DOCSLIB.ORG

Aldo Starker Leopold

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aldo Starker Leopold Aldo Starker Leopold : wildlife biologist and public policy maker by Carol Henrietta Leigh Rydell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Montana State University © Copyright by Carol Henrietta Leigh Rydell (1993) Abstract: Aldo Starker Leopold (1913-1983), the eldest son of conservationist Aldo Leopold (1887-1948), played during his life, a crucial role in forming wildlife management policy at both state and federal levels; Trained as a zoologist at the University of California in Berkeley, Leopold spent his early years as a wildlife biologist working on such issues as heritable wildness in turkeys and cataloging the wildlife of Mexico. From his position as professor of zoology at the University of California in Berkeley, however, he quickly became embroiled in wildlife controversies with policy implications. In the late 1940s and throughout the 1950s, for example, Leopold worked on deer management issues with California's Fish and Game Department. In 1962 then Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall appointed Leopold to head a special advisory board on wildlife management. As chairman of that board, Leopold authored at least three important reports on wildlife management in the National Parks, predator and rodent control and the national wildlife system. By the end of the 1960s, Leopold had carved a niche in wildlife management circles separate from his father's. This thesis is an intellectual biography of Aldo Starker Leopold. It is based on research into his published and unpublished writings and his personal papers. ALDO STARKER LEOPOLD WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST AND PUBLIC POLICY MAKER . by Carol Henrietta Leigh Rydell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 1993 COPYRIGHT by Carol Henrietta Leigh Rydell 1993 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Carol Henrietta Leigh Rydell This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the College of Graduate Studies. Date Chairperson, Graduate Committee Approved for the Major Department Approved for the College of Graduate Studies /7 ^ D Date Graduate Dean iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copying is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with "fair use" as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Signature (2^ (lh. ^ Date Z f p p r) 9 2 _________ iv To Alexander and Henrietta Leigh, and Bob, Claire and Johanna Rydell V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the help of numerous individuals and institutions. I am grateful to the Department of History and Philosophy at Montana State University for underwriting many of my research expenses. I also wish to thank the library staff at the Bancroft Library and the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at the University of California, Berkeley. This project took much longer than expected. During the five years it took to finish the thesis Professors Pierce Mullen, Gordon Brittan and Billy Smith gave me support and encouragement but most of all time and space to do things at my own pace. I am very grateful to them for this. Nina Leopold Bradley spent an afternoon with me talking about her brother, and provided me with a copy of the Sierra Club Oral History of Starker Leopold. I am grateful to.her for trusting me with the story of someone she loved very much. I also wish to thank her husband, Charles Bradley, and his daughter, Dorothy Bradley, for their patience and encouragement. Professor A. Hunter Dupree read my thesis and shared his memories of Starker. Richard Wojtowicz generously and patiently helped with the computer. Claire and Johanna Rydell let their mother go upstairs to work on her thesis. In their own small ways they supported my work. Most of my gratitude, however. vi they supported my. work. Most of my gratitude, however, goes to my husband, Bob Rydell, who encouraged me at every step of the way. He read this thesis and never stopped believing in the project and me. V vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION.......... I 1. THE APPRENTICESHIP YEARS...............................7 2. ENTERING THE FRAY: STARKER LEOPOLD AND THE WILDLIFE CONTROVERSIES OF THE 195OS... ....................... 64 3. FROM SCIENTIST TO PUBLIC POLICY MAKER....... .........145 4. THE 1960S AS THE DECADE OF PUBLIC POLICY WORK: THE NATIONAL PARKS............................ 175 5. THE 1960S AS THE DECADE OF PUBLIC POLICY WORK: PREDATOR CONTROL AND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES... ..236 6. THE 1970S AND 1980S: LEOPOLD'S FINAL YEARS......... 281 viii A ABSTRACT Aldo Starker Leopold (1913-1983), the eldest son of conservationist Aldo Leopold (1887-1948), played during his life, a crucial role in forming wildlife management policy at both state and federal levels t Trained as a zoologist at the University of California in Berkeley, Leopold spent his early years as a wildlife biologist working on such issues as heritable wildness in turkeys and cataloging the wildlife of Mexico. From his position as professor of zoology at the University of California in Berkeley, however, he quickly became embroiled in wildlife controversies with policy implications. In the late 1940s and throughout the 1950s, for example, Leopold worked on deer management issues with California's Fish and Game Department. In 1962 then Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall appointed Leopold to head a special advisory board on wildlife management. As chairman of that