funds also require 20% match which are typically divided between state and local government, with each contributing 10%. FUNDS CARRIED OVER FROM FY 2017 TO FY 2018 ‐ 19:

For Tennessee, the total amount of FHWA PL‐Section 112 funds carried over from FY 2017 is estimated to be $2,536,899 and the estimated allocation for FY 2018‐19 is $1,965,022. For Mississippi, the total amount of FHWA PL‐Section 112 funds carried over from FY 2017 is estimated to be 417,832 and the estimated allocation for FY 2018‐19 is $500,090. For Mississippi FTA Section 5303 funds, the carryover amount is estimated to be $112,586 and the estimated allocation for FY 2018‐19 is $138,394. CONSOLIDATED PLANNING GRANT (CPG):

Tennessee receives a direct apportionment of FHWA Section 112 Metropolitan planning (PL) funds and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5303 planning funds. TDOT participates in the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) Program, where FHWA and FTA planning funds are combined into a single fund administered by FHWA. The funds are distributed to the MPOs and administered by TDOT’s LRPD in accordance with 23 CFR 420.109. The PL distribution formula gives each MPO a base amount plus an amount based on their 2010 Census Urbanized Area Population and the formula also retains a small portion for TDOT to use for the beneit of all the MPOs. The distribution formula for the 5303 funds is based on each MPO’s 2010 Census Urbanized Area Population. The funds originating with FHWA require a 20% local match, resulting in an 80% Federal/20% Local split. The funds originating with FTA also require 20% matching funds. TDOT provides half of the match, resulting in an 80% Federal/10% State/10% Local split.

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 124 Organization Section IV: UPWP Funding ETC Item: 6 Page 50

FY 2018 FUNDING BY SOURCE

490

58,961 FUND

TOTAL $31,373 $51,375 $51,375 SOURCE $125, $411,000 $115,878 $573,701 $100,000 $670,613 $2,813,700 $4,273,892

H

TASK $50,000

$50,000 Planning Contingency

G

120,000 TASK Transit $34,900 $10,000 $562,740

$139,600 $40,000 $2,250,960 $174,500 $181,863 $356,363

0

F

Public TASK

$34,040 $93,750 $250,300 $378,090 Participation

E SOURCE

BY ty Quali

TASK $49,520 $81,250

$195,000 $325,770 Air

D

FUNDING

Range

TASK $69,116 $25,000 $93,750

2018 $480,690 $111,920 Planning

$780,476 Long FY

C

Range

TASK

$34,520 $25,000 $50,000 $443,500 Planning $553,020 Short ‐

B

Surveil

lance TASK $21,265 $94,520 $25,000

$579,500 $106,250 $826,535 Data

A

$6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,373 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $20,000 $5,099 $4,253 $13,822 $23,174 TASK $49,836 $18,904 $6,904 $22,384 $9,904 $6,808 $114,740 $25,497 $25,000 $63,750

$640,210 $249,181

$1,003,638

Administration

SPR $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $80,000 SPR $20,398 $17,012 $55,294 $92,704 FUNDS FUNDS

Match Match Match FUNDS

TOTAL Sec 112 $199,345 $75,616 $27,616 $89,536 $39,616 $27,232 $4 TN MS

Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal

Sec 5303 112 Local SPR TDOT SPR MDOT PL (80/20) $512,168 $463,600 $354,800 $384,552 $156,000 $200,24 Local Match $6,375 $7,500 $5,000 $6,250 $5,000 $6,250 $15,000 Local Match $128,042 $115,900 $88,700 $96,138 $39,000 $50,060 TDOT Match $6,375 $7,500 $5,000 $6,250 $5,000 $6,250 $15,000 Sec 5303 MS $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,490 MDOT Match TASK PL (80/10/10) $51,000 $60,000 $40,000 $50,000 $40,000 $50,000 $ FHWA

FHWA PL/FTA

2016Uniied Planning Work Program Page 125 Section IV: UPWP Funding Page 51 ETC Item: 6

