DOCSLIB.ORG

A Feasibility Study on the Termination of the Sending-Receiving

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Feasibility Study on the Termination of the Sending-Receiving A Feasibility Study on the Termination of the Sending-Receiving Agreement Between the Maywood Public Schools and the Hackensack Public Schools by Statistical Forecasting LLC, John Kazmark, Ed.D., and James L. Kirtland CPAOH July 2019 4236031 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. 4 I. Introduction ………….. ................................................................................................ 5 II. Demographic Profiles .............................................................................................................. 7 A. Community Descriptions ................................................................................................... 7 1. Borough of Maywood ............................................................................................ 7 2. City of Hackensack ............................................................................................... 8 3. Borough of Dumont ............................................................................................. 9 4. Borough of Midland Park ..................................................................................... 10 5. Borough of Paramus ............................................................................................. 11 6. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional Geographical Area ........................................ 12 B. Demographic Characteristics ............................................................................................. 14 1. Borough of Maywood ............................................................................................ 15 2. City of Hackensack ............................................................................................... 16 3. Borough of Dumont ............................................................................................ 18 4. Borough of Midland Park ..................................................................................... 19 5. Borough of Paramus ............................................................................................. 20 6. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional Geographical Area ........................................ 21 C. District Overviews ............................................................................................................. 22 1. Maywood Public Schools ....................................................................................... 22 2. Hackensack Public Schools .................................................................................. 22 3. Dumont Public Schools ......................................................................................... 22 4. Midland Park Public Schools ............................................................................... 22 5. Paramus Public Schools ....................................................................................... 23 6. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional School District ............................................... 23 D. Explanation of the Cohort-Survival Ratio Method ........................................................... 24 E. Historical Enrollment Trends ............................................................................................. 25 1. Maywood Public Schools ....................................................................................... 25 2. Hackensack Public Schools .................................................................................. 25 3. Dumont Public Schools ......................................................................................... 25 4. Midland Park Public Schools ............................................................................... 29 5. Paramus Public Schools ....................................................................................... 29 6. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional School District ............................................... 29 F. Birth Data .............................................................................................................. 33 G. Potential New Housing .................................................................................................... 35 1. Borough of Maywood ............................................................................................ 35 2. City of Hackensack ............................................................................................... 37 3. Borough of Dumont ............................................................................................ 39 4. Borough of Midland Park ..................................................................................... 40 5. Borough of Paramus ............................................................................................. 41 6. