Glenigan Breakfast Briefing: 20 November 2014 Delegate List
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Contractors with Total Contract Value of Over £100,000 Chart Based on Contracts with a Value of Over 5000 GBP
Contractors with total contract value of over £100,000 chart Based on Contracts with a value of over 5000 GBP Contract Value Supplier Name 116325.00 Affinity Workforce Ltd 796000.00 Solace Women's Aid 323557.00 BARTS HEALTH NHS TRUST 210147.00 Boxmoor Construction Ltd 107420.30 EUROPEAN ELECTRONIQUE LTD 415448.22 HAYHURST AND CO 198221000.00 United Living (South) Ltd 894000.00 Working Men's College 450000.00 Capita Travel and Events 4405561.66 CATERLINK LTD 135545.21 CHURCHES FIRE SECURITY LTD 400000.00 Artelia UK 105036.66 Vinci Construction Uk Ltd 500000.00 CAMPBELL REITH HILL LLP 17000000.00 Re-Gen UK 408098.00 IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 4707213.00 ST MUNGO COMMUNITY HOUSING (GRIFFIN HSE) 131176.21 Softcat Ltd 147371.31 DAVID PHILLIPS 250971.43 Marcus & Marcus Ltd Page 1 of 22 10/02/2021 Contractors with total contract value of over £100,000 chart Based on Contracts with a value of over 5000 GBP 136044.00 CENTRAL & CECIL 198667.55 GODWIN & CROWNDALE TMC LTD 288142.90 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS 494918.96 APEX HOUSING SOLUTIONS 425000.00 Rick Mather Architects LLP 148855.40 Alderwood LLA Ltd - Irchester 2 821312.26 Falcon Structural Repairs 1169203.00 Ark Build PLC 103675.37 MANOR HOSTELS (LONDON) LTD 319608347.72 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (UK) PLC 299532.76 CASTLEHAVEN COMMUNITY ASSOC. 207757.50 PERSONALISATION SUPPORT IN CAMDEN 12000000.00 AD Construction Group 678874.77 St Johns Wood - Lifestyle Care (2011) PLC 424893.63 INSIGHT DIRECT (UK) LTD 150366.19 HOLLY LODGE ESTATE COMMITTEE 114136.63 SPECIALIST COMPUTER CENTRES 943735.13 Mihomecare 4800000.00 Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd 140000000.00 Volkerhighways 233048.00 KPMG 1150000.00 LONDON DIOCESAN BOARD FOR SCHOOLS Page 2 of 22 10/02/2021 Contractors with total contract value of over £100,000 chart Based on Contracts with a value of over 5000 GBP 302480.00 DAISY DATA CENTRE SOLUTIONS LTD 30000000.00 Eurovia Infrastructure 140126.15 DAWSONRENTALS BUS & COACH LTD 261847.08 ST MARTIN OF TOURS HOUSING ASSOC. -
South East Maidstone Urban Extension Review of Cashflow Model and Viability
South East Maidstone Urban Extension Review of cashflow model and viability Prepared on behalf of Golding Homes 20 April 2012 Final DTZ 125 Old Broad Street London EC2N 2BQ PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL www.dtz.com Review of cashflow model and viability | Golding Homes Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Basis of Instruction 4 2 Golding Homes Financial Model Structure 5 2.1 Key Scheme Details 5 2.2 The Financial Model 6 3 Review of Revenue Assumptions 8 3.1 Revenue 8 3.1.1 Market Sale Housing 8 3.1.2 Affordable Housing 9 3.2 Future House Prices, Absorption and Sales Rates 10 3.2.1 Assumptions about Sales/ Build Out Rates 11 3.3 New Homes Bonus 12 3.4 Current Housing Land Supply 12 4 Review of Cost Assumptions 14 4.1 Cost 14 4.1.1 Unit Sizes 14 4.1.2 Build Costs 14 4.1.3 Code for Sustainable Homes 15 4.1.4 Cost Inflation 15 4.2 On Costs 16 4.3 Planning Contributions (CIL & s106) 17 4.4 Finance Rate 18 4.5 Infrastructure Costs 19 4.6 Land Value 20 4.7 Profit 20 5 Scenario Analysis 22 6 Summary 24 6.1 Delivery Structure 24 6.2 Financial Returns 24 Final 2 Review of cashflow model and viability | Golding Homes Status of Report and Limitations This report contains information which may be commercially sensitive if released. Circulation should be limited to appropriate individuals within Golding Homes. The contents of this report are confidential to Golding Homes in the context in which the report is supplied and DTZ expressly disclaims any responsibility towards third parties in respect of the whole or any part of its contents. -
87198 Construction 2025 V2.Indd
