LIST OF ACRONYMS
AO – Assisting Organization AP – Assisting Professional BOT – Board of Trustees AWP – Annual Work Plan CAMADA – Capalonga Mangrove Development Assn., Inc. CBFM CB – Community-based Forest Management CBFMA – Community-based Forest Management Agreement CMCI – Countryside Multiline Cooperative, Inc. CO – Community Organizing CRMF – Community Resource Management Framework CSD – Comprehensive Site Development DAO – Department Administrative Order DENR – Department of Environment and Natural Resources FSP – Forestry Sector Project GIS – Geographic Information System GPS – Global Positioning Satellite System IEC – Information, Education, Campaign IGP – Income Generating Project LGU – Local Government Unit MC - Memorandum Circular M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation NGO – Non-government Organization O/M – Operation & Maintenance PanFERD – Paniman Foundation for Env’tal Research & Dev’t. PO – Peoples Organization QCP – Quarterly Commitment Plan SMP – Survey, Mapping, and Planning SUSIMO – Subproject Site Management Office WMC – Wellspring Management Corp.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ------i
I. Subproject Description ------1 1. Purpose/ Objectives 2. Subproject Scope and Dimension A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope and Dimensions B. Reasons for Revision/ Modification Of Scope and Dimensions C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sectors
II. Subproject Implementation ------11 1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject 2. Implementation Period 3. Subproject Cost 4. Comments on Performance of AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors 5. Other Matters Relating to Subproject Implementation
III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO ------20 Relating to Recommendation(s)
IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance Of the Subproject Facilities ------21 1. Present Condition of Facilities 2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance 3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure For Operation and Maintenance (by year) 4. Maintenance Method
V. Benefits Derived from the Project ------31 1. Indirect Effects
VI. Conclusions and Recommendations ------33
LIST OF TABLES:
Table 1 : Trainings Attended by the PO ------34
Table 2 : Subproject Performance ------35
Table 3 : Subproject Site Management Office Equipments ------36
Table 4 : Trainings Attended by the SUSIMO ------37
Table 5a : Water System Livelihood Project ------38
Table 5b : Mud Crab Fattening Livelihood Project ------39
Table 5c : Micro Lending Livelihood Project ------40
Table 6 : Subproject Status Report ------41
Table 7 : Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity ------42
Table 8a : Cost Estimate for Enrichment Planting Per Activity ------43
Table 8b : Cost Estimate for Reforestation Plantation Per Activity ------44
Table 8c : Cost Estimate for Nipa Plantation Per Activity ------45
Table 9 : Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity ------46
Table 10 : Infrastructure Project ------47
Table 11 : Annual Work and Financial Plan ------48
ANNEXES:
1. Organizational Structure ------51 1a. CO 1b. PO 1c-1c1. M & E Contractor 1d. SUSIMO 1e. Infrastructure Contractor
2. Pictures ------57
3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------59
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Community-Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP) revolutionized forest development and rehabilitation efforts of the government when it was institutionalized in 1995 by virtue of Executive Order No. 263.
Before the adoption of the CBFM approach, the sole motivating factor of contract reforestation awardees was primarily financial gains. With the implementation of the Forestry Sector Project (FSP) using CBFM as its main strategy to rehabilitate the mangrove ecosystem, it empowered beneficiary communities economically, socially, technically and politically while transforming them into environmentally responsible managers. The tenurial right to develop subproject sites alongside the various inputs from the Subproject deepened their commitment to collaborate with other stakeholders in the implementation of these subprojects.
The Capalonga Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject is within the proclaimed Mangrove Forest Reserve in Capalonga, Camarines Norte and covers six barangays: Alayao, Mataque, San Isidro, Poblacion, Camagsaan and Calabaca.
Massive conversion of mangrove forests into fishponds and resettlement area; widespread cutting of mangrove species for fuel wood and charcoal production severely degraded the Mangrove Forest Reserve and thus had to be rehabilitated.
Lapses in community organizing activities were compensated by those of the comprehensive site development with all of the targeted 933 hectares fully accomplished with a weighted average survival rate of 89%. The People’s Organization, Capalonga Mangrove Development Association, Inc. (CAMADA) has a track record for good performance with its project cited as the Best Mangrove Project for Luzon.
Involvement in CSD activities created employment for 157 members of the organization as well as 31 who are non-members for a total of 148,990 man days while the Infrastructure Component provided jobs to some 120 persons from the six barangays equivalent to 9,480 man days. On the other hand, 126 members were employed in livelihood projects.
Cumulative increase of income per annum of household for all six barangays for their involvement in CSD and other project activities went up from a total average of PHP111, 000.00 (before project implementation) to PHP175,000.00 or an increase of 58.01% during implementation. This positive development was translated into capability to acquire houses and lots,
i motorboats, appliances and furniture and the capability to provide education to their children.
In terms of infrastructure, six multi purpose drying yards, one for each barangay, were awarded to the PO to support their livelihood projects.
Other benefits include a total of 24 trainings on various subjects ranging from improvement of management capabilities to technical ones such as crab fattening and seaweed production, post harvest as well as other vital trainings to empower the members like paralegal orientation, preparation of project proposals, among others.
ii SUBPROJECT COMPLETION REPORT
of
CAPALONGA MANGROVE REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT
Forestry Sector Project Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135
I. Subproject Description
The Capalonga Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject site is within the proclaimed Mangrove Forest Reserve in Capalonga, Camarines Norte, located at 1417’19.68” to 1421’02” north latitude and 12224’23.28” to 12231’57.77” east longitude. It covers the mangrove dependent communities of Barangays Alayao, Mataque, San isidro, Poblacion, Camagsaan, and Calabaca.
The six barangays are accessible through various means. Barangay Calabaca, the farthest and largest barangay is 12 kilometers away from the town proper and is accessible through a public utility jeep. Barangay Camagsaan can be reached through a 30-minute hike from Capalonga town proper using the 4-km feeder road. Barangay San Isidro on the other hand, is just a twenty minute-boat ride through Alayao bay while Barangay Mataque is located along the provincial road five kilometers from Barangay Poblacion.
Presidential Proclamation No. 2152 issued on December 29, 1981 officially proclaimed the Capalonga Mangrove Forest Reserve. However, it continued its degradation due to massive conversion of mangroves into fishponds and resettlement area; indiscriminate cutting of mangrove species for fuel wood and charcoal making. This prompted the implementation of the Subproject to save and enrich the remaining mangrove resources within the area.
1. Purpose/Objectives
A) Original (at the time of appraisal)
The Subproject aims to develop the 933 hectares of mangrove swamp, tidal flats and denuded coralline areas in remote coastal barangays of
1 Alayao, Mataque, San Isidro, Poblacion, Camagsaan and Calabaca. Its specific objectives are the following:
a. To rehabilitate and develop the 325 hectares mudflat and tidal flats through reforestation;
b. To protect the remaining mangrove forest by strengthening and empowering the community through community organizing, training, and information and education programs;
c. To develop and provide sustainable livelihood opportunities to the organized communities;
d. To provide for a long-term sustainable development of the entire subproject area through an appropriate Community Based Forest Management Agreement or any other legal means.
e. Modification
Not applicable.
2. Subproject Scope and Dimension
A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope & Dimensions
a.1. Please check: There has been ( [] revision and/or modification or [ ] no revision and/or modification) of the Subproject scope and dimensions.
a.2. If “revision and/or modification”, please complete the Table.
ITEM Original Scope and Revised/Modified Dimensions (At the time (Actual) of appraisal/Planned) 1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM 1 A. CO Year 1 Nov. 2000 - Mar. 2003 Nov. 2000 - Mar. 2003 Year 2 933 hectares Extended for 6 months Leveling-off, updating Leveling-off, of socio-economic updating of socio- profile, community economic profile, orientation, briefing, community dialogue & meetings orientation, Film showing, briefing, dialogue & house to meetings
2 House visit, Film showing, community activities house to PO meetings House visit, & workshops community activities PO Officers/ PO meetings BOT meeting & workshops QCP/Quarterly PO Officers/ CSD Planning BOT meeting Workshops QCP/Quarterly Preparation of CSD CSD Planning plan, CCSD-related Workshops trainings/workshops Preparation of CSD Assistance/guidance plan, CCSD-related in CSD operations trainings/workshops Assistance & super- Assistance/guidance vision of participatory in CSD operations implementation of Assistance & super- CSD,conflict vision of resolution, participatory cooperative implementation of operations & mgmt. CSD, Strategic Planning & conflict resolution, Management cooperative Financial Management operations & mgmt. Installation Strategic Planning & Accounting & Management Bookkeeping Financial Parliamentary Management Procedure & Installation Meeting Management Accounting & Nursery Bookkeeping Establishment Parliamentary & Mgmt Procedure & Planning, Meeting Implementation, Management Monitoring & Nursery Evaluation Establishment Assistance in & Mgmt feasibility study Planning, preparation Implementation, Assistance in the Monitoring & actual implementation Evaluation of livelihood projects Assistance in Continuation of feasibility study planned activities preparation
3 Assistance in the actual implementation of livelihood projects Continuation of planned activities B. CSD 1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL a. Infrastructure b. Trail and footpath 2. VEGETATIVE MEASURES2 a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove d.3.1DirectPlanting(Bacauan) 325 ha. 325 ha. d.3.2 Nipa Plantation 222 ha. 222 ha. d.3.3 Enrichment Planting 386 ha. 386 ha. d.4. Plantation Sp. e. Timber Stand Improvement 3. INVENTORY RESIDUAL FOREST NA 4. INCOME ENHANCEMENT PROJECT NA
5. INFRASTRUCTURE 3 units a. Bunkhouse/Office 1 unit 3 units b. Look out tower 3 units 1 unit c. SUSIMO Office 1 unit
C. INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENT
1. Drying yard 6 units
0.30x15x28m (Alayao)
1.00x15x30m (Calabaca)
0.30x15x28m (Camagsaan) 0.30x15x28m (Catioan) 0.30x15x28m (Mataque) 0.30x15x28m (San Isidro) D. MONITORING & EVALUATION Year 1 Physical Component: March – June, 2003 Area covered: 933 ha.
