DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Centur....Xml

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

G:\COMP\INFRA\TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTUR....XML TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21st CENTURY [Public Law 105–178, Approved June 9, 1998] [As Amended Through P.L. 114–94, Enacted December 4, 2015] øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of Public Law 105–178. It was last amended by the public law listed in the As Amended Through note above and below at the bottom of each page of the pdf version and reflects current law through the date of the enactment of the public law listed at https:// www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/comps/¿ øNote: While this publication does not represent an official version of any Federal statute, substantial efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. The official version of Federal law is found in the United States Statutes at Large and in the United States Code. The legal effect to be given to the Statutes at Large and the United States Code is established by statute (1 U.S.C. 112, 204).¿ AN ACT To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transpor- tation Equity Act for the 21st Century’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definitions. TITLE I—FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS Subtitle A—Authorizations and Programs Sec. 1101. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 1102. Obligation ceiling. Sec. 1103. Apportionments. Sec. 1106. Federal-aid systems. Sec. 1107. Interstate maintenance program. Sec. 1108. Surface transportation program. Sec. 1109. Highway bridge program. Sec. 1110. Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program. Sec. 1112. Recreational trails program. Sec. 1117. Appalachian development highway system. Sec. 1118. National corridor planning and development program. Sec. 1119. Coordinated border infrastructure program. Subtitle B—General Provisions * * * * * * * Sec. 1204. Statewide planning. Sec. 1207. Construction of ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities. Sec. 1210. Advanced travel forecasting procedures program. Sec. 1211. Amendments to prior surface transportation laws. Sec. 1212. Miscellaneous. Sec. 1213. Studies and reports. 1 October 9, 2019 As Amended Through P.L. 114-94, Enacted December 4, 2015 VerDate Mar 15 2010 12:49 Oct 09, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 9001 Sfmt 6611 G:\COMP\INFRA\TEAFT2C.BEL HOLC G:\COMP\INFRA\TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTUR....XML Sec. 1 TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21st CENTURY 2 Sec. 1214. Federal activities. Sec. 1215. Designated transportation enhancement activities. Sec. 1216. Innovative surface transportation financing methods. Sec. 1217. Eligibility. Sec. 1220. Elimination of regional office responsibilities. Sec. 1221. Transportation and community and system preservation pilot program. Sec. 1222. Additions to Appalachian region. Sec. 1223. Transportation assistance for Olympic cities. Sec. 1224. National historic covered bridge preservation. Sec. 1225. Substitute project. Sec. 1226. Fiscal, administrative, and other amendments. Subtitle C—Program Streamlining and Flexibility * * * * * * * Sec. 1307. Design-build contracting. Sec. 1308. Major investment study integration. Sec. 1309. Environmental streamlining. * * * * * * * Sec. 1311. Discretionary grant selection criteria and process. Subtitle D—Safety * * * * * * * Sec. 1402. Roadside safety technologies. * * * * * * * Subtitle E—Finance CHAPTER 1—TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE AND INNOVATION Sec. 1501. Short title. Sec. 1502. Findings. * * * * * * * CHAPTER 2—STATE INFRASTRUCTURE BANK PILOT PROGRAM Sec. 1511. State infrastructure bank pilot program. Subtitle F—High Priority Projects * * * * * * * Sec. 1602. Project authorizations. Sec. 1603. Special rule. TITLE II—HIGHWAY SAFETY * * * * * * * Sec. 2003. Occupant protection. Sec. 2006. National Driver Register. Sec. 2007. Safety studies. Sec. 2008. Effectiveness of laws establishing maximum blood alcohol concentra- tions. Sec. 2009. Authorizations of appropriations. TITLE III—FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION PROGRAMS Sec. 3001. Short title. Sec. 3002. Amendments to title 49, United States Code. Sec. 3010. Dollar value of mobility improvements. Sec. 3011. Local share. Sec. 3012. Intelligent transportation systems applications. Sec. 3015. Research, development, demonstration, and training projects. Sec. 3019. Bicycle facilities. Sec. 3021. Pilot program for intercity rail infrastructure investment from mass transit account of highway trust fund. Sec. 3027. Apportionment of appropriations for formula grants. Sec. 3030. Projects for new fixed guideway systems and extensions to existing sys- tems. Sec. 3031. Projects for bus and bus-related facilities. Sec. 3032. Contracting out study. October 9, 2019 As Amended Through P.L. 114-94, Enacted December 4, 2015 VerDate Mar 15 2010 12:49 Oct 09, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 9001 Sfmt 6611 G:\COMP\INFRA\TEAFT2C.BEL HOLC G:\COMP\INFRA\TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTUR....XML 3 TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21st CENTURY Sec. 1 Sec. 3033. Urbanized area formula study. Sec. 3034. Coordinated transportation services. Sec. 3035. Final assembly of buses. Sec. 3036. Clean fuel vehicles. Sec. 3037. Job access and reverse commute grants. 