A Technical Report on a East-West Highway in Maine Maine Department of Transportation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
T and Analysis of Walkability in Hong Kong
Measurement and Analysis of Walkability in Hong Kong By: Michael Audi, Kathryn Byorkman, Alison Couture, Suzanne Najem ZRH006 Measurement and Analysis of Walkability in Hong Kong An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the faculty of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute In partial fulfillment of the requirements for Degree of Bachelor of Science In cooperation with Designing Kong Hong, Ltd. and The Harbour Business Forum On March 4, 2010 Submitted by: Submitted to: Michael Audi Paul Zimmerman Kathryn Byorkman Margaret Brooke Alison Couture Dr. Sujata Govada Suzanne Najem Roger Nissim Professor Robert Kinicki Professor Zhikun Hou ii | P a g e Abstract Though Hong Kong’s Victoria Harbour is world-renowned, the harbor front districts are far from walkable. The WPI team surveyed 16 waterfront districts, four in-depth, assessing their walkability using a tool created by the research team and conducted preference surveys to understand the perceptions of Hong Kong pedestrians. Because pedestrians value the shortest, safest, least-crowded, and easiest to navigate routes, this study found that confusing routes, unsafe or indirect connections, and a lack of amenities detract from the walkability in Hong Kong. This report provides new data concerning the walkability in harbor front districts and a tool to measure it, along with recommendations for potential improvements. iii | P a g e Acknowledgements Our team would like to thank the many people that helped us over the course of this project. First, we would like to thank our sponsors Paul Zimmerman, Dr. Sujata Govada, Margaret Brooke, and Roger Nissim for their help and dedication throughout our project and for providing all of the resources and contacts that we required. -
3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Scope of the Project 3.2 South Apron
3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Scope of the Project 3.1.1.1 Further to the recommendations of the Option Assessment and subsequent alignment developments detailed in Section 2 of this report, the preferred Trunk Road T2 is shown in Figure 3.1 and will comprise: • a dual two-lane trunk road of approximately 3.0km long with about 2.7km of the trunk road in form of tunnel; • ventilation and administration buildings and a traffic control and surveillance system; and • associated civil, electrical, mechanical, landscaping and environmental protection and mitigation works. 3.1.1.2 The works for the Trunk Road T2 project are grouped under the following major geographical headings: a) The South Apron Section – all works for the Trunk Road T2 Project located at the South Apron of the former Kai Tak Airport, including a ventilation building, a section of at-grade road, a section of depressed road, a section of cut and cover tunnel, a vertical launching shaft for the tunnel boring machines (TBM), a section of twin TBM tunnel and ancillary works. b) The Subsea Tunnel Section – all works for the Trunk Road T2 project in the sea between the South Apron and Cha Kwo Ling, including twin subsea TBM tunnels. c) The Cha Kwo Ling Section – all works for the Trunk Road T2 project located at the former Cha Kwo Ling Public Cargo Works Area (PCWA), including a section of cut and cover tunnel, a vertical receiving shaft for the TBMs, a section of twin TBM tunnels, a ventilation building and an administration building located inside the Lam Tin Interchange. -
Final Report
Transport and Housing Bureau The Government of the Hong Kong SAR FINAL REPORT Consultancy Services for Providing Expert Advice on Rationalising the Utilization of Road Harbour Crossings In Association with September 2010 CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PROVIDING EXPERT ADVICE ON RATIONALISING THE UTILISATION OF ROAD HARBOUR CROSSINGS FINAL REPORT September 2010 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES LIMITED CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PROVIDING EXPERT ADVICE ON RATIONALISING THE UTILISATION OF ROAD HARBOUR CROSSINGS FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page 1 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Report Structure ............................................................................................................. 1-3 2 STUDY METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Overview of methodology ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 7-stage Study Methodology ........................................................................................... 2-2 3 IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING PROBLEMS ............................................................. 3-1 3.1 Existing Problems -
