The Rhesus Factor and Disease Prevention
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Fetal Center SPRING 2019 JOURNAL in This Issue
The Fetal Center SPRING 2019 JOURNAL In This Issue FEATURES: TAKING THE RESEARCH LONG VIEW TOWARD PREVENTION OF RHESUS DISEASE 06 A New Clinical Trial: Umbilical Cord Blood Mononuclear Cells for Hypoxic Neurologic Injury 01 Leaders in Innovation: Rhesus Disease in Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Diagnosis and Treatment NEWS OF NOTE 04 A Miracle Baby for the Pinedas 08 The Fetal Center Welcomes New Recruits 09 NAFTNet Leadership Contact Us THE FETAL CENTER AT CHILDREN’S MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL UT Physicians Professional Building 6410 Fannin, Suite 210 Houston, TX 77030 Phone: 832.325.7288 Fax: 713.383.1464 Email: [email protected] Located within the Texas Medical Center, The Fetal Center is affiliated with Children’s ★FETAL Memorial Hermann Hospital, McGovern Medical NR School at UTHealth, and UT Physicians. To view The Fetal Center’s online resources, visit childrens.memorialhermann.org/thefetalcenter. FEATURE Leaders in Innovation: Rhesus Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Rhesus (Rh) disease, also known as Reproductive Sciences and the department of Rh-induced hemolytic disease of the Pediatric Surgery at McGovern Medical School at UTHealth. “The antibodies don’t usually cause fetus and newborn (HDFN), rhesus problems during a first pregnancy, because the baby alloimmunization or erythroblastosis may be born before the level of antibodies is high enough to have an effect. Rh antibodies are more fetalis, is relatively rare, occurring in likely to cause problems in second or later pregnan- about 2.5 out of every 100,000 live cies if the baby is Rh positive. Rh antibodies cross the placenta and attack the baby’s red blood cells, births in countries with well-established causing hemolytic anemia in the baby and leading to healthcare infrastructures. -
Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn
Intensive Care Nursery House Staff Manual Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn INTRODUCTION and DEFINITION: Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn (HDN), also known as erythroblastosis fetalis, isoimmunization, or blood group incompatibility, occurs when fetal red blood cells (RBCs), which possess an antigen that the mother lacks, cross the placenta into the maternal circulation, where they stimulate antibody production. The antibodies return to the fetal circulation and result in RBC destruction. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS of hemolytic anemia in a newborn infant: -Isoimmunization -RBC enzyme disorders (e.g., G6PD, pyruvate kinase deficiency) -Hemoglobin synthesis disorders (e.g., alpha-thalassemias) -RBC membrane abnormalities (e.g., hereditary spherocytosis, elliptocytosis) -Hemangiomas (Kasabach Merritt syndrome) -Acquired conditions, such as sepsis, infections with TORCH or Parvovirus B19 (anemia due to RBC aplasia) and hemolysis secondary to drugs. ISOIMMUNIZATION A. Rh disease (Rh = Rhesus factor) (1) Genetics: Rh positive (+) denotes presence of D antigen. The number of antigenic sites on RBCs varies with genotype. Prevalence of genotype varies with the population. Rh negative (d/d) individuals comprise 15% of Caucasians, 5.5% of African Americans, and <1% of Asians. A sensitized Rh negative mother produces anti-Rh IgG antibodies that cross the placenta. Risk factors for antibody production include 2nd (or later) pregnancies*, maternal toxemia, paternal zygosity (D/D rather than D/d), feto-maternal compatibility in ABO system and antigen load. (2) Clinical presentation of HDN varies from mild jaundice and anemia to hydrops fetalis (with ascites, pleural and pericardial effusions). Because the placenta clears bilirubin, the chief risk to the fetus is anemia. Extramedullary hematopoiesis (due to anemia) results in hepatosplenomegaly. -
Role of Infection and Immunity in Bovine Perinatal Mortality: Part 2
animals Review Role of Infection and Immunity in Bovine Perinatal Mortality: Part 2. Fetomaternal Response to Infection and Novel Diagnostic Perspectives Paulina Jawor 1,* , John F. Mee 2 and Tadeusz Stefaniak 1 1 Department of Immunology, Pathophysiology and Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] 2 Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc, Moorepark Research Centre, P61 P302 Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Bovine perinatal mortality (death of the fetus or calf before, during, or within 48 h of calving at full term (≥260 days) may be caused by noninfectious and infectious causes. Although infectious causes of fetal mortality are diagnosed less frequently, infection in utero may also compromise the development of the fetus without causing death. This review presents fetomaternal responses to infection and the changes which can be observed in such cases. Response to infection, especially the