Lexical Patterns in ASL and English a Dissertation Submitted in Pa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lexical Patterns in ASL and English a Dissertation Submitted in Pa UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Motivation in Morphology: Lexical Patterns in ASL and English A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics by Ryan Lepic Committee in charge: Professor Farrell Ackerman, Co-Chair Professor Carol Padden, Co-Chair Professor Karen Emmorey Professor Rachel Mayberry Professor Sharon Rose 2015 The Dissertation of Ryan Lepic is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2015 iii EPIGRAPH "I believe that we social anthropologists are like the mediaeval Ptolemaic astronomers; we spend our time trying to fit the facts of the objective world into the framework of a set of concepts which have been developed a priori instead of from observation…. The trouble with Ptolemaic astronomy was not that it was wrong but that it was sterile—there could be no real development until Galileo was prepared to abandon the basic premise that celestial bodies must of necessity move in perfect circles with the earth at the center of the universe." Edmund Leach iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ........................................................................................................ iii Epigraph ................................................................................................................. iv Table of Contents ................................................................................................... v List of Examples .................................................................................................... viii List of Tables ......................................................................................................... xiii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... xiv Vita ....................................................................................................................... xvii Abstract of the Dissertation ................................................................................. xviii Chapter 1 Motivation in Morphology .................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Complex word-internal structure ................................................................. 2 1.3 A morpheme-based approach ...................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Guiding assumptions ............................................................................ 5 1.3.2 A first pass at ASL morphology ........................................................... 8 1.3.3 Assessment of the morpheme-based approach .................................... 16 1.4 A word-based approach ............................................................................... 22 1.4.1 Guiding assumptions ............................................................................ 22 1.4.2 An alternative approach to complex words in ASL and English ......... 28 1.4.3 Assessment of the word-based approach ............................................. 38 1.5 Outline of the dissertation ............................................................................ 44 Chapter 2 A Construction-Theoretic Approach to Compounding ......................... 47 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 47 2.2 Construction-theoretic morphology ............................................................. 50 2.2.1 Overlap in word- and construction-based approaches ......................... 50 2.2.2 Compounding in Construction Morphology ........................................ 53 2.2.3 Compounds and lexicalization ............................................................. 58 2.3 English compounds ..................................................................................... 63 2.3.1 Classificatory compounds .................................................................... 63 2.3.2 Plant and animal names ....................................................................... 65 2.3.3 "Affixoids" are schematic compounding constructions ....................... 69 2.3.4 Schematic vs. analogical compounding ............................................... 73 2.4 ASL compounds .......................................................................................... 78 2.4.1 Lexicalization in ASL .......................................................................... 78 v 2.4.2 Signed compounds ............................................................................... 84 2.4.3 Fingerspelling-sign compounds ........................................................... 88 2.4.4 Compounds and lexicalization revisited .............................................. 94 2.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 99 Chapter 3 Initialized Signs in ASL ........................................................................ 101 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 101 3.2 Background .................................................................................................. 104 3.2.1 English or ASL? ................................................................................... 104 3.2.2 Properties of initialized signs ............................................................... 