DOCSLIB.ORG

NSAEC TN-102.5, Guidance for Stream Restoration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NSAEC TN-102.5, Guidance for Stream Restoration United States Departments of Agriculture and Interior Guidance for Stream Restoration Steven E. Yochum Lindsay V. Reynolds Forest Service Bureau of Land Management NSAEC TN-102.5 September 2020 Yochum, Steven E., Reynolds, Lindsay V. 2020. Guidance for Stream Restoration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management; Forest Service National Stream & Aquatic Ecology Center Technical Note TN-102.5. Fort Collins, Colorado. Cover Photos: Top-right: Illinois River, North Park, Colorado. Photo by Steven Yochum Bottom-left: Whychus Creek, Oregon. Photo by Paul Powers ABSTRACT Stream restoration practitioners and researchers have devoted a great deal of effort in recent decades to developing extensive guidance for stream restoration. The available resources are diverse, reflecting the wide ranging approaches used and expertise required to develop effective stream restoration projects. To help practitioners in sorting through the extensive amount of available information, this technical note has been developed to provide a guide to the available guidance. The document structure is primarily a series of short literature reviews followed by a hyperlinked reference list for readers to find more information on each topic. The primary topics incorporated into this guidance include general methods, an overview of stream processes and restoration, case studies, data compilation, preliminary assessments, and field data collection. Analysis methods and tools, and planning and design guidance for specific restoration features are also provided. This technical note is a bibliographic repository of information available to assist professionals with the process of planning, analyzing, and designing stream restoration projects. It is updated periodically. USFS; BLM TN-102.5 Fort Collins, Colorado Guidance for Stream Restoration i of vi September 2020 ADVISORY NOTE Techniques and approaches contained in this technical note are not all-inclusive, nor universally applicable. Designing stream In accordance with Federal civil rights law and restorations and rehabilitations requires U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil appropriate training and experience, especially to rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its identify conditions where various approaches, Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions tools, and techniques are most applicable, as well participating in or administering USDA programs as their limitations for design. Note also that are prohibited from discriminating based on race, product names are included only to show type and color, national origin, religion, sex, gender availability and do not constitute endorsement for identity (including gender expression), sexual their specific use. orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877- 8339. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.h tml and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected] . USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. USFS; BLM TN-102.5 Fort Collins, Colorado Guidance for Stream Restoration ii of vi September 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS This technical note was authored by Steven Yochum, PhD, PE, Hydrologist, U.S. Forest ABSTRACT ......................................................... i Service, National Stream and Aquatic Ecology ADVISORY NOTE ............................................. ii Center, and Lindsay Reynolds, PhD, Riparian ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................... iii Ecologist, Bureau of Land Management, National Operations Center. It is updated periodically. The CONTENTS ....................................................... iii groundwater section was contributed to by Joe FIGURES ............................................................ v Gurrieri, hydrogeologist with the Forest Service TABLES ............................................................. vi Minerals & Geology Management – Groundwater 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 Program. Administrative review of this latest 2. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................... 2 version was completed by David Levinson, 3. GENERAL METHODS .................................. 3 Program Manager, U.S. Forest Service, National Stream and Aquatic Ecology Center. 3.1 Interdisciplinary Team .............................. 3 3.2 Planning Process ....................................... 3 Peer review of version TN-102.1 of this guidance (which was authored by Steven Yochum) was 3.3 Watershed Approach ................................. 4 performed by Johan Hogervorst, USFS 4. RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT ........................ 5 Hydrologist; Robert Tanner, USFS Hydrologist; 5. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT ....................... 6 Paul Powers, USFS Aquatic Biologist; Brady Dodd, USFS Hydrologist; and Robert Gubernick, 6. OVERVIEW of STREAM PROCESSES and USFS Geologist. RESTORATION ................................................. 7 7. CASE STUDIES ............................................. 9 The original document was published by the 8. DATA COMPILATION ............................... 11 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Colorado State Office, with the initial version 8.1 Data Sources ............................................ 11 (Colorado Engineering Tech Note 27.1) released 8.1.1 Water Quantity ................................. 11 in June 2012. Peer review of the original NRCS 8.1.2 Water Quality and Sediment ............ 11 document was performed by Rob Sampson, NRCS 8.1.3 GIS Data and Mapping ..................... 11 State Conservation Engineer; Barry Southerland, 8.1.4 Climate Data ..................................... 12 NRCS Fluvial Geomorphologist; Brian Bledsoe, CSU Associate Professor of Civil and 8.1.5 Vegetative Information .................... 