DOCSLIB.ORG

Delivering Sustainable Buildings: Savings and Payback – Breakfast Briefing Yetunde Abdul, Principal Consultant, BRE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delivering Sustainable Buildings: Savings and Payback – Breakfast Briefing Yetunde Abdul, Principal Consultant, BRE Protecting People, Property and the Planet Delivering Sustainable Buildings: Savings and Payback – Breakfast Briefing Yetunde Abdul, Principal Consultant, BRE Part of the BRE Trust BREEAM UK New Construction scheme – New BRE Trust capital and life cycle cost study – BREEAM UK New Construction 2011 scheme – Covers costs associated with: § ‘Pass’ to ‘Excellent’ ratings § Energy and water capital and life cycle costs, payback and utility savings – Key contributors § BRE Global – project managers and authors § BRE Trust and Cabinet Office – funding bodies § Sweett Group – provided costing information, conducted cost studies and produced cost results Why conduct this research? – Lack of cost data relating to post 2008 UK BREEAM schemes – Builds on previously BRE Trust research e.g. Putting a Price on Sustainability – Key BREEAM stakeholders requesting more recent evidence of costs associated with sustainable buildings – Inform BREEAM scheme development - BREEAM UK New Construction 2011 to the 2014 version Methodology: an overview – Three case study buildings: § an air-conditioned office § a secondary school § a community healthcare centre – Base case building established (meets statutory requirements) – Range of sustainability measures identified and applied – Represented progressively higher levels of BREEAM ratings – Factors taken into consideration in determining costs include: § Location (poor, typical, good) § Range of specification choices/design decisions Key results Capital costs – Achieving lower BREEAM ratings incurs little or no additional cost – Targeting higher BREEAM ratings incurs some additional cost but this is typical less than 2 % Lifecycle costs – The study of operational costs shows that this can be paid back within 2 - 5 years through utility cost savings Office case study Office case study building General project information – Speculative building, consisting of five storeys – Gross floor area = 13,800 m2 – Net office space area = 11,150m2 – Base build capital cost = £27.6m (£2000/m2) Features – Steel-frame construction, concrete ground-floor slab and upper floors, glazed curtain walling, double-glazed windows – Four-pipe fan-coil air conditioning served by gas boilers and water cooled chillers, efficient lighting system, electric instantaneous hot water to all toilet and kitchen areas – High quality space expected to attract tenants with an interest in the green agenda Increase in capital costs for each BREEAM rating Location BREEAM score % Increase in capital cost relative to BREEAM and rating for rating of Pass, Good / Very Good / Excellent the case study building Pass Good Very Good Excellent Good 46.7 (Good) 0 0 0.13 0.87 Typical Further information available in the report for these location types Poor Energy consumption life cycle costs and savings: Contribution to BREEAM Excellent rating – Option 2 Energy Energy Capital Lifecycle Payback Annual Annual Annual Solution price Costs savings period Gas electricity CO2 scenario (£) (£) (years) Savings Savings – savings – (kWh) (kWh) (kgCO2) Central Option 1 - DECC 8 479,352 Passive chilled energy beams prices 167,250 High -1450 153,870 79,264 DECC Option 2 - energy Active chilled 503,313 8 prices beams Lifecycle savings equate to the net electricity and gas bill savings less any additional maintenance or replacement costs over 25 years. Water consumption life cycle costs and savings BREEAM Capital Payback Payback Water saving credits Cost (over period period per annum baseline) (m3/years) (£) (Higher (Lower tariff) tariff) 1st 0 0 0 2847 2nd 1220 1 1 3566 3rd 8570 1 1 5014 4th 14,150 1 2 6017 5th 74,150 3 9 6425 Lower tariff (Ofwat figures) assumes a tariff of £1.692/m3 (Thames Water) plus a 0.5% tariff increase per annum. Higher tariff (Ofwat figures) assumes a tariff of £4.351/m3 (South West Water) plus a 0.5% tariff increase per annum. Growing evidence of sustainability benefits 2013 World Green Building Council Investment costs not (WorldGBC) report as high as perceived Potentially significant 2012 BSRIA Report: The Value of BREEAM life cycle cost savings report Increased value, 2012 RICS report :Supply, Demand and the suggested higher staff Value of Green productivity levels 2012 Town & Country Planning Association’s Decreasing costs publication ‘Good Practice Guide – Sustainable Design & Construction Trend towards a reduction in the increased capital costs associated with BREEAM ratings: Offices BREEAM BREEAM version used in capital cost studies rating 2004* 2008† 2011‡ Pass 0.0 – 0.0 Good 0.0 – 0.05 – 0.15 Very good 0.2 0.17 0.13 – 0.34 Excellent 0.1 – 5.7 0.77 0.87 – 1.71 * Putting a Price on Sustainability (2004) † Steel Construction info, Target Zero (2008) ‡ Delivering Savings and Payback (2014) This version of BREEAM does not necessarily denote the year of building construction or year of BREEAM assessment Protecting People, Property and the Planet Thank you www.breeam.com/value [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROUND the BEND TEAM Being Through Our Efforts
