Lessons for Europe from the 2008 Icelandic Bank Collapse

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lessons for Europe from the 2008 Icelandic Bank Collapse LESSONS FOR EUROPE FROM THE 2008 ICELANDIC BANK COLLAPSE HANNES H. GISSURARSON www.europeanreform.org @europeanreform Established by Margaret Thatcher, New Direction is Europe’s leading free market political foundation & publisher with offices in Brussels, London, Rome & Warsaw. New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. REGISTERED OFFICE: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Naweed Khan. www.europeanreform.org @europeanreform The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication. Sole liability rests with the author. AUTHOR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 IMPLAUSIBLE NARRATIVES ON THE COLLAPSE 8 3 DID THE CENTRAL BANK FAIL? 14 4 THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION 21 5 A PROBLEMATIC REPORT 28 Hannes Holmsteinn Gissurarson 6 THE ROLE OF EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANKS 39 Born in 1953, he holds a D.Phil. in Politics from 7 THE US FED REFUSES TO HELP 49 Oxford University and is Professor of Politics at 8 THE CLOSE-DOWN OF ICELANDIC BANKS IN THE UK 59 the University of Iceland. The author of more than a dozen books on political philosophy, 9 THE USE OF AN ANTI-TERRORIST ACT AGAINST ICELAND 74 history and current affairs, he is the research 10 FIVE LESSONS FROM THE ICELANDIC BANK COLLAPSE 85 director of RNH, the Icelandic Research Centre SOME BOOKS IN ENGLISH ABOUT THE COLLAPSE 93 for Innovation and Economic Growth. New Direction - The Foundation for European Reform www.europeanreform.org @europeanreform Lessons for Europe from the 2008 Icelandic bank collapse Hannes H. Gissurarson later, one of the three major Icelandic banks, Glitnir, The bank collapse came as a shock to the Icelanders, and 1 reached the conclusion that it would be unable to at the end of 2008, a Special Investigation Commission meet forthcoming obligations and, therefore, asked (SIC) was appointed to find out what had happened. for a €600 million emergency loan from the CBI. But some did not want to wait for its report, and after INTRODUCTION unprecedented street riots for weeks, the Social Instead of extending an emergency Democrats turned their back on their loan to Glitnir against a less coalition partner and formed a minority than solid collateral offered, government on 1 February 2009 he 2008 Icelandic bank collapse was agenda of liberalising the economy. He remained the CBI advised that the with the Left Greens. They called spectacular. Iceland, a prosperous, peaceful Prime Minister until 2004, becoming Foreign Minister government would buy for new elections, in which the T but tiny Nordic country suddenly found for a year, after which he was appointed Chairman 75% in the bank for €600 two parties won a huge victory, herself under siege, first from hedge funds, and then of the Board of Governors at the Central Bank of million, in the hope of while the Independence Party from her neighbours and long-time allies who not Iceland (CBI). The privatisation of the banks was calming the international suffered a debacle. The first only denied liquidity help to her struggling banks in completed in 2003. The new owners hired young and markets. It could not have action taken by the minority the international financial crisis of 2007 and 2009, ambitious managers who hit on a singularly fortuitous chosen a worse time. On government was to drive but also invoked an Anti-Terrorism Act against her, moment: the financial markets were full to the brim Monday 29 September, Oddsson and his two colleagues putting her in the same category as the Taliban, of cheap money, and in addition Iceland, as a result when the recapitalisation out of the CBI. The SIC presented Al-Qaida, Sudan and North Korea. In the course of prudent fiscal and monetary policies since 1991, of Glitnir was announced, the its report in 2010, assigning blame of three days, 6–8 October 2008, all three major enjoyed a good reputation internationally. This implied international credit crunch had to three government ministers, Prime Icelandic banks fell. Icelanders were not even sure good credit ratings for the Icelandic Treasury and turned into a major financial crisis Minister Haarde, Finance Minister Arni M. whether they would be able to import vital food improved the credit ratings for the newly privatised with banks all around the world on the Mathiesen and Business Affairs Minister Bjorgvin and medicine. To add insult to injury, the British banks. Consequently, from 2004 to 2005 the bank brink of collapsing and governments hastily pumping G. Sigurdsson, the three CBI governors and the director and Dutch governments, with the connivance of managers and their major customers among Icelandic money into their economies. Credit lines to the Icelandic of the IFSA.3 On the basis of the SIC report, a narrow the other Nordic countries, were able to prevent all businessmen started a major expansion abroad, banks were cancelled, and a run started