Pepsi Versus Coca-Cola Versus RC-Cola

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pepsi Versus Coca-Cola Versus RC-Cola 2012 RESEARCH PAPER A Comparative Analysis of the Customer’s Perception on Carbonated Drinks: Pepsi versus Coca-Cola versus RC-Cola Neeru Mundra*, Karishma Gulati** and Ruchi Gupta*** Abstract This is an extensive research of the consumer perception of the cola drinks (Pepsi, Coca-Cola and RC Cola) and the Market Potential of Coca-Cola, Pepsi and RC Cola. It covers an extensive survey and depicts all graphs, facts and figures of two companies. It begins with the introduction of carbonated drinks and introduction of these companies. These companies have interests in various sectors and they provide consistent quality products to meet customer’s requirement worldwide. This paper clearly mentions the objective of the study and the research methodology utilised for the study. The data collection method used is structured, non-disguised questionnaire in which the types of questions used are open ended, and multiple choice and close ended. The paper contains a detailed view of the tasks, which has been undertaken to analyse the market of COLAs. Various sets of questions have been prepared to know the preferences of consumers about these COLAS. The research areas are Delhi and NCR. In this study, researcher found that most of the consumers prefer Pepsi as their 1st preference and then Coca-Cola, but the low income group people prefers RC Cola. Besides, this it also studies the customer feedback about the Coca Cola, Pepsi and RC Cola. Thus, it can be said that the broad goal of the research “To study the consumers’ preference for cola” as a whole. The research work was done through the collection of primary data and secondary data by questionnaire through the market survey technique. Thus, based on the research, conclusions and suggestions have been made to make the performance of COLA better. Objectives of the Research Paper are to conduct comparative analysis of the perception of customers about various COLA DRINKS (Coca-Cola Vs Pepsi Vs RC Cola), to identify the most preferred COLA DRINK among the consumers, to identify the factors affecting the purchase decision of COLA DRINKS and to identify the type of advertising strategy majorly influencing the customers’ buying behavior with a special focus on deriving the relationship between the celebrity endorsements and buying behavior of consumer. Introduction country because it not only contributes to export The Carbonated Drinks Industry in India: A earnings of the country but acts as a revenue driver for other industries such as glass, refrigeration, Perspective transport, paper and sugar. This segment is univer- The Indian carbonated industry is worth Rs 60-bil- sal in its demand, catering to all income groups and lion and growing now at 5% annually with a age-brackets. compound annual growth rate of 4.5% where Coke The battle between two Cola giants, Coke & Pepsi, and Pepsi have a combined market share of around did not go any slow. Rather it has become fiercer. 95% directly or through franchisees. Surprisingly, They are now fighting with each other even at the in 2010 the growth of Carbonated Soft Drinks local level. The 50-bn-rupee soft drink industry is declined due to the entry of Non carbonated alterna- growing now at 6 to 7% annually. In India, Coke tives in many markets around the world. Moreover, and Pepsi have a combined market share of around the Aerated Beverages is an important sector in the 95% directly or through franchisees. Campa Cola * She pursued her Ph.D and ** She is pursuing her *** She is pursuing her Masters of Engineering (ITEB) Ph.D in Managementfrom Ph.D. in Management from Birla Institute of Technol- DTU (formerly known from BanasthaliVidyapith. ogy & Science, (BITS) Pilani, as Delhi College of En- She has done her Masters Rajasthan and approved PhD gineering). She is NET in Business Administra- Guide of Modi Institute of (Management) qualified tion with First Division Technology. She has more and has done her Mas- from Jaipuria Institute of than ten years of experience in ters in Business Admin- Management, Lucknow. academia. She has conducted istrationfrom BCIPS and She also holds the degree various training programs for holds the degree of BE in of MCom, BCom from Corporate like Wipro, State CSE from BMIET, MDU Lucknow University. She Bank of India, Hindustan Zinc Rohtak. She has more than is having experience of 3 Ltd, Canara Bank, Bank of Rajasthan, Bengal Ambuja Cement two years of experience in academia. She has pub- years in academia as a Teaching Assistant in IIM Luc- etc. She has attended various seminars and workshops. She has lished research papers in various Management Jour- know. Her area of interests are Marketing Manage- published papers in various Management Journal of Interna- nal of International and National repute. She has also ment, Retail Management and General Management tional and National repute. She has also published a book titled attended various seminars and workshops, related to etc. She has authored various research papers which “Introduction to Information Technology” by Himalaya Pub- SPSS. E-mail: [email protected] have been published in various Management Journal lishing House. She was also an Editor of Journal of Practicing of International and National repute. E-mail: mahesh- Managers. E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Copyright by the MAEER’s MIT School of Management - Post Graduate Research Centre. All Rights Reserved. 