Tall Buildings in 2020: COVID-19 Contributes to Dip in Year-On-Year Completions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tall Buildings in 2020: COVID-19 Contributes to Dip in Year-On-Year Completions CTBUH Year in Review: Tall Trends of 2020 Tall Buildings in 2020: COVID-19 Contributes To Dip in Year-On-Year Completions Abstract In 2020, the tall building industry constructed 106 buildings of 200 meters’ height or greater, a 20 percent decline from 2019, when 133 such buildings were completed.* The decline can be partly attributed to work stoppages and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report provides analysis and commentary on global and regional trends underway during an eventful year. Research Project Kindly Sponsored by: Note: Please refer to Tall Buildings in Numbers—The Global Tall Building Picture: Impact of 2020 in conjunction with this Schindler paper, pages 48–49. *The study sets a minimum threshold of 200 meters’ height because of the completeness of data available on buildings of that height. Keywords: Construction, COVID-19, Development, Height, Hotel, Megatall, Mixed-Use, Office, Residential, Supertall Introduction This is the second year in a row in which Center (New York City) completed, that the the completion figure declined. In 2019, tallest building of the year was in the For many people, 2020 will be remembered the reasons for this were varied, though United States. as the year that nothing went to plan. The the change in the tall building climate in same can be said for the tall building China, with public policy statements This is also the first year since 2014 in which industry. As a global pandemic took hold in against needless production of there has not been at least one building the first quarter, numerous projects around exceedingly tall buildings, constituted a taller than 500 meters completed. the world, at various stages, ground to a strong factor that has persisted into 2020. halt as restrictions on assembly came into force. It is therefore not surprising that 2020 The tallest building to complete in 2020 Effects of COVID-19 yielded 106 completions of buildings 200 was Central Park Tower in New York City, at meters and taller, a 20 percent decline from 472 meters. This is the first time in five As with most other enterprises, the degree 133 in 2019, and nearing a level last seen in years in which the tallest completed to which the COVID-19 pandemic directly 2014, when 105 such buildings were building was not in China, and the first affected the construction schedule of a tall constructed (see Figure 1). time since 2014, when One World Trade building in 2020 was highly variable in relation to local regulations and the ability of the contractor to keep a sufficient number of workers on-site. CTBUH is anecdotally aware of nine projects across Malaysia, India and Brazil whose completion schedules were pushed into There were 106 completions of 2021 as a direct consequence of COVID-19. 200-meter-plus“ buildings, a 20 percent There were mandated work stoppages in cities such as New York and San Francisco, decline from 2019, and nearing a level last though these could not be traced to any specific delays. As tall buildings are often seen in 2014, when 105 such buildings were lagging economic indicators, any chilling effect that economic conditions or work constructed.This is the second year in a row interruptions may have had on new project starts, or projects that were under in which the completion figure declined. construction in 2020 and were scheduled ” to be completed in 2021 or later, remains to be seen. It must be remembered, the economic crisis of 2008 was not reflected 40 | CTBUH Year in Review CTBUH Journal | 2021 Issue I 180 170 2,000 1,883 MAX 160 1,858 1,800 1,733 MIN 150 MAX 150 148 1,600 143 140 136 1,400 133 130 125 MIN 1,200 120 117 110 1,000 105 106 Number of 200 m+ buildings 100 800 Projected number of 200 m+ 90 610 600 85 buildings 80 Number of supertalls (300 m+) 400 73 71 71 70 262 221 Projected number of MAX 191 200 supertalls (300 m+) 145 205 60 28 71 50 MIN Number of megatalls (600 m+) 15 13 26 54 51 6 11 11 3 7 0 50 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2021 Projected number of megatalls (600 m+) 40 33 30 31 32 30 MAX Notes: 27 26 23 1. We can predict 2021 building 22 21 completions with some accuracy, 20 19 18 18 14 15 16 16 15 15 due to projects now in advanced 13 MIN 11 12 11 construction. A range is given to 10 9 99 9 9 10 7 8 8 8 acknowledge the challenging factors 5 666 6 5 3 3 33 3 4 3 in predicting completion dates. 