Our Gut Flora: the Internist's Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Our Gut Flora: the Internist's Guide Our Gut Flora: The Internist’s Guide Walter J. Coyle, MD, FACP,FACG Scripps Clinic Grand Rounds 2012 Disclosures Speaker’s Bureau: Takeda Pharmaceuticals Consultant: CSA Medical Specifically, I have no financial relationships with any probiotic or prebiotic company Movement of the Talk Describe the Microbiome Microbiology 101 Review the diversity of human gut flora Understand how our bacteria influence our metabolism, obesity, and selected diseases Review the plethora of probiotics Describe prebiotics and synbiotics and their potential uses Conclusions and the Future The Human Microbiome Definitions: Microbiome: Aggregate of all gut species Microbiota: Individual bacterial species in the biome Over 100 trillion organisms (1014) Passengers in the mobile colonic petri dish Over 500 species identified so far (70 divisions) 90% of the cells in our body our microbial! 100 fold more genes in our gut then in us Our flora are an integral part of our genetic landscape and evolution Anatomic Regions of the Gut Upper GI tract: 102 –104 cells/ml Lactobacilli, streptococci, H pylori Ileum: 106-1012 cells /ml, upper bacteria plus Faculative anaerobes: Enterobacteriaceae Obligate anaerobes: Bacteroides, Veillonella, Fusobacterium and Clostridium species Colon: distal human colon is the most biodense natural ecosystem known (1010-1012 cells/ml) Complex and diverse Comprise most of our bacterial biomass Microbes and Humans Dethlefsen Nature 2007; 449:812-818 Micro 101 Pace in Science 1997 276:735-740 The Human Gut Flora DiBiase, et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:460-469 Mouse intestine, mucus gel layer Home to billions of organisms Sonnenburg J, et al. in Nature Immunology 2004:5 The Microbiome: Who’s there? Early gut colonization has four phases Phase 1: Sterile gut Phase 2: Initial acquisition: vagina, feces, hospital Phase 3: Breast feeding or bottle-feeding (different) Breast fed more bifidobacteria (up to 90% of flora) Bottle fed more diverse; more Bacteroides , and Clostridial species Phase 4: Start of solids; move to adult flora Bifidobacteria remain key flora into adulthood Ley, Peterson, Gordon. Cell 2006 ;124:837 Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070 Edwards, et al. Br J Nutr. 2002 The Microbiome: Who’s there? Adult Microbiome: Increasing diversity of flora as we age In some newer PCR (16S rRNA) studies, up to 92% of the flora in adults were “novel” species Serial stool collections show remarkable stability by an individual Greatest concordance with twins Less concordance with households Host genetic influence unexplored. McCartney and Gibson in Gastrointestinal Microbiology, 51-73, 2006 16s ribosomal RNA Important tool for bacterial identification 1500 bp Unique to bacteria and conserved through time Over 8000 species can be identified by 16s rRNA The Microbiome: Who’s there? Multiple species: eukaryotic, bacterial, archael Firmicutes (Gram +/ motile) and Bacteroidetes (Gram -) : Majority These two groups comprise > 90% Anaerobes / aerobes: 1000:1 Far fewer species than the environment High levels of interpersonal diversity My stool is not your stool Ley, Peterson, Gordon. Cell 2006 ;124:837 Ley, et al. Science 2005; 307: 1915 Ley R, et al in Cell 2006:124:837-848 Gut Flora and Metabolism Metabolomics Study of the metabolites and small molecules that the body and gut bacteria produce. New area of science Broader than proteonomics Includes bacteria products with our own genetic products Pioneered by Jeremy Nicholson and Jeff Gordon Gut Flora and Metabolism Microbial genomes enhance our metabolic activity May indirectly or directly effect our metabolism The colon is very active metabolically 20-70 gms of carbos and 5-20 gms of protein/day Over 100 kcal per day! Mass of colonic microbiome = single kidney Metabolically as active as the liver Hooper, et al. Annu Rev Nutr, 2002 Gut Flora and Metabolism Energy salvage: esp via the short-chain fatty acids Acetate, butyrate, propionate (SCFAs) Absorbed into body and used by liver and others organs Acetate and propionate modulate glucose metabolism in the liver and adipocytes (glycemic index) 50-70% of colonic cell energy derived from butyrate Number and diversity of organisms key Do we acquire flora that program us for obesity or normal weight? Mackowiak, NEJM, 1982; 307:83-93 Hooper, et al. Annu Rev Nutr, 2002 Gut Flora Metabolic