South East Kowloon Development Comprehensive Planning and Engineering Review Stage 1: Planning Review
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION PLANNING DEPARTMENT Agreement No. CE4/2004 (TP) South East Kowloon Development Comprehensive Planning and Engineering Review Stage 1: Planning Review Technical Report No.4H Preliminary Sustainability Assessment (February 2007) CITY PLANNING – MAUNSELL JOINT VENTURE in association with Atkins China Ltd. Edaw Urban Design Ltd. ADI Ltd. Agreement No: CE 4/2004 (TP) South East Kowloon Development Comprehensive Planning and Engineering Review Stage 1: Planning Review (Feasibility Study) Preliminary Sustainability Assessment Table of Contents Abbreviation and Acronyms 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Purpose 1-1 1.2 Report Structure 1-1 2. REVISED PRELIMINARY OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2-1 2.1 Study Area and Major Proposals 2-1 2.2 Land Use Budget and Key Development Parameters 2-2 3. ASSESSMENT APPROACH 3-1 3.1 Sustainability Development 3-1 3.2 Purpose of Sustainability Assessment 3-1 3.3 Approach of the Present PSA 3-1 4. PRELIMINARY SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT 4-1 4.1 Economy 4-1 4.2 Natural Resources 4-4 4.3 Society and Social Infrastructure 4-7 4.4 Leisure and Cultural Vibrancy 4-8 4.5 Environmental Quality 4-9 4.6 Mobility 4-11 4.7 Other Major Considerations: Non-quantifiable Indicators 4-11 4.8 Other Major Considerations: Non-quantifiable Issues 4-17 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 5-1 5.1 Summary 5-1 5.2 Conclusion 5-5 List of Tables Table 2.2.1 Land Use Budget for the Study Area Table 2.2.2 Key Development Parameters Table 3.3.1 CASET Indicators Not Relevant to the Present Study Table 3.3.2 -
Transport Infrastructure and Traffic Review
Transport Infrastructure and Traffic Review Planning Department October 2016 Hong Kong 2030+ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PREFACE ........................................................... 1 5 POSSIBLE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT 2 CHALLENGES ................................................... 2 ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE STRATEGIC Changing Demographic Profile .............................................2 GROWTH AREAS ............................................. 27 Unbalanced Spatial Distribution of Population and Synopsis of Strategic Growth Areas ................................. 27 Employment ........................................................................3 Strategic Traffic and Transport Directions ........................ 30 Increasing Growth in Private Vehicles .................................6 Possible Traffic and Transport Arrangements ................. 32 Increasing Cross-boundary Travel with Pearl River Delta Region .......................................................................7 3 FUTURE TRANSPORT NETWORK ................... 9 Railways as Backbone ...........................................................9 Future Highway Network at a Glance ................................11 Connecting with Neighbouring Areas in the Region ........12 Transport System Performance ..........................................15 4 STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTIONS FROM TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT PERSPECTIVE ................................................. 19 Transport and Land Use Optimisation ...............................19 Railways Continue to be -
Tseung Kwan O - 及 Lam Tin Tunnel Cross Bay Link
Tseung Kwan O - 及 Lam Tin Tunnel Cross Bay Link Proposed Scheme – Consultation Digest Kwun Tong Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tiu Keng Leng TKO Town Centre South Yau Tong Junk Bay Lam Tin Interchange TKO Area 86 January 2012 Project Information Legends: Benefits Proposed Interchange • Upon completion of Route 6, the new road • The existing Tseung Kwan O Tunnel is operating Kai Tak Tseung Kwan O - Lam Tin Tunnel network will relieve the existing heavily near its maximum capacity at peak hours. The trafficked road network in the central and TKO-LT Tunnel and CBL will relieve the existing Kowloon Bay Cross Bay Link eastern Kowloon areas, and hence reduce travel traffic congestion and cater for the anticipated Kwun Tong Trunk Road T2 time for vehicles across these areas and related traffic generated from the planned development Yau Ma Tei Central Kowloon Route environmental impacts. of Tseung Kwan O. To Kwa Wan Lam Tin Tseung Kwan O Table 1: Traffic Improvement - Kwun Tong District Yau Tong From Yau Tong to Journey Time West Kowloon Area (Peak Hour) Current (2012) 22 min. Schematic Alignment of Route 6 and Cross Bay Link Via Route 6 8 min. Traffic Congestion at TKO Tunnel The Tseung Kwan O - Lam Tin Tunnel (TKO-LT Tunnel) At present, the existing Tseung Kwan O Tunnel is towards Kowloon in the morning is a dual-two lane highway of approximately 4.2km the main connection between Tseung Kwan O and Table 2: Traffic Improvement - Tseung Kwan O long, connecting Tseung Kwan O (TKO) and East urban areas of Kowloon. -