board, Leopold authored at least three important reports on wildlife management in the National Parks, predator and rodent control and the national wildlife system. By the end of the 1960s, Leopold had carved a niche in wildlife management circles separate from his father's. This thesis is an intellectual biography of Aldo Starker Leopold. It is based on research into his published and unpublished writings and his personal papers. I r I INTRODUCTION In conservation circles the name Aldo Leopold calls forth more,than the image of a poetic observer of woodcocks gracefully performing their annual spring dance, of oak trees marking time and keeping track of history in their wood, and of the sandy but intellectually fertile counties of Wisconsin. The name signifies the very essence of conservation, of conserving a balance in nature by living in accordance with a land ethic. Aldo Leopold (1887-1948) was one of America's foremost conservationists; he was a proponent of scientific wildlife management and of wilderness preservation. Leopold's importance in American conservation and environmental history has done nothing but grow since his untimely death in 1948. Born in Burlington, Iowa and trained at the School of Forestry at Yale, Leopold began his career as a forester working in the Southwest. It was in the fragile ecosystems of the southwestern deserts that Leopold first toyed with ideas about the delicate balance in nature between the land and its inhabitants, and there that he first realized the need for sound wildlife management practices and wilderness preservation. These ideas, so crucial to the birth of the environmental and wilderness 2 movements of the second half of the twentieth century, were further developed and refined by Leopold as he moved from the Southwest to the sandy counties surrounding Madison, Wisconsin. There he shifted his intellectual focus from the field of forestry to game— or as it is now known, wildlife— management. Leopold came into the conservation movement on the heels of forester Gifford Pinchot and preservationist John Muir. Their turn-of-the-century ideas regarding the development of America's wild lands and natural resources— Gifford Pinchot's "wise use" doctrine and John Muir's spiritual plea for resource preservation— were competing for influence when Leopold entered the picture. Leopold's scientific ideas about land and wildlife management and his philosophy of living in ecologic balance with nature provided the synthesis of these antithetical beliefs. His scientific and philosophic ideas found their final expression in the collection of essays he is best remembered for, his posthumously published A Sand County Almanac (1949). Historians and philosophers are still trying to define and describe the contours of Aldo Leopold's legacy in the areas of wildlife management, wilderness preservation, and environmental philosophy. One important facet of his legacy which has not been fully appreciated is his family. Leopold and his. wife of Spanish and 3 Italian descent, (Maria Alvira) Estella Bergere, had five children, all of whom have become expert naturalists and prominent figures in their respective scientific fields. Four members of the Leopold family became professional scientists— Aldo Starker became a zoologist, Luna Bergere a hydrologist, Aldo Carl a plant physiologist, and Estella Bergere a paleobotanist— while the fifth, Nina Leopold Bradley, is Co-Director of Research at the Leopold Memorial Reserve and is doing"important research of her own on prairie restoration. Three of these Leopold-family scientists have been elected to the National Academy of Sciences.1 Gifted observers of nature like their father, Aldo1s children have also taken up his torch of environmental and public policy activism. This study is concerned with the intellectual biography of one of Aide's children— Aldo Starker Leopold. When Aldo Leopold, died in 1948, his son, Aldo Starker Leopold, stood poised to take up where his father left off.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Science Board, Staff, Divisional Committees And
    . APPENDIX I NATIONALSCIENCEBOARD, STAFF, D~VISIONALCOMMMTEESAND ADVISORY PANELS NATIONALSCIENCEBOARD Terms Expire May lo,1956 JOHN W. DAVIS, President (ret.), West Virginia State College, Englewood, N. J. EDWIN B. FRED, President, the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. hJRENCE M. GOULD, President, Carleton College, Northfield, Minn. PAUL M. GROSS: Vice President and Dean of Duke University, Duke University, Durham, N. C. GEORGE D. HUMPHREY, President, the University of Wyoming, Laramie, wyo. 0. W. HYMAN, Vice President, the University of Tennessee, Memphis, Term. FREDERICK A. MIDDLEBUSH,~ President Emeritus, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. EARL P. STJWENSON,~ President, Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, Mass. Terms Expire May lo,1958 SOPHIE D. ABERLE,~ Special Research Director, the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, N. Mex. CHESTER I. BARN~,~ Chairman of the Board, President (ret.), Rocke- feller Foundation, New York, N. Y. ROBERT P. BARNES, Professor of Chemistry, Howard University, Washing- ton, D. C. DETLEV W. BRONIC,~ Vice Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee, President, National Academy of Sciences, Wash- ington, D. C., and President, Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York, N. Y. GERTY T. Coar, Professor of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO. CHARLES DOLLARD, President, Carnegie Corp. of New York, New York, N. Y. ROBERT F. LOEB,~ Bard Professor of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, N. Y. ANDREY A. POTTER, Dean Emeritus of Engineering, Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind. Terms Expire May 10, 1960 RWER ADAMS, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana, Ill. 60 FOURTE ANNUAL REPORT 61 THEODORE M.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Act and Howard Zahniser
