737 Group Service Bulletin
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
LA REPUBLICA DE VENEZUELA En Su Nombre
LA REPUBLICA DE VENEZUELA en su nombre: el JUZGADO PRIMERO DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA EN LO MERCANTIL DE LA CIRCUNSCRIPCION JUDICIAL DEL DISTRITO FEDERAL Y ESTADO MIRANDA Vistos, con los informes de las parte. Por libelo presentado el día 16 de octubre de 1951, los ciu dadanos doctor CARLOS H. ARANGUREN, JORGE MORRISON, MANUEL LOPEZ BORGES, TEMISTOCLES FERNANDEZ, ALFON SO SUAREZ, ROBERTO BEER, LEONARDO DE ZORDO y ROBER TO MATUTE, todos mayores de edad, casados y domiciliados en la ciudad de Caracas, a excepción del último de los nombrados, domiciliado en la ciudad de Barquisimeto, por intermedio de apo derado, demandaron a la Sociedad Anónima "AEROVIAS VENE ZOLANAS", constituida y domiciliada en Caracas, inscrita en el Registro llevado por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia en lo Mer cantil del Distrito Federal el día 1° de julio de 1943, bajo el núme ro 2566, Tomo A-5 y cuya acta constitutiva fue publicada en la Gaceta Municipal del Gobierno del Distrito Federal número 6.105, de fecha 17 de agosto del mismo año. La demanda se fundamenta en los siguientes hechos: Que el día 15 de diciembre del año próximo pasado y como de doce y media a una pasado meridiano, el avión marca "Douglas" C-47, distinguido con las iniciales Y. V. A. V. U., propiedad de la Com pañía de Transporte Aéreo denominada "AEROVIAS VENEZO LANAS" (AVENSA) S. A., despegó del aeropuerto de la ciudad de Mérida, Estado Mérida, con destino al Aeropuerto de Maique- tía, conduciendo como pasajeros a veintiocho estudiantes, quienes habían comprado previamente sus pasajes y regresaban a esta Capital a pasar pascuas de navidad al lado de sus familiares y entre quienes se encontraban los menores: Juan Ignacio Aran- 2,22 ACCIDENTE AEREO guren, Fredy Morrison, José Ignacio y Francisco Javier López Pacheco, José Vicente Fernández, Aristides y Alfonso José Suárez, Harald Beer, Giorgio de Zordo y Roberto Matute, hijos legítimos de mis representados, respectivamente. -
Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS -
Airline Schedules
Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository: -
C:\Mis Documentos\Terra\Volxiv
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Saber UCV - Catálogo de Revistas Electrónicas (Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad... HUMÁNITAS. Portal temático en Humanidades PARQUES NACIONALES Y MONUMENTOS NATURALES DE VENEZUELA: UN ESFUERZO PARA LA MEMORIA COLECTIVA Rosa M. Estaba.* RESUMEN Venezuela destaca por la proporción (60%) y extensión (54,8 millones de hectáreas) de sus áreas protegidas, en particular por la declaratoria de 43 parques nacionales y 36 monumentos naturales, áreas de máxima restricción y que representan un tercio del total. Tal avance es el resultado de una política del Estado, que se origina en los años 30 y cobra mayor fuerza con el nacimiento de la democracia y sobre todo en los años 90, cuando se logra completar la cobertura de una diversidad de ecosistemas existentes en las diferentes regiones naturales del país. Aparte de servir de garantes de la perpetuidad del patrimonio natural, los parques nacionales y los monumentos naturales protegen cuencas hidrográficas vitales para el abastecimiento de agua potable y de regadío, y para la generación de energía hidroeléctrica. Además, se evidencia su cada vez mayor contribución al creciente desarrollo turístico. No obstante los logros, existe una serie de problemas de administración que vienen encarándose con certeras medidas, pero que realmente encontrarán salida por la vía de la descentralización y la educación ambiental, única vía para fomentar la concientización de la sociedad civil y su consecuente participación. Palábras clave: ÁREAS PROTEGIDAS DE VENEZUELA. SUMMARY Venezuela is outstanding by the proportion (60%) and extension (54,8 million of hectares) of its protected areas, particulary by declaratory of 43 national parks and 36 natural monuments, areas of maximum restriction and which represent a third of the total. -
CHAMPION AEROSPACE LLC AVIATION CATALOG AV-14 Spark
® CHAMPION AEROSPACE LLC AVIATION CATALOG AV-14 REVISED AUGUST 2014 Spark Plugs Oil Filters Slick by Champion Exciters Leads Igniters ® Table of Contents SECTION PAGE Spark Plugs ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Product Features ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Spark Plug Type Designation System ............................................................................................................. 2 Spark Plug Types and Specifications ............................................................................................................. 3 Spark Plug by Popular Aircraft and Engines ................................................................................................ 4-12 Spark Plug Application by Engine Manufacturer .........................................................................................13-16 Other U. S. Aircraft and Piston Engines ....................................................................................................17-18 U. S. Helicopter and Piston Engines ........................................................................................................18-19 International Aircraft Using U. S. Piston Engines ........................................................................................ 19-22 Slick by Champion ............................................................................................................................. -
