<<

Our Gut Flora: The Internist’s Guide

Walter J. Coyle, MD, FACP,FACG Scripps Clinic Grand Rounds 2012 Disclosures

 Speaker’s Bureau: Takeda Pharmaceuticals  Consultant: CSA Medical

 Specifically, I have no financial relationships with any probiotic or prebiotic company Movement of the Talk

 Describe the 101  Review the diversity of human gut flora  Understand how our influence our metabolism, obesity, and selected diseases  Review the plethora of probiotics  Describe prebiotics and synbiotics and their potential uses  Conclusions and the Future The

 Definitions:  Microbiome: Aggregate of all gut species  : Individual bacterial species in the biome  Over 100 trillion organisms (1014)  Passengers in the mobile colonic petri dish  Over 500 species identified so far (70 divisions)  90% of the cells in our body our microbial!  100 fold more genes in our gut then in us  Our flora are an integral part of our genetic landscape and evolution Anatomic Regions of the Gut

 Upper GI tract: 102 –104 cells/ml  Lactobacilli, streptococci, H pylori  Ileum: 106-1012 cells /ml, upper bacteria plus  FaculativeFusobacterium anaerobes: Enterobacteriaceae  Obligate anaerobes: Bacteroides, Veillonella, and Clostridium species  Colon: distal human colon is the most biodense natural ecosystem known (1010-1012 cells/ml)  Complex and diverse  Comprise most of our bacterial biomass Microbes and Humans

Dethlefsen Nature 2007; 449:812-818 Micro 101

Pace in Science 1997 276:735-740 The Human Gut Flora

DiBiase, et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:460-469 Mouse intestine, mucus gel layer Home to billions of organisms

Sonnenburg J, et al. in Nature Immunology 2004:5

The Microbiome: Who’s there?

 Early gut colonization has four phases  Phase 1: Sterile gut  Phase 2: Initial acquisition: vagina, feces, hospital  Phase 3: Breast feeding or bottle-feeding (different)  Breast fed more bifidobacteria (up to 90% of flora)  Bottle fed more diverse; more Bacteroides , and Clostridial species  Phase 4: Start of solids; move to adult flora  Bifidobacteria remain key flora into adulthood

Ley, Peterson, Gordon. Cell 2006 ;124:837 Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070 Edwards, et al. Br J Nutr. 2002 The Microbiome: Who’s there?

 Adult Microbiome:  Increasing diversity of flora as we age  In some newer PCR (16S rRNA) studies, up to 92% of the flora in adults were “novel” species  Serial stool collections show remarkable stability by an individual  Greatest concordance with twins  Less concordance with households  Host genetic influence unexplored.

McCartney and Gibson in Gastrointestinal Microbiology, 51-73, 2006 16s ribosomal RNA

 Important tool for bacterial identification  1500 bp  Unique to bacteria and conserved through time  Over 8000 species can be identified by 16s rRNA The Microbiome: Who’s there?

 Multiple species: eukaryotic, bacterial, archael  Firmicutes (Gram +/ motile) and Bacteroidetes (Gram -) : Majority  These two groups comprise > 90%  Anaerobes / aerobes: 1000:1  Far fewer species than the environment  High levels of interpersonal diversity  My stool is not your stool

Ley, Peterson, Gordon. Cell 2006 ;124:837 Ley, et al. Science 2005; 307: 1915 Ley R, et al in Cell 2006:124:837-848 Gut Flora and Metabolism Metabolomics

 Study of the metabolites and small molecules that the body and gut bacteria produce.  New area of science  Broader than proteonomics  Includes bacteria products with our own genetic products  Pioneered by Jeremy Nicholson and Jeff Gordon Gut Flora and Metabolism

 Microbial genomes enhance our metabolic activity  May indirectly or directly effect our metabolism  The colon is very active metabolically  20-70 gms of carbos and 5-20 gms of protein/day  Over 100 kcal per day!  Mass of colonic microbiome = single kidney  Metabolically as active as the liver

Hooper, et al. Annu Rev Nutr, 2002 Gut Flora and Metabolism

 Energy salvage: esp via the short-chain fatty acids  Acetate, butyrate, propionate (SCFAs)  Absorbed into body and used by liver and others organs  Acetate and propionate modulate glucose metabolism in the liver and adipocytes (glycemic index)  50-70% of colonic cell energy derived from butyrate  Number and diversity of organisms key  Do we acquire flora that program us for obesity or normal weight?

