DOCSLIB.ORG

Funding Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Funding Report PROGRAMS I STATE CASH FLOW * R FED CASH FLOW * COMPARE REPORT U INTRASTATE * LOOPS * UNFUNDED * FEASIBILITY * DIVISION 7 TYPE OF WORK / ESTIMATED COST IN THOUSANDS / PROJECT BREAK TOTAL PRIOR STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJ YEARS 5 YEAR WORK PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM "UNFUNDED" LOCATION / DESCRIPTION COST COST FUNDING ID (LENGTH) ROUTE/CITY COUNTY NUMBER (THOU) (THOU) SOURCE FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FUTURE YEARS 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) I-40/85 ALAMANCE I-4714 NC 49 (MILE POST 145) TO NC 54 (MILE 7551 7551 IMPM CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 POST 148). MILL AND RESURFACE. (2.8 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) PROJECT COMPLETE - GARVEE BOND FUNDING $4.4 MILLION; PAYBACK FY 2007 - FY 2018 I-40/85 ALAMANCE I-4714 NC 49 (MILEPOST 145) TO NC 54 (MILEPOST 5898 869 IMPM CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 479 CG 1676 148). MILL AND RESURFACE. (2.8 MILES) PROJECT COMPLETE - GARVEE BOND FUNDING $4.4 MILLION; PAYBACK FY 2007 - FY 2018 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) I-40/I-85 ALAMANCE I-4918 NC 54 (MILE POST 148) IN ALAMANCE COUNTY 9361 9361 IMPM CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 TO WEST OF SR 1114 (BUCKHORN ROAD) IN ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY. MILL AND RESURFACE. (8.3 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) PROJECT COMPLETE - GARVEE BOND FUNDING $12.0 MILLION; PAYBACK FY 2007 - FY 2018 I-40/I-85 ALAMANCE I-4918 NC 54 (MILEPOST 148) IN ALAMANCE COUNTY 15906 2120 IMPM CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 1313 CG 4595 TO WEST OF SR 1114 (BUCKHORN ROAD) IN ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY. MILL AND RESURFACE. (8.3 MILES) UNDER CONSTRUCTION - GARVEE BOND FUNDING $12.0 MILLION; PAYBACK FY 2007 - FY 2018 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) I-40, I-73 AND I-85 ALAMANCE I-5207 INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE PRESERVATION 11550 IMPM C 1155 C 1155 C 1155 C 1155 C 1155 C 1155 C 1155 C 1155 C 1155 C 1155 GUILFORD FOR DIVISION 7. ORANGE 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) I-40 / I-85 ALAMANCE I-5309 EAST OF GUILFORD COUNTY LINE 6575 IMPM C 6575 TO EAST OF NC 49. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION. (5.8 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) I-40 / I-85 ALAMANCE I-5362 EAST OF NC 49 TO EAST OF NC 54. 3050 IMPM C 3050 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION. (2.7 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) I-40 / I-85 ALAMANCE I-5380 EAST OF NC 54 IN ALAMANCE COUNTY TO 8800 IMPM C 8800 WEST OF SR 1114 (BUCKHORN ROAD) IN ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION. (7.8 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) I-40 / I-85 ALAMANCE I-5392 EAST OF SR 3056 (ROCK CREEK DAIRY ROAD) 4500 IMPM C 4500 IN GUILFORD COUNTY TO WEST GUILFORD OF UNIVERSITY DRIVE (EXIT 140) IN ALAMANCE COUNTY. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION. (4 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) Tuesday, August 03, 2010 Page 1 of 21 TYPE OF WORK / ESTIMATED COST IN THOUSANDS / PROJECT BREAK TOTAL PRIOR STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJ YEARS 5 YEAR WORK PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM "UNFUNDED" LOCATION / DESCRIPTION COST COST FUNDING ID (LENGTH) ROUTE/CITY COUNTY NUMBER (THOU) (THOU) SOURCE FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FUTURE YEARS 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) US 70 ALAMANCE R-2910 SR 3056 IN GUILFORD COUNTY TO 21108 8 STP R 1900 SR 1309 IN ALAMANCE COUNTY. STP C 9600 C 9600 GUILFORD WIDEN TO MULTI-LANES WITH CURB AND GUTTER. (5.4 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) PLANNING/DESIGN IN PROGRESS US 70 ALAMANCE R-2910 SR 3056 IN GUILFORD COUNTY TO 15358 8 STP R 1900 SR 1309 IN ALAMANCE COUNTY. STP C 13450 GUILFORD WIDEN TO MULTI-LANES WITH CURB AND GUTTER. (5.4 MILES) PROGRAMMED FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY ONLY 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) NC 49-62 ALAMANCE R-2543 US 70 IN HAW RIVER TO US 158 IN 40350 STP R 2350 YANCEYVILLE. UPGRADE ROADWAY STP C 38000 CASWELL AND CONSTRUCT MULTI-LANES AT SELECTED LOCATIONS. (30.9 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) NC 49-62 ALAMANCE R-2543 US 70 IN HAW RIVER TO US 158 IN 40350 STP R 2350 CASWELL