DOCSLIB.ORG

Jamaica Bay Watershed Protection Plan Volume I – Regional Profile New York City Department of Environmental Protection Emily Lloyd, Commissioner October 1, 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jamaica Bay Watershed Protection Plan Volume I – Regional Profile New York City Department of Environmental Protection Emily Lloyd, Commissioner October 1, 2007 Jamaica Bay Watershed Protection Plan Volume I – Regional Profile New York City Department of Environmental Protection Emily Lloyd, Commissioner October 1, 2007 Volume 1: Jamaica Bay Watershed Protection Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................iii Chapter 1 - Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE VALUE OF JAMAICA BAY .............................................................................................. 1 1.2 IS JAMAICA BAY LIKE CENTRAL PARK?........................................................................... 3 1.3 LOCAL LAW 71 AND INTRODUCTION 376 .......................................................................... 4 1.4 ORGANIZATION OF THIS PLAN ............................................................................................ 5 Chapter 2 - Jamaica Bay and Its Watershed: Landscape and Setting............................................. 7 2.1 JAMAICA BAY ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 HISTORICAL SETTING ............................................................................................................. 8 2.3 GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING.................................................................................................... 15 2.4 CLIMATOLOGICAL SETTING .............................................................................................. 18 2.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................................................ 20 2.6 HYDROLOGY............................................................................................................................. 22 2.7 GROUND WATER SUPPLY ..................................................................................................... 25 2.8 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 27 Chapter 3 - Water Quality ................................................................................................................. 29 3.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... 29 3.2 WATER QUALITY OF THE BAY ........................................................................................... 30 3.2.1 Water Quality Standards............................................................................................................ 30 3.2.2 Nitrogen...................................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.3 Dissolved Oxygen ....................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.4 Pathogens ................................................................................................................................... 35 3.2.5 Chlorophyll α.............................................................................................................................. 35 3.3 WATER QUALITY OF THE TRIBUTARIES ........................................................................ 36 3.3.1 The Tributaries........................................................................................................................... 36 3.3.2 Bergen and Thurston Basins..................................................................................................... 37 3.4 POLLUTANT SOURCES...........................................................................................................39 3.4.1 Background ................................................................................................................................39 3.4.2 Wastewater Discharges .............................................................................................................. 39 3.4.3 Combined Sewer Overflows ....................................................................................................... 42 3.4.4 Storm Sewers.............................................................................................................................. 43 3.4.5 Landfills...................................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.6 Ground Water............................................................................................................................. 43 3.4.7 Atmospheric Deposition............................................................................................................. 43 3.4.8 Tidal Exchange and Rockaway Inlet ........................................................................................ 44 3.5 RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF POLLUTANT SOURCES.............................................. 44 3.6 CURRENT PROGRAMS TO ADDRESS WATER QUALITY CONCERNS IN JAMAICA BAY AND ITS TRIBUTARIES........................................................................................................ 