Verification of boundaries,
4 monuments and block corners or posts at the CSD area Seedling production inventory analysis Plantation perimeter survey and mapping Height and diameter measurements and assessment of over- all quality/health plantations Inspection of physical infrastructure
Institutional Component:
Assess organizational, financial and Management capability of the POs Assess capability of the PO to sustain rehabilitation and forest protection work Assess financial viability of the PO and capability to sustain livelihood initiatives
Identify immediate & Potential socio- economic benefits of the project. Identify verifiable evidences that would indicate future environmental impacts of the project 2. SUSIMO Equipment provided to the Office3 3 Boats w/ motor engines 3 Motorcycles 1 Power Generator
5 1 Computer software w/ printer 1 UPS 500 VA 1 GIS software (Maptitude) 2 GPS 1 Base Radio Transceiver 2 Handheld Radio Transceiver 2 Forester’s transits 1 Manual Typewriter 2 Cameras 6 Units Brunton Compass
2 Steel Cabinets
2 Units Steel/Nylon
Tape/Chain
2 Diameter Tapes
1 Tape recorder
1 Planimeter
4 Units Abney Hand
Level
1 Rain Gauge
3 Binoculars
2 Calculators
1 Lettering Set
7 Desks and chairs
6 Office Tables 1 Dining table 1 Knapsack 1 Whiteboard 3 Surveying Tape 2 Staplers 1 Puncher 2 Airpots 1 Computer Table Researches conducted None
4 Trainings attended by SUSIMO 1. Orientation Course on
6 SUSIMO Staff of Mangrove Sub- projects 2. Enhanced Forest Management Through GIS & GPS 3. FSP Reorientation Course 4. FSP Phase Out/Phase In Planning Workshop Others 1. Office 1 unit Office building 2. Staff 8 personnel 1 Please refer to Table 1 for the details on trainings attended by the PO 2 Please refer to Table 2 for the subproject performance in terms of area planted 3 Table 3 shows the details of the equipment provided to the SUSIMO 4 Table 4 shows the details of the trainings attended by the SUSIMO
B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of scope and Dimensions
b.1. Where there has been “revision/modification” of the Subproject scope and dimensions.
Please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.
Revision of the superior plan (appraisal) Revision of the supply-and-demand estimate Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost Substantial revision of design due to the unpredictable physical condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil condition, etc.) Natural disaster/bad weather Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.) Availability of funds (e.g. lack of funds, use of contingency, fluctuation of the exchange rate, etc.) Technical problems Procurement problems Performance of contractor/supplier Performance of consultant Change in construction period Others
7 b.2. Detailed statement of reasons (with background)
b.2.1 Revision of the superior plan (appraisal)
On Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
The PO combined the budget intended for three bunkhouses supposed to use light and locally-sourced materials and decided to just build one unit using concrete materials. They considered the durability of concrete materials for the bunkhouse that would also serve as PO office apart from workers’ quarters. This revision brought additional funding to the CSD Work and Financial Plan (WFP).
On Infrastructure Component
The assessment conducted by JBIC counterpart together with TA Team revealed the need of the six communities for drying yards inasmuch as their main source of livelihood income are from dried fish and dried sea weeds production. Made from concrete and durable materials, the drying yards will help the communities in improving the quality and quantity of their livelihood produce. The yards can also be utilized for other activities within the community like mass assembly meetings and other community gatherings.
C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector(s)
c.1. (Sub) Sector(s) to which the Subproject belongs
Electric power and Gas Telecommunication Social services (Multipurpose) Dams Telecommunications Water supply Power Plants Broadcasting Sewerage Transmission lines Education Distribution Systems Irrigation and Flood control Health Gas Irrigation Tourism Others Flood control Others Transportation Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Roads Agriculture and Forestry Bridges Fisheries Railways Airport Mining and Manufacturing Ports Mining Marine Transportation Manufacturing Others
8 c.2. Original (At the time of appraisal/Planned)
Item Description 1. Allowance of Land Tenure Right The area to be developed, covering a total of (Community-Based Forest 933 hectares, shall be awarded to the POs Management Agreement) through the issuance of a Community-Based Forest Management Agreement (CBFMA). In addition, an approximate area of 900 hectares of second growth mangrove forest will also be included as part of the CBFMA area to be granted to the community.
2. Community Organization The People’s Organization in the Subproject shall be organized and empowered to become effective managers of the Subproject through community organizing (CO) activities, to be undertaken for two years by a capable and experienced NGO.
3. Establishment of livelihood Livelihood development plans were proposed activities which could have high probability of success if implemented in the Subproject. Potential livelihood projects include seaweed culture, mud crab fattening, and other options such as fishing and grouper culture. Once implemented, these income-generating projects are expected to benefit the community in terms of providing income and employment.
4. Development of infrastructure Infrastructure development shall be undertaken in the Subproject to complement/support chosen livelihood projects of the community. When approved by the JBIC , proposals would be prepared for the implementation of the needed infrastructure.
c.3. Present situation and outlook for the future
Item Description 1. CBFMA area With the issuance of CBFMA on June 4, 2003 covering an area of 1,800 hectares which include the established plantation and existing second growth forest, tenure over the developed area is assured. The POs are expected to abide by the provisions of the CBFMA, CRMF, and AWP
9 including the forest protection plan.
At present, the established plantation is protected and maintained. The residual forest is being protected through continues patrolling activities of the PO. The commitment to protect the plantation has led to the apprehension and filing of cases against the offenders.
With the restoration of mangrove forests, it is expected that the diversity of marine ecosystem in the area will be improved and yield of fish catch will increase. This situation will remain for as long as the community will continue to protect and sustainably manage the subproject.
2. Organized PO/community Through the community organizing and strengthening activities conducted in the Subproject, the POs are now more capable to implement and manage the project on a sustainable basis.
At present, the PO is more active and aggressive as compared before. They are not relying heavily on the SUSIMO regarding the technical and management concerns in the course of pursuing their goals related to CBFM. With this trend of direction, it is expected that a self-sustaining community organization will be developed focusing mainly on improved and well- balance mangrove forest and community ecosystem.
3. Livelihood Project5 The PO has initiated aqua-silviculture practices as one of the income-generating projects in the area. A five-hectare fishpond was improved by planting mangrove species while maintaining its dikes to contain high value aqua-marine products such as crabs and shrimps that grow under the pneumatophores of mangrove species. With the improved technical capability of the POs, it is expected that increase volume of mud crab will be harvested.
10
The PO has also implemented a Potable Water System in the area which is beneficial to the community. It addressed the basic necessity of the community while providing another source of income for the PO. There has been no problem with regard to collection of bills from the recipients.
With the existing income generating projects of PO sourced out from their savings out of their CSD contract, socio-economic benefits of the Subproject beneficiaries and participants is assured.
4. Infrastructure The construction of six units of drying yard was awarded to the PO to support the livelihood activities of the community and provide better public service as well. The infrastructure has already been turned-over to the Municipality of Capalonga to ensure effective maintenance.
5Please refer to Table 5 for the livelihood projects being implemented by the PO.
II. Subproject Implementation
1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject
Function in the Name of Organization Reasons for Subproject (1) Original (2) Change Implementation Changed 1. NGO for SMP N / A - 2. AO for CO Countryside Multiline - Cooperative Inc. (CMC) 3. AP N / A - 4. PO for CSD Capalonga Mangrove - Development Association, Inc. (CAMADA) 5. M&E Contractor - Institutional Paniman Foundation for - Environmental Research and Development, Inc. (PANFERD)
- Physical Wellspring Management Corp. -
11 (WMC)
6. Contractor for Capalonga Mangrove - Infra Component Development Association, Inc. (CAMADA)
Please state:
1.1 Reasons for the change
No changes have been made from the original plan with regard to the organizations implementing the subproject.
1.2 Problems arising, counter measures adopted and results
On Community Organizing (CO)
It was observed that the CO contractor was performing slowly especially during their first year of community organizing. Through the SUSIMO, remedial activities in community organizing were undertaken while resolving problems and issues faced by the CO contractor. Fortunately, the SUSIMO was able to catch up with the backlogs in CO activities.
On Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
Initially, the CSD operation was affected by rampant illegal cutting of mangroves in the community. Aside from physical damage to the newly established plantation, intimidations were also common between the two camps: illegal poachers and the community participants. Through persuasive approach, the offenders who were also residents in the community were encouraged to join the project particularly CSD operation rather than engage in illegal activities. In the end, these people were recruited as members of the PO.
1.3 The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for the implementation of the Subproject is ( attached or not available).
Organizational Charts for CO, CSD, M&E for Institutional Validation, M&E for Biophysical Validation and Infrastructure component are attached as Annex 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d and 1e, respectively.
12 1.4 If the organizational chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state the reason.
2. Implementation Period
A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period
Please fill in the following blanks with actual period for each item.
ITEM ORIGINAL SCHEDULE ACTUAL PERIOD
1. Contract of NGO for SMP N / A N/A 2. Contract of AO for CO Nov. 29, 2000-Nov. 29, 2002 Nov. 29, 2000-March. 2003 3. Contract of PO for CSD Dec. 22, 2000-Dec. 22, 2003 Dec 22, 2000-Jun. 30, 2003 4. Contract of NGO for M&E Mar. 25, 2003-Jun. 30, 2003 Mar. 25, 2003-Jun. 30, 2003 5. Contract of Infrastructure Mar. 18, 2003-Jun. 30, 2003 Mar. 18, 2003- Jun. 30,2003 Component Completion Dec. 31, 2003 June 30, 2003 (completion of Subproject) Please refer to Table 6 for the subproject status report.
