Guidelines for Researchers Using Data

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guidelines for Researchers Using Data SURVEILLANCE OF CEREBRAL PALSY IN EUROPE - SCPE SCPE GUIDELINES JRC-SCPE Central Registry CODING CONGENITAL ANOMALIES SCPE Guidelines n°3 Version 1.0 2005-2006 3 Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe SCPE Guidelines – Coding congenital anomalies SCPE Guidelines Coding congenital anomalies - Version 1.0 Last revision: 2005-2006 Author: E Garne, H Dolk, EUROCAT Approved by: SCPE Data WG Aim: To help CP registers in collecting and coding congenital anomalies as recommended by EUROCAT To be disseminated to: – SCPE members – website (private part) Content: I. Recommendations from EUROCAT for collecting data and coding on Congenital malformations II. Coding proposals Appendix: Codes for malformations from the Q-chapter ICD10/BPA SCPE Guide SCPE Guidelines – G3 Coding congenital anomalies, EUROCAT recommendations – 2005-2006 Page 2 Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe SCPE Guidelines – Coding congenital anomalies I. Recommendations from EUROCAT for collecting data and coding on Congenital malformations. Cerebral malformations. Several classification systems for cerebral malformations have been proposed. A recent publication from Barkovich et al1 use a system based on the stage of development at which cortical development was first affected. For this classification system clinical information and neuro-imaging features are necessary. As the classification system requires access to the written text of the MR-scans it may be problematic for the SCPE-database. Other published classification systems are based on pathology or molecular genetics. For data analysis and comparing between registries it is important to take into account if the diagnosis is based on neuro-imaging information or if there was no neuro- imaging performed. The most simple classification system will be to follow the ICD10-codes, with BPA extensions. For coding of the malformations at inclusion in the database it is important to use the 3-digit Q codes in ICD10 and to give written text descriptions. Written text together with the Q-code is very important. The Q-chapter of ICD10 is grouped by organ system. Subgroups for the data analysis could be based on the 2 -digit chapters. For statistical analysis the chapters may be grouped to one group per organ system depending on the aim of the analysis. EUROCAT has recently re-defined their malformation subgroups for reporting prevalence and performing statistical surveillance. These subgroups are available at the website: http://www.eurocat.ulster.ac.uk/pubdata/Publications.html (to be updated). For coding of cleft palate and cleft lip it is important to be aware that only one ICD-code is used to describe the full facial defect. Cleft lip with or without cleft palate is etiologically different from cleft palate. Coding of complex cardiac malformations is difficult without knowledge of paediatric cardiology. Further many newborns requiring intensive care will have an echocardiography performed showing a patent ductus and/or a secundum ASD. These are normal phenomenon’s in the neonatal period and should only be considered a cardiac malformation if the defect persists during infancy. On the other hand, as the CP children are enrolled in the SCPE database at 4 years of age there may also be a group of children that have had a small VSD with early spontaneous closure not reported to the SCPE dataset. Syndromes and chromosomal anomalies. During the last decade an increasing number of syndromes can be related to microdeletions and diagnosed by DNA methods. Therefore the proportion of CP-cases with known syndromes will probably increase. Some of the children in the database may also, after the enrollment in the SCPE database, be diagnosed with a syndrome with or without a microdeletion. Diagnosis of a syndrome may be easier after the first year of life. Therefore by comparing data between EUROCAT and SCPE for the same time period, there may be more cases with diagnosed syndromes in the SCPE database than in the EUROCAT database. It is generally agreed among geneticists that microdeletions should be classified as syndromes and not as chromosomal anomalies. II. Coding proposals 1. All registries send specified written text information to the central SCPE registry. 2. Code microcephaly and hydrocephaly as a malformation only if they are not acquired. 3. Definition of a syndrome is given in EUROCAT Guide 6, available at the website: http://www.eurocat.ulster.ac.uk/pubdata/Publications.html. (web address to be updated). The guide also includes definitions of sequences and associations and gives the specified ICD10/BPA codes for many syndromes. 