12 Environmental Engineering; Terri Sage, NRCS 8.1.6 Literature .......................................... 12 Biologist; and Christine Taliga, NRCS Plant 8.2 Geographic Information System ............. 13 Materials Specialist. 8.3 Historical Information ............................. 13 Other individuals have provided comments and 9. PRELIMINARY FIELD ASSESSMENT ..... 14 clarifications to the document; all of their 9.1 Fundamental Principles ........................... 16 contributions are highly appreciated. Please email Steven Yochum with any additional comments or 9.1.1 Total and Unit Stream Power ........... 16 suggestions, for inclusion in the next update. 9.1.2 Shear Stress ...................................... 17 9.1.3 Momentum ....................................... 17 9.1.4 Roughness and Flow Resistance ...... 17 9.1.5 Lane’s Balance ................................. 18 9.2 Stream Channel States and Evolution Models ........................................................... 18 9.3 Stream Classification ............................... 22 9.4 Stream Evolution Triangle ................ 23 9.5 Stream Ecological Valuation (SEV) ........ 24 USFS; BLM TN-102.5 Fort Collins, Colorado Guidance for Stream Restoration iii of vi September 2020 9.6 Basic Assessment Tools .......................... 24 11.11.5 Floodplains ................................... 57 10. MONITORING AND DATA COLLECTION 11.12 Groundwater ........................................ 58 FOR RESTORATION ...................................... 25 12. RESTORATION FEATURES .................... 60 10.1 Aquatic Organisms ................................ 26 12.1 Vegetation ............................................. 60 10.2 Riparian Vegetation .............................. 27 12.2 Livestock Grazing Management ........... 63 10.3 Topographic Survey Data ..................... 28 12.3 Large Wood ........................................... 66 10.4 Bankfull Stage Identification ................ 30 12.3.1 Management for Large Wood 10.5 Discharge Measurements ...................... 31 Recruitment and Retention ........................ 67 12.3.2 Large Wood Structures ................... 68 10.6 Water Quality ........................................ 32 12.4 Stream Habitat and Environmental Flows 10.7 Bed Material Sampling ......................... 33 ....................................................................... 70 10.8 Sediment Transport Measurements ....... 34 12.5 Longitudinal Connectivity ..................... 74 10.9 Groundwater Monitoring ...................... 35 12.6 Fish Screening ......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Science Board, Staff, Divisional Committees And
    . APPENDIX I NATIONALSCIENCEBOARD, STAFF, D~VISIONALCOMMMTEESAND ADVISORY PANELS NATIONALSCIENCEBOARD Terms Expire May lo,1956 JOHN W. DAVIS, President (ret.), West Virginia State College, Englewood, N. J. EDWIN B. FRED, President, the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. hJRENCE M. GOULD, President, Carleton College, Northfield, Minn. PAUL M. GROSS: Vice President and Dean of Duke University, Duke University, Durham, N. C. GEORGE D. HUMPHREY, President, the University of Wyoming, Laramie, wyo. 0. W. HYMAN, Vice President, the University of Tennessee, Memphis, Term. FREDERICK A. MIDDLEBUSH,~ President Emeritus, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. EARL P. STJWENSON,~ President, Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, Mass. Terms Expire May lo,1958 SOPHIE D. ABERLE,~ Special Research Director, the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, N. Mex. CHESTER I. BARN~,~ Chairman of the Board, President (ret.), Rocke- feller Foundation, New York, N. Y. ROBERT P. BARNES, Professor of Chemistry, Howard University, Washing- ton, D. C. DETLEV W. BRONIC,~ Vice Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee, President, National Academy of Sciences, Wash- ington, D. C., and President, Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York, N. Y. GERTY T. Coar, Professor of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO. CHARLES DOLLARD, President, Carnegie Corp. of New York, New York, N. Y. ROBERT F. LOEB,~ Bard Professor of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, N. Y. ANDREY A. POTTER, Dean Emeritus of Engineering, Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind. Terms Expire May 10, 1960 RWER ADAMS, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana, Ill. 60 FOURTE ANNUAL REPORT 61 THEODORE M.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Management Final Exam
    WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Fall 2005 FW/ZO 353 FINAL EXAM Here is your final exam for FW/ZO 353, Wildlife Management. The base for your final grade will be determined by this exam (30%), and your 4 best quizzes (70%) modified by your pop-quizzes. INFORMATION Please read the questions carefully. Think about each question and do not answer questions too quickly. Relax, you have more than enough time for this exam, so take that time. Feel free to ask me questions. Before turning in your answer sheet, sit and relax for a few minutes and think about your answers, or just sit and relax. If you wish to explain your answers for certain questions more fully, feel free to turn in with your answer sheet a piece of paper with those explanations. Remember to put your name on that piece of paper. If you do not have a piece of paper, ask me for one. NAME On the computer answer sheet, please be certain to fill in your name circles, LAST NAME FIRST, so that the computer can generate an answer sheet for you. HONOR CODE North Carolina State University has an Honor Code that applies to this exam. If you acknowledge that you "have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this" exam, sign your name in the NAME space on the backside of your answer sheet. POSTING FINAL GRADE I shall submit grades electronically, with luck tonight. I am going to Saskatoon for 3 days for a small conference aimed at finding more bear-friendly ways to live-trap grizzly bears.
