DOCSLIB.ORG

Crete Basic Features of Cretan History and Reports on the Character of the People, in Support of the Study of the Epistle to Titus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Crete Basic Features of Cretan History and Reports on the Character of the People, in Support of the Study of the Epistle to Titus Crete is an island which forms a southern directions for the farther improvement of his code boundary to the Aegean Sea, and lies southeast of of laws; though this be fable, it probably states a Greece. Crete is 156 miles long, seven to thirty- fact in disguise. Minos probably revised his laws five miles wide, and 3,189 square miles in area. It every ninth year, and, to procure due respect and is the fifth largest island in the Mediterranean Sea obedience to them, told the people that he received (after Sicily, Sardinia, Cyprus, and Corsica), and is these improvements from Jupiter himself. This on the spine of an undersea mountain range was customary with ancient legislators who had to thought to have formed at one time a land bridge deal with an ignorant and gross people, and has between the Greek Peloponnesian peninsula and been practised from the days of Minos to those of southern Turkey. In ancient times, Crete was the Mohammed. main stepping stone (by sea) between Greece and According to ancient authors, Crete was originally Africa, and between Asia Minor and Africa. The peopled from Palestine. That part of Palestine Philistines may have migrated to Palestine from which lies on the Mediterranean was by the Arabs Greece, having been located on Crete for a time in called Keritha, and by the Syrians, Creth; and the the ancient past. Hebrews called its inhabitants Kerethi or Kerethim Homer attributes to this island only ninety cities, which the Septuagint have translated krhta~. In ennhkonta polhev, yet In other places he gives Ezekiel 25:16, we find “I will cut off the it the epithet of eJkatompoliv, hundred cities. Cherethims”, translated by the Septuagint kai And this number it is generally allowed to have exoloqreusw krhtav, I will destroy the had originally; but we must not let the term city Cretans; and Zephaniah 2:5: “Woe unto the deceive us, as in ancient times places were thus inhabitants of the seacoast, the nation of the named which would rate with villages or hamlets Cherethites, Septuagint, “the sojourners of the 1 only in these modern times. Cretans.” That these prophets do not speak of the island of Crete is plain from their joining the Few places in antiquity have been more celebrated Kerethim with the Pelishtim as one and the same than Crete: it was not only famous for its hundred people. “Thus saith the Lord God, Behold I will cities, but for the arrival of Europa on a bull, or in stretch out my hand upon the Philistines, and will the ship Taurus, from Phoenicia; for the Labyrinth, cut off the Cherethims, and destroy the remnant of the work of Daedalus; for the destruction of the the seacoast;” Ezekiel 25:16. “Woe unto the Minotaur, by Theseus; for Mount Ida, where inhabitants of the seacoasts, the nation of the Jupiter was preserved 254 from the jealousy of his Cherethites; the word of the Lord is against you: O father Saturn; for Jupiter’s sepulchre; and above Canaan, the land of the Philistines, I will even all, for its king, Minos, and the laws which he destroy thee;” Zephaniah 2:5. gave to his people; the most pure, wholesome, and Accordingly it appears that the Kerethim were a equal, of which antiquity can boast. part of the Philistines. The Kerethim in Palestine Their lawgiver, Minos, is said by Homer to have were noted for archery; and we find that some of held a conference every ninth year with Jupiter, them were employed by David as his life guards, 2 from whom he is reported to have received Samuel 8:18; 15:18; 20:23; 1 Kings 1:38; 1 Chronicles 18:17; in all which places they are called, in our translation, Cherethites. 1 This and several of the following paragraphs are Idomeneus, who assisted Agamemnon in the attributable to Clarke, Adam, “New Testament … Trojan war, was the last king of Crete. He left the Commentary and Critical Notes”. Crete 2 regency of the island to his adopted son Leucus, Crete is centrally located, but very little was who, in the absence of the king, usurped the known of its history prior to the Greek period. It empire; the usurper was however soon expelled, was not until the archaeological expeditions of Sir and Crete became one of the most celebrated Arthur Evans in the late 19th Century that some of republics in antiquity. The Romans at last, under the true facts of ancient Cretan history became Quintus Metellus, after an immense expenditure of known. Evans was an out-of-work