View Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

View Annual Report 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Brookfield Business Partners L.P. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) អ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ፤ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 OR អ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR អ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 001-37775 Brookfield Business Partners L.P. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) N/A (Translation of Registrant’s name into English) Bermuda (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 73 Front Street Hamilton, HM 12 Bermuda (Address of principal executive offices) Brookfield Business Partners L.P. 73 Front Street Hamilton, HM 12 Bermuda Tel: +441-294-3309 (Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Limited Partnership Units New York Stock Exchange Limited Partnership Units Toronto Stock Exchange Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 51,845,298 Limited Partnership Units as of December 31, 2016. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No ፤ If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes No ፤ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No អ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No អ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of ‘‘accelerated filer and large accelerated filer’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer អ Accelerated filer អ Non-accelerated filer ፤ Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAP International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the Other International Accounting Standards Board If ‘‘Other’’ has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 Item 18 អ If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No ፤ Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION AND USE OF CERTAIN TERMS ......................................... 1 NOTICE REGARDING PRESENTATION OF OUR RESERVE INFORMATION ...................... 6 SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ............................. 8 PART I......................................................................... 10 ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS ................ 10 ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE .............................. 10 ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION .................................................... 10 3.A. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA ........................................... 10 3.B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS ................................... 11 3.C. REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS ......................... 11 3.D. RISK FACTORS ..................................................... 11 ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON OUR COMPANY ......................................... 53 4.A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF OUR COMPANY ........................... 53 4.B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW ................................................ 54 4.C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ........................................ 77 4.D. PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT .................................... 80 ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS .......................................... 80 ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS ........................ 80 5.A. OPERATING RESULTS ................................................ 80 5.B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES ...................................113 5.C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC. ................123 5.D. TREND INFORMATION ...............................................123 5.E. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS ...................................124 5.F. TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS .....................124 5.G. SAFE HARBOR .....................................................124 ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES .........................125 6.A. DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT .................................125 6.B. COMPENSATION ...................................................127 6.C. BOARD PRACTICES .................................................128 6.D. EMPLOYEES .......................................................133 6.E. SHARE OWNERSHIP .................................................133 ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS ..................136 7.A. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS .............................................136 7.B. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS .......................................137 7.C. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL ..................................152 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ...............................................153 8.A. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION ...........153 8.B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES ..............................................153 ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING ................................................153 9.A. OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS .........................................153 9.B. PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION ..............................................154 9.C. MARKETS ........................................................154 9.D. SELLING SHAREHOLDERS ............................................154 9.E. DILUTION ........................................................154 9.F. EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE .............................................154 ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION .............................................154 i Page 10.A. SHARE CAPITAL ....................................................154 10.B. MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION ...........................155 10.C. MATERIAL CONTRACTS ..............................................179 10.D. EXCHANGE CONTROLS ..............................................179 10.E. TAXATION ........................................................179 10.F. DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS .......................................208 10.G. STATEMENT BY EXPERTS .............................................208 10.H DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY ............................................209 10.I. SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION ...........................................209 ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK ...........209 ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES ................209 PART II........................................................................210 ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES .....................210 ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS ...........................................................210 ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ............................................210 ITEM 16. ....................................................................210 16.A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT ..................................210 16.B. CODE OF ETHICS ...................................................210 16.C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES .............................211 16.D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES .........211 16.E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS 211 16.F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT .......................211 16.G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ...........................................211 16.H. MINING SAFETY DISCLOSURE .........................................212 PART III........................................................................213 ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ................................................213 ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ................................................213 ITEM 19. EXHIBITS ............................................................213 SIGNATURES ....................................................................214
Recommended publications
  • Case Study Australia 108, Melbourne
    Case Study Australia 108, Melbourne CoxGomyl delivers a complete facade access solution for the tallest residential tower in Australia Australia 108 is the tallest residential tower in the Southern Hemisphere by height to the roof, surpassing Eureka Tower and Queensland’s Q1 Tower. The bold and imaginative design by Fender Katsalidis Architects, towers 320 metres and 100 stories over Melbourne’s famous Southbank precinct. Facts & Figures Beyond the sheer scale of the building, the complex aesthetic is inspired by the Commonwealth Star of the Australian flag with a unique golden ‘starburst’ feature projecting out from the slender, curving form of the tower across levels 69 to 72. Commencement 2020 The ambitious scale of the building and its complex geography required the Completion 2020 experience and expertise of CoxGomyl as market leaders in facade access solutions in order to ensure practical, reliable access coverage and safeguard Building Height 320m the well being of the tower for years into the future. The comprehensive building access system developed by the CoxGomyl Floor Count 100 team is made up of five Building Maintenance Units working in harmony to provide all of the required coverage and functionality. The first BMU is No. of BMUs 5 located in a fixed position at roof level which services the area from the top of the building to the bottom of the starburst feature. With a reach of nearly 34 metres and a system of mullion guides which allow operators to manoeuvre Outreach Up to 33.94m the cradle out from the main facade surface, this challenging feature is made conveniently accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia: Rising up Down Under 2. Journal Paper Ctbuh.Org/Papers
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Australia: Rising Up Down Under Authors: Subject: Architectural/Design Publication Date: 2017 Original Publication: CTBUH Journal 2017 Issue IV Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Tall Buildings in Numbers Australia: Rising Up Down Under Australia is one of the world’s least densely-populated countries, Study of 100m+ Buildings in Australia and yet it has one of the highest proportions of urban dwellers, a 356 Completed; 82 Under Construction; 438 Total figure that is increasing. A boom in tall building construction is underway, paralleled by several significant transportation projects, Government Adelaide 0.7% (3) 0.9% (4) particularly in the three CTBUH 2017 Conference cities of Sydney, Hotel Education Perth Melbourne and Brisbane. This study examines the timeline, 5% (22) 0.2% (1) 5.9% (26) composition, and location of buildings 100 meters and taller (complete or under construction), set against the backdrop of new Mixed-Use Gold Coast 11.4% (50) public transportation projects that are “connecting the city” and 12.1% (53) Melbourne 33.3% (146) aligning towards a denser, more sustainable future. Residential Brisbane 45.4% (199) 16% (70) Note: The six cities in this study are Australia’s six largest in terms of population, and all O ffi c e contain at least one 100-meter or taller building. “City” in this study is identical to a 36.5% (160) “metropolitan area,” as defined by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Buildings in 2020: COVID-19 Contributes to Dip in Year-On-Year Completions
    CTBUH Year in Review: Tall Trends of 2020 Tall Buildings in 2020: COVID-19 Contributes To Dip in Year-On-Year Completions Abstract In 2020, the tall building industry constructed 106 buildings of 200 meters’ height or greater, a 20 percent decline from 2019, when 133 such buildings were completed.* The decline can be partly attributed to work stoppages and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report provides analysis and commentary on global and regional trends underway during an eventful year. Research Project Kindly Sponsored by: Note: Please refer to Tall Buildings in Numbers—The Global Tall Building Picture: Impact of 2020 in conjunction with this Schindler paper, pages 48–49. *The study sets a minimum threshold of 200 meters’ height because of the completeness of data available on buildings of that height. Keywords: Construction, COVID-19, Development, Height, Hotel, Megatall, Mixed-Use, Office, Residential, Supertall Introduction This is the second year in a row in which Center (New York City) completed, that the the completion figure declined. In 2019, tallest building of the year was in the For many people, 2020 will be remembered the reasons for this were varied, though United States. as the year that nothing went to plan. The the change in the tall building climate in same can be said for the tall building China, with public policy statements This is also the first year since 2014 in which industry. As a global pandemic took hold in against needless production of there has not been at least one building the first quarter, numerous projects around exceedingly tall buildings, constituted a taller than 500 meters completed.