YANCEYVILLE. UPGRADE ROADWAY STP C 38000 AND CONSTRUCT MULTI-LANES AT SELECTED LOCATIONS. (30.9 MILES) 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) NC 87 ALAMANCE R-2560 SR 1547 IN ALAMANCE COUNTY TO US 29 82733 3733 STP R 4400 A IN REIDSVILLE. WIDEN TO MULTI-LANES. (19.1 STP C 18900 A CASWELL MILES) STP R 3500 B ROCKINGHAM STP C 16200 B STP R 3500 C STP C 15200 C STP R 3100 DA STP C 14200 DA 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) NC 87 ALAMANCE R-2560 SR 1547 IN ALAMANCE COUNTY TO US 29 82733 3733 STP R 4400 A IN REIDSVILLE. WIDEN TO MULTI-LANES. (19.1 STP C 18900 A CASWELL MILES) STP R 3500 B ROCKINGHAM STP C 16200 B STP R 3500 C STP C 15200 C STP R 3100 DA STP C 14200 DA 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) NC 119 ALAMANCE R-3105 SOUTH OF SR 1917 IN ALAMANCE 24200 STP R 3000 COUNTY TO NC 62 IN CASWELL COUNTY. C 21200 CASWELL STP WIDEN NC 119 IN ALAMANCE COUNTY TO SR 1901 AND CONSTRUCT A CONNECTOR TO NC 62 ON NEW LOCATION. (10 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) NC 119 ALAMANCE R-3105 SOUTH OF SR 1917 IN ALAMANCE 24200 STP R 3000 COUNTY TO NC 62 IN CASWELL COUNTY. STP C 21200 CASWELL WIDEN NC 119 IN ALAMANCE COUNTY TO SR 1901 AND CONSTRUCT A CONNECTOR TO NC 62 ON NEW LOCATION. (10 MILES) 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) VARIOUS ALAMANCE R-5175 RESURFACING ON FEDERAL-AID ROUTES. 3987 3987 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) Tuesday, August 03, 2010 Page 2 of 21 TYPE OF WORK / ESTIMATED COST IN THOUSANDS / PROJECT BREAK TOTAL PRIOR STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJ YEARS 5 YEAR WORK PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM "UNFUNDED" LOCATION / DESCRIPTION COST COST FUNDING ID (LENGTH) ROUTE/CITY COUNTY NUMBER (THOU) (THOU) SOURCE FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FUTURE YEARS 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) VARIOUS ALAMANCE U-5170 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS. 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) WORK INCLUDED UNDER U-5155 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-2906B NC 62 (ALAMANCE ROAD), SR 1430 4550 S R 1300 (RAMADA ROAD) TO US 70 (CHURCH S C 3250 STREET). WIDEN TO MULTI-LANES WITH CURB AND GUTTER. (1.2 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) PROJECT U-2906A - COMPLETE BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-2906B NC 62 (ALAMANCE ROAD), SR 1430 4550 S R 1300 (RAMADA ROAD) TO US 70 (CHURCH S C 3250 STREET). WIDEN TO MULTI-LANES WITH CURB AND GUTTER. (1.2 MILES) PROJECT U-2906A - COMPLETE 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-2907 NC 54, NC 100 (MAPLE AVENUE) TO 10574 350 STP R 3324 US 70 (CHURCH STREET). WIDEN STP C 6900 TO MULTI- LANES WITH CURB AND GUTTER. (2.2 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) PLANNING/DESIGN IN PROGRESS BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-2907 NC 54, NC 100 (MAPLE AVENUE) TO 10574 350 STP R 3324 US 70 (CHURCH STREET). WIDEN STP C 6900 TO MULTI- LANES WITH CURB AND PLANNING/DESIGN IN PROGRESS GUTTER. (2.2 MILES) 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-3303 SR 1306-SR 1363 (MEBANE STREET), 42733 42733 SR 1158 (HUFFMAN MILL ROAD) TO NC 54 (CHAPEL HILL ROAD). WIDEN TO MULTI-LANES. (2.4 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) UNDER CONSTRUCTION BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-3303 SR 1306-SR 1363 (MEBANE STREET), 38245 19645 STP C 6200 C 6200 C 6200 SR 1158 (HUFFMAN MILL ROAD) TO RIGHT OF WAY IN PROGRESS NC 54 (CHAPEL HILL ROAD). WIDEN TO MULTI-LANES. (2.4 MILES) 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-3304 GRAND OAKS BOULEVARD EXTENSION, 10355 10355 SR 1146 (KIRKPATRICK ROAD) TO NC 62 (ALAMANCE ROAD). WIDEN TO MULTI- LANES, SOME NEW LOCATION. (1.1 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) UNDER CONSTRUCTION BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-3304 GRAND OAKS BOULEVARD EXTENSION, 9271 9271 SR 1146 (KIRKPATRICK ROAD) TO NC 62 UNDER CONSTRUCTION (ALAMANCE ROAD). WIDEN TO MULTI- LANES, SOME NEW LOCATION. (1.1 MILES) 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-3407 SOUTHERN LOOP, NC 62 AT GRAND 35900 STP R 7700 OAKS BOULEVARD TO NC 87. WIDEN STP C 28200 TO MULTI-LANES AND CONSTRUCT MULTI-LANE CONNECTORS ON NEW LOCATION. (5.3 MILES) 2009-2015 TIP (June 2008) BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-3407 SOUTHERN LOOP, NC 62 AT GRAND OAKS 35900 STP R 7700 BOULEVARD TO NC 87. WIDEN TO MULTI- STP C 28200 LANES AND CONSTRUCT MULTI-LANE CONNECTORS ON NEW LOCATION. (5.3 MILES) Tuesday, August 03, 2010 Page 3 of 21 TYPE OF WORK / ESTIMATED COST IN THOUSANDS / PROJECT BREAK TOTAL PRIOR STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJ YEARS 5 YEAR WORK PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM "UNFUNDED" LOCATION / DESCRIPTION COST COST FUNDING ID (LENGTH) ROUTE/CITY COUNTY NUMBER (THOU) (THOU) SOURCE FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FUTURE YEARS 2011-2020 Draft TIP (August 2010) BURLINGTON ALAMANCE U-5152 NC 87 (WEBB STREET) AND ELMIRA STREET.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Greensboro, North Carolina