Notes: Completion of the Subproject was defined as ( [ ] completion ceremony or [ ] final disbursement or [ ]other than the above).
The completion date was scheduled on December 31, 2003 (at the time of appraisal) and is indicated (thus ) in the above Table.
B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion
b.1. In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.
Change in scope/dimensions Natural disaster/ Bad weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.) Shortage of funds/Fluctuation of the exchange rate Problems in procurement Inflation Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.)
13 Legislative matters Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems Performance of contractor/supplier Performance of consultant Others
B.2. Reasons and background for delay or early completion
b.2.1 Performance of Contractor
On Community Organizing (CO)
The implementation of the Subproject CO activities was delayed since the contractor was observed to be slow in discharging terms of condition of their Quarterly Commitment Plan (QCP). Many activities in CO were behind schedule especially in the first year of operation mainly because of lack of competent technical staff of the AO at the site. It was also affected by the 2001 barangay election when it was difficult to encourage the PO to participate in CO activities as some members were involved in election activities. Another reason was the simultaneous conduct of CSD work that affected the conduct of CO activities. These circumstances led to the accumulation of backlogs by the AO.
b.2.2 Others (revision of contract duration)
On Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
The early completion of the Subproject was made in accordance with the directive from DENR management advising the mangrove subprojects to complete CSD activities by June 2003 to provide ample time in the completion of disbursement commitments to JBIC.
C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay
c.1 Performance of Contractor
On Community Organizing
The SUSIMO advised the AO to strengthen their CO staff by hiring competent personnel who will conduct CO works. The SUSIMO also made up for the under performance in CO activities by doing the activities itself.
14 Since the activities of the contracted AO were considered almost dormant during the first year of operation, extension of the contract of the AO for another six (6) months period was effected to cope with the unaccomplished CO activities..2 Others (revision of contract duration)
On Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
With the change in the duration of CSD activities, the SUSIMO correspondingly revised the contract of the PO such that all activities scheduled to be accomplished from July to December 2003 were moved to January until June 2003.
3. Subproject Cost
A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by Component)
Original Cost Actual Item (based on contract) Expenditures (in M pesos) (in M pesos)
Community Organizing 1.675000 1.628189
Comprehensive Site 8.413000 9.439639 Development (CSD)
M and E 0.805589 0.805589
Infrastructure 3.496317 3.496317
Subproject Site 1.291584 1.291584 Management Office (SUSIMO) TOTAL 15.681490 16.661318 Please refer to Tables 7, 8, 9 & 10 for the details of CO, CSD and M&E. The Infra project with its corresponding cost is also attached as Table 10.
B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure
b.1. If there is any difference between Table a.1 and Table a.2 in Paragraph a, please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.
15 Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural disaster/Bad weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.) Increase or decrease arising from a change in construction period Increase or decrease arising from inflation Increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the exchange rate Increase or decrease arising from a change in the scope/work volume of the subproject. Decrease arising from keen competition in tender Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems Others b.2. Description of the detailed reason(s) and background b.2.1 Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural disaster/bad weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)
On Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) There are portions of the Subproject that are usually damaged by flood and strong waves during typhoon season. This entailed considerable amount of maintenance and protection cost (i. e. replanting and fencing) on the part of the PO. They either restored and replaced the damaged area.. b.2.2 Others, Forfeited Amounts in Billings
On Community Organizing Although the AO had completed the CO activities stipulated in their contract, there were lapses on the part of the contractor regarding the submission of appropriate documents as proof for billings like minutes of meetings/conferences and documentation of various CO works. These requirements have corresponding amount on the CO’s QCP that in turn were deducted from their billings and were treated as unrecoverable on the part of the contracting agency. This, despite the DENR’s effort to encourage the contractor to submit all the required documents in proper order. Action taken in Case of Cost Overrun and Results
The PO through the SUSIMO requested additional funds in the form of Contingency Fund to compensate the cost of damages brought about by typhoons and floods. The CSD contract was revised with the inclusion of said contingency fund in the WFP which constitutes 10% of total contract cost. With this, the PO
16 was able to accomplish the required physical target and to attain the desirable survival rate that is above 80%.
C. Comparison of Original Estimated Expenditure and Actual Expenditure (by Year) (in M Pesos)
Original Cost Actual Expenditures (based on appraisal) (in M pesos) Calendar (in M pesos) Year
2001 5.462500 5.369725 2002 4.225364 5.218634 2003 5.993626 6.072959
TOTAL 15.681490 16.661318 Please refer to Table 11 for the details of the Annual Work and Financial Plan.
4. Comments on Performance of Assisting Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), Peoples Organizations (POs), M&E and Infrastructure contractors. Please describe the performance of each organization after checking the item(s) in the relevant lists on which you have any comment.
A. Performance of Assisting Organizations & Assisting Professionals (if any) Peoples Organizations, M&E and Infrastructure contractors
a.1. Overall performance Design Contract administration Construction supervision Expertise Staff qualifications Coordinating ability Compliance with Contracts Performance related to any other than the Subproject scope, if any. Others
a.2 Description (in detail)
1. Assisting Organization
Staff Qualification & Contract Compliance
The CO staff deployed at the site were not technically competent to conduct CO works. They can only be given fair ratings when it comes to performance of their activities. Despite these, the assisting organization was able to complete
17 all their activities and other provisions as stipulated in the approved contract and quarterly commitment plan.
People’s Organization
Over-all performance
The over-all performance of the PO can be considered as very satisfactory in terms of delivery and discharge of their tasks and responsibilities. The accomplished contracted area of 933 hectares had a weighted average survival rate of 89.00% for the established plantation. Moreover, their being a consistent recipient of the Best Mangrove Project for Luzon recognition is proof of their satisfactory performance.
Others
The organization may be young, but the PO has shown maturity and considerable degree of autonomy in terms of management. They exercised more self-governance and required minimum supervision from the SUSIMO.
2. M&E Contractor
a. Over-all performance and staff qualification
The SUSIMO assisted the contractors for both physical and institutional validation requirements of the Monitoring and Evaluation. Both contractors have satisfactorily performed and completed all the activities in accordance with the established standards and conditions.
3. Infra Contractor
a. Over-all performance
The PO was able to come up with the recognized engineering standards set in constructing drying yards, a labor-intensive undertaking. These were all turned over to the local government of Capalonga – a clear indication of a satisfying performance of the contractor.
18 5. Other matters relating to Subproject Implementation
Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measure and results in (B) below.
A. Technical Financial Institutional Economic Social/Distributional Others
B. Description
Description Comment Measure Result A. Technical CO teachings were not The SUSIMO Able to finish fully internalized by judiciously target in CSD PO members because exercised time and implemented of intervening management and the activities in activities in CSD prioritized CO CO. component. CSD and CSD activities diverted the activities. PO attention on CO activities. High mortality rate of As suggested by Directly planted nipa seedlings raised the SUSIMO, Nipa performed in nursery. the PO shifted better than the to direct planting nursery raised. instead of raising The PO was able nipa seedling in to realize a more the nursery. cost- effective measure in planting nipa spp.
Staking activity was The fund It was observed observed to be a intended for that fencing of costly undertaking and staking activity newly esta- less effective in was added to blished planta- protecting the newly fencing of the tion is more established mangrove plantation. effective in (Bakauan) plantation. protecting the plantation from all kinds of destruction. B. Others There was rampant PO members Illegal poaching illegal collection of were enjoined to activities were mangrove timber and protect the minimized and non-timber products remaining illegal collectors
19 occurring within and mangrove were outside the Subproject forests in the apprehended and periphery. area by charged in court. deputizing them as forest law enforcers.
III. Action Taken by the AOs, APs and POs relating to Recommendation(s)
1. Recommendation(s) made by SUSIMO
SUSIMO check: This article is ( applicable. The recommendations are given in Annex – I herewith or not applicable. There has been no recommendation with regard to the Subproject).
RECOMMENDATION ACTION TAKEN RESULTS/REMARKS FROM THE SUSIMO By the AO By the PO The AO should include in Facilitated a The PO actively Said strategy was their QCP the conduct of workshop and supported and successfully High School Quiz consultation in participated in undertaken and was Contest, Poster Making coordination said activities. observed to be an contest, T-shirt printing with the effective tool in and distribution as part SUSIMO and disseminating of IEC and Youth PO to intensify information about the Formation strategies. IEC and Youth importance of Formation mangrove forests and activities. coastal environment to human lives. Focus on the youth is meritorious inasmuch as they will be the future stakeholders of mangrove forest. The PO should locate Supervised and Conducted The PO was able to other areas adjacent to assisted the survey to look replace the lost and the project site in order PO in the for new areas damaged areas and to compensate for the search for and immediately consequently attained portion damaged by other areas conducted an extremely high typhoons and strong for plantation survival rate. waves. development as establishment replacement activity. for the damaged plantation.
20 If possible, award the Assisted the Prepared the The PO was able to contract of construction PO in the necessary secure the contract of Subproject prepara-tion of documents for the construction of infrastructure to the PO, necessary necessary for drying yards and wherever and whenever requirements securing the successfully completed they are capable. in contract contract. said infrastructure. awarding. Facilitated the These were turned construction of over to the Local the multi Government of purpose drying Capalonga. yards.
IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities
1. Present Condition of Facilities
A. Please check: This article is (applicable due to problem(s) or not applicable. No particular problem has occurred since the initial operation started). If there have been any problems, please check the relevant space in the Table.