    [Show full text]
  • CTBUH Journal
    About the Council The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, based at the Illinois Institute of CTBUH Journal Technology in Chicago, is an international International Journal on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat not-for-profi t organization supported by architecture, engineering, planning, development, and construction professionals. Founded in 1969, the Council’s mission is to disseminate multi-disciplinary information on Tall buildings: design, construction, and operation | 2013 Issue III tall buildings and sustainable urban environments, to maximize the international interaction of professionals involved in creating the built environment, and to make the latest Case Study: The Bow, Calgary knowledge available to professionals in a useful form. Debating Tall: Do Trees Belong on Skyscrapers? The CTBUH disseminates its fi ndings, and Imagining the Tall Building of the Future facilitates business exchange, through: the publication of books, monographs, The Use of Stainless Steel in Second-Skin Façades proceedings, and reports; the organization of world congresses, international, regional, and Politics, History, and Height in Warsaw specialty conferences and workshops; the maintaining of an extensive website and tall Using CFD to Optimize Tall Buildings building databases of built, under construction, and proposed buildings; the distribution of a Tall Building in Numbers: Vanity Height monthly international tall building e-newsletter; the maintaining of an Talking Tall: Tall Timber Building international resource center; the bestowing of annual awards for design and construction Special Report: CTBUH 2013 London Conference excellence and individual lifetime achievement; the management of special task forces/ working groups; the hosting of technical forums; and the publication of the CTBUH Journal, a professional journal containing refereed papers written by researchers, scholars, and practicing professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities of the Future
    CITIES OF THE FUTURE CITIES OF THE FUTURE Chris Johnson, CEO of Urban Taskforce Australia, discussed the Cities of the Future at the recent API National Conference. VANESSA MITCHELL reports. 019 CITIES OF THE FUTURE SYDNEY NEEDS TO DOUBLE ITS AMOUNT OF HOMES FROM THE CURRENT 1.66 MILLION OVER THE NEXT 40 YEARS he cities of the locate growth around city centres, of tall buildings across the world. future are going to corridors and public transport nodes “Seventy-five stories is the be more urbanised, for a new way of living. We will see tallest building in Sydney currently, with higher density high-rise developments around due to aircraft restrictions, but this living—particularly railway stations and a spreading is changing. Taround public transport hubs. out to areas within walking distance “In New York we are seeing a These sometimes contentious of railway stations. trend towards tall, thin, elegant issues were discussed by Chris “This is already happening; we are buildings, such as 111 West 57th Street Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of seeing towers popping up in various (see image on previous page), which Urban Taskforce Australia, on the final areas that include a mix of residential features one apartment per floor and day of the API National Conference. and commercial offerings. What stands at over 1,400 feet. The top Chris, who is a former NSW needs to happen in the future is a apartment of this development sold Government Architect and former strong integration between transport for US$90 million recently. Executive Director at the NSW networks and the planning system, “Australia 108, featuring 100 Department of Planning, said we will and dialogue between these two areas.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read the Full Article CLICK to Download PDF
    QUARTERLY REVIEW Issue 3 TALL BUILDINGS Published by Robert Bird Group All rights reserved. 17052018 Making the Most of Tight Spaces Attaining Higher Expectations At Work PNB 118 - Tallest Building in Kuala Lumpur, Fifth Tallest Building in the World Shard - ICE Award Winning Construction Methodology Australia 108 - Tallest Residential Building in the Southern Hemisphere Crown Sydney Dubai’s ICD Brookfield Melbourne’s Southbank Precinct Queensbridge Tower REACHING The Spire London FOR THE SKY Reaching for the Sky Front cover image: Australia 108, Melbourne 2 Inside cover image: The Spire, London From the time of the earliest civilizations, there has been the desire to build the biggest, the tallest of structures. Visions of grandeur, be they in the eyes of kings or corporate giants, have inspired not only architects but also the engineers charged with realizing those visions. “When Robert Bird first started in Brisbane in 1982, a tall building would be 30 storeys,” recalls Robert Bird Group deputy chairman Grant Weir. “Today, it’s more like 50 storeys and up.” That shift in scale has elevated RBG into an exclusive league of structural engineers with the experience, technology and expertise to engineer some of the worlds tallest, best-known modern buildings. Reaching new heights presents new challenges and new standards of quality and safety. Achieving bold iconic designs calls for intense scrutiny of details, aided by modern technology’s ability to virtually build and test these mega-structures through building information modelling. “The higher you go, the more you have to deal with some age-old issues, one of the most significant being the ability to transport workers and materials during construction,” notes Simon Cloherty, director of UK Buildings at RBG.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIA 108 World Class Global