Reactions Metabolic reactions Goldin BR in Gastrointestinal Microbiology 138-154, 2006 Gut Flora in Health and Disease Koch’s postulates: old view of microbes New view: microecologic disease or “pathogenic microbial community” Disease not due to one organism but changes in mix Dysbiosis: Abnormal state of the microbial ecosystem in the host Harmful and protective species or families Gut Enterotypes: New Concept Recent evidence suggests 3 distinct gut types exist May be independent of geography May be programmed early Can we change the gut type No clear link in this study to BMI or metabolic syndrome Nature 2011; 473:174-180 The Human Microbiome Immunologically active environment Protection: 2 levels Colonization resistance: Competition, pH, gases, bacteriocins, etc… Stimulate immune function: Indigenous bacteria stimulate mucosal defense and immune development GALT: Gut-associated lymphoid tissue J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:1087-94 J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128:646-52.) Gut Flora and Immunity Neonates by vaginal delivery have more diverse microbiota more bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and Bacteroides vs C-section neonates Atopic children have less bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and Bacteroides Loss of diversity in children associated with more atopy, eczema, and obesity Studies with probiotics have not been able to reliably influence atopy, eczema, or asthma J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:1087-94 J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128:646-52 Gut Flora and Immunity Gut flora differ from industrialized society and 3rd world nations Possible connection Data supports vitamin D being important in the immune reaction to gut flora Possible role in allergy and obesity Convincing data that manipulation of the gut flora can help is limited. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:1087-94 Obesity and the Gut Flora Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070-75 The Microbiome: Changes in flora Mice and humans have different gut flora but the two largest divisions are shared in common Bacteroidetes (Gram -) Firmicutes (Gram +) These flora change in response to diet and obesity of host Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070-75 Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070-75 The Microbiome: Changes in flora Obesity changes the relative proportions of divisions. Obese mice AND obese people have more Firmicutes than Bacteroidetes: dieting and weight gain shifts these proportions. What are the implications of the change in our colonic metabolic machine Chicken or the egg? Ley, et al. PNAS. 2005, 102: 11070-75 Gut Flora and Obesity Germ free mice studied by Gordon, et al Control mice (remaining germ free) were changed from low fat diet to “Western” diet Mice given normal gut flora (conventialized mice) also had same diet change. Low fat diet: 5% lipids “Western” diet: 41% lipids, 41% carbos (with simple sugars), 18% protein Gordon J, et al, PNAS 2007;104:983 Gut Flora and Obesity Mice then studied for change in weight and fat pad size Assessed response to fatty meal loading Assessed locomotion of mice via gastrocnemius muscle activity. Results: See Figures Gordon J, et al, PNAS 2007;104:983 Gut Flora and Obesity Gordon J, et al, PNAS 2007;104:983 Gut Flora and Obesity GF mice are “resistant” to the Western diet Gut flora are responsible for increasing energy production from food “Doctor, I don’t eat” May be partially true! Gut flora also influence lipid production, adipose cell storage, and appear to influence mouse locomotor activity “Couch potato” gut flora My gut flora made me do it! Gordon J, et al, PNAS 2007;104:983 “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food.” Hippocrates The Microbiome: transplant experiments Wild type mouse Ob Ob mouse Turnbaugh, et al. Nature 2006; 444:1027 The Microbiome: transplant experiments Germ-free mice given ob/ob or wild-type flora Chow consumption and exercise the same for both groups Both sets had similar starting weight and % BF. The ob/ob microbiota promote host adiposity Turnbaugh, et al. Nature 2006; 444:1027 Human Flora and Obesity Mice data links gut flora with obesity and diet Studied 12 obese human subjects; low calorie diet for one year Fat-restricted (FAT-R) Carbohydrate restricted (CARB-R) Microbiota studied for one year (16s rRNA) Firmicutes and bacteroidetes dominated (92.6%) Ley R, et al in