45 3.6.1 Nitrogen Control Order on Consent/Consent Judgment.......................................................... 45 3.6.2.CSO Consent Order ................................................................................................................... 46 3.6.3.Comprehensive Jamaica Bay Water Quality Plan.................................................................... 46 October 1, 2007 i Volume 1: Jamaica Bay Watershed Protection Plan 3.6.4 Other Water Pollution Control Plants Projects and Program................................................. 47 3.6.5 Combined Sewer Overflow Retention Projects and Programs................................................. 48 3.7 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 50 Chapter 4 - Ecology ............................................................................................................................ 52 4.1 THE JAMAICA BAY ECOSYSTEM........................................................................................ 52 4.2 AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT..................................................................................................... 53 4.3 WETLANDS................................................................................................................................. 57 4.4 SEDIMENT QUALITY IN THE BAY ...................................................................................... 61 4.5 SHORELINE................................................................................................................................ 65 4.6 UPLANDS..................................................................................................................................... 67 4.7 URBAN ECOLOGY.................................................................................................................... 69 4.8 VEGETATION ............................................................................................................................ 70 4.9 WILDLIFE ................................................................................................................................... 73 4.10 INVASIVE SPECIES ................................................................................................................ 73 4.11 CURRENT ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION EFFORTS IN JAMAICA BAY................ 73 4.12 REFERENCES........................................................................................................................... 73 Chapter 5 - Public Access, Open Space, and Recreation................................................................. 73 Chapter 6 - Land Use and Development........................................................................................... 73 6.1 WATERSHED NEIGHBORHOODS ........................................................................................ 73 6.2 LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING .................................................................................. 73 6.2.1 Land Use..................................................................................................................................... 73 6.2.2 Zoning ........................................................................................................................................ 73 6.3 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 73 Chapter 7 - Watershed Stakeholders and Public Outreach Efforts............................................... 73 7.1 GOVERNMENTAL AND REGULATORY AGENCIES ....................................................... 73 7.2 NON-GOVERNMENTAL AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS.................................. 73 7.3 PUBLIC OUTREACH PROGRAM TO SUPPORT THIS PLAN.......................................... 73 Chapter 8 - Previous and Current Planning Efforts........................................................................ 73 8.1 THE PAST.................................................................................................................................... 73 8.2 RESTORATION/CONSERVATION PLANS .......................................................................... 73 8.3 OTHER NEW YORK
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Science Board, Staff, Divisional Committees And
