Die Wikingerzeitlichen Grabbefunde Bei Wiskiauten/Mochovoe Im Kaliningrader Gebiet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Die Wikingerzeitlichen Grabbefunde Bei Wiskiauten/Mochovoe Im Kaliningrader Gebiet Die wikingerzeitlichen Grabbefunde bei Wiskiauten/Mochovoe im Kaliningrader Gebiet Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der philosophischen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Vorgelegt von Nina Dworschak Kiel 2018 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Claus von Carnap-Bornheim Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Matthias Wemhof Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 24.01.2018 Durch den zweiten Prodekan Prof. Dr. Ulrich Müller zum Druck genehmigt am 22.01.2019. Für meinen Vater Helmuth Dworschak Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung.............................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Einführung ........................................................................................................................................1 1.2. Zielsetzung der Arbeit......................................................................................................................4 1.3. Zur Methodik und dem theoretischen Hintergrund...................................................................5 1.4. Siedlungsforschung..........................................................................................................................8 1.5. Oikonyme und Toponomastik des Fundplatzes und der Region.............................................11 2. Forschungsgeschichte und Forschungsstand..............................................................................15 2.1. Von der Entdeckung des Gräberfeldes bis zum Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs......................15 2.2. Die nachkriegszeitlichen Feldforschungen.................................................................................22 2.3. Bemerkungen zur Chronologie im Samland..............................................................................24 3. Zur Quellenlage und Quellenkritik der Altgrabungen............................................................27 3.1. Die Archivalien...............................................................................................................................27 3.1.1. Die Prussia-Sammlung im Museum für Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Berlin.....................28 3.1.2. Die Archivalien im Bundesarchiv, Abteilung Filmarchiv in Berlin......................................29 3.1.3. Das Grenz-Archiv und die Nachlässe von H. Jankuhn, P. Paulsen und C. Engel im Landesmuseum Schleswig-Holstein in Schleswig...................................................................37 3.1.4. Der Nachlass von Carl Engel im Herder Institut für historische Ostmitteleuropaforsch- ung in Marburg, an der Universität Göttingen und auf Schloß Gottorf in Schleswig..........38 3.1.5. Der Nachlass von Birger Nerman in Stockholm.....................................................................38 3.1.6. Der Nachlass von J. Heydeck im Museum für Ermland und Masuren in Olsztyn.............41 3.2. Die verbliebenen Originalfunde ..................................................................................................41 3.2.1. Im Museum für Geschichte und Kunst in Kaliningrad..........................................................42 3.2.2. Teile der Prussia-Sammlung im Museum für Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Berlin...............42 3.2.3. Im Museum für Ermland und Masuren in Olsztyn, Polen....................................................43 4. Bestattungsform- und ritus...................................................................................................45 4.1. Die Prä- und Postwikingerzeitlichen Befunde in der Kaup.......................................................47 4.2. Grabformen.....................................................................................................................................53 4.2.1. Die Brandgräber..........................................................................................................................56 4.2.1.1. Typ A Brandgrubengräber......................................................................................................57 4.2.1.2. Typ B Brandschüttungsgräber................................................................................................57 4.2.1.3. Typ C Urnengräber..................................................................................................................58 4.2.1.4. Typ D bitrituelle Gräber..........................................................................................................60 4.2.2. Körpergräber................................................................................................................................60 4.2.2.1. Typ A Erdgräber.......................................................................................................................61 4.2.2.2. Typ B Sarggräber.......................................................................................................................61 4.3. Leere Gräber....................................................................................................................................63 4.4. Sonderbestattungen........................................................................................................................65 4.4.1. Mögliches Bootsgrab...................................................................................................................66 4.4.2. Mehrfachbestattungen................................................................................................................66 4.4.2.1. Grabhügel 163 (Kat.