DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ukrainian Weekly 1934

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ukrainian Weekly 1934 UKRUHUSupplement to the SVOBODAN , UkrainiaWEEKLn Daily Y •#r— II fjT.|li РиЬВДЙЙ by the junk* Department of tb* -Ukrainian-Hational АмосЬ&ми *r„ n. <HTti І 'іптірмйгШ No. 30. Joriey City, N. J, Friday, Jtdy 27, 1934. П. Y. L. of N. A. ISSUES CALL . LfiVE EABLfc TO PARTICIPATE IN YOUTH WMINIJIlf flWTH MOVEMEW ІГШАВРШГ . By Tare* Sbevcheoko CONGRESS In a previous issue mention was mj.de of Pidkarpat- Every American-Ukrainian youth Love each other, early, children.! ska RUB, the official name for the westernmost section of There're many In tme world to club-, whether it be cultural, social, Ukrainian ethnographic. territories, known also as Pid­ or sport, which intends to take •• .-love— - part in the forthcoming Secohd karpatya. As we learned thenrfittat is the Ukrainian laud. Though not for gate} Luck un- Ukrainian Youth's Congress of which during the heyday of the Austrian-Hungarian bestairchefl America,—which will be held un- Empire was the object of unmitigated Hungarian ^per­ And willing, Meet from up above ... dcr the auspices of .the Ukrainian ІГІІЯІІ)ІІ«Й >1IJ і|Імя"ІІІІ Viiljj(tl ВІИііТіу secution. The Hungarians sought with all means possible . Add during life and strife will be Youth's League of N. A. Septem­ tp denationalize out people; to make them even beHete- ber 1st and 2nd in Mew York City, Yonr one.companion on toe road— at the International Institute, 341 that they were Russians, anything to make them forget Tten and' after.' East 17th Street,—should send its their Ukrainian nationality. To that end they even seized •••• TransUtted by #. Sentenyna, notice of intention of taking part property* belonging to Ukrainians, forcing the latter to • "B a a a your КоЬсдг! in this Congress, in care of emigrate' to America in search) of a decent- livelihood. Stephen' Shumeyko, 67 Boyden This persecution continued right up to the collapse Of Щ'$*.-.Л'. '"W^'iMU^ Ave.-Jiaplewood, ft. J. the Austrian-Hungarian Empire. v At the end of'tie Each club will have the right World War this land was ceded to Czechoslovakia by AROHIPENKO SCULPTURE to be represented by two delegates S*NT- Щ LVIW AS jj&ht. OV who will have voting powers. Be­ virtue of an agreement made- by the .Czechs in J.&17, with r sides the delegates, the League ex­ representatives of the American-Ukrainians who hied ~ і Amxicjui-vttAiinAHs tends a Cordial invitation to all of і come from 'that section of Ukraine. ... £ "' i. • - There. is hardly a museum of out yonng American-Ukrainians, any importance throughout die who care, to attend the Congress This eenturies-old enslavement of Pidkarpatya' rejsultt - world which doss not contain some as guests. They will also have an • ed in.a.most deplorable situation. Many of the Ukrain? examples - of the works of our opportunity to be' neard. ians of that-section lost practically ati contact with the world faibous sculptor and painter, Notices of intention to partici­ Alexander Archipenko. And yet; Ukrainian nation, its ideals and aspirations. j~A. .{pieat : pate in this Congress should be deal-Of blame for this can be laid on the shoulders of- up tor tfifs. time Lviw, the center sent out immediately as. reserva­ of Western Ukraine, did not have tions for luncheon and entertain­ their Ivtagyarized clefgy, which worked hand in handrwith. a single work of his. ment of delegates and guests will the. Magyars in Magyarizing and Russifying our people. ;• Realizing this, a public spirited have to be made within the next Many of this Magyarized clergy can be found even ipre' drive was started by Dr. -Luke couple^of weeks. Also, girt dele­ in America, refusing to acknowledge their Ukrainian na­ Mj^huha .among the ;Ameitcan- gates -esd guests who wish to tionality, talking Hungarian at home, and telling their Ukrainians to, raise funds tS^nir- make -reservations for sleeping ; chase at cost one of Archipenko's over atSthe Institute should send parishioners that they are not Ukrainians—^wheh in піїїмі rrifiWiiilii nftlfllrifdiiiir /His in theft".reservations early. The reality they are—but that they are Russians, Rusky, Igeditation." -This, drive jjoend charge-tor sleeping over will be Ruanaks, or some other equally cohfusing designation. quick; response, and within a com- | seventy-Bye cents to one dollar. Needless to say, this