SR January 2011
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Woman-Slave Analogy: Rhetorical Foundations in American
The Woman-Slave Analogy: Rhetorical Foundations in American Culture, 1830-1900 Ana Lucette Stevenson BComm (dist.), BA (HonsI) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics I Abstract During the 1830s, Sarah Grimké, the abolitionist and women’s rights reformer from South Carolina, stated: “It was when my soul was deeply moved at the wrongs of the slave that I first perceived distinctly the subject condition of women.” This rhetorical comparison between women and slaves – the woman-slave analogy – emerged in Europe during the seventeenth century, but gained peculiar significance in the United States during the nineteenth century. This rhetoric was inspired by the Revolutionary Era language of liberty versus tyranny, and discourses of slavery gained prominence in the reform culture that was dominated by the American antislavery movement and shared among the sisterhood of reforms. The woman-slave analogy functioned on the idea that the position of women was no better – nor any freer – than slaves. It was used to critique the exclusion of women from a national body politic based on the concept that “all men are created equal.” From the 1830s onwards, this analogy came to permeate the rhetorical practices of social reformers, especially those involved in the antislavery, women’s rights, dress reform, suffrage and labour movements. Sarah’s sister, Angelina, asked: “Can you not see that women could do, and would do a hundred times more for the slave if she were not fettered?” My thesis explores manifestations of the woman-slave analogy through the themes of marriage, fashion, politics, labour, and sex. -
Pan Tadeusz by Adam Mickiewicz
The Project Gutenberg EBook of Pan Tadeusz by Adam Mickiewicz This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: Pan Tadeusz Author: Adam Mickiewicz Release Date: [Ebook 28240] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PAN TADEUSZ*** PAN TADEUSZ OR THE LAST FORAY IN LITHUANIA All rights reserved PAN TADEUSZ OR THE LAST FORAY IN LITHUANIA A STORY OF LIFE AMONG POLISH GENTLEFOLK IN THE YEARS 1811 AND 1812 IN TWELVE BOOKS BY ADAM MICKIEWICZ TRANSLATED FROM THE POLISH BY GEORGE RAPALL NOYES 1917 LONDON AND TORONTO J. M. DENT & SONS LTD. PARIS: J. M. DENT ET FILS NEW YORK: E. P. DUTTON & CO. Contents PREFACE . 1 INTRODUCTION . 3 LIST OF THE PRINCIPAL CHARACTERS IN “PAN TADEUSZ” WITH NOTES ON POLISH PRONUN- CIATION . 14 BOOK I.—THE FARM . 17 BOOK II.—THE CASTLE . 45 BOOK III.—FLIRTATION . 69 BOOK IV—DIPLOMACY AND THE CHASE . 91 BOOK V.—THE BRAWL . 120 BOOK VI.—THE HAMLET . 146 BOOK VII.—THE CONSULTATION . 164 BOOK VIII.—THE FORAY . 181 BOOK IX.—THE BATTLE . 204 BOOK X—THE EMIGRATION. JACEK . 226 BOOK XI.—THE YEAR 1812 . 253 BOOK XII.—LET US LOVE ONE ANOTHER! . 273 NOTES . 299 [v] PREFACE THE present translation of Pan Tadeusz is based on the editions of Biegeleisen (Lemberg, 1893) and Kallenbach (Brody, 1911). I have had constantly by me the German translation by Lipiner (ed. -
Show of the Week Th Until 9 February
12 AGENDA The Minsk Times Thursday, February 6, 2014 Exhibitions NATIONAL ART MUSEUM OF BELARUS 20 Lenin Street Show of the week th Until 9 February. The Teacher and His Pupils (P. Maslennikov) Until 16th February. Portrait of Ludwik Kondratowicz Władysław Syrokomla: single painting exhibition by Adam Szemesz, on loan from the Lithuanian Art Museum Until 18th February. Exhibition, dedicated to the Year of Horse Until 23rd February. Ten Masterpieces. Artistic Works from the Collections of the National Art Museum of Belarus Until 2nd March. Bystanders of the Time. The Portrait of the Russian Painting and Graphics of the 18th-20th Century Until 18th April 2014. Slutsk Belts NATIONAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF BELARUS 12 Karl Marx Street Until 23rd February. Treasures of Ukraine Until 23rd February. Parnat 84-11B HOUSE-MUSEUM OF FIRST RSDRP CONGRESS 31/А Nezavisimosti Avenue Until 9th March. Portrait of a Contemporary MIR CASTLE Until 30th May. Spirit of Time and Luxury: 1820- 1920s Fashion and Style MIKHAIL SAVITSKY ART GALLERY 15 Svobody Square Until 9th