Security Council
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNITED NATIONS __.___.__~ Security Council RIOVISIONAL s/av.2923 29 May 1990 ENGLISH PitOVfSIDNAL VERBATIM RKCDRDOFTRE ‘IWOTIOUSm WINE BD&RED &ND ‘IWENTY-TBIRDMEETIEG Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, cm Friday, 25 May 1990, at 3 p.m. Presidentr Mr. ‘ItlRNUDD (Finlmd) Melh?tSt Canada Mr. PDRTIBR China Mr. DIblG Yuanhonq calold ia Mr. RIVE POSADA c&t2 a*Ivoire Mr. Rwi’ Cuba Mr. ALmODN de QUEsADA Ethiopia Mr. TAD&SE FraWX Mr. BLkBC MalaYS ii3 Mr. RA!i%LI Roraania Mr. MUN%Ei!EU Union of Soviet Socialist &publics Mr. WIONPOV United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Sir Ctiepin TIQ(ELL United States of America Mr. PIGZl%ING Yemen Mr. AL-&WI Zaire Mr.BAW?NI ADEICM) CBlDJGZEw Thie record contains the original text of smeches Llivered in English ard interpretations of speeches in the otha languages. The final text will ba printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to original speeches only. They should be sent under the signature of a metier of the delegation anxerned, within cne week, to the Chief. Official &cords Bditiw Section, Uapartment of Conference Servicea, room DC2-750, 2 United Nation8 Plaza, and inoorpbrated in a sow of the record. Qo- 60523/A 7788-9ov (El S/P& 2923 2 The meeting was called to order at 3.30 p.m. ADWPIGN OF TB3 AGSNDA The- agenda was aQpted. THE SJXJATION IN THEi QCCUPIRD ARAB ‘IERRITGRIES IETTER DATED 21 RAY 1990 FRCM THE PEIWWmT RRPRESWIATIVE OF BAHRAIN T3 THE UNI‘mD NATIONS ADDRESSED ‘ID TRE PRESIDENT OF TWI SECURITY aXlNC.IL (S/21300) The PRWIDRNT: I should like to inform tbe Counc,il that I have received letters from the representatives of Bahrain, Bangladesh, Egypt, Gabon, India, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, the Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, %Wkey, the United grab Emirates and Yugoslavia in which they request &at they be invited to participate in the diwussion of the item on the Council’s agenda. In accordance with the usual practice, I propose, with tie consent of the Council, to invite those representatives to participate in the discussion, without the right to vote, in conformity with the relevant provision5 of the Charter and rule 37 of the Council’s prOVisional rule5 of procedure. There being no objection, it is so decided. At the invitetion of the President, Mr. Al-Raharna (Bahrain), Mr. Har un-ur-Raehid (Bangladesh), Mr. Elaraby (Egypt), Mr. Lekounda-Raumy (Gabon), Ms. Puri (India), Mr. Nasseri (Islamic Republic of Iran), Mr. Al-Ikriti (Iraq), Mr. Netanyahu (Israel), Mr. Salah (Jordan), Mr. Al-Gsaimi (Kuwait), Mr. Ramdan (-banon), Mr. Renhima (Morocco), Mr. Al-Ni’mah (Qatar), Mr. Shihabi (Saudi . ..^L.^. m-^^--L--^- ,I-. ---I--. ,---a- .^^L --.J-\‘-, SX.CWA~,) Mr. naocl~ub.bo~utar* ranuaj, Sii. AZ-EGGi: ,0X‘ *aI, ts‘Qk.4rp;p.w*rt., # Mr. Ghezal (Tunisia), Mr. hrna (Rlrkey), Mr. Abdullah (Dnited Arab Emirates) and Mr. Rosin (Yugoslavia) took the places reserved for them at the side of the Council Chatier . JP/ve S/Pv.2923 3 The PRESlDBJTr I should like to inform the Council that I have received a letter dated 22 Hay 1990 from the Permanent observer of Pales tine to the United Nations, which has been issued a8 document S/21306, and which reads as follows: “I have the honour to request that, in accordance with its previou practice, the Security Council invite His ESrcellency President Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organisationr to participate in the current debate of the Security Council. * The request is not made pursuant to rule 37 or rule 39 of the provisional rules of procedure of the Security Council, but if it were approved the Council would invite the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organisation to participate, not under rule 37 or rule 39, but with the 8ame right8 of participation as under rule 37. Doe8 any metier of the Security Council wish to speak M this request? Mr. PICXxWlNG (United States of Americajt The United States, as it notlaally does when this question ie considered, uill request a vote on the proposal before the Security Council, and the United jtates will vote against it an two grounds. First, we believe that the Council doe8 not have before it a valid request to speak. Secondly, the United States maintains that the Palestine Liberation Organization (PI4 should be granted permission to speak anly if the request canpliea with rule 39 of the rules of procedure. In our view it i8 unwarranted and unwise for the Cauncil to break with its own practice and rules. A8 member8 of the Council, we should a& ourselves this question; Doe5 a m . aacislon to break with our rules and prweduies Bril&Z* Or diminish the -VUllrLL#--.a.r,* , t ability to play a constructive role in the Middle East peaoe process? My delegation firmly believes it diminiahes the Council's