For the SUSIMO Item Status Initial Maintenance Manageme Others Operation nt
1. SUSIMO Serviceable building 2. Motorboats Serviceable
3. Global One unit
Positioning serviceable,
System the other
Unit
returned to
NFDO for
repair 4. Computer/printer Serviceable 5. Power Serviceable Generator 6. Base Radio Serviceable Transceiver 7. Handheld Serviceable 8. Forester Serviceable Transit 9. Typewriter Serviceable 10. Camera Serviceable 11. Brunton Serviceable Compass
21 12. Steel Cabinet Serviceable 13. Steel Tape/ Serviceable Chain 14. Diameter Serviceable Tape 15. Tape Serviceable Recorder 16. Binocular Serviceable 17. Calculator Serviceable 18. Lettering Set Serviceable 19. Desk/Chairs Serviceable 20. Office Table Serviceable 21. Dining Table Serviceable 22. Knapsack Serviceable 23. White board Serviceable 24. Computer Serviceable table 25. Motorcycles Serviceable
For the PO Item Status Initial Maintenance Management Others Operation 1. Bunkhouse/Office Serviceable 2. Computer set/printer Serviceable 3. Camera Serviceable 4. Motorboat Damaged 5. Steel Cabinet Serviceable 6. Sofa set Serviceable 7. Chairs Serviceable 8. Typewriter Serviceable 9. Kitchen utensils Serviceable 10. Motorcycle Serviceable 11. Refrigerator Serviceable
B. Please check: The Problem(s) has arisen owing to the following reason(s). Technical Financial Institutional Economic Social/Distributional Others, Quality and Serviceability
C. Description (in detail)
Others, Quality and Serviceability
For the SUSIMO: . Global Positioning System (GPS)- The SUSIMO has been using the GPS in surveying and measuring of actual area established in the
22 Subproject. The instrument however got damaged during a field work. The GPS was returned to the NFDO for repair. . Computer/printer - The computer being used by the SUSIMO had a hard disc failure. The repair and maintenance of said equipment have been charged to the SUSIMO maintenance and operating expenses. . Motorboat – Currently used to monitor the Subproject and surveillance of illegal activities in mangrove areas. No major repair nor damage occurred except for the usual change oil and minor spare parts replacement. . Motorcycles – Change in battery, sprockets, signal lights, spark plugs and other minor parts when damaged or worn out. Presently being used by SUSIMO staff. . Power Generator – Not frequently used because of availability of electricity in the community. Maintained only through change of oil with no major repair conducted. . Office Building – Currently being maintained by SUSIMO staff.
For the PO . Computer/Printer – Currently being used by PO in official business with proper maintenance procedure. . Motorboat – The engine is in good condition but the boat itself is damaged and in need of major repair or replacement. . Motorcycle with sidecar – No major damage but with minor spare part replacement. It is currently being used by the PO in their official transactions. . Bunkhouse – Presently being maintained by the PO.
D. Aspect of utilizing the Subproject facilities
For SUSIMO Item Original Plan Actual Operation 1. SUSIMO Building SUSIMO office/quarter SUSIMO office/quarter of staff of staff
2. Motorboats Conveyance of SUSIMO Motorboats were also to effectively monitor used simultaneously by and supervise the POs in the SUSIMO and PO in their implementation of the implementation of the Subproject in the the Subproject. field.
4. GPS For SUSIMO use in their For SUSIMO use in their surveying activities. surveying activities.
23 5. Computer For SUSIMO use in For SUSIMO use in report preparation. report preparation & project documentation.
6. Power Generator For SUSIMO use Used by SUSIMO during blackout and power interruption. . 7. Base radio For SUSIMO use Used by SUSIMO during transceiver/ handheld field works for relay of radio information.
8. Forester Transit For SUSIMO use. Also used by the PO in the plantation establishment activities.
9. Typewriter For SUSIMO use. Used by the SUSIMO and PO in the preparation of vouchers and documents/ correspondences.
10 . Camera Used by the SUSIMO Used by the SUSIMO for photo documentation. for photo documentation.
11. Tape recorder For SUSIMO use. Used by the SUSIMO in the documentation of important meetings such as those with the LGUS.
12. Planimeter Field instruments Used by SUSIMO staff. 13. Binocular provided intended for The instruments catered 14. Brunton compass SUSIMO use. also to the needs of the 15. Steel Tape/Chain CENRO personnel during 16. Diameter Tape their field work. 17. Abney Hand Level 18. Rain Gauge 19. Binocular
20. Desk and chairs Intended for Used by the SUSIMO 21. Office tables SUSIMO use in office for office operations in 22. Knapsack works. the site. 23. White Board 24. Computer table 25. Calculator
24 For the PO Item Original Plan Actual Operation Computer set/printer (1 set) PO Office use PO Office use Camera (1 unit) For PO use For PO use Motorboat (1 unit) For PO use For PO use Steel Cabinet (1 unit) PO office use PO office use Sofa set (1 set) PO office use PO office use Chairs (5 units) PO office use PO office use Typewriter (1 unit) PO office use PO office use Kitchen utensils (1set) PO office use PO office use Motorcycle PO office use PO office use Refrigerator PO office use PO office use
2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance
A. Name of SUSIMO and PO
a.1. Please give the name of SUSIMO and PO or Body in charge of O/M.
PO Name: Capalonga Mangrove Development Association Inc. (CAMADA)
SUSIMO: Capalonga Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject Site Management Office
a.2. Please check:
The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for O/M of the Subproject facilities is ( [ ]attached or [] not available).
PO and SUSIMO Organization Charts are attached as Annex 1b & 1f, respectively.
a.3. If the organization chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state the reason.
. For the SUSIMO: it is the Administrative Support Unit (ASU) that is directly responsible for the maintenance and management of the Subproject facilities, with close supervision of the Subproject Management Officer (SMO).
. For the PO: there is no committee or body that takes charge of the operation and maintenance of PO facilities. It is the president of the Capalonga Mangrove Development Association, Inc (CAMADA) who is directly responsible for the maintenance
25 and operations of the Subproject facilities, with support from the organization’s secretary and treasurer who also serve as administrative officer.
a.4. Number of staff/workers of the SUSIMO and PO or Body for Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.
. For the SUSIMO: The ASU, is directly responsible for the maintenance and operations of facilities, under the assistance of the SMO.
. For the PO: The president, secretary and treasurer as regular staff of the PO are in charge of operations and maintenance of facilities. In cases where there are facilities that need maintenance or repair, that is the only time where the PO president assigns some of its members for the purpose.
B. Please check and explain the following.
b.1. The number of staff is currently ( []sufficient or insufficient). If “Insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the optimum number of staff and your plan for providing them.
b.2. Average employment period of the present staff
PO : five years SUSIMO : six years
b.3. Availability of training program to promote the vocational ability of the staff, its contents and expected effects.
For the PO : None For the SUSIMO : None
3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure for Operation and Maintenance (by Year)
A. Original Expected Expenditure
For the SUSIMO : Item Maintenance Operation TOTAL Calendar year (PhP) in Million (PhP) in Million 2001 1. SUSIMO Office 0.101700 0.101700
26 2. Vehicles/generator (motorcycle, 0.045000 0.045000 motorboat) 3. Computer & other office equipment/ - fixtures - - SUBTOTAL 0.045000 0.101700 0.146700 2002 1. SUSIMO Office - 0.105363 0.105363
2.Vehicles/generator (motorcycle, 0.060000 0.162171 0.222171 motorboat) 3. Computer & other office equipment/ - - - fixtures SUBTOTAL 0.060000 0.276534 0.327534 2003 1. SUSIMO Office - 0.072052 0.072052 2. Vehicles/generat or (motorcycle, 0.090482 0.172000 0.262482 motorboat) 3. Computer & other office equipment/ - - - fixtures SUBTOTAL 0.090482 0.244052 0.334534 GRAND TOTAL 0.195482 0.613286 0.808768
For the PO: The PO has not been practicing budget planning for operation and maintenance for a particular year. Expenses are only drawn whenever needs arise and depending also on the decisions of the General Assembly and BOTs.
B) Actual and Currently Expected Expenditure
For the SUSIMO Item/ Maintenance Operation Maintenance Operation TOTAL Calendar year (PhP) in (PhP) in (PhP) in (PhP) in Million Million Million Million 2001 1. SUSIMO Office (office 0.041319 0.041319 supplies, rental, communication)
27 2. Vehicles/gen erator 0.009040 0.010517 0.019557 (motorcycle, motorboat) 3. Computer & other office - 0.025429 0.025429 equipment/ fixtures SUBTOTAL 0.009040 0.077265 0.086305 2002 1. SUSIMO Office (office 0.131222 0.131222 supplies, rental, communication) 2.Vehicles/genera tor 0.064460 0.050700 0.115160 (motorcycle, motorboat) 3. Computer & other office 0.080000 0.080000 equipment/ fixtures 4. Others (electric, - 0.002650 0.002650 water bills) SUBTOTAL 0.064460 0.264572 0.329032 2003 1. SUSIMO 0.051533 Office (office 0.051533 supplies, communication) 2.Vehicles/gene- rator(motorcycle 0.080000 0.115195 0.195195 , motorboat) 3. Computer & other office 0.050466 0.050466 equipment SUBTOTAL 0.080000 0.217194 0.297194 GRAND TOTAL 0.153500 0.550805 0.712531 EXPANDED PORTION July –Dec, 2003 1. SUSIMO Office (office 0.038429 0.038429 supplies, communication)
28 2. Vehicles/ generator 0.035994 0.035994 (motorcycle, motorboat) 3. Computer & other office 0.006951 0.006951 equipment TOTAL 0.042945 0.038429 0.081374 Jan - Mar, 2004 1. SUSIMO Office (office 0.025000 0.025000 supplies, communication) 2. Vehicles/ generator 0.020000 0.015000 0.035000 (motorcycle, KIA) 3. Computer & other office - - equipment TOTAL 0.045000 0.015000 0.060000
For the PO: Item/ Maintenance Operation Maintenance Operation TOTAL Calendar year (PhP) in (PhP) in (PhP) in (PhP) in Million Million Million Million 2001 1. PO Office 0.024000 0.024000
2. Computer 0.003000 - 0.003000
3. Freezer/Ref
SUBTOTAL 0.003000 0.024000 0.027000 2002 1. PO Office 0.006000 0.010000 0.016000
2. Computer
3. Freezer/Ref
4. Motorboat 0.002000 0.010000 0.012000 SUBTOTAL 0.008000 0.020000 0.028000 2003 1. PO Office 0.010000 0.002000 0.012000
29
2. Computer 0.005000 0.005000
3. Freezer/Ref 0.005000 0.005000
4. Motorboat 0.010000 0.002000 0.012000 SUBTOTAL 0.010000 0.020000 0.004000 0.034000 GRAND TOTAL 0.021000 0.064000 0.004000 0.089000
Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement or any other improvement purposes.
Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing plan for the same:
O/M funds is very essential for the smooth implementation of the Subproject. Based on the previous experiences in FSP subproject implementation, inadequacy of funds for O/M greatly affected the performance of both the DENR staff involved in the project and the PO. Since the Subproject fund support ended, the O/M component will be drawn from the regular fund of the DENR regional and field offices. As for the PO, the O/M funds will be derived from their savings and revenues from their various livelihood projects or from their CFDF.
4. Maintenance Method
A. Content of Method and Frequency:
The PO has employed its members to maintain their facilities and equipment on regular basis. Likewise, the SUSIMO tapped some members of PO to maintain and repair the motorboats and other subproject facilities. Regular check-up and inventory of all facilities has been carried out by ASU to ensure the long serviceable period of facilities. - On maintenance of computer, it has undergone repair and change of parts, once a month. System tool is being run to check for errors. - For the PO and SUSIMO Office, a caretaker was employed by the PO for the janitorial and security jobs for both offices - motorboat, monthly check of engine and annual - power generator, boat engines are being checked once a month (oil change, remove carbon build-up) - Equipment (steel tape, transit, binoculars, abney hand level, etc) are kept in a storage free of dust and possible corrosion.
30 V. Benefits derived from Subproject
1. Indirect Effects
A. Please choose and check the item(s) which are dealt with this Article by you.
Technological transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects) Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the sector(s) after completion) Income-raising (e.g. income of the residents in the region) Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or the region concerned
B. Please give details for each of the item(s) you checked.
Technological transfer
All technologies pertaining to mangroves were transferred to the members through trainings, hands-on activities and cross-site visits. With these activities, the community has become more aware and capable of protecting and managing the mangrove resources.
Employment creating
Involvement in the Subproject through the CSD and Infrastructure Component activities gave employment to community members while the livelihood projects will help sustain generation of additional income. The multi-purpose drying yards will play a significant role in sustaining the livelihood activities of the community.
- CSD implementation provided labor employment for 157 members and 31 non-members or a total of 148,990 man days. - The Infrastructure Component provided employment to at least 120 persons from the six barangays with an equivalent 9,480 man days. - Some 126 members are directly employed/involved in IGP (Water system, Mud Crab and Micro Lending)
Income raising
There has been significant increase in the income of the residents since the implementation of the project, particularly CSD and livelihood activities.
31 Based on the results of the Monitoring and Evaluation (Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment Final Report) conducted by PanFERD, Inc. Percentage Increase in the Income for each barangay during the course of CSD implementation are as follows:
Barangay Subproject Ave. Income per annum % Before During Increase Camagsaan 15,000.00 30,000.00 100 Poblacion 10,000.00 15,000.00 50 San Isidro 30,000.00 45,000.00 50 Mataque 20,000.00 26,000.00 30 Alayao 18,000.00 23,400.00 30 Calabaca 18,000.00 36,000.00 100 Total/Wt. Ave. 111,000.00 175,000.00 58.01
The following have been observed when the socio-economic status of the residents in the area improved:
a) members were able to purchase their own house and lot; b) members were able to buy own motorboat and carabao; c) others were able to send their children to school; d) members were able to purchase appliances and furniture
32 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The restoration of the once denuded mangrove area of Capalonga is attributed to the concerted efforts of the communities, the PO, the DENR personnel and the NGOs/LGU and their sound and effective strategies that complement each other
Good quality plantations with high survival rate had been achieved despite the shortened period to do CSD work.
The seed towards realization of the project objectives had been successfully planted and necessary inputs applied. However, the growth and vigor of this seed will depend on how it will be maintained.
It is recommended that the CO component of FSP subprojects be discarded in the presence of SUSIMO staff who can undertake CO activities/works better than the contracted NGO. Furthermore, the community has the tendency to put their confidence on the staff of the implementing institution.
It is recommended that proper timing and scheduling of CO and CSD components of a subproject be observed. CO activities are greatly affected whenever there are CSD activities being conducted in the subproject because PO members tend to prioritize CSD over CO activities for financial benefit.
The PO should be further assisted in formulating livelihood policies especially projects involving money lending. A strengthened collection policy should be formulated because of difficulty in collecting back the money lent by the members.
Community key leaders and members should be deputized as forest law enforcers to encourage them to protect mangrove forests. This will minimize if not completely eradicate illegal harvesting of mangrove timber and non-timber products.
The DENR through the SUSIMO in collaboration with other bureaus and attached agencies should conduct at this stage of mangrove revegetation a study of the effect of mangrove rehabilitation on the community and physical/coastal environment. Both the tangible and non-tangible benefits that can be derived from the forest should be determined and the valuation of benefits in qualitative and quantitative manner.
33 Forestry Sector project Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135
Table 3. SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE (SUSIMO) EQUIPMENTS Procured ITEM Specifications Qty Cost (PhP) Date/year procured 1 Motorboat 3 5/5/2002 270,000.00 2 Power generator Engine, gasoline, 1 5/15/2001 44,096.00 GS 280, 3.5 KVA 3 Computer w/ software HP Brio PC Intel 1 5/15/2001 70,850.00 Pentium III 733 mhg 4 Printer Hp Deskjet 1 5/15/2001 5,811.52 model 840 C 5 UPS 500 VA Gamatronic 1 5/15/2001 5,720.00 Compact Model 520VA 6 GIS Software (maptitude) Comb software & 1 5/23/2001 44,460.00 geographic data
7 GPS Global positioning 2 5/23/2001 210,000.00 Promark X
Base Radio Tranciever ICOM Model 1 2/28/2001 8 Handheld Radio Transceiver VHF, FM COM 3 2/28/2001 44,899.92 Model IC-F3GT 9 Foresters transit Surveying 2 11/21/2001 69,680.00 compass, Ushikata, model S-27 10 Manual typewriter Oliveti, 18 1 5/15/2001 8,309.60 carriage 11 Brunton compass Kataoke br., 4 5/15/2001 19,552.00 Model BCD-90 12 Steel/Nylon Tape/Chain Tajima Br. 2 5/15/2001 2,700.00 13 Planimeter OSKK KOIZUMI 1 11/21/2001 7,800.00
14 Abney hand level Model:OSK 4 11/17/2001 9,568.00 17251 15 Rain gauge Digital rainwise 1 5/31/2001 6,300.00 16 Lettering set (Leroy Set) Linemaster 2000 1 6/15/2001 4,992.00 17 Office tables wood 3 11/29/2003 6,000.00 18 Camera Canon Zoom 85 & 2 12/20/2001 18,000.00 65 19 Chairs 4 11/29/2003 3,400.00 20 Steel cabinet 4 drawers 1 3/1/2001 5,100.00 21 Binocular 7X50 Diastone 3 6/15/2001 12,168.00 made in Japan 22 Calculator Casio 12 digits 2 12/1/2001 1,000.00 23 Tape Recorder Sony 1 3/1/2001 2,900.00 24 Knapsack 10 4/5/2001 7,000.00 25 White board 2x3x4 1 4/5/2001 1,400.00 26 Surveying tape 50 m long 3 4/5/2001 6,225.00 27 Rechargeable light 3 12/11/2001 3,600.00 28 Technical pen Staedler 4 9/10/2002 1,409.00 29 Motorcycle 3 30 Gas Stove Standard 1 3/1/2001 2,925.00 TOTAL 895,866.04 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 4. TRAINING ATTENDED BY THE SUSIMO
# OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 1. Orientation Course on Sept. 27-29, SUSIMO Staff for NFDO/TA 5 2000 Mangrove Subproject Site 2. Enhance Forest May 30 - June Management Through GIS NFDO Technical Staffs 2 2001 and GPS 3. FSP Phase out/Phase in NFDO Technical Staffs 5 Oct. 7 - 11, 2002 Planning Workshop
4. Re-orientation seminar on April 15 - 18 NFDO/TA 5 FSP Mangrove Subproject 2002 Implementation Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 5a. Livelihood Project of the PO Name of Livelihood Project : Water System
Implementor : Capalonga Mangrove Development Association Inc. (CAMADA)
No. of Beneficiaries : 20 Household
Amount of investment : PhP 129,795.00
Date of Feasibility Study : none
Date started : July 2002
Status : Existing/On-going
Net Income : Php 6,000/month
CFDF : PhP 587,830.55