1 1 221 222 11111 2 11 1 0 2. Totals after 2001 take into account the destruction of the World Trade 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Center Towers 1 and 2. Figure 1. Main chart: Number of 200-meter-plus buildings completed in each year from 1980 to 2020, with a 2021 projection. Inset: Total number of 200-meter-plus buildings in existence at decade’s end, from 1930 to 2020, with a 2021 projection. Europe: 8 7.5% on skylines, in terms of lower completion from 57 in 2019 and 92 in 2018. Asia Oceania: 2 1.9% rates, until 2010 and 2011. (excluding the Middle East) accounted for 66 percent of the global total, compared to a 69 percent share in 2019 (see Figure 2). Key Worldwide Market Snapshots The second-most prolific country was the Middle East: 14 It can be assumed that many more projects United Arab Emirates, which completed 13.2% than discussed previously encountered twelve 200-meter-plus buildings, followed difficulties due to COVID-19, if indirectly. by the United States with 10, and the North America: 12 11.3% Asia: 70 And of course, there were other reasons for United Kingdom with five (see Figures 3 66.0% delays. One project in New York became and 4). India completed three 200-meter- embroiled in a zoning dispute. Work on plus buildings in 2020, all of which are in Baku Tower was halted due to Azerbaijan’s Mumbai, and two of which, World One and military conflict with Armenia. World View, are in the same complex, and are the city’s and country’s new tallest China alone still completed more than half buildings. Mexico had two entries in the Figure 2. Buildings 200 meters or taller completed in the total buildings in the study (56), down 200-meter-plus club, with Monterrey, 2020, by region. CTBUH Journal | 2021 Issue I CTBUH Year in Review | 41 80 Countries Cities completing a 200 m+ building 70 Countries completing a 200 m+ building Cities 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Figure 3. Number of cities and countries completing a 200-meter-plus building, 1978–2020. 60 Total Number Sum of Heights (m) 20,000 Note: Only countries with at least two completions in 2020 are included in this chart. One 200 m+ tall building was also completed during 2020 48 in these countries: Philippines, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. 16,000 Sum of Heights (m) 36 12,000 ompletions 24 8,000 Number of C 12 4,000 0 0 China UAE US UK South Korea India Japan Russia Australia Mexico Thailand Figure 4. Buildings 200 meters or taller completed in 2020, by country. the northern industrial capital, and its The most prolific skyscraper-building city city four times in a row from 2015 to 2019. In well-heeled neighbor San Pedro Garza this year was Dubai, with 12 completions, 2020, Shenzhen completed nine such Garcia each contributing one completion. T. accounting for all of the UAE’s 200-meter- buildings, down from 18 in 2019, dropping Op Torre 1 in Monterrey (305 meters), is the plus buildings and topping its 2019 total by the south China megacity to second place. first supertall to complete in Mexico. It is three (see Figure 5). The last time Dubai held notable that this occurred outside Mexico this title was 2010, the year the world’s There were 16 cities to get a new tallest City, traditionally the locus of the nation’s current tallest building, the Burj Khalifa, was building, down from 19 in 2018 and 20 in tall building activity. completed. This broke the streak of 2019 (see Table 1). Shenzhen, which was the world-champion 42 | CTBUH Year in Review CTBUH Journal | 2021 Issue I Cities With the Two Tallest Buildings in and higher. The first time, in 1930, the Bank completed. The third was in 1963, when One Year of Manhattan Building (283 meters) briefly the MetLife (Pan Am) Building (246 became the world’s tallest building, but was meters) and 277 Park Avenue (209 New York City had the two tallest buildings surpassed by a cleverly-disguised spire meters) both completed. The two to complete in 2020, Central Park Tower, at inside the crown of the Chrysler Building original World Trade Center towers (No. 472 meters, and One Vanderbilt, at 427 (319 meters), which was raised at the last 1, North Tower, 417 meters, 1972; and meters (see Table 2, Figure 6, and Figure 7).