traitorous work reacts most un­ paraUvely ' short tttae sufficient A Splendid program is being favorably upon the Ukrainian national movement for funds were raised; to fchy---thte planned for the Congress, and en­ scttpture. The price paid ft* it, tertainment for the participants in independence. \ •• -• - $Й)І5;Л,-covered ojily the epet, the evenings. Just at present we are witnessing ah unusually ih- carryfeg- cnarges aattlus^liatica. - 4t a #me when our American- terestiftg strife, in Pidkarpatya, One which should serve ': TW? squljiture was sent near the JUkTCitnian youth realizes note as a good example for our youth Here in America. This latter pftrt of Hit iridhth to the- than ever its common thoughts, strife is between the youth and those of the older gen­ ' Ukrainian National ' Musemn in . ideals and ambitions, there is no Li^W, ' fiaaterri Gaiicfa, Western • better oportunity for them of eration who have become Russianized. Uk-ratne, where' Ukralmans and meeting.lUie another front all parts '. The latter recently held a eonvention in Mukachevo, еІЛйг* WiH hav* an oppVirturilt^ of seeing a work of UkraUte's great of the. country, exchanging opin­ Pidkarpatya; the purpose of. which was to dedarfc. that 1 ions, апд. laying plans for the they were Russians, not Ukrainians. son , Alexander Arcl future than is offered by: .the Se­ - This shameful convention aroused our youth of Pid­ cond Ukrainian Youth's Congress of America. karpatya. TJhey-decided to have a convention Of their UiWiMNUkN * BBCOMMBNI own, one which would wipe oil the stain on the tik- ... FOB NATIONAL CHAPfaAW ~ For further information refer to last week's or future issues of rairiiah honor which this traitorous action of the older Ttn Johnstown.Pa. Post aud^tho "Ukrainian Weekly,-'' - and other generatibrt had. left, one which would show before the (Cambria jbiiihty .WBuhittoe,- iiftft^l American-Ukrainian press. whole world the. unity of the Ukrainian people of Pid­ lean Legion,. recently passed .uf^j Ukrainian Youth's League of karpatya with the Ukrainian people from around Kiev nahimotlsfy a. iseoWtioli^ . recom­ - North America and Lviw, and one which would be a demonstration •' mending IT. Woloschuk', a. Ukrain- against their Sethers who had been led astray by. ','Rus- 'iari, for the otecfe of National : Chaplain of the' Aiiericai Legion. eiafl phantasies." '- -_. The' BJbV. WoiosTittlc is at present COMPARES ARCHlPENKO Over 8,000 delegates of the younger generatioh of the ChapHarft of the State bep^rt- WITH JAMES JOYCE Ukrainian youth of. -Pidkarpatya' ' met ih -MuMcievo, < aieni of я Perihsylvaimia, having Recently in LviW a critical an­ where the youth convention was held. There thia .nines Served as State Chapiaiii of the alysis of one of the present-day's of Ukrainian youth representatives .resolvedi.thafc>' І $ 3*44 ^ ^Qr tiirse' eh cceselfes years ' most discussed books; "Ulysses," ' and »NaSienal fhapiatt ^at the by JarheS Joyce, ha* Appeared. Its "Pidkarpatya is our land. s*m# orginJzatioTi for tie year author is Dariarj Vikoriiky. As і "ОпУ right ahd otir truth shall reign over it; 1*32-1083: fie Й «1ao sdlfof of the some -elf our readers have probably "All of Us,'the. intelligentsia, Щ.peasants, the: city JohnatoWh Legiuaitaire; realized themselves, this book is dwellers* the werkers, ail are-Лот our rights in thisi .Йцг one of-the most difficult and baf­ land.. •ЯВМВПУІЯ, 8Щ«Т-.ВДіврі fling to read, not even to speak of CAWS criticising, particularly in the Uk­ r- •.'.'We shall never-giVe up our historical rights?" ,. soamsTMrnov rainian language. - In the Manifesto that they issued they- declared -the ' Among the very, flrst td Se- The authoress of this critical following: to Це (jewfy Built concehtreiion analysis created quite surprise "We. declare an .unceasing war against all our camps hj РоІаЩіігега'иЦаіггІаЧіу when in .'her work she compared These toncehtratfoh camps were the works of James Joyce, an enemies, who hinder our national and cultural progress, Ш up' by Piteudsky fofldwilig the Irish-writer, with the works of and who desire oar national death. aseaesinatWh. Щ, Ш Polish "Ih Pidkarpatya there shall be:—Ulu-аішЛа ^gov­ 5sW Pleretep*' Alexander Archipenko, Ukrainian ; sculptor, showing how they, pa­ ernment, Ukrainian schools, Ukrainian lahguage, Ukreiil- Most al the Ukraimafes who are ralleled in many respects. The con­ iah rigbt arid .Ukrainian might. sent to-tEe, fe/ncentratiott camps clusion she reaches is that, just as 1 % "fiown-nitb the Gzechization of our Ukrainian; peo- are' ftrsf' seift Mi Lviw and rrbm Arohipenko opened hew vistas in them direct- to-"the camd. They sculpture so did James Joyce with Jla! - Down?with the Russifieation of our people! .