Linkages Developed : None yet Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 5b. Livelihood Project of the PO Name of Livelihood Project : Mud Crab Fattening
Implementor : Capalonga MangroveDevelopment AssociationInc.(CAMADA)
No. of Beneficiaries : 29 members
Amount of investment : PhP 286,793.00
Date of Feasibility Study : none
Date started : March-03
Status : Existing/On-going
Net Income : PhP 5,580.00
CFDF : PhP 587,830.55
Linkages Developed : none yet Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 5c. Livelihood Project of the PO Name of Livelihood Project : Micro lending
Implementor : Capalonga Mangrove Development Association Inc.(CAMADA)
No. of Beneficiaries : 80 members
Amount of investment : PhP 171,242.55
Date of Feasibility Study :
Date started : July, 2002
Status : Existing/On-going
Net Income : None yet
CFDF : PhP 587,830.55
Linkages Developed : none yet Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 6. SUBPROJECT STATUS REPORT NAME/LOCATION STATUS OF PROGRESS PROJECT PROJECT COST Region OF THE (O:on going C: Completion) AREA (ha) (Mil peso) SUBPROJECT SMP CO CSD M & E INFRA Capalonga Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject/Brgys. Alayao, Mataque, San Isidro, Region V Poblacion, 933.00 16,661,317.84 C CC C C Camagsaan and Calabaca, Municipality of Capalonga, Camarines Sur TOTAL 933.00 16,661,317.84 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 7. COMMUNITY ORGANIZING COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY UNIT ACTIVITIES TARGET of UNIT COST TOTAL COST (hectare) MEASURE 1. Social Investigation Community 69,975.00 (SI)/Organizing - members Activity/Technical and Administrative Assistance
2. Information and Education - Participants 289,230.00 Campaign
3. Documentation Process 23,325.00
4. Identification of Possible 933.00 ha. - 69,975.00 CBFMA
5. Organizing Activities 592,558.35
6. Community Activities 69,975.00
7. Other Support Activities 513,150.00 (CO Staff Development)
8. Contingency
TOTAL 933.00 1,628,188.35 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 8a. Cost Estimate for Enrichment Planting Per Activity
UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT 1. COLLECTION OF PROPAGULE propagule 417,999.00 1.00 417,999.00 SUB-TOTAL 417,999.00 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Cleaning of debris hectare 386.00 100.00 38,600.00 b. Alignment/Staking/Hauling propagule 321,538.00 0.10 32,153.80 c. Planting propagule 386.00 350.00 135,100.00 SUB-TOTAL 205,853.80 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Clearing/removal of algae/tidal debris hectare 386.00 1,000.00 386,000.00 b. Procurement of tools units 10.00 480.00 4,800.00 e. Patrolworks hectare 386.00 566.58 218,700.00
SUB-TOTAL 609,500.00 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First; Second; and Third Year hectare 386.00 182,722.97
SUB-TOTAL 182,722.97 GRAND TOTAL hectare 386.00 3,668.59 1,416,075.77 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 8b. Cost Estimate for Reforestation Per Activity (Bakauan Direct Planting)
UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT 1. COLLECTION OF PROPAGULE propagule 812,500.00 0.91 741,400.00 SUB-TOTAL 741,400.00 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Cleaning of debris hectare 325.00 577.23 187,600.00 b. Alignment of staking/hauling spot 812,500.00 0.37 296,625.00 c. Planting propagule 812,500.00 0.47 378,450.00 d. Fencing m 5,000.00 20.00 100,000.00
SUB-TOTAL 962,675.00 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Clearing/removal of algae/tidal debris hectare 325.00 3,099.20 1,007,240.00 b. Procurement of tools c. Fencing km 13.18 2,000.34 26,364.53 d. Replanting hectare 325.00 1,600.00 520,000.00 e. Patrol Works hectare 325.00 516.62 167,900.00 SUB-TOTAL 1,721,504.53 5. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First; Second & Third Year 517,870.71
SUB-TOTAL 517,870.71 GRAND TOTAL hectares 325.00 12,133.69 3,943,450.24 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 8c. Cost Estimate for NIPA Plantation Per Activity
UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT 1. NURSERY OPERATION a. Proc. & Handling of seeds sdlg 555,000 1.43 795,810.00 b. Sowing of seeds sdlg 555,000 0.13 74,820.00 c. Maint. Of seedlings sdlg 555,000 0.30 168,220.00 d. Proc. Of tools unit 11 250.00 2,750.00
SUB-TOTAL 1,041,600.00 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Cleaning of debris hectare 222 1,040.00 230,880.00 b. Alignment of staking/hauling spot 555,000 0.60 333,000.00 c. Planting propagule 555,000 0.25 138,750.00
SUB-TOTAL 702,630.00 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Clearing/removal of algae/tidal debris hectare 222 3,300.00 732,600.00 b. Replanting hectare 222 1,000.00 222,000.00 c. Patrol Works hectare 222 442.42 98,216.50 SUB-TOTAL 1,052,816.50 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First; Second & Third Year 382,231.17
SUB-TOTAL 382,231.17 GRAND TOTAL hectares 222 14,321.07 3,179,277.67 8,829,563.81 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 9. Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity Unit Target ACTIVITIES of Unit Cost Total Cost Output Measure Physical Validation Component 1. Verification of Boundaries, UTM monuments 933.00 hectare 25.54 23,833.29 and block corner posts 2. Seedling Production/Inventory Analysis 933.00 hectare 19.92 18,589.97
3. Height and diameter measurement 933.00 hectare 30.65 28,599.95
4. Other activities - e.g. 933.00 hectare 148.16 138,233.10 Inspection of Infrastructures & other support activities (organization of validation team, preparation of needed instrument, equipment and materials, levelling- off meeting with PO, AP, and DENR/SUSIMO, preparation of draft report, summary tables documentation, presentation/discussion of draft report to PO, DENR, LGU and AP, finalization and submission of report) II. Systematic Sampling (10%) 933.00 hectare 408.72 381,332.69
S U B T O T A L 933.00 633.00 590,589.00
Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment 1. Data Collection and preliminary 933.00 hectare 80.65 75,250.00 assessment 2. Formulation of findings and recommen- 933.00 hectare 92.18 86,000.00 dation 3. Other activities (e.g. organization of the 933.00 hectare 57.61 53,750.00 team, leveling-off/meeting with PO ,SUSIMO, integration, preparation, presentation , finalization and submission of report to the DENR, LGU, PO) S U B T O T A L 933.00 230.44 215,000.00 G R A N D T O T A L 933.00 hectare 863.44 805,589.00 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 10. Infrastructure Project Infrastructure Project : Multi-purpose Drying Yard
Location : Barangays Alayao, Mataque, San Isidro, Camagsaan, Catioan, Calabaca Municipality of Capalonga, Camarines Sur. ( 1 unit at each barangay)
Contractor : Capalonga Mangrove Development Association, Inc. (CAMADA)
Contract Cost : PhP 3.496317 M Revised Cost :
Contract Duration : March - June, 2003
Effectivity of Notice to proceed : March 18, 2003
Expected Completion date : June, 2003
Revised Completion date :
Date of MOA with LGU : August 27, 2003
Description of the Infrastructure Project
28m x 15m x 0.01m thick concrete pavement with 10mm diameter reinforcing bars @300mm on center on both directions. The yard is provided with 1.00m x 0.10 m thich gravel pathway in the pheriphery and the pavement rests on 0.20 m thick compacted gravel bedding. There were six (6) units constructed located at six (6) barangays covered by the subproject. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN Planned Actual ACTIVITIES Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. SMP - - - - B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 1,795.28 1,675,000.00 1,745.11 1,628,188.35 1. Old Sites - - - Year 1 - - -Year 2 - - 2. New Sites 1,675,000.00 1,628,188.35 - Year 1 837,500.00 628,075.00 -Year 2 837,500.00 546,419.47 -Year 3 C. CSD 3,115.93 8,413,000.00 3,496.16 9,439,638.91 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 281.79 262,911.75 311.64 290,760.13 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC - - a. Infrastructure - - b. Trails and footpath - - c. Plantation - - c.1. Hedgerows/Firebreaks - - - - 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 8,735.36 8,150,088.25 9,805.87 9,148,878.78 a. Agroforestry - - - - Mango - - Pineapple - - b. Assisted Natural Regeneration - - c. Enrichment Planting - - - - d. Tree Plantation 8,523.13 7,952,079.41 9,151.99 8,538,803.68 d.1. Bamboo (including existing Bamboo plantation) - - - - d.2. Rattan - - - - d.3. Mangrove 8,523.13 7,952,079.41 9,151.99 8,538,803.68 d.3.1. Reforestation (Direct Planting Bakauan 10,326.74 3,356,191.08 12,133.69 3,943,450.24 d.3.2. Enrichment Planting 3,815.80 1,472,900.00 3,668.59 1,416,075.77 d.3.2. NIPA Plantation 14,067.52 3,122,988.33 14,321.07 3,179,277.67 d.4. Plantation Species - - - - e. Timber Stand Improvement - - 4. Inventory Residual Forest - - 5. Income Enhancement Project - - D. Major Infrastructure 3,496,317.37 3,496,317.37 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 863.44 805,589.00 863.44 805,589.00 -Year 1 - - -Year 2 - - - - -Year 3 863.44 805,589.00 863.44 805,589.00