    [Show full text]
  • Union County Glacier
    In Memory of Luna B. Leopold e c n e i c S y r a t e n a l P 1915–2006 & h t r a E f o . t p e D y e l e k r e B C U y s e t r u o c o t o h P una Leopold, professor emeritus at the University of Cali- 1972 to 1986 he held the position of professor of earth and plane- fornia, Berkeley, and former chief hydrologist of the U.S. tary science and of landscape architecture at the University of Cal- LGeological Survey died at his home in Berkeley on February ifornia, Berkeley. “He made crucial discoveries about the nature of 23, 2006. The son of conservationist Aldo Leopold, Luna Leopold rivers, especially their remarkable regularity,” William Dietrich, a became widely recognized as one of our country’s most distin- UC Berkeley colleague of Leopold’s and professor of earth and guished earth scientists and will be remembered for his pioneer- planetary science, said in a news release. “He showed that this ing studies of rivers and fluvial geomorphology and for his tire- regularity of form applies to all rivers, whether they are in sand less work toward protecting and restoring rivers, water resources, boxes or draining entire continents, at scales of a laboratory flume and the environment. or the Gulf Stream.” Luna Leopold was born in Albuquerque. His father, Aldo During his time with the U.S. Geological Survey Leopold was Leopold, was pursuing his career with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Categories
    Subject Categories Click on a Subject Category below: Anthropology Archaeology Astronomy and Astrophysics Atmospheric Sciences and Oceanography Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Business and Finance Cellular and Developmental Biology and Genetics Chemistry Communications, Journalism, Editing, and Publishing Computer Sciences and Technology Economics Educational, Scientific, Cultural, and Philanthropic Administration (Nongovernmental) Engineering and Technology Geology and Mineralogy Geophysics, Geography, and Other Earth Sciences History Law and Jurisprudence Literary Scholarship and Criticism and Language Literature (Creative Writing) Mathematics and Statistics Medicine and Health Microbiology and Immunology Natural History and Ecology; Evolutionary and Population Biology Neurosciences, Cognitive Sciences, and Behavioral Biology Performing Arts and Music – Criticism and Practice Philosophy Physics Physiology and Pharmacology Plant Sciences Political Science / International Relations Psychology / Education Public Affairs, Administration, and Policy (Governmental and Intergovernmental) Sociology / Demography Theology and Ministerial Practice Visual Arts, Art History, and Architecture Zoology Subject Categories of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 1780–2019 Das, Veena Gellner, Ernest Andre Leach, Edmund Ronald Anthropology Davis, Allison (William Gluckman, Max (Herman Leakey, Mary Douglas Allison) Max) Nicol Adams, Robert Descola, Philippe Goddard, Pliny Earle Leakey, Richard Erskine McCormick DeVore, Irven (Boyd Goodenough, Ward Hunt Frere Adler-Lomnitz, Larissa Irven) Goody, John Rankine Lee, Richard Borshay Appadurai, Arjun Dillehay, Tom D. Grayson, Donald K. LeVine, Robert Alan Bailey, Frederick George Dixon, Roland Burrage Greenberg, Joseph Levi-Strauss, Claude Barth, Fredrik Dodge, Ernest Stanley Harold Levy, Robert Isaac Bateson, Gregory Donnan, Christopher B. Greenhouse, Carol J. Levy, Thomas Evan Beall, Cynthia M. Douglas, Mary Margaret Grove, David C. Lewis, Oscar Benedict, Ruth Fulton Du Bois, Cora Alice Gumperz, John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Conservation
    RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE LIBRARY COLLECTION RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE LIBRARY COLLECTION NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Essays on America’s Natural Resources Perspectives On Conservation Perspectives On Conservation Essays on America’s Natural Resources Henry Jarrett Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 21:27 09 May 2016 )3". RFF Press strives to minimize its impact on the environment Henry Jarrett Content Type: Black & White Paper Type: White Page Count: 278 File type: Internal Natural Resource Management Vol 5.qxd 9/17/2010 2:28 PM Page i RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE LIBRARY COLLECTION NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Volume 5 Perspectives on Conservation Essays on America’s Natural Resources Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 21:27 09 May 2016 Natural Resource Management Vol 5.qxd 9/17/2010 2:28 PM Page ii Full list of titles in the set NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Volume 