    Round the bend Farm A CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE COMMUNITY 1 LETTER FROM THE It’s been an AMAZING monarch year for us here at RTB. We even offered CO-VISIONARIES a monarch class in July Desa & Nia Van Laarhoven and we’ve been hatching & Geoff Kinder some at RTB to increase s fall descends on Round the Bend Farm their odds. (RTB), vivid colors mark the passage of time. Autumn’s return grounds us amid Aeach day’s frenetic news cycles. It reminds us of the deeper cycle that connects us all to the earth and to each other. And yet one news story, from late September, has done the same. More than 7.5 million people came together in cities and villages across the planet to call in unison for an environmentally just and sustainable world. This is a story that speaks to RTB’s mission and purpose and demonstrates the concept of Restorative Community that’s so central to our existence. You can see it in the image that juxtaposed September’s global crowds with the prior year’s solitary Swedish protester. You can hear it in the words spoken by an Indigenous Brazilian teen to 250,000 people lining the streets of New York City. Restorative Community is a force multiplier for our own personal commitments to justice, health and peace. It nurtures and supports us as individuals, unites and strengthens us as a movement and harnesses our differences in service of our common goals. In community, we respect, enjoy and learn from each other. As you page through this year’s annual report, we hope you experience the same! We’re This past year, we continued to expand our inspired and encouraged by what we’ve Restorative Community at RTB, more than accomplished this year and we’re honored to doubling the number of people who visited serve our community in ever new ways.
    [Show full text]
  • 87198 Construction 2025 V2.Indd
    www.bre.co.uk Meeting Construction 2025 Targets The positive impact of BRE Group products and services Construction 2025 is the joint strategy from government and industry for the future of the UK construction industry This document summarises the positive impacts in respect of these targets, Lower costs of a selection of products Industrial Strategy: government and industry in partnership BREEAM CLIP and services developed by the BRE Group. Brief average saved 150 descriptions of the projected companies a total products – BREEAM, savings of of £56 million Construction 2025 CALIBRE, CLIP and 22.56% SMARTWaste – and of BRE are also included. July 2013 Buildings assessed under Since 2003 BRE’s Construction BREEAM 2011 New Lean Improvement Construction enjoy average Programme (CLIP) has projected savings of 22.56% saved 150 companies a on their energy bills.1 total of £56 million. Construction 2025 sets out challenging construction targets for 2025 that include: CALIBRE SMARTWaste improvement in 50% exports 10% cost saving savings could equates to be £1.4 million 33% lower costs £1,144 2 per in 2015 and £1.7 house million in 20166 50% lower emissions A 10% cost saving can be Companies have saved around achieved by using CALIBRE 20% of waste going to landfill to identify non-value added by using SMARTWaste. This faster delivery activities on housing projects. is the equivalent to £1.2 50% 7 This equates to savings million a year. If this level of of around £1,1442 per waste diversion continued, house. Savings for housing then future cost savings projects using CALIBRE in could be £1.4 million in 2015 Improvement in 2013 are estimated to be and £1.7 million in 20166.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding On-Farm Anaerobic Digestion September 2012
    Funding On-Farm Anaerobic Digestion September 2012 naerobic digestion of on-farm manure resources offers Some examples of programs where federal and state agencies livestock and poultry producers (farm operators) a unique provide grant funding for the construction and operation of Aopportunity to increase on-farm revenue. As energy costs anaerobic digesters include the U.S. Department of Agriculture become a larger part of the farm operation budget, farm operators (USDA) Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) and Ohio’s are increasingly looking to energy efficiency and renewable energy State Energy Program. In some cases, federal-level funding projects as a viable option for increasing farm revenues. One such sources (i.e., American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, option is anaerobic digestion of animal manure, a waste resource or ARRA) provide states with grant money that is administered at that has considerable potential for generating clean, renewable, the state level. For additional information on funding programs domestic energy. available for anaerobic digesters, see the fact sheet Funding Programs for Developing Anaerobic Digestion Systems (http:// One of the biggest obstacles to widespread adoption of on-farm www.epa.gov/agstar/documents/agstar_federal_incentives.pdf), anaerobic digestion has been its cost. Anaerobic digesters require and also the AgSTAR Funding database, Funding On-Farm Biogas significant amounts of up-front capital costs (expenditures), in Recovery Systems: A Guide to Federal and State Resources (http://
    [Show full text]
  • Business/NGO Partnerships -- What's the Payback?