FY 2018 FUNDING BY AGENCY

TOTAL $71,748 AGENCY $115,878 $100,000 $110,000 $3,948,014 $4,273,892 ‐ ‐

Plan

H

Contin

gency $10,000 $717,855 $50,000 $50,000 ning TASK

G

00

TASK Transit $75,000

$281,363 $356,363

F

Public TASK

$378,090 $378,090 Participation

AGENCY

E

Quality

TASK

$325,770 $325,770 Air

EXPENDING

D BY

Range

TASK $69,116 $25,000

$686,360 Planning $780,476 Long FUNDING

C

2018

Range

FY TASK

$25,000 $528,020 Planning $553,020 Short ‐

B

Surveil

lance TASK $21,265 $25,000 $25,000

$755,270 $826,535 Data

A

TASK $25,497 $25,000 $10,000

$943,141 $1,003,638 Administration

State $5,375 $11,250 $5,000 $12,500 $11,250 $12,500 $13,873 State $5,099 $4,253 $13,822 $23,174 State $5,000 $5,000 State $5,000 $1,000 $5,000 $2,500 $20,000 $7,500 $11,000 Local $183,253 $139,804 $100,604 $124,772 $53,904 $63,118 $42,4 Local $1,000 $2,500 $7,500 $11,000 Federal $754,513 $604,216 $422,416 $549,088 $260,616 $302,472 $225,090 $40,000 $3,158,411 Federal $20,398 $17,012 $55,294 $92,704 Federal $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Federal $20,000 $8,000 $20,000 $80,000 $60,000 $88,000

Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal

TOTAL

MPO

MDOT MATA TASK TDOT

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 126 Organization NEW PAGE Section IV: UPWP Funding ETC Item: 6 AMENDED FEB 21, 2019 Page 52

FY 2019 FUNDING BY SOURCE

490

FUND

TOTAL $80,000 $92,704 $20,000 $31,373 $23,174 $51,375 $51,375 SOURCE $125, $411,000 $458,961 $114,740 $115,878 $573,701 $100,000 $670,613 $2,813,700 $4,273,892

H

TASK $50,000

$50,000 Planning Contingency

G

120,000 TASK Transit

$174,500 $181,863 $356,363

F

Public TASK

$34,040 $93,750 $250,300 $378,090 Participation

E SOURCE

BY ty Quali

TASK $54,000 $50,060 $34,900 $10,000 $562,740 $59,616 $27,232 $14,904 $74,520 $6,808 $81,250

$216,000 $200,240 $139,600 $270,000 $40,000 $2,250,960 $425,770 Air

D

FUNDING

Range

TASK $69,116 $27,384 $25,000 $93,750

2019 $484,552 $121,138 $605,690 $109,536 $136,920 Planning

$930,476 Long FY

C

Range

$7,616 $1,904 $9,520 TASK

$48,700 $25,000 $50,000 $194,800 $243,500 Planning $328,020 Short ‐

B

Surveil

lance TASK $21,265 $59,616 $14,904 $74,520 $25,000

$579,500 $106,250 $806,535 Data

A

$6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,373 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,099 $4,253 $13,822 TASK $25,497 $48,836 $25,000 $63,750

$640,210 $195,345 $244,181 $998,638

Administration

SPR $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 SPR $20,398 $17,012 $55,294 FUNDS FUNDS

Match Match Match FUNDS

TOTAL Sec 112 TN MS

Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal

Sec 5303 112 Local SPR TDOT SPR MDOT PL (80/20) $512,168 $463,600 Local Match $128,042 $115,900 Local Match $6,375 $7,500 $5,000 $6,250 $5,000 $6,250 $15,000 TDOT Match $6,375 $7,500 $5,000 $6,250 $5,000 $6,250 $15,000 Sec 5303 MS $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,490 MDOT Match TASK PL (80/10/10) $51,000 $60,000 $40,000 $50,000 $40,000 $50,000 $ FHWA

FHWA PL/FTA

2016Uniied Planning Work Program Page 127 Section IV: UPWP Funding Page 49 ETC Item: 6