millionaire in blood and treasure, succeeded in subduing the England, so he took a position as the curator of the island, on which he abolished the laws of Minos, Ashmolean Museum of Oxford University in and introduced the code of Numa Pompilius. Oxford, England. He was an avid amateur Crete, with the small kingdom of Cyrene, became archaeologist, but he was to achieve a reputation a Roman province; this was at first governed by which placed him among the most professional. proconsul, next by a quaestor and assistant, and Evans was also a numismatist, and he heard about lastly by a consul. Constantine the Great, in the some very interesting signet rings which had new division he made of the provinces of the supposedly been left on the island of Crete by empire, separated Crete from Cyrene, and left it, some ancient Egyptians. Taking an extended with Africa and Illyria, to his third son Constans. vacation from the museum, he sailed his personal In the ninth century, in the reign of Michael II., it yacht to Crete in 1894. He arrived in the harbor at was attacked and conquered by the Saracens. Knossos in that year, and he began an About 965, the Emperor Nicephorus Phocas, in the archaeological dig at a place nearby called the following century, defeated and expelled the Kephala site. On the very first day of digging, he Saracens, and reunited the island to the empire, uncovered the top of a bronze age palace. He after it had been under the power of the infidels knew that he had found something, but the upwards of 100 years. It remained with the empire property didn't belong to him; so he covered up the until the time of Baldwin, earl of Flanders, who, hole and began negotiations with the Greek being raised to the throne, rewarded the services of government on Crete to purchase the site. Boniface, marquis of Montferrat, by making him The place that Evans bought was the site of king of Thessalonica, and adding to it the island of ancient Knossos; and the palace he had found was Crete. Baldwin, preferring a sum of gold to the that of King Minos, who had, up until that time, government of the island, sold it to the Venetians, been thought of only as a legend. Evans called the A. D. 1194, under whose government it was called civilization of King Minos the Minoan Candia, from the Arabic (Arabic) Kandak, a civilization. This civilization flourished from fortification, the name which the Saracens gave to early times up until about 1400 B.C., and its the metropolis which they had built and strongly discovery has been invaluable to the study of fortified. Greek and European history and languages, In 1645, in the midst of a peace, it was attacked by especially those of the eastern Mediterranean area. the Turks with a fleet of 400 sail, which had on The Minoan culture is distinguished by the board an army of 60,000 men, under the command originality and high development of its art and of four pashas, to oppose whom the whole island architecture. In fact, the Minoan culture is could only muster 3,500 infantry, and a small considered to be a forerunner of the Mycenaean number of cavalry; yet with these they held out civilization of ancient Greece. against a numerous and continually recruited Many examples of pictographic script were found army, disputing every inch of ground, so that the at the palace site; and two basic forms were whole Ottoman power was employed for nearly identified, labeled Minoan Linear A and Linear B. thirty years before they got the entire dominion of The work of decipherment began in the 1930's, but the island. In this long campaign against this brave it was not until 1953 that the Linear B script people the Turks lost about 200,000 men! [End of puzzle was solved, by two men named Ventris and Clarke notes. wd] Chadwick. They determined that Linear B is an Crete 3 archaic form of early Greek. Linear A is still ON CRETE'S INTERNAL STRIFE AND CIVIL WARS under examination. [II, 429ff], "The city of Lyttus met with an Sir Arthur Evans was recognized with many irremediable disaster. Knossians and Gortynians honors: he was elected a Fellow of the Royal had subjected the whole island, except for Lyttus Society of Archaeologists; he was knighted in (about 225 B.C.). Since Lyttus would not 1911; he was named president of the Society of surrender to them, they declared war against it. At Antiquaries from 1914 to 1919. He died at Oxford first, all the Cretans took part in the war against in 1941. the Lyttans; but jealousy sprang up from some trifling cause, as is common with the Cretans. The Minoan civilization was destroyed in about Several cities went over to the aid of Lyttus.
Recommended publications
  • The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth)