Format Acrobat
N° 79 SÉNAT SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 1995-1996 Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 21 novembre 1995. AVIS PRÉSENTÉ au nom de la commission des Affaires économiques et du Plan (1) sur le projet de loi de finances pour 1996, ADOPTÉ PAR L'ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE, TOME XIX AVIATION CIVILE ET TRANSPORT AÉRIEN Par M. Jean-François LE GRAND, Sénateur. (1) Cette commission est composée de : MM. Jean François-Poncet, président ; Gérard Larcher, Henri Revol, Jean Huchon, Fernand Tardy, vice-présidents ; Gérard César, William Chervy, Jean-Paul Émin, Louis Minetti, Louis Moinard, secrétaires ; Louis Althapé, Alphonse Arzel, Mme Janine Bardou, MM. Bernard Barraux, Michel Bécot, Georges Berchet, Jean Besson, Claude Billard, Marcel Bony, Jean Boyer, Jacques Braconnier, Gérard Braun, Dominique Braye, Michel Charzat, Marcel-Pierre Cleach, Roland Courteau, Désiré Debavelaere, Gérard Delfau, Fernand Demilly, Marcel Deneux, Rodolphe Désiré, Jacques Dominati, Michel Doublet, Mme Josette Durrieu, MM. Bernard Dussaut, Jean-Paul Emorine, Léon Fatous, Philippe François, Aubert Garcia. François Gerbaud, Charles Ginésy, Jean Grandon, Francis Grignon, Georges Gruillot, Claude Haut, Mme Anne Heinis, MM. Pierre Hérisson, Rémi Herment, Bernard Hugo, Roger Husson, Bernard Joly, Edmond Lauret, Jean-François Le Grand, Félix Leyzour, Kléber Malécot, Jacques de Menou, Louis Mercier, Mme Lucette Michaux-Chevry, MM. Jean-Marc Pastor, Jean Pépin, Daniel Percheron, Jean Peyrafitte, Alain Pluchet, Jean Pourchet, Paul Raoult, Jean-Marie Rausch, Charles Revet, Roger Rigaudière, Roger Rinchet, Jean-Jacques Robert, Jacques Rocca Serra, Josselin de Rohan, René Rouquet, Raymond Soucaret, Michel Souplet, Jacques Sourdille, André Vallet. Voir les numéros : Assemblée nationale (l0ème législ.) : 2222, 2270 à 2275 et T.A. -
Community Relations Plan
Miami International Airport Community Relations Plan Preface .............................................................................................................. 1 Overview of the CRP ......................................................................................... 2 NCP Background ............................................................................................... 3 National Contingency Plan .............................................................................................................. 3 Government Oversight.................................................................................................................... 4 Site Description and History ............................................................................. 5 Site Description .............................................................................................................................. 5 Site History .................................................................................................................................... 5 Goals of the CRP ............................................................................................... 8 Community Relations Activities........................................................................ 9 Appendix A – Site Map .................................................................................... 10 Appendix B – Contact List............................................................................... 11 Federal Officials .......................................................................................................................... -
Airlines Codes
Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios -
Newark International Airport Airline Competition Plan
Newark International Airport Airline Competition Plan Submitted by: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Submitted to: The Federal Aviation Administration As required to be submitted by: The Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment & Reform Act for the 21st Century, Pub. L. 106-181, Section 155 Ms. Woodie Woodward Acting Associate Administrator for Airports Federal Aviation Administration Room 600E, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 December 11, 2000 Re: Newark International Airport—Airline Competition Plan Dear Ms. Woodward: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (The Port Authority) is pleased to provide1 the Airline Competition Plan for Newark International Airport (EWR) as is required to be submitted by The Wendell H. Ford Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21), Pub L. 106-181. The Port Authority is keenly interested in ensuring that residents and businesses in the region are provided with an airport system that provides the highest levels of customer service, generates substantial economic benefits, and provides a large and level platform for airlines to compete for passengers. We view competition as essential to our thriving airport system and are dedicated to allowing existing carriers the opportunity to expand operations and new airlines the opportunity to serve this great metropolitan area. No other airport operator has done more to optimize the operation and efficiency of its facilities to support airline competition. Although the Port Authority is only required by law to submit a competition plan for Newark Airport, that plan must be considered in the context of the overall system of four airports and a commercial heliport owned or operated by the Port Authority within the Port District, an area roughly 25 miles in diameter centering on the Statue of Liberty. -