    WILDERNESS ACT AND HOWARD ZAHNISER In: The Fully Managed, Multiple-Use Forest Era, 1960-1970 Passage of the Wilderness Act of 1964 involved decades of work on the part of many people both inside the Forest Service and from a variety of interest groups. As early as the 1910’s and 1920’s, there were several important proponents of wilderness designation in the national forests. Three men are considered pivotal in these early years and all were Forest Service employees: Aldo Leopold, Arthur H. Carhart, and Robert Marshall. Their efforts were successful at the local level in creating administratively designated wilderness protection for several areas across the country. At the national policy level, there was a series of policy decisions (L-20 and U Regulations) in the 1920’s and 1930’s that made wilderness and primitive area designation relatively easy, but what was lacking was a common standard of management across the country for these areas. Also, since these wilderness and primitive areas were administratively designated, the next Chief or Regional Forester could “undesignate” any of the areas with the stroke of a pen. Howard C. Zahniser, executive secretary of the Wilderness Society (founded by Bob Marshall), became the leader in a movement for congressionally designated wilderness areas. In 1949, Zahniser detailed his proposal for Federal wilderness legislation in which Congress would establish a national wilderness system, identify appropriate areas, prohibit incompatible uses, list potential new areas, and authorize a commission to recommend changes to the program. Nothing much happened to the proposal, but it did raise the awareness for the need to protect wilderness and primitive areas from all forms of development.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Ethic Observe • Participate • Reflect Leaders Join Us for a Special Land Ethic Leaders Program! November 14 - 16, 2016 at the Watershed Center (Springfield, MO)
    Land Ethic Observe • Participate • Reflect Leaders Join us for a special Land Ethic Leaders program! November 14 - 16, 2016 at the Watershed Center (Springfield, MO) Presented in partnership between the Aldo Leopold Foundation and the Watershed Committee of the Ozarks. What is Land Ethic Leaders? In A Sand County Almanac, Aldo Leopold set forth his most enduring idea, the “land ethic,” a moral responsibility of humans to the natural world. Aldo Leopold’s land ethic idea is extremely relevant in today’s society, but it can be difficult to define, discuss, and implement. To even begin that monumental task, we need leaders who are deeply committed to rolling up their sleeves and building a land ethic at the grassroots level in communities everywhere. The workshop uses the land ethic as a powerful platform for helping leaders learn to facilitate dialog about the meaning and value of conservation in today’s world. Our “Observe, Participate, Reflect” framework is based in Leopold’s own method of helping lead his family and students in the process of developing their personal land ethic. During the two and a half day training, 20-30 participants explore and deepen their own land ethic together through outdoor observation, environmental service, and reflective discussions. Activities are largely planned and facilitated by members of the group. Afterwards, participants walk away with new relationships, tools, and ideas to inspire creative ways to bring the land ethic back home. Why You Should Attend Environmental conservation work can be gratifying, but it can also be emotionally draining as we grapple daily with tough questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk on Yellowstone's Northern Range: Science, Management, and Controversy, 1900- 1980
    Elk on Yellowstone's Northern Range: Science, Management, and Controversy, 1900- 1980 by James Pritchard Revised Aug. 29. 1994 Not for Quotation James Pritchard 1207 N.Hyland Ave. Ames, IA 50014 515-292-9145 From its inception in 1872, Yellowstone National Park protected elk against hunters, but in the early 1930s scientists and managers began to think that too many elk damaged vegetation on the range and initiated efforts to control the number of elk. especially the herd which roamed the northern reaches of the Park in the drainages of the Lamar and Yellowstone Rivers. In 1934 Yellowstone rangers began shooting the elk of the northern herd to directly control their numbers. In 1967, after years of controversy, Yellowstone stopped using direct reduction, and shortly thereafter, ceased live-trapping and shipment of elk as well. For the historian, that policy shift stimulates the formation of several questions. Why did Yellowstone initiate this change in wildlife management policy? In what ways did science inform this decision, and how did management imperatives shape the opportunities for science? Why did Yellowstone's policy on range management and ungulates differ from that on the public lands of the Gallatin National Forest just to the north? This paper seeks to demonstrate that management strategies of for ungulate management were shaped by biologists and managers who conceived of Yellowstone as an exemplar and preserve of nature. The officials who regulated the elk hunt in iMontana had a very different set of priorities. The perceptions of urban visitors as well as elk hunters regarding nature and the purpose of Yellowstone also had an important influence in the form of political pressure on management decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • A WILDERNESS-FOREVER FUTURE a Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System