Nature 2006:444 Human Flora and Obesity Ley R, et al in Nature 2006:444 Human Flora and Obesity Firmicutes dominate in obese subjects All subjects (no diff with diet) had bloom of all Bacteroidetes with decline in Firmicutes CARB-R: Change began at 2% wgt loss FAT-R: Change began at 6% wgt loss Dynamic link between obesity and gut flora exists in humans (proven 1st in mice) Ley R, et al in Nature 2006:444 Murine model Given various antibiotics early in life Found changes in fat composition Metabolic changes also occurred The mix of flora changed Firmacutes >> Bacteroidetes Blaser, et al. Nature 2012 Antibiotic exposure in mice Blaser, et al. Nature 2012 Studied 11,532 children in Avon, UK (91-93) Mapped antibiotic use (<6m,6-14m,15-23m) Body mass documented at 6wks, 10m, 20m, 38m and 7 yrs Multivariate analysis: role of tob, mother’s
Recommended publications
  • Root Microbiota Assembly and Adaptive Differentiation Among European
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/640623; this version posted May 17, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Root microbiota assembly and adaptive differentiation among European 2 Arabidopsis populations 3 4 Thorsten Thiergart1,7, Paloma Durán1,7, Thomas Ellis2, Ruben Garrido-Oter1,3, Eric Kemen4, Fabrice 5 Roux5, Carlos Alonso-Blanco6, Jon Ågren2,*, Paul Schulze-Lefert1,3,*, Stéphane Hacquard1,*. 6 7 1Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany 8 2Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE‐752 36 9 Uppsala, Sweden 10 3Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 11 50829 Cologne, Germany 12 4Department of Microbial Interactions, IMIT/ZMBP, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, 13 Germany 14 5LIPM, INRA, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France 15 6Departamento de Genética Molecular de Plantas, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo 16 Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain 17 7These authors contributed equally: Thorsten Thiergart, Paloma Durán 18 *e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 19 20 Summary 21 Factors that drive continental-scale variation in root microbiota and plant adaptation are poorly 22 understood. We monitored root-associated microbial communities in Arabidopsis thaliana and co- 23 occurring grasses at 17 European sites across three years.
    [Show full text]
  • How Your Body Decides If Bacteria Are Friends Or Foes § Would You
    §How your body decides if bacteria are friends or foes § Would you: • Let you child eat food that dropped on the ground? • Let your child suck their thumbs? • Take antibiotics without knowing the true reason you are feeling sick? Humans and Microbes • Leeuwenhoek’s discovery of microorganisms in 17th century led people to suspect they might cause diseases • Robert Koch (1876) offered proof of what is now considered germ theory of disease; showed Bacillus anthracis causes anthrax • Today, we now know that most of the bacteria we associate with are not pathogens, and many are critical for our health. Bacteria Are Ubiquitous § We contact numerous microorganisms daily • Every surface on earth is covered! • Even clouds have microbes – Could play a role in seeding rain.. • Some have tremendous commercial value • Yogurts, wine, cheese, vinegar, pickles, etc. • Our bodies: • Breathe in, ingest, pick up on skin • Vast majority do not make us sick, or cause infections • Some colonize body surfaces; or slough off with dead epithelial cells • Most that are swallowed die in stomach or are eliminated in feces • Relatively few are pathogens that cause damage Microbes, Health, and Disease § Most microbes are harmless • Many are beneficial • Normal microbiota (normal flora) are organisms that routinely reside on body’s surfaces • Relationship is a balance, and some can cause disease under certain conditions-- opportunistic infections • Weaknesses in innate or adaptive defenses can leave individuals vulnerable to invasion – malnutrition, cancer, AIDS or
    [Show full text]
  • The Neuroprotective Effect of Tea Polyphenols on the Regulation of Intestinal Flora