concentration of immunoglobulins and some acute-phase proteins, may be used for diagnostic purposes. Some changes in internal organs may also be used as an indicator of infection in utero. However, in all cases (except pathogen-specific antibody response) non-pathogen-specific responses do not aid in pathogen-specific diagnosis of the cause of calf death. But, nonspecific markers of in utero infection may allow us to assign the cause of fetal mortality to infection and thus Citation: Jawor, P.; Mee, J.F.; increase our overall diagnosis rate, particularly in cases of the “unexplained stillbirth”. Stefaniak, T. Role of Infection and Immunity in Bovine Perinatal Abstract: Bovine perinatal mortality due to infection may result either from the direct effects of Mortality: Part 2. -
Clinical Genetics in Britain: Origins and Development
CLINICAL GENETICS IN BRITAIN: ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT The transcript of a Witness Seminar held by the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, London, on 23 September 2008 Edited by P S Harper, L A Reynolds and E M Tansey Volume 39 2010 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2010 First published by the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, 2010 The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL is funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 085484 127 1 All volumes are freely available online following the links to Publications/Wellcome Witnesses at www.ucl.ac.uk/histmed CONTENTS Illustrations and credits v Abbreviations vii Witness Seminars: Meetings and publications; Acknowledgements E M Tansey and L A Reynolds ix Introduction Sir John Bell xix Transcript Edited by P S Harper, L A Reynolds and E M Tansey 1 Appendix 1 Initiatives supporting clinical genetics, 1983–99 by Professor Rodney Harris 83 Appendix 2 The Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (AGNC) by Professor Heather Skirton 87 References 89 Biographical notes 113 Glossary 133 Index 137 ILLUSTRATIONS AND CREDITS Figure 1 Professor Lionel Penrose, c. 1960. Provided by and reproduced with permission of Professor Shirley Hodgson. 8 Figure 2 Dr Mary Lucas, clinical geneticist at the Galton Laboratory, explains a poster to the University of London’s Chancellor, Princess Anne, October 1981. Provided by and reproduced with permission of Professor Joy Delhanty. 9 Figure 3 (a) The karyotype of a phenotypically normal woman and (b) family pedigree, showing three generations with inherited translocation. -
Distinguishing Drift and Selection Empirically: “The Great Snail Debate” of the 1950S
Distinguishing Drift and Selection Empirically: “The Great Snail Debate” of the 1950s ROBERTA L. MILLSTEIN Department of Philosophy University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 USA E-mail: [email protected] Forthcoming in the Journal of the History of Biology -- no doubt, there will be some (hopefully small) changes in the proofing process Distinguishing Drift and Selection Empirically p. 1 Abstract: Biologists and philosophers have been extremely pessimistic about the possibility of demonstrating random drift in nature, particularly when it comes to distinguishing random drift from natural selection. However, examination of a historical case - Maxime Lamotte's study of natural populations of the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis in the 1950s - shows that while some pessimism is warranted, it has been overstated. Indeed, by describing a unique signature for drift and showing that this signature obtained in the populations under study, Lamotte was able to make a good case for a significant role for drift. It may be difficult to disentangle the causes of drift and selection acting in a population, but it is not (always) impossible. Keywords: adaptationism, Arthur J. Cain, conspicuous polymorphism, Cepaea nemoralis, random genetic drift, ecological genetics, evolution, Philip M. Sheppard, Maxime Lamotte, natural selection, selectionist Pessimistic Introduction The process known as “random drift”1 is often considered to be one of the most important chance elements in evolution. Yet, over the years, biologists and philosophers have expressed pessimism about the possibility of demonstrating random drift in nature. The following is just a sampling. In 1951, Arthur Cain argued: 1 Authors refer to this phenomenon variously as “random drift,” “genetic drift,” “random genetic drift,” or simply “drift,” without any apparent shift in meaning. -
Bourne Lecture