on deposits. majority in Parliament decided to charge Haarde alone assistance from the International Monetary Fund borrowing money in financial markets and lending it The CBI, under Oddsson’s leadership, advised ‘ring- with negligence. Eventually he was acquitted of all major (IMF) unless the Icelandic Treasury guaranteed to Icelandic businessmen for foreign investments. fencing’ the Icelandic economy – as illustrated on this charges but found guilty of a technicality: that he had the obligations of the Icelandic Depositors’ and page – and transferring the domestic operations of not put the impending banking crisis on the agenda of Investors’ Guarantee Fund (IDIGF), at the time Early warnings that the Icelandic banks might get into the banks, both deposits and assets, to new banks, cabinet meetings. estimated to be an enormous financial liability, difficulties were heard in late 2005. It was pointed out putting the foreign part into resolution if necessary.2 probably locking Iceland in a debt prison for that it would be beyond the capacities of both the The government hesitated for a few days, as the Social The case against Haarde was widely regarded as decades. The Icelandic government reluctantly CBI and the Icelandic Treasury to rescue them in the Democrats, the junior partner in a coalition presided grossly unfair, and after the two left-wing government bowed to pressure, but in two referenda Icelandic case of a credit crunch. The banks suffered a setback over by the Independence Party leader, Geir H. Haarde, parties suffered a heavy defeat in 2013, a new voters rejected deals based on the British and Dutch in early 2006, not least as a result of negative reports were reluctant to adopt Oddsson’s proposal. Finally they coalition government of the Independence Party and demands, and in 2013 Iceland won her case before and the common perception of their vulnerability. But went along with it. An ‘Emergency Act’ was passed by the Progressive Party appointed Haarde as Iceland’s the EFTA Court. No less spectacular has been the while they did no longer enjoy easy credit in European Parliament on 6 October, giving the Icelandic Financial Ambassador to the United States. Mathiesen had by rapid Icelandic recovery. In 2017 Iceland again joined markets, they were able to continue expanding by Supervisory Authority (IFSA) full authority to take over then become Assistant-Director General of the Food the ranks of the world’s most prosperous countries, selling bonds in the United States, by obtaining credit banks and making claims by depositors priority claims and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the highest with a flourishing economy and profitable new banks from the European Central Bank (ECB) through their on the estates of the banks which were now falling position an Icelander has occupied in international established on the ruins of the failed ones. Luxembourg subsidiaries and by starting to collect by the day: Landsbanki in the evening of 6 October, organisations, while Oddsson had become editor of deposits in various countries, most importantly in Glitnir in the evening of 7 October and Kaupthing in the Morgunbladid, a leading newspaper and the Icelandic The saga of the bank collapse was short, but eventful.1 the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. This made evening of 8 October. There had been a weak glimmer ‘journal of record’. But still the debate rages in Iceland In 1991 the Independence Party leader, David Oddsson, them, however, unpopular in European central bank of hope that Kaupthing, the largest bank, would survive, over the causes and consequences of the bank had formed his first government with the explicit circles. And when the international credit crunch but when the British Labour government closed down collapse. Perhaps there are some lessons to be drawn started in August 2007, they found it difficult to its London subsidiary KSF in the early afternoon of 8 for Europe from this Icelandic saga. refinance themselves. In vain the CBI tried to make October, it triggered loan covenants and brought about currency swap deals with European central banks the fall of the Icelandic parent company. 1 In the following report I draw on a report I finished in 2017 for the Icelandic Ministry of Finance on foreign factors in the Icelandic bank (except the three Scandinavian central banks) and the 3 Pall Hreinsson, Sigridur Benediktsdottir and Tryggvi Gunnarsson, collapse. I also have to declare an interest: I was, and remain, Oddsson’s US Federal Reserve Board. The death knell sounded Skyrsla rannsoknarnefndar Althingis um addraganda og orsakir falls friend, and I often advised him during his tenure as Prime Minister. I was islensku bankanna 2008 [Report of the Special Investigation Commission a member of the Board of Overseers of the CBI from 2001 to 2009. But on 24 September 2008, when the US Federal Reserve of Parliament on Events Leading Up to and Causes of the Icelandic Bank what is important is not the affiliation of the author, but the strength of his Collapse] (Reykjavik: Althingi, 2010).
