DOCSLIB.ORG

Representative SCS Landfill Closure Projects Facility Name State Size (Acres)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Representative SCS Landfill Closure Projects Facility Name State Size (Acres) Representative SCS Landfill Closure Projects Size State (acres) Facility Name Nabors Landfill, Class 4 and Areas 1-2, 1-3 AR 48 City of Oracle Page, Trowbridge Ranch Landfill Closure AZ 4 City of Tucson Los Reales Landfill, West Side Closure AZ 30 Navajo County, Lone Pine Landfill AZ 60 Pinal County, Page-Trowbridge Ranch Landfill AZ 3.2 Butte County, Neal Road Landfill CA 33 City of Auburn Landfill CA 20 City of Los Angeles Bishops Canyon Landfill CA 45 City of Modesto Carpenter Road Landfill, Partial Clean Closure CA 38 City of Riverside, Tequesquite Landfill CA 40 City of Sacramento Dellar Property Closure CA 28 County of Mercer Highway 59 Closure CA 88 Placer County Eastern Regional Landfill CA 3 Potrero Hills Landfill CA 150 Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority, Lewis Road Landfill CA 15 Sonoma Central Landfill, LF-1 Closure CA 85 Stanislaus County, Fink Road Landfill CA 18 West Contra Costa CA 60 Bayside Landfill, Closure FL 30 DeSoto County Landfill, Zone 1 FL 3 Escambia County Beulah Road Landfill FL 100 Glades County Landfill, Final Closure FL 7 Gulf Coast Landfill, Phase III Closure FL 15 Hillsborough County Pleasant Grove Class I Landfill FL 11 Immokalee Landfill, Closure FL 24 Lake County Lady Lake Landfill FL 2 Medley Landfill, Phases 1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4, 5 Closures FL 84 Monarch Hill Landfill, Phases 1-7 Closures FL 110 Naples Landfill, Naples, Phase 2 Closure FL 11 Okeechobee Landfill, Phases 1-5 Closures FL 98 Polk County North Central Class III Landfill FL 11 Royal Oaks Ranch, Titusville, Final Closure FL 30 SCMM Landfill, Phase 1 Closure FL 23 Volusia County Plymouth Ave. Class I Landfill FL 41 Wheelabrator Ash Monofill, Davie, Temporary Closure FL 7.6 Swift Creek Landfill GA 31 IPL 6th Street Generation Station, CCR Pond Closure IA 10 IPL Lansing CCR Landfill, Phase 1 and Phase 2 Final Cover IA 6 IPL M.L. Kapp, CCR Pond Closure IA 28 Southern Idaho Regional Solid Waste District, Milner Butte ID 8.5 Landfill – Side Slope Closure Reno County Landfill, Site A C&D Unit KS 26 Frederick County, Reichs Ford Road Landfill MD 14 Harford County, Spencer’s Landfill MD 21 Howard County, Carrs Mill Landfill MD 10 Howard County, New Cut Landfill MD 40 Howard County, Alpha Ridge Landfill MD 70 Montgomery County, Oaks Landfill MD 130 Prince Georges County, Cross Trails Rubble Landfill MD 85 Regional Waste System Balefills ME 40 Omaha Public Power District, North Omaha Station CCR Landfill NE 5 City of Las Vegas, Sunrise Mountain Landfill NV 800 City of New York Edgemere Landfill NY 150 City of New York Fountain Avenue Landfill NY 280 City of New York Fresh Kills Landfill, Sections 1/9, 2/8, 3/4 NY 515 City of New York Pennsylvania Avenue Landfill NY 90 Sullivan County Landfill NY 28 Town of Riverhead Landfill NY 30 City of Oxford Sanitary Landfill OH 25 Department of Energy (DOE) Facilities, X-749 and X-749A, OH 12 Portsmouth Gas Diffusion Plant 51st Street Landfill OK 9.1 American Environmental Landfill OK 47 Clinton Lewis Construction Company Landfill OK 12 Southern Oklahoma Regional Disposal Landfill OK 76 Berkeley County Landfill SC 10 Lee County Landfill SC 35 Austin