Recommended publications
  • Read Where Architecture Expert Paul Goldberg Comments on the History of New York's Famous Skyscrapers. As You Do So, Complete
    Can you identify any of these buildings? What do they all have in common? Which one do you like best? Read where architecture expert Paul Goldberg comments on the history of New York’s famous skyscrapers. As you do so, complete the following tasks: · In New York buildings are not only buildings, they become ___________________ · New York took over Chicago as regards skyscrapers in ___________________. · The Woolworth building was the tallest building worldwide for _________________. · The _______________ defined the Manhattan skyline. · They are trying to keep a memory of the people who were lost and also to show New York’s ______________________________. · New York stands out from the other cities as the embodiment of ____________________. Woolworth Building; Empire State Building; Chrysler Building; Flatiron; Hearst Tower The Woolworth Building, at 57 stories (floors), is one of the oldest—and one of the most famous—skyscrapers in New York City. It was the world’s tallest building for 17 years. More than 95 years after its construction, it is still one of the fifty tallest buildings in the United States as well as one of the twenty tallest buildings in New York City. The building is a National Historic Landmark, having been listed in 1966. The Empire State Building is a 102-story landmark Art Deco skyscraper in New York City at the intersection of Fifth Avenue and West 34th Street. Like many New York building, it has become seen as a work of art. Its name is derived from the nickname for New York, The Empire State. It stood as the world's tallest building for more than 40 years, from its completion in 1931 until construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower was completed in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • A – SMOKE and MIRRORS (The United Nations Building to Grand
    SMOKE AND MIRRORS (The United Nations to Grand Central Station) ____________________________________________ At the edge of the world sits a Tower. And this Tower is no structure of brick and mortar, but a kind of illusion; a trick of the light, flickering electric blue in and out of sight; a coalescing of vapors; of misplaced goodwill. The kings and queens of the world attend here, pronouncing PEACE, while raining armaments on those of their own, or those of their own they believe to be not. But still the pilgrims come in the thousands from the Terminal seeking an audience, uninformed or disregarding of this Congregation’s inadequacy. Through miles of devastated landscape they come with their fragile appeals in their hands, towards the Tower shimmering like a mirage in the distance; and the mediaeval brick city-fortress that guards its flanks. Around them, light and shadow play upon pillars of glass and steel, reflected one upon the other so reality is indiscernible from reflection; so the pilgrim, his eyes confused and diverted, does not realise that there is in fact, nothing behind the smoke and mirrors; that this entire landscape of grandiose ideals is insubstantial. Ting 8 1 – The United Nations Secretariat Tower, completed in 1952 and designed by an international committee of architects, including Le Corbusier, Oscar Niemeyer, amongst others. Ting 9 2 – Isaiah 2:4, on the Scharansky steps, named after a Soviet dissident, and part of the Ralphe Bunche Park. This park is across from the UN complex. 3 – Channelling Hampton Court: Tudor City, a luxury residential project built between 1925-28, by the Fred F.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRYSLER BUILDING, 405 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 12. 1978~ Designation List 118 LP-0992 CHRYSLER BUILDING, 405 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1928- 1930; architect William Van Alen. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1297, Lot 23. On March 14, 1978, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a_public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Chrysler Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 12). The item was again heard on May 9, 1978 (Item No. 3) and July 11, 1978 (Item No. 1). All hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Thirteen witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were two speakers in opposition to designation. The Commission has received many letters and communications supporting designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Chrysler Building, a stunning statement in the Art Deco style by architect William Van Alen, embodies the romantic essence of the New York City skyscraper. Built in 1928-30 for Walter P. Chrysler of the Chrysler Corporation, it was "dedicated to world commerce and industry."! The tallest building in the world when completed in 1930, it stood proudly on the New York skyline as a personal symbol of Walter Chrysler and the strength of his corporation. History of Construction The Chrysler Building had its beginnings in an office building project for William H. Reynolds, a real-estate developer and promoter and former New York State senator. Reynolds had acquired a long-term lease in 1921 on a parcel of property at Lexington Avenue and 42nd Street owned by the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Buildings, New Views Recent Renovations Around Town Have Uncovered Views of Manhattan That Had Been Hiding in Plain Sight
    The New York Times: Real Estate May 7, 2021 Old Buildings, New Views Recent renovations around town have uncovered views of Manhattan that had been hiding in plain sight. By Caroline Biggs Impressions: 43,264,806 While New York City’s skyline is ever changing, some recent construction and additions to historic buildings across the city have revealed some formerly hidden, but spectacular, views to the world. These views range from close-up looks at architectural details that previously might have been visible only to a select few, to bird’s-eye views of towers and cupolas that until The New York Times: Real Estate May 7, 2021 recently could only be viewed from the street. They provide a novel way to see parts of Manhattan and shine a spotlight on design elements that have largely been hiding in plain sight. The structures include office buildings that have created new residential spaces, like the Woolworth Building in Lower Manhattan; historic buildings that have had towers added or converted to create luxury housing, like Steinway Hall on West 57th Street and the Waldorf Astoria New York; and brand-new condo towers that allow interesting new vantages of nearby landmarks. “Through the first decades of the 20th century, architects generally had the belief that the entire building should be designed, from sidewalk to summit,” said Carol Willis, an architectural historian and founder and director of the Skyscraper Museum. “Elaborate ornament was an integral part of both architectural design and the practice of building industry.” In the examples that we share with you below, some of this lofty ornamentation is now available for view thanks to new residential developments that have recently come to market.