Mackowiak, NEJM, 1982; 307:83-93 Hooper, et al. Annu Rev Nutr, 2002 Gut Flora Metabolic Reactions

Metabolic reactions

Goldin BR in Gastrointestinal Microbiology 138-154, 2006 Gut Flora in Health and Disease

 Koch’s postulates: old view of microbes  New view: microecologic disease or “pathogenic microbial community”  Disease not due to one organism but changes in mix  Dysbiosis: Abnormal state of the microbial ecosystem in the host  Harmful and protective species or families Gut Enterotypes: New Concept

 Recent evidence suggests 3 distinct gut types exist  May be independent of geography  May be programmed early  Can we change the gut type  No clear link in this study to BMI or metabolic syndrome

Nature 2011; 473:174-180 The Human Microbiome

 Immunologically active environment  Protection: 2 levels  Colonization resistance:  Competition, pH, gases, bacteriocins, etc…  Stimulate immune function:  Indigenous bacteria stimulate mucosal defense and immune development  GALT: Gut-associated lymphoid tissue J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:1087-94

J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128:646-52.) Gut Flora and Immunity

 Neonates by vaginal delivery have more diverse microbiota more bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and Bacteroides vs C-section neonates  Atopic children have less bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and Bacteroides  Loss of diversity in children associated with more atopy, eczema, and obesity  Studies with probiotics have not been able to reliably influence atopy, eczema, or asthma

J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:1087-94 J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128:646-52 Gut Flora and Immunity

 Gut flora differ from industrialized society and 3rd world nations  Possible connection  Data supports vitamin D being important in the immune reaction to gut flora  Possible role in allergy and obesity  Convincing data that manipulation of the gut flora can help is limited.

J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:1087-94 Obesity and the Gut Flora Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070-75 The Microbiome: Changes in flora

 Mice and humans have different gut flora but the two largest divisions are shared in common  Bacteroidetes (Gram -)  Firmicutes (Gram +)  These flora change in response to diet and obesity of host

Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070-75 Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070-75 The Microbiome: Changes in flora

 Obesity changes the relative proportions of divisions.  Obese mice AND obese people have more Firmicutes than Bacteroidetes: dieting and weight gain shifts these proportions.  What are the implications of the change in our colonic metabolic machine  Chicken or the egg?

Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070-75 Gut Flora and Obesity

 Germ free mice studied by Gordon, et al  Control mice (remaining germ free) were changed from low fat diet to “Western” diet  Mice given normal gut flora (conventialized mice) also had same diet change.  Low fat diet: 5% lipids  “Western” diet: 41% lipids, 41% carbos (with simple sugars), 18% protein

Gordon J, et al, PNAS 2007;104:983 Gut Flora and Obesity

 Mice then studied for change in weight and fat pad size  Assessed response to fatty meal loading  Assessed locomotion of mice via gastrocnemius muscle activity.  Results: See Figures

Gordon J, et al, PNAS 2007;104:983 Gut Flora and Obesity

Gordon J, et al, PNAS 2007;104:983 Gut Flora and Obesity

 GF mice are “resistant” to the Western diet  Gut flora are responsible for increasing energy production from food  “Doctor, I don’t eat” May be partially true!  Gut flora also influence lipid production, adipose cell storage, and appear to influence mouse locomotor activity  “Couch potato” gut flora  My gut flora made me do it!

Gordon J, et al, PNAS 2007;104:983 “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food.”

Hippocrates The Microbiome: transplant experiments

Wild type mouse Ob Ob mouse

Turnbaugh, et al. Nature 2006; 444:1027 The Microbiome: transplant experiments

 Germ-free mice given ob/ob or wild-type flora  Chow consumption and exercise the same for both groups  Both sets had similar starting weight and % BF.  The ob/ob microbiota promote host adiposity

Turnbaugh, et al. Nature 2006; 444:1027 Human Flora and Obesity

 Mice data links gut flora with obesity and diet  Studied 12 obese human subjects; low calorie diet for one year  Fat-restricted (FAT-R)  Carbohydrate restricted (CARB-R)  Microbiota studied for one year (16s rRNA)  Firmicutes and bacteroidetes dominated (92.6%)

Ley R, et al in Nature 2006:444 Human Flora and Obesity

Ley R, et al in Nature 2006:444 Human Flora and Obesity

 Firmicutes dominate in obese subjects  All subjects (no diff with diet) had bloom of all Bacteroidetes with decline in Firmicutes  CARB-R: Change began at 2% wgt loss  FAT-R: Change began at 6% wgt loss  Dynamic link between obesity and gut flora exists in humans (proven 1st in mice)