    Business/NGO Partnerships -- What’s the Payback? By Roger Cowe Ethical Corporation April 2004 Here’s a look at some high profile cases of business/NGO partnerships and the strategic benefits and challenges for both sides. When Greenpeace shared a platform with Shell at the Johannesburg Summit, the contrast with the classic notion of business/NGO confrontation could not have been starker. A decade earlier, one of the oil giant’s redundant platforms (such as Brent Spar) would have been the only kind to have interested the campaign group. Johannesburg was the Partnership summit. It was built on the premise that governments cannot achieve sustainability on their own, that businesses can be part of the solution, and that NGOs have at least as good an idea what the solution is as anybody else. The business world is also formally engaged in pursuing the UN’s Millennium Development Goals. The joint call by Greenpeace and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development for action on climate change symbolized the growing feeling on both sides that NGOs working with businesses can often achieve more than by attacking from the outside. Many campaigners are still suspicious, and even those working with business reserve the right to criticize. But many partnerships were launched in Johannesburg; many more have flowered since -- from BAT on biodiversity to Coca- Cola on HIV/Aids. The attractions are obvious, but so are the dangers. Most significant, perhaps, is the danger that the concept is used simply to get businesses to stump up money, which is more like taxation than partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Bribery Digest
    UK Bribery Digest Edition 14 September 2020 UK BRIBERY DIGEST | EDITION 14 CONTENTS WELCOME Click to continue 1 | UK Bribery Digest Edition 14 | September 2020 Regulatory and enforcement landscape: Guidance released for an effective compliance programme Over the last 18 months we have seen a significant encourage more effective collaboration between key volume of updated compliance guidance being issued players within an organisation. by regulators and enforcement agencies. Whilst these releases are from regulators and As part of their Operational Handbook, the Serious enforcement agencies in different jurisdictions, Fraud Office (SFO) released the ‘Corporate Co- due to the increasingly global reach of white-collar operation Guidance’ in August 2019, and in crime legislation and the increased cross border January 2020, released an updated chapter on the cooperation between enforcement agencies, ‘Evaluating a Compliance Programme’. a multinational corporation would be naïve to focus on a single framework. Instead, most global With little to no warning, in June 2020 the United businesses set a standard which at least meets States Department of Justice (DoJ) also released • Transparency International — Business principles the requirements of all the leading legislation and updated guidance on the ‘Evaluation of Corporate for countering bribery guidance. By way of example of the increasingly Compliance Programs’. This was followed with an global nature of guidance, the latest FCPA Resource • United Nations Global Compact — The ten updated
    [Show full text]
  • 2KSWIN WWE2K19 PC Online
    IMPORTANT HEALTH WARNING: PHOTOSENSITIVE SEIZURES A very small percentage of people may experience a seizure when exposed to certain visual images, including flashing lights or patterns that may appear in video games. Even people with no history of seizures or epilepsy may have an undiagnosed condition that can cause “photosensitive epileptic seizures” while watching video games. Symptoms can include light-headedness, altered vision, eye or face twitching, jerking or shaking of arms or legs, disorientation, confusion, momentary loss of awareness, and loss of consciousness or convulsions that can lead to injury from falling down or striking nearby objects. Immediately stop playing and consult a doctor if you experience any of these symptoms. Parents, watch for or ask children about these symptoms—children and teenagers are more likely to experience these seizures. The risk may be reduced by being farther from the screen; using a smaller screen; playing in a well-lit room, and not playing when drowsy or fatigued. If you or any relatives have a history of seizures or epilepsy, consult a doctor before playing. Product Support: http://support.2k.com Please note that WWE 2K19 online features are scheduled to be available until May 31, 2020 though we reserve the right to modify or discontinue online features without notice. 2 KEYBOARD CONTROLS ACTION KEY WAKE UP TAUNT 1 TOGGLE SIGNATURE / FINISHER 2 TAUNT OPPONENT 3 TAUNT CROWD 4 PAUSE ESC DISPLAY CURRENT TARGET C FRONT FACELOCK / GRAPPLE DOWN ARROW IRISH WHIP / PIN RIGHT ARROW SIGNATURE / FINISHER
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Education