–Nrn. 71; 151)........................................................................................66 4.4.2.2. Dreipersonen Bestattung (Kat.–Nr. 104)...............................................................................68 4.4.2.3. Massengrab (Kat.–Nrn. 142–149)............................................................................................70 4.4.2.4 Mögliche Doppelbestattung von einer Mutter mit ihrem neugeborenen Kind.................73 4.4.3. Bestattung in Bauchlage...............................................................................................................75 4.4.4. Nachbestattung..............................................................................................................................77 4.5. Die Grabhügel..................................................................................................................................78 4.6. Die Kleine Kaup – der spätheidnische Aschenplatz...................................................................82 4.7. Bermerkungen zur Interpretation von Kultstätten innerhalb des Gräberfelds.......................88 4.8. Anthropologische Untersuchungen.............................................................................................92 4.9. Fazit und Interpretation.................................................................................................................93 5. Fundmaterial....................................................................................................................................97 5.1. Wafen- und Pferdezubehör...........................................................................................................99 5.1.1. Schwerter....................................................................................................................................101 5.1.1.1. Schwertortbänder...................................................................................................................111 5.1.2. Lanzenspitzen............................................................................................................................114 5.1.3. Pfeilspitzen.................................................................................................................................117 5.1.4. Äxte.............................................................................................................................................117 5.1.5. Schildbuckel...............................................................................................................................118 5.1.6. Pferdezubehör............................................................................................................................119 5.1.6.1. Steigbügel................................................................................................................................120 5.1.6.2. Sporen......................................................................................................................................125 5.1.6.3. Zaumzeug...............................................................................................................................129 5.1.6.4. Glöckchen................................................................................................................................131 5.1.6.5. Schnallen.................................................................................................................................132 5.1.7. Exkurs: Vergleich zur Zusammensetzung und Quantität von Wafengräbern auf wikingerzeitlichen Gräberfeldern............................................................................................133 5.2. Tracht- und Körperschmuck......................................................................................................136 5.2.1. Fibeln..........................................................................................................................................137 5.2.1.1. Schalenfbeln...........................................................................................................................137
Recommended publications
  • Suffolk Institute of Archaeology and Natural History