    . APPENDIX I NATIONALSCIENCEBOARD, STAFF, D~VISIONALCOMMMTEESAND ADVISORY PANELS NATIONALSCIENCEBOARD Terms Expire May lo,1956 JOHN W. DAVIS, President (ret.), West Virginia State College, Englewood, N. J. EDWIN B. FRED, President, the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. hJRENCE M. GOULD, President, Carleton College, Northfield, Minn. PAUL M. GROSS: Vice President and Dean of Duke University, Duke University, Durham, N. C. GEORGE D. HUMPHREY, President, the University of Wyoming, Laramie, wyo. 0. W. HYMAN, Vice President, the University of Tennessee, Memphis, Term. FREDERICK A. MIDDLEBUSH,~ President Emeritus, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. EARL P. STJWENSON,~ President, Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, Mass. Terms Expire May lo,1958 SOPHIE D. ABERLE,~ Special Research Director, the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, N. Mex. CHESTER I. BARN~,~ Chairman of the Board, President (ret.), Rocke- feller Foundation, New York, N. Y. ROBERT P. BARNES, Professor of Chemistry, Howard University, Washing- ton, D. C. DETLEV W. BRONIC,~ Vice Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee, President, National Academy of Sciences, Wash- ington, D. C., and President, Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York, N. Y. GERTY T. Coar, Professor of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO. CHARLES DOLLARD, President, Carnegie Corp. of New York, New York, N. Y. ROBERT F. LOEB,~ Bard Professor of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, N. Y. ANDREY A. POTTER, Dean Emeritus of Engineering, Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind. Terms Expire May 10, 1960 RWER ADAMS, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana, Ill. 60 FOURTE ANNUAL REPORT 61 THEODORE M.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H – Cultural Resources H-1 New York City Transit, Fulton Street Transit Center, New York
    PROPOSED FULTON STREET TRANSIT CENTER FULTON, DEY, CHURCH, & WILLIAM STREETS AND BROADWAY BLOCK 79, LOTS 15, 16, 18, 19 AND 21 NEW YORK, NEW YORK PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for: New York City Transit New York, New York Prepared by: The Louis Berger Group, Inc. New York, New York October 2003 MTA New York City Transit Fulton Street Transit Center DEIS APPENDIX H: CULTURAL RESOURCES H.1 INTRODUCTION New York City Transit (NYCT) is planning to construct the Fulton Street Transit Center (FSTC) in the vicinity of Fulton Street and Broadway, covering portions of Fulton Street, Dey Street, Church Street, William Street and Broadway, with direct impacts to Block 79, Lots 15, 16, 18, 19 and 21, New York City, New York (see Figures 1 and 2). The Proposed Action includes: • Construction of a new Entry Facility building at Block 79, Lots 15, 16, 18, 19 and 21, designed to connect subway passengers with other elements of the FSTC; • Construction of a pedestrian tunnel underneath Dey Street, the Dey Street Passageway, from the Entry Facility at Broadway and to the redeveloped World Trade Center (WTC) site and RW service at the Cortlandt Street station at Church and Dey Streets; • Improvements to the Fulton Street AC underground mezzanines and JMZ entrances and mezzanines, by widening the existing facilities; • Installation of stairways at the southwest and southeast corners of the intersection of Maiden Lane and Broadway, and installation of stairway, escalator and an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) elevator at the southwest corner of Dey Street and Broadway to improve street access; • Rehabilitation of the existing 23 and 45 stations at Fulton Street; and, • Creation of a new, paid RW - E and an unpaid E to the FSTC connections along Church Street at the Chambers Street and WTC - Cortlandt Street stations.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Construct a Concrete Canoe Construction Report 2011
    How to construct a concrete canoe Construction Report 2011 Enschede, May 2011 BetonBrouwers Study Association ConcepT School of Civil Engineering - University of Twente Preface Preceding on what is coming we want to outline the amount of work that has been shifted by the BetonBrouwers1 and everyone that bears a warm heart towards BetonBrouwen. The concrete canoe challenges in Eindhoven (NL) and Magdeburg (DU) are approaching rapidly, meaning that a year of hard work has passed. And how.... Based on our experiences from seasons 2007 & 2008 a new design and a lightweight concrete mixture were developed for season 2009. With an in theory very competitive concrete canoe, we participated in the Dutch and German competition. Luckily it turned out that it was not only a very competitive canoe in theory but also on the water. Season 2009 became the biggest success in the history of the BetonBrouwers. By dominating the Dutch competition and by winning the men’s race in Germany the BetonBrouwers became ‘European Champion’! In 2010 we dominated the Dutch competition again with the same successful design, but with a new concrete mixture. Since the German competition only takes place once in two years, it’s this year that we can defend our title of the men’s race. Because our neighbours will be very keen on getting the challenge cup back to Germany, it meant that we had to develop even better canoes. As in fact this year’s goal was to improve the design. Already in an early stage we found not much could be improved, but only optimised.
    [Show full text]
  • July 8 Grants Press Release