    [Show full text]
  • CFTC Rule 1.55(K) and 1.55(O): FCM-Specific Disclosure Document
    COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 1.55(K) AND 1.55(O): FCM-SPECIFIC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) requires each futures commission merchant (“FCM”), including J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“JPMS LLC”), to provide the following information to a customer prior to the time the customer first enters into an account agreement with the FCM or deposits money or securities (funds) with the FCM. Except as otherwise noted below, the information set out is as of September 24th, 2021 J.P. Morgan Securities LLC will update this information annually and as necessary to take account of any material change to its business operations, financial condition or other factors that J.P. Morgan Securities LLC believes may be material to a customer’s decision to do business with it. Nonetheless, the business and financial data of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC is not static and will change in non-material ways frequently throughout any 12-month period. NOTE: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“JPMorgan”) is a subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Information that may be material with respect to J.P. Morgan Securities LLC for purposes of the Commission’s disclosure requirements may not be material to JPMorgan Chase & Co. for purposes of applicable securities laws. FIRM AND ITS PRINCIPALS 1.55(k)(1) FCM’s name, address of its principal place of business, phone number, fax number and email address. • J.P. Morgan Securities LLC o Name – J.P. Morgan Securities LLC o Address – 383 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10179 o Phone number – 212-834-6271 or 212-270-6000 o Fax number – 212-622-0076 o Email – [email protected] 1.55(k)(6) FCM’s DSRO and DSRO’s website address • J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Leseprobe 9783791384900.Pdf
    NYC Walks — Guide to New Architecture JOHN HILL PHOTOGRAPHY BY PAVEL BENDOV Prestel Munich — London — New York BRONX 7 Columbia University and Barnard College 6 Columbus Circle QUEENS to Lincoln Center 5 57th Street, 10 River to River East River MANHATTAN by Ferry 3 High Line and Its Environs 4 Bowery Changing 2 West Side Living 8 Brooklyn 9 1 Bridge Park Car-free G Train Tour Lower Manhattan of Brooklyn BROOKLYN Contents 16 Introduction 21 1. Car-free Lower Manhattan 49 2. West Side Living 69 3. High Line and Its Environs 91 4. Bowery Changing 109 5. 57th Street, River to River QUEENS 125 6. Columbus Circle to Lincoln Center 143 7. Columbia University and Barnard College 161 8. Brooklyn Bridge Park 177 9. G Train Tour of Brooklyn 195 10. East River by Ferry 211 20 More Places to See 217 Acknowledgments BROOKLYN 2 West Side Living 2.75 MILES / 4.4 KM This tour starts at the southwest corner of Leonard and Church Streets in Tribeca and ends in the West Village overlooking a remnant of the elevated railway that was transformed into the High Line. Early last century, industrial piers stretched up the Hudson River from the Battery to the Upper West Side. Most respectable New Yorkers shied away from the working waterfront and therefore lived toward the middle of the island. But in today’s postindustrial Manhattan, the West Side is a highly desirable—and expensive— place, home to residential developments catering to the well-to-do who want to live close to the waterfront and its now recreational piers.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Are NYC's Most Active Developers?