108 3.2.3 The American Sign Language Handshape Dictionary ......................... 112 3.3 Dictionary study ........................................................................................... 117 3.3.1 Identifying initialized signs in the ASLHD ......................................... 117 3.3.2 Phonological analysis ........................................................................... 119 3.3.3 Semantic analysis ................................................................................. 126 3.4 Initialized sign constructions ....................................................................... 136 3.4.1 Lexical families are schematic morphological constructions .............. 136 3.4.2 The morphological status of initialized handshapes ............................ 140 3.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 143 Appendix to Chapter 3. 286 Initialized Signs (Tennant and Brown 2010) ....... 145 Chapter 4 A Construction-Theoretic Analysis of ASL Lexical Families .............. 153 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 153 4.2 Previous approaches to lexical families ....................................................... 155 4.2.1 Lexical families in ASL ....................................................................... 155 4.2.2 S-morphs and P-morphs ....................................................................... 158 4.2.3 Ion-morphs ........................................................................................... 162 4.3 Lexical families are morphological constructions ....................................... 170 4.3.1 The primary role of words .................................................................... 170 4.3.2 Nuclear families ................................................................................... 171 4.3.3 Extended families ................................................................................. 177 4.4 Overlapping pockets of systematicity in the ASL lexicon .......................... 180 4.4.1 Numeral incorporation ......................................................................... 180 4.4.2 Numeral incorporation and initialization ............................................. 185 4.4.3 A phonology-morphology continuum .................................................. 190 4.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 197 Chapter 5 Lexical Blends and Lexical Patterns in English and in ASL ............... 199 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 199 5.2 Previous linguistic studies of lexical blends ................................................ 201 5.2.1 Classificatory approaches ..................................................................... 201 5.2.2 Phonological approaches ...................................................................... 205 5.3 Lexical blends in English ............................................................................. 207 5.3.1 A constructional template for lexical blends ........................................ 207 vi 5.3.2 Variation in splinter-formations ........................................................... 213 5.3.3 A construction-theoretic analysis of blend families ............................. 220 5.4 Lexical blends in ASL ................................................................................. 226 5.4.1 Lexical blends as combinations of signs .............................................. 226 5.4.2 Lexical blends as combinations of lexical families .............................. 231 5.4.3 Discriminable differences in ASL morphology ................................... 234 5.5 Conclusion ....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sign Language Endangerment and Linguistic Diversity Ben Braithwaite
    RESEARCH REPORT Sign language endangerment and linguistic diversity Ben Braithwaite University of the West Indies at St. Augustine It has become increasingly clear that current threats to global linguistic diversity are not re - stricted to the loss of spoken languages. Signed languages are vulnerable to familiar patterns of language shift and the global spread of a few influential languages. But the ecologies of signed languages are also affected by genetics, social attitudes toward deafness, educational and public health policies, and a widespread modality chauvinism that views spoken languages as inherently superior or more desirable. This research report reviews what is known about sign language vi - tality and endangerment globally, and considers the responses from communities, governments, and linguists. It is striking how little attention has been paid to sign language vitality, endangerment, and re - vitalization, even as research on signed languages has occupied an increasingly prominent posi - tion in linguistic theory. It is time for linguists from a broader range of backgrounds to consider the causes, consequences, and appropriate responses to current threats to sign language diversity. In doing so, we must articulate more clearly the value of this diversity to the field of linguistics and the responsibilities the field has toward preserving it.* Keywords : language endangerment, language vitality, language documentation, signed languages 1. Introduction. Concerns about sign language endangerment are not new. Almost immediately after the invention of film, the US National Association of the Deaf began producing films to capture American Sign Language (ASL), motivated by a fear within the deaf community that their language was endangered (Schuchman 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Arabic and Contact-Induced Change Christopher Lucas, Stefano Manfredi