FY 2019 FUNDING BY SOURCE

490

58,961 FUND

TOTAL $31,373 $51,375 $51,375 SOURCE $125, $115,878 $573,701 $100,000 $670,613 $2,813,700 $4,273,892

H

TASK $50,000

$50,000 Planning Contingency

G

120,000 $411,000 TASK Transit $34,900 $10,000 $562,740

$174,500 $181,863 $356,363

0 $139,600 $40,000 $2,250,960

F

Public TASK

$34,040 $93,750 $250,300 $378,090 Participation

E SOURCE

BY ty Quali

TASK $49,520 $81,250

$195,000 $325,770 Air

D

FUNDING

Range

TASK $69,116 $25,000 $93,750

2019 $480,690 $111,920 Planning

$780,476 Long FY

C

Range

TASK

$34,520 $25,000 $50,000 $443,500 Planning $553,020 Short ‐

B

Surveil

lance TASK $21,265 $94,520 $25,000

$579,500 $106,250 $826,535 Data

A

$6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,373 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $20,000 $5,099 $4,253 $13,822 $23,174 TASK $49,836 $18,904 $6,904 $22,384 $9,904 $6,808 $114,740 $25,497 $25,000 $63,750

$640,210 $249,181

$1,003,638

Administration

SPR $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $80,000 SPR $20,398 $17,012 $55,294 $92,704 FUNDS FUNDS

Match Match Match FUNDS

TOTAL Sec 112 $199,345 $75,616 $27,616 $89,536 $39,616 $27,232 $4 TN MS

Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal

Sec 5303 112 Local SPR TDOT SPR MDOT PL (80/20) $512,168 $463,600 $354,800 $384,552 $156,000 $200,24 Local Match $6,375 $7,500 $5,000 $6,250 $5,000 $6,250 $15,000 Local Match $128,042 $115,900 $88,700 $96,138 $39,000 $50,060 TDOT Match $6,375 $7,500 $5,000 $6,250 $5,000 $6,250 $15,000 Sec 5303 MS $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,490 MDOT Match TASK PL (80/10/10) $51,000 $60,000 $40,000 $50,000 $40,000 $50,000 $ FHWA

PL/FTA FHWA

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 128 Organization NEW PAGE Section IV: UPWP Funding Page 53 ETC Item:AMENDED 6 FEB 21, 2019

FY 2019 FUNDING BY AGENCY

TOTAL AGENCY $115,878 $100,000 $110,000 $3,948,014 $4,273,892 ‐ ‐

Plan

$80,000 $92,704 $20,000 $23,174

H

Contin

gency $50,000 $50,000 ning TASK

G

TASK Transit $75,000

$281,363 $356,363

F

$60,000 $88,000

$7,500 $11,000

$7,500 $11,000

Public TASK

$378,090 $378,090 Participation

AGENCY

E

Quality

TASK $11,250 $73,904 $12,500 $63,118 $13,873 $42,400 $10,000 $717,855 $71,748

$340,616 $302,472 $225,090 $425,770 $40,000 $3,158,411 $425,770 Air

EXPENDING

D BY

Range

TASK $12,500 $69,116 $25,000

$669,088 $154,772 $836,360 Planning $930,476 Long FUNDING

C

2019

Range

FY $5,000 TASK $55,604 $25,000

$242,416 $303,020 Planning $328,020 Short ‐

B

Surveil

lance TASK $11,250 $21,265 $25,000 $25,000

$588,216 $135,804 $735,270 $806,535 Data

A

$5,375 TASK $25,497 $25,000 $10,000

$750,513 $182,253 $938,141 $998,638 Administration

State State $1,000 $2,500 State $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 State $5,099 $4,253 $13,822 Local Local $1,000 $2,500 Federal Federal $8,000 $20,000 Federal $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Federal $20,398 $17,012 $55,294

Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal

TOTAL

MPO

TASK MDOT MATA TDOT

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan PlanningPage 129 Organization Section IV: UPWP Funding ETC Item: 6 Page 50