4. Chromosomal anomaly should only be coded if a chromosomal test is performed. Microdeletions should be classified as syndromes and not as chromosomal anomalies. 1 Barkovich AJ, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Guerrini R, Dobyns WB. A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development. Neurology. 2005 Dec 27;65(12):1873-87. Review. SCPE Guide SCPE Guidelines – G3 Coding congenital anomalies, EUROCAT recommendations – 2005-2006 Page 3 Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe SCPE Guidelines – Coding congenital anomalies 5. For optimal use of the variable “brain malformations”, it should be mentioned in the case report for each case, if the diagnosis is based on neuro-imaging or if this has not been performed. 6. It should be encouraged to use ICD10 3-digit codes. If this is not possible, written text is better than short codes. Further the use of unspecified codes should be avoided. 7. Congenital infections: code the infection as a syndrome if you are certain that this is the cause of CP (e.g. CMV with microcephaly), and describe the malformation(s) in brain and/or congenital items. If you are not sure of the aetiology, it should rather be coded under congenital anomaly. 8. Some disease pertaining to malformations are coded with ICD codes differ ent from ICD10-Q. They are listed at the end of the Appendix. SCPE Guide SCPE Guidelines – G3 Coding congenital anomalies, EUROCAT recommendations – 2005-2006 Page 4 Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe SCPE Guidelines – Coding congenital anomalies APPENDIX Codes for malformations from the Q-chapter ICD10/BPA Congenital malformations, deformations and chromosomal abnormalities Excludes: inborn errors of metabolism (E70-E90) This chapter contains the following blocks: Q00-Q07 Congenital malformations of the nervous system Q10-Q18 Congenital malformations of eye, ear, face and neck Q20-Q28 Congenital malformations of the circulatory system Q30-Q34 Congenital malformations of the respiratory system Q35-Q37 Cleft lip and palate Q38-Q45 Other congenital malformations of the digestive system Q50-Q56 Congenital malformations of genital organs Q60-Q64 Congenital malformations of the urinary system Q65-Q79 Congenital malformations and deformations of the musculoskeletal system Q80-Q89 Other congenital malformations Q90-Q99 Chromosomal abnormalities, not elsewhere classified Q00-Q07 Congenital malformations of the nervous system Q00 Anencephaly and similar malformations Q00.00 Anencephaly, NOS Acephaly Acrania Amyelencephaly Excludes: hydranencephaly (Q04.35) Q00.01 Incomplete anencephaly Hemianencephaly Hemicephaly Q00.1 Craniorachischisis Rachischisis: . craniospinal . complete . total Q00.2 Iniencephaly Q00.20 Iniencephaly, open Q00.21 Iniencephaly, closed Q01 Encephalocele Q02 Microcephaly Hydromicrocephaly Micrencephalon Excludes: Meckel-Gruber syndrome (Q61.9) microcephaly due to: . congenital infection (P35-P37) . exposure to ionising radiation (Q86.85) SCPE Guide SCPE Guidelines – G3 Coding congenital anomalies, EUROCAT recommendations – 2005-2006 Page 5 Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe SCPE Guidelines – Coding congenital anomalies Q03 Congenital hydrocephalus Includes: hydrocephalus in newborn Excludes: Arnold-Chiari syndrome (Q07.0) hydrocephalus: . acquired (G91.-) . due to congenital toxoplasmosis (P37.1) . with spina bifida (Q05.0-Q05.4) Q03.0 Malformations of aqueduct of Sylvius Aqueduct of Sylvius: . anomaly . obstruction, congenital . stenosis Q03.1 Atresia of foramina of Magendie and Luschka Dandy-Walker syndrome Q03.8 Other congenital hydrocephalus Q03.80 Clover leaf skull Kleeblattschaedel deformity syndrome Q03.9 Congenital hydrocephalus, unspecified Q04 Other congenital malformations of brain Excludes: cyclopia (Q87.03) macrocephaly (Q75.3) Q04.0 Congenital malformations of corpus callosum Q04.00 Agenesis of corpus callosum Q04.1 Arhinencephaly Q04.2 Holoprosencephaly Q04.3 Other reduction deformities of brain Absence } Agenesis } Aplasia } of part of brain Hypoplasia } Excludes: congenital malformations of corpus callosum (Q04.0) Q04.30 Reduction anomalies of cerebrum Q04.31 Reduction anomalies of hypothalamus Q04.32 Reduction anomalies of cerebellum Q04.33 Agyria or lissencephaly Q04.34 Microgyria or pachygyria Polygyria Micropolygyria Q04.35 Hydranencephaly Q04.4 Septo-optic dysplasia Q04.5 Megalencephaly Q04.6 Congenital cerebral cysts Porencephaly Schizencephaly Excludes: acquired porencephalic cysts (G93.0) Q04.60 Multiple congenital cerebral cysts Q04.61 Single congenital cerebral cyst Q04.8 Other specified congenital malformations of brain Macrogyria Walnut brain Congenital haematocephalus Congenital malformation of cerebral meninges Q04.9 Congenital malformation of brain, unspecified Q05 Spina bifida SCPE Guide SCPE Guidelines – G3 Coding congenital anomalies, EUROCAT recommendations – 2005-2006 Page 6 Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe SCPE Guidelines – Coding congenital anomalies
