Traditional Retailers Vs Discounters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Traditional Retailers Vs Discounters COM0081-1 Teaching Note Retailing in Britain: Traditional Retailers vs Discounters Prerequisite Conceptual Understanding • Retail formats and their Different Features • Logistics Management (Finished Products) • Britain’s Retail Industry. Synopsis of the Case Study Early 19th century UK usually witnessed small, independent retailers selling a limited variety of products from their shops in various towns across the country. Changing social and income patterns caused by the Industrial Revolution, led to changes in the buying habits of the British. These changes led to innovations in retailing as competition increased, and the emergence of department store chains. Over a period of time, these chains developed their own distribution network system and marketing styles. By the late 20th century, foreign retailers and supermarkets forayed into the retail scenario, offering stiff competition to traditional retailers. Supermarkets, especially, were quite innovative about applying consumer behaviour theories to their marketing strategies. The traditional retailers had inherent weaknesses which reduced their overall profits and exposed them to the threat of being acquired by the bigger players. Market analysts were of the opinion that only those retailers who achieved large product volumes and leveraged on their economies of scale, would survive in such conditions. Teaching Objectives • To discuss the evolution of retailing industry in the UK • To discuss the differences between the marketing strategies of traditional British retailers, foreign retailers and supermarkets. Assignment Questions 1) What are the different retail formats? What are the characteristic features of each of these formats? 2) Discuss the evolution of the British retail industry till the late 19th century. What was the scenario in the British retail industry during the 20th century before the entry of foreign players? 3) How were the strategies of the foreign retailers different from those of the native British retailers? What were the factors responsible for the success of foreign retailers in the UK? This teaching note was written by Chiradeep Chatterjee, under the direction of Souvik Dhar, IBSCDC. It is only an illustrative orchestration of the case study ‘Retailing in Britain: Traditional Retailers vs Discounters’. It is never meant to limit the learning outcomes. © 2007, IBSCDC. No part of this publication may be copied, stored, transmitted, reproduced or distributed in any form or medium whatsoever without the permission of the copyright owner. COM0081-1 Teaching Note Retailing in Britain: Traditional Retailers vs Discounters 4) “By the 1990s, apart from the specialist foreign retailers, traditional British retailers had to encounter the domestic supermarkets.” (Page 4, para 2 of the case study). What significant shift in strategy did the supermarkets produce, and how did it influence consumer behaviour? Why did consumers favour the supermarkets? 5) The British retailers took a number of steps to meet the increasing competition from foreign players and supermarkets. However, it was opined that they would not be able to make a success of those strategies. What were the factors hindering the success of those strategies? Besides increasing competition from foreign retailers and supermarkets, which other factors contributed towards constant poor performance of the traditional retailers? 6) What was the threat most imminent to the survival of traditional retailers? What, according to most analysts, could be the way out for the traditional retailers? Teaching Plan Both the Teaching Note and the Structured Assignment follow the sequential order as presented in the chart [Annexure (TN)-I]. Case Study Analysis 1) What are the different retail formats? What are the characteristic features of each of these formats? A retail format is a term usually used to describe a common strategy in retailing. Supermarkets or hypermarkets are all retail formats. Such formats usually follow a conventional form of layout, display arrangement of merchandise, and service to customers. For example, megamarts or supermarkets follow a grid layout, display a variety of articles related to day-to-day usage, standard shelving, self-selection and limited service, centralised checkout at the front, and prices kept low through efficient inventory management and economy of scale. There are many common retail formats that exist throughout the world like – Farmer’s market (where farmers can directly sell their produce to consumers, eliminating in the process, various middlemen), Door-to-door, Department stores, Supermarkets, Convenience stores, Specialty stores, Discount stores, Kiosks, Hypermarkets, Superstores, Factory outlets, etc. Following is a brief explanation of some of the commonly found retail formats. • Mom-and-Pop – Represent the small, individually owned and operated retail outlets. In many cases these are family-run businesses catering to the local community. • Mass Discounters – These retailers can be either general or specialty merchandisers, but either way their main focus is on offering discount pricing. Compared to department stores, mass discounters offer fewer services and lower-quality products. • Warehouse Stores – This is a form of mass discounter that often provides lower prices compared to traditional mass discounters. In addition, they often require buyers to make purchases in quantities that are greater than what can be purchased at mass discount stores. These retail outlets provide few services and product selection can be limited. Furthermore, the retail design and layout is as the name suggests, warehouse style, with consumers often selecting products off the ground from the shipping package. Some forms of warehouse stores, called warehouse clubs or wholesale membership clubs, require customers to purchase membership in order to gain access to the outlet. 