1 MITSOM PGRC KJIMRP Vol. III - Issue 02 September - December has a 1% share, and the rest is divided amongst the 2001-02 262 local players. According to the Industry watchers, fake products also account for a good share of the 2002-03 279 balance. There are about 110 soft drinks produc- ing units (60% being owned by Indian bottlers) 2003-04 291 in the country, employing about 125,000 people. 2004-05 310 There are two distinct segments of the market, Cola and Non-Cola drinks. The Cola segment claims a 2005-06 330 share of 62%, while the Non-Cola segment includes soda, clear lime, cloudy lime and drinks with orange 2006-07 359 and mango flavours. The per capita consumption of 2007-08 373 soft drinks in India is around 5 to 6 bottles (same as Nepal’s) compared to Pakistan’s 17 bottles, Sri 2008-09 388 Lanka’s 21, Thailand’s 73, the Philippines 173 2009-10 403 and Mexico 605. The industry contributes over Rs 12 bn to the exchequer and exports goods worth 2014-15 479 Rs 2 bn. It may be recalled that Coca-Cola, the world’s number one player, was present in India for a long time in collaboration with an Indian producer but was thrown out in the late 1970s. It Market Growth Rates reappeared in India following the economic liber- alisation era - but after its rival, world’s number 1990-91 - 1996-97 9.4% two, had already entered in a big way following a long and tough fight against the opposition from the 1996-97 - 2001-02 7.8% domestic producers. When Coca-Cola re-entered, it installed a new milestone. It can also be depicted 2001-02 - 2006-07 6.5% through this data also: 2004-05 - 2009-10 5.4% Aerated Soft Drinks 2009-10 - 2014-15 3.5% Demand: Past & Future Sensitivity Coefficient 5.2% Year mn cases 1990-91 105 1991-92 115 Market Segmentation 1992-93 125 Segment Share (%) 1993-94 135 1994-95 150 North 24 1995-96 165 East 18 1996-97 180 West 32 1997-98 194 South 26 1998-99 209 1999-00 225 Rural 30 2000-01 243 Urban 70 2 2012 A Comparative Analysis of the Customer’s Perception on Carbonated Drinks: Pepsi versus Coca-Cola versus RC-Cola Market Structure ment and highlights the importance of adopting a “sensory marketing approach,” said the research- Product Variation ers from French research organisation Adriant, the Company Share (%) University of Rennes 1, DANONE R&D, and Insti- tute Paul Bocuse. “Companies need to continuously Cola Drinks: innovate to maintain market leadership,” wrote the Thums Up 29 researchers. “When the market is overloaded the challenge consists in creating innovative products Coca Cola 25 able to attract and satisfy consumers.” “This exper- Pepsi 18 iment showed the feasibility of the proposed multi- sensory design method based on mixed qualita- Source: Food & Beverages Industry Report tive and quantitative approaches.” The study also demonstrates the importance of flavour and colour Literature Review selection for new products. The global flavours A Study of Factors Responsible for Brand Pref- market was been valued at some US$18 bn in 2006 erence in FMCG Sector (Business Insights). Meanwhile, the value of the The purpose of this paper is the study of factors international colouring market was estimated at responsible for brand preference in FMCG products, around $1.15 bn in 2007 (€731m), up 2.5 per cent increasing competition, more due to globalisation, is from $1.07 bn (680m) in 2004, according to Leath- erhead Food International (LFI). Natural colours motivating many companies to base their strategies now make up 31 per cent of the colouring market, almost entirely on building brands. Brand prefer- compared with 40 per cent for synthetics, accord- ence means to compare the different brands and opt ing to LFI. for the most preferred brand. This brand preference is influenced by various factors. According to this study many factors were find out for preferring a brand like Bombarding the Senses By choosing to formulate a new beverage, the • Brand persona researchers noted that the new product would • Brand constancy need to be differentiated by improving the sensory • Brand loftiness characteristics. Four factors were identified for the • Brand value formulation: four colour intensities, three flavour- ings, two label types (soft versus hard), and two In the identification of factors affecting the brand pack sizes (standard versus oversize).