- come riot <My fftm th6 Jflttainian his .-"Ulysses" in the field of liter­ Q r. ^We; omr-people, our language, our belief, have been, lands under Poland but f гой ature. are, arid always will be Ukrainian і land proper as Well. "*••.'>• ( KRAIMA.N WEEKLY, FRIDAY, JULY 1034. No. 30. poses in Middle and Western Eu­ At first the brotherhoods con­ A SHORT HISTORY OF UKRAINIAN LITERATURE rope where it had flourished the fined themselves to acts of chanty. By BEV. M. KINASH most before, and. the living na­ Soon, however, they realized that •; (A free translation by S. 8.) tional -tongue of -people 'steadily their activities would have to be advanced ur public favor.: extended if they were §0 hope to (J8) Thus, as -we see, under' tie In­ achieve their aims.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fifty Years of the Renewal of the Macedonian Orthodox Church •Fi
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 37 Issue 2 Article 3 3-2017 United Bible Societies and the Macedonian Bible: Fifty Years of the Renewal of the Macedonian Orthodox Church – Ohrid Archbishopric Aco A. Girevski State University in Skopje, Macedonia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Girevski, Aco A. (2017) "United Bible Societies and the Macedonian Bible: Fifty Years of the Renewal of the Macedonian Orthodox Church – Ohrid Archbishopric," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 37 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol37/iss2/3 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED BIBLE SOCIETIES AND THE MACEDONIAN BIBLE Fifty Years of the Renewal of the Macedonian Orthodox Church – Ohrid Archbishopric By Aco A. Girevski Aco Girevski is a professor at St. Clement of Ohrid Faculty of Orthodox Theology, State University in Skopje. His research and pedagogical interests include Macedonian translation of the Bible, church administration, Orthodox agiology, and homiletics. Bible Societies are voluntary societies of various Christian denominations that are locally organized, and mostly of national and sometimes international character. There are several main functions allotted to Bible Societies: a) translation and revision of Biblical texts; b) printing; c) distribution and, d) animation of the Bible usage.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER of Course in Ukraine2
    Integration of Music - Speech - Movement - Dance as a Process of Intercultural Understanding 22nd International Summer Course of Encounter „Orff – Schulwerk“ From Monday, July 29th till Saturday, August 3rd 2019 in Ostrog / Ukraine Theme of the 5 days Seminar “Elemental Music and Dance Education inspired by the musical style and form of the Baroque” The goals of the seminary are the deepening and further development of the principles of holistic and elemental Music and Dance Pedagogy (for schools, music schools and other educational establishments). Introduced and transmitted by international Orff-Schulwerk Experts, this seminary is open for participants (students, teachers, educators, therapists) from all over the world. The official teaching language is English. Since 1996 this project permanently works out successful cooperations between Central and Eastern European countries. Changing themes build the bridge between elemental Music and Dance Education and the Arts. This time the course focuses on the music and dance from Baroque. Art-Teacher with special emphasis to the Orff-Pedagogy will create exciting opportunities to put the sophisticated music of the Baroque in an elemental and holistic context. Demonstrating ways, how music of artistic level can be implemented for an experience-oriented playful way already with small children. Cooperation and support: This international Master Class Course of Encounter 2019 is carried out in cooperation with the Ukrainian Orff Association and the National University of Ostroh Akademy. The course is supported by the Carl Orff Foundation and Studio49 - Orff-Instrumente Builder in Munich. The artistic and organizational team of this course is looking forward to welcome participants from all over the world at this International Orff-Master Class.