3038. Over-the-road bus accessibility program. Sec. 3039. Study of transit needs in national parks and related public lands. Sec. 3040. Obligation ceiling. Sec. 3041. Adjustments for the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 1997. TITLE IV—MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY Sec. 4001. Amendments to title 49, United States Code. Sec. 4003. State grants. Sec. 4007. Waivers, exemptions, and pilot programs. Sec. 4008. Safety regulation. Sec. 4010. Repeal of certain obsolete miscellaneous authorities. Sec. 4011. Commercial vehicle operators. Sec. 4012. Exemption from certain regulations for utility service commercial motor vehicle drivers. Sec. 4014. Safety performance history of new drivers; limitation on liability. Sec. 4017. Telephone hotline for reporting safety violations. Sec. 4018. Insulin treated diabetes mellitus. Sec. 4019. Performance-based CDL testing. Sec. 4020. Post-accident alcohol testing. Sec. 4021. Driver fatigue. Sec. 4022. Improved flow of driver history pilot program. Sec. 4023. Employee protections. Sec. 4024. Improved interstate school bus safety. Sec. 4025. Truck trailer conspicuity. Sec. 4026. DOT implementation plan. Sec. 4027. Study of adequacy of parking facilities. Sec. 4028. Qualifications of foreign motor carriers. Sec. 4029. Federal motor carrier safety inspectors. Sec. 4030. School transportation safety. Sec. 4031. Designation of New Mexico commercial zone. Sec. 4032. Effects of MCSAP grant reductions. TITLE V—TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Subtitle A—Funding Sec. 5001. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 5002. Obligation ceiling. Sec. 5003. Notice. Subtitle B—Research and Technology * * * * * * * Sec. 5112. Study of future strategic highway research program. Sec. 5113. Commercial remote sensing products and spatial information tech- nologies. Sec. 5114. Sense of the Congress on the year 2000 problem. Sec. 5115. International trade traffic. Sec. 5116. University grants. Sec. 5117. Transportation technology innovation and demonstration program. Sec. 5118. Drexel University Intelligent Infrastructure Institute. * * * * * * * Subtitle C—Intelligent Transportation Systems Sec. 5201. Short title. Sec. 5202. Findings. Sec. 5203. Goals and purposes. Sec. 5204. General authorities and requirements. Sec. 5205. National ITS program plan. Sec. 5206. National architecture and standards. Sec. 5207. Research and development. Sec. 5208. Intelligent transportation system integration program. Sec. 5209. Commercial vehicle intelligent transportation system infrastructure de- ployment. October 9, 2019 As Amended Through P.L. 114-94, Enacted December 4, 2015 VerDate Mar 15 2010 12:49 Oct 09, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 9001 Sfmt 6611 G:\COMP\INFRA\TEAFT2C.BEL HOLC G:\COMP\INFRA\TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTUR....XML Sec. 2 TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21st CENTURY 4 Sec. 5210. Use of funds. Sec. 5211. Definitions. Sec. 5212. Project funding. Sec. 5213. Repeal. * * * * * * * TITLE VIII—TRANSPORTATION DISCRETIONARY SPENDING GUARANTEE AND BUDGET OFFSETS Subtitle A—Transportation Discretionary Spending Guarantee Sec. 8101. Discretionary spending categories. Sec. 8102. Conforming the Paygo Scorecard with this Act. Sec. 8103. Level of obligation limitations. * * * * * * * SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. In this Act, the following definitions apply: (1) INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—The term ‘‘Interstate System’’ has the meaning such term has under section 101 of title 23, United States Code. (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Sec- retary of Transportation. TITLE I—FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS Subtitle A—Authorizations and Programs SEC. 1101. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. (a) IN GENERAL.—The following sums are authorized to be ap- propriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account): (1) INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.—For the Inter- state maintenance program under section 119 of title 23, United States Code, $3,427,341,000 for fiscal year 1998, $3,957,103,000 for fiscal year 1999, $3,994,524,000 for fiscal year 2000, $4,073,322,000 for fiscal year 2001, $4,139,630,000 for fiscal year 2002, and $4,217,635,000
Recommended publications
  • Maturity Schedule