1: New Deal Planning Volume 2: America’s Renewable Resources Volume 3: Land Use and the States Volume 4: Comparisons in Resource Management Volume 5: Perspectives on Conservation Volume 6: The World Copper Industry Volume 7: Conservation and Economic Efficiency Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 21:27 09 May 2016 Perspectives on Conservation Essays on America's Natural Resources Henry Jarrett Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 21:27 09 May 2016 ~RFFPRESS - RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE New York • London First published in 1958 by The johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future This edition first published in 2011 by RFF Press, an imprint of Earthscan First edition ©The johns Hopkins University Press 1958 This edition © Earthscan 1958, 2011 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • History Newsletter CENTER for HISTORY of PHYSICS&NIELS BOHR LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Vol
    History Newsletter CENTER FOR HISTORY OF PHYSICS&NIELS BOHR LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Vol. 46, No. 2 • Fall 2014 The History Programs Publish Physics Entrepreneurship and Innovation By R. Joseph Anderson, Director, Niels Bohr Library & Archives We completed our most recent study PhD physicists and other professionals energy sources, and laser sensors and of physicists working in the private who co-founded and work at some 91 communications, along with a variety of sector at the end of 2013, and the startup companies in 14 states that were new manufacturing tools. final report, Physics Entrepreneurship established in the last few decades. and Innovation, is now available The four-year study is focused on both in print and online. While the investigating the structure and physicists in the study don’t fit the dynamics of physics entrepreneurship conventional model of hard-driving, and understanding some of the risk taking entrepreneurs, physics- factors that lead to the success or based entrepreneurship plays a vital failure of new startups, including role in innovation and the ongoing funding, technology transfer, location, transformation of American industry business models, and marketing. We in just about every business sector. have also considered ways that the companies can work with private For much of the 20th century, and public archives to preserve technological innovations that drove historically valuable records so that U.S. economic growth emerged from future researchers can understand "idea factories" housed within large today’s technology and economy. Our companies—research units like Bell findings include: Labs or Xerox PARC that developed everything from the transistor to • No national standard of entrepre- the computer mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Baylands Ecosystem Habitat Goals a Report of Habitat Recommendations
    Baylands Ecosystem Baylands Ecosystem Teams of Bay Area environmental scientists have assessed abitat Goals the past and present conditions of the baylands ecosystem and recommended ways to improve its ecological health. This report presents the Baylands Ecosystem Goals. Habitat Goals Habitat Goals H A Report of Habitat Recommendations Prepared by the San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Ecosystem Goals Project Db Deep Bay/Channel Basic Baylands Facts Sb Shallow Bay/Channel The baylands exist around the Bay between the lines of high and Tf Tidal Flat low tide. They are the lands touched by the tides, plus the lands that Tm Tidal Marsh the tides would touch in the absence of any levees or other unnat- Tp Tidal Marsh Pan ural structures. Lg Lagoon There are 73,000 acres of tidal baylands and 139,000 acres of diked Bc Beach/Dune baylands. Ag Agricultural Bayland There used to be 23 miles of sandy beaches. Now there are about Dw Diked Wetland seven miles of beaches. Most of the present beaches occur in differ- Sp Salt Pond ent locations than the historical beaches. St Storage or Treatment Pond There used to be 190,000 acres of tidal marsh with 6,000 miles of Uf Undeveloped Bay Fill channels and 8,000 acres of shallow pans. Now there are 40,000 Df Developed Bay Fill acres of tidal marsh with about 1,000 miles of channels and 250 Pr Perennial Pond acres of pans. Rw Riparian Forest/Willow Grove Only 16,000 acres of the historical tidal marsh remain. The rest of Mg Moist Grassland the present tidal marsh has naturally evolved from tidal flat, been Gr Grassland/Vernal Pool Complex restored from diked baylands, or muted by water control structures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regental Laureates Distinguished Presidential