February. Leonid ALEXANDER RUZHECHKA Shchemelev’s XX, XXI… Belarusian State Circus hosts the opening night of a new spectacular programme Until 9th March. Transformation Theatres NATIONAL ACADEMIC BOLSHOI OPERA AND BALLET THEATRE Kaleidoscope of history unveiled 1 Parizhskoy Kommuny Square February of decades and centuries past comes to life 07.02. Tamar. Scheherazade 08.02. Turandot 09.02. Anyuta 11.02. Tosca 12.02. Vytautas February 7th. In 1889, a Belarusian of Agricultural Mechanisation, the main February 12th. In 1839, the Polotsk 13.02. Prince Igor and Russian weightlifter and a founder of block of a tourist facility and a complex Church Convocation annulled Brest’s BELARUSIAN STATE ACADEMIC the kettlebell lifting and wrestling Arkady of Sosny recreation facility (on Lake Na- church unia of 1596; as a result, the Uniat MUSICAL THEATRE Alexandrovich was born in Minsk. -
Kresy | the Borderlands
Kresy | The Borderlands Kresy The Borderlands „Z całego mnóstwa różnorodnych typów ludzkich wyłania się wyraźnie grupa ludzi o instynktach wiejskich, ludzi, którym dobrze jest tylko tam »gdzie żaden płot, rów żaden drogi nie utrudza, gdzie przestępując miedzę nie poznasz, że cudza«; ludzi, którzy nie uświadamiają sobie nawet przyczyn, dlaczego tak jest, czują się u siebie, na swobodzie, gdy im zapachnie świeże powietrze borów, gdy usłyszą miękki szum ławic oczeretów, gdy widzą fale zbóż płynące z wiatrem po wzgórzach, gdy słyszą jęk czajki nad zielonym morzem łąk, gdy patrzą na dalekie widnokręgi, obramione siną wstęgą lasów. W instynktach tych ludzi leży życie nienormowane, nieukrócone, jak w ich pra- gnieniach i tradycjach leży podnieta do czynów wychodzących poza spokojne, regularne, ciche i pracowite wytwarzanie i zjadanie chleba. Dla wszystkich takich natur Ukraina była ziemią marzeń. Wyrazy: step, Kozak, czu- mak, porohy, futor, jar, czajki, miały szczególny urok i pociąg. Przy ówczesnym stanie sztuki ilustracyjnej, przy braku fotografii, gdzieś na Żmudzi i Litwie albo Mazowszu rzeczy, do których te nazwy należały, nie dały się nawet wyobrazić konkretnie, jednak wiał z nich jakiś czar tęsknoty, jakaś woń upajająca i »matka Ukraina« dla dziecka uro- dzonego gdzieś nad Dubiską lub Willą zdawała się naprawdę matką…” (Stanisław Witkiewicz, Juliusz Kossak, s. 34) Kresy Wschodnie zajmują szczególne miejsce w dziejach Rzeczpospolitej – i to zarówno pod względem historycznym, jak i sentymentalnym. Na przestrzeni wieków utrwalił się swoisty -
Oglądaj/Open
POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK • INSTYTUT NAUK PRAWNYCH ZAKŁAD KRYMINOLOGII ARCHIWUM KRYMINOLOGII Archives of Criminology TOM XLIII NUMER 1 2021 Volume XLIII number 1/2021 Editor-in-Chief: prof. Witold Klaus (Institute of Law Studies PAS, Poland) Executive Editor: dr Justyna Włodarczyk-Madejska (Institute of Law Studies PAS, Poland) Chairwomen of the Editorial Committee: prof. Irena Rzeplińska (Institute of Law Studies PAS, emeritus, Poland) Statistical editor: prof. Beata Gruszczyńska (University of Warsaw, Poland) Linguistic editor: Marta Mądziel Proofreading: Eric Hilton Graphic design and composition and breaking the publication: Grzegorz Gromulski Editorial Committee: Marcelo F. Aebi (University of Lausanne, Switzerland), Ivo Aertsen (Catholic University Leuven, Belgium), Aleksandras Dobryninas (Vilnius University, Lithuania), Ioan Durnescu (University of Bucharest, Romania), Frieder Dünkel (University of Greifswald, Germany), Uberto Gatti (University of Genoa, Italy), Yakov Gilinskiy (Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia), Beata Gruszczyńska (University of Warsaw, Poland), Katalin Gönczöl (Hungarian Society of Criminology, Hungary), Éva Inzelt (Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary), Witold Klaus (Institute of Law Studies PAS, Poland), Krzysztof Krajewski (Jagiellonian University, Poland), Barbara Kunicka- Michalska (Institute of Law Studies PAS, emeritus, Poland), Helmut Kury (University of Freiburg, Germany), Zbigniew Lasocik (University of Warsaw, Poland), Miklós Lévay (Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary), Agnieszka Martynowicz (Edge Hill University, -
Janusz Jędrzejewicz
