DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 245/Monday, December 22, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 245/Monday, December 22, 2014 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 76351 Felipe, New Mexico; Pueblo of Taos, human remains should submit a written DATES: Lineal descendants or New Mexico; Pueblo of Zia, New request with information in support of representatives of any Indian tribe or Mexico; Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the request to Sheila Goff, History Native Hawaiian organization not the Fort Hall Reservation; Standing Colorado, 1200 Broadway, Denver, CO identified in this notice that wish to Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South 80203, telephone (303) 866–4531, email request transfer of control of these Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the [email protected] by January 21, human remains and associated funerary Fort Berthold Reservation, North 2015. After that date, if no additional objects should submit a written request Dakota; and Wichita and Affiliated requestors have come forward, transfer with information in support of the Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, Waco & of control of the human remains to the request to the Arkansas Archeological Tawakonie), Oklahoma, were invited to Southern Ute Indian Tribe of the Survey at the address in this notice by consult but did not participate. Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado; Ute January 21, 2015. Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray History and Description of the Remains ADDRESSES: George Sabo, Director, Reservation, Utah; and Ute Mountain Arkansas Archeological Survey, 2475 In the 1920s, human remains Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation, North Hatch Avenue, Fayetteville, AR representing, at minimum, one Colorado, New Mexico & Utah may 72704, telephone (479) 575–3556. individual were removed from the back proceed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of a shallow cave in the vicinity of Bed History Colorado is responsible for Notice is Rock, CO, in Montrose County, CO. The notifying the Southern Ute Indian Tribe here given in accordance with the remains are of a naturally mummified of the Southern Ute Reservation, Native American Graves Protection and child, approximately five years old, Colorado; Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. with evidence of once having been & Ouray Reservation, Utah; and Ute 3003, of the completion of an inventory wrapped in a bark mat, which has now Mountain Tribe of the Ute Mountain of human remains and associated disintegrated. The human remains were Reservation, Colorado, New Mexico & funerary objects under the control of the donated to History Colorado (formerly Utah that this notice has been Arkansas Archeological Survey. The Colorado Historical Society) in 1924. No published. human remains and associated funerary objects were removed from multiple known individuals were identified. No Dated: November 3, 2014. associated funerary objects are present. counties in Arkansas. Melanie O’Brien, This notice is published as part of the Determinations Made by History Acting Manager, National NAGPRA Program. National Park Service’s administrative Colorado [FR Doc. 2014–29890 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 Officials of History Colorado have BILLING CODE 4312–50–P U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in determined that: this notice are the sole responsibility of • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the the museum, institution, or Federal DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR human remains described in this notice agency that has control of the Native American human remains and are Native American based on analysis National Park Service by a physical anthropologist. associated funerary objects. The • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the [NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–16901; National Park Service is not responsible human remains described in this notice PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] for the determinations in this notice. represent the physical remains of one Notice of Inventory Completion: Consultation individual of Native American ancestry. Arkansas Archeological Survey, • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), a A detailed assessment of the human Fayetteville, AR relationship of shared group identity remains was made by Arkansas cannot be reasonably traced between the AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Archeological Survey professional staff Native American human remains and ACTION: Notice. in consultation with representatives of any present-day Indian tribe. The Quapaw Tribe of Indians. • SUMMARY: The Arkansas Archeological Treaties, Acts of Congress, or History and Description of the Remains Executive Orders, indicate that the land Survey has completed an inventory of from which the Native American human human remains and associated funerary All of the human remains and remains were removed is the aboriginal objects, in consultation with the associated funerary objects listed in this land of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe of appropriate Indian tribes or Native notice were recovered by the Arkansas the Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado; Hawaiian organizations, and has Archeological Survey, unless otherwise Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray determined that there is a cultural noted. Reservation, Utah; and Ute Mountain affiliation between the human remains In 1979, human remains representing Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation, and associated funerary objects and a minimum of one individual (79–634– Colorado, New Mexico & Utah. present-day Indian tribes or Native 4) were recovered from the Menard • Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.11(c)(1), the Hawaiian organizations. Lineal Mound site (3AR4) in Arkansas County, disposition of the human remains may descendants or representatives of any AR. No known individuals were be to the Southern Ute Indian Tribe of Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian identified. The two associated funerary the Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado; organization not identified in this notice objects include two fragments of Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray that wish to request transfer of control ceramic vessels. Diagnostic artifacts Reservation, Utah; and Ute Mountain of these human remains and associated found at Menard Mound site (3AR4) Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation, funerary objects should submit a written indicate that these human remains were Colorado, New Mexico & Utah. request to the Arkansas Archeological probably buried during