    Maturity Schedule

    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 22, 2018 IN THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL, INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS EXCLUDABLE FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES UNDER EXISTING LAW, AND INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON INDIVIDUALS. SEE "TAX MATTERS" FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL. THE BONDS ARE NOT DESIGNATED “QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS” FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry-Only Insured Rating (AGM): S&P “AA” (stable outlook) Underlying Rating: S&P “BBB-” See “MUNICIPAL BOND RATING” and “MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE” herein. $5,570,000 FORT BEND COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 169 (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located within Fort Bend County) CONTRACT REVENUE BONDS (ROAD FACILITIES) SERIES 2018 The bonds described above (the “Bonds”) are special obligations of Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 169 (the “Master District” or the “District”) payable solely from and to the extent of payments required to be made to the Trustee (as herein defined) by the District and Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District Nos. 170, 171, 172 and 173 (the “MUD Participants”) from proceeds of an unlimited annual ad valorem tax, levied by each MUD Participant or from other revenues available to such MUD Participant (the “Road Contract Payment(s)”). Payment of Road Contract Payments by MUD Participants and use of such proceeds by the Master District to pay debt service on the Bonds is governed by the Contract for Financing, Operation, and Maintenance of Regional Facilities, as amended (the “Master District Contract”) as described more fully herein under “MASTER DISTRICT CONTRACT.” The Bonds are obligations of the Master District and are not obligations of the State of Texas, Fort Bend County, the City of Fulshear, any of the MUD Participants (except the Master District), or any entity other than the Master District.
  • Resolution #20-9

    Resolution #20-9

    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
  • The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD

    The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD

    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 9 September, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from August, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Before the end of 1925, the railroad was Buses adjacent to the railroad appeared in 3323, New York, New able to operate full electric service from St. the 1920s, but the railroad still made a profit. York 10163-3323. George to Tottenville, South Beach, and Ar- Several years later, railroad riding declined lington with 100 new M.U. electric cars. The because of competition from the buses. For general inquiries, or fleet was composed of 90 motor cars num- When the Isle Transportation Company sur- Bulletin submissions, bered 300-389 and ten trailers numbered rendered its franchise on February 23, 1947, contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s 500-509, of which five were eventually con- the Board of Transportation started operating website is verted to motors. Freight was also carried on the buses immediately, retaining the five-cent www.erausa.org. nearly the entire line, including the non- fare with several five-cent zones depending electrified track extending from Arlington on the distance. On July 1, 1948, bus fares Editorial Staff: across the bridge to Cranford Junction, New were increased to seven cents, zone fares Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder Jersey. Because the passenger service usu- were abolished, and passengers could buy a Tri-State News and ally operated at a deficit, the company was 2-cent transfer valid on subway lines at Commuter Rail Editor: unable to spend $17 million to extend the South Ferry, Manhattan.
  • City of Baytown

    City of Baytown

    CITY OF BAYTOWN NOTICE OF MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2012 5:30 P.M. BAYTOWN COUNCIL CHAMBER 2401 MARKET STREET BAYTOWN, TEXAS 77520 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF QUORUM 1. MINUTES a. Minutes - January 17, 2012 Consider Approving the Minutes of the Commission's Regular Meeting for January 17, 2012. b. Minutes - February 21, 2012 Consider Approving the Minutes of the Commission's Regular Meeting for February 21, 2012. 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION a. Receive citizen communication concerning the placement of two “No Parking” signs along Cinnamon Street in the Crockett Subdivision. Receive a citizen communication by Tammie Jones to remove two of the “No Parking” signs along the outside curve of Cinnamon Street and Curry Street that were approved by the City Council in accordance with Chapter 94 “Traffic and Vehicles,” Article II “Administration,” Division 2 “Enforcement,” Section 94-63 “Authority and duties of the Planning and Zoning Commission” of the Baytown Code of Ordinances. 3. BUSINESS ITEMS a. Election of Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson Discuss and consider the election of a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with Section 2-322 of the Baytown Code of Ordinances. b. Reconsider placement of "No Parking" signs within Crockett Park Subdivision. Consider a motion to reconsider the placement of certain "No Parking" signs within Consider a motion to reconsider the placement of certain "No Parking" signs within Crockett Park Subdivision. c. Discuss and consider a request by Tammie Jones, a resident of the Crockett Park Subdivision, to remove the “No Parking” signs at the following locations: outside curve of Cinnamon Street and Curry Street - Planning and Development Services.
  • Operations and Financial Analysis