2 COM0081-1 Teaching Note Retailing in Britain: Traditional Retailers vs Discounters • Category Killers – Many major retail chains have taken over what were previously narrowly focused, small specialty store concepts, and have expanded them to create large specialty stores. These so-called ‘category killers’ have been found in such specialty areas as electronic items (for example, Best Buy), office supplies (for example, Staples) and sporting goods (for example, Sport Authority). • Department Stores – These retailers are general merchandisers offering mid-to-high qualityproducts and strong level of services, though in most cases these retailers do not fall into the full-service category. While department stores are classified as general merchandisers, some carry a more selective product line. For instance, while Sears carries a wide range of products from hardware to cosmetics, Nordstrom focuses on clothing and personal care products. • Boutique – This retail format is best represented by a small store carrying highly specialised and often high-end merchandise. In many cases a boutique is a full-service retailer following a full-pricing strategy. • Catalogue Retailers – Retailers such as Lands’ End and LL Bean have built their businesses by having customers place orders after seeing products that appear in a mailed catalogue. A third-party shipper then delivers orders. • e-tailers – Possibly the most publicised retail model to evolve during the last 50 years is the retailer that principally sells via the Internet. There are thousands of online retail sellers such as Amazon.com or eBay which are very popular. These retailers offer shopping convenience, including being open for business 24 hours. Electronic retailers or e-tailers also have the ability to offer a wide selection of products, since all they need in order to attract customers is a picture and description of the product, that is, they may not need to have the product on-hand the way physical stores do. Instead, an e-tailer can wait until an order is received from its customers before placing its own order with its suppliers. This cuts down significantly on the cost of maintaining products in stock. • Franchise –Afranchise is a form of contractual channel in which one party, the franchiser, controls the business activities of another party, the franchisee. Under such an arrangement, an eligible franchisee agrees to pay for the right to use the franchiser’s business methods and other important business aspects, such as the franchise name. For instance, McDonald’s is a well-known franchiser that allows individuals to use the McDonald’s name and methods to deliver food to consumers. Payment is usually in the form of a one-time, upfront franchise fee and also an on-going percentage of revenue. While the cost to the franchisee may be quite high, this form of retailing offers several advantages, including: (1) allowing the franchisee to open a retail outlet that may already be known to local customers, and (2) being trained in how to operate the business, which may allow the franchisee to be successful much faster than if he/she attempted to start a business on his/her own. For the franchiser, in addition to added revenue, the franchise model allows for faster expansion since funds needed to expand the business (for example, acquiring retail space, local advertising, etc) are often supported by the franchisee’s franchise fee. • Convenience – As the name suggests, these general merchandise retailers offer an easy purchase experience to customers. Convenience is offered in many ways, including through easily accessible store locations, small store size that
Recommended publications
  • The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
    YEARS 2003-2013 Issue 15 × 2013 September 28 - October 10 YOUR FREE COPY THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO LIFE, TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT IN ICELAND NEWS POLITICS FILM MUSIC TRAVEL Jóhanna The gender-based Lots and lots of Bam brings us We let fish suck on Sigurðardóttir wage gap widens :( RIFF! “Random Hero” our toes… SPEAKS! 5 year anniversary of the collapse 2008- 2013 THE MORE THINGS CHANGE, THE MORE THEY STAY THE SAME... Complete Lots of Download the FREE Grapevine Appy Hour app! Reykjavík Listings cool events Every happy hour in town in your pocket. + Available on the App store and on Android Market. The Reykjavík Grapevine Issue 15 — 2013 2 Editorial | Anna Andersen TRACK OF THE ISSUE ICELANDISTAN 5.0 Anna’s 32nd Editorial have wreaked more havoc on this country than land in the foreign media. anything that’s not directly caused by a natural So much emphasis has been put on this (only disaster. Our economy has been reduced to the possible) course of action that Icelanders them- standards of Eastern Europe at end of the Cold selves have perhaps forgotten what else the new War. As a nation, we are more or less bankrupt.” government has done to stem the rippling effects Almost overnight, our tiny island nation in the of the crash, not to mention all of the events that middle of the North Atlantic became the poster- led up to it. This would at least explain why Ice- child for the global economic crisis—a shiny ex- landers recently returned to power the very same ample of how to do everything wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaupthing Bank