    Who are NYC’s most active developers? The Real Deal ranked the top 10 December 27, 2018 | By Kathryn Brenzel and Kevin Sun The companies behind two mega-developments on Manhattan’s far West Side are the city’s busiest developers — and will likely remain so for the next few years. Related Companies and Brookfield Property Partners are the top two most active developers in the city in terms of the scale of their ongoing projects. Related and Brookfield are respectively being kept busy by their massive mixed-use proj- ects, Hudson Yards and Manhattan West. The Real Deal compiled a list of the city’s busiest developers of new construction, based on building permits issued by the Department of Buildings. Only projects with active permits that have not yet been issued a temporary certificate of occupancy (TCO) as of Dec.19 were included. Alterations were not included in developers’ total square footages or project counts. Here are the top 10 most active developers by square footage, as represented in DOB filings. 1. Related Companies Square footage: 6 million Number of projects: 9 Related’s largest ongoing project is 415 10th Avenue, better known as 50 Hudson Yards. The 2.2 million-square-foot office tower has been the target of multiple protests over the past year, due to the developer’s decision to use both union and nonunion construction labor on the project. Related’s second-largest ongoing project is another office tower at 550 West 34th Street, better known as 55 Hudson Yards. 2. Brookfield Property Partners Square footage: 4 million Number of projects: 4 Brookfield’s largest ongoing project is One Manhattan West, a 2 million-square–foot-plus office tower on Ninth Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Opportunities
    RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES DEANSGATE SQUARE 1 AN ICONIC DESTINATION The site is located southwest of the City in Castlefield, an established residential area with a range of converted warehouses, bars, restaurants and leisure offerings. Deansgate Square takes city centre living to a superior level. A ground-breaking development bringing new heights of style, luxury and sophistication to the heart of Manchester. Covering over 2.3 million sq ft, the Deansgate Square development comprises everything you could wish from contemporary city centre living. Boasting a pool, cinema, gym, spa, roof terrace garden and much, much more. 2 3 LOCAL AREA MANCHESTER d oa VICTORIA R am dh GUIDE Ol B la c k fr t ia tree rs Ring Road el S R ap o Ch a d EXCHANGE SQUARE SALFORD CENTRAL NEW A MANCHESTER t 3 ee 4 tr ARNDALE S BAILEY l il NORTHERN QUARTER M New Quay Street ld O These units are perfectly suited for a mixture of uses that Bri dge would cater not only for the residents of West Tower, St ree t 2 but also the densely populated surrounding areas. In 6 6 Home to some 350,000 employers, including 80 FTSE 100 A SPINNINGFIELDS addition to the scheme itself, over 2,750 high quality new L companies, Manchester is the fastest-growing property L t E e e P r t homes are being or have recently been built around this W i S c e R c r market in the UK and is experiencing a new era of capital I o a t d S R CHINA t i e l site making this area a great opportunity for potential E e l t V re Qu y investment due to increasing demand for residential, office I t ay a TOWN S tre g R S et s r e n occupiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiencing Liminality.Urban Identification, Renting, and Achieving Success Among the Newcomers in Astana, Kazakhstan
    Experiencing Liminality.Urban Identification, Renting, and Achieving Success among the Newcomers in Astana, Kazakhstan Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) eingereicht an der Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von MA Kishimjan Osmonova Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Olbertz Dekanin der Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät Prof. Dr. Julia von Blumenthal Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Ingeborg Baldauf 2. Dr. Manja Stephan-Emmrich Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 14.06.2016 Abstract: Kazakhstan, Astana, Migrants, Ethnography, City of the Future, Liminality The dissertation aims to answer the research question of what it means for various groups of individuals to live in Astana on a daily basis. As the new capital, Astana attracted a large number of internal migrants from various parts of Kazakhstan, who searched for better prospects and lives. Officially, the new capital is promoted by Kazakhstan’s government as “city of the future” and regards it as President Nazarbayev’s (1991-2019) most successful project. The dissertation offers an ethnographic contribution to urban experiences of migrants in Central Asia. The dissertation is divided into five main chapters. Chapter one offers an introduction to the theme and outlines major theoretical framework and the methodology on which the research is based. I apply the theory of the co-production of space (the social production and social construction of space) outlined by Setha Low to integrate the ‘spatial’ aspect as an integral part of my research. In addition, I employ the concept of liminality (Turner, 1967, Thomassen, 2014) as the central idea to analyze the stories of my informants.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Australia 108, Melbourne