    Arabic and Contact-Induced Change Christopher Lucas, Stefano Manfredi To cite this version: Christopher Lucas, Stefano Manfredi. Arabic and Contact-Induced Change. 2020. halshs-03094950 HAL Id: halshs-03094950 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03094950 Submitted on 15 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Arabic and contact-induced change Edited by Christopher Lucas Stefano Manfredi language Contact and Multilingualism 1 science press Contact and Multilingualism Editors: Isabelle Léglise (CNRS SeDyL), Stefano Manfredi (CNRS SeDyL) In this series: 1. Lucas, Christopher & Stefano Manfredi (eds.). Arabic and contact-induced change. Arabic and contact-induced change Edited by Christopher Lucas Stefano Manfredi language science press Lucas, Christopher & Stefano Manfredi (eds.). 2020. Arabic and contact-induced change (Contact and Multilingualism 1). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/235 © 2020, the authors Published under the Creative Commons Attribution
    [Show full text]
  • Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation Through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Linguistics ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2009 Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds Recommended Citation Wilkinson, Erin. "Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology." (2009). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/40 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TYPOLOGY OF SIGNED LANGUAGES: DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY BY ERIN LAINE WILKINSON B.A., Language Studies, Wellesley College, 1999 M.A., Linguistics, Gallaudet University, 2001 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Linguistics The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico August, 2009 ©2009, Erin Laine Wilkinson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii DEDICATION To my mother iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to Barbara Pennacchi for kick starting me on my dissertation by giving me a room at her house, cooking me dinner, and making Italian coffee in Rome during November 2007. Your endless support, patience, and thoughtful discussions are gratefully taken into my heart, and I truly appreciate what you have done for me. I heartily acknowledge Dr. William Croft, my advisor, for continuing to encourage me through the long number of months writing and rewriting these chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • FOT XXVIII 2019 Holmström, Mesch, Schönström
    Teckenspråksforskningen under 2000-talet En översikt Ingela Holmström Johanna Mesch Krister Schönström Sammanfattning Det finns många olika inriktningar inom teckenspråksforskningen idag och en avsevärd mängd studier utifrån olika perspektiv och på olika språkliga nivåer. I den här forskningsrapporten görs en översikt över svensk och internationell teckenspråksforskning under 2000-talet, med särskilt fokus på allmän språkvetenskap. Rapporten berör dock även kognitiv lingvistik, psyko- och neurolingvistik samt sociolingvistik. Dessutom fokuseras i ett varsitt avsnitt barns teckenspråk och inlärning av teckenspråk som andraspråk. Det som tas upp är ett urval av den forskning som bedrivits och rapporten gör inte anspråk på att vara heltäckande, men ger utöver de översiktliga beskrivningarna också ett stort antal referenser för fortsatt egen läsning inom de olika områden som tas upp. Nyckelord teckenspråksforskning, lingvistik, teckenspråksgrammatik Innehållsförteckning Förkortningar och transkriptionsnyckel .................................................... i 1. Förord ............................................................................................. 1 2. Inledning ........................................................................................ 1 3. Allmän språkvetenskap ................................................................... 2 3.1. Fonologi ...................................................................................................... 2 3.1.1. Teckenstruktur .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research Brief: the Importance of Fingerspelling for Reading