Recommended publications
  • Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit-Guarantee Schemes – Obligation of Result – Emanation of the State – Discrimination)
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 28 January 2013 (Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes – Obligation of result – Emanation of the State – Discrimination) In Case E-16/11, EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Xavier Lewis, Director, and Gjermund Mathisen, Officer, Department of Legal & Executive Affairs, acting as Agents, applicant, supported by the European Commission, represented by its Agents Enrico Traversa, Albert Nijenhuis and Karl-Philipp Wojcik, intervener, v Iceland, represented by Kristján Andri Stefánsson, Agent, Tim Ward QC, Lead counsel, Jóhannes Karl Sveinsson, Co-counsel, defendant, APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing to ensure payment of the minimum amount of compensation to Icesave depositors in the Netherlands and in the United Kingdom provided for in Article 7(1) of the Act referred to at point 19a of Annex IX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes) within the time limits laid down in Article 10 of the Act, Iceland has failed to comply with the obligations resulting from that Act, in particular its Articles 3, 4, 7 and 10, and/or Article 4 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area. – 2 – THE COURT, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge Rapporteur, Páll Hreinsson, and Ola Mestad (ad hoc), Judges, Registrar: Gunnar Selvik, - having regard to the written pleadings of the parties and the intervener and the written observations of the Principality of Liechtenstein, represented
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland's Financial Crisis
    Iceland’s Financial Crisis A Global Crisis • The current economic turmoil in Iceland is part of a complex global financial crisis and is by no means an isolated event. • Governments around the world have introduced emergency measures to protect their financial system and rescue their banks, as they suffer from a severe liquidity shortage. • Thus far, Iceland has been hit particularly hard by this unprecedented financial storm due to the large size of the banking sector in comparison to the overall economy. • The Icelandic Government has taken measures and is working hard to resolve the situation, both independently and in cooperation with other parties. • Iceland is cooperating with its Nordic and European partners and is currently consulting with the IMF on measures toward further stabilization of the Icelandic economy. 1 Bank Liquidity Tightens • The liquidity position of Icelandic banks tightened significantly in late September and early October as interbank markets froze following the collapse of Lehman Brothers. • The nationalization of Glitnir, one of Iceland’s three major banks, on Sept. 29 th , led to a credit rating downgrade on sovereign debt and that of all the major banks. • This led to further deterioration of liquidity. • Early October, all three banks were suffering from a severe liquidity shortage and in dire need for Central Bank emergency funding. Negative coverage on the Icelandic economy, particularly in the U.K, did not help either. • By mid-October, all three banks, Glitnir, Landsbanki and Kaupthing, had been taken over by the government on the basis of a new emergency law. • The banks had become too large to rescue.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaupthing Bank Hf. Creditors' Report 5 February 2009 Update March 2009
    KAUPTHING BANK HF. CREDITORS' REPORT 5 FEBRUARY 2009 UPDATE MARCH 2009 Disclaimer This report (including all subsequent amendments and additions) was prepared by the Resolution Committee for the creditors of Kaupthing Bank hf. ("the Bank") for information purposes only. It should give creditors an overview of the background, the current situation and the potential steps going forward. The additions and amendments to this report since the previously published versions of this report are intended to give the creditors information on recent developments but are not necessarily and should not be regarded as an exhaustive list of all developments which creditors may consider material. In preparing and updating this report, the Bank has not taken account of the interest of any particular creditor or group of creditors. Where information in this report is based on information from third parties the Bank believes such sources to be reliable. The Bank however accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of its sources. Furthermore, without prejudice to liability for fraud, the Bank accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this report and, without limitation to the foregoing, disclaims any liability which may be based on the accuracy or completeness of this report. The Bank is under no obligation to make amendments or changes to this publication if errors are found or opinions or information change. The fact that the Bank has made certain additions and amendments does not create any obligation on the Bank to make amendments or changes to this publication in respect of any other developments, errors or changes in opinion or information, regardless of whether such development or changes occur after or before the date of publication of the revised report.