    Proceedingsof the SUFFOLK INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY 4 °4vv.es`Egi vI V°BkIAS VOLUME XXV, PART 1 (published 1950) PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY BY W. E. HARRISON & SONS, LTD., THE ANCIENT HOUSE, IPSWI611. The costof publishing this paper has beenpartially defrayedby a Grant from the Council for British Archeology. THE SUTTON HOO SHIP-BURIAL Recenttheoriesand somecommentsongeneralinterpretation By R. L. S. BRUCE-MITFORD, SEC. S.A. INTRODUCTION The Sutton Hoo ship-burial was discovered more than ten years ago. During these years especially since the end of the war in Europe has made it possible to continue the treatment and study of the finds and proceed with comparative research, its deep significance for general and art history, Old English literature and European archmology has become more and more evident. Yet much uncertainty prevails on general issues. Many questions cannot receive their final answer until the remaining mounds of the grave-field have been excavated. Others can be answered, or at any rate clarified, now. The purpose of this article is to clarify the broad position of the burial in English history and archmology. For example, it has been said that ' practically the whole of the Sutton Hoo ship-treasure is an importation from the Uppland province of Sweden. The great bulk of the work was produced in Sweden itself.' 1 Another writer claims that the Sutton Hoo ship- burial is the grave of a Swedish chief or king.' Clearly we must establish whether it is part of English archxology, or of Swedish, before we can start to draw from it the implications that we are impatient to draw.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Hügelgräber Von Alt-Uppsala
    Mag. Dr. Friedrich Grünzweig PS Proseminar: Archäologie in Skandinavien LV-Nr. 130069 WS 2015/16 Die Hügelgräber von Alt-Uppsala Mag. Ulrich Latzenhofer Matrikel-Nr. 8425222 Studienkennzahl 033 668 Studienplancode SKB241 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Vorbemerkung .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Grabungen und Funde ......................................................................................................... 4 3 Chronologische Einordnung ............................................................................................... 7 3.1 Hügelgräber ................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Grabbeigaben ............................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Literarische Überlieferung ........................................................................................... 8 4 Anordnung der Hügelgräber ............................................................................................. 10 5 Literaturverzeichnis .......................................................................................................... 13 5.1 Quellen ....................................................................................................................... 13 5.2 Forschungsliteratur .................................................................................................... 13 3 1 Vorbemerkung Nach
    [Show full text]
  • Swedbalt 20-40 TL
    1 Thomas Lundén draft 2018-09-02 The dream of a Balto-Scandian Federation: Sweden and the independent Baltic States 1918-1940 in geography and politics This paper will focus on the attempts by Swedish and Baltic geographers in the inter-war period to discuss a geopolitical regionalism defined by Sweden, Finland and the three Baltic States, and the political use of the so called Balto-Scandian concept1. Introduction For a long time in the 20th century, the Baltic region, or Baltikum2, here defined as the area south of the Gulf of Finland and east of the Baltic Sea, was more or less a white spot on the mental map of Swedish politicians and social scientists alike. The “inventor” of geopolitics, political scientist and conservative politician Rudolf Kjellén, urged for Swedish cultural and economic activism towards the Baltic part of Tsarist Russia (Marklund, 2014, 195-199, see also Kuldkepp, 2014, 126), but the program was never implemented, and the break-up of the Russian Empire and the new geopolitical situation, as well as Kjellén’s death in 1922, with a few exceptions put a new end to Swedish academic interests in the contemporary geopolitical situation of the area. From Eastern Baltic point of view, any super-state regionalism with Norden3 was primarily connected with Estonia, in combination with Sweden (Kuldkepp 2010, 49, 2015). Sweden and Estonia thus played a special role in the Baltic discussion about regionalism. The independence of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in 1919-1920 gave Sweden a geopolitical buffer to the neighboring great powers Russia/Soviet Union and Germany, which were initially weakened and politically unstable.
    [Show full text]
  • Fornvännen 1947