    [Show full text]
  • Textbook on HUUC 2018.Pdf
    MINISTRY OF HEALTH CARE OF UKRAINE Kharkiv National Medical University HISTORY OF UKRAINE AND UKRAINIAN CULTURE the textbook for international students by V. Alkov Kharkiv KhNMU 2018 UDC [94:008](477)=111(075.8) A56 Approved by the Academic Council of KhNMU Protocol № 5 of 17.05.2018 Reviewers: T. V. Arzumanova, PhD, associate professor of Kharkiv National University of Construction and Architecture P. V. Yeremieiev, PhD, associate professor of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Alkov V. A56 History of Ukraine and Ukrainian Culture : the textbook for international students. – Kharkiv : KhNMU, 2018. – 146 p. The textbook is intended for the first-year English Medium students of higher educational institutions and a wide range of readers to get substantively acquainted with the complex and centuries-old history and culture of Ukraine. The main attention is drawn to the formation of students’ understanding of historical and cultural processes and regularities inherent for Ukraine in different historical periods. For a better understanding of that, the textbook contains maps and illustrations, as well as original creative questions and tasks aimed at thinking development. UDC [94:008](477)=111(075.8) © Kharkiv National Medical University, 2018 © Alkov V. A., 2018 Contents I Exordium. Ukrainian Lands in Ancient Times 1. General issues 5 2. Primitive society in the lands of modern Ukraine. Greek colonies 7 3. East Slavic Tribes 15 II Princely Era (9th century – 1340-s of 14th century) 1. Kievan Rus as an early feudal state 19 2. Disintegration of Kievan Rus and Galicia-Volhynia Principality 23 3. Development of culture during the Princely Era 26 III Ukrainian Lands under the Power of Poland and Lithuania 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Encode Additional Cyrillic Characters Used in Early Church Slavonic Printed Books
    Proposal to Encode Additional Cyrillic Characters used in Early Church Slavonic Printed Books Aleksandr Andreev* Yuri Shardt Nikita Simmons PONOMAR PROJECT 1 Introduction Church Slavonic (or Church Slavic, ISO 639-2 code cu) is a highly codified, living, literary lan- guage used by the Slavs. Presently, various recensions of Church Slavonic are used by Slavic Or- thodox Churches, such as the Russian Orthodox Church, and by Slavic Byzantine-Rite Catholic Churches as primary or secondary liturgical languages. Historically, the language was used not only for liturgical texts and religious literature but also for secular academic literature, such as grammars, lexicons, and even astronomical treatises, prior to the codification of literary recen- sions of vernacular Slavic languages. Church Slavonic has been wrien in two scripts – Cyrillic and the earlier Glagolitic. is proposal focuses on Church Slavonic texts printed in the Cyrillic alphabet only. In this document, the authors identify nine Cyrillic characters used in early Church Slavonic printed books published between 1500 and 1700. e characters can be classified as being of three types: characters used in historically important literary texts (such as the Bible printed by Fran- cysk Skaryna, the Ostrog Bible printed by Ivan Fedorov, or the Trebnik compiled by Metropolitan Peter Mogila). ese texts are of immense value to academics studying the history of Slavic lan- guages, the Cyrillic printed tradition, and the Byzantine Rite. e second class constitutes char- acters that are in use in liturgical texts published today by the Russian Old Ritualist community. Old Ritualists rejected the linguistic and liturgical reforms carried out in Russia under Patriarch Nikon and his successors (1653-1700) and continue to use liturgical books that imitate the ear- lier printed tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of the Bible, Ronald Press, New York