    [Show full text]
  • Alma's Good Trip Mikko Joensuu in Holy Water Hippie Queen of Design Frank Ocean of Love Secret Ingredients T H Is Is T H E M
    FLOW MAGAZINE THIS IS THE MAGAZINE OF FLOW FESTIVAL. FESTIVAL. FLOW OF IS THE MAGAZINE THIS ALMA'S GOOD TRIP MIKKO JOENSUU IN HOLY WATER HIPPIE QUEEN OF DESIGN FRANK OCEAN OF LOVE SECRET INGREDIENTS F entrance L 7 OW F L O W the new This is 1 to 0 2 2 0 1 7 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6–9 12–13 18–21 36–37 Editor 7 7 W Tero Kartastenpää POOL OF ALMA Alma: ”We never really traveled when we were Art Director little. Our parents are both on disability Double Happiness pension and we didn’t IN SHORT have loads of money. Swimming with a Whenever our classmates Designers singer-songwriter. traveled to Thailand Featuring Mikko MINT MYSTERY SOLVED or Tenerife for winter Viivi Prokofjev SHH Joensuu. holidays we took a cruise AIGHT, LOOK to Tallinn. When me and Antti Grundstén 22–27 Anna turned eighteen we Frank Ocean sings about Robynne Redgrave traveled to London with love and God and God and our friends. We stayed for love. Here's what you didn’t five days, drunk.” 40–41 Subeditor know about alt-country star Ryan Adams. Aurora Rämö Alma went to L.A. and 14–15 met everybody. Publisher 34–37 O The design hippie Laura Flow Festival Ltd. 1 1 Väinölä creates a flower ALWAYS altar for yoga people. Lana Del Rey’s American Contributors nightmares, plant cutting 30–33 Hanna Anonen craze, the smallest talk etc. The most quiet places OCEAN OF TWO LOVES Maija Astikainen from abandoned villas to Pauliina Holma Balloon stage finds new UNKNOWN forgotten museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Political and Criminal Responsibility Separate
    Declassified AS/Jur (2012) 28 declassified 25 September 2012 ajdoc28 2012 declassified Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Keeping political and criminal responsibility separate Information memorandum on the case of Geir Haarde, former Prime ∗∗∗ Minister of Iceland Rapporteur: Pieter Omtzigt, Netherlands, Group of the European People’s Party 1. Introduction 1. As indicated in the Introductory Memorandum, 1 the case of former Icelandic Prime Minister Geir Haarde is arguably one of those cases from which lessons can be drawn for keeping political and criminal responsibility separate. 2. My fact-finding visit to Iceland from 6-9 May 2012 was very instructive, and I should like to reiterate my thanks to the Icelandic delegation for its hospitality and the efficient organisation of the visit. As indicated at the Committee meeting on 21 May 2012 in Paris, I should like to present my findings on the Icelandic case in the form of this information memorandum. I will begin by summing up the facts of this case (2.) and presenting the interpretation they have been given by the two sides of the dispute (3.), and conclude by offering my own assessment, in the light of the information and views provided by our legal experts, Professor Satzger from Munich and Professor Verheij from Leiden. 2. Summary of the facts of the case of former Prime Minister Geir Haarde 3. Iceland suffered a severe economic setback in 2008/2009 in the wake of the world-wide banking crisis triggered by the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in the United States. The situation in Iceland was worse than in other countries in that the Icelandic banks in crisis (Landsbanki, Kaupthing and Glitnir) were far larger, in proportion to the country’s GDP, than those elsewhere, 2 during the same world-wide financial crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riksbank's Measures During the Global Financial Crisis 2007-2010