Community Landfill, East and West Hills TX 26 City of Nacogdoches Landfill, Block M Closure TX 19 City of Waco 1419 Landfill TX .5 Lacy Lakeview Landfill TX 14 Seabreeze Environmental Landfill, Sectors 1 and 2 TX 120 Williamson County Landfill, Phase 1, North and West Final Cover TX 6 Accomack County, Northern and Southern Landfills VA 40 Battle Creek Landfill VA 5 Bedford County Landfill VA Campbell County Landfill VA Fluvanna County Landfill VA Frederick County Landfill VA 18 Hilltop Landfill VA 6 King George County Landfill VA Page County Battle Creek Landfill, Phase I Closure VA 5 Prince William Landfill VA 28 Shoosmith Brothers Landfill VA Virginia Beach Landfill VA LRI Landfill, Phase III Closure WA 7.2 Wisconsin Power and Light, Columbia CCR Landfill WI 6 Wisconsin Power and Light, I-43/Edgewater CCR Landfill, WI 6 Phase 3 Module 1 and Phase 4 Module 1 Final Cover Wisconsin Power and Light, Nelson Dewey CCR Ash Pond Closure WI 29 Wisconsin Power and Light, Rock River CCR Landfill/Ponds WI 15 Comox Valley Regional District, Campbell River Landfill, Phase 1 BC 1.5 Closure (Canada) BC 22 City of Vancouver, Vancouver Landfill, Phase 2 Closure (Canada) Hiriya Landfill Israel 100 Novo Gramacho, LF Brazil 400 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment to 2005—SIR 2007–5051 Prepared in Cooperation with the National Park Service
    Benotti, Abbene, & Terracciano—Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment to 2005—SIR 2007–5051 Long Island, New York: Loading in Jamaica Bay, Benotti, Abbene, & Terracciano—Nitrogen Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment to 2005 Scientifi c Investigations Report 2007–5051 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment to 2005 By Mark J. Benotti, Michele Abbene, and Stephen A. Terracciano Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5051 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Benotti, M.J., Abbene, Michele., and Terracciano, S.A., 2007, Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment
    [Show full text]
  • The Creeks, Beaches, and Bay of the Jamaica Bay Estuary: the Importance of Place in Cultivating Relationships to Nature
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2012 The Creeks, Beaches, and Bay of the Jamaica Bay Estuary: The Importance of Place in Cultivating Relationships to Nature Kristen L. Van Hooreweghe Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1815 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Creeks, Beaches, and Bay of the Jamaica Bay Estuary: The Importance of Place in Cultivating Relationships to Nature by Kristen L. Van Hooreweghe A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2012 © 2012 Kristen L. Van Hooreweghe All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. William Kornblum _______________ ______________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee John Torpey ______________ ______________________________________________ Date Executive Officer William Kornblum Kenneth Gould Hester Eisenstein Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract The Creeks, Beaches, and Bay of the Jamaica Bay Estuary: The Importance of Place in Cultivating Relationships to Nature by Kristen L. Van Hooreweghe Adviser: Professor William Kornblum It is often assumed that people living in urban areas lack connections to the natural world and are the source of environmental problems.