Recommended publications
  • Pfeiffer Syndrome Type II Discovered Perinatally
    Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (2012) 93, 785—789 CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector LETTER / Musculoskeletal imaging Pfeiffer syndrome type II discovered perinatally: Report of an observation and review of the literature a,∗ a a a H. Ben Hamouda , Y. Tlili , S. Ghanmi , H. Soua , b c b a S. Jerbi , M.M. Souissi , H. Hamza , M.T. Sfar a Unité de néonatologie, service de pédiatrie, CHU Tahar Sfar, 5111 Mahdia, Tunisia b Service de radiologie, CHU Tahar Sfar, 5111 Mahdia, Tunisia c Service de gynéco-obstétrique, CHU Tahar Sfar, 5111 Mahdia, Tunisia Pfeiffer syndrome, described for the first time by Pfeiffer in 1964, is a rare hereditary KEYWORDS condition combining osteochondrodysplasia with craniosynostosis [1]. This syndrome is Pfeiffer syndrome; also called acrocephalosyndactyly type 5, which is divided into three sub-types. Type I Cloverleaf skull; is the classic Pfeiffer syndrome, with autosomal dominant transmission, often associated Craniosynostosis; with normal intelligence. Types II and III occur as sporadic cases in individuals who have Syndactyly; craniosynostosis with broad thumbs, broad big toes, ankylosis of the elbows and visceral Prenatal diagnosis abnormalities [2]. We report a case of Pfeiffer syndrome type II, discovered perinatally, which is distinguished from type III by the skull appearing like a cloverleaf, and we shall discuss the clinical, radiological and evolutive features and the advantage of prenatal diagnosis of this syndrome with a review of the literature. Observation The case involved a male premature baby born at 36 weeks of amenorrhoea with multiple deformities at birth. The parents were not blood-related and in good health who had two other boys and a girl with normal morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly
    277 Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly KellenD.Winden,MD,PhD1 Christopher J. Yuskaitis, MD, PhD1 Annapurna Poduri, MD, MPH2 1 Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Address for correspondence Annapurna Poduri, Epilepsy Genetics Massachusetts Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2 Epilepsy Genetics Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Department of Neurology, Fegan 9, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Electrophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (e-mail: [email protected]). Semin Neurol 2015;35:277–287. Abstract Megalencephaly is a developmental disorder characterized by brain overgrowth secondary to increased size and/or numbers of neurons and glia. These disorders can be divided into metabolic and developmental categories based on their molecular etiologies. Metabolic megalencephalies are mostly caused by genetic defects in cellular metabolism, whereas developmental megalencephalies have recently been shown to be caused by alterations in signaling pathways that regulate neuronal replication, growth, and migration. These disorders often lead to epilepsy, developmental disabilities, and Keywords behavioral problems; specific disorders have associations with overgrowth or abnor- ► megalencephaly malities in other tissues. The molecular underpinnings of many of these disorders are ► hemimegalencephaly now understood, providing insight into how dysregulation of critical pathways leads to ►
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of Congenital Hand Anomalies