    Kaupthing Bank - COMPANY UPDATE - HOLD Rating Summary and Conclusions Equity value 223,7 bn.ISK Kaupthing Bank acquires FIH Price 407,9 Kaupthing Bank (KB banki) has reached an agreement with Forenings Sparbanken (Swedbank) to Closing price 23.06.2004 429,5 purchase FI Holding, the holding company of the Danish corporate bank FIH. The purchase price amounts to ISK 84 billion (EUR 1,000 million), in addition to which Swedbank will retain part of Contents FIH's own equity. The acquisition will be financed with the issue of new share capital to holders of pre-emptive rights, as well as through subordinated debt. The price-to-book ratio for the Summary and Conclusions.........................................................1 transaction is 1.6. Kaupthing Bank acquires FIH....................................................2 Payment..................................................................................2 FIH is the third-largest bank in Danmark, with total assets close to ISK 800 bn at the end of Q1. It Financing.........................................................................2 was established in 1954 by the Danish state to encourage growth and development of Danish FIH...............................................................................................2 industry. FIH's activities are almost exclusively corporate lending. It holds a 17% share of the Danish Effect on group operations and value...................................3 corporate market and has around 5,000 customers, half of whom have been dealing with the
    [Show full text]
  • “Art Is in Our Heart”
    “ART IS IN OUR HEART”: TRANSNATIONAL COMPLEXITIES OF ART PROJECTS AND NEOLIBERAL GOVERNMENTALITY _____________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board _____________________________________________ in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________ By G.I Tinna Grétarsdóttir January, 2010 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Jay Ruby, Advisory Chair, Anthropology Dr. Raquel Romberg, Anthropology Dr. Paul Garrett, Anthropology Dr. Roderick Coover, External Member, Film and Media Arts, Temple University. i © Copyright 2010 by G.I Tinna Grétarsdóttir All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT “ART IS IN OUR HEART”: TRANSNATIONAL COMPLEXITIES OF ART PROJECTS AND NEOLIBERAL GOVERNMENTALITY By G.I Tinna Grétarsdóttir Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, January 2010 Doctoral Advisory Committee Chair: Dr. Jay Ruby In this dissertation I argue that art projects are sites of interconnected social spaces where the work of transnational practices, neoliberal politics and identity construction take place. At the same time, art projects are “nodal points” that provide entry and linkages between communities across the Atlantic. In this study, based on multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in Canada and Iceland, I explore this argument by examining ethnic networking between Icelandic-Canadians and the Icelandic state, which adopted neoliberal economic policies between 1991 and 2008. The neoliberal restructuring in Iceland was manifested in the implementation of programs of privatization and deregulation. The tidal wave of free trade, market rationality and expansions across national borders required re-imagined, nationalized accounts of Icelandic identity and society and reconfigurations of the margins of the Icelandic state. Through programs and a range of technologies, discourses, and practices, the Icelandic state worked to create enterprising, empowered, and creative subjects appropriate to the neoliberal project.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Encounter Chanel’S Mobile Art Mother Ship Has Landed in Central Park
    ▲ NEWS: ▲ Ann FASHION: ▲ RETAIL: Taylor Contemporary ▲ NEWS: Topshop taps brands Susan goes design, feel the Sokol bigger in store squeeze, to exit Tokyo, heads, page 9. Vera page 3. Wang, page 3. page 3. WWDWomen’s Wear Daily • TheTHURSDAY Retailers’ Daily Newspaper • October 16, 2008 • $3.00 Sportswear Close Encounter Chanel’s Mobile Art mother ship has landed in Central Park. The futuristic, Zaha Hadid-designed pavilion, which houses 18 modern artists’ odes to the iconic Chanel 2.55 handbag, will open to the public on Monday. For more on the installation, see pages 6 and 7. Bleak House: Retail Shares Dive Again as Outlook Darkens By David Moin and Evan Clark On a day marked by disappointments in which it has issued them, and the Credit jitters have given way to on several fronts, the Commerce weakness recently seen in retail shares holiday dread. Department reported declines in swept over the vendor community, led by The severity of the retail downturn nearly every category of retail sales in a nearly 30 percent drop in the price of was on full display Wednesday, in the September, including department and Jones Apparel Group Inc. shares. Jones process further depressing already specialty stores; the National Retail reduced its earnings estimates for the downtrodden stocks and anemic Federation issued its lowest forecast year after the market closed Tuesday. holiday expectations. for holiday spending in the seven years See More, Page 17 PHOTO BY TALAYA CENTENO TALAYA PHOTO BY WWD.COM WWDTHURSDAY Sportswear FASHION 6 Karl Lagerfeld and Zaha Hadid’s Space-Age spin ™ on portable structures, Chanel’s Mobile Art pavil- ion, has touched down in Central Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditional Voluntary Public Take-Over Offer
