Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 36/Friday, February 24, 2017/Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 36/Friday, February 24, 2017/Notices 11608 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR in this notice are the sole responsibility recovered from the Old River Landing of the museum, institution, or Federal site (3AR14) in Arkansas County, AR. National Park Service agency that has control of the Native No known individual was identified. No [NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–22814; American human remains and associated funerary objects were PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] associated funerary objects. The present. Diagnostic artifacts found at the National Park Service is not responsible Old River Landing site (3AR14) indicate Notice of Inventory Completion: for the determinations in this notice. that these human remains were Arkansas Archeological Survey, Consultation probably buried during the Mississippi Fayetteville, AR Period (A.D. 950–1541). A detailed assessment of the human In 1996, human remains representing, AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. remains was made by the Arkansas at minimum, one individual were ACTION: Notice. Archeological Survey professional staff recovered from the Wallace site (3AR25) in consultation with representatives of in Arkansas County, AR. No known SUMMARY: The Arkansas Archeological the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma, The individual was identified. No associated Survey has completed an inventory of Osage Nation (previously listed as the funerary objects were present. human remains and associated funerary Osage Tribe), and The Quapaw Tribe of Diagnostic artifacts found at the Wallace objects, in consultation with the Indians. These human remains were site (3AR25) indicate that these human appropriate Indian tribes or Native inventoried and documented by remains were probably buried during Hawaiian organizations, and has physical anthropologists at the the Mississippi Period (A.D. 950–1541). determined that there is a cultural University of Arkansas. At an unknown date, human remains affiliation between the human remains representing, at minimum, one and associated funerary objects and History and Description of the Remains individual were recovered from the present-day Indian tribes or Native In 1992, human remains representing, Roland Mound site (3AR30) in Arkansas Hawaiian organizations. Lineal at minimum, one individual were County, AR. These human remains were descendants or representatives of any recovered from the Massey Place site donated to the Arkansas Archeological Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian (3AR1) in Arkansas County, AR. No Survey in 1977. No known individual organization not identified in this notice known individual was identified. The was identified. No associated funerary that wish to request transfer of control two associated funerary objects include objects were present. Diagnostic artifacts of these human remains and associated two shell tempered bowls (catalog found at the Roland Mound site (3AR30) funerary objects should submit a written #2014–350–1, 2). Diagnostic artifacts indicate that the human remains were request to the Arkansas Archeological found at the Massey Place site (3AR1) probably buried during either the Survey. If no additional requestors come indicate that these human remains were Baytown Period (A.D. 400–700) or Coles forward, transfer of control of the probably buried during the Mississippi Creek Period (A.D. 700–1000). human remains and associated funerary Period (A.D. 900–1500). In 1968, human remains representing, objects to the lineal descendants, Indian In 1980, human remains representing, at minimum, one individual were tribes, or Native Hawaiian organizations at minimum, one individual were recovered from the Baker Brothers site stated in this notice may proceed. recovered from the Menard Hodges site (3AR45) in Arkansas County, AR. No DATES: Lineal descendants or (3AR4) in Arkansas County, AR. No known individual was identified. No known individual was identified. No representatives of any Indian tribe or associated funerary objects were Native Hawaiian organization not associated funerary objects were present. Diagnostic artifacts found at the present. Diagnostic artifacts found at the identified in this notice that wish to Baker Brothers site (3AR45) indicate request transfer of control of these Menard Hodges site (3AR4) indicate that these human remains were probably that these human remains were human remains and associated funerary probably buried during the Baytown objects should submit a written request buried during the Menard Complex (A.D. 1500–1700). Period (A.D. 400–700). with information in support of the At an unknown date, human remains request to the Arkansas Archeological At an unknown date, human remains representing, at minimum, one representing, at minimum, one Survey at the address in this notice by individual were recovered from the March 27, 2017. individual were recovered from the Menard Hodges site (3AR4) in Arkansas Gibbens site (3AR48) in Arkansas ADDRESSES: Dr. George Sabo, Director, County, AR. No known individual was County, AR. These human remains were Arkansas Archeological Survey, 2475 identified. No associated funerary donated to the Arkansas Archeological North Hatch Avenue, Fayetteville, AR objects were present. Diagnostic artifacts Survey in 1975. No known individual 72704, telephone (479) 575–3556. found at the Menard Hodges site (3AR4) was identified. No associated funerary SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is indicate that these human remains were objects were present. Diagnostic artifacts here given in accordance with the probably buried during the Menard found at the Gibbens site (3AR48) Native American Graves Protection and Complex (A.D. 1500–1700). indicate that these human remains were Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. In 1974, human remains representing, probably buried during the late 3003, of the completion of an inventory at minimum, one individual were Woodland Period (650 B.C.