    G. C. Schwabe1 S. Mundlos2 Genetics of Congenital Hand Anomalies Die Genetik angeborener Handfehlbildungen Original Article Abstract Zusammenfassung Congenital limb malformations exhibit a wide spectrum of phe- Angeborene Handfehlbildungen sind durch ein breites Spektrum notypic manifestations and may occur as an isolated malforma- an phänotypischen Manifestationen gekennzeichnet. Sie treten tion and as part of a syndrome. They are individually rare, but als isolierte Malformation oder als Teil verschiedener Syndrome due to their overall frequency and severity they are of clinical auf. Die einzelnen Formen kongenitaler Handfehlbildungen sind relevance. In recent years, increasing knowledge of the molecu- selten, besitzen aber aufgrund ihrer Häufigkeit insgesamt und lar basis of embryonic development has significantly enhanced der hohen Belastung für Betroffene erhebliche klinische Rele- our understanding of congenital limb malformations. In addi- vanz. Die fortschreitende Erkenntnis über die molekularen Me- tion, genetic studies have revealed the molecular basis of an in- chanismen der Embryonalentwicklung haben in den letzten Jah- creasing number of conditions with primary or secondary limb ren wesentlich dazu beigetragen, die genetischen Ursachen kon- involvement. The molecular findings have led to a regrouping of genitaler Malformationen besser zu verstehen. Der hohe Grad an malformations in genetic terms. However, the establishment of phänotypischer Variabilität kongenitaler Handfehlbildungen er- precise genotype-phenotype correlations for limb malforma- schwert jedoch eine Etablierung präziser Genotyp-Phänotyp- tions is difficult due to the high degree of phenotypic variability. Korrelationen. In diesem Übersichtsartikel präsentieren wir das We present an overview of congenital limb malformations based Spektrum kongenitaler Malformationen, basierend auf einer ent- 85 on an anatomic and genetic concept reflecting recent molecular wicklungsbiologischen, anatomischen und genetischen Klassifi- and developmental insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Macrocephaly Information Sheet 6-13-19
    Next Generation Sequencing Panel for Macrocephaly Clinical Features: Macrocephaly refers to an abnormally large head, OFC greater than 98th percentile, inclusive of the scalp, cranial bone and intracranial contents. Megalencephaly, brain weight/volume ratio greater than 98th percentile, results from true enlargement of the brain parenchyma [1]. Megalencephaly is typically accompanied by macrocephaly, however macrocephaly can occur in the absence of megalencephaly [2]. Both macrocephaly and megalencephaly can been seen as isolated clinical findings as well as clinical features of a mutli-systemic syndromic diagnosis. Our Macrocephaly Panel includes analysis of the 36 genes listed below. Macrocephaly Sequencing Panel ASXL2 GLI3 MTOR PPP2R5D TCF20 BRWD3 GPC3 NFIA PTEN TBC1D7 CHD4 HEPACAM NFIX RAB39B UPF3B CHD8 HERC1 NONO RIN2 ZBTB20 CUL4B KPTN NSD1 RNF125 DNMT3A MED12 OFD1 RNF135 EED MITF PIGA SEC23B EZH2 MLC1 PPP1CB SETD2 Gene Clinical Features Details ASXL2 Shashi-Pena Shashi et al. (2016) found that six patients with developmental delay, syndrome macrocephaly, and dysmorphic features were found to have de novo truncating variants in ASXL2 [3]. Distinguishing features were macrocephaly, absence of growth retardation, and variability in the degree of intellectual disabilities The phenotype also consisted of prominent eyes, arched eyebrows, hypertelorism, a glabellar nevus flammeus, neonatal feeding difficulties and hypotonia. BRWD3 X-linked intellectual Truncating mutations in the BRWD3 gene have been described in males with disability nonsyndromic intellectual disability and macrocephaly [4]. Other features include a prominent forehead and large cupped ears. CHD4 Sifrim-Hitz-Weiss Weiss et al., 2016, identified five individuals with de novo missense variants in the syndrome CHD4 gene with intellectual disabilities and distinctive facial dysmorphisms [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Sotos Syndrome
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2007) 15, 264–271 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1018-4813/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/ejhg PRACTICAL GENETICS In association with Sotos syndrome Sotos syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition characterised by a distinctive facial appearance, learning disability and overgrowth resulting in tall stature and macrocephaly. In 2002, Sotos syndrome was shown to be caused by mutations and deletions of NSD1, which encodes a histone methyltransferase implicated in chromatin regulation. More recently, the NSD1 mutational spectrum has been defined, the phenotype of Sotos syndrome clarified and diagnostic and management guidelines developed. Introduction In brief Sotos syndrome was first described in 1964 by Juan Sotos Sotos syndrome is characterised by a distinctive facial and the major diagnostic criteria of a distinctive facial appearance, learning disability and childhood over- appearance, childhood overgrowth and learning disability growth. were established in 1994 by Cole and Hughes.1,2 In 2002, Sotos syndrome is associated with cardiac anomalies, cloning of the breakpoints of a de novo t(5;8)(q35;q24.1) renal