Recommended publications
  • Kofola Holding (Slovakia)
    European Entrepreneurship Case Study Resource Centre Sponsored by the European Commission for Industry & Enterprise under CIP (Competitiveness and Innovation framework Programme 2007 – 2013) Project Code: ENT/CIP/09/E/N02S001 2011 Kofola Holding (Slovakia) Martina L. Jakl University of Economics, Prague Sascha Kraus University of Liechtenstein This case has been prepared as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either the effective or ineffective handing of a business / administrative situation. You are free: to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work to make derivative works Under the following conditions: Attribution. You must give the original author credit. Non-Commercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the author(s). KOFOLA HOLDING Introduction Martin Klofonda, Marketing Manager of the Slovakian company Kofola Holding, felt relaxed as he sat in his office in early December 2009. The year 2009 had been extremely successful for the beverage producer, and for Martin Klofonda it was clear that in 2010 they would have the ability to invest a substantial amount of money into their brands. As a valued and very experienced manager within the group, he was asked to provide his thoughts for the next management meeting regarding the ongoing planning for the organisation. In the opinion of the CEO, Kofola has a weak presence in the hospitality industry which they want to strengthen, while the organisation would also continue to strengthen its activity in the retail industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Crown Bottling Company Of
    ROYAL CROWN BOTTLING COMPANY OF WINCHESTER, INCORPORATED 10/17/12 TELEPHONE NUMBER (540) 667-1821 FAX NUMBER (540) 667-8040 Wholesale Price List ROYAL CROWN BOTTLING COMPANY OF CHARLES TOWN, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE NUMBER(304) 725-8100 FAX NUMBER (304) 725-9413 PRODUCT/PACKAGE/UPC CODES WHOLESALE PRICE SUGGESTED RETAILS Mt Dew Energy Drinks (plastic) AMP Focus Mixed Berry 16 oz can (12 loose) $19.20 $1.99 012000126338 Item: 133540 VA , MD & WV 20% Margin of Profit AMP Boost Grape 16 oz can (12 loose) $19.20 $1.99 012000382505 Item: 133541 VA, MD & WV 20% Margin of Profit AMP Boost Cherry 16 oz can (12 loose) $1.99 19.20 012000126352 Item: 133542 VA , MD & WV 20% Margin of Profit AMP Boost Original 16 oz 12 pk $1.99 $19.20 012000016431 Item: 133505 20% Margin of Profit VA,MD&WV AMP Boost Original16 oz. 6-4pks $7.89 $38.00 012000017568 Item:133510 VA,MD&WV 20% Margin of Profit PRODUCT/PACKAGE/UPC CODES WHOLESALE PRICE SUGGESTED RETAILS DEER PARK NATURAL SPRING WATER 20 oz Non-Returnable (24-loose) $19.80 $1.19 each 082657077215 Item: 129950 VA, MD & WV 20% Margin of Profit PRODUCT/PACKAGE/UPC CODES WHOLESALE PRICE SUGGESTED RETAILS VINTAGE WATER 1 Liter Non-Returnable (12 per case) $11.00 $1.19 072521051021 Item: 129710 VA, MD & WV 20% Margin of Profit 20 oz Non-Returnable (24 loose) $12.00 $.69 072521051014 Item 129700 VA, MD & WV 20% Margin of Profit PRODUCT/PACKAGE/UPC CODES WHOLESALE PRICE SUGGESTED RETAILS 10 oz Non-Returnable Glass Bottles $10.25 6/$3.19 (4-6 pack) 20% Margin of Profit VA , MD & WV 078000001686 Item: 103100 Canada
    [Show full text]
  • A Neoconventional Trademark Regime for "Newcomer" States
    KHOURYFINALIZED_TWO 3/31/2010 2:02:20 AM A NEOCONVENTIONAL TRADEMARK RÉGIME FOR "NEWCOMER" STATES Amir H. Khoury* INTRODUCTION This research constitutes a (natural) follow-up to an earlier published research paper in which I assessed, through data analysis, the effects of the Paris-TRIPS Conventional Trademark Régime (“CTR”) on countries.1 In that research I devised and applied the Trademark Potential concept. Using that concept I demonstrated that if a country has an inherent Trademark Deficit because of the structure of its industry, the CTR cannot effectively benefit that country's economy. My empirically-based research has shown that the Trademark Potential of a country is not contingent