–A.D. 950). of human remains and associated recovered from the Moore Place site At an unknown date, human remains funerary objects under the control of the (3AR12) in Arkansas County, AR. No representing, at minimum, six Arkansas Archeological Survey, known individual was identified. No individuals were recovered from the Fayetteville, AR. The human remains associated funerary objects were Gibbens site (3AR48) in Arkansas and associated funerary objects were present. Diagnostic artifacts found at the County, AR. No known individuals removed from multiple counties in the Moore Place site (3AR12) indicate that were identified. No associated funerary state of Arkansas. these human remains were probably objects were present. Diagnostic artifacts This notice is published as part of the buried during the Kent Phase (A.D. found at the Gibbens site (3AR48) National Park Service’s administrative 1350–1600). indicate that the human remains were responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 In 1971, human remains representing, probably buried during the late U.S.C. 3003(d) (3). The determinations at minimum, one individual were Woodland Period (650 B.C.–A.D. 950). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Feb 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1 asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Notices 11609 In 1978, human remains representing, In 1968, human remains representing, recovered from the Burris #2 site at minimum, one individual were at minimum, one individual were (3CG218) in Craighead County, AR. No recovered from the Reback site (3AR66) recovered from the Weist site (3CG37) in known individual was identified. No in Arkansas County, AR. No known Craighead County, AR. No known associated funerary objects were individual was identified. No associated individual was identified. No associated present. Diagnostic artifacts found at the funerary objects were present. funerary objects were present. Burris #2 site (3CG218) indicate that Diagnostic artifacts found at the Reback Diagnostic artifacts found at the Weist these human remains were probably site (3AR66) indicate that the human site (3CG37) indicate that these human buried during the middle Mississippi remains were probably buried during remains were probably buried during Period (A.D. 1000–1350). the Woodland Period (650 B.C.–A.D. the Late Archaic Period (3000–650 B.C.). In 1971, human remains representing, 950). In 1969, human remains representing, at minimum, 12 individuals were In 1979, human remains representing, at minimum, one individual were recovered from site 3CG347 in at minimum, two individuals were recovered from the Old Town Ridge site Craighead County, AR. No known recovered from the Rounsaville site (3CG41) in Craighead County, AR. No individuals were identified. No (3AR73) in Arkansas County, AR. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects were known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects were present. Diagnostic artifacts found at associated funerary objects were present. Diagnostic artifacts found at the site 3CG347 indicate that these human present. Diagnostic artifacts found at the Old Town Ridge site (3CG41) indicate remains were probably buried during Rounsaville site (3AR73) indicate that that these human remains were the Late Archaic Period (3000–650 B.C.). the human remains were probably probably buried during the Mississippi In 1974, human remains representing, buried during the Woodland Period (650 Period (A.D. 900–1541). at minimum, one individual were B.C.–A.D. 950). In 1979, human remains representing, recovered
Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1992
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127 IN aEPLy a£F£K TO: The Director of the Natlonal Park service is pleased to Inform you that the fol lowing properties have been entered In the National Register of Historic Places. For further Information cal I 202/343-9542. JAN 3 1992 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/23/91 THROJc:>1 12/27/91 KEY: state. county, ProPerty Name. Address/soundary, City, vicinity, Reference Nuntier N-IL status. Action, Date, MUitipie Name ARIZONA. c.ocoNINO co..NTY. Fjrst Baptist church, 123 s. Beaver St .• Flagstaff. 91001576, IIOMINATION, 12/23/91 ARIZONA, COCONINO COl.NTY. Pendley Homestead Historic District. us 89-A, 7 ml.Nor Sedona. Sedona vicinity, 91001857, NOMINATION, 12/23/91 CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COlNTY, The Bellevue-Staten. 492 Staten Ave .. 0akland. 91001896, NOMINATION. 12/27/91 CALIFORNIA, ORANOE CQU,ITY, Casa Romantica. 415 Avenlda cranada, San Clemente. 91001900. NOMINATION, 12/27/91 COLORADO, MONTEZUMA CQU,ITY, Mancos High school, 350 crand AVe., Mancos. 91001740. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 IDAHO. CARIBCX.J cou,rry_ Largllliere, Edgar waiter sr. HOuse. 30 west second south st .• soda Springs. 91001870. NOMINATION. 12/23/91 INDIANA, MARION oou,rTY. St. Clair. 109 w. ~t. Clair St., Indianapolis, 83000085. REMOVAL. 12/04/91 (Apartments and Flats of oowntown Indianapolis TR) IOWA. ALLAMAKEE cou,rry, Lans jng Fisher les Bui !ding. Between co. HWy. X-52 and the Miss lss lppi R.. south uns ing. Lans Ing, 91001832. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 <conservation Movement in 1owa MPS) IOWA.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarry-Margaret-CV.Pdf