    The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth)

    The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth) Uranus (Heaven) Oceanus = Tethys Iapetus (Titan) = Clymene Themis Atlas Menoetius Prometheus Epimetheus = Pandora Prometheus • “Prometheus made humans out of earth and water, and he also gave them fire…” (Apollodorus Library 1.7.1) • … “and scatter-brained Epimetheus from the first was a mischief to men who eat bread; for it was he who first took of Zeus the woman, the maiden whom he had formed” (Hesiod Theogony ca. 509) Prometheus and Zeus • Zeus concealed the secret of life • Trick of the meat and fat • Zeus concealed fire • Prometheus stole it and gave it to man • Freidrich H. Fuger, 1751 - 1818 • Zeus ordered the creation of Pandora • Zeus chained Prometheus to a mountain • The accounts here are many and confused Maxfield Parish Prometheus 1919 Prometheus Chained Dirck van Baburen 1594 - 1624 Prometheus Nicolas-Sébastien Adam 1705 - 1778 Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus • Novel by Mary Shelly • First published in 1818. • The first true Science Fiction novel • Victor Frankenstein is Prometheus • As with the story of Prometheus, the novel asks about cause and effect, and about responsibility. • Is man accountable for his creations? • Is God? • Are there moral, ethical constraints on man’s creative urges? Mary Shelly • “I saw the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together. I saw the hideous phantasm of a man stretched out, and then, on the working of some powerful engine, show signs of life, and stir with an uneasy, half vital motion. Frightful must it be; for supremely frightful would be the effect of any human endeavour to mock the stupendous mechanism of the Creator of the world” (Introduction to the 1831 edition) Did I request thee, from my clay To mould me man? Did I solicit thee From darkness to promote me? John Milton, Paradise Lost 10.
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
  • The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen

    The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen

    Breakthrough and Concealment: The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Howard Chen All rights reserved ABSTRACT Breakthrough and Concealment: The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen This dissertation analyzes the three main protagonists of Lucan’s Bellum Civile through their attempts to utilize, resist, or match a pattern of action which I call the “formula.” Most evident in Caesar, the formula is a cycle of alternating states of energy that allows him to gain a decisive edge over his opponents by granting him the ability of perpetual regeneration. However, a similar dynamic is also found in rivers, which thus prove to be formidable adversaries of Caesar in their own right. Although neither Pompey nor Cato is able to draw on the Caesarian formula successfully, Lucan eventually associates them with the river-derived variant, thus granting them a measure of resistance (if only in the non-physical realm). By tracing the development of the formula throughout the epic, the dissertation provides a deeper understanding of the importance of natural forces in Lucan’s poem as well as the presence of an underlying drive that unites its fractured world. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ vi Introduction ......................................................................................................................
  • The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology (2007)

    The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology (2007)

    P1: JzG 9780521845205pre CUFX147/Woodard 978 0521845205 Printer: cupusbw July 28, 2007 1:25 The Cambridge Companion to GREEK MYTHOLOGY S The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology presents a comprehensive and integrated treatment of ancient Greek mythic tradition. Divided into three sections, the work consists of sixteen original articles authored by an ensemble of some of the world’s most distinguished scholars of classical mythology. Part I provides readers with an examination of the forms and uses of myth in Greek oral and written literature from the epic poetry of the eighth century BC to the mythographic catalogs of the early centuries AD. Part II looks at the relationship between myth, religion, art, and politics among the Greeks and at the Roman appropriation of Greek mythic tradition. The reception of Greek myth from the Middle Ages to modernity, in literature, feminist scholarship, and cinema, rounds out the work in Part III. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology is a unique resource that will be of interest and value not only to undergraduate and graduate students and professional scholars, but also to anyone interested in the myths of the ancient Greeks and their impact on western tradition. Roger D. Woodard is the Andrew V.V.Raymond Professor of the Clas- sics and Professor of Linguistics at the University of Buffalo (The State University of New York).He has taught in the United States and Europe and is the author of a number of books on myth and ancient civiliza- tion, most recently Indo-European Sacred Space: Vedic and Roman Cult. Dr.
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)

    Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)

    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
  • Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology

    Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology

    The Ruins of Paradise: Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology by Matthew M. Newman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Richard Janko, Chair Professor Sara L. Ahbel-Rappe Professor Gary M. Beckman Associate Professor Benjamin W. Fortson Professor Ruth S. Scodel Bind us in time, O Seasons clear, and awe. O minstrel galleons of Carib fire, Bequeath us to no earthly shore until Is answered in the vortex of our grave The seal’s wide spindrift gaze toward paradise. (from Hart Crane’s Voyages, II) For Mom and Dad ii Acknowledgments I fear that what follows this preface will appear quite like one of the disorderly monsters it investigates. But should you find anything in this work compelling on account of its being lucid, know that I am not responsible. Not long ago, you see, I was brought up on charges of obscurantisme, although the only “terroristic” aspects of it were self- directed—“Vous avez mal compris; vous êtes idiot.”1 But I’ve been rehabilitated, or perhaps, like Aphrodite in Iliad 5 (if you buy my reading), habilitated for the first time, to the joys of clearer prose. My committee is responsible for this, especially my chair Richard Janko and he who first intervened, Benjamin Fortson. I thank them. If something in here should appear refined, again this is likely owing to the good taste of my committee. And if something should appear peculiarly sensitive, empathic even, then it was the humanity of my committee that enabled, or at least amplified, this, too.
  • Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman D'alexandre

    Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman D'alexandre

    Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman d’Alexandre Paul Henri Rogers A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Romance Languages (French) Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Dr. Edward D. Montgomery Dr. Frank A. Domínguez Dr. Edward D. Kennedy Dr. Hassan Melehy Dr. Monica P. Rector © 2008 Paul Henri Rogers ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii Abstract Paul Henri Rogers Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman d’Alexandre Under the direction of Dr. Edward D. Montgomery In the Roman d’Alexandre , Alexandre de Paris generates new myth by depicting Alexander the Great as willfully seeking to inscribe himself and his deeds within the extant mythical tradition, and as deliberately rivaling the divine authority. The contemporary literary tradition based on Quintus Curtius’s Gesta Alexandri Magni of which Alexandre de Paris may have been aware eliminates many of the marvelous episodes of the king’s life but focuses instead on Alexander’s conquests and drive to compete with the gods’ accomplishments. The depiction of his premature death within this work and the Roman raises the question of whether or not an individual can actively seek deification. Heroic figures are at the origin of divinity and myth, and the Roman d’Alexandre portrays Alexander as an essentially very human character who is nevertheless dispossessed of the powerful attributes normally associated with heroic protagonists.
  • Lucan's Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulf

    Lucan's Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulf

    Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2014 Reading Committee: Catherine Connors, Chair Alain Gowing Stephen Hinds Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics © Copyright 2014 Laura Zientek University of Washington Abstract Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Catherine Connors Department of Classics This dissertation is an analysis of the role of landscape and the natural world in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. I investigate digressions and excurses on mountains, rivers, and certain myths associated aetiologically with the land, and demonstrate how Stoic physics and cosmology – in particular the concepts of cosmic (dis)order, collapse, and conflagration – play a role in the way Lucan writes about the landscape in the context of a civil war poem. Building on previous analyses of the Bellum Civile that provide background on its literary context (Ahl, 1976), on Lucan’s poetic technique (Masters, 1992), and on landscape in Roman literature (Spencer, 2010), I approach Lucan’s depiction of the natural world by focusing on the mutual effect of humanity and landscape on each other. Thus, hardships posed by the land against characters like Caesar and Cato, gloomy and threatening atmospheres, and dangerous or unusual weather phenomena all have places in my study. I also explore how Lucan’s landscapes engage with the tropes of the locus amoenus or horridus (Schiesaro, 2006) and elements of the sublime (Day, 2013).
  • Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G

    Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G

    Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary ILDENHARD INGO GILDENHARD AND JOHN HENDERSON A dead boy (Pallas) and the death of a girl (Camilla) loom over the opening and the closing part of the eleventh book of the Aeneid. Following the savage slaughter in Aeneid 10, the AND book opens in a mournful mood as the warring parti es revisit yesterday’s killing fi elds to att end to their dead. One casualty in parti cular commands att enti on: Aeneas’ protégé H Pallas, killed and despoiled by Turnus in the previous book. His death plunges his father ENDERSON Evander and his surrogate father Aeneas into heart-rending despair – and helps set up the foundati onal act of sacrifi cial brutality that caps the poem, when Aeneas seeks to avenge Pallas by slaying Turnus in wrathful fury. Turnus’ departure from the living is prefi gured by that of his ally Camilla, a maiden schooled in the marti al arts, who sets the mold for warrior princesses such as Xena and Wonder Woman. In the fi nal third of Aeneid 11, she wreaks havoc not just on the batt lefi eld but on gender stereotypes and the conventi ons of the epic genre, before she too succumbs to a premature death. In the porti ons of the book selected for discussion here, Virgil off ers some of his most emoti ve (and disturbing) meditati ons on the tragic nature of human existence – but also knows how to lighten the mood with a bit of drag.
  • A. the Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC)