    The Riksbank’s measures during the global financial crisis 2007-2010 Riksbank Study, February 2020 KÄNSLIG THE RIKSBANK’S MEASURES DURING THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS 2007-2010 3 Contents FOREWORD 4 INTRODUCTION 5 1. THE SWEDISH FINANCIAL SYSTEM WAS SENSITIVE TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS 7 2. THE CRISIS SPREAD TO SWEDEN 9 3. THE ROLE OF THE RIKSBANK IS TO MAINTAIN PRICE STABILITY, AND TO PROMOTE A SAFE AND EFFICIENT PAYMENT SYSTEM 12 4. THE RIKSBANK EMPLOYED SEVERAL TOOLS DURING THE CRISIS 14 Extraordinary liquidity provisioning 15 Emergency liquidity assistance to specific institutions 22 Swap lines to other central banks 25 5. LESSONS FROM THE CRISIS HAVE SERVED TO STRENGTHEN THE RIKSBANK’S CRISIS PREPAREDNESS 28 REFERENCES 32 ANNEX A. USD LENDING AUCTIONS 34 ANNEX B. SEK LENDING AUCTIONS 35 ANNEX C. PRESS RELEASES 38 4 THE RIKSBANK’S MEASURES DURING THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS 2007-2010 Foreword This Riksbank Study describes the measures taken during the global financial crisis 2007- 2010, when the Riksbank provided the Swedish banking system with extraordinary loans, provided emergency liquidity assistance to specific institutions, and limited crisis contagion through swap lines to neighbouring countries. The study complements previously published work on how the Riksbank handled the crisis, by providing a chronological account of the series of events that unfolded in 2007- 2010 and the corresponding Riksbank action. The study also outlines the lessons that the Riksbank learned from the crisis, and how these have served to strengthen our crisis preparedness. The purpose of the study is to contribute to ongoing international initiatives to document case studies from actual financial crises.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Financial Crisis: the Case of Iceland – Are There Lessons to Be Learnt?
    248 THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THE CASE OF ICELAND – ARE THERE LESSONS TO BE LEARNT? Jón Baldvin Hannibalsson PALKANSAAJIEN TUTKIMUSLAITOS · TYÖPAPEREITA LABOUR INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH · DISCUSSION PAPERS 248 The International Financial Crisis: THE CASE OF ICELAND - Are there Lessons to be Learnt?* Jón Baldvin Hannibalsson** *) The text of this working-paper is an elaborated version of a lecture given by the author at a seminar held by the Faculty of Law and Economics of the Friedrich Schiller University at Jena in Türingen in Germany November 27, 2008. The text has been revised to bring it up to date as of end of year 2008. **) Former Minister of Finance and Minister for Foreign Affairs and External Trade of Iceland. The author studied economics and related subjects at the Universities of Edinburgh and Stockholm 1958-1963 and was a Fulbright scholar at Harvard 1976-1977. During his career he has been an educator, journalist and editor of a newspaper. He was a member of Althingi 1982-1998, a leader of the Social-democratic party 1984- 1996; a Minister of Finance 1987-88 and Minister for Foreign Affairs and External Trade 1988-1995. He led Iceland´s negotiations with the EU on the European Economic Area (EEA) 1989-1994. In the years 1998- 2006 he served as Ambassador of Iceland in Washington D.C. and in Helsinki, also accredited to the Baltic Countries. Since then he has been a visiting scholar and a guest lecturer at several universities at home and abroad. He is an honorary citizen of Vilnius, Lithuania. Helsinki 2009 ISBN 978-952-209-065-2 ISSN 1795-1801 Friedrich Schiller University Faculty of Law and Economics The International Financial Crisis: THE CASE OF ICELAND Are there Lessons to be Learnt? By Jón Baldvin Hannibalsson, Former Minister of Finance and Minister for Foreign Affairs and External Trade of Iceland Table of contents: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DOMESTIC RATS, FLEAS and NATIVE RODENTS
    DOMESTIC RATS, FLEAS and NATIVE RODENTS In Relation To Plague In The United States By Entomologist Carl 0. Mohr INTRODUCTION and finally to the lungs causing pneumonic plague. ubonic plague is a rodent and rodent - Pneumonic plague is extremely fatal and flea disease caused by the plague bacil­ highly infectious when sputum droplets pass Blus Pasturella pest is which is transmitted direct from person to person. The death from animal to animal and thence to man by rate due to it is practically 100 percent. fleas. It is highly fatal. At least half Plague is dreaded particularly where of the human cases result in death without living conditions are such as to bring modern medication. (Table I — last two human beings into close contact with large columns). Because of their close associa* oriental-rat-flea populations, and where tion with man, domestic rats* and their crowded conditions