DOCSLIB.ORG

For 140 Systems with Fewer Than 25.000 Students. Included

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For 140 Systems with Fewer Than 25.000 Students. Included DOCUMENT RESUME ED 024 151 EA 001 804 Selected Statistics of Local School Systems, 1964-65. National Education Association, Washington, D.C. Report No- RR- 1966-R13 Pub Date Sep 66 Note-104p. Available from-National Education Association, 1201 Sixteenth St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (Stock No. 435-13288, $2.50). EDRS Price MF-S0.50 HC Not Available from EDRS. Descriptors- Assessed Valuation. Bond Issues, Capital Outlay (for Fixed Assets), Credentials, *Educational Finance, Expenditure Per Student, Fiscal Capacity, National Surveys, *Public School Systems, School Budget Elections, School Calendars, School Taxes, Statistical Surveys, *Student Enrollment, 'tables (Data), Teacher Persistei ,Teachers This ,ort on local school system statistics in the United States presents data for 140 school systems with enrollments of 25,000 or more and for 157 high salary sc1.. l systems with fewer than 25.000 students. Included are selected statistics 3n (1) pupils in school. (2) classroom teachers (degrees and turnover), (3) percents of revenue raised locally.(4) property tax rates,(5) maior items of expenditure.(6)fiscaldependence or independence, and(7)theresultsof referendums on school bonds and increases in tax rates. The data are presented in summary form and by school district. (TT) PROCESS WITH MICROFICHEAND PUBLISHER'S PRICES. MICRO- FICHE REPRODUCTION ONLY. RESEARCH REPORT 1966-R13 Selected Statistics of Local SchoolSystems, 1964-65 gRESEARCH DIVISION - NATIONALEDUCATION ASSOCIATION September 1966 PROCESS WITH MICROFICHE AND PUBLISHER'S PRiCES. MICRO- FICHE REPRODUCTION ONLY. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY. RESEARCH REPORT 1966-R13 Selected Statistics of Local School Systems, 1964-65 Permission to reproduce this copyrighted work hasbeen granted to the Educational Resources InformationCenter (ERIC) and to the organization operating undercontract with the Office to Educationto reproduce documents in- cluded in the ERIC system bymeans of microfiche only, but this right is not conferredto any users of the micro- fiche received from the ERIC Document Reproduction Service. Further reproduction ofany part requires per- mission of the copyright owner. RESEARCH DIVISIOIN ANIMA AL ED U LAT1U11AnSOCIATION Copyright © 1966 by the National Education Association All Rights Reserved SOW NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION President: Irvamae Applegate Executive Secretary: William G. Carr Assistant Executive Secretary for Information Services: Sam M. Lambert RESEARCH DIVISION DIRECTOR PUBLICATIONS EDITOR Glen Robinson Beatrice Crump Lee RESEARCH ASSISTANTS ASSISTANT DIRECTORS Donald P. Walker Martha L. Ware Marsha Ream Jean M. Flanigan Sheila Martin Simeon P. Taylor III William S. Graybeal CHIEFS OF SECTIONS Alton B. Sheridan Grace Brubaker, Information Wally Anne Sliter, Typing Frances H. Reynolds, Library RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Simeon P. Taylor III, Statistics Frieda S. Shapiro Gertrude N. Stieber ASSOCIATE CHIEF Nettie S. Shapiro Richard E. Scott, Statistics ASSISTANT CHIEFS ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Helen Kolodziey, Information Valdeane Rice Lilian C. Yang, TypiAg Research Report 1966-R13: SELECTED STATISTICS OF LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEMS, 1964-65 Project Directors: JEAN M. FLANIGAN, Assistant Director NETTIE S. SHAPIRO, Research Associate Price of Report: Single copy, $2.50. Stock #435-13288. Discounts on quantity orders: 2-9 copies, 107.; 10 or more copies, 207.. Orders not accompanied by payment will be billed with shipping charges added. Make checks payable to the National Education Association, 1201 Sixteenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Subscription Rate: One-year subscription to the NEA Research Division Reports, $10; send inquiries to NE& Records Division. Reproduction of Material: Address communications to the Publications Editor, Research Division, National Education Association, 1201 Sixteenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. NEA Departments and affiliated associations may reproduce excerpts from this Report in their official publications without authorization other than this notice. However, when quotations are used in publications sold commercially by individuals, organizations, or corporations, written permission must be obtained. In all cases, reproduction of the Research Report materials must include the usual credit line and the copyright notice. CONTENTS Foreword 5 Introduction 6 Pupils in School 8 Length of the School Year 9 Enrollment in Other School Programs 9 Classroom Teachers 10 Degrees 10 Teacher Turnover 11 Revenue 12 Local Revenue Share 12 Assessed Values 13 Tax Rates 14 Percent of Market Values 14 Estimated Effective Tax Rates 15 Current Expenditures 16 Per-Pupil Expenditure 16 Comparability with Other Series of Per-Pupil Costs 17 Capital Outlay 19 Interest on Long-Term Debt 20 Debt Retirement 21 Other School Programs 22 Summary of Expenditures 