    Ratings: Fitch: AAA Moody’s: Aaa S&P: AAA (See “RATINGS” herein) PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 2018 New Issue – Book-Entry Only the Official Statement is delivered in final hich such offer, solicitation or sale would be This Official Statement has been prepared by the Local Government Commission of North Carolina and the City of Greensboro, North Carolina (the “City”) to provide information in connection with the sale and issuance of the bonds described herein (the “2018A Bonds” and the “2018B Bonds,” respectively, and collectively, the “Bonds”). Selected information is presented on this cover page for the convenience of the user. To make an informed decision regarding the Bonds, a prospective investor should read this Official Statement in its entirety. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms used on this cover page have the meanings given in this Official Statement. City of Greensboro, North Carolina $10,400,000 $135,360,000* Taxable General Obligation General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds Public Improvement Bonds Series 2018A Series 2018B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: October 1, as shown on the inside cover page Tax Treatment: In the opinion of Bond Counsel, based on existing law, interest on the 2018A Bonds will not be excluded from gross income for purposes of ities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time federal income taxation imposed by the Code. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, which is based on existing law and assumes continuing compliance by the City with certain covenants to comply with the offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in w provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), interest on the 2018B Bonds will not be includable in the gross income of the owners thereof for purposes of federal income taxation and will not be a specific preference item for purposes of the alternative minimum tax imposed by the Code.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUND the BEND TEAM Being Through Our Efforts
    Round the bend Farm A CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE COMMUNITY 1 LETTER FROM THE It’s been an AMAZING monarch year for us here at RTB. We even offered CO-VISIONARIES a monarch class in July Desa & Nia Van Laarhoven and we’ve been hatching & Geoff Kinder some at RTB to increase s fall descends on Round the Bend Farm their odds. (RTB), vivid colors mark the passage of time. Autumn’s return grounds us amid Aeach day’s frenetic news cycles. It reminds us of the deeper cycle that connects us all to the earth and to each other. And yet one news story, from late September, has done the same. More than 7.5 million people came together in cities and villages across the planet to call in unison for an environmentally just and sustainable world. This is a story that speaks to RTB’s mission and purpose and demonstrates the concept of Restorative Community that’s so central to our existence. You can see it in the image that juxtaposed September’s global crowds with the prior year’s solitary Swedish protester. You can hear it in the words spoken by an Indigenous Brazilian teen to 250,000 people lining the streets of New York City. Restorative Community is a force multiplier for our own personal commitments to justice, health and peace. It nurtures and supports us as individuals, unites and strengthens us as a movement and harnesses our differences in service of our common goals. In community, we respect, enjoy and learn from each other. As you page through this year’s annual report, we hope you experience the same! We’re This past year, we continued to expand our inspired and encouraged by what we’ve Restorative Community at RTB, more than accomplished this year and we’re honored to doubling the number of people who visited serve our community in ever new ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Unintended Consequences of the American Presidential Selection System