    ARKEOLOGISK DATERING AV VENDELTIDENS NORDISKA RUNINSKRIFTER Av Birger Nerman IXuuiorskningen måste för de tider, vilka ligga före hedendomens sista århundraden, i regel bygga på den kronologi, som kan upp­ ställas med ledning av inskrifterna på arkeologiskt till tiden be­ stämbara föremål eller monument. Dessa fördela sig emellertid mycket ojämnt. Medan vi äga åt- .skilliga runförsedda föremål eller monument, som kunna dateras lill 200- och 300-talen, och en stor mängd, som 'härröra ifrån tiden ca 400—ca 550, är perioden ca 550—ca 800 mycket svagt företrädd, varemot tiden efter ca 800 åter blir rikare representerad. Länge har man för tiden ca 550—ca 800, inom arkeologien numera ofta kallad Vendeltiden, t. o. m. trott sig helt sakna arkeologiskt dater­ bara runinskrifter. Att just Vendeltiden ifråga om de arkeologiskt daterbara före­ målen eller monumenten utgjort eller ansetts utgöra en lucka har för vår kännedom om språkutvecklingen i Norden varit ytterst ogynnsamt. De runinskrifter, som ligga före ca 550, visa det ur­ nordiska språket, medan de, som ligga efter ca 800, äro avfattade i det senare, litterära språket. Men då man icke hade några arkeo­ logiska hållpunkter, fick inan inpassa runinskrifterna i luckan på ett ungefär, så som man tyckte den språkliga utvecklingen lämp­ ligen kunde ha förlupit. Man satte då gränsen mellan det urnor­ diska och det senare språket till omkring år 800. På senare årtionden har, som bekant, luckan ca 550—ca 800 bör­ jat fyllas. Början gjordes 1917 med Eggjum-stenen ifrån Sogndal Her­ red i Sogn i Norge. De äldre minnas, vilket uppseende upptäckten av denna väckte.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saga of King Hrolf Kraki Free
    FREE THE SAGA OF KING HROLF KRAKI PDF Jesse L. Byock | 144 pages | 03 Jun 2015 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780140435931 | English | London, United Kingdom Hrólfr Kraki - Wikipedia The consensus view is that Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian traditions describe the same people. Proponents of this theory, like J. Tolkien[11] argue that both the names Beowulf lit. Bodvar Bjarki is constantly associated with bears, his father actually being one. This match supports the hypothesis that the adventure with the dragon is also originally derived from the same story. When Haldan died of old age, Helghe and Ro divided the kingdom so that Ro ruled the land, and Helghe the sea. This resulted in a daughter named Yrse. Much later, he met Yrse, and without knowing that she was his daughter, he made her pregnant with Rolf. Eventually, Helghe found out that Yrse was his own daughter and, out of shame, went east and killed himself. Both Helghe and Ro being dead, a Swedish king, called Hakon in the Chronicon Lethrense proper, and Athisl in the Annales — corresponding to Eadgils — forced the Danes to accept a dog as king. The dog king was succeeded by Rolf Krage. Rolf Krage was a big The Saga of King Hrolf Kraki in body and soul and was so generous that no one asked him for anything twice. This Hartwar arrived in Zealand with a large army and said that he wanted to give his tribute to Rolf, but killed Rolf together with all his men. Only one survived, Wiggwho played along until he was to do homage to Hartwar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Bronze Artefacts of Viking Age Eastern Baltic Types Discovered on Gotland Iron Age Networks and Identities
    The distribution of Bronze artefacts of Viking Age Eastern Baltic types discovered on Gotland Iron Age Networks and Identities Triangular dress pin discovered in Västerhejde; from the original catalogue of the Swedish History Museum, 1895 Gotland University 2013/Spring Master (one year) thesis/Magisteruppsats Author: Daniel Gunnarsson School of Culture, Energy and Environment 1 Supervisors: Helene Martinsson-Wallin & Alexander Andreeff Abstract This thesis has compared the distribution of certain types of Viking Age Eastern Baltic bronze artifacts discovered on Gotland. This was done in order to observe different parts of Gotland´s interaction with different groups in the Baltic Sea region and how this might have influenced the identities and ideas of the individuals involved in the interaction. The objects and their finding contexts were subjected to a geographical analysis and applied to a map of Viking Age Gotland. Different distribution can be observed for different types of artifacts, as well as a shift in patterns of interaction in the Baltic Sea region over time. Denna uppsats har jämfört spridningsmönstren för olika vikingatida objekt från Baltikum som påträffats på Gotland. Detta för att kunna studera hur olika delar av Gotland har interagerat med andra grupper i Östersjöregionen och hur detta kan ha influerat individens identiteter och idéer. Föremålen samt deras kontexter har analyserats geografiskt, samt applicerats på en karta över det vikingatida Gotland. Olika spridningsmönster kunde observeras för olika typer av artefakter. Även förändringar i interaktionsmönstret över tid i östersjöregionen kunde noteras. Keywords: Eastern Baltic, Viking Age, Baltic Sea, Gotland, Interaction, Networks, Cross- cultural, Identity 2 Table of Content Abstract ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tendencies in Gotland's History-Writing, 1850–2010