“One Medicine: the Continuum of Medicine, Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science”. Bourne Lecture. 12th February 2007. St Georges Medical School , Grenada. Ian McConnell , Professor of Veterinary Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, England, United Kingdom. Introduction. Chancellor, Provost , Ladies and Gentlemen. Thank you , Provost, for your generous introduction. It is indeed an honour to be invited to give this years Bourne lecture in memory of Geoffrey Bourne . Geoffrey Bourne , your first Vice Chancellor who as an educator and scientist who had the vision to create here in this marvellous country of Grenada a most remarkable medical school which later evolved under the leadership of Keith Taylor, as Vice Chancellor, into what is today- a thriving and confident young University. St George’s University is an internationally recognised institution of higher education which has set a dynamic global perspective and can rightly claim to be a stratgically important landmark of learning in the West Indies. In this lecture I am going to address the topic of “ One Medicine”. I have chosen this as a topic because it seems appropriate to the St. George’s Medical School and the close relationship it has with the veterinary school. The development of the veterinary school owes much to the foresight and drive of Peter Bourne, who as Vice Chancellor, fostered the development of veterinary medicine. In the long history of both the Medical and the Veterinary Professions and the education of undergraduates in both there has always been a healthy interaction between medicine, veterinary medicine as well as biomedical science. The co-location of a medical school with a veterinary school which you have here is one way to promote this interaction . -
Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan) -
Genetic Testing
GENETIC TESTING The transcript of a Witness Seminar held by the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, London, on 13 July 2001 Edited by D A Christie and E M Tansey Volume 17 2003 CONTENTS Illustrations v Introduction Professor Peter Harper vii Acknowledgements ix Witness Seminars: Meetings and publications xi E M Tansey and D A Christie Transcript Edited by D A Christie and E M Tansey 1 References 73 Biographical notes 91 Glossary 105 Index 115 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 Triploid cells in a human embryo, 1961. 20 Figure 2 The use of FISH with DNA probes from the X and Y chromosomes to sex human embryos. 62 v vi INTRODUCTION Genetic testing is now such a widespread and important part of medicine that it is hard to realize that it has almost all emerged during the past 30 years, with most of the key workers responsible for the discoveries and development of the field still living and active. This alone makes it a suitable subject for a Witness Seminar but there are others that increase its value, notably the fact that a high proportion of the critical advances took place in the UK; not just the basic scientific research, but also the initial applications in clinical practice, particularly those involving inherited disorders. To see these topics discussed by the people who were actually involved in their creation makes fascinating reading; for myself it is tinged with regret at having been unable to attend and contribute to the seminar, but with some compensation from being able to look at the contributions more objectively than can a participant. -
Clinical Genetics in Britain: Origins and Development Harper, PS; REYNOLDS, LA; TANSEY, EM
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Clinical Genetics in Britain: Origins and development Harper, PS; REYNOLDS, LA; TANSEY, EM For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/2823 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] CLINICAL GENETICS IN BRITAIN: ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT The transcript of a Witness Seminar held by the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, London, on 23 September 2008 Edited by P S Harper, L A Reynolds and E M Tansey Volume 39 2010 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2010 First published by the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, 2010 The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL is funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 085484 127 1 All volumes are freely available online at: www.history.qmul.ac.uk/research/modbiomed/wellcome_witnesses/ Please cite as : Reynolds L A, Tansey E M. (eds) (2010) Clinical Genetics in Britain: Origins and development. Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine, vol. 39. London: Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL. CONTENTS Illustrations and credits v Abbreviations vii Witness Seminars: Meetings and publications; Acknowledgements E M Tansey and L A Reynolds ix Introduction Sir John Bell xix Transcript Edited by P S Harper, L A Reynolds and E M Tansey 1 Appendix 1 Initiatives supporting clinical genetics, 1983–99 by Professor Rodney Harris 83 Appendix 2 The Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (AGNC) by Professor Heather Skirton 87 References 89 Biographical notes 113 Glossary 133 Index 137 ILLUSTRATIONS AND CREDITS Figure 1 Professor Lionel Penrose, c. -
Johnston, Alan