    Operations and Financial Analysis

    OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APRIL 22, 2015 PREPARED BY: LOUIS BERGER WATER SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B) OPERATIONS ANALYSIS C) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS D) APPENDICES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Louis Berger was tasked by the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) to evaluate the Charm City Circulator (CCC) bus operation and analyze financial performance, and develop route operations alternatives that maximize ridership while minimizing costs. Objective The objective is to develop and evaluate alternatives to eliminate the annual deficits while providing maximum service to riders within existing financial resources. Description of Current System Existing Condition The CCC consists of four routes, Purple, Orange, Green and Banner providing “Fast. Friendly. Free.” service throughout downtown Baltimore 362 days per year, with hours of service varying by day type and by season. Key characteristics of each route: Purple Route- runs north - south from Federal Hill to Historic Mount Vernon. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses to operate. Heaviest ridership of all the routes. Orange Route- runs east – west from Historic Fell’s Point and Harbor Point in the east beyond University of Maryland, Baltimore in the west. Ten (10) minute headways require five (5) buses to operate. Ridership is second best in the system. Green Route- roughly U shaped route serves Johns Hopkins University Hospital East Baltimore Campus (JHUH) connecting south to Harbor Point and Harbor East, then northwest to park and ride lots, looping down near City Center then back around. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses. Longest route, least productive in terms of riders. Banner Route- angles southeast of the city past Federal Hill to Fort McHenry.
  • Chapter 12: Transportation Page 231 CITY of WESTMINSTER Transportation 2009

    Chapter 12: Transportation Page 231 CITY of WESTMINSTER Transportation 2009

    Transportation 2009 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Transportation 2009 Chapter 12: Transportation Page 231 CITY OF WESTMINSTER Transportation 2009 What is the Transportation Element? Community Vision for At the 1997 session, the General Assembly passed five Transportation pieces of legislation and budget initiatives known collectively as "Smart Growth." Maryland has adopted the principles of Smart Growth to be incorporated into the According to the 2008 Community Survey, Comprehensive Plan. Westminster drivers are concerned with the difficulties they encounter turning on and The following Smart Growth principle relates to the Transportation Element: off roads due to issues with visibility or merging. Some residents suggested that the Facilitate an adequate mix of transportation modes City should consider the addition of lanes, roundabouts, or left turn signals. A second To reduce traffic congestion throughout the City challenge with driving in Westminster is the To coordinate land use and transportation high volume of traffic. Residents describe traffic to be an issue on Route 140 during To create resiliency, and connectivity within the City commuting times in the early morning or road networks early evening because of the high number of To ensure connectivity between pedestrian, bike, commuters that leave Westminster everyday to work outside of Carroll County. transit, and road facilities From the timing to the synchronization, Revitalize existing neighborhoods into safe, residents listed challenges with traffic lights walkable, and livable communities throughout Westminster. In some cases, it is not the use of a traffic light, but rather the To mix land uses and build compactly, thus reducing lack of a traffic light that most concerned trips and make walking a more viable alternative residents.
  • Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful

    Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful

    Route(s) Description 26 The increased frequency on the 26 makes the entire southwestern portion of the network vastly more useful. Please keep it. The 57, 60, and 61 came south to the area but having frequent service in two directions makes it much better, and riders from these routes can connect to the 26 and have much more areas open to them. Thank you. Green Line The increased weekend service on the Green line to every twenty minutes is a good addition of service for Campbell which is seeing markedly better service under this plan. Please keep the increased service. Multiple Please assuage public concerns about the 65 and 83 by quantifying the impact the removal of these routes would have, and possible cheaper ways to reduce this impact. The fact is that at least for the 65, the vast majority of the route is duplicative, and within walking distances of other routes. Only south of Hillsdale are there more meaningful gaps. Mapping the people who would be left more than a half mile (walkable distance) away from service as a result of the cancellation would help the public see what could be done to address the service gap, and quantifying the amount of people affected may show that service simply cannot be justified. One idea for a route would be service from winchester transit center to Princeton plaza mall along camden and blossom hill. This could be done with a single bus at a cheaper cost than the current 65. And nobody would be cut off. As far as the 83 is concerned, I am surprised the current plan does not route the 64 along Mcabee, where it would be eq..
  • Park & Ride Commuter Lots