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 109 GRANTS THROUGH NYC GREEN RELIEF & RECOVERY FUND AND GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC GRANT APPLICATION NOW OPEN FOR PARK VOLUNTEER GROUPS Funding Awarded For Maintenance and Stewardship of Parks by Nonprofit Organizations and For Free Live Performances in Parks, Plazas, and Gardens Across NYC July 8, 2021 - NEW YORK, NY - City Parks Foundation announced today the selection of 109 grants through two competitive funding opportunities - the NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund and GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC. More than ever before, New Yorkers have come to rely on parks and open spaces, the most fundamentally democratic and accessible of public resources. Parks are critical to our city’s recovery and reopening – offering fresh air, recreation, and creativity - and a crucial part of New York’s equitable economic recovery and environmental resilience. These grant programs will help to support artists in hosting free, public performances and programs in parks, plazas, and gardens across NYC, along with the nonprofit organizations that help maintain many of our city’s open spaces. Both grant programs are administered by City Parks Foundation. The NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund will award nearly $2M via 64 grants to NYC-based small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. Grants will help to support basic maintenance and operations within heavily-used parks and open spaces during a busy summer and fall with the city’s reopening. Notable projects supported by this fund include the Harlem Youth Gardener Program founded during summer 2020 through a collaboration between Friends of Morningside Park Inc., Friends of St. Nicholas Park, Marcus Garvey Park Alliance, & Jackie Robinson Park Conservancy to engage neighborhood youth ages 14-19 in paid horticulture along with the Bronx River Alliance’s EELS Youth Internship Program and Volunteer Program to invite thousands of Bronxites to participate in stewardship of the parks lining the river banks.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • Mesa College Student Services Center
    Schedule of Events 5:30 PM Reception/Animal Exhibits 7:00 PM Dinner 8:00 PM Awards 9:00 PM Scholarship/Raffle Opportunity Drawing 9:15 PM Dancing San Diego 2012-2013 Officers & Directors JAMES FROST, PE, President EMIL RUDOLPH, P.E., Director B TIM SHELL, PE, President-Elect MARK HILL, PE, Director C STEVE FITZWILLIAM, PE, Vice President CRAIG SHANNON, PE, YMF Director JENIENE KNIGHT, Treasurer LARRY PIERCE, PE, Region 9 Governor JOHN KILPS, PE, Secretary DEAN GIPSON, PE, Past President ANTHONY SANCHEZ, Ph.D., PE, Director A “TAKE A WALK ON THE WILD SIDE” 1 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Thank You To Our Sponsors WINE LION TY Lin International Nolte Vertical Five CENTERPIECE ELEPHANT Simon Wong Engineering Ninyo & Moore V&A Consulting PROGRAM Duckor Spradling Metzger & Wynne Rick Engineering Beta Engineering GIRAFFE Dokken Engineering A/V Geocon CH2M Hill Snipes-Dye Associates RBF Consulting Southern California Soil & Testing AWARD MEERKAT Kimley-Horn RCP Block & Brick URS SDG&E Atkins HDR Engineering “TAKE A WALK ON THE WILD SIDE” 2 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Awards Event Committee CHAIR: Steven Fitzwilliam, Geosyntec Consultants COMMITTEE: Jennifer Barrett, CH2M Hill Allison Brittain, Simon Wong Engineering/Kleinfelder Jacque Bushardt, Simon Wong Engineering/Kleinfelder Paul Cooley, MWH Americas, Inc. James Frost, Simon Wong Engineering/Kleinfelder Rebekah Gladson, FAIA DBIA, rggroup global, inc. Mike Harding, Geosyntec Consultants Jeniene Knight Dean Gipson, HDR Engineering, Inc. James Lew, UCSD Student Anna F. Roppo, Esq., Duckor Spradling Metzger & Wynne Timothy Shell, City of Vista Mark Webb, Nolte Vertical Five (NV5) Cathy Riley, ASCE Awards Selection Committee Manuel Aceves, Life Member David Akers, Life Member Keith Gallistel, Life Member Nadine L.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Measures the State of Parks in Brooklyn
    P a g e | 1 Table of Contents Introduction Page 2 Methodology Page 2 Park Breakdown Page 5 Multiple/No Community District Jurisdictions Page 5 Brooklyn Community District 1 Page 6 Brooklyn Community District 2 Page 12 Brooklyn Community District 3 Page 18 Brooklyn Community District 4 Page 23 Brooklyn Community District 5 Page 26 Brooklyn Community District 6 Page 30 Brooklyn Community District 7 Page 34 Brooklyn Community District 8 Page 36 Brooklyn Community District 9 Page 38 Brooklyn Community District 10 Page 39 Brooklyn Community District 11 Page 42 Brooklyn Community District 12 Page 43 Brooklyn Community District 13 Page 45 Brooklyn Community District 14 Page 49 Brooklyn Community District 15 Page 50 Brooklyn Community District 16 Page 53 Brooklyn Community District 17 Page 57 Brooklyn Community District 18 Page 59 Assessment Outcomes Page 62 Summary Recommendations Page 63 Appendix 1: Survey Questions Page 64 P a g e | 2 Introduction There are 877 parks in Brooklyn, of varying sizes and amenities. This