    Case Study Australia 108, Melbourne CoxGomyl delivers a complete facade access solution for the tallest residential tower in Australia Australia 108 is the tallest residential tower in the Southern Hemisphere by height to the roof, surpassing Eureka Tower and Queensland’s Q1 Tower. The bold and imaginative design by Fender Katsalidis Architects, towers 320 metres and 100 stories over Melbourne’s famous Southbank precinct. Facts & Figures Beyond the sheer scale of the building, the complex aesthetic is inspired by the Commonwealth Star of the Australian flag with a unique golden ‘starburst’ feature projecting out from the slender, curving form of the tower across levels 69 to 72. Commencement 2020 The ambitious scale of the building and its complex geography required the Completion 2020 experience and expertise of CoxGomyl as market leaders in facade access solutions in order to ensure practical, reliable access coverage and safeguard Building Height 320m the well being of the tower for years into the future. The comprehensive building access system developed by the CoxGomyl Floor Count 100 team is made up of five Building Maintenance Units working in harmony to provide all of the required coverage and functionality. The first BMU is No. of BMUs 5 located in a fixed position at roof level which services the area from the top of the building to the bottom of the starburst feature. With a reach of nearly 34 metres and a system of mullion guides which allow operators to manoeuvre Outreach Up to 33.94m the cradle out from the main facade surface, this challenging feature is made conveniently accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • 111 West 57Th Street Retail Component Development Overview
    111 West 57th Street Retail Component Development overview By combining a modern tower with an existing landmark conversion, 111 West 57th Street offers a unique residential opportunity complimented by a 50,000 net square foot retail component. With rare frontage on both 57th and 58th Streets, the Project will create a dramatic street presence and benefit from its prime Midtown location at the epicenter of Manhattan’s premier international shopping, tourist, and commercial districts. Upon completion, 111 West 57th Street will rise over 1,400 feet, totaling approximately 446,000 gross square feet. The tower will have 45 full-floor residences, with 14 foot floor-to-ceiling windows offering sweeping views of Central Park. Most tower units will offer unobstructed 360- degree views of the world’s most iconic architectural achievements, from the Empire State Building to the Brooklyn Bridge to the south, Central Park to the north, both the East and Hudson Rivers and beyond. Interiors by world renowned Studio Sofield will provide an unparalleled level of sophistication and elegance throughout. Central to the Project’s design is its preservation of the landmarked Steinway Hall, a 17-story Beaux-Arts building designed by Warren & Wetmore. The Project will include the preservation and integration of the existing Steinway Hall façade as well as the restoration and renovation of its interior. The tower will be set back behind a transparent glass and bronze retail atrium built adjacent to Steinway Hall to showcase the Building’s original character, and provide a unique and historically sensitive juxtaposition of old and new design. Unparalleled design integration will be a hallmark inside and out as SHoP Architects designed a building that feels unique yet familiar to the New York City skyline.
    [Show full text]
  • Q1 2016 New York Office Outlook
    Office Outlook New York | Q1 2016 Vacancy moves higher as large blocks are added to the market • The Manhattan office market showed signs of caution in the first quarter of 2016 as vacancy moved higher and renewal activity increased. • While there have been concerns about slower expansion in the tech sector—as a result of a potential pullback in venture capital—the TAMI sector remained strong in Midtown South. • Investment sales activity slowed in the first quarter of the year after a strong 2015 with 120 sales totaling $12.3 billion, down nearly 20 percent year-over-year. JLL • Office Outlook • New York • Q1 2016 2 New York overview The Manhattan office market showed signs of caution in the first comprised the majority of leasing activity. McGraw Hill Financial Inc. quarter of 2016 as vacancy moved higher and renewal activity—rather renewed at 55 Water Street in Lower Manhattan for 900,027 square feet than relocations and expansions—captured the bulk of top in the largest lease of the quarter. Salesforce.com subleased 202,678 transactions. Manhattan Class A vacancy rose as several large blocks square feet at 1095 Avenue of the Americas in a transaction that were returned to the market. The vacancy rate for Midtown Class A included a provision to replace MetLife’s name atop the building with its space increased to 11.6 percent, up from 10.4 percent at year-end own, in full view of highly-trafficked Bryant Park. In Midtown South, 2015. Average asking rents were also higher as a result of newer and Facebook continued its massive expansion in a 200,668-square-foot higher quality product becoming available.
    [Show full text]