    In the shadow of the Middle Ages? Tendencies in Gotland’s history-writing, 1850–2010 Samuel Edquist Previous research on history-writing and other forms of the use of history has so far to a large extent analysed national and ethnic identities and their formation through narratives of the past.1 Other territorial identity projects have been less studied, relatively speaking. Still, the importance of the past is just as obvious in local, regional, and supranational identity projects.2 The latter have largely used similar mechanisms as those used in the nationalist projects, at least on the discursive level. Not only do geographical and contemporary cultural aspects delineate the regional ‘us’, but, more than that, do so by telling and retelling a common narrative about the past. ‘We’ have always lived here, ‘we’ have shared a common destiny down the centuries. In this study, I will analyse regional identity construction on Gotland. Gotland is the largest of all the Baltic islands, with a population of some 57,000 and a land area of 3,000 km2. It is one of Sweden’s twenty-five historical provinces (landskap), and constitutes a separate county (län). The province of Gotland also includes some smaller islands. The only inhabited one is Fårö, a separate parish at Gotland’s north-eastern edge, with some 550 inhabitants and a land area of 114 km2. Some of the uninhabited islands—Gotska Sandön, Stora Karlsö, and Lilla Karlsö—have nevertheless played a role in regional topography and history-writing, thanks to their distinctive landscape and as somewhat exotic places where historical events of the more curious and thrilling kind have taken place.3 1 Among numerous examples, see, for example, T.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cosmopolitan History of Archaeology: the Olov Janse Case
    Källén, A and Hegardt, J 2014 A Cosmopolitan History of Archaeology: The Olov Janse Case. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, 24: 7, pp. 1–13, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bha.247 PAPER A Cosmopolitan History of Archaeology: The Olov Janse Case Anna Källén* and Johan Hegardt† This article has been corrected here: The life of international archaeologist Olov Janse (1892–1985) demonstrates the complexity of personal identify formation. Janse worked in Europe, Scandinavia, South East Asia and North America, spoke many different languages, controlled many collections of artefacts, changed iden- tity or character at least five times, and nationality, three times. It is hoped the themes, elu- cidated through Janse’s story, will encourage comparisons with, and analyses of, the careers of other cosmopolitan archaeologists, and instigate an international history of archaeology focused on mobility, translation and networks, rather than one based on the impact of archaeology on the development of nation-states. Introduction 2004; Murray and Evans 2008) and papers (e.g. Evans This paper proposes comparative outlines for a cosmo- 1995) have provided historical examples of international politan history of archaeology, defined primarily by mobil- archaeology. While these have served as ‘eye-openers’ to ity, translation and networks. It intends to complement the broader uses of archaeology, we find them less theo- the history of archaeology’s traditional focus on nation rised, and therefore less useful for comparisons than exam- states. Basic historical narratives about the formation of ples from the history of nation-state archaeology (e.g. Kohl the discipline, as well as critical deconstruction of histori- and Fawcett 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Dyeing Sutton Hoo Nordic Blonde: an Interpretation of Swedish Influences on the East Anglian Gravesite
    DYEING SUTTON HOO NORDIC BLONDE: AN INTERPRETATION OF SWEDISH INFLUENCES ON THE EAST ANGLIAN GRAVESITE Casandra Vasu A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2008 Committee: Andrew Hershberger, Advisor Charles E. Kanwischer © 2008 Casandra Vasu All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew Hershberger, Advisor Nearly seventy years have passed since the series of tumuli surrounding Edith Pretty’s estate at Sutton Hoo in Eastern Suffolk, England were first excavated, and the site, particularly the magnificent ship-burial and its associated pieces located in Mound 1, remains enigmatic to archaeologists and historians. Dated to approximately the early seventh century, the Sutton Hoo entombment retains its importance by illuminating a period of English history that straddles both myth and historical documentation. The burial also exists in a multicultural context, an era when Scandinavian influences factored heavily upon society in the British Isles, predominantly in the areas of art, religion and literature. Literary works such as the Old English epic of Beowulf, a tale of a Geatish hero and his Danish and Swedish counterparts, offer insight into the cultural background of the custom of ship-burial and the various accoutrements of Norse warrior society. Beowulf may hold an even more specific affinity with Sutton Hoo, in that a character from the tale, Weohstan, is considered to be an ancestor of the man commemorated in the ship- burial in Mound 1. Weohstan, whose allegiance lay with the Geats, was nonetheless a member of the Wægmunding clan, distant relations to the Swedish Scylfing dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Fornvännen 1949