upon its laws’ compatibility with CTR. I have established that CTR compliant laws do not necessarily facilitate market entry for newcomers originating in developing countries. Thus, in that research I have refuted the existence of some of the benefits that are generally associated with CTR. This present research is geared towards considering various avenues for remedying the pitfalls of the CTR by introducing a NeoConventional Trademark Régime (“NCTR”). The aim of this proposed régime would be to facilitate the creation and market entry of brands originating in developing countries into their respective national markets and beyond. In this regard, this research constitutes the culmination of my earlier research because it transcends the diagnostic role pertaining to the CTR and ventures into the realm of offering workable solutions thereto. * Lecturer, Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Law. This article was written while I was a Cegla Fellow. My sincere thanks go to the Cegla Center for Interdisciplinary Research of the Law at the Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University, for its support of this research project.
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 795 795 Complaint IN THE MA TIER OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY FINAL ORDER, OPINION, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT AND SEC. 5 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 9207. Complaint, July 15, 1986--Final Order, June 13, 1994 This final order requires Coca-Cola, for ten years, to obtain Commission approval before acquiring any part of the stock or interest in any company that manufactures or sells branded concentrate, syrup, or carbonated soft drinks in the United States. Appearances For the Commission: Joseph S. Brownman, Ronald Rowe, Mary Lou Steptoe and Steven J. Rurka. For the respondent: Gordon Spivack and Wendy Addiss, Coudert Brothers, New York, N.Y. 798 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Initial Decision 117F.T.C. INITIAL DECISION BY LEWIS F. PARKER, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE NOVEMBER 30, 1990 I. INTRODUCTION The Commission's complaint in this case issued on July 15, 1986 and it charged that The Coca-Cola Company ("Coca-Cola") had entered into an agreement to purchase 100 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of DP Holdings, Inc. ("DP Holdings") which, in tum, owned all of the shares of capital stock of Dr Pepper Company ("Dr Pepper"). The complaint alleged that Coca-Cola and Dr Pepper were direct competitors in the carbonated soft drink industry and that the effect of the acquisition, if consummated, may be substantially to lessen competition in relevant product markets in relevant sections of the country in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Soda Handbook
    Soda Openers A-1 BATHING GIRL, MERMAID OR SURF-GIRL, CLOTHED GIRL (BATHING GIRL), NUDE GIRL (MERMAID), CLOTHED GIRL (SURF- A-001-000 GIRL), MARKED “C.T.& O.CO. PATD.CHICAGO” OR “PATD.”, DESIGNED BY HARRY L. VAUGHAN, DESIGN PATENT NO. 46,762 (12/08/1914), 2 7/8”, DON BULL A-001-001 Drink A-1 (10-12) A-001-047 Acme Bottling Co. (2 Var (A) Clothed (B) Nude) (15-20) A-001-002 Avon More “Have One More” (10-12) A-001-003 Drink B-1 (10-12) A-001-062 Barrett's Soda Water (15-20) A-001-004 Bay View Bottling Works 305 Logan Avenue (10-12) A-001-005 Drink Burk's Soda Water (10-12) Drink Caton Ginger Ale Catonsville, Md. (2 Var (A) Caton Block Letters A-001-006 (15-20) (B) Caton Script Letters) A-001-007 Chero-Cola Bot. Co. Gainesville, Ga. (40-50) A-001-063 Chero Cola Bottling Works (20-25) A-001-008 Coca-Cola (Script) Bottling Co. Baltimore, Md. (175-200) A-001-009 Compliments Of Coca-Cola (Script) Bottling Co. Grand Island, Nebr. (175-200) A-001-010 Oriente Coca-Cola (Script) Bottling Co. (175-200) A-001-011 Sayre Coca-Cola (Block) Bottling Co. Sayre, Okla. (175-200) Compliments Cocheco Bottling Works, Inc. Rochester, N. H. (2 Var (A) A-001-064 (12-15) Text On 2 Lines (B) Text On 3 Lines) Compliments Of Cocheco Bottling Works, Inc. Rochester, N. H. (2 Var A-001-012 (10-12) (A) Clothed Girl (B) Surf Girl) A-001-065 Cola Pleez It's Sodalicious (15-20) A-001-013 Cream Of Cola St.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. HOLOTOVA Et