Resolution #20-9
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public. -
3658A PSL Holder: Kwoon Chung Motors Co
運 輸 署 TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT PSL No.: 3658A PSL Holder: Kwoon Chung Motors Co. Ltd. SCHEDULE OF SERVICE CONTRACT HIRE (A08) SERVICE WITH SPECIFIED ROUTES I. ROUTE Route 1 SUNSHINE CITY PLAZA to SHATIN PLAZA : via. On Luk Street, Sai Sha Road, Ma On Shan Road, Tate’s Cairn Highway, Sha Tin Wai Road, Sha Tin Rural Committee Road, Yuen Wo Road. SHATIN PLAZA to SUNSHINE CITY PLAZA : via. Yuen Wo Road, Tam Kon Po Street, Sha Tin Centre Street, Wang Pok Street, Yuen Wo Road, Sha Tin Rural Committee Road, Sha Tin Wai Road, Tate’s Cairn Highway, Ma On Shan Road and On Luk Street. Route 2 SUNSHINE CITY PLAZA to MA ON SHAN (CIRCULAR) : via On Luk Street, Sai Sha Road, Hang Fai Street, Ning Tai Road, Po Tai Street, Hang Tai Road, Hang Shun Street, Tai Shui Hang North Street, Hang Shun Street, Hang Tai Road, Ma On Shan Road and On Luk Street II. STOPPING PLACES Route 1 *#1. Sunshine City Plaza carpark *#2. Yuen Wo Road, general lay-by near Sha Tin Town Hall Route 2 *#1. Sunshine City Plaza carpark *#2. Po Tai Street, bus stop near Ocean View *#3. Ning Tai Road, bus stop near Mountain Shore *#4. Ning Tai Road, bus stop near Kam Tai Court *#5. Tai Shui Hang North Street, public carpark * Picking up only # Setting down only III. TIMETABLE Route 1 Saturdays, Sundays and Public Holidays From Sunshine City Plaza Headways (minutes) 10.30 am – 11.30 am 20 11.30 am – 12.50 pm 40 12.50 pm – 1.50 pm 20 1.50 pm – 2.30 pm 40 2.30 pm – 5.30 pm 20 5.30 pm – 6.50 pm 40 6.50 pm – 7.30 pm 20 7.30 pm – 8.00 pm 30 From Shatin Plaza Headways (minutes) 10.30 am – 11.05 am 35 11.05 am – 12.05 pm 20 12.05 pm – 1.25 pm 40 1.25 pm – 2.25 pm 20 2.25 pm – 3.05 pm 40 3.05 pm – 6.05 pm 20 6.05 pm – 7.25 pm 40 7.25 pm – 7.45 pm 20 7.45 pm – 8.00 pm 15 Route 2 Daily From Sunshine City Plaza Headways (minutes) 10.00 am – 11.45 am 15 11.45 am – 12.45 pm 30 12.45 am – 1.00 pm 15 1.00 pm – 2.00 pm 30 2.00 pm – 6.15 pm 15 6.15 pm – 7.45 pm 30 7.45 pm – 9.00 pm 15 IV. -
2021 LIMITED ACCESS STATE NUMBERED HIGHWAYS As of December 31, 2020
2021 LIMITED ACCESS STATE NUMBERED HIGHWAYS As of December 31, 2020 CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF Transportation BUREAU OF POLICY AND PLANNING Office of Roadway Information Systems Roadway INVENTORY SECTION INTRODUCTION Each year, the Roadway Inventory Section within the Office of Roadway Information Systems produces this document entitled "Limited Access - State Numbered Highways," which lists all the limited access state highways in Connecticut. Limited access highways are defined as those that the Commissioner, with the advice and consent of the Governor and the Attorney General, designates as limited access highways to allow access only at highway intersections or designated points. This is provided by Section 13b-27 of the Connecticut General Statutes. This document is distributed within the Department of Transportation and the Division Office of the Federal Highway Administration for information and use. The primary purpose to produce this document is to provide a certified copy to the Office of the State Traffic Administration (OSTA). The OSTA utilizes this annual listing to comply with Section 14-298 of the Connecticut General Statutes. This statute, among other directives, requires the OSTA to publish annually a list of limited access highways. In compliance with this statute, each year the OSTA publishes the listing on the Department of Transportation’s website (http://www.ct.gov/dot/osta). The following is a complete listing of all state numbered limited access highways in Connecticut and includes copies of Connecticut General Statute Section 13b-27 (Limited Access Highways) and Section 14-298 (Office of the State Traffic Administration). It should be noted that only those highways having a State Route Number, State Road Number, Interstate Route Number or United States Route Number are listed. -
The 4Th Meeting Of