    VIC PROJECT FEATURE AUSTRALIA 108 World Class Global 96 VIC PROJECT FEATURE AUSTRALIA 108 AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION REVIEW WWW.ANCR.COM.AU VIC PROJECT FEATURE AUSTRALIA 108 97 REACH FOR THE SKY DEVELOPER : World Class Global MAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY : Multiplex ARCHITECT : Fender Katsalidis PROJECT MANAGER : Sinclair Brook CONSTRUCTION VALUE : $550 million Australia 108 is an incredible landmark $550M skyscraper soaring over 300m high, making it the tallest building in Melbourne and home to the highest apartments in the Southern Hemisphere. The project includes 1,105 luxurious apartments and extensive resident facilities including a 25m lap pool, sauna, steam rooms, gym, private theatre, private dining rooms, virtual golf, infinity edge pool, sky garden, and stunning 360 external views. Rising in the exclusive Southbank district Multiplex introduced new techniques to This exceptional project is a highlight of Melbourne is a new luxury address build Australia 108 including the creation in World Class Global’s catalogue of developed by World Class Global and of purpose built platforms from which developments. “We are so proud of unlike any other in Australia. Standing at builders could install the golden panels of Australia 108 and the outcomes,” said David. 319m tall, Australia 108 will be the tallest the Starburst. An innovative formwork “We are creating an icon on Melbourne’s residential building in Australia, soaring screen system was also used to mitigate skyline which will remain part of the city’s to 100-levels above the city with 1,105 the risk of falling objects over the busy legacy for years to come.” premium apartments and 360 degree views streets below, allowing the façade to be of Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerating Net-Zero High-Rise Residential Buildings in Australia
    Accelerating Net-Zero High-Rise Residential Buildings in Australia Final Report transport | community | mining | industrial | food & beverage | carbon & energy Prepared for: City of Sydney Client representative: Chris Derksema Nik Midlam Date: 31 August 2016 In association with: Inspired thinking embracing the challenges of a changing world. Acknowledgement pitt&sherry would like to acknowledge the organisations and individuals who made this project possible. Firstly the Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance (CNCA) and philanthropies which funded this work in recognition of the global imperative for net-zero buildings as an essential part of a low-carbon and prosperous future. The City of Sydney for scoping and commissioning this work, with assistance from the City of Melbourne. Also the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, The Green Building Council of Australia, the Property Council of Australia, the NSW Department of Planning and Environment, members of the City of Sydney Residential Stakeholders Working Group and staff and others who have all provided input to this report. Very considerable contribution was made to this report by Mike Rainbow and Jan Talacko of ark resources, particularly in Chapters 3 and 4. We would like to acknowledge the developers whose actual buildings in Sydney and Melbourne were modelled, Ecove Pty (Australia Towers) and Innovative Construction & Development Pty Ltd (EQ Tower). Finally, we would like to acknowledge the large number of excellent comments received on the draft report from a wide range of stakeholders, which we have done our best to reflect in this final report. Prepared by: Philip Harrington Date: 31 August 2016 Reviewed by: Mark Johnston Date: 31 August 2016 Authorised by: Philip Harrington Date: 31 August 2016 Revision History Rev Description Prepared by Reviewed by Authorised by Date No.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Australia's Cities Outgrowing Its
    ARE AUSTRALIA’S CITIES OUTGROWING ITS CONSTRUCTION LEGISLATION? MATTHEW BELL* This article examines the way in which legislative regulation seeks to enhance consumer protection in relation to the procurement of residential construction work. Its focus is upon reforms to the statutory regime for such protection in Victoria which were enacted during 2016–17. These reforms are primarily directed towards reducing the incidence of defective work through the tightening of ‘quality assurance’ provisions, such as ensuring that work is carried out by qualified practitioners, and of ‘safety net’ measures such as conciliation processes to avoid the escalation of disputes. The article analyses these reforms by reference to identified problems relating to defective residential construction work. These range from high-profile incidents such as the 2014 cladding-related fire at the Lacrosse Apartments in Melbourne (and the fire, with similar causes yet tragically more disastrous consequences, at the Grenfell Tower in London in 2017), through to more mundane — yet, frequently occurring — problems such as poor workmanship and behaviours. The article concludes that the Victorian reforms are clearly directed towards many of these identified problems. It cautions, however, that the success of the reforms in contributing to an effective consumer protection regime may be limited because other factors contributing to the widespread incidence of defects remain unaddressed. These factors include gaps such as the non-prescriptive nature of many of the regulatory requirements, and the limited capacity of project participants to assimilate the detailed requirements of the regime, and for regulators to enforce it. I INTRODUCTION AND OUTLINE Australia has, according to its national anthem, ‘boundless plains to share’.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentials and Limitations of Supertall Building Structural Systems: Guiding for Architects