    [Show full text]
  • HEP Habitat Status Report 2001.Pdf
    New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program Habitat Workgroup ;1 regional partnership of federal, state, interstate, and local agencies, citizens, and scientists working together to protect and restore the habitat and living resources of the estuary, its tributaries, and the New York/Nc•F]ersey Bight City of New York/Parks & Recreation Natural Resources Group Rudolph W. Giuliani, Maym Henry J. Stem, Commissioner Marc A. Matsil, Chief, Natllfal Resources Group Chair, Habitat Workgroup, NY/NJ Harbor Estuary Program Status Report Sponsors National Pish and Wildlife Foundation City of New York/Parks & Recreation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey City Parks Foundation HydroQual, Inc. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Lawler, Matusky & Skelly Engineers, LLP This document is approved by the New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Prowam Policr Committee. The Policy Committee's membership includes the U.S. linvironmental Protection !lgency, U.S. ,lrmr Corps of!ingineers, New York State Department of nnvimnmental Conservation, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New York Local Government Representative (New York C'i~1· Dep;~rtment of Enl'imnmentnl Protection), Newjcrsey lJ>enl Government Rcpresentati1·e (Newark V?atershed Conservation and De,·elopment Corporation), and a Rcprcsent;JtiFe of the Citizens/Scientific and Technical Advisory Committees. Funds for this project were pnwided through settlement funds from the National Pish and \Vildlif(: Foundation. April 2001 Cover: Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis). North Brother Island. Bronx Opposite: Pelham Bay Park, Bronx New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program Habitat Workgroup 2001 Status Report Table of Contents 4 Introduction 8 Section 1: Acquisition and Restoration Priorities 9 I.
    [Show full text]
  • FAR ROCKAWAY QUEENS Neighborhood Arts and Cultural Inventory
    FAR ROCKAWAY QUEENS Neighborhood Arts and Cultural Inventory Rockaway Waterfront Alliance in Rockaway Artists Alliance partnership with Far Rockaway Arverne Nonprofit Coalition BUILDING NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY BACKGROUND CAPACITY The Rockaway Peninsula is a New York City Building Community gem with over 25 miles of shoreline. Situated Capacity (BCC), takes between the Atlantic Ocean and Jamaica a collaborative and Bay in southeast Queens, the eastern end comprehensive approach encompasses seven neighborhoods—Far to building cultural capacity Rockaway, Bayswater, Wave Crest, Edgemere, in targeted low-income Arverne, Hammels, and Rockaway Beach—and neighborhoods. This multi- is home to an estimated 93,000 individuals. It is year program strives to a diverse community, racially, culturally, and in ensure both that culture its urban form. About 44% of residents identify is included as part of the as Black/African American, 27% as Latino/ City’s interagency efforts Hispanic, and 22% as White. Communities around neighborhood from the Caribbean, Central America, Eastern planning, affordable Europe, and Africa are nestled in with earlier housing, and economic settlers from Ireland, Italy, and the American development; and that South. The urban character is composed of local cultural stakeholders inner city and suburban elements. High- and have ownership and voice low-rise towers and elevated subway tracks in their own community’s are intermingled with one- and two-family development efforts. homes and expansive beaches. This melding IN THIS REPORT is reflective of the area’s history as a summer The research data and resort and as site to Robert Moses’ ambitious analysis outlined in the top-down planning. following sections express This part of the Rockaway Peninsula is home to the voices of 523 Far a growing arts and cultural community.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Southern Brooklyn Transportation Investment Study Kings County, New York P.I.N. X804.00; D007406 Technical Memorandum #2 Existing Conditions DRAFT June 2003 Submitted to: New York Metropolitan Transportation Council Submitted by: Parsons Brinckerhoff In association with: Cambridge Systematics, Inc. SIMCO Engineering, P.C. Urbitran Associates, Inc. Zetlin Strategic Communications TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... ES-1 A. TRANSIT SYSTEM USAGE AND OPERATION.................................................................. ES-1 B. GOODS MOVEMENT...................................................................................................... ES-2 C. SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS ..................................................................................... ES-4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .................................................................................... ES-5 E. ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY.............................................................................................. ES-5 F. PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION.................................................................... ES-6 CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................I-1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................I-1 B. PROJECT OVERVIEW..........................................................................................................I-1
    [Show full text]
  • Jamaica Bay Watershed Protection Plan Volume I – Regional Profile New York City Department of Environmental Protection Emily Lloyd, Commissioner October 1, 2007
    Jamaica Bay Watershed Protection Plan Volume I – Regional Profile New York City Department of Environmental Protection Emily Lloyd, Commissioner October 1, 2007 Volume 1: Jamaica Bay Watershed Protection Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................iii Chapter 1 - Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE VALUE OF JAMAICA BAY .............................................................................................. 1 1.2 IS JAMAICA BAY LIKE CENTRAL PARK?........................................................................... 3 1.3 LOCAL LAW 71 AND INTRODUCTION 376 .......................................................................... 4 1.4 ORGANIZATION OF THIS PLAN ............................................................................................ 5 Chapter 2 - Jamaica Bay and Its Watershed: Landscape and Setting............................................. 7 2.1 JAMAICA BAY ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 HISTORICAL SETTING ............................................................................................................. 8 2.3 GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING.................................................................................................... 15 2.4 CLIMATOLOGICAL SETTING .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Kills Dumped : a Policy Assessment for the Management Of
    Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Please Note: The author retains the copyright while the New Jersey Institute of Technology reserves the right to distribute this thesis or dissertation Printing note: If you do not wish to print this page, then select “Pages from: first page # to: last page #” on the print dialog screen The Van Houten library has removed some of the personal information and all signatures from the approval page and biographical sketches of theses and dissertations in order to protect the identity of NJIT graduates and faculty. ASAC ES KIS UME: A OICY ASSESSME O E MAAGEME O EW YOK CIYS ESIEIA SOI WASE I E WEYIS CEUY b Arn Wll Crv New York City ceased disposing of its daily residential solid waste output within its municipal borders in March 2001 when the Department of Sanitation completed its phase-down of the Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island.
    [Show full text]
  • To Love a Landfill
    TO LOVE A LANDFILL DIRT AND THE ENVIRONMENT 176 Dirt Book Chapter 177 The landfill can be understood as a social space where discarded material is collected and contained, but also where cultural meaning may accrue and human relationships may be forged or understood. The idea of the landfill as a common, socially meaningful, space is by no means a recent proposition. In 1850, the minor English poet and critic Richard Hengist Horne wrote a vivid and sensitive study of the community surrounding the Great Dust Heap at Gray’s Inn Road in London in his ‘Dust, or Ugliness Redeemed’, reproduced here in an abridged form. Those same themes of community, value and meaning in the landfill are taken up more than 150 years later by the US anthropologist Robin Nagle in her discussion of the relationship between the city dump and the community it sustains. Taken together, these two texts reflect our ambivalent relationship with the idea of the landfill, as both a shared repository for waste and a place of shared social significance. 178 Dirt last week, he had covered neatly with an oyster-shell, which was kept in its place by DUST; OR a string at each side, fastened through a hole. He used no sta# to help him along, though his body was nearly bent double, so that his face was constantly turned to the UGLINESS REDEEMED earth, like that of a four-footed creature. He was ninety-seven years of age. As these two patriarchal labourers approached the great Dust-heap, a discordant R. H.