    Communication Today, 2020, Vol. 11, No. 2 Ing. Mária Holotová, PhD. Faculty of Economics and Management Slovak University of Agriculture RETRO MARKETING – Trieda A. Hlinku 2 949 76 Nitra Slovak Republic A POWER [email protected] Mária Holotová is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Marketing and Trade at the Faculty of Economics OF NOSTALGIA WHICH and Management, SUA in Nitra. She gives lectures related to marketing communication, managerial communication, consumer behaviour, sustainability in food industry and CSR. She has cooperated with the WORKS AMONG Slovak Agricultural and Food Chamber, evaluating and participating in several projects. Her scientific and research activities, as well as the works she has published in foreign and domestic conference proceedings, scholarly journals and monographs, reflect on the above-mentioned issues and topics she is interested in. THE AUDIENCE Ing. Zdenka Kádeková, PhD. Mária HOLOTOVÁ – Zdenka KÁDEKOVÁ – Faculty of Economics and Management Slovak University of Agriculture Ingrida KOŠIČIAROVÁ Trieda A. Hlinku 2 949 76 Nitra ABSTRACT: Slovak Republic The nostalgia behind historic brands and trends is definitely making large waves in the consumer market. With [email protected] a good idea, even the most modern company can engage in a retro revolution. Studies suggest that nostalgia encourages consumers to spend their money by promising an immediate return in the form of happy memories. Zdenka Kádeková is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Marketing and Trade, Faculty of Economics The reason why retro marketing has become increasingly popular in recent years is the linking of the brand and Management, SUA in Nitra. Her lecturing activities are focused on marketing, marketing communication, and the customer at a deeper, emotional level.
    [Show full text]
  • Huge Advertising & Collectible Memorabilia
    09/30/21 12:21:09 Huge Advertising & Collectible Memorabilia Auction for Thomas "Glass" Burroughs Auction Opens: Wed, May 22 6:01pm CT Auction Closes: Sat, Jun 15 9:00am CT Lot Title Lot Title 0001 Forrest City Arkansas Wood Peach Sign 0021 Drink NEHI Beverages Sign 0001A Coca-Cola 36― Button 0021A Both signs for one Bid 0001B Royal Crown Cola Sign 0022 Railroad Metal Sign 0002 Royal Crown Cola Sign 0023 Jacobs 26 Coca-Cola Machine 0002A Drink Coca-Cola Sign 0024 Mobilgas 1936 Double Sided Porcelain Sign 0002B Tab Metal Sign 0025 1927 Coca-Cola porcelain Sign 0003 Pause...Drink Coca-Cola Sign 0026 Coca-Cola Fountain Service Sign 0003A Two Bank Drive In Window Signs 0027 Tuf Nut neon spinning clock 0003B One Way Sign 0027A Double Cola Neon clock 0004 Royal Crown Cola Clay’s Corner Sign 0028 20' trailer load & trailer 0005 Cigarettes 60 cents per pack sign 0029 Anderson Erickson clock 0005A Sklar’s Store Buster Brown advertising 0030 American Die Supplies clock 0005B Coca-Cola 36― Button 0031 Double Cola flange Sign 0005C Royal Crown Cola cooler side 0032 Rummy Grapefruit thermometer 0006 AAA Approved Sign w/hanger 0033 Mail Pouch thermometer 0007 NuGrape Soda Metal Sign 0034 Coca-Cola thermometer 0008 Lucky Dollar Stores double sided enamel Sign 0035 Bubble Up thermometer 0008A Coca-Cola framed advertising 0036 Golden Acres Hybrid Seeds thermometer 0009 “Meteor Mite― framed advertising 0036A Porcelain sign painted R&R 0010 Drink Barq’s “It’s Good― Metal Sign 0037 Dixie Low Ash thermometer 0011 Royal Crown Cola Metal Sign 0038 Triumph Tobacco Cutter 0012 Coca-Cola Fishtail Sign 0039 Winston Cigarettes thermometer 0013 McCulloch Chain Saws Metal Sign 0040 Brown Feed Store thermometer 0014 Royal Crown Cola Metal Sign 0041 American Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Bottles of the Soft Drink Industry in El Paso, Texas