    Reading 10-1 1 READING 10-1 H.N. Moldenke and A.L. Moldenke. 1952. Plants of the Bible, Ronald Press, New York. Historical Sketch Popular interest in the botany of the Bible dates from very early times. Plants and plant products are referred to in so many hundreds of verses of both the old and new testaments, as well as in the books of the Apocrypha, that it is not at all surprising to fi nd early theologians, divines, and scholars exceedingly interested in them. Theological literature, from its very beginnings, is fi lled with references to and com- ments upon the plants of the Bible and of Biblical lands. There was, of course, a long period of time when no one dared to challenge any of the translations or interpretations of Biblical passages by the leaders of the church then in authority. The time came, however, when questions were asked and various sects or denominations appeared-at fi rst persecuted and suppressed as “heretics”. Translations were questioned and even the canonicity of some of the chapters and of entire books was challenged. There naturally followed heated and often bitter discussions and arguments among scholars and theologians concerning the transla- tion and interpretation of certain Hebrew or Greek words or phrases in the various passages referring to, or thought to refer to, plants or plant products. No attempt has been made by us to review the huge theological literature on this subject, or to list it in our bibliography, primarily because these writers were not botanically trained and their arguments, while in many cases interesting to read, are largely metaphysical, philosophical, moralistic, or philological in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Slavonic Typography in the Unicode Standard
    Chur Slavonic Typography in Unicode Unicode Technical Note #41 Aleksandr Andreev¹ Yuri Shardt Nikita Simmons Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is Church Slavonic? ..................................... 1 1.2 e Unicode Standard ....................................... 7 1.3 Guidelines of is Technical Note ................................ 9 2 Repertoire Identification 10 2.1 Church Slavonic Leers ...................................... 10 2.2 Numerical Symbols ........................................ 19 2.3 Punctuation ............................................ 20 2.4 Diacritical Marks ......................................... 21 2.5 Combining Leers ......................................... 23 2.6 Miscellaneous Symbols and Pictographs ............................. 25 2.7 Ecphonetic Notation ........................................ 28 3 Implementation 29 3.1 Combining Diacritical and Enclosing Marks .......................... 29 3.2 Combining Marks in Isolation .................................. 29 3.3 Multiple Combining Marks .................................... 30 3.4 Combining Marks over Multiple Base Characters ........................ 33 3.5 Palatalization ............................................ 34 3.6 Spacing and Hyphenation ..................................... 35 3.7 Glyph Variants ........................................... 38 3.8 Ligatures .............................................. 41 4 Font Design and Development 43 4.1 Font Design and Distribution ................................... 43 4.2 Character Repertoire
    [Show full text]
  • The Septuagint and the Masoretic Text in the Orthodox Church(Es)* Alexandru Mihăilă**
    The Septuagint and the Masoretic Text in the Orthodox Church(es)* Alexandru Mihăilă** In this article, I intend to survey the reception of versions of the Old Testament in the Orthodox churches, focusing on the Greek, Russian and Romanian Church, respectively. While Western biblical scholars gave precedence to the Hebrew text over the Septuagint, in the Orthodox world one can see a tension in the relationship between the two textual witnesses and sometimes, even recently, there are voices which tend to give the Septuagint total authority in the Church. Orthodox scholars in the field of Old Testament studies usually resort to the Hebrew text, but especially scholars from outside this field tend to promote the Septuagint as the Old Testament of the Orthodox Church. I shall use the argument of authority, which is improper for scientific argumentation, but it suits my research, as I try to understand the confessional positions held within Eastern Orthodoxy. Consequently, if a certain saint, acknowledged as such by a national Orthodox Church or by the entire Eastern Orthodox communion, embraces a particular view on this subject, this bears significantly on the issue. Keywords: Orthodox Church, Bible, Septuagint, Masoretic Text, Synodal Bible. Recent positions of Romanian theologians I begin with an overview of the Romanian Orthodox Church, which I know better. Immediately before and especially in the aftermath of the December Revolution, the future archbishop Bartolomeu Anania worked on an impor- tant biblical project. The result, published in 2001, was a new translation of the Bible, even if Archbishop Anania called it a “revised edition according to the Septuagint”.