    CONDITIONAL VOLUNTARY PUBLIC TAKE-OVER OFFER on all Distribution Shares (coupon No. 20 and following attached) and all Capitalisation Shares issued by IMMO CROISSANCE Société d’investissement à capital variable (SICAV) incorporated under Luxembourg law Registered office: 69, route d’Esch L-1470 Luxembourg Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg Company Register of Luxembourg B 28872 by BAUGUR Group hf Registered Office : Túngötu 6 101 Reykjavik Iceland Register of Companies Fyrirtækjaskrá Ríkisskattstjóra: 480798-2289 ("BAUGUR") The terms of the Offer have been reviewed by the board of IMMO CROISSANCE at a meeting on 13 July, 2007. The following is the conclusion of the “avis motivé” of the board: Considering the foregoing, and that IMMO CROISSANCE has not received at the date of the present opinion other shows of interest in the form of a firm acquisition offer, the Board recommends to the shareholders to subscribe to the offer of BAUGUR. The full text of the “avis motivé” is reproduced as Annex 5 to this Prospectus. The “avis motivé” is circulated together with this Prospectus but has not been reviewed by nor approved by the CSSF. 1 Offer price: Per Capitalisation Share: a cash payment of EUR 926.16 Per Distribution Share (coupon No. 20 and following attached): a cash payment of EUR 329.15 Period: from 18 July 2007 to 31 August 2007 Centralising Agents: Banque Degroof in Belgium and Dexia Banque Internationale in Luxembourg Financial Intermediaries: In Belgium: Banque Degroof S.A., Tel: +32(2) 287 97 59 In the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg: Dexia Banque Internationale, Tel: +352 4590 4278 Investors are especially asked to refer to section 2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerfield Plc / Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc Inquiry
    Somerfield plc and Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc A report on the acquisition by Somerfield plc of 115 stores from Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc September 2005 Members of the Competition Commission who conducted this inquiry Christopher Clarke (Chairman of the Group) Nicholas Garthwaite Christopher Goodall Robert Turgoose Professor Stephen Wilks FCA Chief Executive and Secretary of the Competition Commission Martin Stanley Note by the Competition Commission The Competition Commission has excluded from this report information which the inquiry group considers should be excluded having regard to the three considerations set out in section 244 of the Enterprise Act 2002. The omissions are indicated by []. © Competition Commission 2005 Web site: www.competition-commission.org.uk The acquisition by Somerfield plc of 115 stores from Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc Contents Page Summary................................................................................................................................. 3 Findings .................................................................................................................................. 6 1. The reference.............................................................................................................. 6 2. The companies............................................................................................................ 6 The merger transaction ............................................................................................... 8 Rationale for the merger
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Industry Developments That Shaped the Decade
    10 industry developments that shaped the decade 23 December 2009 | Source: Joe Ayling Having delivered apparel and footwear industry news for the past decade, just-style takes a reflective look through its archives to highlight ten key themes that have helped shape the apparel industry over the last 10 years. view image 1. China quotas The defining moment for apparel sourcing came on 31 December 2004, when quotas between member countries of the World Trade Organization ( WTO ) were lifted. The measure was aimed at levelling the playing field for supplier countries, but a rapid drop in prices meant the EU and US dramatically increased their clothing imports from China. Faced with a surge in shipments from China, both the US and EU lost no time in making significant use of the textile special safeguard provision built into China's WTO accession agreement. While the US restrictions went without a hitch , a delay in application of the EU's plan to introduce a phased quota system limiting annual growth in Chinese textile and apparel imports resulted in 87m garments getting stuck in customs posts around the world - the so-called Bra Wars shambles . This was only resolved after new regulations were introduced to release the blocked products. 2. Sportswear battle The past decade has seen much consolidation in the sporting goods marketplace. The spending started in 2003, when Nike snapped up trendy pump producer Converse for US$305m. The footwear brand signalled a migration towards fashion for Nike. Two years later German firm Adidas Group snapped up Reebok for EUR3.1bn.