2 Zbigniew Osi ński Janusz J ędrzejewicz – piłsudczyk i reformator edukacji (1885 – 1951) Wydanie drugie, poprawione i uzupełnione. Lublin 2008 Wydanie pierwsze ukazało si ę w 2007 r. nakładem Wydawnictwa UMCS w Lublinie. ISBN 978-83-227-2704-1 Recenzent dr hab. Zenon Jasi ński Spis tre ści SPIS TRE ŚCI ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 WST ĘP................................................................................................................................................................... 6 ROZDZIAŁ I: DZIECI ŃSTWO I MŁODO ŚĆ 1885 – 1914........................................................................... 16 OKRES UKRAI ŃSKI 1885 – 1904 ........................................................................................................................ 16 STUDIA WY śSZE I PIERWSZA PRACA 1904 – 1914.............................................................................................. 25 ROZDZIAŁ II: W OKOPACH PIERWSZEJ WOJNY ŚWIATOWEJ 1914 – 1918................................... 34 W POLSKIEJ ORGANIZACJI WOJSKOWEJ I W LEGIONACH 1914 – 1916.............................................................. 34 W KONSPIRACJI W WARSZAWIE 1916 – 1918.................................................................................................... 43 ROZDZIAŁ III: PIERWSZE LATA NIEPODLEGŁEJ POLSKI 1918 – 1926 ........................................... 60 śOŁNIERZ WOJSKA POLSKIEGO 1918 – 1923 -
Organy Polskiej Administracji Państwowej W Królestwie Polskim 1916–1918 : Struktura I Gabinety
Jacek Goclon Organy polskiej administracji państwowej w Królestwie Polskim 1916–1918 : struktura i gabinety Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis 3/2, 41-92 2014 Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis 2014, vol. 3 (2), 41–92 Jacek Goclon Uniwersytet Wrocławski Organy polskiej administracji państwowej w Królestwie Polskim 1916–1918. Struktura i gabinety Polish Administrative Goverment in the Kingdom of Poland 1916–1918. Departments and structure Abstract: The rebirth of the Polish state during World War I was mainly connected with acquisition of fresh recruit soldiers for the armies of Germany and the Habsburg Empire. The goverments in Berlin and Vienna turned their attention to the Polish nation living in the former territories of tsarist Russia, lost to Germany and Austria in 1915 during the war. The only way to convince the Polish nation to cooper- ate was a clear promise of the rebirth of Polish goverment in these territories and of full independence of the new Polish state after the war. The first step, as a proxy solution, was the Temoporary Civil Council, next the State Council, created in 1916. Soon the members of the council (including Józef Piłsudski) have decided to stop their activity, because the German and Austian goverments failed to keep their promises. The next step was a joint announcement of two emperoros, German and Austrian, which on 5 November 1917 proclamed the Kingdom of Poland, with Regency Council as a goverment. During one year of its activity, the Regency Council created three cabinets with the following three Prime Ministers: Jan Kucharzewski, Jan Steczkowski and Józef Świeżyński. The scope of activity and real power of this cabinets were very limited, but they constituted a beginning of the process of crea- tion and rebirth of the Polish independent state and of education of the future administrative team for the first central independent Polish State. -
Vilniaus Rūmų Istorija History of Vilnius Palaces Geschichte Der Paläste
Vilniaus rūmų istorija History of Vilnius Palaces Lietuvos Didžiosios Kunigaikštystės laikus ir gar- Vėliau rūmų savininkai tapo kunigaikščiai Fitinhofai ir diplomatas K. P. Bžostauskas namus sujungė į projektą. Jame buvo laikomi ginklai, rūsiuose buvo The palaces of Vilnius date back to the historical 3. Tyzenhauzai (Tyzenhaus) Palace (Vokiečių St. lor of the GDL Aleksandras Mykolas Sapiega. In 1831, 12. Pacai (Pac) Palace (Didžioji St. 7) VILNIAUS TURIZMO INFORMACIJOS CENTRAS / sias Pacų, Radvilų, Sapiegų, Chodkevičių gimines juos rekonstravo architektas M. Knakfusas. Sidabrinė vientisą rūmų kompleksą, kurį dekoravo M. Knakfu- kalėjimas. Rotušės viduje išlikusios Didžioji ir kitos times