    [Show full text]
  • Two East Slavonic Primers: Lvov, 1574 and Moscow, 1637
    TWO EAST SLAVONIC PRIMERS: LVOV, 1574 AND MOSCOW, 1637 CHRISTINE THOMAS CULTURAL life in Russia in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries diflFered from cultural life in Western Europe in two important respects. Works of literature and scholarship were not written in the spoken vernacular (Russian), but in Church Slavonic, and the predominant medium for conveying thought was not the printed book, but the manuscript. Printing, which began late—the first explicitly dated Moscow imprint being that of Ivan Fedorov's Apostol (Acts and Epistles) of 1564—was dominated by Church and State and was reserved in the main for the production of generally large-format liturgical works for use in Orthodox Church services. The first printed and dated East Slavonic primer did not appear until 1574. It was a primer for children learning to read not Ukrainian or Russian, but Church Slavonic, and it was printed not within the State of Muscovy, but in Lvov, then in Poland (but now in the Ukrainian SSR). It is the recent acquisition by the British Library of a copy of this significant and rare work (hitherto known only from a copy at Harvard) that has caused this article to be written (fig. i). During the period 1574 to 1652 in the territory within the frontiers of the present-day Soviet Union some twenty editions of Church Slavonic primers are known to have been printed. Only two came from the Moscow Printing House (printed in 1634 and 1637), the others were printed outside Russia, either in Belorussia or the Ukraine, both then part of Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Clarification in the Encoding Model for Some Cyrillic
    Request for Clarification in the Encoding Model for Some Cyrillic Combining Characters Aleksandr Andreev* Yuri Shardt Nikita Simmons Ponomar Project Slavonic Computing Initiative 1 Introduction Church Slavic (also known as Church Slavonic or Old Slavonic) is a historical literary lan- guage of the Slavs. Presently it is used as a liturgical language by the Russian Orthodox Church, various other local Orthodox Churches, and Byzantine-rite Catholic and Old Ritu- alist communities. As considered in this document, Church Slavic is wrien in the Cyrillic script. is document requests the UTC to clarify the encoding model for Cyrillic as used in typeseing Church Slavic in order to provide for consistency in the encoding of combining Cyrillic leers. 2 Problem Description Church Slavic uses combining (superscript) Cyrillic leers to indicate that a word has been abbreviated in writing, either as a spelling convention (for example, in nomina sacra) or as a space-saving device. Such combining leers have already been encoded in the Unicode standard in the Cyrillic Extended-A and Cyrillic Extended-B blocks. Church Slavic also uses composite combining leers, which consist of either a digraph of two combining leers or a ligature made of two components, both occurring over one base character (in manuscripts, the combining characters may be wrien quite large and may appear to occur over several characters, but this is a stylistic embellishment). e Unicode standard has already encoded one such composite combining leer, U+2DF5 COMBINING CYRILLIC LETTER ES-TE (◌ⷵ ). An example of this character is presented in the first row of Table 1. In addition to this character, our research has identified a number of other such composite characters that are used.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Archangels
    Seven Archangels Marmoniel (“who hold the clouds in your hands”).[2] 1 Archangels in current church traditions The Catholic Church recognizes three archangels, the three mentioned in its canon of Scripture: Gabriel and Michael, mentioned in the New Testament, and Raphael, mentioned in the book of Tobit, where he is described as “one of the seven angels who stand ready and enter before the glory of the Lord”,[3] a phrase recalled in Revelation 8:2-6. Some strands of the Eastern Orthodox Church, exem- plified in the Orthodox Slavonic Bible (Ostrog Bible, Elizabeth Bible, and later consequently Russian Synodal Bible), recognize as authoritative also 2 Esdras, which mentions Uriel. Yet the Eastern Orthodox Church ac- cepts only Michael, Gabriel, Raphael and Uriel. As well as Uriel, the Book of Enoch, not regarded “Synaxis of the Archangel Michael” ("Собор Архистратига as canonical by any of these Christian churches, men- Михаила"). An Eastern Orthodox Church icon of the “Seven tions (chapter 21) Raguel, Sariel, and Jerahmeel, while Archangels". From left to right: Jegudiel, Gabriel, Selaphiel, other apocryphal sources give instead the names Izidkiel, Michael, Uriel, Raphael, Barachiel. Beneath the mandorla of Hanael, and Kepharel.[4] Christ Emmanuel are representations of Cherubim (in blue) and Seraphim (in red). In the Coptic Orthodox tradition the seven archangels are named as Gabriel, Michael, Raphael, Suriel, Zadakiel, Raguel, and Aniel. The earliest reference to a system of seven archangels In Anglican and Episcopal tradition, there are three or as a group appears to be in Enoch I (the Book of Enoch) four archangels in its calendar for September 29 feast which is not part of the Jewish Canon but is prevalent for St.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ukraine 2007 – Part 2