    REPORT TO CONTRIBUTORS Explore the highlights of this year’s report and learn more about how your generosity is making an impact on Washington and the world. CONTRIBUTOR LISTS (click to view) • The Regental Laureates • Henry Suzzallo Society • The Distinguished Presidential Laureates • The President’s Club • The Presidential Laureates • The President’s Club Young Leaders • The Laureates • The Benefactors THE REGENTAL LAUREATES INDIVIDUALS & ORGANIZATIONS / Lifetime giving totaling $100 million and above With their unparalleled philanthropic vision, our Regental Laureates propel the University of Washington forward — raising its profile, broadening its reach and advancing its mission around the world. Acknowledgement of the Regental Laureates can also be found on our donor wall in Suzzallo Library. Paul G. Allen & The Paul G. Allen Family Foundation Bill & Melinda Gates Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Microsoft DISTINGUISHED PRESIDENTIAL LAUREATES INDIVIDUALS & ORGANIZATIONS / Lifetime giving totaling $50 million to $99,999,999 Through groundbreaking contributions, our Distinguished Presidential Laureates profoundly alter the landscape of the University of Washington and the people it serves. Distinguished Presidential Laureates are listed in alphabetical order. Donors who have asked to be anonymous are not included in the listing. Acknowledgement of the Distinguished Presidential Laureates can also be found on our donor wall in Suzzallo Library. American Heart Association The Ballmer Group Boeing The Foster Foundation Jack MacDonald* Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Washington Research Foundation * = Deceased Bold Type Indicates donor reached giving level in fiscal year 2016–2017 1 THE PRESIDENTIAL LAUREATES INDIVIDUALS & ORGANIZATIONS / Lifetime giving totaling $10 million to $49,999,999 By matching dreams with support, Presidential Laureates further enrich the University of Washington’s top-ranked programs and elevate emerging disciplines to new heights.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: the Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project
    Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: The Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project Several Florida environmental controversies that unfolded in the 1960s and 1970s profoundly affected the climate in which Everglades National Park operated. Some of these struggles played out in nearby areas like the Big Cypress Swamp, while others took place some distance away in North Florida. The cumulative effect of these con- troversies was to raise environmental awareness in the state and add substantially to the number of people who cared about and advocated for Everglades National Park. This interest in the environment was part of a larger national trend that politicians were beginning to respond to. Some of this broader background will be briefly consid- ered before the narrative returns to Everglades National Park’s water issues. Historians agree that environmentalism became a force to be reckoned with in the United States in the 1960s. The post-World-War-II economic boom brought with it a host of unforeseen consequences, like air and water pollution and the widespread conversion of open space to factories, roads, and residential subdivisions. Concern over the degradation of the environment moved from scientific and academic circles to the general public in the 1960s. Many credit Rachel Carson’s 1962 best-seller Silent Spring with introducing the concept of environmentalism to a broad public. Carson’s book focused on the devastating effects on bird reproduction of the use of persistent pesticides like DDT (dicholoro-diphenyl-trichloroethane), but it had a broader mes- sage. In forceful and eloquent prose, Carson called for a rethinking of the whole con- cept of human control of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Aldo Starker Leopold
    Aldo Starker Leopold : wildlife biologist and public policy maker by Carol Henrietta Leigh Rydell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Montana State University © Copyright by Carol Henrietta Leigh Rydell (1993) Abstract: Aldo Starker Leopold (1913-1983), the eldest son of conservationist Aldo Leopold (1887-1948), played during his life, a crucial role in forming wildlife management policy at both state and federal levels; Trained as a zoologist at the University of California in Berkeley, Leopold spent his early years as a wildlife biologist working on such issues as heritable wildness in turkeys and cataloging the wildlife of Mexico. From his position as professor of zoology at the University of California in Berkeley, however, he quickly became embroiled in wildlife controversies