report measures the state of parks in Brooklyn. There are many different kinds of parks — active, passive, and pocket — and this report focuses on active parks that have a mix of amenities and uses. It is important for Brooklynites to have a pleasant park in their neighborhood to enjoy open space, meet their neighbors, play, and relax. While park equity is integral to creating One Brooklyn — a place where all residents can enjoy outdoor recreation and relaxation — fulfilling the vision of community parks first depends on measuring our current state of parks. This report will be used as a tool to guide my parks capital allocations and recommendations to the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (NYC Parks), as well as to identify recommendations to improve advocacy for parks at the community and grassroots level in order to improve neighborhoods across the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • NYC Park Crime Stats
    1st QTRPARK CRIME REPORT SEVEN MAJOR COMPLAINTS Report covering the period Between Jan 1, 2018 and Mar 31, 2018 GRAND LARCENY OF PARK BOROUGH SIZE (ACRES) CATEGORY Murder RAPE ROBBERY FELONY ASSAULT BURGLARY GRAND LARCENY TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLE PELHAM BAY PARK BRONX 2771.75 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 VAN CORTLANDT PARK BRONX 1146.43 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 01000 01 ROCKAWAY BEACH AND BOARDWALK QUEENS 1072.56 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 FRESHKILLS PARK STATEN ISLAND 913.32 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK QUEENS 897.69 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 01002 03 LATOURETTE PARK & GOLF COURSE STATEN ISLAND 843.97 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 MARINE PARK BROOKLYN 798.00 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 BELT PARKWAY/SHORE PARKWAY BROOKLYN/QUEENS 760.43 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 BRONX PARK BRONX 718.37 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 01000 01 FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT BOARDWALK AND BEACH STATEN ISLAND 644.35 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 ALLEY POND PARK QUEENS 635.51 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 PROSPECT PARK BROOKLYN 526.25 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 04000 04 FOREST PARK QUEENS 506.86 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY QUEENS 460.16 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 FERRY POINT PARK BRONX 413.80 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 CONEY ISLAND BEACH & BOARDWALK BROOKLYN 399.20 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 CUNNINGHAM PARK QUEENS 358.00 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 RICHMOND PARKWAY STATEN ISLAND 350.98 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 CROSS ISLAND PARKWAY QUEENS 326.90 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 GREAT KILLS PARK STATEN ISLAND 315.09 ONE ACRE
    [Show full text]
  • Sunset Park South Historic District
    DESIGNATION REPORT Sunset Park South Historic District Landmarks Preservation Designation Report Designation List 513 Commission Sunset Park South LP-2622 Historic District June 18, 2019 ESSAY RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY Michael Caratzas and Jessica Baldwin BUILDING PROFILES MaryNell Nolan-Wheatley, Margaret Herman, Theresa Noonan, and Michael Caratzas ARCHITECTS’ APPENDIX COMPLIED BY Marianne S. Percival EDITED BY Kate Lemos McHale PHOTOGRAPHS BY Sarah Moses and Jessica Baldwin COMMISSIONERS Sarah Carroll, Chair Frederick Bland, Vice Chair Diana Chapin Wellington Chen Michael Devonshire Michael Goldblum John Gustafsson Anne Holford-Smith Jeanne Lutfy Adi Shamir-Baron LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION Lisa Kersavage, Executive Director Mark Silberman, General Counsel Kate Lemos McHale, Director of Research Cory Herrala, Director of Preservation Landmarks Preservation Designation Report Designation List 513 Commission Sunset Park South LP-2622 Historic District June 18, 2019 DESIGNATION REPORT Sunset Park South Historic District LOCATION Borough of Brooklyn LANDMARK TYPE Historic District SIGNIFICANCE Consisting almost entirely of two-story row houses built between 1892 and 1906, Sunset Park South is a remarkably cohesive historic district representing the largest collection of well-preserved row houses in Sunset Park, containing several of the neighborhood’s most distinctive streetscapes, and recalling Sunset Park’s origins and history as a middle-class community. Landmarks Preservation Designation Report Designation List 513 Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Representative SCS Landfill Closure Projects Facility Name State Size (Acres)