    molecules Review The Neuroprotective Effect of Tea Polyphenols on the Regulation of Intestinal Flora Zhicheng Zhang 1,2,3, Yuting Zhang 4, Junmin Li 2,3,*, Chengxin Fu 1,* and Xin Zhang 4,* 1 Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology for Endangered Wildlife of the Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email protected] 2 Taizhou Biomedical Industry Research Institute Co., Ltd., Taizhou 317000, China 3 College of Life Sciences, Taizhou University, Taizhou 317000, China 4 Department of Food Science and Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (C.F.); [email protected] (X.Z.) Abstract: Tea polyphenols (TPs) are the general compounds of natural polyhydroxyphenols extracted in tea. Although a large number of studies have shown that TPs have obvious neuroprotective and neuro repair effects, they are limited due to the low bioavailability in vivo. However, TPs can act indirectly on the central nervous system by affecting the “microflora–gut–brain axis”, in which the microbiota and its composition represent a factor that determines brain health. Bidirectional communication between the intestinal microflora and the brain (microbe–gut–brain axis) occurs through a variety of pathways, including the vagus nerve, immune system, neuroendocrine pathways, and bacteria-derived metabolites. This axis has been shown to influence neurotransmission and behavior, which is usually associated with neuropsychiatric disorders. In this review, we discuss that TPs and their metabolites may provide benefits by restoring the imbalance of intestinal microbiota and Citation: Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; that TPs are metabolized by intestinal flora, to provide a new idea for TPs to play a neuroprotective Fu, C.; Zhang, X.
    [Show full text]
  • Presence of Archaea in the Indoor Environment and Their Relationships with Housing Characteristics
    Microb Ecol (2016) 72:305–312 DOI 10.1007/s00248-016-0767-z ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Presence of Archaea in the Indoor Environment and Their Relationships with Housing Characteristics Sepideh Pakpour1,2 & James A. Scott3 & Stuart E. Turvey 4,5 & Jeffrey R. Brook3 & Timothy K. Takaro6 & Malcolm R. Sears7 & John Klironomos1 Received: 3 April 2016 /Accepted: 5 April 2016 /Published online: 20 April 2016 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract Archaea are widespread and abundant in soils, Based on the results, Archaea are not equally distributed with- oceans, or human and animal gastrointestinal (GI) tracts. in houses, and the areas with greater input of outdoor However, very little is known about the presence of Archaea microbiome and higher traffic and material heterogeneity tend in indoor environments and factors that can regulate their to have a higher abundance of Archaea. Nevertheless, more re- abundances. Using a quantitative PCR approach, and search is needed to better understand causes and consequences of targeting the archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes in floor this microbial group in indoor environments. dust samples, we found that Archaea are a common part of the indoor microbiota, 5.01 ± 0.14 (log 16S rRNA gene copies/g Keywords Archaea . Bacteria . Indoor environment . qPCR . dust, mean ± SE) in bedrooms and 5.58 ± 0.13 in common Building characteristics . Human activities rooms, such as living rooms. Their abundance, however, was lower than bacteria: 9.20 ± 0.32 and 9.17 ± 0.32 in bed- rooms and common rooms, respectively. In addition, by mea- Introduction suring a broad array of environmental factors, we obtained preliminary insights into how the abundance of total archaeal The biology and ecology of the third domain of life, Archaea, 16S rRNA gene copies in indoor environment would be asso- have been studied far less when compared to the other do- ciated with building characteristics and occupants’ activities.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Microbial Communities in the Phyllosphere Johan H.J
    Biology of the Plant Cuticle Edited by Markus Riederer, Caroline Müller Copyright © 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Biology of the Plant Cuticle Edited by Markus Riederer, Caroline Müller Copyright © 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd 11 Microbial communities in the phyllosphere Johan H.J. Leveau 11.1 Introduction The term phyllosphere was coined by Last (1955) and Ruinen (1956) to describe the plant leaf surface as an environment that is physically, chemically and biologically distinct from the plant leaf itself or the air surrounding it. The term phylloplane has been used also, either instead of or in addition to the term phyllosphere. Its two- dimensional connotation, however, does not do justice to the three dimensions that characterise the phyllosphere from the perspective of