    POTENTIALS AND LIMITATIONS OF SUPERTALL BUILDING STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: GUIDING FOR ARCHITECTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY HÜSEYİN EMRE ILGIN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BUILDING SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE JULY 2018 Approval of the thesis: POTENTIALS AND LIMITATIONS OF SUPERTALL BUILDING STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: GUIDING FOR ARCHITECTS submitted by HÜSEYİN EMRE ILGIN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Department of Architecture, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Halil Kalıpçılar Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. F. Cânâ Bilsel Head of Department, Architecture Assoc. Prof. Dr. Halis Günel Supervisor, Department of Architecture, METU Assist. Prof. Dr. Bekir Özer Ay Co-Supervisor, Department of Architecture, METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Cüneyt Elker Department of Architecture, Çankaya University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Halis Günel Department of Architecture, METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Tavukçuoğlu Department of Architecture, METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ali Murat Tanyer Department of Architecture, METU Prof. Dr. Adile Nuray Bayraktar Department of Architecture, Başkent University Date: 03.07.2018 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Hüseyin Emre ILGIN Signature: iv ABSTRACT POTENTIALS AND LIMITATIONS OF SUPERTALL BUILDING STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: GUIDING FOR ARCHITECTS Ilgın, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Above the Clouds
    Living Above the Clouds Highly-anticipated residential project by Singapore developer World Class Land is set to be Melbourne’s tallest building and tallest residence in terms of habitable space, in Austral ia and the southern hemisphere. Singapore, 24 October, 2014 – A new iconic 100-storey structure is set to dominate the skyline of Melbourne, Australia, as Singapore- based World Class Land presents Australia 108 at a special Singapore preview showcase from this Saturday, 25 October, 2014 . Initially envisioned as a 108-storey skyscraper before being lowered to accommodate airplane flight paths – hence inspiring the name – Australia 108 is an incomparable landmark reaching 319 metres into the heavens . It will comprise 1,105 units ranging from studio apartments to a massive 8,772 sq ft ‘super- penthouse’. Ideally located in the heart of the vibrant Southbank, close to the famed Crown Casino, Melbourne Exhibition Centre, the Melbourne Arts Precinct, Royal Botanic Gardens, and Queen Victoria Park, the development is also minutes away by car or tram from the CBD, the iconic Flinders Street Train Station, Federation Square , and the Bourke Street shopping belt . Residents will find themselves well connected to this vibrant city’s myriad of cafes and restaurants, and will get to enjoy finer aspects Artist Impression of life such as a well-established arts scene WCL-SOUTHBANK (VIC) PTY LTD (Australian Company No. 167 425 434) 55 Ubi Avenue 1 #05 -16, Ubi 55 Building, Singapore 408935 Tel : (65) 6840 7777 Fax : (65) 6841 7460 1 and exciting sporting calendar. All of these have contributed to Melbourne being named the world's most liveable city for the fourth year in a row, by the Economist Intelligence Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Singularly Slender: Sky Living in New York, Hong Kong, and Elsewhere 3. Conference Proceeding Ctbuh.Org/Papers
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Singularly Slender: Sky Living in New York, Hong Kong, and Elsewhere Author: Carol Willis, The Skyscraper Museum Subject: Architectural/Design Keywords: Design Process Residential Supertall Publication Date: 2016 Original Publication: Cities to Megacities: Shaping Dense Vertical Urbanism Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Carol Willis Singularly Slender: Sky Living in New York, Hong Kong, and Elsewhere | 纤细非凡的建筑:纽约、香港等地的云端生活 Abstract | 摘要 Carol Willis Founding Director | 创会理事 This paper highlights a new 21st-century skyscraper typology – the very tall and slender The Skyscraper Museum residential tower – and analyzes the economic, engineering, and urbanistic forces that shape 摩天大楼博物馆 them. Once built exclusively in Manhattan and Hong Kong, “pencil towers” of 80 to 100 stories New York City, USA and taller are now rising in a handful of other cities, including Dubai, Melbourne, Brisbane, 纽约,美国 Toronto and Mumbai. With a base-to-height ratio of at least 1:10, but with some recent designs Carol Willis is the founder and director of The Skyscraper Museum in New York City and the curator for more than 20 reaching a ratio of, so far, 1:23, the super-slender phenomenon has a wide range. The paper exhibitions. An architectural and urban historian, she is the distinguishes two types of super-slims with significantly different development strategies: the author of Form Follows Finance: Skyscrapers and Skylines in New York and Chicago (1995) and has edited and contributed ultra-luxury towers (defined by the exclusivity of one to two units per floor) currently found only essays to numerous monographs and collections.
    [Show full text]