    VISUAL LANGUAGE & VISUAL LEARNING NSF supported Science of Learning Center on Visual Language and Visual Learning, SBE-0541953, RESEARCH BRIEF: Gallaudet University. THE IMPORTANCE OF FINGERSPELLING FOR READING JULY 2010 Key Findings on the Importance of Fingerspelling for Reading: LEARNING FROM RESEARCH • Deaf families fingerspell to their deaf children when they are very young. • Early exposure to fingerspelling helps these children become better # 1 readers. • Fingerspelling, reading, and writing are interrelated. • Fingerspelling facilitates English vocabulary growth, and larger the lexicon, the faster new vocabulary is learned. • Fingerspelling positively correlates with stronger reading skills. Deaf Written by: and hard of hearing children who are good fingerspellers are good Sharon Baker, Ed.D. readers, and vice versa. 1 of 8 NSF SCIENCE OF LEARNING CENTER ON VISUAL LANGUAGE AND VISUAL LEARNING RESEARCH BRIEF NO. 1: THE IMPORTANCE OF FINGERSPELLING FOR READING Fingerspelling and American Sign hearing children from deaf families tend to read at Language higher levels than deaf and hard of hearing children from hearing families.11 Fingerspelling likely On the most simplistic level, fingerspelling can be contributes to this success. Unfortunately, young defined as the use of handshapes to represent deaf and hard of hearing children from hearing letters of the alphabet. Indeed, before the families are not generally given the same early complexity of fingerspelling was documented, learning opportunity. Indeed, the absence of researchers thought fingerspelling was merely a fingerspelling is particularly evident in preschools manual representation of English orthography for deaf and hard of hearing children.9 To 1 (print). They believed fingerspelling was primarily understand the role of fingerspelling in language for representing proper nouns or for English words acquisition and later literacy, it is important to 2,3 without a sign equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponyms in Ban Khor Sign Language | Angela M
    Toponyms in Ban Khor Sign Language | Angela M. Nonaka 66 Toponyms in Ban Khor Sign Language Angela M. Nonaka The University of Texas at Austin (USA) [email protected] Introduction Ban Khor Sign Language (BKSL) is a rare language variety known as a ‘village’ (Zeshan 2004) or ‘indigenous’ (Woodward 2000) sign language. This type of sign language develops in small face-to-face communities where historically there are/were: 1) demographically `1#$%%%%}`` #####$}`T$ } ~` $ #} ` %T$!;# characteristics of the language ecologies of signing village communities, however, involve their local language ideologies and practices. In such communities, there are no sign language interpreters. Instead, it is common not only for deaf people but also for hearing residents to acquire and use the village sign language. Because it is widely used by both deaf and hearing people in the course of everyday life, the village sign language facilitates the inclusion (vs. exclusion) of deaf members of the community. Villages with indigenous sign languages are unusual but have been found elsewhere: in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Australia and Oceania, the Caribbean, and the Middle East (Branson & ^}@!}#$$}}} }@}X;}$¥}}¨}¨ }~}=#}=$}=~¥ $}=¥}=}+#¢^$}+ }^+¥}^}^%#¢<}^!} ~$}¥}!}\ !}}*!}*$}*#};! }@}$¥}`!* communities’ alternative social constructions of and communicative responses to deafness is enriching anthropological understanding of cultural variation, and research on the local sign languages is expanding knowledge of linguistics in areas such as: documentary linguistics, typological linguistics, historical linguistics, language universals, and so on. In anthropological linguistics, there is a robust literature on onomastics—the study of the origin and forms of proper names (personal, place, brand, etc.). Names are interesting and useful phenomena for linguistic and cultural analysis because naming systems and practices mirror and order the social world.
    [Show full text]
  • Formational Units in Sign Languages Sign Language Typology 3
    Formational Units in Sign Languages Sign Language Typology 3 Editors Marie Coppola Onno Crasborn Ulrike Zeshan Editorial board Sam Lutalo-Kiingi Irit Meir Ronice Müller de Quadros Roland Pfau Adam Schembri Gladys Tang Erin Wilkinson Jun Hui Yang De Gruyter Mouton · Ishara Press Formational Units in Sign Languages Edited by Rachel Channon Harry van der Hulst De Gruyter Mouton · Ishara Press ISBN 978-1-61451-067-3 e-ISBN 978-1-61451-068-0 ISSN 2192-5186 e-ISSN 2192-5194 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Formational units in sign languages / edited by Rachel Channon and Harry van der Hulst. p. cm. Ϫ (Sign language typology ; 3) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-61451-067-3 (hbk. : alk. paper) 1. Sign language Ϫ Phonology, Comparative. 2. Grammar, Comparative and general Ϫ Phonology, Comparative. I. Channon, Rachel, 1950Ϫ II. Hulst, Harry van der. P117.F68 2011 419Ϫdc23 2011033587 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. Ą 2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston and Ishara Press, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Printing: Hubert & Co. GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen ϱ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Contents Introduction: Phonetics, Phonology, Iconicity and Innateness Rachel Channon and Harry van der Hulst ...................................................1 Part I. Observation Marked Hand Configurations in Asian Sign Languages Susan Fischer and Qunhu Gong .................................................................19 The phonetics and phonology of the TİD (Turkish Sign Language) bimanual alphabet Okan Kubus and Annette Hohenberger (University of Hamburg and Middle East Technical University) .......................................................43 Child-directed signing as a linguistic register Ginger Pizer, Richard P.