    CURRICULUM VITAE (revised 07/28/2017) Clara Margaret Scarry Research Laboratories of Archaeology, CB 3120 Alumni Building University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27519 Phone: 919-962-6574 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION: Ph.D. Anthropology, University of Michigan, 1986 MA Anthropology, Northwestern University, 1975 BA Anthropology, University of Michigan, 1974 TEACHING, RESEARCH, AND ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS: 2016-pres Director Research Laboratories of Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2016-pres Chair Curriculum in Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2013-pres Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2013-2016 Adjunct Professor, Curriculum in Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2009-2016 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2008-2016 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Curriculum in Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2008-2013 Adjunct Associate Professor, Curriculum in Archaeology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2004-2005 Associate Chair, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2002-2004 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 1999-2001 Associate Chair, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 1999-2001 Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 1999-2013
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Tristram R
    December 14, 2017 Curriculum Vitae Tristram R. Kidder Edward S. and Tedi Macias Professor and Chair Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis [email protected] Lab URL: http://pages.wustl.edu/kidder Education 1988 Harvard University: Ph.D., Anthropology 1987 Harvard University: M.A., Anthropology 1982 Tulane University: B.A., Anthropology Major Field/Research Interests: Anthropological archaeology; geoarchaeology, environmental archaeology, and the archaeological study of climate change; Indian cultures of North America; the formation of hierarchical social systems, the emergence of social complexity, and complex hunter-gatherer history; historical ecology, and the relationship between climate, landscape evolution, and human social change. Teaching and Professional Experience: 2017- Visiting Professor (summer term), Teaching and Experimental Center for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Protection, School of History and Culture, Henan University, Kaifeng 2008- Chair, Department of Anthropology, Washington University 2003- Professor of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis 2003- Professor of Environmental Studies in Arts & Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis 2003 Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 2002-2003 Interim Dean, Tulane College 1995-2003 Associate Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 1989-2003 Director, Center for Archaeology, Tulane University 1989-1995 Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 1988-89 Lecturer on Anthropology, Harvard University 1987-88 Instructor
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • 12,770 ± 320 GX-16. Waterville, Maine Shells 10,820 B.C. 12,210 ± 290 Duplicate of Above 10,260 B.C
    Geochron Laboratories, Inc. Radiocarbon Measurements II Item Type Article; text Authors Krueger, Harold W.; Weeks, C. Francis Citation Krueger, H. W., & Weeks, C. F. (1966). Geochron Laboratories, Inc. radiocarbon measurements II. Radiocarbon, 8, 142-160. DOI 10.1017/S0033822200000096 Publisher American Journal of Science Journal Radiocarbon Rights Copyright © The American Journal of Science Download date 01/10/2021 02:08:25 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/653882 [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 8, 1966, P. 142-160] GEOCHRON LABORATORIES, INC. RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS II HAROLD W. KRUEGER and C. FRANCIS WEEKS Geochron Laboratories, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts INTRODUCTION The following list presents dates on a small fraction of the total number of measurements made during 1964 and 1965 as well as data on some samples previously dated but not published. Results not appearing have not been released by our clients. Procedures of analysis are essentially unchanged from those reported previously (Geochron I). Additional counting equipment identical to that previously described has been installed during the past year. De- tails of the apparatus and procedure for separating collagen from the bone samples may be found in Krueger (in press). SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS I. GEOLOGIC SAMPLES A. Eastern United States 12,770 ± 320 GX-16. Waterville, Maine shells 10,820 B.C. 12,210 ± 290 Duplicate of above 10,260 B.C. Shells of Hiatella arctica, from pit on Drummond Ave., Waterville, Maine (44° 34' N Lat, 69° 38' W Long). Found in shelly till. Coll. 1957 and subm. by C. A.