anomalies, seizures and/or scoliosis in B25% of translocation in a child with Sotos syndrome led to the cases and a broad variety of additional features occur discovery that Sotos syndrome is caused by haploinsuffi- less frequently. ciency of the Nuclear receptor Set Domain containing NSD1 abnormalities, such as truncating mutations, protein 1 gene, NSD1.3 Subsequently, extensive analyses of missense mutations in functional domains, partial overgrowth cases have shown that intragenic NSD1 muta- gene deletions and 5q35 microdeletions encompass- tions and 5q35 microdeletions encompassing NSD1 cause ing NSD1, are identifiable in the majority (490%) of 490% of Sotos syndrome cases.4–10 In addition, NSD1 Sotos syndrome cases.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0210567 A1 Bevec (43) Pub
    US 2010O2.10567A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0210567 A1 Bevec (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 19, 2010 (54) USE OF ATUFTSINASATHERAPEUTIC Publication Classification AGENT (51) Int. Cl. A638/07 (2006.01) (76) Inventor: Dorian Bevec, Germering (DE) C07K 5/103 (2006.01) A6IP35/00 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: A6IPL/I6 (2006.01) WINSTEAD PC A6IP3L/20 (2006.01) i. 2O1 US (52) U.S. Cl. ........................................... 514/18: 530/330 9 (US) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 12/677,311 The present invention is directed to the use of the peptide compound Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-OH as a therapeutic agent for (22) PCT Filed: Sep. 9, 2008 the prophylaxis and/or treatment of cancer, autoimmune dis eases, fibrotic diseases, inflammatory diseases, neurodegen (86). PCT No.: PCT/EP2008/007470 erative diseases, infectious diseases, lung diseases, heart and vascular diseases and metabolic diseases. Moreover the S371 (c)(1), present invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions (2), (4) Date: Mar. 10, 2010 preferably inform of a lyophilisate or liquid buffersolution or artificial mother milk formulation or mother milk substitute (30) Foreign Application Priority Data containing the peptide Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-OH optionally together with at least one pharmaceutically acceptable car Sep. 11, 2007 (EP) .................................. O7017754.8 rier, cryoprotectant, lyoprotectant, excipient and/or diluent. US 2010/0210567 A1 Aug. 19, 2010 USE OF ATUFTSNASATHERAPEUTIC ment of Hepatitis BVirus infection, diseases caused by Hepa AGENT titis B Virus infection, acute hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, full minant liver failure, liver cirrhosis, cancer associated with Hepatitis B Virus infection. 0001. The present invention is directed to the use of the Cancer, Tumors, Proliferative Diseases, Malignancies and peptide compound Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-OH (Tuftsin) as a thera their Metastases peutic agent for the prophylaxis and/or treatment of cancer, 0008.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Misshapen Head: Craniosynostosis and Related Disorders Mark S
    CLINICAL REPORT Guidance for the Clinician in Rendering Pediatric Care Identifying the Misshapen Head: Craniosynostosis and Related Disorders Mark S. Dias, MD, FAAP, FAANS,a Thomas Samson, MD, FAAP,b Elias B. Rizk, MD, FAAP, FAANS,a Lance S. Governale, MD, FAAP, FAANS,c Joan T. Richtsmeier, PhD,d SECTION ON NEUROLOGIC SURGERY, SECTION ON PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY Pediatric care providers, pediatricians, pediatric subspecialty physicians, and abstract other health care providers should be able to recognize children with abnormal head shapes that occur as a result of both synostotic and aSection of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery and deformational processes. The purpose of this clinical report is to review the bDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of characteristic head shape changes, as well as secondary craniofacial Medicine and dDepartment of Anthropology, College of the Liberal Arts characteristics, that occur in the setting of the various primary and Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania; and cLillian S. Wells Department of craniosynostoses and deformations. As an introduction, the physiology and Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, genetics of skull growth as well as the pathophysiology underlying Florida craniosynostosis are reviewed. This is followed by a description of each type of Clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefit from primary craniosynostosis (metopic, unicoronal, bicoronal, sagittal, lambdoid, expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external reviewers. However, clinical reports from the American Academy of and frontosphenoidal) and their resultant head shape changes, with an Pediatrics may not reflect the views of the liaisons or the emphasis on differentiating conditions that require surgical correction from organizations or government agencies that they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Bagatelle Cassidy Syndrome: Macrocephaly