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional Geographic Area ........................................... 42 H. Enrollment Projections ..................................................................................................... 43 1. Maywood Public Schools ....................................................................................... 46 2. Hackensack Public Schools .................................................................................. 47 3. Dumont Public Schools ......................................................................................... 48 4. Midland Park Public Schools ............................................................................... 49 5. Paramus Public Schools ....................................................................................... 50 6. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional School District .............................................. 51 I. Capacity Analysis ............................................................................................................ 52 III. Educational Programs .............................................................................................................. 54 A. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 54 B. Overview of School Districts .......................................................................................... 54 1. Maywood Public Schools ....................................................................................... 54 2. Hackensack Public Schools .................................................................................. 55 a) Hackensack High School ......................................................................... 55 3. Dumont Public Schools ......................................................................................... 56 a) Dumont High School ............................................................................... 56 4. Midland Park Public Schools ............................................................................... 57 a) Midland Park Junior/Senior High School ................................................ 57 5. Paramus Public Schools ....................................................................................... 58 a) Paramus High School .............................................................................. 58 4236031 3 6. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional School District ............................................... 59 a) Becton Regional High School ................................................................. 59 C. Comparison of New Jersey Assessments and Related Progress Indicators ...................... 60 1. Background ............................................................................................................ 60 2. PARCC Performance Levels ................................................................................ 60 3. Comparison of New Jersey PARCC results for Grades Three-Eleven and New Jersey Biology Competency Test (NJBCT) .................. 61 4. Scholastic Aptitude Test ....................................................................................... 81 5. Advanced Placement/International Baccalaureate Course Information ................ 82 6. Technology Readiness .......................................................................................... 82 7. Teacher Characteristics ........................................................................................ 85 8. Visual and Performing Arts .................................................................................. 86 9. ESSA .............................................................................................................. 87 D. Educational Summary and Recommendations ................................................................ 89 1. Facilities .............................................................................................................. 89 2. Programs .............................................................................................................. 90 3. Student Outcomes ................................................................................................. 91 4. Conclusion and Recommendations ...................................................................... 93 IV. Racial Impact .............................................................................................................. 96 A. Maywood Public Schools Enrollments by Race .............................................................. 96 1. District Totals (PK-8) ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Njsiaa Wrestling Public School Classifications 2018 - 2019