The 7th and 8th Meeting of The Traffic and Transport Committee (TTC) of the Kowloon City District Council (KCDC) Date : 4 March 2021 (Thursday) Time : 2:30 p.m. Venue : Conference Room, Kowloon City District Office 7/F, Kowloon City Government Offices 42 Bailey Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon Agenda Paper No. 1. Confirmation of Minutes of Last Meeting 2. Matters Arising Concern over the Arrangements for Kowloon GMB Route 6 112/20 Strong Request for Strengthening Law Enforcement at Traffic Black Spots 124/20 in Hung Hom Old District and Establishing No Parking Zones on the Road Surface The Vetting and Approval of the Application for Study on Public 02/21 Transport Demand in Kowloon City District New Items 3. The Vetting and Approval of the Application for Implementing the 03/21 Publicity Programme on Road and Cycling Safety in Kowloon City District 4. Bus Route Planning Programme 2021-2022 of Kowloon City District 04/21 5. Strong Request for Providing Priority Seats and Real-time Bus Arrival 05/21 Information Display Panels at the Bus Stop off the Civil Engineering and Development Department in Chung Man Street 6. Concern over the Location for and Progress of the Reprovisioning of the 06/21 Red Light Camera at the Junction of Hung Hom Road and Tak Man Street 7. Multi-modal” Environmentally Friendly Linkage System 07/21 8. Call for Setting up a GMB Stop for Route 2/2A off Braemar Court in Ma 08/21 Tau Wai Road 9. Following up the Construction of a Canopy at the GMB Stop for Route 8 09/21 off Staircase No. -
The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD
ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 9 September, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from August, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Before the end of 1925, the railroad was Buses adjacent to the railroad appeared in 3323, New York, New able to operate full electric service from St. the 1920s, but the railroad still made a profit. York 10163-3323. George to Tottenville, South Beach, and Ar- Several years later, railroad riding declined lington with 100 new M.U. electric cars. The because of competition from the buses. For general inquiries, or fleet was composed of 90 motor cars num- When the Isle Transportation Company sur- Bulletin submissions, bered 300-389 and ten trailers numbered rendered its franchise on February 23, 1947, contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s 500-509, of which five were eventually con- the Board of Transportation started operating website is verted to motors. Freight was also carried on the buses immediately, retaining the five-cent www.erausa.org. nearly the entire line, including the non- fare with several five-cent zones depending electrified track extending from Arlington on the distance. On July 1, 1948, bus fares Editorial Staff: across the bridge to Cranford Junction, New were increased to seven cents, zone fares Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder Jersey. Because the passenger service usu- were abolished, and passengers could buy a Tri-State News and ally operated at a deficit, the company was 2-cent transfer valid on subway lines at Commuter Rail Editor: unable to spend $17 million to extend the South Ferry, Manhattan. -
Operations and Financial Analysis
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APRIL 22, 2015 PREPARED BY: LOUIS BERGER WATER SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B) OPERATIONS ANALYSIS C) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS D) APPENDICES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Louis Berger was tasked by the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) to evaluate the Charm City Circulator (CCC) bus operation and analyze financial performance, and develop route operations alternatives that maximize ridership while minimizing costs. Objective The objective is to develop and evaluate alternatives to eliminate the annual deficits while providing maximum service to riders within existing financial resources. Description of Current System Existing Condition The CCC consists of four routes, Purple, Orange, Green and Banner providing “Fast. Friendly. Free.” service throughout downtown Baltimore 362 days per year, with hours of service varying by day type and by season. Key characteristics of each route: Purple Route- runs north - south from Federal Hill to Historic Mount Vernon. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses to operate. Heaviest ridership of all the routes. Orange Route- runs east – west from Historic Fell’s Point and Harbor Point in the east beyond University of Maryland, Baltimore in the west. Ten (10) minute headways require five (5) buses to operate. Ridership is second best in the system. Green Route- roughly U shaped route serves Johns Hopkins University Hospital East Baltimore Campus (JHUH) connecting south to Harbor Point and Harbor East, then northwest to park and ride lots, looping down near City Center then back around. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses. Longest route, least productive in terms of riders. Banner Route- angles southeast of the city past Federal Hill to Fort McHenry.