    RUNINSKRIFTEN FRÅN ROES EN GOTLÄNDSK BILDRISTARES SIGNATUR Av Oskar Lundberg Den lilla stenhällen från Roes i Grötlingbo sn på Gotland har, utom en för övrigt rätt nonchalant utförd hästbild, endast att uppvisa några få runor. Den har dock varit föremål för ej så litet utläggningar. En som brytt sin hjärna med densamma kallar den t. o. m. för en av de till tolkningen besvärligaste av de gotländska runstenarna (fig. 1 o. 2). En början gjordes av Sophus Bugge,1 som först kommenterar bilden och med skäl finner hästsvansen »meget bred og busket». Det djupa streck, som går tvärs över hästkroppen från rygg till buk, menar han sig kunna se som »Hestens Brystrem». Han har också i det material, som stod honom till buds, fotografier och ett pappersavtryck, märkt de fina och grunda linjer, som bilda ett kors på hästmanken. »Skraastregen», säger han, »muligens en Tömme.» I den svårtydda bilden över hästen förmodar han »en Fugl vendt i samme Retning som Hesten». Senare ha andra i denna bild, som är omöjlig att med någon säkerhet tolka, sett ett misslyckat försök till hästbild eller en mansfigur. Inskriftens början är efter Bugge och allt fortfarande att läsa som lupin. I de två första runorna såg han ack. sg. av en motsvarighet till fvn. jör 'häst' och i ]>in ordet för 'denne', »d. e, den her afbildede Hest». Den därpå följande samstava run­ gruppen med u, d och R (i oviss ordning) tolkar han som per­ sonnamnet *Uddr, motsvarande fvn. Oddr och fsv. Od(der) och Ud(der) (Lundgren-Brate). De sista runorna, som lästes rd och utfylldes r[ai]d, tyddes av Bugge som 'red (in)', om hästens 1 Sophus Bugge, En nylunden Gotländsk Runesten, Sv.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    xvllt Acbnoledgennts Wolfe. My obligations in respect of illustrations are in gencral ex- pressed where the plates, text figures, and maps are listed. I am much indebted to the following for the use of copyrighr material: Columbia University Press for F. J. Tschan's translatir:n of The History oJ the Archbkhops of Hamburg-Bremen, I9J9; the Medieval Academy of America for the Cross and Sherbowitz-\Tetzor trans- lation of The Russian Primary Chronicle, I9J3; the late Professor G. N. - Garmonsway for his translation of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle; anci the late ProfeSsor A. H. Smith for his place-name map. Introduction Also, no one can write a general history of the Vikings without levying a viking-style tribute on other men's riches. I am conscious ,T of my many exactions, and trust that every bibliographical refercnce IHE SUBIECT OF THIS BOOK IS THE VIKING REAL}IS, will be held indicative of eratitude and esteem. Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, their emergence and develop- ment, civilization and culture, and their many-sided achievement University College GWYN JONES at home and abroad. It is an extensive field to survey. For even Cardiff when we set aside the almost trackless millennia of my opening pages, there remain a thousand years ofhistory to be charted in an For timely assistance during the revision of my Hktor"y I stand, as e vcr, area of Norse activity extending frorn the North Cape and White in debt to many. Of institutions I would mention the American- Sea to the Pillars of Hercules, from Newfoundland and Baffin Island Scandinavian Foundation, the Archaeological Institute ofAmerica, the to the Volga Bend and Byzandum.
    [Show full text]
  • Beowulfkvädet
    Diktverket Beowulf, som utspelar sig i Danmark och Sverige under 500-talet e. Kr, tillhör världslitteraturen. Det har bevarats på fornengelska i ett manuskript i Eng- land från omkring år 1000 och anses allmänt ha komponerats skriftligt av en kristen Bo Grä Bo fornengelsk diktare som en i huvudsak fiktiv berättelse. När frågan om bakgrunden till detta unika epos här för första gången utsätts för en ingående kritisk granskning ur ett samlat arkeologiskt, historiskt och språkligt perspektiv, framstår denna upp- fattning som ohållbar. Fram träder en ursprunglig muntlig hednisk dikttradition med Beowulfkvädet bakgrund i en faktisk verklighet på Själland och Gotland och i viss mån i Uppland S strax före, under och efter den stora klimatkatastrofen åren 536–550, folkvandrings- lu Den nordiska bakgrunden tidens slut. Beowulfkvädet har av allt att döma överförts som ett enhetligt muntligt N diktverk från östra Sverige till East Anglia omkring år 600 för att sedan under viss d kristen bearbetning traderas i skilda fornengelska dialektområden och till slut för- • evigas på manuskript på västsaxisk dialekt i södra England. Beowulfkvädet Bo Gräslund är professor emeritus i arkeologi vid Uppsala universitet. Bo Gräslund Distribution: eddy.se ab e-post: [email protected] ISSN 0065-0897 Box 1310, 621 24 Visby. Telefon: 0498-25 39 00 ISSN 1100-6358 http://kgaa.bokorder.se ISBN 978-91-87403-27-9 1 ACTA ACADEMIAE REGIAE GUSTAVI ADOLPHI 149 OPIA 64 2 sid2 3 ACTA ACADEMIAE REGIAE GUSTAVI ADOLPHI CXLIX OPIA 64 BO GRÄSLUND Beowulfkvädet Den nordiska bakgrunden UPPSALA 2018 4 Abstract Bo Gräslund, Beowulfkvädet. Den nordiska bakgrunden (Beowulf: The Scandinavian back- ground).
    [Show full text]