Directive Speech Act Analysis on the Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’ of the Holy Father Francis on Care for Our Common Home
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS ON THE ENCYCLICAL LETTER LAUDATO SI’ OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ON CARE FOR OUR COMMON HOME A THESIS Presented as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Magister Humaniora (M.Hum) Degree In English Language Studies by Maxymilianus Soter Mite Kombong Student number: 156332028 THE GRADUATE PROGRAM OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2017 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS ON THE ENCYCLICAL LETTER LAUDATO SI’ OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ON CARE FOR OUR COMMON HOME A THESIS Presented as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Magister Humaniora (M.Hum) Degree In English Language Studies by Maxymilianus Soter Mite Kombong Student number: 156332028 THE GRADUATE PROGRAM OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2017 i PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI A THESIS DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS ON "TIJE ENCYCLICAL LETTER LAADATO SI' OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ON CARE FOR OAR COMMON HOME by Maxymilianus Soter Mite Kombong 156332028 Approved by Yogyakart a, 14 July 2017 fA {br,/( Thesis Advisor Dr. B.B. Dwiiatmoko.M.A. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI A THESIS DIRECTIVESSPEECHACTANALYSISoNTLf.,ENCYCLICALLETTER ON CARE FOR OUR I,,,IUDATO SI, OF THE HOLY FATHER FMNCIS COMMON HOME Presented bY Maxymilianus Sotei Mite Kombong Student Number: 156332028 Defended before the Thesis Committee and Declared AccePtable THESIS COMMITTEE Chairperson : Dr. J. Bismoko h*\ fb fb,-,f Secretary : Dr. B.B. Dwijatmoko, M.A Members : 1. Dr. Fr.B. AliP, M.Pd, M.A 2.Dr. E. Sunarto, M.Hum Yogyakarta, 24 JttlY 20 17 11r PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI STATEMENTS OF WORK'S ORIGINALITY This is to certifi that all ideas, phrases, sentences, unless otherwise stated, are the ideas, phrases and sentences of the thesis writer. The writer understands the full consequences including degree cancellation if he took somebody else's ideas, phrases and sentences without proper references. Yogyakarta, 14 July 20t7 Maxymilianus Soter Mite Kombong lv PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI LEMBAR PER}IYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS Yang bertandatangan di bawah ini, saya mahasiswa Universitas Sanata Dharma: NAMA : Maxymilianus Soter Mite Kombong NIM :15632028 Demi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, memberikan kepada Perpustakaan Univeristas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul: Directive Speech Act Analysis on the Encyclical Letter Laudato Si ' of the Holy Father Francis on Care for Our Common Home beserta peragkat yang diperlukan (bila ada). Dengan demikian, saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan, mengalihkan dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam bentuk pangkalan data, mendistribusikannya di internet atau media lain untuk kepentingan akademis tanpa perlu meminta ijin maupun memberikan royalty kepada saya selama tetap mencntumkan nama saya sebagai penulis. Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya. Dibuat di Yogyakarta Pada tanggal 14 JuJi20l7 iunus So\"r Mite Kombong PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ACKOWLEDGEMENTS Praise to the Lord, the Almighty Father, Son and Holy Spirit with all my deepest thanks for the grace, health, knowledge, oppurtinity and spirit in completing this thesis. My deepest praise goes also to Holy Mary Mother of God for the miraculous appearances in my life. My deepest gratitude is addressed for my thesis advisor, Dr. B.B. Dwijatmoko, M.A for his advices, supports, and compassions. Great thanks also go to Dr. J. Bismoko and Dr. E. Sunarto, M.Hum as my thesis reviewers and Dr. Fr. B. Alip, M.Pd, M.A as the thesis examiner, for the great inputs and suggestions. I dedicate this thesis for my beloved family, Daniel Mite, S.Pd and Adriana Paranda, S.Ag and my brothers and sister. Their loves contribute greatly in completing my thesis. I thank for the supports, motivations and encouragements. Many thanks are also addressed to all lectures and staffs of Magister Program English Language Studies Sanata Dharma. I thank also to my friends, Magister Program ELS batch 2015 for this 2 years of friendship and togetherness. My deepest gratitude is addressed also to my friends, Kombongan Pascatorayaindejogja, for the supports and friendship. Maxymilianus Soter Mite Kombong vi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI MOTTO NON SCHOLAE SED VITAE DISCIMUS RELIGIO OMNIUM SCIENTIARUM ANIMA vii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PAGE OF DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my beloved family viii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI TABLE OF CONTENTS DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS ON THE ENCYCLICAL LETTER LAUDATO SI’ OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ON CARE FOR OUR COMMON HOME ................................................................................................... i A THESIS ............................................................................................................... ii DIRECTIVES SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS ON THE ENCYCLICAL LETTER LAUDATO SI’ OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ON CARE FOR OUR COMMON HOME ................................................................................................. iii STATEMENTS OF WORK‟S ORIGINALITY .................................................... iv LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN ....................................................... v ACKOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................... vi MOTTO ................................................................................................................ vii PAGE OF DEDICATION.................................................................................... viii TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................... xi ABSTRAK ............................................................................................................ xii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Background of the Study ................................................................................... 1 1.2 Research Questions ........................................................................................... 7 1.3 Research Objectives .......................................................................................... 7 1.4 Research Benefits .............................................................................................. 9 CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE ......................................................... 10 2.1 Review of Related Literature .......................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Pragmatics and Scope of Pragmatics .................................................... 10 2.1.2 Theory of Context ................................................................................. 13 2.1.3 Speech Acts Theory .............................................................................. 15 2.2.4 Directive Speech Acts ........................................................................... 18 2.2.5 Aspects of Modality in Directive Speech Acts ..................................... 21 2.1.6 Direct Speech Acts VS Indirect Speech Acts ....................................... 22 2.1.7 Language and Identity ........................................................................... 26 2.1.8 The Mind of Holy Father Francis ......................................................... 28 ix PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI x 2.2 Review of Related Studies .............................................................................. 29 2.3 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................... 32 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ................................................... 34 3.1 Type of Study .................................................................................................. 34 3.2 Object of the Study .......................................................................................... 34 3.3 Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 35 CHAPTER 4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION ....................................................... 38 4.1 The Context of the Letter ................................................................................ 38 4.2. The Proportion of Directives Speech Acts ..................................................... 41 4.2.1 The Proportion of Direct Directives Speech Acts ................................. 42 4.2.2 The Proportion of Indirect Directive Speech Acts ................................ 49 4.3 The Delivery of Directive Speech Acts ........................................................... 60 4.3.1 Characteristics of Direct Directives Speech Acts ................................. 61 4.3.1.1 Characteristics of Direct Requests ................................................ 61 4.3.1.2 Characteristics of Direct Suggestions ........................................... 63 4.3.2 Characteristics of Indirect Speech Acts ................................................ 65 4.3.2.1 Characteristics of Indirect Commands .......................................... 65 4.3.2.2 Characteristics of Indirect Requests .............................................. 66