www.bre.co.uk Meeting Construction 2025 Targets The positive impact of BRE Group products and services Construction 2025 is the joint strategy from government and industry for the future of the UK construction industry This document summarises the positive impacts in respect of these targets, Lower costs of a selection of products Industrial Strategy: government and industry in partnership BREEAM CLIP and services developed by the BRE Group. Brief average saved 150 descriptions of the projected companies a total products – BREEAM, savings of of £56 million Construction 2025 CALIBRE, CLIP and 22.56% SMARTWaste – and of BRE are also included. July 2013 Buildings assessed under Since 2003 BRE’s Construction BREEAM 2011 New Lean Improvement Construction enjoy average Programme (CLIP) has projected savings of 22.56% saved 150 companies a on their energy bills.1 total of £56 million. Construction 2025 sets out challenging construction targets for 2025 that include: CALIBRE SMARTWaste improvement in 50% exports 10% cost saving savings could equates to be £1.4 million 33% lower costs £1,144 2 per in 2015 and £1.7 house million in 20166 50% lower emissions A 10% cost saving can be Companies have saved around achieved by using CALIBRE 20% of waste going to landfill to identify non-value added by using SMARTWaste. This faster delivery activities on housing projects. is the equivalent to £1.2 50% 7 This equates to savings million a year. If this level of of around £1,1442 per waste diversion continued, house. Savings for housing then future cost savings projects using CALIBRE in could be £1.4 million in 2015 Improvement in 2013 are estimated to be and £1.7 million in 20166. -
EMPIRIC STUDENT PROPERTY PLC September 2016 AGENDA and PRESENTATION TEAM
EMPIRIC STUDENT PROPERTY PLC September 2016 AGENDA AND PRESENTATION TEAM Section Page Tim Attlee, MRICS – Founder and CIO Focus on student residential sector since 2009 The UK Student Jointly responsible for the acquisition, development 3 and investment management activities Accommodation Market Held senior roles at Knight Frank Qualified chartered surveyor Company Overview and 6 Highlights THE UK STUDENT ACCOMMODATION MARKET THE UK STUDENT ACCOMMODATION MARKET There are four key trends driving the growth in the purpose built student accommodation (“PBSA”) market The UK population is increasing, putting pressure on housing UK Population Projections (m) 75 70 65 60 55 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 Source: ONS Local authorities are cutting back on HMOs Given the pressure on housing throughout the UK, local authorities have been attempting to move students out of the traditional “House in multiple occupation” (“HMO”) into PBSAs to provide more housing space for families and workers Source: Arcadis/EC Harris THE UK STUDENT ACCOMMODATION MARKET (CONT’D) Student numbers in the UK are growing at a strong rates Growth in student acceptances for Sept 2015 over Sept 2014 11.0% 3.9% 3.6% 1.9% All Students UK Students EU Students International Students Source: ONS (Non-EU) University owned housing stock is of poor quality "As New" Refurbishment Current university owned PBSA stock is of poor 57,122 quality. Of the 324,532 student beds owned by needed 267,410 universities, only 57,122 are “as new” with the remainder in need of refurbishment or replacement THE UK STUDENT ACCOMMODATION MARKET Demand for UK Higher Education to UK Higher Education keep rising Applicants vs. -
UK Bribery Digest
UK Bribery Digest Edition 14 September 2020 UK BRIBERY DIGEST | EDITION 14 CONTENTS WELCOME Click to continue 1 | UK Bribery Digest Edition 14 | September 2020 Regulatory and enforcement landscape: Guidance released for an effective compliance programme Over the last 18 months we have seen a significant encourage more effective collaboration between key volume of updated compliance guidance being issued players within an organisation. by regulators and enforcement agencies. Whilst these releases are from regulators and As part of their Operational Handbook, the Serious enforcement agencies in different jurisdictions, Fraud Office (SFO) released the ‘Corporate Co- due to the increasingly global reach of white-collar operation Guidance’ in