the Menard Survey. If no additional requestors come Complex (late A.D. 1500). Additional Requestors and Disposition forward, transfer of control of the At an unknown date, human remains Representatives of any Indian tribe or human remains and associated funerary representing a minimum of one Native Hawaiian organization not objects to the lineal descendants, Indian individual (85–815) were recovered identified in this notice that wish to tribes, or Native Hawaiian organizations from the Roland Mound site (3AR30) in request transfer of control of these stated in this notice may proceed. Arkansas County, AR. These human VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:27 Dec 19, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM 22DEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 76352 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices remains were transferred from the indicate that these human remains were from site 3CS40 in Cross County, AR. University of Arkansas Department of probably buried during the Late These human remains were donated to Anthropology to the Arkansas Prehistoric period (A.D. 1000–1600). the Arkansas Archeological Survey in Archeological Survey in 1985. No At an unknown date, human remains 1976. No known individuals were known individuals were identified. No representing a minimum of one identified. No associated funerary associated funerary objects are present. individual (76–311) were recovered objects are present. Diagnostic artifacts Diagnostic artifacts found at the Roland from an unknown site in Cross County, found at site 3CS40 indicate that these Mound site (3AR30) indicate that these AR. These human remains were donated human remains were probably buried human remains were probably buried to the Arkansas Archeological Survey in during the Late Prehistoric period (A.D. during the Mississippian period (A.D. 1976. No known individuals were 1000–1600). 900–1500). identified. No associated funerary In 1974, human remains representing At an unknown date, human remains objects are present. These human a minimum of one individual (74–1049) representing a minimum of three remains are believed to date from the were recovered from site 3CS60 in Cross individuals (68–287) were recovered Prehistoric period (11,560 B.C.– County, AR. No known individuals from the McBroom site (3AR46) in A.D.1600) based on the physical were identified. No associated funerary Arkansas County, AR. These human conditions of the remains. objects are present. Diagnostic artifacts remains were donated to the Arkansas In 1974, human remains representing found at site 3CS60 indicate that these Archeological Survey in 1968. No a minimum of one individual (74–1057) human remains were probably buried known individuals were identified. No were recovered from site 3CS9 in Cross during the Late Prehistoric period (A.D. associated funerary objects are present. County, AR. No known individuals 1000–1600). Diagnostic artifacts found at the were identified. No associated funerary At an unknown date, human remains McBroom site (3AR46) indicate that objects are present. Diagnostic artifacts representing a minimum of one these human remains were probably found at site 3CS9 indicate that these individual (87–649) were recovered buried during the Mississippian period human remains were probably
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1992
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127 IN aEPLy a£F£K TO: The Director of the Natlonal Park service is pleased to Inform you that the fol lowing properties have been entered In the National Register of Historic Places. For further Information cal I 202/343-9542. JAN 3 1992 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/23/91 THROJc:>1 12/27/91 KEY: state. county, ProPerty Name. Address/soundary, City, vicinity, Reference Nuntier N-IL status. Action, Date, MUitipie Name ARIZONA. c.ocoNINO co..NTY. Fjrst Baptist church, 123 s. Beaver St .• Flagstaff. 91001576, IIOMINATION, 12/23/91 ARIZONA, COCONINO COl.NTY. Pendley Homestead Historic District. us 89-A, 7 ml.Nor Sedona. Sedona vicinity, 91001857, NOMINATION, 12/23/91 CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COlNTY, The Bellevue-Staten. 492 Staten Ave .. 0akland. 91001896, NOMINATION. 12/27/91 CALIFORNIA, ORANOE CQU,ITY, Casa Romantica. 415 Avenlda cranada, San Clemente. 91001900. NOMINATION, 12/27/91 COLORADO, MONTEZUMA CQU,ITY, Mancos High school, 350 crand AVe., Mancos. 91001740. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 IDAHO. CARIBCX.J cou,rry_ Largllliere, Edgar waiter sr. HOuse. 30 west second south st .• soda Springs. 91001870. NOMINATION. 12/23/91 INDIANA, MARION oou,rTY. St. Clair. 109 w. ~t. Clair St., Indianapolis, 83000085. REMOVAL. 12/04/91 (Apartments and Flats of oowntown Indianapolis TR) IOWA. ALLAMAKEE cou,rry, Lans jng Fisher les Bui !ding. Between co. HWy. X-52 and the Miss lss lppi R.. south uns ing. Lans Ing, 91001832. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 <conservation Movement in 1owa MPS) IOWA.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarry-Margaret-CV.Pdf
    CURRICULUM VITAE (revised 07/28/2017) Clara Margaret Scarry Research Laboratories of Archaeology, CB 3120 Alumni Building University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27519 Phone: 919-962-6574 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION: Ph.D. Anthropology, University of Michigan, 1986 MA Anthropology, Northwestern University, 1975 BA Anthropology, University of Michigan, 1974 TEACHING, RESEARCH, AND ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS: 2016-pres Director Research Laboratories of Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2016-pres Chair Curriculum in Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2013-pres Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2013-2016 Adjunct Professor, Curriculum in Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2009-2016 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2008-2016 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Curriculum in Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2008-2013 Adjunct Associate Professor, Curriculum in Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2004-2005 Associate Chair, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2002-2004 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 1999-2001 Associate Chair, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 1999-2001 Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 1999-2013
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 76-21,106
    A POPULATION MODEL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF OSTEOLOGICAL MATERIALS Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Wolf, David Jay, 1942- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 09:25:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/289387 INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 26: the MISSISSIPPI DE SOTO TRAIL MAPPING PROJECT