permit rapid pneumonic fleas, especially the oriental rat flea transmission from man to man. Xenopsylla cheopis, are responsible for most human epidemics. Only occasional cases ANCIENT AMERICAN DISEASE OR RECENT are caused by bites of other fleas or by INTRODUCTION direct infection from handling rodents. Infection due to bites of fleas or due to Two widely different views exist con­ direct contact commonly results in swollen cerning the arrival of plague in North lymph glands, called buboes, hence the name America. The prevalent view is that it was bubonic plague. Infection may progress to introduced from the Orient into North the blood stream causing septicemic plague, America at San Francisco through ship- * Rattus rattus and Rattus norvegicus.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribune ABN AMRO Prof. Smits
    Tribune ABN AMRO: A TAKE-OVER BATTLE WITH FAR-REACHING IMPLICATIONS PROFESSOR DR. RENÉ SMITS JEAN MONNET CHAIR , LAW OF THE ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION , UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM , AMSTERDAM (NL) VISITING PROFESSORIAL FELLOW , CENTRE FOR COMMERCIAL LAW STUDIES , QUEEN MARY , UNIVERSITY OF LONDON , LONDON (GB) CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL , NEDERLANDSE MEDEDINGINGSAUTORITEIT (N ETHERLANDS COMPETITION AUTHORITY ), THE HAGUE (NL) Last year saw the advent of a truly integrated European banking market coming one step closer with the takeover by a consortium of three banks, Banco Santander Central Hispano (BSCH) of Spain, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and Belgian/Dutch Fortis, of a major European bank, ABN AMRO. This came after increased consolidation and cross-border M&A activity, such as the takeover of HypoVereinsbank by UniCredit in 2004, forming a major player in Germany, Austria and Italy, and the takeover of British mortgage lender Abbey by BSCH in 2005. ABN Amro itself had waged a major takeover battle for the Italian bank Banco Antonveneta, which it finally acquired in 2005 as a major cross-border inroad into the (then) closed Italian banking sector. The pace of market developments is so quick that, just when the takeover bid was sealed for ABN AMRO itself, new European legislation was adopted that had been inspired by ABN Amro's own adventures in Italy 1. This legislation 2 seeks to streamline the assessment of shareholders in financial sector entities on prudential grounds 3. The EC Merger Regulation 4 lays down the rules for a competition assessment above certain thresholds. It contains a prudential carve-out in Article 21 (4) that I consider not to be in line with the requirements of an internal market where national considerations of a prudential nature no longer hold, certainly after the Prudential Assessment of Acquisitions (Financial Sector) Directive just mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Small States and Big Banks – the Case of Iceland
    31 Small states and big banks – the case of Iceland Hilmar Þór Hilmarsson1 Abstract The Icelandic economy was hit hard by the global economic and financial crisis that started in the fall of 2008. During this crisis the three largest banks all collapsed and many other smaller banks and companies went bankrupt in the aftermath of the crisis with severe consequences for the economy and the people. Prior to the crisis, Iceland, a high income economy, had experienced strong growth rates and unprecedented expansion in overseas investment and activities, especially in the financial sector. This article focuses on action by top government officials during this expansion as well as during and after the collapse of the Icelandic banks. The findings of the study are that the government showed negligence and made mistakes by not taking credible action to manage risks following a rapid cross border expansion of the Icelandic banking system. This had severe consequences and resulted in the collapse of the Icelandic economy in October 2008. The discussion can have a wider relevance than that for Iceland only. This is especially true for small countries with a large banking sector, using their own currency, and with limited fiscal space to support their banks during a crisis. Keywords: Economic and financial crisis, economic policy, international expansion of firms, risk management. JEL Classification: F21, G32, H12 1. Introduction The Icelandic economy was hit hard by the global economic and financial crisis that start- ed in the fall of 2008. During this crisis the three largest banks (Glitnir, Kaupthing, and Landsbanki)2 all collapsed and many other smaller banks and companies went bankrupt in the aftermath of the crisis with severe consequences for the economy and the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland's Contested European Policy