    NJSIAA WRESTLING PUBLIC SCHOOL CLASSIFICATIONS 2018 - 2019 North I, Group V North I, Group IV (Range 1,394 - 2,713) (Range 940 - 1,302) Northing Northing School Name Number Enrollment School Name Number Enrollment Bloomfield High School 712844 1,473 Belleville High School 716518 1,057 Clifton High School 742019 2,131 Cliffside Park High School 724048 940 East Orange Campus High School 701896 1,756 Fair Lawn High School 763923 1,102 Eastside High School 756591 2,304 Kearny High School 701968 1,293 Hackensack High School 745799 1,431 Morris Hills High School 745480 985 John F. Kennedy High School 756570 2,478 Morris Knolls High School 745479 1,100 Livingston High School 709106 1,434 Mount Olive High School 749123 1,158 Montclair High School 723754 1,596 Northern Highlands Regional HS 800331 1,021 Morristown High School 716336 1,394 Orange High School 701870 941 North Bergen High School 717175 1,852 Randolph High School 730913 1,182 Passaic County Technical Institute 763837 2,633 Ridgewood High School 778520 1,302 Passaic High School 734778 2,396 Roxbury High School 738224 1,010 Union City High School 705770 2,713 Wayne Hills High School 774731 953 West Orange High School 716434 1,574 Wayne Valley High School 763819 994 North I, Group III North I, Group II (Range 762 - 917) (Range 514 - 751) Northing Northing School Name Number Enrollment School Name Number Enrollment Bergenfield High School 760447 847 Dumont High School 767749 611 Dwight Morrow High School 753193 816 Glen Rock High School 771209 560 Indian Hills High School 796598 808 High
    [Show full text]
  • Njsiaa Baseball Public School Classifications 2018 - 2020
    NJSIAA BASEBALL PUBLIC SCHOOL CLASSIFICATIONS 2018 - 2020 North I, Group IV North I, Group III (Range 1,100 - 2,713) (Range 788 - 1,021) Northing Northing School Name Number Enrollment School Name Number Enrollment Bergen County Technical High School 753114 1,669 Bergenfield High School 760447 847 Bloomfield High School 712844 1,473 Dwight Morrow High School 753193 816 Clifton High School 742019 2,131 Garfield High School 745720 810 Eastside High School 756591 2,304 Indian Hills High School 796598 808 Fair Lawn High School 763923 1,102 Montville Township High School 749158 904 Hackensack High School 745799 1,431 Morris Hills High School 745480 985 John F. Kennedy High School 756570 2,478 Northern Highlands Regional High School 800331 1,021 Kearny High School 701968 1,293 Northern Valley Regional at Old Tappan 793284 917 Livingston High School 709106 1,434 Paramus High School 760357 894 Memorial High School 710478 1,502 Parsippany Hills High School 738197 788 Montclair High School 723754 1,596 Pascack Valley High School 789561 908 Morris Knolls High School 745479 1,100 Passaic Valley High School 741969 930 Morristown High School 716336 1,394 Ramapo High School 785705 885 Mount Olive High School 749123 1,158 River Dell Regional High School 767687 803 North Bergen High School 717175 1,852 Roxbury High School 738224 1,010 Passaic County Technical Institute 763837 2,633 Sparta High School 807435 824 Passaic High School 734778 2,396 Teaneck High School 749517 876 Randolph High School 730913 1,182 Tenafly High School 764155 910 Ridgewood High
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Public Meeting June 24, 2019 1
    REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING JUNE 24, 2019 BOARD OF EDUCATION Ridgewood, New Jersey June 24, 2019 Education Center Regular Public Meeting 4:00 p.m. AGENDA * * * * * MEETING REGULATIONS At all regular meetings, two opportunities are provided for citizens to make comments. The public comment periods will be scheduled after presentations and approximately 4:30 p.m. or just prior to the end of the meeting, whichever occurs first. The first opportunity may be limited by the presiding officer to conclude at about 5:00 p.m. in order for the Board to continue with its scheduled agenda. The second opportunity will occur at about 5:30 p.m. at the discretion of the presiding officer taking into consideration a break point in the agenda. At every opportunity for public comment, citizens are invited to comment on subjects on the agenda or general topics. At the discretion of the presiding officer, public comments may be permitted at other times. Please remember this is a public meeting. Anything you say will be a public record. As a result, pursuant to law, the Board of Education cannot respond to you publicly concerning certain matters, such as those regarding an individual student or personnel. If there is a matter that you wish to remain private concerning personnel or students, please contact the Superintendent’s Office. Public comment periods shall also be governed by the following rules: 1. Persons wishing to speak must, upon being recognized, rise, sign in, and state their names and addresses. 2. Each speaker shall be limited to four minutes. The Board Recorder will note the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    September 21, 2015 Regular Public Meeting Minutes Passaic Board of Education Passaic, New Jersey 07055 September 21, 2015 6:00p.m. Board Rooms AGENDA: A. Calling the Meeting to Order Vice President Byron Bustos called the meeting to order at 6:00p.m. He said that the meeting is being held in accordance with the "Open Public Meetings Act". The meeting notice was mailed to The Herald News, El Diario, The Record and the Presidents of the five employee groups. B. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance C. Roll Call Members Present: Vice President Bustos, Ms. Maryann Capursi, Mr. Horacio "Ray" Carrera, Ms. Kenia Flores, Mr. Craig Miller, and Mr. Peter Rosario Absent: Mr. Salim Patel, Mr. Ronald VanRensalier and President Richard Diaz Also Present: Mr. Pablo Munoz, Superintendent of Schools, Ms. Eveny Pagan de Mendez, Asst. Superintendent of Schools, Ms. Rachel Goldberg, Asst. Superintendent of Curriculum & Instruction, Ms. Aida Garcia, Chief of Operations, Ms. Erlinda R. Arellano, School Business Administrator and Ms. Michelle Calas, Asst. School Business Administrator Board Attorney: Yaacov Erisman D. Public Participation: Jaroslaw Jackiw, 266 Lafayette Avenue -- Asked following questions: When will July, August and September minutes be posted on web-site? When will audio of July, August and September meetings be posted on web-site? Has BOE Facilities Director and Staff inspected all district completed projects as of September 18, 2015? Has BOE Facilities Director and Staff addressed exterior neglects of School # 11? What is update of progress School # 11 parking lot as of September 18, 20 15? In SSA 2014 Board approved 19 SROs & Supervisory Staff; in SSA 2015 Board approved 15 SROs & Supervisory Staff; in SSA 2016- will Board return the four SROs that were reduced to address the perceived security issues of SY 2015 by arents students and educators at PHS, LMS, etc.? 1 September 21, 2015 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 283 State Cong Code LEA Code LEA Name Estimated FY2018
    Table 2. Estimated FY2018 Grants to Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) Under Title IV-A at an Appropriations Level of $1.1 Billion Dollars in thousands Source: Table prepared by CRS, March 26, 2018, based on unpublished data provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED), Budget Service and congressional district information available from the U.S. Census Bureau. The appropriations level was provided by the requester. Notice: These are estimated grants only. These estimates are provided solely to assist in comparisons of the relative impact of alternative formulas and funding levels in the legislative process. They are not intended to predict specific amounts LEAs will receive. In addition to other limitations, data needed to calculate final grants may not yet be available. State Cong code LEA code LEA name Estimated FY2018 grant amount AL 102 100001 Fort Rucker School District $10 AL 102 100003 Maxwell AFB School District $10 AL 104 100005 Albertville City School District $153 AL 104 100006 Marshall County School District $192 AL 106, 107 100007 Hoover City School District $86 AL 105 100008 Madison City School District $57 AL 103, 106 100011 Leeds City School District $32 AL 104 100012 Boaz City School District $41 AL 103, 106, 107 100013 Trussville City School District $20 AL 103 100030 Alexander City City School District $83 AL 102 100060 Andalusia City School District $51 AL 103 100090 Anniston City School District $122 AL 104 100100 Arab City School District $26 AL 105 100120 Athens City School District $54 AL 104 100180 Attalla
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study About the Relationship Between PDS and Non PDS High School Variables and Student Outcomes in the State of New Jersey Maria A
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs) 2009 A Case Study About the Relationship Between PDS and Non PDS High School Variables and Student Outcomes in the State of New Jersey Maria A. Poidomani Seton Hall University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations Part of the Educational Methods Commons, and the Other Education Commons Recommended Citation Poidomani, Maria A., "A Case Study About the Relationship Between PDS and Non PDS High School Variables and Student Outcomes in the State of New Jersey" (2009). Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 52. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/52 A Case Study about the Relationship between PDS and Non-PDS High School Variables and Student Outcomes in the State of New Jersey BY Maria A. Poidomani Dissertation Committee Mary Ruzicka, Ph.D., Mentor James Caulfield, Ed.D. James Montesano, Ed.D. BNC~Sabatini, Ed.D. Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Seton Hall University ABSTRACT A CASE STUDY ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PDS AND NON PDS HIGH SCHOOL VARIABLES AND STUDENT OUTCOMES IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY by Maria A. Poidomani Using a case study design and inferential statistics, the author examined data from 14 New Jersey High Schools to see if there was a difference between Professional Development (PDS) high schools and Non PDS high schools in regards to student achievement and other school variables. Data was analyzed in aggregate according to PDS and Non PDS designation and was also analyzed by matching seven PDS and seven Non PDS schools by socio-economic (DFG) designation and percentage of ethnicity diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • NJSIAA WINTER TRACK PUBLIC SCHOOL CLASSIFICATIONS 2018 - 2020 (Updated December 2019)