    [Show full text]
  • FL Group Reports Net Loss of ISK 67 Billion in 2007
    FL Group reports net loss of ISK 67 billion in 2007 -Global market conditions significantly affect Q4 earnings- - Financial position and fundamentals remain strong – -Market risk reduced significantly in Q4 and YTD 2008- Reykjavik, Iceland 13 February 2008 – FL Group (OMX: FL), the international investment company, today announces its results for the year 2007. Financial highlights • Net loss after tax of ISK 63.2 billion (EUR 694.5 million) in Q4 and ISK 67.3 billion (EUR 738.5 million) in 2007, reflecting a significant decrease in market value of FL Group’s listed assets. All of FL Group’s listed holdings are marked to market. • Total assets increased to ISK 422.3 billion at the end of Q4 from ISK 262.9 billion at the end of 2006, representing a 60.7% increase. Tryggingamidstodin was fully consolidated by the end of the year. • Total shareholders equity was ISK 155.8 billion at the end of the quarter, an increase of ISK 13.2 billion from the end of 2006. The increase was due to a share issue in the second half, related to the acquisitions of property companies and Tryggingamidstodin. • Financial position and liquidity are strong, equity ratio is 36.9% and direct liquidity of ISK 28.6 billion in the form of cash position and unpaid share capital which became payable on 4 January. • At the time of publishing the annual results, FL Group has refinanced ISK 47.1 billion of borrowings maturing in 2008, with only ISK 8.5 billion of borrowings currently remaining. • Negative re-valuation of ISK 3.7 billion of FL Group´s unlisted portfolio reflected global market conditions in Q4.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Offer Document Takeover Bid to Shareholders of Mosaic Fashions
    Official Offer Document Takeover bid to shareholders of Mosaic Fashions hf. I INTRODUCTION On 22 June 2007 an agreement was reached between F-Capital ehf., Kaupthing Bank hf., Gnupur fjarfestingafelag hf., Kevin Stanford, Karen Millen, The trustees of The Millen Life Interest Settlement, Don M Limited, Donald McCarthy, Tessera Holding ehf. and certain members of Mosaic Fashions hf.'s management team whose names are set out in Chapter III of this official offer document (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Consortium”) concerning the control and operation of Mosaic Fashions hf. The Consortium collectively owns 64.4% of the issued share capital of Mosaic Fashions hf. and controls 64.4% of the voting rights. Pursuant to Article 37 of Act No. 33/2003 on Securities Transactions (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) the agreement reached by the Consortium has resulted in the obligation on the part of the Consortium to make a mandatory takeover bid to the shareholders of Mosaic Fashions hf. (other than the members of the Consortium) to purchase the shares in Mosaic Fashions hf. held by such shareholders. Under the provisions of Chapters VI and VII of the Act the Consortium is therefore hereby making a mandatory takeover offer to Mosaic Fashions hf.'s shareholders (other than the members of the Consortium) of ISK 17.5 for each Mosaic Fashions hf. share subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this official offer document. II THE TARGET COMPANY The target company is Mosaic Fashions hf., Id. No. 550405-0320, Sudurlandsbraut 4, 108 Reykjavik, (hereinafter referred to as “Mosaic Fashions”).