    An evolving EU engaging a changing Mediterranean region Jean Monnet Occasional Paper 01/2013 Iceland’s contested European Policy: The Footprint of the Past - A Small and Insular Society by Baldur Thorhallsson Copyright © 2013, Baldur Thorhallsson, University of Malta ISSN 2307-3950 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without any prior written permission from the Institute for European Studies, University of Malta. Publisher: Institute for European Studies, Msida, Malta. The Institute for European Studies The Institute for European Studies is a multi-disciplinary teaching and research Institute at the University of Malta, offering courses in European Studies which fully conform to the Bologna guidelines, including an evening diploma, a bachelor’s degree, a masters and a Ph.D. The Institute also operates a number of Erasmus agreements for staff and student exchanges. Founded in 1992 as the European Documentation and Research Centre (EDRC), the Institute was granted the status of a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence in 2004. The Institute is engaged in various research and publication activities in European Integration Studies and is a member of the Trans-European Policy Studies Association (TEPSA), the LISBOAN network, EPERN, EADI, and the two Euro-Mediterranean networks, EuroMeSCo and FEMISE. The Institute is also a member of the Council for European Studies (hosted at Columbia University). The research interests of its staff include comparative politics and history of the European Union (EU); EU institutions; EU external relations and enlargement; small states in the EU; Malta in the EU; Euro-Mediterranean relations; Stability and Growth Pact; economic governance of the euro area; Europe 2020; EU development policies, climate change, international economics, economic causes and consequences of globalisation and EU trade and cohesion policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Anti-Corruption Insights Update on Recent Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Developments
    Global Anti-Corruption Insights Update on Recent Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Developments Winter 2015 arnoldporter.com Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 2014 YEAR IN REVIEW _______ 3 KEY ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATIVE DEVELOPMENTS _____________________________________ 6 Notable Corporate FCPA Enforcement Actions Resolved by the Justice Department and/or SEC __________________ 6 Justice Department and SEC Enforcement Actions against Individuals for Violations of the FCPA __________________ 11 Top U.S. Enforcement Officials Comment on FCPA ________ 13 FBI Reportedly Tripling Number of Agents Focused on Foreign Bribery __________________________________ 14 DOJ Releases Opinion Regarding Corporate Acquisitions ___ 14 Rounding Out the Enforcement Docket __________________ 15 SEC Whistleblower Program Update____________________ 18 DOJ Recovers Proceeds of Corruption under Its Kleptocracy Initiative _____________________________ 19 FCPA-Related Civil Litigation _________________________ 20 GLOBAL ANTI-CORRUPTION UPDATE ________________ 24 Developments in the United Kingdom ___________________ 24 Former SNC Lavalin Executive Pleads Guilty To Swiss Charges, Is Extradited To Canada To Face Additional Charges _ 27 Brazilian Authorities File Bribery Charges _______________ 28 Former Deutsche Securities Inc. Salesman Receives Suspended Sentence in Japanese Bribe Case ______________ 29 Italy Investigates Oil Company Eni SpA _________________ 29 OECD Releases Foreign Bribery Report _________________ 30 Transparency International Releases
    [Show full text]