    Bottles on the Border: The History and Bottles of the Soft Drink Industry in El Paso, Texas, 1881-2000 © Bill Lockhart 2010 [Revised Edition – Originally Published Online in 2000] Chapter 10a Chapter 10a Nehi Bottling Co., Nehi-Royal Crown Bottling Co., and Royal Crown Bottling Co. Bill Lockhart The Nehi Bottling Co. arrived at El Paso in 1931. A decade later, the owners renamed the company Nehi-Royal Crown to reflect its popular cola drink. The name, Nehi, was dropped in favor of its younger, still more popular Royal Crown Cola in 1965. In 1970 the company merged with The Seven-Up Bottling Co. of El Paso (in business in El Paso since 1937) to join forces against the two giants of the industry, Coke (Magnolia Coca-Cola Co.) and Pepsi (Woodlawn Bottling Co.), who were engulfing the sales market. The growing company bought out the Canada Dry Bottling Co. that had been in business since 1948. The triple company was in turn swallowed by a newcomer to El Paso, Kalil Bottling Co. of Tucson, Arizona, the firm that continues to distribute products from all three sources in 2010. 391 Nehi Bottling Co. (1931-1941) History Nehi originated with the Chero-Cola Co., started in Columbus, Georgia, by Claude A. Hatcher in 1912. Twelve years later, in 1924, the company initiated Nehi flavors and became the Nehi Corp. soon afterward (Riley 1958:264). The El Paso plant, a subsidiary of the Nehi Bottling Co. of Phoenix, Arizona, opened at 1916 Myrtle Ave. in April 1931, under the direction of Rhea R.
    [Show full text]
  • The John Atzbach Collection, Saturday July 11 - Soda Pop, 1:00PM ET
    09/30/21 07:01:34 The John Atzbach Collection, Saturday July 11 - Soda Pop, 1:00PM ET Auction Opens: Wed, Jul 1 10:00am ET Auction Closes: Sat, Jul 11 1:00pm ET Lot Title Lot Title KA0200 7UP Glass Face Thermometer KA0233 Cloverdale Glass Face Thermometer KA0201 TruAde Glass Face Thermometer KA0234 Coca-Cola Glass Face Thermometer KA0202 Coca-Cola Plastic Face Thermometer KA0235 TruAde Glass Face Thermometer KA0203 Sun-drop Glass Face Thermometer KA0236 Canada Dry Glass Face Thermometer KA0204 NuGrape Glass Face Thermometer KA0237 Crush Glass Face Thermometer KA0205 Dr. Pepper Glass Face Thermometer KA0238 Hires Root Beer Plastic Face Thermometer KA0206 Frostie Root Beer Glass Face Thermometer KA0239 Vernors Glass Face Thermometer KA0207 7UP Glass Face Thermometer KA0240 Diet Rite Cola Glass Face Thermometer KA0208 Dr. Pepper Glass Face Thermometer KA0241 Dr. Pepper Plastic Thermometer KA0209 Double Cola Glass Face Thermometer KA0242 Crush Plastic Thermometer KA0210 Hires Root Beer Glass Face Thermometer KA0243 7UP Single-sided Tin KA0211 7UP Glass Face Thermometer KA0244 Coca-Cola Plastic Thermometer KA0212 Royal Crown Cola Glass Face Thermometer KA0245 Coca-Cola Single-sided Tin Thermometer KA0213 7UP Plastic Face Thermometer KA0246 Grapette Single-sided Tin Thermometer KA0214 Coca-Cola Glass Face Thermometer KA0247 Nesbitt's Single-sided Tin Thermometer KA0215 Crush Glass Face Thermometer KA0248 Coca-Cola Single-sided Tin Thermometer KA0216 Dr. Pepper Glass Face Thermometer KA0249 Dr. Pepper Single-sided Tin Thermometer KA0217 7UP
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY DRINK CONTAINERS - Bottles & Cans by Cecil Munsey Copyright © 2006
    52 Summer 2006 Bottles and Extras Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9 Fig. 10 Fig. 11 Fig. 12 Fig. 13 Fig. 14 Fig. 15 Fig. 16 Fig. 17 Fig. 18 Fig. 19 Fig. 20 Fig. 21 Fig. 22 Fig. 23 Fig. 24 Fig. 25 Fig. 30 Fig. 31 Fig. 26 Fig. 27 Fig. 28 Fig. 29 Fig. 32 > < Fig. 33 Fig. 36 < Fig. 37 Fig. 35 Fig. 38 Fig. 34 > Bottles and Extras Summer 2006 53 ENERGY DRINK CONTAINERS - Bottles & Cans By Cecil Munsey Copyright © 2006 AUTHOR’S NOTE: This article can save you from making a mistake similar to one I made 35+ years ago. I look back now with melancholy at the time while completing the manuscript of my popular study of the Coca-Cola Company’s merchandising history – “The Illustrated Guide to the Collectibles of Cola” (Hawthorn Books, NY). – I consciously did not include a chapter