many of its microscopic inhab- itants. On a global scale, the phyllosphere is arguably one of the largest biological surfaces colonised by microorganisms. Satellite images have allowed a conservative approximation of 4 × 108 km2 for the earth’s terrestrial surface area covered with foliage (Morris and Kinkel, 2002). It has been estimated that this leaf surface area is home to an astonishing 1026 bacteria (Morris and Kinkel, 2002), which are the most abundant colonisers of cuticular surfaces. Thus, the phyllosphere represents a significant refuge and resource of microorganisms on this planet. Often-used terms in phyllosphere microbiology are epiphyte and epiphytic (Leben, 1965; Hirano and Upper, 1983): here, microbial epiphytes or epiphytic microorganisms, which include bacteria, fungi and yeasts, are defined as being cap- able of surviving and thriving on plant leaf and fruit surfaces. Several excellent reviews on phyllosphere microbiology have appeared so far (Beattie and Lindow, 1995, 1999; Andrews and Harris, 2000; Hirano and Upper, 2000; Lindow and Leveau, 2002; Lindow and Brandl, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Bacteria in Health and Disease Eamonn M
    Gut Bacteria in Health and Disease Eamonn M. M. Quigley, MD, FRCP, FACP, FACG, FRCPI Dr Quigley is chief of the Division of Abstract: A new era in medical science has dawned with the real- Gastroenterology and Hepatology at ization of the critical role of the “forgotten organ,” the gut micro- Houston Methodist Hospital in Houston, biota, in health and disease. Central to this beneficial interaction Texas. between the microbiota and host is the manner in which bacteria Address correspondence to: and most likely other microorganisms contained within the gut Dr Eamonn M. M. Quigley communicate with the host’s immune system and participate in Division of Gastroenterology and a variety of metabolic processes of mutual benefit to the host Hepatology and the microbe. The advent of high-throughput methodologies Houston Methodist Hospital and the elaboration of sophisticated analytic systems have facili- 6550 Fannin Street tated the detailed description of the composition of the microbial Houston, TX 77030; Tel: 713-441-0853; constituents of the human gut, as never before, and are now Fax: 713-790-3089; enabling comparisons to be made between health and various E-mail: [email protected] disease states. Although the latter approach is still in its infancy, some important insights have already been gained about how the microbiota might influence a number of disease processes both within and distant from the gut. These discoveries also lay the groundwork for the development of therapeutic strategies that might modify the microbiota (eg, through the use of probiot- ics). Although this area holds much promise, more high-quality trials of probiotics, prebiotics, and other microbiota-modifying approaches in digestive disorders are needed, as well as labora- tory investigations of their mechanisms of action.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 7.Normal Flora of Human Body(290
    MODULE Normal Flora of Human Body Microbiology 7 Notes NORMAL FLORA OF HUMAN BODY 7.1 INTRODUCTION In a healthy human, the internal tissues, e.g. blood, brain, muscle, etc., are normally free of microorganisms. However, the surface tissues, i.e., skin and mucous membranes, are constantly in contact with environmental organisms and become readily colonized by various microbial species. The mixture of organisms regularly found at any anatomical site is referred to as the normal flora. The normal flora of humans consists of a few eucaryotic fungi and protists, but bacteria are the most numerous and obvious microbial components of the normal flora. A healthy foetus in utero is free from microorganisms. During birth the infant in exposed to vaginal flora. Within a few hours of birth oral and nasopharyngeal flora develops and in a day or two resident flora of the lower intestine appears OBJECTIVES After reading this lesson, you will be able to: z describe normal flora z enlist the Advantages and Disadvantages of flora z describe the normal flora of various parts of the body 7.2 NORMAL MICROBIAL FLORA The term “normal microbial flora” denotes the population of microorganisms that inhabit the skin and mucous membranes of healthy normal persons. The skin and mucous membranes always harbor a variety of microorganisms that can be arranged into two groups: 78 MICROBIOLOGY Normal Flora of Human Body MODULE 1. The resident flora consists of relatively fixed types of microorganisms Microbiology regularly found in a given area at a given age; if disturbed, it promptly reestablishes itself. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaea: Essential Inhabitants of the Human Digestive Microbiota Vanessa Demonfort Nkamga, Bernard Henrissat, Michel Drancourt