August 2019, and in crime legislation and the increased cross border January 2020, released an updated chapter on the cooperation between enforcement agencies, ‘Evaluating a Compliance Programme’. a multinational corporation would be naïve to focus on a single framework. Instead, most global With little to no warning, in June 2020 the United businesses set a standard which at least meets States Department of Justice (DoJ) also released • Transparency International — Business principles the requirements of all the leading legislation and updated guidance on the ‘Evaluation of Corporate for countering bribery guidance. By way of example of the increasingly Compliance Programs’. This was followed with an global nature of guidance, the latest FCPA Resource • United Nations Global Compact — The ten updated -
Marketplace Sponsorship Opportunities Information Pack 2017
MarketPlace Sponsorship Opportunities Information Pack 2017 www.airmic.com/marketplace £ Sponsorship 950 plus VAT Annual Conference Website * 1 complimentary delegate pass for Monday www.airmic.com/marketplace only (worth £695)* A designated web page on the MarketPlace Advanced notification of the exhibition floor plan section of the website which will include your logo, contact details and opportunity to upload 20% discount off delegate places any PDF service information documents Advanced notification to book on-site meeting rooms Airmic Dinner Logo on conference banner Advanced notification to buy tickets for the Annual Dinner, 12th December 2017 Logo in conference brochure Access to pre-dinner hospitality tables Opportunity to receive venue branding opportunities Additional Opportunities * This discount is only valid for someone who have never attended an Airmic Conference Airmic can post updates/events for you on before Linked in/Twitter ERM Forum Opportunity to submit articles on technical subjects in Airmic News (subject to editor’s discretion) Opportunity to purchase a table stand at the ERM Forum Opportunity to promote MP content online via @ Airmic Twitter or the Airmic Linked In Group About Airmic Membership Airmic has a membership of about 1200 from about 480 companies. It represents the Insurance buyers for about 70% of the FTSE 100, as well as a very substantial representation in the mid-250 and other smaller companies. Membership continues to grow, and retention remains at 90%. Airmic members’ controls about £5 billion of annual insurance premium spend. A further £2 billion of premium spend is allocated to captive insurance companies within member organisations. Additionally, members are responsible for the payment of insurance claims from their business finances to the value of at least £2 billion per year. -
Delivering Sustainable Buildings Savings and Payback
Delivering sustainable buildings Savings and payback Yetunde Abdul and Richard Quartermaine Delivering sustainable buildings Savings and payback Yetunde Abdul (BRE) Richard Quartermaine (Sweett Group) ii BRE Trust is the largest UK charity dedicated specifically to All URLs accessed July 2014. Any third-party URLs are given research and education in the built environment. BRE Trust for information and reference purposes only and BRE and IHS uses the profits made by its trading companies to fund new do not control or warrant the accuracy, relevance, availability, research and education programmes that advance knowledge, timeliness or completeness of the information contained on innovation and communication for public benefit. any third-party website. Inclusion of any third-party details or website is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it BRE Trust is a company limited by guarantee, registered in intended to endorse any views expressed, products or services England and Wales (no. 3282856) and registered as a charity in offered, nor the companies or organisations in question. England (no. 1092193) and in Scotland (no. SC039320). Registered office: Bucknalls Lane, Garston, Watford, Herts Any views expressed in this publication are not necessarily WD25 9XX those of BRE or IHS. BRE and IHS have made every effort to Tel: +44 (0) 333 321 8811 ensure that the information and guidance in this publication Email: [email protected] were accurate when published, but can take no responsibility www.bretrust.org.uk for the subsequent use of this information, nor for any errors or omissions it may contain. To the extent permitted by law, IHS (NYSE: IHS) is the leading source of information, insight BRE and IHS shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense and analytics in critical areas that shape today’s business incurred by reliance on the information or any statement landscape. -