of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (hereinafter 28/17) after the uprising was subdued, the Tsarist authorities In the second half of the 17th century, Hetman VILNIUS TOURIST INFORMATION CENTRE bei jų darbus mena senamiestyje išlikę rūmai. Čia rūmų salė buvo vienas iš XIX a. pradžios Vilniaus, sas. salės, gotikiniai bei vėlesnio laikotarpio rūsiai. Šiuo referred to as the GDL) and represent prominent In the second half of the 18th century the GDL confiscated the palace and established the Gover- Mykolas Kazimieras Pacas (Michał Kazimierz Pac) buvo įsikūręs Lietuvos didikų elitas. kaip universitetinio miesto ir saloninės kultūros, metu Rotušėje vyksta reprezentaciniai renginiai, families of those times—namely Pacai (Pac), Radvilos nobleman Antanas Tyzenhauzas (Antoni Tyzenhaus) nor’s Board therein. built an ornate palace that was visited by King J. So- centrų. 7. Prezidento rūmai (S. Daukanto a. 3) koncertai ir parodos. Nuo Rotušės portiko į vilniečius (Radziwiłł), Sapiegos (Sapieha), Chodkevičiai (Chod- restored the building that used to be in here. Later, bieski, Tsar Alexander I and Emperor Napoleon. -
KH2017 Ang1-III.Kmd
Kwartalnik Historyczny Vol. CXXIV, 2017 Eng.-Language Edition no. 1 PL ISSN 0023-5903 Hans-Jürgen Bömelburg, Edmund Kizik, Altes Reich und Alte Repub- lik. Deutsch-polnische Beziehungen und Verflechtungen 1500–1806, Darm- stadt, 2014, WBG Verlag, 214 pp., WBG Deutsch-Polnische Geschich- te, Bd. 2 This work by two historians from Poland and Germany looks at the bilateral relations between Poland and Germany in the early modern period. Aimed to fill a gap in the publishing market, it presents a comparative synthesis of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Republic) and the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation (Reich). Written in German, it is targeted mainly at the German reader. However, Polish readers will also find it very informative. The chronological boundaries of 1500–1806 are rather loose. Considering the history of Poland,the year 1500 is symbolic and stands for two other dates: 1493, when the first bicameral Sejm was summoned, and 1505 when the Nihil Novi constitution (law) was passed. For the German States, the boundary of the year 1500 is even less explicit, although the authors emphasize the historical significance of the beginnings of capitalist forms of production in the German territories. The end date, the year 1806, marks the collapse of the German Reich. The year 1795, the date of the Third Partition of Poland, would be probably more appropriate for the Commonwealth. The geographical area under consideration is marked by the German Reich, the territories settled by the German speaking population, such as Ducal Prussia and Livonia, and many cities in the Polish Crown largely populated by Germans, especially Danzig (Gdańsk), Thorn (Toruń) and Elbing (Elbląg) on one side,and the Commonwealth of the Two Nations, extended by the areas populated by speakers of Polish (that is, Ducal Prussia and parts of Silesia) on the other. -
WA303 83582 II11310 Wolsza.Pdf
ISBN 83-88909-29-0 9788388 909290 http://rcin.org.pl http://rcin.org.pl http://rcin.org.pl Redakcja i korekta Barbara Janicka Indeks zestawi³ Tadeusz Wolsza Opracowanie graficzne i projekt ok³adki Dariusz Górski © Copyright by Tadeusz Wolsza © Copyright by Instytut Historii PAN ISBN 83–88909–29–0 Wydawca Instytut Historii PAN Rynek Starego Miasta 29/31, 00–272 Warszawa tel. 831–02–61 w. 44 e-mail: [email protected] www.ihpan.edu.pl Wydanie I – Warszawa 2005 Objętość 19,5 arkuszy wydawniczych Nak³ad 500 egzamplarzy Druk i oprawa Sowa – Druk na życzenie www.sowadruk.pl, tel. 022 431–81–40 http://rcin.org.pl Wstêp W latach dziewięćdziesiątych XX w. i na początku XXI stulecia świa- t³o dzienne ujrza³o kilkanaście prac z zakresu myśli politycznej polskiej emigracji w Wielkiej Brytanii po zakoñczeniu II wojny światowej. Listê najwa¿niejszych publikacji otwieraj¹ pionierskie rozprawy Mariana S. Wo- lañskiego1. Wroc³awski badacz jest ponadto autorem kilkunastu niezwy- kle wa¿nych artykułów, dotycz¹cych głównie tematyki niemieckiej i za- gadnieñ wschodnioeuropejskich2. Wskazane prace, niekiedy wprawdzie dyskusyjne, lokują go wśród czołowych