    [Show full text]
  • Voicing the Voiceless: Feminism and Contemporary Arab Muslim Women's Autobiographies
    VOICING THE VOICELESS: FEMINISM AND CONTEMPORARY ARAB MUSLIM WOMEN'S AUTOBIOGRAPHIES Taghreed Mahmoud Abu Sarhan A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2011 Committee: Ellen Berry, Advisor Vibha Bhalla Graduate Faculty Representative Radhika Gajjala Erin Labbie iii ABSTRACT Ellen Berry, Advisor Arab Muslim women have been portrayed by the West in general and Western Feminism in particular as oppressed, weak, submissive, and passive. A few critics, Nawar al-Hassan Golley, is an example, clarify that Arab Muslim women are not weak and passive as they are seen by the Western Feminism viewed through the lens of their own culture and historical background. Using Transnational Feminist theory, my study examines four autobiographies: Harem Years By Huda Sha’arawi, A Mountainous Journey a Poet’s Autobiography by Fadwa Tuqan, A Daughter of Isis by Nawal El Saadawi, and Dreams of Trespass, Tales of a Harem Girlhood by Fatima Mernissi. This study promises to add to the extant literature that examine Arab Muslim women’s status by viewing Arab women’s autobiographies as real life stories to introduce examples of Arab Muslim women figures who have effected positive and significant changes for themselves and their societies. Moreover, this study seeks to demonstrate, through the study of select Arab Muslim women’s autobiographies, that Arab Muslim women are educated, have feminist consciousnesses, and national figures with their own clear reading of their own religion and culture, more telling than that of the reading of outsiders.
    [Show full text]
  • Usted Es Haragán Pero Vos Sos Lazy: Initialization in Honduran Sign Language
    USTED ES HARAGÁN PERO VOS SOS LAZY: INITIALIZATION IN HONDURAN SIGN LANGUAGE by Peter T. Cahill University of Pittsburgh, B.Phil, 2012 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of University of Pittsburgh in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor‟s of Philosophy in Linguistics & International & Area Studies University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCIENCES UNIVERSITY HONORS COLLEGE This thesis was presented by Peter T. Cahill It was defended on February 29, 2012 and approved by Judy Shepard-Kegl, Professor, Linguistics, University of Southern Maine Scott Kiesling, Associate Professor, Linguistics Helen Stickney, Visiting Assistant Professor, Linguistics Thesis Advisor: Claude Mauk, Lecturer, Linguistics ii Copyright © by Peter T. Cahill 2012 iii USTED ES HARAGÁN PERO VOS SOS LAZY: INITIALIZATION IN HONDURAN SIGN LANGAUGE Peter T. Cahill University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Initialization, an outcome of language contact common to signed languages, has become a global phenomenon. I define initialization as the incorporation of the orthography of a word of a dominant spoken language via the cultural construct of a manual orthography into signs with a semantic correspondence to that word. Despite its being very common within (relatively) well- documented sign languages such as American Sign Language (Padden & Brentari, 2001), Australian Sign Language (Schembri & Johnston, 2007) and Québec Sign Language (Machabée, 1995), the literature on the subject is very small. To assist in expanding the nascent fields of sociolinguistics and anthropology of Deaf communities, ethnographic research involving primarily corpus building, interviews and participant observation was performed within the Deaf community of central Honduras to offer preliminary insights into how the personal and group identities of the Honduran Deaf are negotiated through linguistic interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Time Depth and Typology of Rural Sign Languages Connie De Vos, Victoria Nyst
    The Time Depth and Typology of Rural Sign Languages Connie De Vos, Victoria Nyst Sign Language Studies, Volume 18, Number 4, Summer 2018, pp. 477-487 (Article) Published by Gallaudet University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2018.0013 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/702981 Access provided by Max Planck Society (18 Dec 2018 08:31 GMT) CONNIE DE VOS AND VICTORIA NYST The Time Depth and Typology of Rural Sign Languages Irit Meir sadly passed away right after the issue was accepted for publication. We wish to honor her for her immense contribution to the field of sign language linguistics, including the study of emerging sign languages, by dedicating this issue to her. This special