Alan Johnston Personal Details Name Alan Johnston Dates 1928 Place of Birth UK (Manchester) Main work places Aberdeen Principal field of work Clinical genetics Short biography See below Interview Recorded interview made Yes Interviewer Peter Harper Date of Interview 24/09/2008 Edited transcript available See below Personal Scientific Records Significant Record set exists Records catalogued Permanent place of archive Summary of archive Biography Alan Johnston was born 8.1.1928 in Manchester, educated at Manchester Grammar School and studied medicine at Cambridge and UCH qualifying in 1951. He later spent a year at Johns Hopkins Hospital. He became Consultant Physician in the Aberdeen Teaching Hospitals in 1966 and subsequently Clinical Senior Lecturer in medicine and genetics. Fellowship of the three Colleges of Physicians followed. With Eric McKay, he initiated the clinical genetics service for N.E.Scotland. With David Pyke, he played a crucial role in the setting up of the Clinical Genetics Committee of the College of Physicians and was its first Hon. Sec. He also served in various capacities on other committees and working parties concerned in the recognition of the specialty and its training programme, including the Scottish Molecular Genetics Consortium. In addition to lectures to the Royal Colleges, he published around one hundred papers. His outside interests include eldership of the Church of Scotland, active membership of the Christian Medical Fellowship, travel, gardening, archaeology and three grandchildren. INTERVIEW WITH DR ALAN JOHNSTON, 24th SEPTEMBER, 2008 PSH. It’s 24th September 2008 and I’m talking with Dr Alan Johnston from Aberdeen and the recording is being made in London. -
Cain on Linnaeus: the Scientist-Historian As Unanalysed Entity
Stud. Hist. Phil. Biol. & Biomed. Sci., Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 239–254, 2001 Pergamon 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain 1369-8486/01 $ - see front matter www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsc Cain on Linnaeus: The Scientist-Historian as Unanalysed Entity Mary P. Winsor* Zoologist A. J. Cain began historical research on Linnaeus in 1956 in connection with his dissatisfaction over the standard taxonomic hierarchy and the rules of binomial nomenclature. His famous 1958 paper ‘Logic and Memory in Linnaeus’s System of Taxonomy’ argues that Linnaeus was following Aristotle’s method of logical division without appreciating that it properly applies only to ‘analysed entities’ such as geo- metric figures whose essential nature is already fully known. The essence of living things being unanalysed, there is no basis on which to choose the right characters to define a genus nor on which to differentiate species. Yet Cain’s understanding of Aristotle, which depended on a 1916 text by H. W. B. Joseph, was fatally flawed. In the 1990s Cain devoted himself to further historical study and softened his verdict on Linnaeus, praising his empiricism. The idea that Linnaeus was applying an ancient and inappropriate method cries out for fresh study and revision. 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: A. J. Cain; Linnaeus; Aristotle; Essentialism; Systematics; Logic. The category to which the following belongs is not the history of systematics but the history of the history of systematics. I have just one small tale to tell, but I suspect there are similar tales scattered about unnoticed in the history of other sciences, and it seems to me they are worth uncovering. -
Did Kettlewell Commit Fraud? Re-Examining The
www.ssoar.info Did Kettlewell commit fraud? Re-examining the evidence Rudge, David Wÿss Postprint / Postprint Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: www.peerproject.eu Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Rudge, D. W. (2005). Did Kettlewell commit fraud? Re-examining the evidence. Public Understanding of Science, 14(3), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505052890 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter dem "PEER Licence Agreement zur This document is made available under the "PEER Licence Verfügung" gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zum PEER-Projekt finden Agreement ". For more Information regarding the PEER-project Sie hier: http://www.peerproject.eu Gewährt wird ein nicht see: http://www.peerproject.eu This document is solely intended exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches und beschränktes for your personal, non-commercial use.All of the copies of Recht auf Nutzung dieses Dokuments. Dieses Dokument this documents must retain all copyright information and other ist ausschließlich für den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to alter Gebrauch bestimmt. Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute auf gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses or otherwise use the document in public. Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated Sie dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke conditions of use. vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.