    A WILDERNESS-FOREVER FUTURE A Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System A PEW WILDERNESS CENTER RESEARCH REPORT A WILDERNESS-FOREVER FUTURE A Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System DOUGLAS W. SCOTT Here is an American wilderness vision: the vision of “a wilderness- forever future.” This is not my phrase, it is Howard Zahniser’s. And it is not my vision, but the one that I inherited, and that you, too, have inherited, from the wilderness leaders who went before. A Wilderness-Forever Future. Think about that. It is It is a hazard in a movement such as ours that the core idea bound up in the Wilderness Act, which newer recruits, as we all once were, may know too holds out the promise of “an enduring resource of little about the wilderness work of earlier generations. wilderness.” It is the idea of saving wilderness forever Knowing something of the history of wilderness —in perpetuity. preservation—nationally and in your own state— is important for effective wilderness advocacy. In Perpetuity. Think of the boldness of that ambition! As Zahniser said: “The wilderness that has come to us The history of our wilderness movement and the char- from the eternity of the past we have the boldness to acter and methods of those who pioneered the work project into the eternity of the future.”1 we continue today offer powerful practical lessons. The ideas earlier leaders nurtured and the practical tools Today this goal may seem obvious and worthy, but and skills they developed are what have brought our the goal of preserving American wilderness in per- movement to its present state of achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Management Final Exam
    WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Fall 2005 FW/ZO 353 FINAL EXAM Here is your final exam for FW/ZO 353, Wildlife Management. The base for your final grade will be determined by this exam (30%), and your 4 best quizzes (70%) modified by your pop-quizzes. INFORMATION Please read the questions carefully. Think about each question and do not answer questions too quickly. Relax, you have more than enough time for this exam, so take that time. Feel free to ask me questions. Before turning in your answer sheet, sit and relax for a few minutes and think about your answers, or just sit and relax. If you wish to explain your answers for certain questions more fully, feel free to turn in with your answer sheet a piece of paper with those explanations. Remember to put your name on that piece of paper. If you do not have a piece of paper, ask me for one. NAME On the computer answer sheet, please be certain to fill in your name circles, LAST NAME FIRST, so that the computer can generate an answer sheet for you. HONOR CODE North Carolina State University has an Honor Code that applies to this exam. If you acknowledge that you "have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this" exam, sign your name in the NAME space on the backside of your answer sheet. POSTING FINAL GRADE I shall submit grades electronically, with luck tonight. I am going to Saskatoon for 3 days for a small conference aimed at finding more bear-friendly ways to live-trap grizzly bears.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Crown: a Century of Resource Management in Glacier National Park
    Protecting the Crown A Century of Resource Management in Glacier National Park Rocky Mountains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (RM-CESU) RM-CESU Cooperative Agreement H2380040001 (WASO) RM-CESU Task Agreement J1434080053 Theodore Catton, Principal Investigator University of Montana Department of History Missoula, Montana 59812 Diane Krahe, Researcher University of Montana Department of History Missoula, Montana 59812 Deirdre K. Shaw NPS Key Official and Curator Glacier National Park West Glacier, Montana 59936 June 2011 Table of Contents List of Maps and Photographs v Introduction: Protecting the Crown 1 Chapter 1: A Homeland and a Frontier 5 Chapter 2: A Reservoir of Nature 23 Chapter 3: A Complete Sanctuary 57 Chapter 4: A Vignette of Primitive America 103 Chapter 5: A Sustainable Ecosystem 179 Conclusion: Preserving Different Natures 245 Bibliography 249 Index 261 List of Maps and Photographs MAPS Glacier National Park 22 Threats to Glacier National Park 168 PHOTOGRAPHS Cover - hikers going to Grinnell Glacier, 1930s, HPC 001581 Introduction – Three buses on Going-to-the-Sun Road, 1937, GNPA 11829 1 1.1 Two Cultural Legacies – McDonald family, GNPA 64 5 1.2 Indian Use and Occupancy – unidentified couple by lake, GNPA 24 7 1.3 Scientific Exploration – George B. Grinnell, Web 12 1.4 New Forms of Resource Use – group with stringer of fish, GNPA 551 14 2.1 A Foundation in Law – ranger at check station, GNPA 2874 23 2.2 An Emphasis on Law Enforcement – two park employees on hotel porch, 1915 HPC 001037 25 2.3 Stocking the Park – men with dead mountain lions, GNPA 9199 31 2.4 Balancing Preservation and Use – road-building contractors, 1924, GNPA 304 40 2.5 Forest Protection – Half Moon Fire, 1929, GNPA 11818 45 2.6 Properties on Lake McDonald – cabin in Apgar, Web 54 3.1 A Background of Construction – gas shovel, GTSR, 1937, GNPA 11647 57 3.2 Wildlife Studies in the 1930s – George M.