    Representative SCS Landfill Closure Projects Size State (acres) Facility Name Nabors Landfill, Class 4 and Areas 1-2, 1-3 AR 48 City of Oracle Page, Trowbridge Ranch Landfill Closure AZ 4 City of Tucson Los Reales Landfill, West Side Closure AZ 30 Navajo County, Lone Pine Landfill AZ 60 Pinal County, Page-Trowbridge Ranch Landfill AZ 3.2 Butte County, Neal Road Landfill CA 33 City of Auburn Landfill CA 20 City of Los Angeles Bishops Canyon Landfill CA 45 City of Modesto Carpenter Road Landfill, Partial Clean Closure CA 38 City of Riverside, Tequesquite Landfill CA 40 City of Sacramento Dellar Property Closure CA 28 County of Mercer Highway 59 Closure CA 88 Placer County Eastern Regional Landfill CA 3 Potrero Hills Landfill CA 150 Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority, Lewis Road Landfill CA 15 Sonoma Central Landfill, LF-1 Closure CA 85 Stanislaus County, Fink Road Landfill CA 18 West Contra Costa CA 60 Bayside Landfill, Closure FL 30 DeSoto County Landfill, Zone 1 FL 3 Escambia County Beulah Road Landfill FL 100 Glades County Landfill, Final Closure FL 7 Gulf Coast Landfill, Phase III Closure FL 15 Hillsborough County Pleasant Grove Class I Landfill FL 11 Immokalee Landfill, Closure FL 24 Lake County Lady Lake Landfill FL 2 Medley Landfill, Phases 1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4, 5 Closures FL 84 Monarch Hill Landfill, Phases 1-7 Closures FL 110 Naples Landfill, Naples, Phase 2 Closure FL 11 Okeechobee Landfill, Phases 1-5 Closures FL 98 Polk County North Central Class III Landfill FL 11 Royal Oaks Ranch, Titusville, Final Closure FL 30 SCMM Landfill, Phase 1 Closure FL 23 Volusia County Plymouth Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Reel-It-In-Brooklyn
    REEL IT IN! BROOKLYN Fish Consumption Education Project in Brooklyn ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This research and outreach project was developed by Going Coastal, Inc. Team members included Gabriel Rand, Zhennya Slootskin and Barbara La Rocco. Volunteers were vital to the execution of the project at every stage, including volunteers from Pace University’s Center for Community Action and Research, volunteer translators Inessa Slootskin, Annie Hongjuan and Bella Moharreri, and video producer Dave Roberts. We acknowledge support from Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz and funding from an Environmental Justice Research Impact Grant of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Photos by Zhennya Slootskin, Project Coordinator. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Study Area 3. Background 4. Methods 5. Results & Discussion 6. Conclusions 7. Outreach Appendix A: Survey List of Acronyms: CSO Combined Sewer Overflow DEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation DEP New York City Department of Environmental Protection DOH New York State Department of Health DPR New York City Department of Parks & Recreation EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency GNRA Gateway National Recreation Area NOAA National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency OPRHP New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation PCBs Polychlorinated biphenyls WIC Women, Infant and Children program Reel It In Brooklyn: Fish Consumption Education Project Page 2 of 68 Abstract Brooklyn is one of America’s largest and fastest growing multi‐ethnic coastal counties. All fish caught in the waters of New York Harbor are on mercury advisory. Brooklyn caught fish also contain PCBs, pesticides, heavy metals, many more contaminants. The waters surrounding Brooklyn serve as a source of recreation, transportation and, for some, food.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Management Final Exam
    WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Fall 2005 FW/ZO 353 FINAL EXAM Here is your final exam for FW/ZO 353, Wildlife Management. The base for your final grade will be determined by this exam (30%), and your 4 best quizzes (70%) modified by your pop-quizzes. INFORMATION Please read the questions carefully. Think about each question and do not answer questions too quickly. Relax, you have more than enough time for this exam, so take that time. Feel free to ask me questions. Before turning in your answer sheet, sit and relax for a few minutes and think about your answers, or just sit and relax. If you wish to explain your answers for certain questions more fully, feel free to turn in with your answer sheet a piece of paper with those explanations. Remember to put your name on that piece of paper. If you do not have a piece of paper, ask me for one. NAME On the computer answer sheet, please be certain to fill in your name circles, LAST NAME FIRST, so that the computer can generate an answer sheet for you. HONOR CODE North Carolina State University has an Honor Code that applies to this exam. If you acknowledge that you "have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this" exam, sign your name in the NAME space on the backside of your answer sheet. POSTING FINAL GRADE I shall submit grades electronically, with luck tonight. I am going to Saskatoon for 3 days for a small conference aimed at finding more bear-friendly ways to live-trap grizzly bears.
    [Show full text]