Ley R, et al in Nature 2006:444  Murine model  Given various antibiotics early in life  Found changes in fat composition  Metabolic changes also occurred  The mix of flora changed  Firmacutes >> Bacteroidetes

Blaser, et al. Nature 2012 Antibiotic exposure in mice

Blaser, et al. Nature 2012  Studied 11,532 children in Avon, UK (91-93)  Mapped antibiotic use (<6m,6-14m,15-23m)  Body mass documented at 6wks, 10m, 20m, 38m and 7 yrs  Multivariate analysis: role of tob, mother’s BMI, other medications, etc…

International J of Obesity; 2012: 1-8 Antibiotics in children and obesity

Blaser, et al. Nature 2012 Proposed Mechanisms in Obesity

DiBiase, et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:460-469 Microbiome: regulators

 Archae: 1-2 % of mouse and human flora  Represent a major microbial group in gut flora  Increased in obese mice  Many are methanogenic : Methanobacter smithii  Converts CO2 and H2 gas to methane  By decreasing the partial pressure of H2 gas these bacteria can drive bacterial metabolism  The flora of obese mice are more efficient at extracting energy: “The Energy Harvest” The Gut and Obesity: Options

 Diet may manipulate flora  Low carbs, high fat  High carbs, low fat  Probiotics  Prebiotics  Stool transplants  “Guarantee weight loss with thin people’s feces!”  Could this be the future?  Fecal Transplant Workgroup  Good review and provides “cookbook” recipe for performing fecal transplant

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2011;9:1044–1049 Stool Transplants: How To

 Stool transplants: “prepared” feces by NGT or enema or colonoscopy  Usually family member; 30-50 g fresh stool  Stool homogenized for delivery  No infectious complications to date  Screen for Hepatitis, HIV, etc…  73-100% response reported in C Diff

Gastro 2006;130 Clin Infect Dis 2003;36 Stool Transplant: Evidence

 2003 case series of refractory C diff patients  Stool via NG from healthy family member  15 of 18 became recurrence-free  2009 case series of refractory C diff patients  11 of 15 became recurrence-free  2010 case series of refractory C diff patients  Stool via colonoscopy  12 of 12 with immediate and sustained response Clin Infect Dis 2003;36: 540-544 QJM 2009;102:781-784 Yoon, J of Clin Gastro 2010, 44:562-66 Colonoscopy Stool Transplants Coyle’s Corollary

It is better to be a stool donor than a recipient. Stool donor cards will be made available after this lecture. Stool Donor Card

Share your stool; stop obesity CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2010;8:471–473 Coming to your neighborhood soon….

Stool transplants done here.

Donations accepted. Probiotics Probiotics

 Definition: Live which when ingested in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host.  Majority of probiotics are Gram +, lactic acid producers (ie. Firmacutes) boulardiiBifidobacterial species and Lactobacillus species  Survive transit through stomach and duodenum  Others include: non-pathogenic streptococci, enterococci, E coli Nissle 1917, Saccharomyces (yeast)

Fooks, et al. Int Dairy J, 1999 Sheil, et al. In Gastrointestinal Microbiology, 2006 Common Probiotics

Khedkar and Ouwehand in Gastrointest Microbiology 315-334, 2006 Probiotics

 VSL #3  4 lactobacilli  L. plantarum, casei, acidopholus, delbrueckii spp  3 bidifobacteria  B. infantis, breve, longum  1 streptococcus  Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus Small, Rand, PC studies have shown efficacy in pouchitis and IBS Newer studies shown some efficacy in mild/mod UC Probiotics

 Digestive Advantage  Ganeden BC30  Bacillus coagulans  Erythritol  Cellulose  Other minor ingredients  Some data for IBS  Mostly bloating

Postgrad Med, Vol. 121, Issue 2, March 2009 Probiotics

 12 different species

 Mostly Lactobacillus and Bidifobacter species

 Clinical data with these combinations lacking Probiotics

 Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 aka Bifantis  “Patented” strain of probiotic in Align  Decreased symptoms in two moderate sized trials in subjects with IBS*  Bloating decreased  Less loose stools

*Whorwell P, et al. Am J Gastro 2006; 101 O’Mahoney L, et al. Gastro 2005;128 Probiotics: E. coli Nissle 1917

 Discovered in 1917 by Professor Alfred Nissle  Well studied  Some data for use in IBD, IBS, and Ab associated diarrhea  Excellent safety profile Probiotics

 Saccharomyces boulardii  Other minor ingredients  Shown in Rand / PC trials to help prevent recurrent C. difficile infection  Decreases antibiotic associated diarrhea

Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;101(4):812-22 McFarland, et al. JAMA 1994;271:1913-8 Probiotics in Food (Actimel)

 L. casei Immunitas™  Claim it is scientifically proven to be effective  “Each bottle contains 10 billion live” bacteria “that survive and remain active in the digestive tract.” Probiotics in Food (Activia)

 Contains Bifidus regularis  Bifidobacterium animus  Scientific trials show increased transit time in adults and women  “Helps with slow transit in women and the elderly”

Bioscience and Microflora, 2001;20:43-48, Aliment Pharm Ther 2002;16:587-93 Probiotics for Immune System???

 Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103)  Patented by Gorbach and Goldin  Various studies have shown it to be better than placebo for diarrheal illnesses  Proven to survive the stomach, produces lactic acid and binds to human colonocytes

BMJ 2007; 335 : 340-345 IBD and the Gut: A target for Probiotics Hypothesis for flora and IBD

Gastro 2011;140:1720–1728 Probiotics and prebiotics in maintenance of remission in Crohn’s disease

Study Groups Relapse Rate (%) n Intervention Comparator Dur Intervention Comparator p

Guslandi 32 S. Bouliardii Mesalamine 6 6 38 0.04 (2000) + Mesalamine Campieri 40 VSL #3 Mesalamine 12 20 40 NR (2000) Prantera 45 LGG Placebo 12 17 11 0.3 (2002) Schultz 11 LGG Placebo 6 60 67 NS (2004) Bousvaro 75 LGG Placebo 24 31 17 0.18 s (2005) Marleau 98 L. johnsonii Placebo 6 49 64 0.15 (2006) Van 70 L. johnsonii Placebo 3 15 14 0.91 Gossum (2007) Chermes 30 Synbiotic Placebo 24 25 20 NS h(2007) 2000 Probiotics and IBD

 Studies in France have shown that Crohn’s pts may be lacking in bacteria from Clostridium leptum group  Their studies also support F. prausnitzii as key  In mice and men have shown that F. prausnitzii decreases recurrence of Crohn’s and decreases gut inflammation.  ? Use as probiotic Sokol, et al. Proceedings of the National Acad Science, Oct 2008 group (firmacutes) is a major member of the

Clostridium leptum

1. Prausnitzii F. (mucosa-associated 2. MAM bacteria microbiota): probably more important than luminal bacteria Probiotics and Ulcerative Colitis

 Prosp, Rand/PC trial of 144 pts with mild to mod UC: VSL #3 (3,600 Billion) vs PBO  Standard Rx same, 8 wk duration  Outcome: 50% decline in UCDAI, remission  Results: 50% decline 63% vs 41% (P=.01 PP)  Remission: 47% vs 32% (P=.069 PP)  Safety: no major AEs, bloating most common  CAUTION: Large dose, PP ok, ITT less so Tursi A, et al. AJG 2010; 218:1-10 and altered microbiota

Clostridium difficile Recurrence: Probiotic Treatment

 Probiotics  Saccharomyces boulardii: 500 mg bid for 4-6 wks  Modest evidence  One DB / PC trials show fair efficacy  Lactobacilli: 1 g qid for 4-6 weeks  Evidence not as convincing  PO nontoxicogenic C Diff: experimental  Effective but only case reports to date Gastro 2006;130 Ann Intern Med 2006; 145 Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:812–822. Probiotics and C. Difficile

 124 Adults with C difficile (Rand, PC)  64 1st episode, 60 recurrent CDAD  Standard Ab with S. boulardii or PBO  Outcome: Recurrence of CDAD  1st Episode: 19.3% vs 24.2% (P=.86)  Rec CDAD: 34.6% vs 64.7% (P=.04)  S. boulardii reduced risk for recurrence in subjects with recurrent C difficile (small numbers)

McFarland, et al. JAMA 1994;271:1913-8 Probiotics and Diarrhea

 135 hospitalized pts given antibiotics  DB, PC, Rand trial  Probiotic Yogurt (Actimel) or PC BID  Diarrhea: 34% PC vs 12% active (NNT:5)  C Diff: Less often in Rx arm (NNT: 6)  First rand trial to show prevention of C diff with probiotics

Hickson M, et al. BMJ, 2007:335-80  16 studies, 3432 children (ages 2wks-17yrs)  Great heterogeneity, short studies, low quality  Overall protective effect seen (NNT:7)  High dose (>5 billion CFU)  L rhamnosus and S boulardii had best data