2. SUSIMO 1,291,584.21 1,291,584.21 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 15,681,490.58 16,661,317.84 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN
ACTIVITIES
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. SMP B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 C. CSD 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath c. Plantation c.1. Hedgerows/Firebreaks 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry Mango Pineapple b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo (including existing Bamboo plantation) d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove d.3.1. Reforestation (Direct Planting Bakauan d.3.2. Enrichment Planting d.3.2. NIPA Plantation d.4. Plantation Species e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Major Infrastructure E. Monitoring & Evaluation -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3
2. SUSIMO Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN 2001 2002 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. SMP B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) - 837,500.00 - 628,075.00 837,500.00 546,419.47 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites 837,500.00 628,075.00 837,500.00 546,419.47 - Year 1 933.00 837,500.00 933.00 628,075.00 -Year 2 933.00 837,500.00 933.00 546,419.47 -Year 3 C. CSD 933.00 4,478,300.00 933.00 4,509,221.37 933.00 2,855,600.00 933.00 4,144,036.30 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 933.00 262,911.75 290,760.13 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC - - - - a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath c. Plantation - - - - c.1. Hedgerows/Firebreaks 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 933.00 4,215,388.25 933.00 4,509,221.37 933.00 2,855,600.00 933.00 3,853,276.17 a. Agroforestry Mango Pineapple b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation 933.00 4,017,379.41 933.00 4,206,573.41 933.00 2,855,600.00 933.00 3,545,849.03 d.1. Bamboo (including existing Bamboo plantation) d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove 933.00 4,017,379.41 933.00 4,206,573.41 933.00 2,855,600.00 933.00 3,545,849.03 d.3.1. Reforestation (Direct Planting Bakauan 325.00 2,039,491.08 325.00 1,603,248.18 325.00 795,300.00 325.00 1,839,702.04 d.3.2. Enrichment Planting 386.00 386.00 685,825.57 386.00 1,246,300.00 386.00 624,100.20 d.3.2. NIPA Plantation 222.00 1,977,888.33 222.00 1,917,499.66 222.00 814,000.00 222.00 1,082,046.80 d.4. Plantation Species e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Major Infrastructure E. Monitoring & Evaluation - - - - -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3
2. SUSIMO 146,700.00 232,428.09 532,264.37 528,178.49 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 5,462,500.00 5,369,724.46 4,225,364.37 5,218,634.26 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN 2003 Planned (TOTAL) Actual (TOTAL) ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM - A. SMP - - - - B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) - 453,693.88 1,675,000.00 1,628,188.35 1. Old Sites - - - - Year 1 - - - -Year 2 - - - 2. New Sites - 453,693.88 - 1,675,000.00 1,628,188.35 - Year 1 933.00 837,500.00 933.00 628,075.00 -Year 2 933.00 837,500.00 546,419.47 -Year 3 933.00 453,693.88 C. CSD 933.00 1,079,100.00 933.00 786,381.24 8,413,000.00 9,439,638.91 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 933.00 262,911.75 933.00 290,760.13 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC - - - - a. Infrastructure - b. Trails and footpath - - c. Plantation - - - - c.1. Hedgerows/Firebreaks - - 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 933.00 1,079,100.00 933.00 786,381.24 933.00 8,150,088.25 933.00 9,148,878.78 a. Agroforestry - - Mango - - Pineapple - - b. Assisted Natural Regeneration - - c. Enrichment Planting - - d. Tree Plantation 933.00 1,079,100.00 933.00 786,381.24 933.00 7,952,079.41 933.00 8,538,803.68 d.1. Bamboo (including existing Bamboo plantation) - - d.2. Rattan - - d.3. Mangrove 933.00 1,079,100.00 933.00 786,381.24 933.00 7,952,079.41 933.00 8,538,803.68 d.3.1. Reforestation (Direct Planting Bakauan 325.00 521,400.00 325.00 500,500.03 325.00 3,356,191.08 325.00 3,943,450.24 d.3.2. Enrichment Planting 386.00 226,600.00 386.00 106,150.01 386.00 1,472,900.00 386.00 1,416,075.77 d.3.2. NIPA Plantation 222.00 331,100.00 222.00 179,731.21 222.00 3,122,988.33 222.00 3,179,277.67 d.4. Plantation Species - - e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Major Infrastructure 3,496,317.37 3,496,317.37 - 3,496,317.37 3,496,317.37 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 805,589.00 805,589.00 933.00 805,589.00 933.00 805,589.00 -Year 1 - - -Year 2 - - -Year 3 933.00 805,589.00 933.00 805,589.00 933.00 805,589.00 933.00 805,589.00
2. SUSIMO 612,619.84 530,977.63 1,291,584.21 1,291,584.21 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 5,993,626.21 6,072,959.12 15,681,490.58 16,661,317.84 Annex 1b
Organizational Chart of CAPALONGA MANGROVE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. (People’s Organization)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
PRESIDENT Ramil R. Raviz
SECRETARY TREASURER Lane Caldit Cynthia Fermo
BOARD of TRUSTEES
M & E Organizational Committee Development Committee
CSD Livelihood Committee Committee
INFRA Forest Committee Protection Committee Annex 1a
Organizational Chart of Countryside Multiline Cooperative, Inc. (Community Organizing)
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
PRESIDENT
LIAISON SECRETARY OFFICER
OPERATIONS MANAGER
TREASURER AUDITOR
COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY ORGANIZER ORGANIZER ORGANIZER ORGANIZER Annex 1e
Organizational Chart of CAPALONGA MANGROVE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. (Infrastructure Component)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
PRESIDENT Ramil R. Raviz
SECRETARY TREASURER Lane Caldit Cynthia Fermo
BOARD of TRUSTEES
M & E Organizational Committee Development Committee
CSD Livelihood Committee Committee
INFRA Forest Committee Protection Committee Annex 1c
Organizational Chart of Paniman Foundation for Environmental Research & Development (M&E: Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
PRESIDENT
TREASURER SECRETARY
OPERATIONS MANAGER
TEAM TEAM LEADER LEADER
COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY M & E M & E M & E M & E Annex 1d
Organizational Chart of CAPALONGA MANGROVE REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT (Subproject Site Management Office)
SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICER Ramil F. Gata
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT UNIT Cheryl Cano
COMMUNITY SITE VALIDATION ORGANIZING & DEVELOPMENT & AND BILLING STRENGTHENING MANAGEMENT UNIT UNIT (COSU) UNIT (SDMU) (VBU) Alejandro Maranan Allan S. Manjares Victor Zabala
COSU Staff SDMU Staff VBU Staff Edgardo de Guzman Rudy Fulgueras Rolly Garcia Annex 1c1
Organizational Chart of WELLSPRING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (M&E: Bio-Physical Validation Component)
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
TREASURER CORPORATE
SECRETARY
PRESIDENT
OFFICE MANAGER
PROJECT FINANCE MANAGER MARKETING Completed Drying Yards
Patrolling activities of the PO mem- Plantation Protection and maintenance bers. activities.
Water system — one of the major Swine raising livelihood project of the livelihood of the PO. PO members supported by the micro lending program of the PO. Properly maintained mangrove plantation of the PO.
House visitation of a SUSIMO staff PO assembly meeting. and a PO member.
Watermelon production - livelihood of Copra production - other livelihood of individual PO members supported by individual PO members supported by the micro lending program of the PO. micro lending program. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Capalonga Mangrove Subproject San Isidro Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 S 52 ° 27 ' E 645.47 2-3 S 79 ° 58 ' E 206.70 3-4 N 52 ° 25 ' E 297.80 4-5 S 45 ° 26 ' E 1,351.54 5-6 S 13 ° 31 ' W 477.64 6-7 N 70 ° 5 ' W 423.48 7-8 N 84 ° 5 ' W 974.42 8-9 N 41 ° 53 ' E 675.81 9-10 N 64 ° 54 ' W 418.54 10-11 S 60 ° 37 ' W 638.16 11-12 S 45 ° 53 ' E 226.64 12-13 S 56 ° 15 ' W 97.15 13-14 N 57 ° 3 ' W 133.16 14-15 N 43 ° 8 ' W 486.50 15-16 N 9 ° 31 ' W 364.75 16-17 N 15 ° 6 ' E 198.54 17-1 N 56 ° 11 ' E 505.30 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 31 ' 18 " lat-Y 14 21 ' 25 " TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Capalonga Mangrove Subproject Mataque Parcel 1 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 9 ° 5 ' E 370.67 2-3 N 29 ° 51 ' E 211.64 3-4 N 18 ° 4 ' E 469.14 4-5 N 55 ° 45 ' E 213.01 5-6 N 80 ° 54 ' E 436.51 6-7 S 88 ° 25 ' E 325.72 7-8 S 54 ° 24 ' E 628.35 8-9 S 31 ° 28 ' W 401.47 9-10 S 32 ° 42 ' W 206.81 10-11 N 43 ° 14 ' W 272.26 11-12 S 86 ° 0 ' W 874.20 12-1 S 40 ° 54 ' W 569.76 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 31 ' 53 " lat-Y 14 18 ' 11 " Parcel 2 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 S 50 ° 59 ' E 465.64 2-1 N 50 ° 59 ' W 465.64 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 32 ' 6 " lat-Y 14 18 ' 25 " Parcel 3 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 78 ° 1 ' W 450.21 2-3 N 22 ° 16 ' E 651.73 3-1 S 15 ° 31 ' E 722.91 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 30 ' 58 " lat-Y 14 19 ' 8 " TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Capalonga Mangrove Subproject `` Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 S 89 ° 52 ' W 610.15 2-3 N 56 ° 36 ' E 247.07 3-1 S 71 ° 35 ' E 425.72 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 31 ' 12 " lat-Y 14 19 ' 3 "