    A. the Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC)

    www.HistoryAtOurHouse.Com Junior High Class Notes III. The Decline and Fall of Greece (431-146 BC) A. The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC) 1. The main reasons Sparta and Athens went to war were that they had opposite forms of government and that they were rivals for the leadership of Greece. 2. Even though they had agreed to the “Thirty Years Peace,” the war began in 431 BC when Athens agreed to help its ally Corcyra defend itself against Corinth, an ally of Sparta. Corinth claimed this broke the terms of the peace, and Sparta's allies clamored for war. 3. This war was made especially famous by the writing of one of the first great historians, named Thucydides. His History of the Peloponnesian War became a celebrated example of how to write history and had been studied by historians ever since. 4. In our time, however, the details of the war discussed by Thucydides cannot concern us if we are not professional historians. What matters is its impact on Greece. 5. The first key impact of the war was the defeat of Athens by Sparta, and its effect on Athenian democracy. As Athens started to lose, the aristocrats of Athens temporarily took charge. Worse, at the end, the Spartans chose thirty of them to be the “Thirty Tyrants” to force the city to follow Sparta’s lead. 6. When the democrats of Athens took over again, they sought to punish anyone connected to the tyrants. The philosopher Socrates was among those critical of democracy, and he was persecuted.
  • An Apology of Euripides: Defending the Poets

    An Apology of Euripides: Defending the Poets

    [Expositions 11.1 (2017) 118–137] Expositions (online) ISSN: 1747–5376 An Apology of Euripides: Defending the Poets MARLENE K. SOKOLON Concordia University One of the main prosecutors of Socrates on charges of impiety and corruption in 399 B.C.E. was the poet Miletus. In Plato’s version of his Apology (22b), Socrates defends himself by pointing out that poets are merely inspired and their audiences are better at explaining their poems.1 This critique of poetry is found and developed across Plato’s corpus, especially in the Republic (604b– 608d) where Socrates ends the ancient quarrel by exiling the poets from the city and philosophic education. This banishment, however, unleashed a new quarrel as to the meaning of Socrates’ critique of poetry, especially in light of his generous use of poetic elements in Plato’s dialogues. Generally, this debate has examined whether Socrates’ critique is ironic from the philosopher’s perspective. In contrast, this analysis takes up Socrates’ explicit challenge in the Republic (607e) for a defender (prostatēs) to give apology of poetry demonstrating that it is not simply pleasant but beneficial to regimes and human life. Offering two of Euripides’ plays in defense—Suppliant Women and Ion—the article investigates Euripides’ poetic contribution to understanding two enduring questions of political philosophy: what is the best regime; and what is the role of myth in political origin. Importantly, Euripides provides a serious account of such questions and reveals that a poetic education may be not only beneficial, but essential in any democratic regime. Socrates’ Critique of the Poets In Plato’s Apology, Socrates’ critique of the poets appears in the context of his defense against his old accusers.
  • Conflict in the Peloponnese

    Conflict in the Peloponnese

    CONFLICT IN THE PELOPONNESE Social, Military and Intellectual Proceedings of the 2nd CSPS PG and Early Career Conference, University of Nottingham 22-24 March 2013 edited by Vasiliki BROUMA Kendell HEYDON CSPS Online Publications 4 2018 Published by the Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies (CSPS), School of Humanities, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. © Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies and individual authors ISBN 978-0-9576620-2-5 This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without express permission of the authors and the publisher of this volume. Furthermore, for any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/csps TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. i THE FAMILY AS THE INTERNAL ENEMY OF THE SPARTAN STATE ........................................ 1-23 Maciej Daszuta COMMEMORATING THE WAR DEAD IN ANCIENT SPARTA THE GYMNOPAIDIAI AND THE BATTLE OF HYSIAI .............................................................. 24-39 Elena Franchi PHILOTIMIA AND PHILONIKIA AT SPARTA ......................................................................... 40-69 Michele Lucchesi SLAVERY AS A POLITICAL PROBLEM DURING THE PELOPONESSIAN WARS ..................... 70-85 Bernat Montoya Rubio TYRTAEUS: THE SPARTAN POET FROM ATHENS SHIFTING IDENTITIES AS RHETORICAL STRATEGY IN LYCURGUS’ AGAINST LEOCRATES ................................................................................ 86-102 Eveline van Hilten-Rutten THE INFLUENCE OF THE KARNEIA ON WARFARE ..........................................................