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLP\15-1\HLP104.txt unknown Seq: 1 14-JUL-21 12:54 The Best Laid Plans: Unintended Consequences of the American Presidential Selection System Samuel S.-H. Wang and Jacob S. Canter* The mechanism for selecting the President of the United States, the Electoral College, causes outcomes that weaken American democracy and that the delegates at the Constitu- tional Convention never intended. The core selection process described in Article II, Section 1 was hastily drawn in the final days of the Convention based on compromises made originally to benefit slave-owning states and states with smaller populations. The system was also drafted to have electors deliberate and then choose the President in an age when travel and news took weeks or longer to cross the new country. In the four decades after ratification, the Electoral College was modified further to reach its current form, which includes most states using a winner-take-all method to allocate electors. The original needs this system was designed to address have now disappeared. But the persistence of these Electoral College mechanisms still causes severe unanticipated problems, including (1) con- tradictions between the electoral vote winner and national popular vote winner, (2) a “battleground state” phenomenon where all but a handful of states are safe for one political party or the other, (3) representational and policy benefits that citizens in only some states receive, (4) a decrease in the political power of non-battleground demographic groups, and (5) vulnerability of elections to interference. These outcomes will not go away without intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Next-Gen Technology Transformation in Financial Services
    April 2020 Next-gen Technology transformation in Financial Services Introduction Financial Services technology is currently in the midst of a profound transformation, as CIOs and their teams prepare to embrace the next major phase of digital transformation. The challenge they face is significant: in a competitive environment of rising cost pressures, where rapid action and response is imperative, financial institutions must modernize their technology function to support expanded digitization of both the front and back ends of their businesses. Furthermore, the current COVID-19 situation is putting immense pressure on technology capabilities (e.g., remote working, new cyber-security threats) and requires CIOs to anticipate and prepare for the “next normal” (e.g., accelerated shift to digital channels). Most major financial institutions are well aware of the imperative for action and have embarked on the necessary transformation. However, it is early days—based on our experience, most are only at the beginning of their journey. And in addition to the pressures mentioned above, many are facing challenges in terms of funding, complexity, and talent availability. This collection of articles—gathered from our recent publishing on the theme of financial services technology—is intended to serve as a roadmap for executives tasked with ramping up technology innovation, increasing tech productivity, and modernizing their platforms. The articles are organized into three major themes: 1. Reimagine the role of technology to be a business and innovation partner 2. Reinvent technology delivery to drive a step change in productivity and speed 3. Future-proof the foundation by building flexible and secure platforms The pace of change in financial services technology—as with technology more broadly—leaves very little time for leaders to respond.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Guidebook
    SUSTAINABILITY GUIDEBOOK ©LEVI STRAUSS & CO. | December 2013 | Sustainability Guidebook Table of Contents Introduction Ratings defined Chapter One – Labor Standards 1. Child Labor 2. Prison Labor/Forced Labor 3. Disciplinary Practices 4. Legal Requirements 5. Ethical Standards 6. Working Hours 7. Wages and Benefits 8. General Labor Practices and Freedom of Association 9. Discrimination 10. Community Involvement 11. Foreign Migrant Labor 12. Dormitories 13. Permits Chapter Two – Environment, Health & Safety Part I : Safety Guidelines 1. Safety Committees 2. Risk Assessment 3. Emergency Preparedness 4. Building Integrity 5. Aisles and Exits 6. Lighting 7. Housekeeping 8. Electrical Safety 9. Control of Hazardous Energy/Lock‐Out/Tag‐Out 10. Machine Guarding 11. Powered Industrial Trucks 12. Noise Management 13. Personal Protective Equipment 14. Ventilation 15. Chemical Management 