    Archaea: Essential inhabitants of the human digestive microbiota Vanessa Demonfort Nkamga, Bernard Henrissat, Michel Drancourt To cite this version: Vanessa Demonfort Nkamga, Bernard Henrissat, Michel Drancourt. Archaea: Essential inhabi- tants of the human digestive microbiota. Human Microbiome Journal, Elsevier, 2017, 3, pp.1-8. 10.1016/j.humic.2016.11.005. hal-01803296 HAL Id: hal-01803296 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01803296 Submitted on 8 Jun 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Human Microbiome Journal 3 (2017) 1–8 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Human Microbiome Journal journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/humic Archaea: Essential inhabitants of the human digestive microbiota ⇑ Vanessa Demonfort Nkamga a, Bernard Henrissat b, Michel Drancourt a, a Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, CNRS, IRD, URMITE, Marseille, France b Aix-Marseille-Université, AFMB UMR 7257, Laboratoire «architecture et fonction des macromolécules biologiques», Marseille, France article info abstract Article history: Prokaryotes forming the
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Flora-Mediated Metabolic Health, the Risk Produced by Dietary Exposure to Acetamiprid and Tebuconazole
    foods Article Gut Flora-Mediated Metabolic Health, the Risk Produced by Dietary Exposure to Acetamiprid and Tebuconazole Jingkun Liu 1, Fangfang Zhao 2, Yanyang Xu 1 , Jing Qiu 1,* and Yongzhong Qian 1 1 Institute of Quality Standards & Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Quality and Safety, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agri-Food Quality and Safety, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (Y.X.); [email protected] (Y.Q.) 2 Analysis & Testing Center, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The low-level and long-term exposure of pesticides was found to induce metabolic syn- drome to mice. Metabolic pathways and mechanisms were investigated by detecting gut flora with metabolites, host circulation, and their interrelations. Results showed that the abundances of flora species and their metabolism were altered, consequently leading to metabolic disorders. A correlation analysis between gut flora and their metabolic profiling further explained these changes and associations. The metabolic profiling of host circulation was also performed to characterize metabolic disorders. The associations of host circulation with gut flora were established via their significantly different metabolites. Alterations to the liver metabolism clarified potential pathways and mechanisms for the disorders. Metabolic disorders were evidently released by dietary and micro-ecological intervention, directly proving that gut flora comprise a vital medium in metabolic health risk caused by pesticide exposure. This work supplied theoretical bases and intervention Citation: Liu, J.; Zhao, F.; Xu, Y.; Qiu, J.; Qian, Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods in Microbiome Research Namrata Iyer
    TECHNOLOGY FEATURE Methods in microbiome research Namrata Iyer From the freezing lakes of Antarctica to satisfied most of these requirements. The metametabolomics are more technically the thermal vents deep within the oceans, most widely used method in microbiome challenging, given the sheer diversity of microbes have managed to survive and analysis is 16s rRNA sequencing2. The proteins and metabolites that each microbe thrive in the most inhospitable of con- 16s rRNA gene is highly conserved in all can produce. While these techniques are ditions. Unsurprisingly, the relatively bacteria and sequencing of its regions of still in their infancy, they promise to reveal luxurious abode of the human body is hyper- variability allows the identification unique insights into the communication chockablock with microbial life. We have of different bacterial species. But this tech- and cooperation between the different coevolved over centuries with these micro- nique suffers from inaccuracies at species members of the microbiota, and also host- organisms, collectively