    Park & Ride Commuter Lots

    Park &RideCommuterLots Serving I–270 and US 29 Corridors in Montgomery County A Handy Guide to Free Parking and An Easier Commute to Work Effective July 2002 Tired of fighting the traffic ? Want to make your commute to work easier and less stressful? Spending too much money parking your car downtown? Need a place to meet your carpool or vanpool? Free Park & Ride Commuter Lots may be the answer to your quest. Commuters may park their vehicles in most of Montgomery County’s Park & Ride Lots at no cost. There are a few lots, however, that may require a parking permit and fee. You can meet your carpools or vanpools, or take public transit from these lots. Park & Ride...Make it easier for yourself. Use this brochure as a guide to Park & Ride Commuter Lots along the I-270 and U.S. 29 Corridors, including selected Lots in neighbor- ing jurisdictions. For more information on bus routes serving these lots, contact the following service providers. Montgomery County Commuter Services Free personalized assistance to help commuters join a carpool or vanpool. Promotes alternative trans- portation benefits for employees. The Commuter Express Store, located at 8401 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, sells fare media, such as Metrobus/rail passes, tickets, and tokens, and Ride On bus passes and tickets. Pick up timetables and transportation information (301) 770-POOL (7665) www.rideonbus.com (click on Commuter Services) Ride On Bus (routes, schedules, fares) (240) 777-7433 (touchtone) (240) 777-5871 (rotary) (240) 777-5869 (TTY/TDD) www.rideonbus.com (passes and tokens sold online) Prince George’s County THE BUS (301) 324-BUSS (routes & schedules) 1-800-735-2258 (TDD) Department of Public Works and Transportation (301) 925-5656–Office of Transportation www.goprincegeorgescounty.com CONNECT-A-RIDE A fixed route community–based bus service in the mid–Baltimore/Washington suburban area.
  • Prince George's County Transit System Map Thebus

    Prince George's County Transit System Map Thebus

    M ON TG MA D OM IN R ERY S ILL ST T M ND BO GORMAN 5 AV 2 N E M RD MANGU D C V 201 A !( A P P L InsetT 1 B E S L E 1 T D 5 IL M C N O Prince George's County TransitHER Anne Arundel County H US FederalN Courthouse RY W S LN T Y O E N C N GreenbeltV H L E ER A R A Southern District R P Y V D LN R A A R T T S I A D " 1 R G H R D 5 RO 3 T A C E I M 5 LT N BE W EN S GRE " Laurel Regional E N T Greenbelt L v® Hospital T T R P C TheBus System Map E VA K N N D N US Y E Metrorail Station A N C D T RD O 11 I R R S N D L E A T U G D L E J E E ID O R V O O R A R D !(197 C IVY LN W S D 11 15X 16 A E E P G W N D 2 B 5 E E O V E H O A L IVY D T D LN D O D R R I R 3 L R O R QU 5 N E O S £1 IS P H D ¤ S R W N I T N Y W L G HU H O D R D IL T R D O 15X N P O L E N SC S O D RE 11 R N T R N C L B U R W Y R A G 197 C O E K !( R T D E N R O N A D O P A E L S L YW H L I R N E M D B O C ER L L Muirkirk I D E 95 H E A C T B I H R §¨¦ M L I E G n¤ D C G N MARC Station G K T H S I Y O E A N R R N K I V H E G A N Y A R P R M W D R S I P H LA N S T Y K V S T E V P O O IE I R R O W T N I N C BREEZEWO N O I L OD CT F R A G R C R R R M T K H W A AP E L L P S D I D I E N L P W T O L M L N O UIRKI T A B N D E RK RD L E C E C B N T E T RD P B E N K E O L L B L A N M E T K E T D 1 BRE 16 A N £¤ A EZE D A E R N WOO I E M D DR S M L K E E O M H N A O N A E E C R N S I S M O H I R T T L T H S O W W I G M D L T N Y O E D C V A U T A L B E R PARATRANSIT DISTRICT 1 O N A D P S T K R O D B IT H E M L E W Y C O I A L L D L F R L Beltway Plaza 495V A E E E D ¨¦§E I R A R S R R BR
  • A Technical Report on a East-West Highway in Maine Maine Department of Transportation

    A Technical Report on a East-West Highway in Maine Maine Department of Transportation