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Genetics Volume 1 | Issue 1 Case Report Open Access Bagatelle Cassidy Syndrome: Macrocephaly with Fronto-Facial Dysmorphism and Hearing Loss; an Extremely Rare Case Avina Fierro JA*1 and Hernandez Avina DA2 1Department of Pediatric Dysmorphology, IMSS Medical Center; Guadalajara, Mexico 2General Hospital Zona 2, IMSS Aguascalientes, Mexico *Corresponding author: Avina Fierro JA, Department of Pediatric Dysmorphology, IMSS Medical Center; Guadalajara, Mexico, Tel: (52)3336-743701, E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Avina Fierro JA, Hernandez Avina DA (2015) Bagatelle Cassidy Syndrome: Macrocephaly with Fronto-Facial Dysmorphism and Hearing Loss; an Extremely Rare Case. J Clin Exp Gen 1(1): 101 Abstract Bagatelle Cassidy syndrome is a very rare disease first described in 1995 in a boy with macrocephaly, hypertelorism, hearing loss, developmental delay and facial dysmorphism. The cause of this syndrome is unknown and has no specific diagnostic test. We report the case of a 9-year-old girl with a cerebro-fronto-facial malformation syndrome with macrocephaly, with significant decrease of the hearing, moderate hearing loss (50 db HL at 4000 Hz); mild mental retardation (IQ 50) and noticeable speech delay, psychomotor and developmental delay. Facial anomalies show prominent forehead (frontal bossing) , hypertelorism, downslanting palpebral fissures, flat nasal bridge, short nose with anteverted nostrils; broad columella, long smooth philtrum and carp-like mouth; this phenotype represents the specific
    [Show full text]
  • RIN2 Deficiency Results in Macrocephaly, Alopecia, Cutis Laxa
    REPORT RIN2 Deficiency Results in Macrocephaly, Alopecia, Cutis Laxa, and Scoliosis: MACS Syndrome Lina Basel-Vanagaite,1,2,14 Ofer Sarig,4,14 Dov Hershkovitz,6,7 Dana Fuchs-Telem,2,4 Debora Rapaport,3 Andrea Gat,5 Gila Isman,4 Idit Shirazi,4 Mordechai Shohat,1,2 Claes D. Enk,10 Efrat Birk,2 Ju¨rgen Kohlhase,11 Uta Matysiak-Scholze,11 Idit Maya,1 Carlos Knopf,9 Anette Peffekoven,12 Hans-Christian Hennies,12 Reuven Bergman,8 Mia Horowitz,3 Akemi Ishida-Yamamoto,13 and Eli Sprecher2,4,6,* Inherited disorders of elastic tissue represent a complex and heterogeneous group of diseases, characterized often by sagging skin and occasionally by life-threatening visceral complications. In the present study, we report on an autosomal-recessive disorder that we have termed MACS syndrome (macrocephaly, alopecia, cutis laxa, and scoliosis). The disorder was mapped to chromosome 20p11.21-p11.23, and a homozygous frameshift mutation in RIN2 was found to segregate with the disease phenotype in a large consan- guineous kindred. The mutation identified results in decreased expression of RIN2, a ubiquitously expressed protein that interacts with Rab5 and is involved in the regulation of endocytic trafficking. RIN2 deficiency was found to be associated with paucity of dermal micro- fibrils and deficiency of fibulin-5, which may underlie the abnormal skin phenotype displayed by the patients. Disorders of elastic tissue often share common phenotypic shown to result in decreased secretion of elastin.9,10 In features, including redundant skin, hyperlaxity of joints, addition,
    [Show full text]
  • Congenital Anomalies and in Utero Antiretroviral Exposure in Human Immunodeficiency Virus– Exposed Uninfected Infants
    Supplementary Online Content Williams PL, Crain MJ, Yildirim C, et al; Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study. Congenital anomalies and in utero antiretroviral exposure in human immunodeficiency virus– exposed uninfected infants. Published online November 10, 2014. JAMA Pediatr. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1889. eTable 1. Frequency of Specific Major Congenital Anomalies Within Anomaly Categories eTable 2. Anomalies Reported Among Children Exposed to Atazanavir During the First Trimester eTable 3. Association of Timing of the First ARV Exposure During Pregnancy With Congenital Anomalies by ARV Drug Class and for Specific ARV Drugs This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/24/2021 eTable 1. Frequency of Specific Major Congenital Anomalies Within Anomaly Categories # of children with at Total # of least one major anomaly in Anomaly anomalies category Category (Total=242) (Total=201) List of Major Anomalies Musculoskeletal 72 59 Polydactyly (15), torticollis/muscular anomaly (12), clubfoot, talipes, other foot deformity (9), congenital dislocation of hip (5), craniosynostosis (4), plagiocephaly (4), pectus excavatum/funnel chest (3), lower limb anomaly (3), hypertelorism/other face or skull anomaly (3), spina bifida occulta/spine anomaly (3), syndactyly (3), inguinal hernia (2), diaphragmatic hernia/Morgagni, genu recurvatum/bowed legs, rib/sternum anomaly, scoliosis/congenital
