“Art Is in Our Heart”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
“ART IS IN OUR HEART”: TRANSNATIONAL COMPLEXITIES OF ART PROJECTS AND NEOLIBERAL GOVERNMENTALITY _____________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board _____________________________________________ in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________ By G.I Tinna Grétarsdóttir January, 2010 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Jay Ruby, Advisory Chair, Anthropology Dr. Raquel Romberg, Anthropology Dr. Paul Garrett, Anthropology Dr. Roderick Coover, External Member, Film and Media Arts, Temple University. i © Copyright 2010 by G.I Tinna Grétarsdóttir All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT “ART IS IN OUR HEART”: TRANSNATIONAL COMPLEXITIES OF ART PROJECTS AND NEOLIBERAL GOVERNMENTALITY By G.I Tinna Grétarsdóttir Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, January 2010 Doctoral Advisory Committee Chair: Dr. Jay Ruby In this dissertation I argue that art projects are sites of interconnected social spaces where the work of transnational practices, neoliberal politics and identity construction take place. At the same time, art projects are “nodal points” that provide entry and linkages between communities across the Atlantic. In this study, based on multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in Canada and Iceland, I explore this argument by examining ethnic networking between Icelandic-Canadians and the Icelandic state, which adopted neoliberal economic policies between 1991 and 2008. The neoliberal restructuring in Iceland was manifested in the implementation of programs of privatization and deregulation. The tidal wave of free trade, market rationality and expansions across national borders required re-imagined, nationalized accounts of Icelandic identity and society and reconfigurations of the margins of the Icelandic state. Through programs and a range of technologies, discourses, and practices, the Icelandic state worked to create enterprising, empowered, and creative subjects appropriate to the neoliberal project. At the same time these processes and practices served as tools for reawakening and revitalizing ethnic networking on a iii transnational scale. As enactments of programs initiated by the Icelandic state, the art projects studied here are approached in relation to neoliberal governmentality in a transnational context in order to explore how the operations of states and the new global economy are translated into local cultural practices, such as visual displays. This is a study of cultural circuits and transnational networking where art projects are the formative “nodes”–local sites of cultural production, neoliberal politics, multiple threads of truth claims in battles of cultural politics, identity formation, and conflicted notions of the value of art and the idea of creativity. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to acknowledge the vital support of my mother, Ragnheiður Guðnadóttir and my stepfather Hlynur Ingimarsson. They have been instrumental in keeping me afloat throughout the years that I have undertaken this study. I also want to thank Dr. Birna Bjarnadóttir, Chair of the Icelandic department at the University of Manitoba, for making it possible to stay legally in Canada and for being an inspiration at countless meetings, formal and informal. Dr. Jay Ruby, professor emeritus, gave me the suggestion to think about Icelandic-Canadians and their relationship to Icelandic authorities and has been extremely supportive during my studies. Dr. Jayasinhi Jhala, professor at Temple, has been an inspiring friend and supporter during my studies. Dr. Denise O’Brien, professor at Temple, was another friend who passed away much too soon. I want to thank them for their guidance and support. Dr. Raquel Romberg, assistant professor (teaching) and adjunct graduate faculty member at Temple University, has been very helpful and inspiring during this process. Raquel’s interest, shared knowledge and encouragement throughout the years have been of great value. I would also like to thank Dr. Paul B. Garrett, associate professor in Anthropology, Temple University, and Roderick Coover, associate professor of Film and Media arts, Temple University, for their interest in my work and for joining my committee. Professor Gísli Pálsson, at the department of Anthropology, University of Iceland, has been a support and inspiration throughout my studies at the University of Iceland and Temple University. Dr. Arnar Árnason, associate professor in Anthropology at the University of Aberdeen, is a (theoretical) partner in crime when it comes to this project but my work v with him in Iceland has convinced me of the importance of framing cultural practice within a political economic perspective. Throughout the project he has made comments and suggestions that have been extremely helpful in thinking this through. This study would not have been possible without the people in Canada and Iceland that allowed me into their lives and agreed to meet me and share information. The list of people is too large to mention but I want to thank the people in the Icelandic community in Manitoba, Alberta, Ontario and British Columbia for their hospitality, friendship and support. The dissertation has also benefitted from my many conversations with Icelandic artists who are too numerous to name here. In particular, I want to thank Sigrid Johnson at the Icelandic Collection at the University of Manitoba for her interest in my work. Discussions with Icelandic-Canadians Ryan Eyford and Laurie Bertham, also pursuing research on the Icelandic community, were inspiring and thought provoking. I am also grateful to Karen Jantzi who corrected my English text with patience and insight. This dissertation also benefitted from Stas Shectman and Jay Gabriel who read individual chapters. I began this journey alone but along the way I partnered with Sigurjón B. Hafsteinsson, also an anthropologist, and “adopted” his two amazing girls, Snjólaug and Hildur Erna, who were also a source of inspiration and new stimuli during this journey. I gave birth to our two wonderful daughters during my studies, Ragnheiður Kolka, who was born in 2003, and Æsa Margrét, born in 2007. They have added a deeper understanding of what continuity, tradition and change mean under transnational conditions but this journey took place in three different countries, the US, Canada and Iceland–away from the larger family network. My partner, Sigurjón, who has been at my vi side throughout this journey, has been an endless resource for my work. Sigurjón opened new experiences and ways of thinking not just within the field of anthropology but in life. His engagement is reflected in every chapter of this dissertation. The research and thesis work was made possible through financial support from Fulbright, Temple University, and The Icelandic Center for Research (Rannís) for which I am most grateful. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................x Chapters 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………..1 Visual Anthropology and Anthropology of Transnationalism: Combining Fields, Expanding and Exploring New Avenues Within Both Traditions……. 6 Situate the Field: Mapping Out the Icelandic Canadian Community……….. 12 “Waking the Giant”: The Scope of the Transnational Project.........................26 “What is your Agenda Girl?” – Research Methods and Stories of Access .....40 “Western Icelander? – NOT ME” or “The Importance of Being Icelandic”...51 Conclusion .......................................................................................................61 2. TRANSNATIONAL COMPLEXITIES OF ART PROJECTS: NETWORK- ING AND NEOLIBERAL GOVERNMENTALITY .....................................65 Transnationalism and Communities ................................................................69 Globalization and Governmentality.................................................................82 “Hacking Away the Hyphen Between the Nation and the State”....................90 The Anthropology of Art .................................................................................95 Conclusion .......................................................................................................99 3. STRETCHING THE MARGINS OF THE STATE AND RECREATING (TRANS)NATIONAL IMAGINARY NARRATIVE ..................................102 Reconfiguring the Margins ............................................................................106 Útrás: Structural Expressions and Narratives of Nationhood. Mediating the Local and Global: The National and The International. Icelanders and the Icelandic Canadians ......................................................................................112 Weaving the Ties: Producing Cultural Practices and Identities in Canada ...125 Conclusion .....................................................................................................137 4. SCULPTING TRANSNATIONAL PRACTICES. .......................................144 Sculpting the Millennium ..............................................................................147 Unveiling Transnational Politics....................................................................158 Eurocentric “Fuss in Party Halls”..................................................................171