ability to play such a role. JP/ve s/Pv. 2923 4-5 (Mr. Picker ins, United States) Jb all members of the Council are aware, it is a long-established practice that observers do not have the right to speak 5n the Security Council at their cwn tf?quest . Rather, a request must be made ar the observer’s behalf by a Member State. My Government sees no justification for any departure from that practice. It 58 also clear that General Assembly resolutions are not binding an the Security Council. Further, there is nothing in reaolutfons recently adopted by the Assembly that would warrant a change in Security Council practice. General Assembly resolution 43/177, which purported to change the designation of the PXD Mission, did so “without prejudice to the observer status and functions of the Palest !.ne Liberation Organfzatiar within the United Nations system in conformity with relevant UnPted Natfona resolutfons and practice”. That resolutfa does not constitute recognition of any Stite of Palestine. Like many other Merrbers of the United NatLons, the United Statea &es not reoognise such a State. JP/m4 s/Pv. 2923 6 (Mr. Pickering8 United States) The United States has consistently taken the pasiticn that under the provisional rules of procedure of the Security Council the only legal basis ~1 which the Council may grant a hearing ti persons speaking on behalf of non-governmanta entities is rule 39. For four decades the United States has supported a generous interpretation of rule 39, and it would not have objected had this matter been appropriately raised under that rule. We arer havever, opposed to special, ad hoc departures from orderly procedure. The l.bited States tZOnf3qUentlY Opposes granting to the Palestine Liberation Organization the saam rights to participate in the proceedings of the Security Council as if that organization represented a Member State of the United Nations. We believe In listening to all points of view, but not in a manner that requires violating the rules. In particular, the United States &es not agree with the recent practice of the Security Council that appears selectively to try to enhance the prestige of three who wish to speak in the Council through a dee,parture from the rules of procedure. We consider this special practice to be without legal foun&tion at3 to conf3titute an abuse of the rules. FOr all these reasons the United States requests that the term of the proposed invitation bs put to the vote. Of course, the tlhited State8 will vote against the proposal. The RiESlUIDENTt Sf no other nxxber of the Ccuncil wishes to speak at this stage, I ehall take it that the Council is ready to vote an the request by Palestine. xt it3 80 aecised. I therefore nw Put to the vote the request by Palestine. s/w. 292 3 7 A vote vas taken by shw of hands. In favour: China, Colombia, C&e d’Ivoire, Cuba, Ethiopia, Finland, Malaysia, mmania, uliar of Soviet Socialist Republics, Yemen, Zaire Against: United States of America Abstaining: Canada, FraiWer United Kingdom of Great Rritain and Northern Ireland The PRESIDENT: The result of the voting is as follws% 11 votes in favour, 1 against and 3 abstentions. The request has been approved. At the invitation of the President, Mr. Arafat (Palestine) took a place at the Council table. The PRESIDENT: I should like to inform the Council that t have received a letter dated 24 My 1990 from the Chairman of the committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, whi& reads as followat “I have the haour to request that I be allowed to participate in the SeCUritY COUnCil’S consideration of the item ‘The situation in the occupied Arab territories’, in accordance with rule 39 of the Council’s prcvisiiYla1 rules of gxocedure, in my capacity as Chaimm of the Committee an the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.* On prsvious occasions the security Council has extended invitations ta representatives of other uritea Rations bodies in connection with the consideration of matters on it5 agenda. In accordance with past practice in this nratter, I propose that the Council extend an invitation under rule 39 of its ptovisiontrl rules of procedure to the Chairman of the committee on the Eltercise of the Inal ienable Rights of the Palestin ian People. There being no objection, it ia so decidsd. JVtWM S/W. 2923 8 (The President) I should like ta inform the Council that I have received a letter dated 24 May 1990 from the Chatg6 d’affaires of the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Xkmen to the United Nations, which reeds as follows: “I have the honour to request that the Security Council extend an invitation under rule 39 of its provisional rules of edure to His E5tcellenoy Ambassador Clovis Maksoud, Permanent Observer of the League of Arab States to the United Nations, during the Council’s discussiar of the item prt33ently on its agenda.