    [Show full text]
  • Union County Glacier
    In Memory of Luna B. Leopold e c n e i c S y r a t e n a l P 1915–2006 & h t r a E f o . t p e D y e l e k r e B C U y s e t r u o c o t o h P una Leopold, professor emeritus at the University of Cali- 1972 to 1986 he held the position of professor of earth and plane- fornia, Berkeley, and former chief hydrologist of the U.S. tary science and of landscape architecture at the University of Cal- LGeological Survey died at his home in Berkeley on February ifornia, Berkeley. “He made crucial discoveries about the nature of 23, 2006. The son of conservationist Aldo Leopold, Luna Leopold rivers, especially their remarkable regularity,” William Dietrich, a became widely recognized as one of our country’s most distin- UC Berkeley colleague of Leopold’s and professor of earth and guished earth scientists and will be remembered for his pioneer- planetary science, said in a news release. “He showed that this ing studies of rivers and fluvial geomorphology and for his tire- regularity of form applies to all rivers, whether they are in sand less work toward protecting and restoring rivers, water resources, boxes or draining entire continents, at scales of a laboratory flume and the environment. or the Gulf Stream.” Luna Leopold was born in Albuquerque. His father, Aldo During his time with the U.S. Geological Survey Leopold was Leopold, was pursuing his career with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Leopold's Last Talk
    Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy Volume 2 Issue 2 12-1-2012 Leopold's Last Talk Eric T. Freyfogle Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjelp Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric T. Freyfogle, Leopold's Last Talk, 2 WASH. J. ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 236 (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjelp/vol2/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Freyfogle: Leopold's Last Talk Copyright © 2012 by Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy LEOPOLD’S LAST TALK Eric T. Freyfogle* Abstract: During the last decade of his life, Aldo Leopold (1887–1948) delivered more than 100 conservation talks to various popular, professional, and student audiences. In them, he set forth plainly the central elements of his conservation thought. By studying the extensive archival records of these talks one sees clearly the core elements of Leopold’s mature thinking, which centered not on specific land-use practices (good or bad), but instead on what he saw as deep flaws in American culture. Leopold’s sharp cultural criticism—more clear in these talks than in his lyrical, muted classic, A Sand County Almanac—called into question not just liberal individualism but central elements of Enlightenment-era thought. This article distills the messages that Leopold repeatedly presented during his final years.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Categories
    Subject Categories Click on a Subject Category below: Anthropology Archaeology Astronomy and Astrophysics Atmospheric Sciences and Oceanography Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Business and Finance Cellular and Developmental Biology and Genetics Chemistry Communications, Journalism, Editing, and Publishing Computer Sciences and Technology Economics Educational, Scientific, Cultural, and Philanthropic Administration (Nongovernmental) Engineering and Technology Geology and Mineralogy Geophysics, Geography, and Other Earth Sciences History Law and Jurisprudence Literary Scholarship and Criticism and Language Literature (Creative Writing) Mathematics and Statistics Medicine and Health Microbiology and Immunology Natural History and Ecology; Evolutionary and Population Biology Neurosciences, Cognitive Sciences, and Behavioral Biology Performing Arts and Music – Criticism and Practice Philosophy Physics Physiology and Pharmacology Plant Sciences Political Science / International Relations Psychology / Education Public Affairs, Administration, and Policy (Governmental and Intergovernmental) Sociology / Demography Theology and Ministerial Practice Visual Arts, Art History, and Architecture Zoology Subject Categories of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 1780–2019 Das, Veena Gellner, Ernest Andre Leach, Edmund Ronald Anthropology Davis, Allison (William Gluckman, Max (Herman Leakey, Mary Douglas Allison) Max) Nicol Adams, Robert