    NJSIAA WINTER TRACK PUBLIC SCHOOL CLASSIFICATIONS 2018 - 2020 (Updated December 2019) North I, Group IV North I, Group III (Range 1,293 - 2,713) (Range 876 - 1,182) Northing Northing School Name Number Enrollment School Name Number Enrollment Bergen Co Tech High School 753114 1,669 Cliffside Park High School 724048 940 Bloomfield High School 712844 1,473 Fair Lawn High School 763923 1,102 Clifton High School 742019 2,131 Montville Township High School 749158 904 East Orange Campus High School 701896 1,756 Morris Hills High School 745480 985 Eastside High School 756591 2,304 Morris Knolls High School 745479 1,100 Hackensack High School 745799 1,431 Mount Olive High School 749123 1,158 John F. Kennedy High School 756570 2,478 No Valley Regional Old Tappan 793284 917 Kearny High School 701968 1,293 Northern Highlands Regional Hs 800331 1,021 Livingston High School 709106 1,434 Paramus High School 760357 894 Memorial High School 710478 1,502 Pascack Valley High School 789561 908 Montclair High School 723754 1,596 Passaic Valley High School 741969 930 Morristown High School 716336 1,394 Ramapo High School 785705 885 North Bergen High School 717175 1,852 Randolph High School 730913 1,182 Passaic County Technical Institute 763837 2,633 Roxbury High School 738224 1,010 Passaic High School 734778 2,396 Teaneck High School 749517 876 Ridgewood High School 778520 1,302 Tenafly High School 764155 910 Union City High School 705770 2,713 Wayne Hills High School 774731 953 West Orange High School 716434 1,574 Wayne Valley High School 763819 994 North I, Group II North I, Group I (Range 607 - 847) (Range 227 - 560) Northing Northing School Name Number Enrollment School Name Number Enrollment Bergenfield High School 760447 847 Bergen Arts and Science Charter 745876 247 Dover High School 749128 762 Butler High School 785594 374 Dumont High School 767749 611 Cedar Grove High School 734674 374 Dwight Morrow High School 753193 816 Emerson Jr.-Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Arbitration Panel
    162-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ------------------------------------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF TENURE CHARGES ) ) - against - ) ) OPINION DAVID PETRELLA, ) AND Respondent-Teacher ) DECISION - filed by - ) ) HACKENSACK BOARD OF EDUCATION ) BERGEN COUNTY, ) District-Petitioner ) ) AGENCY DOCKET NO. 292-11/18 ) ------------------------------------------------------------------- Before: Prof. Robert T. Simmelkjaer, Esq. Arbitrator APPEARANCES FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT John G. Geppert, Jr., Esq., Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC Matthew J. Donohue, Esq., Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC FOR THE RESPONDENT Robert M. Schwartz, Esq., Schwartz Law Group, LLC ALSO PRESENT Rosemary Marks, District Superintendent 2 PROCEDURAL HISTORY On November 12, 2018, District Superintendent Rosemary Marks (“Superintendent Marks”) filed nine (9) tenure charges of unbecoming conduct and/or other just cause for dismissal against Respondent, a tenured Director of the Athletic Department, along with a sworn statement of evidence in support of the charges. (B. Ex. #1). On that date, Superintendent Marks also served Respondent with said charges and evidence. Specifically, Respondent was charged with committing conduct unbecoming in relation to: 1. Failing to Enforce Snow Day Protocol & Failure to Punch In; 2. Falsifying Time Records / Theft of Time; 3. Failing to Ensure Coaches had Current CPR/First Aid Certifications; 4. Making a Highly Inappropriate Comment about Teachers dating Students; 5. Failing to Properly Schedule Transportation for Athletic Events; 6. Failure to Properly Schedule H-Cops; 7. Failure to Ensure Supervision of Concessions’ Stand leading to Injury of a Student; 8. Misrepresentation during Investigation of a Student Injury; and 9. Pattern of Unbecoming Conduct and Other Just Cause. On November 27, 2018, after consideration of the charges and evidence against the Respondent, the Board found probable cause to credit the evidence warranting the Respondent’s dismissal.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should Be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools
    Not As Good as You Think Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools By Lance Izumi, J.D. with Alicia Chang Ph.D. 1 Not As Good as You Think Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools By Lance Izumi, J.D. with Alicia Chang Ph.D. NOT AS GOOD AS YOU THINK Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should Be Concerned about Their Local Public Schools by Lance Izumi, J.D. with Alicia Chang, Ph.D. February 2016 ISBN: 978-1-934276-24-2 Pacific Research Institute 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: 415-989-0833 Fax: 415-989-2411 www.pacificresearch.org Download copies of this study at www.pacificresearch.org. Nothing contained in this report is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of the Pacific Research Institute or as an attempt to thwart or aid the passage of any legislation. ©2016 Pacific Research Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this publi- cation may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or other- wise, without prior written consent of the publisher. Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary............................................................................................... 5 Introduction and Background on “Not As Good As You Think” Research ................ 8 Performance of New Jersey Students