A Comparative Study of Construction Cost and Commercial Management Services in the UK and China
PERERA, S., ZHOU, L., UDEAJA, C., VICTORIA, M. and CHEN, Q. 2016. A comparative study of construction cost and commercial management services in the UK and China. London: RICS. A comparative study of construction cost and commercial management services in the UK and China. PERERA, S., ZHOU, L., UDEAJA, C., VICTORIA, M. and CHEN, Q. 2016 © 2016 Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. This document was downloaded from https://openair.rgu.ac.uk Research May 2016 A Comparative Study of Construction Cost and Commercial Management Services in the UK and China 中英工程造价管理产业比较研究 GLOBAL/APRIL 2016/DML/20603/RESEARCH GLOBAL/APRIL rics.org/research A Comparative Study of Construction Cost and Commercial Management Services in the UK and China 中英工程造价管理产业比较研究 rics.org/research Report for Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Report written by: Prof. Srinath Perera PhD MSc IT BSc (Hons) QS MRICS AAIQS Chair in Construction Economics [email protected] kimtag.com/srinath Dr. Lei Zhou Senior Lecturer Dr. Chika Udeaja Senior Lecturer Michele Victoria Researcher Northumbria University northumbria-qs.org Prof. Qijun Chen Director of Human Resource Department, Shandong Jianzhu University RICS Research team Dr. Clare Eriksson FRICS Director of Global Research & Policy [email protected] Amanprit Johal Funded by: Global Research and Policy Manager [email protected] Published by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) RICS, Parliament Square, London SW1P 3AD www.rics.org The views expressed by the authors are not necessarily those of RICS nor any body connected with RICS. Neither the authors, nor RICS accept any liability arising from the use of this publication. -
Global Construction Disputes: a Longer Resolution
Global Construction Disputes Report 2013 Global Construction Disputes: A Longer Resolution echarris.com/contractsolutions Introduction Executive summary This is our third annual report into the construction The key finding of this year’s report into global disputes market. I hope that you will find it to be a construction disputes is that disputes are taking helpful commentary into the regional trends and longer to resolve. insights into a global industry that is often difficult to quantify. Overall, they are now taking over a year to resolve, with the average length of time for a dispute to last in 2012 Overall, this year’s report finds that disputes are taking being 12.8 months, compared to 10.6 months in 2011. longer to resolve and the causes are linked to many different This continues the trends for longer disputes - in 2010 factors, including: disputes were taking 9.1 months to resolve. ■ Disputes that are not settled through negotiation tend Whilst dispute durations are getting longer, the value of to indicate a polarisation of interests, and are likely to disputes was broadly stable in 2012. The average value only contain the most complex of issues; of global construction disputes in 2012 was US$31.7 million, down slightly from US$32.2 million in 2011. ■ Multi-geography, mixed cultures and the need to consult and engage with head offices can prolong the time it takes Longer disputes times – a global trend for a dispute to be concluded; The average length of disputes rose across Asia, the ■ Projects are increasing in complexity and so the issues Middle East and the UK. -
Geographical Distribution and Selection of European Honey Bees Resistant to Varroa Destructor