TRAMS Master Vendor ID List 2/27/2007 Air Interface ID Travel
2/27/2007 TRAMS Master Vendor ID List Air Name Airline No. Travel Category Vendor Id Profile No. Interface ID Abx Air 832 Air 2001 5 GB Action Airlines 410 Air 2002 6 XQ Ada Air 121 Air 2003 7 ZY Adria Airways 165 Air 2004 8 JP Aer Arann Teo 684 Air 2005 9 RE Aer Lingus P.l.c. 53 Air 2006 10 EI Aero Asia International (private) Ltd. 532 Air 2007 11 E4 Aero California 78 Air 2008 12 JR Aero Costa Rica Acori S.a. 802 Air 2009 13 ML Aero Lloyd Flugreisen Gmbh And Co. Luftv 633 Air 2010 14 YP Aerocaribe 723 Air 2011 15 QA Aerochago Airlines S.a. 198 Air 2012 16 G3 Aeroejecutivo S.a. De C.v. 456 Air 2013 17 SX Aeroflot-russian International Airlines 555 Air 2014 18 SU Aerolineas Argentinas 44 Air 2015 19 AR Aerolineas Centrales De Colombia (aces) 137 Air 2016 20 VX Aerolineas Dominicanas S.a. (dominair) 725 Air 2017 21 YU Aerolineas Internacionales S.a. De C.v. 440 Air 2018 22 N2 Aeromar C. Por. A. 926 Air 2019 23 BQ Aeromexico-aerovias De Mexico S.a. De C. 139 Air 2020 24 AM Aeromonterrey S.a. De C.v. 722 Air 2021 25 7M Aeroperlas 828 Air 2022 26 WL Aeroperu - Empresa De Transportes Aereos 210 Air 2023 27 PL Aeroservicios Ecuatorianos C.a. 746 Air 2024 28 2A Aerotransportes Mas De Carga S.a. De C. 865 Air 2025 29 MY Aerovias Colombianas Ltd. (arca) 158 Air 2026 30 ZU Aerovias Venezolanas S.a. -
Un Airline Risk Assessment List
UN AIRLINE RISK ASSESSMENT LIST CATEGORIZATION OF AIRLINES OPERATING IN VENEZUELA 22 May 2012 FOR UN INTERNAL USE ONLY - NOT FOR FURTHER DISTRIBUTION Category A IOSA safety certification Category B: Adheres to basic regulations but not fully safety compliant. Category C: Offers only limited or questionable safety measures. Needs UNORG and ATFP constant review. Category D: Not to be used without new safety assessment have been completed. In exceptional circumstances prior consultation with UNORG's ATFP and Security Focal Point may be granted international flight approval. Airline Overall Category Country of Operation Code(s) Last Comments Score Update Aero Caribe 0,00 D Venezuela May-12 Not in Flight Safe conditions. Aero Fly Monagas 0,00 D Venezuela May-12 Not in Flight Safe conditions. Aerolineas Argentinas 7,24 A Argentina ARG/AR Feb-12 IOSA safety certification. Aeromexico 8,57 A Mexico AMX/AM Feb-12 IOSA safety certification. Aeropostal - Alas de Venezuela 4,76 B Venezuela ALV/VH Feb-12 Not fully safety compliant Aerotecnica SA 0,00 D Venezuela May-12 Not in Flight Safe conditions. Aerovias Caribe Express 0,00 D Venezuela May-12 Not in Flight Safe conditions. Air Canada 8,83 A Canada ACA/AC May-12 IOSA safety certification. Air Europa SA (Air Espana) 8,98 A Spain AEA/UX Feb-12 IOSA safety certification. Air France 8,96 A France AFR/AF Feb-12 IOSA safety certification. Air Iglesias 0,00 D Venezuela May-12 Not in Flight Safe conditions. Albatros Airlines 0,00 D Venezuela May-12 Not in Flight Safe conditions. -
Cooperative Agreements Involving Foreign Airlines: a Review of the Policy of the United States Civil Aeronautics Board Burton A
Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 35 | Issue 4 Article 3 1969 Cooperative Agreements Involving Foreign Airlines: A Review of the Policy of the United States Civil Aeronautics Board Burton A. Landy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Burton A. Landy, Cooperative Agreements Involving Foreign Airlines: A Review of the Policy of the United States Civil Aeronautics Board, 35 J. Air L. & Com. 575 (1969) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol35/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS INVOLVING FOREIGN AIRLINES: A REVIEW OF THE POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD* By BURTON A. LANDYt I. INTRODUCTION T RADITIONALLY, the airline industry has been highly individualistic. Today's air carriers, almost without exception, are the product of these individualistic pioneering efforts. Yet, during the current decade, there has been a notable trend "to band together" rather than the tradi- tional "go it alone" approach. A manifestation of this trend to join up was the merger movement of the early 1960's. This characteristic was due in large part to the poor financial condition of many of the airlines. As the jet transition took place and the financial health of the airlines improved, the merger wave subsided for a time, and the airlines seemed to return to their usual, independent way of doing business.