with policy implications. In the late 1940s and throughout the 1950s, for example, Leopold worked on deer management issues with California's Fish and Game Department. In 1962 then Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall appointed Leopold to head a special advisory board on wildlife management. As chairman of that board, Leopold authored at least three important reports on wildlife management in the National Parks, predator and rodent control and the national wildlife system. By the end of the 1960s, Leopold had carved a niche in wildlife management circles separate from his father's. This thesis is an intellectual biography of Aldo Starker Leopold. It is based on research into his published and unpublished writings and his personal papers. ALDO STARKER LEOPOLD WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST AND PUBLIC POLICY MAKER .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 November 2015 Feature Volume 96, Issue 20
    VOL. 96 • NO. 20 • 1 NOV 2015 Contaminated Sediment and Dam Removals Baseball and Earthquakes Earth & Space Science News Field Data Management Integrating Cyberscience and Geoscience Act Now to Save on Registration and Housing. Housing and Early Registration Deadline: 12 November 11:59 P.M. EST fallmeeting.agu.org Earth & Space Science News Contents 1 NOVEMBER 2015 FEATURE VOLUME 96, ISSUE 20 12 Contaminated Sediment and Dam Removals: Problem or Opportunity? Restoring rivers to their free-flowing state promises a host of environmental benefits, but contaminated sediments may cloud the picture. OPINION 9 My Life in Baseball and Earthquakes How earthquakes interrupted a Royals game and thrust the author into a whirlpool of politics, media, and law. 18 RESEARCH SPOTLIGHT COVER Spacecraft Records 36 Rising-Tone Field Data Management: Magnetosonic Waves Integrating Cyberscience and Geoscience A rising tone in wave frequencies suggests a complicated, nonlinear series of The smartphone and tablet revolution has changed how geologists interactions between electromagnetic work in the field, but now the community must come up with sound waves and protons near the standards to tame the flood of data. magnetic equator. Earth & Space Science News Eos.org // 1 Contents DEPARTMENTS Editor in Chief Barbara T. Richman: AGU, Washington, D. C., USA; eos_ [email protected] Editors Christina M. S. Cohen Wendy S. Gordon Carol A. Stein California Institute Ecologia Consulting, Department of Earth and of Technology, Pasadena, Austin, Texas, USA; Environmental Sciences, Calif., USA; wendy@ecologiaconsulting University of Illinois at cohen@srl .caltech.edu .com Chicago, Chicago, Ill., USA; [email protected] José D. Fuentes David Halpern Department of Meteorology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pennsylvania State Pasadena, Calif., USA; University, University davidhalpern29@gmail Park, Pa., USA; .com [email protected] Editorial Advisory Board M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complex Network Approach to Phylogenetic Trees: from Genes to the Tree of Life
    A Complex Network Approach to Phylogenetic Trees: From Genes to the Tree of Life TESI DOCTORAL E. Alejandro Herrada Directors: Prof. Emilio Hernández- García Dr. Víctor M. Eguíluz Prof. Carlos M. Duarte Ponent: Prof. José A. Castro Ocón Presentada al Departament de Biologia Universitat de les Illes Balears 2010 A Complex Network Approach to Phylogenetic Trees: From Genes to the Tree of Life E. Alejandro Herrada Tesi presentada al Departament de Biologia de la Universitat de les Illes Balears PhD Thesis Directors: Prof. Emilio Hernández-García, Dr. Víctor M. Eguíluz and Prof. Carlos M. Duarte Copyleft 2010, E. Alejandro Herrada Univertsitat de les Illes Balears Palma de Mallorca This document was typeset with LATEX 2" ii Tesi doctoral presentada per E. Alejandro Herrada per optar al títol de Doctor, en el Programa de Biologia del Departament de Biologia de la Universitat de les Illes Balears, realitzada a l’IFISC sota la direcció de Emilio Hernández-García, Professor de Investigació del CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), Víctor M. Eguíluz, Científic Titular del CSIC i Carlos M. Duarte, Professor de Investigació del CSIC, i amb José A. Castro Ocón, Catedràtic d’Universitat, com a ponent. Vist i plau Directors de la tesi Prof. Emilio Hernández- Dr. Víctor M. Eguíluz Prof. Carlos M. Duarte García Ponent Doctorant Prof. José A. Castro Ocón E. Alejandro Herrada Palma, 02 de novembre de 2010 iii iv A Lu y Jutta v “All animal life has the right to be respected.” — Art. 2 of the Universal Declaration of Animal Rights (UNESCO, 1990) vii Acknowledgments Quisiera agradecer a mis directores, el Prof.
    [Show full text]