insects Review Geographical Distribution and Selection of European Honey Bees Resistant to Varroa destructor Yves Le Conte 1,* , Marina D. Meixner 2, Annely Brandt 2, Norman L. Carreck 3,4 , Cecilia Costa 5, Fanny Mondet 1 and Ralph Büchler 2 1 INRAE, Abeilles et Environnement, 84914 Avignon, France; [email protected] 2 Landesbetrieb Landwirtschaft Hessen, Bee Institute, Erlenstrasse 9, 35274 Kirchhain, Germany; [email protected] (M.D.M.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (R.B.) 3 Carreck Consultancy Ltd., Woodside Cottage, Dragons Lane, Shipley RH13 8GD, West Sussex, UK; [email protected] 4 Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QG, East Sussex, UK 5 CREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, via di Saliceto 80, 40128 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 October 2020; Accepted: 3 December 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Simple Summary: The parasitic mite Varroa destructor is a major challenge to honey bee populations worldwide. Some honey bee populations are resistant to the mite, but most of the commercially used stocks are not and rely on chemical treatment. In this article, we describe known varroa-resistant populations and the mechanisms which have been identified as responsible for survival of colonies without beekeeper intervention to control the mite. We review traits that have potential in breeding programs, discuss the role played by V. destructor as a vector for virus infections, and the changes in mite and virus virulence which could play a role in colony resistance. -
Affordable Housing Viability - Brief Review
D I S I P Housing & Development Consultants Working for you Harrogate Borough Council -Affordable Housing Viability - Brief Review Ref: DSP 14249 April 2014 Dixon Searle LLP The Old Hayloft 28C Headley Road Grayshott Hindhead GU26 6LD Contents Introduction 2 Property Market Overview 4 Development Costs 18 Sample Appraisals – Results 23 Conclusions 26 i Harrogate BC D|S|P Housing & Development Consultants 1. Introduction 1.1.1 In 2009/2010 Harrogate Borough Council had an Affordable Housing Economic Viability Assessment (AHEVA) carried out to provide part of the evidence base to the Council in developing affordable housing policies for its Sites and Policies Development Plan Document (SAPDPD) – part of the Harrogate District Local Plan. This study used a number of assumptions to test the potential impact of planning policies on development viability at a strategic level including the level of affordable housing (proportion of homes that should be affordable on residential market developments), the point at which it is requested (threshold level) and the tenure. These were correct and reflected practice at the time of undertaking and publishing the study but of course could not have foreseen future changes to a combination of market conditions (values), costs and Government policy. 1.1.2 The research informing the AHEVA (including seeking of soundings from development industry stakeholders) was carried out in the main during September to December 2009, though kept open through to the September 2010 study completion date. 1.1.3 The AHEVA assumptions need to be fixed at a point in time, to allow the appraisal stage to go-ahead. -
201 ,QWHUQDWLRQDO 9Aluation Handbook ,QGXVWU\ Cost of Capital
201,QWHUQDWLRQDO9aluation Handbook ,QGXVWU\ Cost of Capital Market Results Through0DUFK 2015 Duff & Phelps &RPSDQ\/LVW 1RWH 7KLV GRFXPHQW SURYLGHV D OLVW RI WKH FRPSDQLHV XVHG WR SHUIRUP WKH DQDO\VHV SXEOLVKHG LQ WKH ,QWHUQDWLRQDO 9DOXDWLRQ +DQGERRN ̰ ,QGXVWU\ &RVW RI &DSLWDO GDWD WKURXJK 0DUFK 7KHLQIRUPDWLRQ KHUHLQ LV VSHFLILF WR WKH KDUGFRYHU ,QWHUQDWLRQDO 9DOXDWLRQ +DQGERRN ̰,QGXVWU\ &RVW RI &DSLWDO GDWD WKURXJK 0DUFK DQG LV QRW DSSOLFDEOH WR DQ\ RWKHU ERRN XSGDWH RU GRFXPHQW Cover image: Duff & Phelps Cover design: Tim Harms Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. The foregoing does not preclude End-users from using the 2015 International Valuation Handbook ࣓ Industry Cost of Capital and data published therein in connection with their internal business operations.