16. Extreme Temperatures 17. Asbestos Management 18. Occupational Exposure Limits 19. Signs and Labels 20. Maintenance Part II : Finishing Guidelines 1. Finishing Safety Guidelines 2. Hand Scraping 3. Laser Etching 4. Resin/Curing 5. Screen Printing 6. Spraying 7. Abrasive Blasting 8. Ozone Part III : Health Guidelines 1. First Aid 2. Preventing Communicable Disease Part IV : Environment Guidelines 1. Global Effluent Requirements 2. Domestic Wastewater Requirements 3. Biosolids Management 4. Waste Management 2.1 Transporting Hazardous Materials 2.2 Hazardous Waste Management 2.3 Solid Waste Management 5. Preventing Storm Water Pollution 6. Aboveground/Underground Storage ©LEVI STRAUSS & CO. | December 2013 | Sustainability Guidebook | Table of contents | page 1 Appendix A : SAFETY GUIDELINES 1. Safety Committees 2. Emergency Preparedness 3. Aisles and Exits 4. Housekeeping Checklist 5. Electrical Safety Inspection Checklist 6. Lock‐Out/Tag‐Out 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Ncbr (Fastlane)
    APPLICANT CONTACT Port of Moses Lake Jeffrey Bishop, Executive Director 7810 Andrews N.E. Suite 200 Moses Lake, WA 98837 Port of Moses Lake www.portofmoseslake.com [email protected] Project Name Northern Columbia Basin Railroad Project Was a FASTLANE application for this project submitted previously? Yes If yes, what was the name of the project in the previous application? Northern Columbia Basin Railroad Project Previously Incurred Project Costs $2.1 million Future Eligible Project Costs $30.3 million Total Project Costs $32.4 million Total Federal Funding (including FASTLANE) $9.9 million Are matching funds restricted to a specific project component? If so, No which one? Is the project of a portion of the project currently located on Yes National Highway Freight Network? Is the project of a portion on the project located on the NHS? This project crosses under the NHS as well is it runs adjacent to the NHS Does the project add capacity to the Interstate system? Yes, by diverting VMT to rail Is the project in a national scenic area? No Does the project components include a railway-highway grade No crossing or grade separation project? The project includes crossing If so, please include the grade crossing ID improvements. Do the project components include an intermodal or freight rail Yes project, or freight project within the boundaries of a public or private freight rail, water (including ports, or intermodal facility? If answered yes to either of the two component questions above, $9.9 million how much of requested FASTLANE
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Culture Studies Journal
    THE POPULAR CULTURE STUDIES JOURNAL VOLUME 6 NUMBER 1 2018 Editor NORMA JONES Liquid Flicks Media, Inc./IXMachine Managing Editor JULIA LARGENT McPherson College Assistant Editor GARRET L. CASTLEBERRY Mid-America Christian University Copy Editor Kevin Calcamp Queens University of Charlotte Reviews Editor MALYNNDA JOHNSON Indiana State University Assistant Reviews Editor JESSICA BENHAM University of Pittsburgh Please visit the PCSJ at: http://mpcaaca.org/the-popular-culture- studies-journal/ The Popular Culture Studies Journal is the official journal of the Midwest Popular and American Culture Association. Copyright © 2018 Midwest Popular and American Culture Association. All rights reserved. MPCA/ACA, 421 W. Huron St Unit 1304, Chicago, IL 60654 Cover credit: Cover Artwork: “Wrestling” by Brent Jones © 2018 Courtesy of https://openclipart.org EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD ANTHONY ADAH FALON DEIMLER Minnesota State University, Moorhead University of Wisconsin-Madison JESSICA AUSTIN HANNAH DODD Anglia Ruskin University The Ohio State University AARON BARLOW ASHLEY M. DONNELLY New York City College of Technology (CUNY) Ball State University Faculty Editor, Academe, the magazine of the AAUP JOSEF BENSON LEIGH H. EDWARDS University of Wisconsin Parkside Florida State University PAUL BOOTH VICTOR EVANS DePaul University Seattle University GARY BURNS JUSTIN GARCIA Northern Illinois University Millersville University KELLI S. BURNS ALEXANDRA GARNER University of South Florida Bowling Green State University ANNE M. CANAVAN MATTHEW HALE Salt Lake Community College Indiana University, Bloomington ERIN MAE CLARK NICOLE HAMMOND Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota University of California, Santa Cruz BRIAN COGAN ART HERBIG Molloy College Indiana University - Purdue University, Fort Wayne JARED JOHNSON ANDREW F. HERRMANN Thiel College East Tennessee State University JESSE KAVADLO MATTHEW NICOSIA Maryville University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Buildings Residential Network Peer Exchange Call Series