FY 2019 FUNDING BY AGENCY

TOTAL $71,748 AGENCY $115,878 $100,000 $110,000 $3,948,014 $4,273,892

H

$80,000 $20,000

TASK $50,000

$50,000 Planning Contingency

G

00 $10,000 $717,855

TASK Transit $75,000

$281,363 $356,363

F

Public TASK

$378,090 $378,090 Participation

AGENCY

E

Quality

TASK

$325,770 $325,770 Air

EXPENDING

D BY

Range

TASK $69,116 $25,000

$686,360 Planning $780,476 Long

FUNDING

C

2019 Range

FY TASK

$25,000 $528,020 Planning $553,020 Short ‐

B

Surveil

lance TASK $21,265 $25,000 $25,000

$755,270 $826,535 Data

A

TASK $25,497 $25,000 $10,000

$943,141 $1,003,638 Administration

State $5,375 $11,250 $5,000 $12,500 $11,250 $12,500 $13,873 State $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 State $5,099 $4,253 $13,822 $23,174 State $1,000 $2,500 $7,500 $11,000 Local $183,253 $139,804 $100,604 $124,772 $53,904 $63,118 $42,4 Local $1,000 $2,500 $7,500 $11,000 Federal $754,513 $604,216 $422,416 $549,088 $260,616 $302,472 $225,090 $40,000 $3,158,411 Federal $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Federal $20,398 $17,012 $55,294 $92,704 Federal $8,000 $20,000 $60,000 $88,000

Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal TOTAL

MPO

TASK MDOT MATA TDOT

2016Uniied Planning Work Program Page 130

NEW PAGE Section V: Appendix Page 54 ETC Item:AMENDED 6 FEB 21, 2019

APPENDIX A: OTHER STUDIES

The following is a list of other studies currently underway by the partner agencies:

1. City of Memphis Comprehensive Plan: Memphis 3.0 - Cost $1.8 million (Private funds) 2. Memphis Area Transit Agency (MATA): • MATA Strategic Plan –Cost $55,000 (MATA operating fund) • MATA Communications Plan –Cost $70,000 (Private non-profit fund) 3. Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) - Multimodal Corridor Study. The purpose of the Multimodal Corridor Study is to identify short-and long-term solutions for improving problem spots along entire corridors. The results will provide a prioritized listing of potential multimodal pro- jects that can be considered by TDOT or by local planning organizations. Interstates 55, 75 & 26 and 40 & 81 have been classified in the Tennessee Long-Range Transportation Plan as routes critical to statewide mobility and regional connectivity. The Plan classified routes needing improvement, while protecting and maximizing capacity over the next decade. The studies will also investigate a range of multimodal solutions to address future travel demands, with emphases on managing congestion, improving safety, maximizing the potential for freight diversion and preserving/ enhancing the corridors’ economic benefits. Both technical analysis and input from local officials and individuals are needed to provide as much data as possible (https://www.tn.gov/tdot/projects/transportation-studies.html). These studies will be completed in 18-months. The Interstate 55/75/26 Multimodal Corridor Study expected to be completed by March, 2020 and was budgeted for $1.8 million with $1,440,000 SPR funds and $360,000 state funds. The /81 Multimodal Corridor Study is expected to be completed in June, 2020, and was budgeted for $2.5 million with $2 million SPR funds and $500,000 state funds.

Page 131 FY 2018-19 Unified Planning Work Program Section V: Appendix Page 54 ETC Item: 6

APPENDIX A: OTHER STUDIES

The following is a list of other studies currently underway by the partner agencies:

1. City of Memphis Comprehensive Plan: Memphis 3.0 ‐ Cost $1.8 million (Private funds) 2. Memphis Area Transit Agency (MATA):  MATA Strategic Plan –Cost $55,000 (MATA operating fund)  MATA Communications Plan –Cost $70,000 (Private non‐proit fund)

Page 132 FY 2018‐19 Uniied Planning Work Program

ETC Item: 6

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Department of Regional Services

125 North Main Street, Suite 450

Memphis, TN 38103

901.576.7190 (phone)

901.576.7272 (fax)

Page 133