    Archaeological Report No. 26 The Mississippi De Soto Trail Mapping Project David Morgan Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson, Mississippi 1996 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Archaeological Report No. 26 Patricia Galloway Series Editor Elbert R. Hilliard Director Typeset by Lesley Range ISBN: 0-938896-76-8 Copyright © 1997 Mississippi Department of Archives and History CONTENTS Introduction. ......................................... .. 1 Project Overview. ..................................... .. 1 Research Universe 2 Site Selection and Plotting Procedures .................... .. 2 Historic Overview. .................................... .. 3 Route Comparisons. ................................... .. 4 Site File Contributions. ................................ .. 5 Comments 7 Conclusion. .......................................... .. 8 Bibliography ........................................ .. 10 Index to Named Sites in Appendix III .................... .. 17 Diagnostic Ceramics by Region Appendix I Maps ...................................... .. Appendix II Site Inventory Forms . .. Appendix III (located on microfiche) List of Maps in Appendix II The Entire State of Mississippi Map 1 Inset A ......................................... Map 2 Inset B Map 3 Inset C . Map 4 Inset D ......................................... Map 5 Inset E Map 6 "Spaghetti" Map Map 7 The Mississippi De Soto Trail Mapping Project By David Morgan Introduction The route of the Hernando de Soto expedition through the state of Mississippi
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation Polygons
    Polygon Date & Period Archaeological Phase Cultural - Historical Source & Comment Hist or Arch Pop & Sites Group Estimate 1 early 16th century Little Tennessee site 16th century Chiaha mid-16th century, Little Tennessee site cluster cluster and sites 7-19 and sites 7-19, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Chiaha, three populations, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Little Tennessee cluster plus additional sites, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 2 early 16th century Hiwassee site cluster mid-16th century, Hiwassee site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Hiwassee cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 3 early 16th century Chattanooga site cluster 16th century Napochies mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century Napochies, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 4 early 16th century Carters site cluster; 16th century Coosa mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Hally et al. X Barnett phase 1990:Fig. 9.1; Barnett phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century Coosa, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 5 early 16th century Cartersville site cluster; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Hally et Brewster phase al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; Brewster phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 6 early 16th century Rome site cluster; 16th century Apica mid-16th century, Rome site cluster, Hally et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    An ethnographic perspective on prehistoric platform mounds of the Tonto Basin, Central Arizona Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Elson, Mark David, 1955- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 00:20:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/290644 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI fihns the text directly from the orighud or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fiice, \^e others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, b^inning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Expenditure and Mortuary Practices at Lyon's Bluff, 22OK520: an Evolutionary Approach
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2008 Energy expenditure and mortuary practices at Lyon's Bluff, 22OK520: an evolutionary approach Lorien Stahl Elmore Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Elmore, Lorien Stahl, "Energy expenditure and mortuary practices at Lyon's Bluff, 22OK520: an evolutionary approach" (2008). Theses and Dissertations. 1875. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/1875 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENERGY EXPENDITURE AND MORTUARY PRACTICES AT LYON’S BLUFF, 22OK520: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH By Lorien Stahl Elmore A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Applied Anthropology in the Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work Mississippi State, Mississippi May 2008 ENERGY EXPENDITURE AND MORTUARY PRACTICES AT LYON’S BLUFF, 22OK520: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH By Lorien Stahl Elmore Approved: _____________________________ ____________________________ Evan Peacock Janet Rafferty Associate Professor of Anthropology Professor of Anthropology Graduate Coordinator for Anthropology (Committee Member) (Director
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations in the Obion River Drainage: the West
    .~~- -~.- .~---~~~~~~~- ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE OBION RIVER DRAINAGE: THE WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES PROJECT by Robert C. Mainfort, Jr. with contributions by Jamie C. Brandon Emanuel Breitburg Shawn Chapman Mary L. Kwas William L. Lawrence June E. Mirecki Andrea B. Shea Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Archaeology, Research Series No. 10 1994 . ~4~\·JRobert C. Mainfort, . Principal Investigator ii Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Archaeology, Research Series No. 10 Copyright © 1994 - Tennessee Division of Archaeology TENNESSEE DEPARTrvIENT OF ENVIRONrvIENT AND CONSERVATION, DIVISION OF ARCHAEOLOGY, RESEARCH SERIES publications are isssued at irregular intervals. Individual volumes are produced by staff members and other qualified individuals in order to promote the exchange of scholarly information concerning the history and prehistory of the State of Tennessee. Copies of all publications in the series may be obtained from the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, 401 Church Street, 13th Floor, Nashville, Tennessee 37243, (615)532-1516. Pursuant to the State of Tennessee's policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs, -services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunityl Affirmative Action!ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, EEOlAAIADA Coordinator, 401 Church Street, 21st Floor, Nashville, TN 37243, (615)532-0103. Hearing impaired callers may use the Tennessee Relay Service (1-800-848-0298). Tennessee Department of Environment and Con­ servation, Authorization No.
    [Show full text]