23 School Tax Rate and Bond Referendums 24 Fiscal Independence or Dependence 25 Selected School Systems 26 Appenaix 29 Questionnaire 95 Index to School Systems 99 List of Text Tables 1. Returns of Survey of Large Public School Systems, October 1964 7 2. Pupils in the Elementary and Secondary Day Schools of Large Public School Systems, 1964-65 8 3. Length of the School Year in Large School Systems, 1964-65 9 4. Enrollment in Summer Schools, Adult Education, and Junior Colleges of Large School Systems, 1964-65 9 5. Number of Classroom Teachers in Large School Systems, 1964-65 10 6. Distribution of Classroom Teachers in Large School Systems by Highest Level of Preparation, 1964-65 11 7. Classroom TeacherSeparations in Large School Systems, July 1, 1964, to June 30, 1965, as Percent of Total Number of Classr_4m Teachers 11 8. Average Percents of Revenue from Local Sources in Large School Systems, 1964-65 12 9. Assessed Values of Taxable Real Property and Average per Pupil in ADM in Large School Systems, 1964-65 13 10. Averages of Tax Rates for Schools per $1,000 of Assessed Valuations in Large School Systems, 1964-65 14 11. Averages of Prevailing Rates of Assessed Values to Market Values of . Real Property in Large School Systems, 1964-65 14 12. Estimated Averages of Effective Tax Rates per $1,000, on 100 Percent of Market Value of Real Property of Large School Systems, 1964-65 15 13. Current Expenditures by Major Purpose for Elementary and Secondary Day Schools of Large School Systems, 1964-65 17 14. Current Expenditures per Pupil in Average Daily Membership in Large School Systems, 1964-65 18 15. Means and Medians of Current Expenditures per Pupil in Average Daily Membership in Large School Systems, 1964-65 18 16. Capital Outlay Expenditures in Large School Systems, 1964-65 19 17. Expenditures for Interest on Long-Term Debt of Large School Systems, 1964-6520 18. Expenditures for Debt Retirement in Large School Systems, 1964-65 21 19. Expenditures for Programs Other Than Elementary and Secondary Day Schools, Large School Systems, 1964-65 22 20. Summary of Expenditures in 140 Large School Systems, 1964-65 23 21. Summary of Referendums on School Bonds and on Increasesin School Tax Rates, by Number of Large School Systems, 1964-65 24 22. Summary of Large School Systems by Fiscal Independence or Dependence, 1964-65 25 FOREWORD devoted The fifth annual reportof local school statistics is primarily to the large unifiedschool systems in the school year pupils, classroom 1964-65. Included are selected statistics on teachers, percents of revenueraised locally, property tax rates, and major items of expenditure,fiscal dependence or independence, in tax the results of referendums onschool bonds and increases rates. Data are given for 140of the 148 unified school systems witi, enrollments of 25,000 or morein October 1964, and for157 schedules small school systems whichprovide relatively high-salary for classroom teachers. Pressures for expanded schoolservices in urban areas are grow- funds are ing more acute each year.In many places the new federal One only supplementing imaginative newprograms alreadystarted. for basic result of the new activity hasbeen an increasing demand information on costs and relateditems for the school systems con- been undertaken to meet, in cerned. This series of reports has part, the urgent demandsfor comparative statistics. This study was prepared by NettieS. Shapiro, Research Associ. ate, under the directionof Jean M. Flanigan, AssistantDirector. Compilation of the data wasunder the supervision ofSimeon P. Tay- lor III, Assistant Directorand Chief of the StatisticsSection. Louise V. Trumbo, StatisticalClerk, also assisted with the report. The NEA Research Division isgrateful to the superintendents, the fiscal officers, researchdirectors, and others associated with for local school systems whocooperated in supplying information this report. The names of the respondents tothe questionnaire are given in the Index toSchool Systems. GLEN ROBINSON Director, Research Division 6 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of a ques- kindergartens and pupil transportation, which tionnaire survey of selected statisticsof pu- are provided in some systems are not provided pils, teachers, revenues, and expenditures of in others by either school or nonschool public local public school systems for the1964-65 agencies. school year. Questionnaires were mailed by the NEA Research Division in November1965, re- Summary data for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should Be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools
    Not As Good as You Think Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools By Lance Izumi, J.D. with Alicia Chang Ph.D. 1 Not As Good as You Think Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools By Lance Izumi, J.D. with Alicia Chang Ph.D. NOT AS GOOD AS YOU THINK Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should Be Concerned about Their Local Public Schools by Lance Izumi, J.D. with Alicia Chang, Ph.D. February 2016 ISBN: 978-1-934276-24-2 Pacific Research Institute 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: 415-989-0833 Fax: 415-989-2411 www.pacificresearch.org Download copies of this study at www.pacificresearch.org. Nothing contained in this report is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of the Pacific Research Institute or as an attempt to thwart or aid the passage of any legislation. ©2016 Pacific Research Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this publi- cation may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or other- wise, without prior written consent of the publisher. Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary............................................................................................... 5 Introduction and Background on “Not As Good As You Think” Research ................ 8 Performance of New Jersey Students
    [Show full text]
  • ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets
    ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets CDS CODE : 03-0040-888 DISTRICT : ALLENDALE BOARD OF EDUCATION SCHOOL : DISTRICT LEVEL The tables represent the annual proficiency targets, established for this School under ESEA Waiver Schools and Subgroups could meet expectations either by meeting the statewide proficiency rate of 90 percent, or reaching their individually determined progress targets. The statewide proficiency rate will be increased to 95 percent in 2015. Performance Targets - Language Arts Literacy # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 538 88.2 1 1011 89.2 90 90 90 90 90 White 464 89.2 .9 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic - - - 1011 - - - - - - American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian 51 88.3 1 1011 89.3 90 90 90 90 90 Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 56 53.5 3.9 1011 57.4 61.3 65.2 69.1 73 76.9 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged - - - 1011 - - - - - - Performance Targets - Mathematics # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 540 95.4 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 White 464 95.1 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic - - - 1011 - -
    [Show full text]
  • Bergen Community College Bergenfield Public
    BERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DATES Program dates vary by course. BROCHURE & APPLICATION http://www.bergen.edu/pages1/pages/6211.aspx REGISTRATION Registration is open until classes are full. PROGRAMS Enrichment: Algebra, Pre-Algebra, and Language Arts, Make My First Video Game, Web Design, Discover the Environment, Digital Photography, Intensive Writing Seminar, Taking Notes, and many more! ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Call: 201-447-7488 between 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m., or visit online brochure. BERGENFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS DATES Enrichment Courses: June 24 - July 19. Remedial Courses: June 24 - July 27 BROCHURE & APPLICATION http://www.bergenfield.org/cms/lib6/NJ01001228/Centricity/Domain/49/SummerEnrichmentBrochure.pdf REGISTRATION Enrichment Courses: Deliver/mail to Ms. Maura Andreula, Roy W. Brown Middle School, 130 South Washington Avenue, Bergenfield, NJ 07621, no later than Monday, June 3. Remedial Courses: All registration must be done in person and a parent/guardian must be present. Please contact the school in order to set up an appointment prior to Wednesday June 19, 2012. http://www.bergenfield.org/domain/292 PROGRAMS Enrichment Courses: Creative Writer's Workshop, Art Studio, Computer Program, Dance, Drama & Music Workshops. Remedial Courses: Language Arts, Math, Science, and Social Studies. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Summer Music Workshop: Contact Mr. Gregory P. Mulford at [email protected] http://www.bergenfield.org/cms/lib6/NJ01001228/Centricity/Domain/49/SummerMusicWorkshop.pdf CLIFTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS DATES July 8 - August 1, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. BROCHURE & APPLICATION http://www.clifton.k12.nj.us/summer.enrichment.asp REGISTRATION Program fee before May 28 is $325 and after May 28 is $350.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated NJ Rankings.Xlsx
    New Jersey School Relative Efficiency Rankings ‐ Outcome = Student Growth 2012, 2013, 2014 (deviations from other schools in same county, controlling for staffing expenditure per pupil, economies of scale, grade range & student populations) 3 Year Panel Separate Yearly Model (Time Models (5yr Avg. Varying School School District School Grade Span Characteristics) Ranking 1 Characteristics) Ranking 2 ESSEX FELLS SCHOOL DISTRICT Essex Fells Elementary School PK‐06 2.92 23.44 1 Upper Township Upper Township Elementary School 03‐05 3.00 12.94 2 Millburn Township Schools Glenwood School KG‐05 2.19 62.69 3 Hopewell Valley Regional School District Toll Gate Grammar School KG‐05 2.09 10 2.66 4 Verona Public Schools Brookdale Avenue School KG‐04 2.33 42.66 5 Parsippany‐Troy Hills Township Schools Northvail Elementary School KG‐05 2.35 32.56 6 Fort Lee Public Schools School No. 1PK‐06 2.03 12 2.50 7 Ridgewood Public Schools Orchard Elementary School KG‐05 1.88 17 2.43 8 Discovery Charter School DISCOVERY CS 04‐08 0.89 213 2.42 9 Princeton Public Schools Community Park School KG‐05 1.70 32 2.35 10 Hopewell Valley Regional School District Hopewell Elementary School PK‐05 1.65 37 2.35 11 Cresskill Public School District Merritt Memorial PK‐05 1.69 33 2.33 12 West Orange Public Schools REDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KG‐05 1.81 21 2.28 13 Millburn Township Schools South Mountain School PK‐05 1.93 14 2.25 14 THE NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELLIOTT STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PK‐04 2.15 82.25 15 PATERSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL 19 KG‐04 1.95 13 2.24 16 GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP
    [Show full text]
  • Paramus High School Program of Studies 2017-18 School Year
    17-18 PARAMUS HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM OF STUDIES BUILT ON TRADITION AND CULTIVATED THROUGH EXCELLENCE A GUIDE TO PROGRAMS AND COURSE OFFERINGS PARAMUS HIGH SCHOOL | 99 E. CENTURY ROAD, PARAMUS, NJ 07652 PARAMUS HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM OF STUDIES 2017-18 SCHOOL YEAR PREPARED BY THE SUPERVISOR OF SCHOOL COUNSELING Tiffany M. Goodson The Mission of the Paramus Public Schools is to develop all students as open-minded, life-long learners, who pursue their dreams and add value to the world. ADMINISTRATION PARAMUS HIGH SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION Raymond J. Kiem Principal Lina Gudelis Assistant Principal Louis Natalo Assistant Principal DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION Michele Robinson, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools Sean Adams Assistant Superintendent for Administration, Supervision and Curriculum Steven Cea Business Administrator / Board Secretary Margaret Damiano Supervisor of Student Personnel Services Christine Diaz Supervisor of Staff Development, Instructional Technology and Assessment Timothy Donohue Supervisor of Humanities: English Lang. Arts, ESL, Social Studies & World Lang. Tiffany M. Goodson Supervisor of School Counseling Michael J. Pilacik, Ed. D. Supervisor of S.T.E.M. Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics Karen Peterson Supervisor of Special Programs Donald Roll Athletic Director Supervisor of PE & Wellness Lisa Vartanian Supervisor of Fine, Practical & Performing Arts Gail Wiser Supervisor of Elementary Education BOARD OF EDUCATION William Holzmann, President Bernadette McCausland, Vice President Joanne G. Bergmann Anthony Feorenzo, Jr. Melissa Caminiti Elisa Giblin Lisa Cassesa Patricia Kim Alison Donoghue PUBLIC NOTICE OF NON-DISCRIMINATION Paramus Public Schools does not discriminate on the basis of race, age, color, national origin, religion, sex, genetic information, or physical or mental disability in admission to, access to, treatment in or delivery of its educational programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Paramus High School
    2019-20 PARAMUS HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM OF STUDIES PARAMUS HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM OF STUDIES 2019-20 SCHOOL YEAR Prepared by Tiffany M. Goodson Supervisor of School Counseling Paramus Public Schools, built on a tradition of excellence and innovation, in partnership with its community, empowers students to succeed as global citizens who add value to the world. ADMINISTRATION PARAMUS HIGH SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION Raymond J. Kiem Principal Louis A. Natalo Assistant Principal Thomas Montuori Assistant Principal Donald Roll Athletic Director / Supervisor of P.E. & Wellness PARAMUS PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION Michele Robinson, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools Sean Adams Assistant Superintendent of Schools Alfredo Aguilar, Ed. D. Business Administrator / Board Secretary Timothy Donohue Director of Innovation, Instruction & Professional Development DEPARTMENT SUPERVISORS Dara Carr Supervisor of Elementary Education & District Programs Margaret Damiano Supervisor of Student Personnel Services Christine Diaz Supervisor of Assessment, Accountability & Evaluations Tiffany M. Goodson Supervisor of School Counseling Lina Gudelis Supervisor of Humanities: English Lang. Arts, ESL, Social Studies & World Languages Robert Lehmann Supervisor of S.T.E.M.: Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics Lisa Vartanian Supervisor of Visual & Performing Arts & 21st Century Life & Careers BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS Joanne G. Bergmann Bernadette McCausland, President Elisa Giblin Lisa Cassesa Melissa Caminiti, Vice President William Holzmann Alison Donoghue Anthony Feorenzo, Jr. Patricia Kim INTRODUCTION The Program of Studies is a publication designed to assist students and parents in mapping out an appropriate and rigorous academic program for high school. Decision-making is an important part of the course selection process and therefore, offerings should be carefully reviewed in order to select courses that will best meet the needs, interests and goals of each individual student.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Five-Year Career and Technical Education State Plan