Descola, Philippe Goddard, Pliny Earle Leakey, Richard Erskine McCormick DeVore, Irven (Boyd Goodenough, Ward Hunt Frere Adler-Lomnitz, Larissa Irven) Goody, John Rankine Lee, Richard Borshay Appadurai, Arjun Dillehay, Tom D. Grayson, Donald K. LeVine, Robert Alan Bailey, Frederick George Dixon, Roland Burrage Greenberg, Joseph Levi-Strauss, Claude Barth, Fredrik Dodge, Ernest Stanley Harold Levy, Robert Isaac Bateson, Gregory Donnan, Christopher B. Greenhouse, Carol J. Levy, Thomas Evan Beall, Cynthia M. Douglas, Mary Margaret Grove, David C. Lewis, Oscar Benedict, Ruth Fulton Du Bois, Cora Alice Gumperz, John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ungulate Management in National Parks of the United States and Canada
    Ungulate Management in National Parks of the United States and Canada Technical Review 12-05 December 2012 1 Ungulate Management in National Parks of the United States and Canada The Wildlife Society Technical Review 12-05 - December 2012 Citation Demarais, S., L. Cornicelli, R. Kahn, E. Merrill, C. Miller, J. M. Peek, W. F. Porter, and G. A. Sargeant. 2012. Ungulate management in national parks of the United States and Canada. The Wildlife Society Technical Review 12-05. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Series Edited by Theodore A. Bookhout Copy Edit and Design Terra Rentz (AWB®), Managing Editor, The Wildlife Society Jessica Johnson, Associate Editor, The Wildlife Society Maja Smith, Graphic Designer, MajaDesign, Inc. Cover Images Front cover, clockwise from upper left: 1) Bull moose browsing on subalpine fir near Soda Butte Creek in Yellowstone National Park. Credit: Jim Peaco, National Park Service; 2) Bison in Stephens Creek pen in Yellowstone National Park. The Bison herds in Yellowstone are actively managed to maintain containment within park boundaries. Credit: Jim Peaco, National Park Service; 3) Bighorn sheep ram in Lamar Valley, Yellowstone National Park. Credit: Jim Peaco, National Park Service; 4) Biologists in Great Smokey Mountains National Park use non-lethal means, such as the use of a paintball gun depicted in this photo, to move elk from undesirable areas. Credit: Joseph Yarkovich; 5) National Park Service biologists Joe Yarkovich and Kim Delozier (now retired) working up an elk in Great Smokey Mountains National Park. Credit: Joseph Yarkovich; 6) Fencing protects willow (Salix spp.) and aspen (Populus spp.) from overgrazing by elk (Cervus elaphus) in Rocky Mountain National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: an Exploration of the Meanings Embodied in America’S Last Great Wilderness
    The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: An Exploration of the Meanings Embodied in America’s Last Great Wilderness Roger W. Kaye Abstract—The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge has been the sub- Central Brooks Range, expanded their understanding of the ject of more than 50 major studies investigating the bio-physical psychological benefits and cultural values one could experi- resources potentially threatened by oil development. This continu- ence in this landscape (Collins, personal communication ing project investigates the more elusive qualities at risk: the set of 1994, 1995). Aldo Leopold, a personal friend of most of the meanings this place holds for those who value it as wilderness. refuge founders, was another who had a “profound effect” on Findings indicate that these meanings may also be diminished or the range of scientific, experiential, and symbolic values dispelled by the potential introduction of new technologies, public they perceived wild places to hold. Collins says that Leopold’s uses or management actions that leave no footprint, some as writings gave early refuge proponents more reasons to value intangible as the mere naming of a mountain. A network of fourteen wilderness. “It was his ideas that we brought with us to meanings is described to provide a framework for interpreting the Alaska” (Collins, personal communication 1999). wilderness experience visitors seek and discover here, and for Through the late 1950s, the founding conservationists’ understanding the refuge’s emergence as a symbolic landscape of writings inspired a growing constituency to write, speak and national significance. testify for the area’s permanent protection. In 1960, the nine-million-acre Arctic Range was established by order of the Secretary of the Interior.
    [Show full text]