    Vol. 81 Friday, No. 161 August 19, 2016 Part III Department of Education 34 CFR Parts 367, 369, 370, et al. Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, Miscellaneous Program Changes; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:03 Aug 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\19AUR3.SGM 19AUR3 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES3 55562 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION program, 34 CFR part 371 (formerly Finally, as part of this update, the known as ‘‘Vocational Rehabilitation Secretary removes regulations that are 34 CFR Parts 367, 369, 370, 371, 373, Service Projects for American Indians superseded or obsolete and consolidates 376, 377, 379, 381, 385, 386, 387, 388, with Disabilities’’); regulations, where appropriate. In 389, 390, and 396 • The Rehabilitation National addition to removing portions of 34 CFR [Docket No. 2015–ED–OSERS–0002] Activities program, 34 CFR part 373 part 369 pertaining to specific programs (formerly known as ‘‘Special whose statutory authority was repealed RIN 1820–AB71 Demonstration Projects’’); under WIOA (i.e., Migrant Workers • The Protection and Advocacy of program, the Recreational Programs, and Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Individual Rights (PAIR) program, 34 the Projects With Industry program), the Act, Miscellaneous Program Changes CFR part 381; Secretary is removing the remaining AGENCY: Office of Special Education and • The Rehabilitation Training portions of the Part 369 regulations. The Rehabilitative Services, Department of program, 34 CFR part 385; Secretary is also removing parts 376, Education. • The Rehabilitation Long-Term 377, and 389.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Sustainable Buildings Savings and Payback
    Delivering sustainable buildings Savings and payback Yetunde Abdul and Richard Quartermaine Delivering sustainable buildings Savings and payback Yetunde Abdul (BRE) Richard Quartermaine (Sweett Group) ii BRE Trust is the largest UK charity dedicated specifically to All URLs accessed July 2014. Any third-party URLs are given research and education in the built environment. BRE Trust for information and reference purposes only and BRE and IHS uses the profits made by its trading companies to fund new do not control or warrant the accuracy, relevance, availability, research and education programmes that advance knowledge, timeliness or completeness of the information contained on innovation and communication for public benefit. any third-party website. Inclusion of any third-party details or website is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it BRE Trust is a company limited by guarantee, registered in intended to endorse any views expressed, products or services England and Wales (no. 3282856) and registered as a charity in offered, nor the companies or organisations in question. England (no. 1092193) and in Scotland (no. SC039320). Registered office: Bucknalls Lane, Garston, Watford, Herts Any views expressed in this publication are not necessarily WD25 9XX those of BRE or IHS. BRE and IHS have made every effort to Tel: +44 (0) 333 321 8811 ensure that the information and guidance in this publication Email: [email protected] were accurate when published, but can take no responsibility www.bretrust.org.uk for the subsequent use of this information, nor for any errors or omissions it may contain. To the extent permitted by law, IHS (NYSE: IHS) is the leading source of information, insight BRE and IHS shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense and analytics in critical areas that shape today’s business incurred by reliance on the information or any statement landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Report
    PROGRAMS I STATE CASH FLOW * R FED CASH FLOW * COMPARE REPORT U INTRASTATE * LOOPS * UNFUNDED * FEASIBILITY * DIVISION 7 TYPE OF WORK / ESTIMATED COST IN THOUSANDS / PROJECT BREAK TOTAL PRIOR STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJ YEARS 5 YEAR WORK PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM "UNFUNDED" LOCATION / DESCRIPTION COST COST FUNDING ID (LENGTH) ROUTE/CITY COUNTY NUMBER (THOU) (THOU) SOURCE FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FUTURE YEARS 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) I-40/85 ALAMANCE I-4714 NC 49 (MILE POST 145) TO NC 54 (MILE 7551 7551 IMPM CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 POST 148). MILL AND RESURFACE. (2.8 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) PROJECT COMPLETE - GARVEE BOND FUNDING $4.4 MILLION; PAYBACK FY 2007 - FY 2018 I-40/85 ALAMANCE I-4714 NC 49 (MILEPOST 145) TO NC 54 (MILEPOST 5898 869 IMPM CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 1676 148). MILL AND RESURFACE. (2.8 MILES) PROJECT COMPLETE - GARVEE BOND FUNDING $4.4 MILLION; PAYBACK FY 2007 - FY 2018 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) I-40/I-85 ALAMANCE I-4918 NC 54 (MILE POST 148) IN ALAMANCE COUNTY 9361 9361 IMPM CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 TO WEST OF SR 1114 (BUCKHORN ROAD) IN ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY. MILL AND RESURFACE. (8.3 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) PROJECT COMPLETE - GARVEE BOND FUNDING $12.0 MILLION; PAYBACK FY 2007 - FY 2018 I-40/I-85 ALAMANCE I-4918 NC 54 (MILEPOST 148) IN ALAMANCE COUNTY 15906 2120 IMPM CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 4595 TO WEST OF SR 1114 (BUCKHORN ROAD) IN ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY.