    U. S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education * * * * * * * * * * * The Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 STATE PLAN COVER PAGE State Name: NEW JERSEY Eligible Agency Submitting Plan on Behalf of State: NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Person at, or representing, the eligible agency responsible for answering questions on this plan: Signature: Name: Marie Barry Position: State Director, Career and Technical Education; Director, Office of Career and Technical Education Telephone: (609) 633-0665 Email: [email protected] Type of State Plan Submission (check one): ___ 6-Year Full Plan – FY 2007 – FY 2013 1-Year Transition – FY 2007 – FY 2008 (submitted April 2007) X 5-Year Plan – FY 2008 – FY 2013 Special Features of State Plan Submission (check all that apply): ___ Unified - Secondary and Postsecondary ___ Unified - Postsecondary Only ___ Title I only (All Title II funds have been consolidated under Title I) X Title I and Title II 1 NEW JERSEY FIVE-YEAR CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION STATE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE PART A: STATE PLAN NARRATIVE 4 I. PLANNING, COORDINATION, AND COLLABORATION PRIOR TO 5 PLAN SUBMISSION A. Statutory Requirements 5 B. Procedural Suggestions and Planning Reminders 11 II. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION 12 A. Statutory Requirements 12 B. Other Department Requirements 67 III. PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR SPECIAL POPULATIONS 70 A. Statutory Requirements 70 IV. ACCOUNTABILITY AND EVALUATION 79 A. Statutory Requirements 79 B. Other Department Requirements 93 V. TECH PREP PROGRAMS 94 A. Statutory Requirements 94 B. Other Department Requirements 108 VI. FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS 110 A.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Bergen
    COUNTY OF BERGEN 2021 COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL DIRECTORY WWW.CO.BERGEN.NJ.US Published by the COUNTY OF BERGEN Produced by the Office of the County Executive @BergenGov @BergenCountyNJ www.Co.Bergen.NJ.US Cover Bergen County Courthouse Editors Joseph P. Baldofsky Breanne Pellicano June 2021 Printed by Royal Printing Service CONTENTS County Executive ..................................................................................... ....5 Board of Commissioners ..............................................................................6 Commmissioners' Committee Assignments.............................................. ....8 Commissioner Representation on Various Boards & Agencies ............. ...8 Constitutional Officers ............................................................................. ...9 Education in Bergen County .................................................................. ...10 County Public School Districts (listed alphabetically) ................................................................................ ...11 Organizational Chart of County Government ...................................... ...12 County Departments, Authorities, Agencies, & Commissions (listed alphabetically) ................................................................................ ...15 County Administrative Divisions and Offices (listed alphabetically) ................................................................................ ...21 The Courts ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Education Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Regular Meeting Monday, June 14, 2021, 8:00 P.M
    1 Board of Education Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Regular Meeting Monday, June 14, 2021, 8:00 p.m. Minutes This Regular Session of the Upper Saddle River Board of Education was held in the Cavallini School Auditorium of the Upper Saddle River Schools beginning at 8:00 p.m. Mrs. Johnston opened the meeting and stated that the meeting was being held in compliance with PL 1975, Chapter 232 and appropriate notice had been provided to the designated newspapers, the Borough Clerk and all interested parties requesting such notification. Members present: Mrs. Johnston, Mrs. Gandara, Mrs. Ginsberg, Mrs. Gray, Mr. Quagliani, Dr. Verducci, Mrs. Wenberg Members absent: None Also present: Dr. Siegel, Mrs. Imbasciani CONFIDENTIAL SESSION Mrs. Gandara made a motion, seconded by Mrs. Wenberg to convene into Executive Session at 7:45 p.m. Mrs. Johnston then read the following statement: WHEREAS, the members of the Upper Saddle River Board of Education deem necessary to discuss personnel and legal matters, and WHEREAS, the topics to be discussed are within the exemptions which are permitted to be discussed and acted upon in confidential session pursuant to PL 1975, Chapter 231, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting will be made public when the need for privacy no longer exists. Action may be taken. Dr. Verducci made a motion, seconded by Mrs. Wenberg to adjourn Executive Session at 7:55 p.m. Mrs. Gandara made a motion, seconded by Dr. Verducci to convene into Public Hearing and Regular Session at 8:00 p.m. OPENING STATEMENT: Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 033 439 Selected Statistics of Local School