    [Show full text]
  • An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-2004 An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas William Glenn Hill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Hill, William Glenn, "An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas" (2004). Master's Theses. 3873. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3873 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN INTENSIVE SURFACE COLLECTION AND INTRASITE SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS FROM THE COY MOUND SITE (3LN20), CENTRAL ARKANSAS by William Glenn Hill A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degreeof Master of Arts Department of Anthropology WesternMichigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 2004 Copyright by William Glenn Hill 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Foremost, my pursuit in archaeology would be less meaningful without the accomplishments of Dr. Randall McGuire, Dr. H. Martin Wobst, and Dr. Michael Nassaney. They have provided a theoretical perspective in archaeology that has integrated and given greater meaning to my own social and archaeological interests. I would especially like to especially thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Michael Nassaney, for the stimulating opportunity to explore research within this theoretical perspective, and my other committee members, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 76-21,106
    A POPULATION MODEL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF OSTEOLOGICAL MATERIALS Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Wolf, David Jay, 1942- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 09:25:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/289387 INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 26: the MISSISSIPPI DE SOTO TRAIL MAPPING PROJECT
    Archaeological Report No. 26 The Mississippi De Soto Trail Mapping Project David Morgan Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson, Mississippi 1996 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Archaeological Report No. 26 Patricia Galloway Series Editor Elbert R. Hilliard Director Typeset by Lesley Range ISBN: 0-938896-76-8 Copyright © 1997 Mississippi Department of Archives and History CONTENTS Introduction. ......................................... .. 1 Project Overview. ..................................... .. 1 Research Universe 2 Site Selection and Plotting Procedures .................... .. 2 Historic Overview. .................................... .. 3 Route Comparisons. ................................... .. 4 Site File Contributions. ................................ .. 5 Comments 7 Conclusion. .......................................... .. 8 Bibliography ........................................ .. 10 Index to Named Sites in Appendix III .................... .. 17 Diagnostic Ceramics by Region Appendix I Maps ...................................... .. Appendix II Site Inventory Forms . .. Appendix III (located on microfiche) List of Maps in Appendix II The Entire State of Mississippi Map 1 Inset A ......................................... Map 2 Inset B Map 3 Inset C . Map 4 Inset D ......................................... Map 5 Inset E Map 6 "Spaghetti" Map Map 7 The Mississippi De Soto Trail Mapping Project By David Morgan Introduction The route of the Hernando de Soto expedition through the state of Mississippi
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Expenditure and Mortuary Practices at Lyon's Bluff, 22OK520: an Evolutionary Approach
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2008 Energy expenditure and mortuary practices at Lyon's Bluff, 22OK520: an evolutionary approach Lorien Stahl Elmore Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Elmore, Lorien Stahl, "Energy expenditure and mortuary practices at Lyon's Bluff, 22OK520: an evolutionary approach" (2008). Theses and Dissertations. 1875. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/1875 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENERGY EXPENDITURE AND MORTUARY PRACTICES AT LYON’S BLUFF, 22OK520: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH By Lorien Stahl Elmore A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Applied Anthropology in the Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work Mississippi State, Mississippi May 2008 ENERGY EXPENDITURE AND MORTUARY PRACTICES AT LYON’S BLUFF, 22OK520: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH By Lorien Stahl Elmore Approved: _____________________________ ____________________________ Evan Peacock Janet Rafferty Associate Professor of Anthropology Professor of Anthropology Graduate Coordinator for Anthropology (Committee Member) (Director
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations in the Obion River Drainage: the West
    .~~- -~.- .~---~~~~~~~- ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE OBION RIVER DRAINAGE: THE WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES PROJECT by Robert C. Mainfort, Jr. with contributions by Jamie C. Brandon Emanuel Breitburg Shawn Chapman Mary L. Kwas William L. Lawrence June E. Mirecki Andrea B. Shea Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Archaeology, Research Series No. 10 1994 . ~4~\·JRobert C. Mainfort, . Principal Investigator ii Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Archaeology, Research Series No. 10 Copyright © 1994 - Tennessee Division of Archaeology TENNESSEE DEPARTrvIENT OF ENVIRONrvIENT AND CONSERVATION, DIVISION OF ARCHAEOLOGY, RESEARCH SERIES publications are isssued at irregular intervals. Individual volumes are produced by staff members and other qualified individuals in order to promote the exchange of scholarly information concerning the history and prehistory of the State of Tennessee. Copies of all publications in the series may be obtained from the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, 401 Church Street, 13th Floor, Nashville, Tennessee 37243, (615)532-1516. Pursuant to the State of Tennessee's policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs, -services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunityl Affirmative Action!ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, EEOlAAIADA Coordinator, 401 Church Street, 21st Floor, Nashville, TN 37243, (615)532-0103. Hearing impaired callers may use the Tennessee Relay Service (1-800-848-0298). Tennessee Department of Environment and Con­ servation, Authorization No.
    [Show full text]