    Ukraine 2007 – Part 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostroh Ostroh (Ostrog) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostroh_Castle The Ostroh Castle (Ukrainian: Острозький замок, Ostroz'kyi zamok, Polish: Zamek w Ostrogu) is a castle in the city of Ostroh, located in the Rivne 1 Oblast of western Ukraine. In the 14th, 15th and 16th centuries, the castle was the key stronghold of the powerful House of Ostroh. Today it is in ruins. https://ostrohcastle.com.ua/galereya/ Музей / Museum https://ostrohcastle.com.ua/ekspozytsiyi-krayeznavchogo-muzeyu/ Експозиції Краєзнавчого музею Sculpture of Nestor, Chronicler / Скульптура Нестора, Летописца 2 3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostrog_Bible The Ostrog Bible (Ukrainian: Острозька Біблія, translit. Ostroz’ka Bibliya; Russian: Острожская Библия, translit. Ostrozhskaya Bibliya) was one of the earliest East Slavic translations of the Bible 5-candle candelabrum / П'ятисвічник. Гданськ. 1575 р. 4 Sculpture – “Wisdom defeats Death” / Скульптура, «Мудрость перемагае Смерть» Madonna & Son / Т,-О. Сосновський. Мадонна з немовлям. Мармур. 5 Т,-О. Сосновський. Ісус на смертному одрі. Мармур. Trinity Church of Mezhyrich Monastery (15th century) 6 http://ukrainetrek.com/blog/regions/holy-trinity-monastery-in-mezhyrich/ Mezhyrich Holy Trinity Monastery is a complex of monastic buildings of the 16th-17th centuries located in the village of Mezhyrich, 38 km south-east of Rivne. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Свято-Троицкий_Межиричский_монастырь Свято-Троицкий Межиричский монастырь ― комплекс монастырских строений XVI—XVII веков в селе Межирич на Волыни. По своей планировке, композиции, соединению светских, культовых и оборонительных особенностей, ренессансному декору принадлежит к выдающимся архитектурным памятникам Украины. 7 Князь Вдажимир / Prince Vladimir Княгиня Ольга / Princess Olga 8 Tetramorph (surround “throne”) / Тетрамо́ рф в иудео-христианском вероучении и богословии крылатое существо из видения пророка Иезекииля (VI век до н.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewritten Bible in the “Museum” Slavonic Translation of the Song of Songs
    _full_journalsubtitle: Journal of Patrology and Critical Hagiography _full_abbrevjournaltitle: SCRI _full_ppubnumber: ISSN 1817-7530 (print version) _full_epubnumber: ISSN 1817-7565 (online version) _full_issue: 1 _full_issuetitle: 0 _full_alt_author_running_head (change var. to _alt_author_rh): 0 _full_alt_articletitle_running_head (change var. to _alt_arttitle_rh): The “Museum” Slavonic Translation of the Song of Songs _full_alt_articletitle_toc: 0 _full_is_advance_article: 0 The “museum” Slavonic TranslationScrinium 14 (2018) Of The 257-272 Song Of Songs 257 www.brill.com/scri Rewritten Bible in the “Museum” Slavonic Translation of the Song of Songs Basil Lourié St. Petersburg, Russia; National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) [email protected] Summary The so-called “Museum” Slavonic translation of the Song of Songs contains a specific recension enrooted in Jewish Second Temple traditions. It becomes more plausible that the Slavonic translation has been produced in the earliest period of Slavic writing directly from Syriac rather than from Hebrew, as it was proposed earlier. Keywords Songs of Songs – Slavonic translations from Syriac – Slavonic Bible – Second Temple Jewish exegesis 1 Introduction Among the Slavonic versions of the Song of Songs, there are two which are now considered as being directly translated from the Hebrew. The later, whose Sitz im Leben is known, is dependent on the earlier. The earlier one remains rather enigmatic and, therefore, is the object of the present study. Both translations are preserved in the unique manuscripts: the earlier one in the so-called Museum manuscript (= Mus; Russian State Library, coll. 178, Nr 8222; first published by Anatoly Alekseev in 1981)1 and the later one in the Vil- 1 А.А. Алексеев, “Песнь Песней по списку XVI века в переводе с древнееврейского оригинала [The Song of Songs according to a Manuscript of the 16th Century Translated from a Hebrew Original],” Палестинский сборник, 27 (1981), pp.
    [Show full text]