    [Show full text]
  • Premium Efficiency Motor Selection and Application Guide
    ADVANCED MANUFACTURING OFFICE PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR SELECTION AND APPLICATION GUIDE A HANDBOOK FOR INDUSTRY DISCLAIMER This publication was prepared by the Washington State University Energy Program for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Neither the United States, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Copper Development Association, the Washington State University Energy Program, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process described in this guidebook. In addition, no endorsement is implied by the use of examples, figures, or courtesy photos. PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR SELECTION AND APPLICATION GUIDE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Premium Efficiency Motor Selection and Application Guide and its companion publication, Continuous Energy Improvement in Motor-Driven Systems, have been developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) with support from the Copper Development Association (CDA). The authors extend thanks to the EERE Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) and to Rolf Butters, Scott Hutchins, and Paul Scheihing for their support and guidance. Thanks are also due to Prakash Rao of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Rolf Butters (AMO and Vestal Tutterow of PPC for reviewing and providing publication comments. The primary authors of this publication are Gilbert A. McCoy and John G. Douglass of the Washington State University (WSU) Energy Program. Helpful reviews and comments were provided by Rob Penney of WSU; Vestal Tutterow of Project Performance Corporation, and Richard deFay, Project Manager, Sustainable Energy with CDA.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing Viability - Brief Review
    D I S I P Housing & Development Consultants Working for you Harrogate Borough Council -Affordable Housing Viability - Brief Review Ref: DSP 14249 April 2014 Dixon Searle LLP The Old Hayloft 28C Headley Road Grayshott Hindhead GU26 6LD Contents Introduction 2 Property Market Overview 4 Development Costs 18 Sample Appraisals – Results 23 Conclusions 26 i Harrogate BC D|S|P Housing & Development Consultants 1. Introduction 1.1.1 In 2009/2010 Harrogate Borough Council had an Affordable Housing Economic Viability Assessment (AHEVA) carried out to provide part of the evidence base to the Council in developing affordable housing policies for its Sites and Policies Development Plan Document (SAPDPD) – part of the Harrogate District Local Plan. This study used a number of assumptions to test the potential impact of planning policies on development viability at a strategic level including the level of affordable housing (proportion of homes that should be affordable on residential market developments), the point at which it is requested (threshold level) and the tenure. These were correct and reflected practice at the time of undertaking and publishing the study but of course could not have foreseen future changes to a combination of market conditions (values), costs and Government policy. 1.1.2 The research informing the AHEVA (including seeking of soundings from development industry stakeholders) was carried out in the main during September to December 2009, though kept open through to the September 2010 study completion date. 1.1.3 The AHEVA assumptions need to be fixed at a point in time, to allow the appraisal stage to go-ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • 201 ,QWHUQDWLRQDO 9Aluation Handbook ,QGXVWU\ Cost of Capital
    201,QWHUQDWLRQDO9aluation Handbook ,QGXVWU\ Cost of Capital Market Results Through0DUFK 2015 Duff & Phelps &RPSDQ\/LVW 1RWH 7KLV GRFXPHQW SURYLGHV D OLVW RI WKH FRPSDQLHV XVHG WR SHUIRUP WKH DQDO\VHV SXEOLVKHG LQ WKH ,QWHUQDWLRQDO 9DOXDWLRQ +DQGERRN ̰ ,QGXVWU\ &RVW RI &DSLWDO GDWD WKURXJK 0DUFK 7KHLQIRUPDWLRQ KHUHLQ LV VSHFLILF WR WKH KDUGFRYHU ,QWHUQDWLRQDO 9DOXDWLRQ +DQGERRN ̰,QGXVWU\ &RVW RI &DSLWDO GDWD WKURXJK 0DUFK DQG LV QRW DSSOLFDEOH WR DQ\ RWKHU ERRN XSGDWH RU GRFXPHQW Cover image: Duff & Phelps Cover design: Tim Harms Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. The foregoing does not preclude End-users from using the 2015 International Valuation Handbook ࣓ Industry Cost of Capital and data published therein in connection with their internal business operations.
    [Show full text]