referred to as our level classification2. Furthermore, it limits microbiota interactions. microbiota, resulting in a relationship the analysis to only bacterial species while that is mutually beneficial. However, it has ignoring other members in the community. Microbiota structure only been in the past few decades that the Platforms are now being developed that can Community structure is a function of who importance of the microbiota to human couple this technique with other genetic is present in the microbiota community health has been uncovered. It is now well- markers, allowing detection of eukaryotic and how these members interact with each known that imbalance in the microbiota— members of the microbiota as well3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nasal Microbiota: Diversity, Dynamicity, and Vaccine-Mediated Effects
    THE NASAL MICROBIOTA: DIVERSITY, DYNAMICITY, AND VACCINE-MEDIATED EFFECTS Jane C. Deng, M.D., M.S. Associate Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles Section Chief, Pulmonary and Critical Care Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan Why do we care about the nasopharyngeal microbiota? • Pneumonia – bacterial and influenza – is a leading cause of death in the United States and worldwide • 1.3 million child deaths annually (O’Brien, et al, Lancet 2009) • We believe the upper respiratory tract flora informs, to a large extent, the microbiota of the lower respiratory tract (LRT) and is a precursor to LRT infections (e.g., pneumonia) • Involved in maintenance and dissemination of pathogens across the population • May also govern the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria from different genera “The Big Four” in the nasopharynx Streptococcus Staphylococcu pneumoniae s aureus Moraxella Haemophilus catarrhalis influenzae Sources: http://imgtagram.com/rewtos2d-streptococcus-pneumoniae-bacteria/ List of members of the “normal” bacterial flora in the nose and oropharynx (partial) • Staph epi • Propionobacteria Our bodies are • Staph aureus • Streptococcus pneumoniae“colonized” with • Strept pyogenes potentially pathogenic • Neisseria spp (including meningitidis)bacteria • Haemophilus influenzae • Mycoplasma • Corynebacterium diphtheriae (less common member of the normal flora after vaccination) Unanswered questions • How does bacterial colonization happen in the first
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Microbial Flora on Skin of Health Care Providers in a Tertiary
    Review Article Clinician’s corner Images in Medicine Experimental Research Case Report Miscellaneous Letter to Editor DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2018/37717.12266 Original Article Postgraduate Education A Study on Microbial Flora on Skin of Case Series Health Care Providers in a Tertiary Microbiology Section Microbiology Care Hospital in Southern India Short Communication MATHAVI SURESHKUMAR1, R SURIYAPRABA2, R INDRA PRIYADHARSINI3 ABSTRACT and subjected to bacterial and fungal culture. Blood agar and Introduction: Human skin is constantly covered with MacConkey agar was used for bacterial culture and Sabouraud’s microorganisms both commensals and pathogens depending dextrose agar for fungal culture. The bacterial isolates were then on topography, environmental factors and host factors. subjected to antibiotic sensitivity testing. Though these organisms are regarded as commensals in Results: Bacterial growth was observed in all the HCWs immunocompetent individuals, they can become pathogenic (100%) and fungus was isolated from eight HCWs (6.2%). in immunocompromised persons especially in hospitalised Among the bacterial isolates, Diphtheroids (47) were the individuals. In recent years, Staphylococcus epidermidis is predominant isolate accounting for 29% followed by coagulase regarded as an agent of hospital and community acquired negative Staphylococcus (39) which was 24% of isolates. The infections. When the health care workers do not wash their predominant pathogen isolated was Staphylococcus aureus hands between patients or do not practice standard infection (15%, 25 isolates). 17% (11 isolates) of Staphylococci were control measures, they are responsible for transmission of resistant to Cefoxitin which indicates both MRSA and MR-CONS. nosocomial infections. Among gram-negative isolates, most of them were resistant to Aim: This study was done to know the microbial flora on skin ampicillin, cotrimoxazole and cephalosporins.
    [Show full text]