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Accreditation Status Institutional
    STATEMENT OF ACCREDITATION STATUS SETON HALL UNIVERSITY 400 South Orange Avenue South Orange, NJ 07079 Phone: (973) 761-9000; Fax: (973) 275-2361 www.shu.edu Chief Executive Officer: Dr. Mary Meehan, Interim President INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION Enrollment 7635 Undergraduate; 3880 Graduate (Headcount): Control: Private (Non-Profit) Affiliation: Religious- Roman Catholic Church 2015 Carnegie Doctoral Universities - Moderate Research Activity Classification: Approved Bachelor's, Master's, Post-Master's Award/Cert/Diploma, Doctor's - Credential Levels: Professional Practice, Doctor's - Research/Scholarship; Distance Education Fully Approved Programs: Accreditors Recognized by U.S. Secretary of Education: American Bar Association, Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, American Occupational Therapy Association, Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education, American Physical Therapy Association, Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education, American Psychological Association, Commission on Accreditation, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Commission on Accrediting of the Association of Theological Schools, Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) , Council on Social Work Education Instructional Locations Branch Campuses: None Additional Locations: 2 Exchange Place, Jersey City, NJ; 2 Jake Garzio Dr., Ewing Township, NJ; Bayonne Police Headquarters, Bayonne, NJ; Beijing Location, 12 Huixin East
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Schools
    Moody’s Mega Math Challenge A contest for high school students SIAM Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 3600 Market Street, 6th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA [email protected] M3Challenge.siam.org 2009 M3 Registered Schools Connecticut Fairfield County Bethel High School, Bethel Bassick High School, Bridgeport New Canaan High School, New Canaan (two teams) Brien McMahon High School, Norwalk Ridgefield High School, Ridgefield Stamford High School, Stamford (two teams) Weston High School, Weston (two teams) Staples High School, Westport Hartford County Miss Porter's School, Farmington Greater Hartford Academy of Math and Science, Hartford (two teams) Newington High School, Newington Conard High School, West Hartford Litchfield County Kent School, Kent New Milford High School, New Milford (two teams) Northwestern Regional High School, Winsted (two teams) Middlesex County Valley Regional High School, Deep River East Hampton High School, East Hampton New Haven County Hamden High School, Hamden (two teams) Francis T. Maloney High School, Meriden Joseph A. Foran High School, Milford Wilbur Cross High School, New Haven Wolcott High School, Wolcott (two teams) New London County East Lyme High School, East Lyme New London Public Schools, New London Norwich Free Academy, Norwich Delaware New Castle County Sanford School, Hockessin Pencader Charter, New Castle Charter School of Wilmington, Wilmington (two teams) Salesianum School, Wilmington District of Columbia Coolidge High School, Washington, D.C. Benjamin Banneker Academic High
    [Show full text]
  • ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets
    ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets CDS CODE : 03-0040-888 DISTRICT : ALLENDALE BOARD OF EDUCATION SCHOOL : DISTRICT LEVEL The tables represent the annual proficiency targets, established for this School under ESEA Waiver Schools and Subgroups could meet expectations either by meeting the statewide proficiency rate of 90 percent, or reaching their individually determined progress targets. The statewide proficiency rate will be increased to 95 percent in 2015. Performance Targets - Language Arts Literacy # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 538 88.2 1 1011 89.2 90 90 90 90 90 White 464 89.2 .9 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic - - - 1011 - - - - - - American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian 51 88.3 1 1011 89.3 90 90 90 90 90 Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 56 53.5 3.9 1011 57.4 61.3 65.2 69.1 73 76.9 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged - - - 1011 - - - - - - Performance Targets - Mathematics # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 540 95.4 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 White 464 95.1 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic - - - 1011 - -
    [Show full text]