issue of Sign Language Studies is focused on recent developments in the study of rural sign languages, which have arisen from the spontaneous interactions between deaf and hearing in- dividuals in rural communities with high incidences of deafness. With the exception of a few preliminary studies, such as the one on the now-extinct Martha’s Vineyard community (Groce 1985) and the work on Providence Island Sign Language (e.g. Washabaugh, Woodward, and DeSantis 1978), the linguistic documentation and description of these sign languages did not really take off until the early 2000s (de Vos and Pfau 2015). Importantly, rural sign languages are only one part of the linguistic landscape, which includes the urban sign languages of national deaf communities whether they have emerged recently, as happened in the case of Nicaragua (Senghas and Coppola 2001), or are in fact presumed to have a long-standing history (Zeshan and Palfreyman 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • SIGN 127 EFFECTIVE: Summer 2011 Launched
    Meeting Date: 11/14/2006 SIGN 127 EFFECTIVE: Summer 2011 Launched Modesto Junior College Course Outline of Record SIGN 127 I. OVERVIEW The following information will appear in the 2011 - 2012 catalog SIGN 127 ASL: Advanced Communication With the Deaf 3 Units Formerly listed as: SIGN - 127: Asl: Advanced Communication With the Deaf Prerequisite: Satisfactory completion of SIGN 126. Extensive development of and practice in American Sign Language for those who would like to interpret for the Deaf or for those want to become professionals working in the Deaf community. Field trips might be required. (A-F or P/NP - Student choice) Lecture Transfer: (CSU, UC) General Education: (MJC-GE: C ) (CSU-GE: C2 ) (IGETC: 3B, 6A ) II. LEARNING CONTEXT Given the following learning context, the student who satisfactorily completes this course should be able to achieve the goals specified in Section III, Desired Learning: A. COURSE CONTENT 1. Required Content: a. Intense review of fingerspelling, numbers, and glosses i. Number placement and subject referencing to include location and ordination ii. Number referencing for complex number signs including money, finances, age, sports, measurement and scientific numbers iii. Number signs iv. Non-specific number signs v. Sign formation, appropriate use, and origination vi. Receptive and expressive signed numbers vii. Pronoun referencing including numbers viii. Sign number use with and without contextual clues ix. Fingerspelling for uniform rhythm within and between words x. Fingerspelling for importance and emphasis xi. Fingerspelling acronyms and proper nouns xii. Fingerspelled loan signs b. Consecutive signing, simultaneous signing and interpreting i. Sign choice to convey meaning of utterance with accurate vocabulary choice ii.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Language Variation and Change 12 London | 3-5 September 2019
    UK Language Variation and Change 12 London | 3-5 September 2019 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS PLENARIES 8 Modelling sociolinguistic cognition with existing systems 8 Kathryn Campbell-Kibler Ohio State University Calibrate to innovate: variation and change between childhood and adolescence 9 Sophie Holmes-Elliott University of Southampton Urban contact dialects: A comparative view 10 Heike Wiese Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin TALKS 11 A [ʃ]triking change in Manchester English 11 George Bailey1, Stephen Nichols2, Maciej Baranowski2 & Danielle Turton3 1University of York, 2University of Manchester & 3Lancaster University The role of identity and mobility in reconciling individual and community change: Insight from a combined panel and trend study 13 Karen Beaman Queen Mary University of London Phonetic stability across time: Linguistic enclaves in Switzerland 16 Andrin Büchler & Adrian Leeman University of Bern Intersections between race, place, and gender in the production of /s/ 18 Jeremy Calder1 & Sharese King2 1University of Colorado Boulder, 2University of Chicago 'BE LIKE' quotatives in other languages: pragmatic borrowings or independent developments? 19 Jenny Cheshire1 & Maria Secova2 1Queen Mary University of London, 2The Open University The Effect of Priming on Accent Attitudes: An Investigation of their Affective and Cognitive Bases 21 Mary Chioti University of Manchester - 1 - The Evolution of a Vernacular: Insights into the Motivations for Linguistic Change through Longitudinal Case Study Research 23 Patricia Cukor-Avila University of North
    [Show full text]