    2_Title Slide Better Buildings Residential Network Peer Exchange Call Series: Addressing Barriers to Upgrade Projects at Affordable Multifamily Properties (201) March 10, 2016 Call Slides and Discussion Summary Call Attendee Locations 2 Call Participants – Network Members . Alabama Energy Doctors . Greater Cincinnati Energy Alliance . Alaska Housing Finance Corporation . green|spaces . American Council for an Energy-Efficient . GRID Alternatives Economy (ACEEE) . International Center for Appropriate and . Austin Energy Sustainable Technology (ICAST) . BlueGreen Alliance Foundation . Johnson Environmental . Bridging The Gap . Metropolitan Washington Council of . CalCERTS, Inc. Governments (MWCOG) . Center for Sustainable Energy . Michigan Saves . City of Aspen Utilities and Environmental . National Grid (Rhode Island) Initiatives . National Housing Trust/Enterprise . City of Kansas City, Missouri . PUSH Buffalo . City of Plano . Research Into Action, Inc. CLEAResult . Solar and Energy Loan Fund (SELF) . District of Columbia Sustainable Energy . Southface Utility . Stewards of Affordable Housing for the . Duke Carbon Offsets Initiative Future . EcoWorks . Vermont Energy Investment Corporation . Elevate Energy (VEIC) . Energize New York . Wisconsin Energy Conservation . Energy Efficiency Specialists Corporation (WECC) . Fujitsu General America Inc. Yolo County Housing 3 Call Participants – Non-Members (1 of 3) . Affordable Community Energy . City of Chicago . AppleBlossom Energy Inc. City of Minneapolis . Architectural Nexus . City of Orlando
    [Show full text]
  • Battleground 2014 (XLIII)
    Battleground 2014 (XLIII) FINAL STUDY #14107 THE TARRANCE GROUP and LAKE RESEARCH PARTNERS N = 1,000 Registered “likely” voters Margin of error + 3.1% Field Dates: January 12-16, 2014 Hello, I'm _______________ of The Tarrance Group, a national survey research firm. We're talking to people today about public leaders and issues facing us all. IF CELL CODE = “N”, ASK: May I please speak with the youngest (male/female) in the household who is registered to vote? IF CELL CODE = “Y”, ASK: CP-1. Do you currently live in (state from cell sample sheet)? Yes (CONTINUE TO CP-3) No (CONTINUE TO CP-2) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ IF “NO” IN CP-1, ASK: CP-2. In what state do you current reside? __________________________ (RECORD STATE NAME) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ IF CELL CODE = “Y”, ASK: CP-3. For your safety, are you driving right now? Yes (SCHEDULE CALL BACK) No _____________________________________________________________________________________________ A. Are you registered to vote in your state? IF "NO," ASK: Is there someone else at home who is registered to vote? (IF "YES," THEN ASK: MAY I SPEAK WITH HIM/HER?) Yes (CONTINUE) No (THANK AND TERMINATE) *=less than .5% 1 And… B. What is the likelihood of your voting in the elections for US Congress that will be held in November 2014-- are you extremely likely, very likely, somewhat likely, or not very likely at all to vote? Extremely Likely ..................................................... 60% (CONTINUE) Very Likely .............................................................. 27% Somewhat Likely ..................................................... 13% (THANK AND TERMINATE) Not Very Likely UNSURE (DNR) (UPELECT) C. Are you, or is anyone in your household, employed with an advertising agency, newspaper, television or radio station, or political campaign? Yes (THANK AND TERMINATE) No (CONTINUE) Now, thinking for a moment about things in the country-- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atlantic Return and the Payback of Evangelization
    Vol. 3, no. 2 (2013), 207-221 | URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-114482 The Atlantic Return and the Payback of Evangelization VALENTINA NAPOLITANO* Abstract This article explores Catholic, transnational Latin American migration to Rome as a gendered and ethnicized Atlantic Return, which is figured as a source of ‘new blood’ that fortifies the Catholic Church but which also profoundly unset- tles it. I analyze this Atlantic Return as an angle on the affective force of his- tory in critical relation to two main sources: Diego Von Vacano’s reading of the work of Bartolomeo de las Casas, a 16th-century Spanish Dominican friar; and to Nelson Maldonado-Torres’ notion of the ‘coloniality of being’ which he suggests has operated in Atlantic