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Craniofacial Malformations Utilizing Animal Models
    CHAPTER SEVENTEEN From Bench to Bedside and Back: Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Craniofacial Malformations Utilizing Animal Models Alice F. Goodwin*,†, Rebecca Kim*,†, Jeffrey O. Bush*,{,},1, Ophir D. Klein*,†,},},1 *Program in Craniofacial Biology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA †Department of Orofacial Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA { Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA } Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA } Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 1Corresponding authors: e-mail address: [email protected]; [email protected] Contents 1. Models to Uncover Genetics of Cleft Lip and Palate 460 2. Treacher Collins: Proof of Concept of a Nonsurgical Therapeutic for a Craniofacial Syndrome 467 3. RASopathies: Understanding and Developing Treatment for Syndromes of the RAS Pathway 468 4. Craniosynostosis: Pursuing Genetic and Pharmaceutical Alternatives to Surgical Treatment 473 5. XLHED: Developing Treatment Based on Knowledge Gained from Mouse and Canine Models 477 6. Concluding Thoughts 481 Acknowledgments 481 References 481 Abstract Craniofacial anomalies are among the most common birth defects and are associated with increased mortality and, in many cases, the need for lifelong treatment. Over the past few decades, dramatic advances in the surgical and medical care of these patients have led to marked improvements in patient outcomes. However, none of the treat- ments currently in clinical use address the underlying molecular causes of these disor- ders. Fortunately, the field of craniofacial developmental biology provides a strong foundation for improved diagnosis and for therapies that target the genetic causes # Current Topics in Developmental Biology, Volume 115 2015 Elsevier Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Spondylocostal Dysplasia and Neural Tube Defects
    J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.28.1.51 on 1 January 1991. Downloaded from 3'Med Genet 1991; 28: 51-53 51 Spondylocostal dysplasia and neural tube defects George P Giacoia, Burhan Say Abstract cage resulting in short trunked dwarfism. It has been Spondylocostal dysplasia Uarcho-Levin syndrome) variously reported as Jarcho-Levin syndrome, comprises multiple malformations of the vertebrae 'hereditary multiple hemivertebrae', 'bizarre vertebral and ribs coupled with a characteristic clinical anomalies', 'costovertebral dysplasia', and Covesdem picture of short neck, scoliosis, short trunk, and syndrome when associated with mesomelic shortening deformity of the rib cage. We describe a patient ofthe limbs. Despite the major vertebral segmentation with the syndrome who also had spina bifida and defects, including spina bifida occulta, spondylocostal diastematomyelia. We surmise that this association dysplasia is considered unrelated to neural tube is not coincidental. Additional evidence is needed defects.' to support the hypothesis that spondylocostal The purpose of this paper is to present a case of dysplasia and neural tube defects are aetiologicaily spondylocostal dysplasia associated with spina bifida related. and diastematomyelia and to review the pertinent published reports. Spondylocostal dysplasia is a congenital disorder with multiple abnormalities of the vertebrae and thoracic Case report The proband, a male, was born to a 28 year old woman after a 38 week, uncomplicated pregnancy. Department of Pediatrics, The University of Oklahoma Apgar scores were 4 and 7 at one and five minutes, College of Medicine, 6161 South Yale, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, USA. respectively. Shortly after birth, the infant had G P Giacoia, B Say considerable respiratory difficulty requiringintubation http://jmg.bmj.com/ Correspondence to Professor Giacoia.
    [Show full text]