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 033 439 EA 002 522 TITLE Selected Statistics of Local School Systems, 1966-67. INSTITUTION National Education Association, Washingtcn, D.C. Report No RP-1968-R11 Pub Date 68 Note 120p. Available from Publications Sales Section, National Education Association,' 1201 Sixteenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (#435-13362, $2.25, quantity discounts). EDRS Price EDRS Price MF-$0.50 HC Not Available from EDRS. Descriptors Average Daily Attendance, Bend Issues, *Educational Finance, Expenditure Per Student, Expenditures, National Surveys, *Public School Systems, School Bridget Elections, *School Statistics, School Taxes, State Federal Aid, State School District Relationship, *Student Enrollment, Tax Rates, Teacher Education, *Teachers Abstract This reFcrt presents selected statistics related to student enrollment and attendance, teacher preparation and turnover, revenue sources, major expenditures, property tax rates, results of referendums on school bonds, increased tax rates, and school budgets for local public school systems during the 1966-67 school year. These statistics are based on questionnaire survey returns received from 155 (92.8%) of the nation's 167 school systems enrolling more than 25,000 students, and on returns received frcm 161 selected school systems with enrollments under 25,000. Data for the entire sample is summarized in tables 1 through 22 of the text. The appendix contains detailed data for each responding school system arranged alphabetically by State, and divided into four strata on the basis cf total enrollment. (JH) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLYAS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIALOFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY.
    [Show full text]
  • Paramus Public Schools Director of Human Resources
    An Invitation to Apply for the Director of Human Resources ●●● The deadline to apply is January 4, 2017 ●●● Paramus Public School District Bergen County, New Jersey New Jersey Monthly magazine ranked Paramus as its 21st best place to live in its 2013 rankings of the "Best Places To Live" in New Jersey. According to a The Search Process recent NerdWallet survey, the sixth-best place to start The Board of Education of the Paramus Public a business in New Jersey is Paramus as well as being School, Bergen County, New Jersey, is initiating a the ninth-best place for home ownership in the search for a Director of Human Resources in state. Paramus ranked in the top 20 places with accordance with the Board Policies and New Jersey populations over 25,000 in the U.S. by median Statutes. household income as reported by CNN Money. At the 2010 United States Census, there were 26,342 The Board has retained the New Jersey Association of people, 8,630 households, and 6,939 families residing School Administrators (NJASA) and Stockton in the borough. The population density was 2,516.0 University as a consultant to assist in the selection of per square mile. There were 8,915 housing units at an candidates to find an exceptional leader to follow in average density of 851.5 per square mile. The racial the tradition of excellence expected by this makeup of the borough was 72.29% (19,042) White, community and school district. 1.42% (374) Black or African American, 0.11% (28) Native American, 22.28% (5,869) Asian, 0.05% Applications will be received until January 4, 2017 (13) Pacific Islander, 1.39% (366) from other races, and it is anticipated that the Board of Education will and 2.47% (650) from two or more races.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feasibility Study on the Termination of the Sending-Receiving
    A Feasibility Study on the Termination of the Sending-Receiving Agreement Between the Maywood Public Schools and the Hackensack Public Schools by Statistical Forecasting LLC, John Kazmark, Ed.D., and James L. Kirtland CPAOH July 2019 4236031 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. 4 I. Introduction ………….. ................................................................................................ 5 II. Demographic Profiles .............................................................................................................. 7 A. Community Descriptions ................................................................................................... 7 1. Borough of Maywood ............................................................................................ 7 2. City of Hackensack ............................................................................................... 8 3. Borough of Dumont ............................................................................................. 9 4. Borough of Midland Park ..................................................................................... 10 5. Borough of Paramus ............................................................................................. 11 6. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional Geographical Area ........................................ 12 B. Demographic Characteristics ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]