Parcel 5 1-2 S 72 ° 50 ' W 511.80 2-1 N 72 ° 50 ' E 511.80 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 31 ' 45 " lat-Y 14 18 ' 38 " TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Capalonga Mangrove Subproject Alayao Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 24 ° 21 ' W 380.17 2-3 N 22 ° 46 ' E 272.41 3-4 N 24 ° 9 ' W 348.15 4-5 N 44 ° 31 ' E 657.88 5-6 N 10 ° 60 ' E 394.54 6-7 N 30 ° 45 ' E 278.83 7-8 N 30 ° 4 ' W 386.23 8-9 N 71 ° 23 ' W 383.80 9-10 N 28 ° 17 ' W 184.71 10-11 N 86 ° 17 ' E 228.60 11-12 S 57 ° 37 ' E 554.35 12-13 S 24 ° 13 ' E 319.26 13-14 S 35 ° 22 ' W 367.17 14-15 S 9 ° 52 ' W 435.37 15-16 S 46 ° 45 ' W 637.58 16-17 S 25 ° 19 ' E 330.77 17-18 S 11 ° 41 ' W 445.54 18-19 S 47 ° 39 ' E 141.96 19-1 S 49 ° 41 ' W 94.79 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 33 ' 8 " lat-Y 14 16 ' 56 " TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Capalonga Mangrove Subproject Calabaca Parcel 1 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 61 ° 6 ' W 105.68 2-3 N 24 ° 31 ' E 306.30 3-4 N 39 ° 3 ' E 298.87 4-5 N 17 ° 48 ' W 247.34 5-6 N 58 ° 38 ' W 311.73 6-7 N 10 ° 36 ' W 465.60 7-8 N 12 ° 8 ' E 575.41 8-9 N 45 ° 56 ' E 380.65 9-10 N 63 ° 59 ' E 587.82 10-11 N 85 ° 57 ' W 314.73 11-12 N 25 ° 21 ' W 302.64 12-13 N 42 ° 25 ' E 304.09 13-14 S 86 ° 28 ' E 232.69 14-15 S 46 ° 29 ' E 522.19 15-16 S 39 ° 11 ' E 555.98 16-17 S 19 ° 56 ' W 404.46 17-18 S 11 ° 31 ' W 405.29 18-19 S 64 ° 7 ' W 522.70 19-20 S 39 ° 57 ' W 381.09 20-21 S 2 ° 56 ' W 300.68 21-22 S 37 ° 27 ' W 486.54 22-1 S 40 ° 9 ' W 305.54 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 24 ' 49 " lat-Y 14 17 ' 20 " Calabaca Parcel2 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 S 19 ° 21 ' W 601.05 2-3 N 52 ° 50 ' E 494.57 3-4 S 39 ° 47 ' E 704.78 4-5 S 48 ° 28 ' E 334.40 5-6 S 33 ° 18 ' W 88.96 6-7 N 39 ° 40 ' W 670.47 7-8 N 31 ° 23 ' W 286.22 8-9 S 56 ° 37 ' W 369.12 9-10 S 56 ° 26 ' W 274.18 10-11 N 2 ° 20 ' W 265.75 11-1 N 32 ° 31 ' E 515.45 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 25 ' 40 " lat-Y 14 18 ' 9 " TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Capalonga Mangrove Subproject
Camagsaan Parcel 1 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 32 ° 16 ' W 334.04 2-3 N 27 ° 25 ' W 1,093.29 3-4 N 83 ° 18 ' E 490.71 4-5 S 0 ° 26 ' W 606.42 5-6 S 54 ° 48 ' E 360.71 6-1 S 10 ° 57 ' W 505.11 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 27 ' 39 " lat-Y 14 18 ' 30 "
Parcel 2 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 11 ° 9 ' W 369.24 2-3 N 0 ° 0 ' W 841.84 3-4 S 0 ° 13 ' W 555.46 4-5 S 6 ° 28 ' E 652.79 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 28 ' 11 " lat-Y 14 18 ' 54 "
Parcel 3 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 13 ° 14 ' W 477.71 2-3 N 17 ° 10 ' E 519.95 3-4 S 77 ° 43 ' E 426.50 4-5 N 53 ° 49 ' E 271.97 5-6 S 16 ° 55 ' E 470.56 9-7 N 28 ° 35 ' E 308.34 7-8 N 57 ° 5 ' E 333.64 8-9 N 25 ° 38 ' E 312.75 9-10 N 3 ° 36 ' E 519.85 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Capalonga Mangrove Subproject
Camagsaan Parcel 1 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 10-11 N 76 ° 6 ' E 402.87 11-12 S 51 ° 15 ' E 1,017.72 12-13 S 61 ° 27 ' W 593.67 13-14 S 59 ° 46 ' W 692.51 14-15 S 62 ° 33 ' W 604.10 15-16 S 55 ° 32 ' W 439.63 16-1 S 76 ° 56 ' W 594.71 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 27 ' 18 " lat-Y 14 19 ' 17 "
Parcel 4 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 54 ° 2 ' E 1,875.05 2-3 N 78 ° 17 ' E 236.44 3-4 N 3 ° 4 ' W 378.25 4-5 S 18 ° 11 ' E 1,050.86 5-1 S 75 ° 35 ' W 2,123.69 Reference long-X 122 ° 28 ' 11 " Corner 1 lat-Y 14 18 ' 58 " TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Capalonga Mangrove Subproject Poblacion Parcel 1 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 21 ° 39 ' E 326.39 2-3 N 41 ° 12 ' W 120.89 3-4 N 48 ° 15 ' W 541.84 4-5 N 50 ° 4 ' W 339.40 5-6 N 33 ° 13 ' W 107.94 6-7 S 44 ° 43 ' W 302.52 7-8 S 50 ° 50 ' W 400.72 8-9 S 59 ° 28 ' E 319.76 9-10 S 22 ° 20 ' E 149.87 10-11 S 60 ° 11 ' E 331.72 11-12 S 31 ° 48 ' E 288.36 12-1 N 75 ° 3 ' E 449.54 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 30 ' 11 " lat-Y 14 19 ' 45 "
Parcel 2 Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 S 87 ° 36 ' W 250.20 2-3 S 54 ° 23 ' W 100.46 3-4 S 40 ° 10 ' E 206.20 4-1 N 41 ° 15 ' E 301.33 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 29 ' 27 " lat-Y 14 18 ' 54 " CSD DISBURSEMENT BY YEAR BY SUB-ACTIVITY (CAMADA) 2001 0.099338769 2002 0.216569587 TARGET AMOUNT PMC W/ PMC TARGET AMOUNT PMC W/ PMC Landuse delineation 933 239,000.00 51,760.13 290,760.13 Nursery Operation 2,142,099.00 212,793.48 2,354,892.48 58,900.00 12,755.95 71,655.95 NIPA Pltn. 1,041,600.00 103,471.26 1,145,071.26 - Proc. & Handling of seeds 795,810.00 79,054.79 874,864.79 Sowing of seeds 74,820.00 7,432.53 82,252.53 Maint. Of seedlings 168,220.00 16,710.77 184,930.77 Proc. Of tools 2,750.00 273.18 3,023.18
REFO (Direct Bakauan) A. Collection of Propagules 682,500.00 67,798.71 750,298.71 31 58,900.00 12,755.95 71,655.95
EP (Bakauan) A. Collection of Propagules 417,999.00 41,523.51 459,522.51
Plantation Estab 1,684,358.80 167,322.13 1,851,680.93 186,800.00 40,455.20 227,255.20 NIPA Pltn. 702,630.00 69,798.40 772,428.40 Cleaning of debris 230,880.00 22,935.33 253,815.33 Alignment/staking/hauling 333,000.00 33,079.81 366,079.81 Planting 138,750.00 13,783.25 152,533.25
REFO (Direct Bakauan) 775,875.00 77,074.47 852,949.47 186,800.00 40,455.20 227,255.20 Cleaning of debris 169,000.00 16,788.25 185,788.25 18,600.00 4,028.19 22,628.19 Alignment/staking/hauling 265,625.00 26,386.86 292,011.86 31,000.00 6,713.66 37,713.66 Planting 341,250.00 33,899.35 375,149.35 37,200.00 8,056.39 45,256.39 Fencing 100,000.00 21,656.96 121,656.96 EP (Bakauan) 205,853.80 20,449.26 226,303.06 - Cleaning of debris 38,600.00 3,834.48 42,434.48 Alignment/staking/hauling 32,153.80 3,194.12 35,347.92 Planting 135,100.00 13,420.67 148,520.67
Maintenance and Protection 2,668,929.03 578,008.86 3,246,937.89 NIPA Pltn. 889,424.50 192,622.30 1,082,046.80 Cleaning of debris 588,300.00 127,407.89 715,707.89 Replanting 222,000.00 48,078.45 270,078.45 Patrolworks 79,124.50 17,135.96 96,260.46 Proc. of tools
REFO (Direct Bakauan) 1,266,504.53 274,286.36 1,540,790.89 Cleaning of debris (2p) 844,740.00 182,944.99 1,027,684.99 Proc. of tools Fencing 26,364.53 5,709.76 32,074.29 Replanting 260,000.00 56,308.09 316,308.09 Patrolworks 135,400.00 29,323.52 164,723.52 EP (Bakauan) 513,000.00 111,100.20 624,100.20 Cleaning of debris (2p) 328,100.00 71,056.48 399,156.48 Proc. of tools 4,800.00 1,039.53 5,839.53 Fencing Replanting Patrolworks 180,100.00 39,004.18 219,104.18
Infrastructure 275,300.00 27,347.96 302,647.96 252,700.00 54,727.13 307,427.13 Bunkhouse 245,300.00 24,367.80 269,667.80 252,700.00 54,727.13 307,427.13 Lookout tower 30,000.00 2,980.16 32,980.16
TOC 4,101,757.80 407,463.57 4,509,221.37 3,406,329.03 737,707.27 4,144,036.30 PMC 407,463.57 737,707.27 TPC 4,509,221.37 4,144,036.30 2003 0.100000056 GRAND TOTAL TARGET AMOUNT PMC W/ PMC TARGET AMOUNT 239,000.00 2,200,999.00 1,041,600.00 795,810.00 74,820.00 168,220.00 2,750.00
- 741,400.00 - - 417,999.00
1,871,158.80 702,630.00 230,880.00 333,000.00 138,750.00
962,675.00 187,600.00 296,625.00 378,450.00 100,000.00 205,853.80 38,600.00 32,153.80 135,100.00
714,892.00 71,489.24 786,381.24 3,383,821.03 163,392.00 16,339.21 179,731.21 1,052,816.50 144,300.00 14,430.01 158,730.01 732,600.00 222,000.00 19,092.00 1,909.20 21,001.20 98,216.50 -
455,000.00 45,500.03 500,500.03 1,721,504.53 162,500.00 16,250.01 178,750.01 1,007,240.00 - 26,364.53 260,000.00 26,000.01 286,000.01 520,000.00 32,500.00 3,250.00 35,750.00 167,900.00 96,500.00 9,650.01 106,150.01 609,500.00 386 57,900.00 5,790.00 63,690.00 386,000.00 4,800.00 - - 38,600.00 3,860.00 42,460.00 218,700.00
528,000.00 498,000.00 30,000.00
714,892.00 71,489.24 786,381.24 8,222,978.83 71,489.24 1,216,660.08 786,381.24 9,439,638.91