badaczy w kraju, zajmuj¹cych siê tematyk¹ emigracyjn¹. Z innych historyków badających zagadnienia emi- gracyjnej myśli politycznej oraz podejmuj¹cych problematykê polityki za- granicznej władz RP na obczyźnie w okresie powojennym wskaza³bym w tym miejscu na trzech historyków warszawskich: Andrzeja Friszke, Paw³a Machcewicza i Rafała Habielskiego, autorów głośnej, trzytomowej pracy Druga wielka emigracja 1945–19903 oraz kilku innych wa¿nych studiów 1 M.S. Wolañski, Środowiska emigracyjne w Londynie i Pary¿u a kwestia stosunków polsko-niemieckich (1949–1972), Wroc³aw 1992; idem, Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia w myśli politycznej emigracji polskiej 1945–1975, Wroc³aw 1996. -
The History of Slavery Covers Slave Systems in Historical Perspective In
The history of slavery covers slave systems in historical perspective in which one human being is legally the property of another, can be bought or sold, is not allowed to escape and must work for the owner without any choice involved. As Drescher (2009) argues, "The most crucial and frequently utilized aspect of the condition is a communally recognized right by some individuals to possess, buy, sell, discipline, transport, liberate, or otherwise dispose of the bodies and behavior of other individuals."[1] An integral element is that children of a slave mother automatically become slaves.[2] It does not include historical forced labor by prisoners, labor camps, or other forms of unfree labor in which laborers are not considered property. Slavery can be traced back to the earliest records, such as the Code of Hammurabi (c. 1760 BC), which refers to it as an established institution.[3] Slavery is rare among hunter-gatherer populations as slavery depends on a system of social stratification. Slavery typically also requires a shortage of labor and a surplus of land to be viable.[4] David P. Forsythe wrote: "The fact remained that at the beginning of the nineteenth century an estimated three-quarters of all people alive were trapped in bondage against their will either in some form of slavery or serfdom."[5] Slavery is no longer legal anywhere in the world.[6] Mauritania abolished it in law in 1981[7] and was the last country to do so – see Abolition of slavery timeline. However, the number of slaves today is higher than at any point in history,[8] -
Katyn Massacre – Basic Facts
The Person and the Challenges Volume 3 (2013) Number 2, p. 65–92 Monika Komaniecka, Krystyna Samsonowska, Mateusz Szpytma, Anna Zechenter Monika Komaniecka, Institute of National Remembrance, Cracow, Poland Krystyna Samsonowska, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland Mateusz Szpytma, Institute of National Remembrance, Cracow, Poland Anna Zechenter, Institute of National Remembrance, Cracow, Poland Katyn Massacre – Basic Facts Abstract Katyn is a symbol of the criminal policy of the Soviet system against the Polish nation. The present study aims to demonstrate the basic facts of Katyn massacre – the execution of almost 22,000 people: Polish prisoners of war in Katyn, Kharkov, Kalinin (Tver) and also other Polish prisoners (soldiers and civilians), which took place in the spring of 1940 in different places of the Soviet Ukraine and Belarus republics based on the decision of the Soviet authorities, that is the Political Bureau of All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of March 5, 1940. This article refers not only to the massacre itself, but also its origin, historical processes and the lies accompanying Katyn massacre. Keywords Katyn massacre, Soviet policy, All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks). The term ‘Katyn massacre’ refers to the execution in the spring of 1940 of almost 22,000 people: Polish prisoners of war in Katyn, Kharkov, Kalinin (Tver) and also prisoners (soldiers and civilians), in different places of the Soviet Ukraine and Belarus republics based on the decision of the Soviet authorities, that is the Political Bureau of All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of March 5, 1940. The commonly used expression referring to the simultaneous murders at many locations includes only the name of one of them, where the bodies of the officers were buried.