 Better studies needed Cochrane Review Irritable Bowel Syndrome(IBS), the Microbiome, and Probiotics The Microbiome and IBS

 Hydrogen gas production is a by-product of bacterial fermentation  Elimination is dependent on methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria (making either methane or hydrogen sulfide).  Competitive species: usually 1 predominates in your gut flora

Strocchi, et al. Gut 1994; 35:1098 Gut flora and IBS: an hypothesis

Talley and Fodor in Gastro 2011.09.019 Editorials The Microbiome and IBS

 Methane gas produced in higher quantities in constipation predominant IBS.  Methane shown to decrease contractility of smooth muscle.  Suggests that your IBS type is based largely on your type of gut flora  Predominance of Methane producers = IBS-C  Predominance of Sulfide producers = IBS-D

Pimental, et al. DDS 2003; 48: 86-92 Probiotics in IBS

 103 IBS pts (Rome 2)  6 month, DB, PC, Rand trial  Probiotic Capsule: 5 bacteria (Lacto, Bifido, Priopionibacter, etc)  42% reduction of Total Symptom score in treatment vs 6 % for placebo  Largest decline was in Borborygmi

Alimen Pharm and Therapeutics, 2005:22(5):387 Probiotics in IBS

 Similar study in 59 children using VSL #3  Placebo controlled, crossover  IBS like scale as primary outcome  Safe and effective for relief of Sx Guandalini S. et al. Abstract 73rd ACG 2008 Probiotics in IBS

 Large , systemic review of best trials for IBS  Only 16 trials met the rigorous criteria  11 still had one or more major flaws  Only two trials showed significant improvement in a primary endpoint vs placebo  Both used Bifidobacterium infantis 35624  Better trials required, need to use Rome criteria

Brenner D, Am J Gastro 2009;104:1033-1049 Probiotics in IBS

 Recent Meta-analysis on probiotics and IBS  18 RCTs found (N=1650)  11 trials high quality, 4 very high  Different organisms and outcomes  Most improvement was in bloating  No sign. Adverse events reported  “Probiotics are effective in IBS”  Caution: Best 4 studies> No difference; Rome criteria not used, all studies have small #s

Moayyedi P, Talley N, et al. Gut, 2010;59:325-32 Prebiotics Prebiotics

 Ingested substances that selectively stimulate the proliferation and/or activity of desirable bacterial populations present in the host intestinal tract.  Usually target bifidobacteria and lactobacilli  Bifidogenic or bifidus factors explored in the 50s  Usually are non-digestible oligosaccharides (NDOs)  Lactulose, galacto-oligosaccharides, lactosucrose…

Crittenden and Playne. In Gastrointestinal Microbiology, 2006, pg 285-314. Prebiotics

 Inulin: polymers mainly comprising fructose units, have a terminal glucose  Indigestable fiber  Gut flora produce H2, CO2, methane gas from inulin Prebiotics

 Inulin: plant polymers mainly comprising fructose units, use have a terminal glucose  Indigestable fiber  Gut flora produce H2, CO2, methane gas from inulin  “Breakfast of Flatulance” Prebiotics

Feed your flora!!! Prebiotics

 Is is possible to design a food, sugar, protein, or fat that would alter your gut flora to promote weight loss?  More likely possibility is to give a prebiotic that decreases your “Energy Harvest” of colonic bacteria  ie. lose weight by making your gut flora less efficient at digesting your left over food Synbiotics

 Combination of a probiotic and prebiotic  Little data supports efficacy  Prebiotic has been inulin, fatty acid, other carrier molecules  More to come… Designing Probiotics: The Future?

GASTROENTEROLOGY 2009;136:2015–2031 Conclusions

 The human microbiome and the Microbiome Project: research just beginning…  Gut flora by their genes, by-products, and metabolic activity influence our metabolism, weight, activity, immunity, health and disease.  Manipulation of gut flora may be an integral part of weight loss programs and different disease treatments in the future. Conclusions

 Future studies must focus on the mechanisms of influence of our gut flora.  Studies must be placebo controlled and high quality.  Truly need translational science to work at the levels of the petri dish, genomics, and clinical outcomes.  Much more to come! The Future

 Define who is there: in healthy subjects and those with disease  Study at Scripps in subjects with diet change, NASH, and IBD  Elucidate the gut flora host interaction  Design trials that truly assess the potential for probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics to make a difference in health and disease. Questions Name this famous scientist Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

 Father of microbiology  Born in Delft, Netherlands on October 24, 1632  Studied the bacteria in his own stools  Invented the first microscope