relations as enduring and present forms of racial de-humanization. In his view this latter can be counterbalanced by embracing an economy of the gift understood as gendered. However, I argue that in the light of a contemporary payback of evangelization related to the original ‘gift of faith’ to the Americas, this economy of the gift is less liberatory than Maldonado-Torres imagines, and instead part of a polyfaceted reproduc- tion of a postsecular neoliberal affective, and gendered labour regime. Keywords Transnational migration; Catholicism; economy of the gift; de Certeau; Atlantic Return; Latin America; Rome. Author affiliation Valentina Napolitano is an Associate Professor in the Department of Anthro- pology and the Director of the Latin American Studies Program, University of *Correspondence: Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, 19 Russell St., Toronto, M5S 2S2, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (3.0) Religion and Gender | ISSN: 1878-5417 | www.religionandgender.org | Igitur publishing Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 10:21:12AM via free access Napolitano: The Atlantic Return and the Payback of Evangelization Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding On-Farm Anaerobic Digestion September 2012
    Funding On-Farm Anaerobic Digestion September 2012 naerobic digestion of on-farm manure resources offers Some examples of programs where federal and state agencies livestock and poultry producers (farm operators) a unique provide grant funding for the construction and operation of Aopportunity to increase on-farm revenue. As energy costs anaerobic digesters include the U.S. Department of Agriculture become a larger part of the farm operation budget, farm operators (USDA) Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) and Ohio’s are increasingly looking to energy efficiency and renewable energy State Energy Program. In some cases, federal-level funding projects as a viable option for increasing farm revenues. One such sources (i.e., American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, option is anaerobic digestion of animal manure, a waste resource or ARRA) provide states with grant money that is administered at that has considerable potential for generating clean, renewable, the state level. For additional information on funding programs domestic energy. available for anaerobic digesters, see the fact sheet Funding Programs for Developing Anaerobic Digestion Systems (http:// One of the biggest obstacles to widespread adoption of on-farm www.epa.gov/agstar/documents/agstar_federal_incentives.pdf), anaerobic digestion has been its cost. Anaerobic digesters require and also the AgSTAR Funding database, Funding On-Farm Biogas significant amounts of up-front capital costs (expenditures), in Recovery Systems: A Guide to Federal and State Resources (http://
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Standards, Thresholds, and the Next Battleground of Climate Change Regulations
    Article Environmental Standards, Thresholds, and the Next Battleground of Climate Change Regulations Kimberly M. Castle† and Richard L. Revesz†† Introduction .......................................................................... 1350 I. Traditional Risk Assessment Models ............................. 1363 A. Carcinogens ............................................................... 1363 B. Noncarcinogens Other than Criteria Pollutants ..... 1371 II. Treatment of Criteria Pollutants ................................... 1377 A. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 ......................... 1378 B. Shift in the EPA’s Approach: A Case Study of Lead ....................................................................... 1383 C. Rejecting Thresholds and Calculating Benefits Below the NAAQS .................................................... 1391 III. Calculating Health Benefits from Particulate Matter Reductions Below the NAAQS ....................................... 1397 A. Scientific Basis .......................................................... 1400 B. Regulatory Treatment .............................................. 1409 C. Addressing Uncertainty ........................................... 1413 D. Adjusting Baselines .................................................. 1417 IV. Considering Co-Benefits ................................................. 1421 A. Co-Benefits and Indirect Costs ................................ 1424 B. The EPA’s Practice ................................................... 1427 † Research Scholar, Institute
    [Show full text]