    [Show full text]
  • Planyc 2011 Parks.Pdf
    Parks and Public Space Parks and Public Space Credit: Iwan Baan Together we can Target high impact projects in neighborhoods underserved by parks Create destination-level spaces for all types of recreation Re-imagine the public realm Promote and protect nature Ensure the long-term health of parks and public space Parks range from the simplest form for kids I think the playground [we designed] is great for to the most complex form like wetlands that little kids, teenagers, and senior citizens. I even have wildlife and rare species. You have saw my grandma reading at the playground. That constituencies that can enjoy all of these, makes me feel very happy to see people enjoying and it’s right here in our community. the school’s playground. Alex Zablocki // Staten Island Samantha Brito // Queens The New York Harbor is an untapped resource for New York’s creative community and their families. Over the past two summers, we’ve been fortunate to be able to host outdoor sporting challenges on the grassy lawns of Governors Island and engage I felt excited to help in the playground [design]. New Yorkers through a healthy series of activities. We are the ones who planned out the whole These public playgrounds enable us to keep our thing. People love this playground. I can tell sanity amidst all the chaos and hustle and bustle by a lot of people coming to the playground. of living in the city. Seana Edwin // Queens Khairi Mdnor // Manhattan A GREENER, GREATER NEW YORK PLANYC 33 Parks and Public Space For generations, parks have been among New including the historic investment in parks and Ensure all York’s most cherished forms of public infrastruc- public spaces made in 2007, heralded by the New Yorkers ture.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Urban Field Station 2016 Annual Progress Report
    New York City Urban Field Station 2016 Annual Progress Report The New York City Urban Field Station improves the quality of life in urban areas by conducting, communicating, and supporting research about socio-ecological systems and natural resource management. The NYC Urban Field Station (NYC UFS) is both a physical place to conduct research and a network of relationships among scientists, land managers, designers, practitioners, artists, other professionals, and community members that facilitates discussion and science on urban ecology. The NYC UFS is sustained through a core partnership between the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USDA FS) Northern Research Station, the NYC Department of Parks & Recreation (NYC Parks), and the non-profit Natural Areas Conservancy (NAC). Since its founding in 2006, the NYC UFS has actively collaborated with non-profit, academic, local stewardship, and government partners to support urban land management and sustainability initiatives in New York City through innovative and stakeholder-driven research in action. 2016: Cultivating Stewardship in New York City and Beyond The U.S. Forest Service was created in 1905, at a time when the U.S. population was 80% rural, for the purpose of restoring degraded landscapes and watersheds that had been affected by irresponsible logging practices. This purpose was translated into a mission “[t]o sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation's forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations." The Forest Service has always been a conservation agency engaged in restoration and stewardship activities. Today, as the U.S. population is over 80% urban, we find that urban landscapes are in need of the same stewardship and restoration, and our calling to care for the land and serve the people applies just as strongly in urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Representative List of SCS Engineers Landfill Closure Projects Location and Facility Name State Approx. Size (Acres) City Of
    Representative List of SCS Engineers Landfill Closure Projects Approx. Size Location and Facility Name State (acres) City of Oracle Page-Trowbridge Ranch Landfill Closure AZ 4 City of Tucson Los Reales Landfill West Side Closure AZ 30 Navajo County, Lone Pine Landfill AZ 60 Pinal County, Page-Trowbridge Ranch Landfill AZ 3.2 City of Los Angeles Bishops Canyon Landfill CA 45 Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority Lewis Road Landfill CA 15 Butte County, Neal Road Landfill CA 33 Norcal, City of Auburn Landfill CA 20 Stanislaus County, Fink Road Landfill CA 18 City of Riverside, Tequesquite Landfill CA 40 Republic Services, Inc., Potrero Hills Landfill CA 150 Republic Services, Inc., West Contra Costa CA 60 DeSoto County Landfill, Zone 1 FL 3 Escambia County Beulah Road Landfill FL 100 Hillsborough County Pleasant Grove Class I Landfill FL 11 Lake County Lady Lake Landfill FL 32 Polk County North Central Class III Landfill FL 11 Volusia County Plymouth Ave. Class I Landfill FL 41 Bayside Landfill, Miami, Closure FL 30 Glades County Landfill, Moore Haven, Closure FL 7 Gulf Coast Landfill, Gulf Coast, Phase III Closure FL 15 Immokalee Landfill, Immokalee, Closure FL 24 SCMM, Hillsboro Co., Phase 1 Closure FL 23 Medley Landfill, Phases 1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4 and Temp Closures FL 66 Monarch Hill Landfill, Phases 1-6 Closures FL 83 Naples Landfill, Naples, Phase 2 Closure FL 11 Okeechobee Landfill, Phases 1-5 and Temp Closures FL 98 Royal Oaks Ranch, Titusville, Closure FL 30 Wheelabrator Ash Monofill, Davie, Temporary Closure FL 7.6 Swift Creek Landfill
    [Show full text]