    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 9-1999 A Technical Report on a East-West Highway in Maine Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "A Technical Report on a East-West Highway in Maine" (1999). Transportation Documents. 13. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/13 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Technical Report On An East-West Highway in Maine Prepared By Maine Department of Transportation September 1999 • Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Chapter I - Travel Demand and Travel Characteristics 3 Chapter II - Improving Existing East-West Highways 16 Chapter Ill - Concept of a 4-Lane Limited Access East-West Highway 48 Chapter IV - Innovative Financing Opportunities for Maine's East-West Highway 64 Application For Funding Under The National Corridor Planning and Development and Coordinated Border Infrastructure Programs . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 74 Appendix 78 - Introduction Public Laws of1997, Chapter 643, Part BB Introduction As ~encktl by PubJic Laws of 1999', Chapter 4, Part J Sec. B&,1, 81;udy. The CQDIJIJissjoner ofTransp0rtation shalls'tudy and develop a west-euthighway~ ~·State. The cQDIJIJissjoner shall make a prelintln8.ry report tO the iOint·stancijJlg cotnmittee .of the LegislatJire having Jurisdiction QVer ~iltion matteiil by J~ 1, 19'99 and aJinal report by July 1; 1999 on Jlllliters inclµding, but iwt limited to: . This report has been prepared in response to a law enacted by the 11 Sth Maine Legislature requirtng the Maine Department of t.
  • Official Statement Dated November 9, 2020 Cinco

    Official Statement Dated November 9, 2020 Cinco

    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 9, 2020 IN THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL, UNDER EXISTING LAW, INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS EXCLUDABLE FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES AND INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON INDIVIDUALS. SEE “TAX MATTERS” FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL. THE BONDS ARE NOT “QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS” FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. NEW ISSUE-Book-Entry-Only Insured Rating (BAM): S&P “AA” (stable outlook) Underlying Rating: S&P “A+” (stable outlook) See “MUNICIPAL BOND RATING” and “MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE” herein. CINCO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located within Fort Bend County) $19,515,000 CONTRACT REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2020 The Contract Revenue Bonds, Series 2020 (the “Bonds”) are obligations solely of Cinco Municipal Utility District No. 1 (the “Master District” or the “District”) payable solely from and to the extent of payments required to be made to the Trustee (as herein defined) by all utility districts within the Master District Service Area (the “Participants”) from proceeds of an unlimited annual ad valorem tax, levied by each Participant or from other revenues available to such Participant (the “Contract Payment”). Payment of Contract Payments by Participants and use of such proceeds by the District to pay debt service on the Bonds is governed by the Contract for Financing and Operation of Regional Waste Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities and Regional Water Supply and Delivery Facilities (the “Master District Contract”) as described more fully herein under “MASTER DISTRICT CONTRACT.” The Bonds are obligations of the Master District and are not obligations of the State of Texas, Fort Bend County, Harris County, the City of Houston, any of the Participants except the Master District, or any entity other than the Master District.
  • $1,545,000 Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No

    $1,545,000 Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No

    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED DECEMBER 3, 2018 IN THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL, INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS EXCLUDABLE FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES UNDER EXISTING LAW, AND INTEREST ON BONDS IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON INDIVIDUALS. SEE “TAX MATTERS” FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL. THE BONDS ARE NOT DESIGNATED AS “QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS” FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. SEE “TAX MATTERS—QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS.” Insured Rating (AGM): S&P “AA” (stable outlook) NEW ISSUE-Book-Entry Only Moody’s “A2” (stable outlook) Underlying Rating: Moody’s “Baa1” See “MUNICIPAL BOND RATING” and “MUNICIPAL $1,545,000 BOND INSURANCE” herein. FORT BEND COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 143 (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located within Fort Bend County) UNLIMITED TAX PARK BONDS SERIES 2019 The bonds described above (the “Bonds”) are obligations solely of Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 143 (the “District”) and are not obligations of the State of Texas, Fort Bend County, the City of Houston, or any entity other than the District. The Bonds, when issued, will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the District and will be payable from the proceeds of an annual ad valorem tax, without legal limitation as to rate or amount, levied against taxable property within the District. THE BONDS ARE SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS DESCRIBED HEREIN. See “INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS.” Dated Date: January 1, 2019 Due: September 1, as shown below Principal of the Bonds is payable at maturity or earlier redemption at the principal payment office of the paying agent/registrar, initially The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Dallas, Texas (the “Paying Agent/Registrar”) upon surrender of the Bonds for payment.