on Coca- Cola cans. Why? I didn’t think that collectors would be interested in “rusty, old tin cans.” I overlooked the entire category except for a few of the early cone-top models and didn’t take into account the successful introduction of aluminum cans and bottles as attractive and long-lasting beverage containers. This article doesn’t make any such mistake; it glorifies a whole, relatively new, category of collectible containers, thus giving collectors the head-start information needed to begin a collection of energy drink cans and bottles. Thanks to eBay and other sources, the current beverages and even those products that didn’t make it in the fast- paced energy drink market, are still available.
    [Show full text]
  • Caffeine: a Healthy Habit?
    Amounts of Caffeine in Products TEA Instant/Brewed Tea (5 min. Brew) ...........................45 Caffeine: Instant Iced Tea (8 oz).............................................25 Food Milligrams Bottled Iced Teas (16 oz)................................. 15-100 A Healthy Habit? Snapple Iced Teas (16 oz)........................................42 DESSERTS/YOGURTS Green Tea ...............................................................30 Small chocolate bar....................................... up to 30 Celestial Seasonings Herbal (all).................................0 Coffee/cappuccino desserts and yogurts ..............8-85 Chocolate Brownie....................................................8 OTHER BEVERAGES Dark chocolate (1 oz)..............................................20 Hot Chocolate (8 oz).................................................5 Milk chocolate (1 oz) ................................................6 Chocolate flavored syrup (1 oz).................................4 COFFEE (6 oz) OVER THE COUNTER DRUGS ® Regular Brewed................................................60-175 Vivarin Tablets .....................................................200 ® Instant ...............................................................60-95 Dexatrim .............................................................200 ® Decaf Brewed.........................................................4.5 Nodoz .................................................................100 ® Instant Decaf.............................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 Table of Contents Worldreginfo - A5b0bd7c-22A0-4C3d-Bf92-42B356aa4e33
    A-0 WorldReginfo - a5b0bd7c-22a0-4c3d-bf92-42b356aa4e33 A. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT ...................................................................................................................................... A-0 KOFOLA AT A GLANCE ............................................................................................................................................... A-4 CHAIRMAN´S STATEMENT ........................................................................................................................................ A-7 KOFOLA GROUP ........................................................................................................................................................ A-9 3.1. Kofola ČeskoSlovensko .................................................................................................................................... A-9 3.2. Kofola Group ................................................................................................................................................... A-9 3.3. Group structure ............................................................................................................................................. A-10 3.4. Successes and Awards in 2018 ...................................................................................................................... A-12 BUSINESS OVERVIEW AND OTHER MATTERS ......................................................................................................... A-13 4.1. Business overview ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]