    [Show full text]
  • Baugur Group Ársreikn 28.2.2003 Enskur
    Baugur Group hf. Financial Statements For the year ended February 28, 2003 Baugur Group hf. Túngata 6 101 Reykjavik Reg. no. 480798-2289 Contents Endorsement by the Board of Directors and the President ............................................. 3 Balance Sheet ..................................................... 7 Auditors’ Report ................................................ 5 Statement of Cash Flows .................................... 9 Statement of Earnings and Comprehensive Income .......................................................... 6 Notes to the Financial Statements ...................... 10 Financial Statements of Baugur Group hf. February 28, 2003 _____________________________________________ 2 _____________________________________________ Endorsement by the Board of Directors and the President The Financial Statements of Baugur Group hf. include the Parent Company’s Financial Statements and the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Parent Company and its subsidiaries, which were 17 at the end of the fiscal year. The Consolidated Financial Statements of Baugur Group hf. for the year ended February 28, 2003 have been prepared in accordance with the Icelandic Financial Statements Act and the Regulation on the Presentation and Contents of Financial Statements and have in all main respects been prepared in accordance with the same accounting principles as the Group’s Financial Statements for the previous year, except that now shares in listed companies are recorded at their market value and unrealized gain there on is entered as a separate item in the Statement of Earnings and Comprehensive Income and among Stockholders’ Equity in the Balance Sheet. Furthermore, expenses relating to stock option agreements are now expensed when they are incurred. Changes are further explained in the Notes to the Financial Statements. According to the Statement of Earnings and Comprehensive Income, the Group’s sales amounted to ISK 51,990 million for the year ended February 28, 2003 and the Parent Company’s sales amounted to ISK 29,611 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Government Interventions in Financial Markets Iceland
    26 May 2009 Summary of Government Interventions in Financial Markets Iceland Overview The Icelandic economy collapsed in the wake of the global financial meltdown. All four of its largest banks have now been nationalised and a USD 10bn relief package has been put together by the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) in conjunction with several European countries in an effort to rescue the State’s economy. In March 2009, there have been a number of reports indicating that Iceland may be put on a fast track to join the European Union in order to rescue the State from its financial collapse. This comes amid rising expectations that Iceland, which is already a member of the European Free Trade Association, will apply for full EU membership within months. EU membership, among other things, could allow Iceland to swap its hard-hit currency for the Euro. State guarantees On 7 October 2008, Iceland’s three main commercial banks, Kaupthing, Glitnir and Landsbanki, were nationalised. This was followed by the nationalisation of the investment bank Straumur-Burdaras on 9 March 2009. The Icelandic Financial Supervisory Authority (FME) took control of all four banks, guaranteeing all domestic deposits, pursuant to the Act on Depositors’ and Investors’ Guarantee Fund. Since then, a receivership committee has been appointed by the FME to all four banks, which has assumed the role of the board of directors to ensure continued operations. On 21 October 2008, the Central Bank of Iceland, Sedlabanki, announced that it would guarantee all payments which were routed through the Central Bank of Iceland would reach the account of the ultimate beneficiary.
    [Show full text]
  • BRINGING DOWN the BANKING SYSTEM This Page Intentionally Left Blank Bringing Down the Banking System Lessons from Iceland
    BRINGING DOWN THE BANKING SYSTEM This page intentionally left blank Bringing Down the Banking System Lessons from Iceland Gudrun Johnsen BRINGING DOWN THE BANKING SYSTEM Copyright © Gudrun Johnsen, 2014. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2014 978-1-137-35819-6 All rights reserved. Grateful acknowledgment is made for the permissions to reprint the following previously published images: (1) Figure (10.2) and Front Cover—Cross-ownership of fi rms with more than 500 million ISK in assets (Icel. Eignatengsl fyrirt æ kja me ð yfi r 500 millj ó nir kr ó na í eignir), SIC report, Appendix 2, Figure 6, (2) Figure 10.3—Cross-ownership of fi rms with more than 500 million ISK in assets, 10% minimum cross-ownership (Icel. Eignatengsl fyrirt æ kja me ð yfi r 500 millj ó nir í eignir, 10% l á marks eignatengsl), SIC report, Appendix 2, Figure 7, (3) Figure 10.4—Related parties with Baugur Group hf as the main party (Icel. Hópur tengdra aðila þegar Baugur Group hf er aðalaðili), SIC report, Appendix 2, Figure 15, (4) Figure 11.6—Total Lending to Baugur Group and related parties as percentage of capital base shown as a function of 2007 year-end minimum shareholding (Icel. Hlutfall heildarútlána Baugur Group og tendra aðila sem hlutfall af eiginfjárgrunni og sem fall af lágmarkseignarhlut við áramótin 2007/2008), SIC report, Appendix 2, Figure 30, previously published in Bjarnadottir and Hansen, 2010, “Investigation into the cross ownership and bank credit to related parties,” SIC Report, Volume 9 (Title in Icelandic: Ranns ó kn á krosseignartengslum og ú tl á num bankanna til tengdra a ð ila), Special Investigation Commission, Reykavik.
    [Show full text]