DOCSLIB.ORG

Interstates 805/ 5 South Corridor Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interstates 805/ 5 South Corridor Study INTERSTATES 805 / 5 SOUTH CORRIDOR STUDY June 2005 401 B Street, Suite 800 • San Diego, CA 92101-4231 • (619) 699-1900 BOARD OF DIRECTORS The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making. The Association builds consensus, makes strategic plans, obtains and allocates resources, and provides information on a broad range of topics pertinent to the region’s quality of life. CHAIR: Hon. Mickey Cafagna VICE CHAIR: Hon. Mary Sessom EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Gary L. Gallegos CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF SAN MARCOS Hon. Matt Hall, Mayor Pro Tem Hon. Corky Smith, Mayor (A) Hon. Bud Lewis, Mayor (A) Hon. Pia Harris-Ebert, Councilmember (A) Hon. Ann Kulchin, Councilmember CITY OF SANTEE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Hon. Hal Ryan, Vice Mayor Hon. Steve Padilla, Mayor (A) Hon. Randy Voepel, Mayor (A) Hon. Patty Davis, Deputy Mayor (A) Hon. Jack Dale, Councilmember (A) Hon. Jerry Rindone, Councilmember CITY OF SOLANA BEACH CITY OF CORONADO Hon Joe Kellejian, Councilmember Hon. Phil Monroe, Mayor Pro Tem (A) Hon. David Powell, Deputy Mayor (A) Hon. Frank Tierney, Councilmember (A) Hon. Lesa Heebner, Councilmember CITY OF DEL MAR CITY OF VISTA Hon. Crystal Crawford, Deputy Mayor Hon. Morris Vance, Mayor (A) Hon. David Druker, Councilmember (A) Hon. Judy Ritter, Councilmember (A) Hon. Henry Abarbanel, Councilmember (A) Hon. Bob Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem CITY OF EL CAJON COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Hon. Mark Lewis, Mayor Hon. Dianne Jacob, Chairwoman (A) Hon. Jillian Hanson-Cox, Councilmember (A) Hon. Greg Cox, Supervisor CITY OF ENCINITAS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Hon. Christy Guerin, Deputy Mayor (Advisory Member) (A) Hon. Jerome Stocks, Councilmember Will Kempton, Director (A) Pedro Orso-Delgado, District 11 Director CITY OF ESCONDIDO Hon. Lori Holt Pfeiler, Mayor METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM (A) Hon. Ed Gallo, Mayor Pro Tem (Advisory Member) (A) Hon. Ron Newman, Councilmember Leon Williams, Chairman (A) Hon. Jerry Rindone, Vice Chairman CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH (A) Hon. Bob Emery, Board Member Hon. Patricia McCoy, Mayor Pro Tem (A) Hon. Diane Rose, Mayor NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT (A) Hon. Mayda Winter, Councilmember DEVELOPMENT BOARD (Advisory Member) CITY OF LA MESA Hon. Judy Ritter, Chair Hon. Barry Jantz, Vice Mayor (A) Vacant (A) Hon. David Allan, Councilmember (A) Hon. Ed Gallo, Board Member (A) Hon. Ernie Ewin, Councilmember IMPERIAL COUNTY CITY OF LEMON GROVE (Advisory Member) Hon. Mary Sessom, Mayor Hon. Victor Carrillo, Supervisor (A) Hon. Jill Greer, Councilmember (A) Hon. David Ouzan, Mayor (A) Hon. Jerry Jones, Mayor Pro Tem U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY (Advisory Member) Hon. Ron Morrison, Vice Mayor CAPT Daniel King, USN, CEC (A) Hon. Frank Parra, Councilmember Commander, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command CITY OF OCEANSIDE (A) CAPT Richard Gamble, USN, CEC Hon. Jack Feller, Councilmember (A) Vacant SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT (Advisory Member) Jess Van Deventer, Commissioner CITY OF POWAY (A) Michael Bixler, Commissioner Hon. Mickey Cafagna, Mayor (A) Vacant (A) Hon. Don Higginson, Councilmember (A) Hon. Robert Emery, Deputy Mayor SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY (Advisory Member) CITY OF SAN DIEGO Hon. Bud Lewis, Director Hon. Jim Madaffer, Councilmember (A) Bernie Rhinerson, Director Hon. Scott Peters, Councilmember (A) Hon. Dick Murphy, Mayor BAJA CALIFORNIA/MEXICO (Advisory Member) Hon. Luis Cabrera Cuaron Consul General of Mexico As of December 29, 2004 ABSTRACT TITLE: Interstates 805/5 South Corridor Study AUTHOR: San Diego Association of Governments DATE: June 2005 SOURCE OF San Diego Association of Governments COPIES: 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 699-1900 NUMBER OF 79 PAGES: ABSTRACT: This study developed a transportation improvement strategy to enhance the mobility of inter-regional and regional trips for the entire Interstate 805 (I-805) corridor and the Interstate 5 (I-5) corridor south of State Route (SR) 54. This report presents the study’s Need and Purpose, the development and evaluation of multimodal transportation alternatives, and the study recommendations. It also serves as Caltrans’ project initiation document to advance the environmental clearance process. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Intestates 805/5 South Corridor Study was prepared with the guidance and assistance of the Transportation Committee and a Technical Working Group. Members of the Transportation Committee Chair: Joe Kellejian Alternates: Mayor, City of Solana Beach Christy Guerin (representing North County Coastal) Councilmember, City of Encinitas (representing North County Coastal) Vice Chair: Dick Murphy Mayor, City of San Diego Jim Madaffer Councilmember, City of San Diego Phil Monroe Mayor Pro Tem, City of Coronado Jerry Rindone (representing South County) Councilmember, City of Chula Vista (representing South County) Mickey Cafagna Mayor, City of Poway Corky Smith (representing North County Inland) Mayor, City of San Marcos (representing North County Inland) Jack Dale Councilmember, City of Santee Hal Ryan (representing East County) Councilmember, City of Santee (representing East County) Ron Roberts Supervisor, County of San Diego Dianne Jacob / Bill Horn Supervisor, County of San Diego Bob Emery Metropolitan Transit System Leon Williams Chair, Metropolitan Transit System Judy Ritter Chair, North County Transit District Jack Feller/Dave Druker North County Transit District Terry Johnson San Diego County Regional Airport Mary Sessom Authority San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Advisory: Pedro Orso-Delgado/Bill Figge Caltrans iv Agencies and Organizations of the Technical Working Group Air Pollution Control District Automobile Club of Southern California California Department of Fish and Game California Highway Patrol California Transportation Ventures, Inc. California Trucking Association Caltrans District 11 City of Chula Vista City of Imperial Beach City of National City City of San Diego County of San Diego Community Planning Groups within the study area sponsored by the City or County of San Diego Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration IMPlan (City of Tijuana’s Municipal Planning Institute) Otay Mesa Chamber of Commerce Port of San Diego San Diego Economic Development Corporation San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce Sierra Club, San Diego Chapter South County Economic Development Council Southwestern College U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Miramar The following staff from Caltrans and the San Diego Association of Governments contributed to the preparation of this study: Allan Kosup, Deputy District Director, Caltrans Program/Project Management Charles “Muggs” Stoll, Deputy District Director, Caltrans Environmental Division Bill Figge, Deputy District Director, Caltrans Planning Division John Rieger, Caltrans Project Manager, Caltrans Program/Project Management Armando Garcia, Branch Chief, Caltrans Advanced Planning Branch Roy Flores, Transportation Engineer, Caltrans Advanced Planning Branch Rick Curry, Research Analyst II, Caltrans GIS/Travel Forecasting Branch Matt Fowler, Environmental Planner, Caltrans Environmental Analysis Branch Ali Shahmiri, Associate Transportation Planner, Caltrans Community Planning Ellison Alegre, Associate Transportation Planner, Caltrans Systems/Regional Planning Branch Olga Estrada, Public Information Officer, Caltrans Public/Legislative Information Branch Gary L. Gallegos, Executive Director Eric Pahlke, Chief Deputy Executive Director Bob Leiter, Department Director of Land Use and Transportation Planning Jack Boda, Department Director Mobility Management and Project Implementation Toni Bates, Division Director, Transit Planning Mike Hix, Principal Transportation Planner Elisa Arias, SANDAG Project Manager Jose Nuncio, Senior Transportation Engineer Heather Werdick, Senior Transportation Planer Jennifer Williamson, Senior Transportation Planer v TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ....................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 2 Regional Transit Services and Highway Improvements for the I-805/I-5 South Corridors ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Long-Term Improvement Strategy...................................................................................... 2 Summary of Findings........................................................................................................................... 6 Background and Existing Conditions.......................................................................................... 6 Transportation Alternatives Evaluated ...................................................................................... 6 Development of Alternative 9 .................................................................................................... 6 Interim Improvement Strategy............................................................................................ 7 Evaluation Summary ............................................................................................................ 8 NEED AND PURPOSE.........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation
    Transportation - 373 - City of San Diego Fiscal Year 2021 Adopted Budget Page Intentionally Left Blank Transportation The Transportation Department's Capital Improvements Program provides for the installation and improvement of various transportation infrastructure and systems. The Department plans and programs right-of-way capital improvement projects including resurfacing of asphalt streets, reconstruction of concrete streets and sidewalks, rehabilitation of bridges, construction of pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular improvements, and upgrading obsolete streetlight circuits. 2020 CIP Accomplishments In Fiscal Year 2020, the Transportation & Storm Water Department, in coordination with the Public Works Department, completed capital projects including the construction of many pedestrian, bikeway, roadway, and traffic improvement projects. Many of these projects help to reach Climate Action Plan goals. During Fiscal Year 2020, the City paved 53.1 miles and slurry sealed 123.9 miles of streets and replaced 1.8 mile of concrete streets. Transportation projects that completed construction in Fiscal Year 2020 include: • AC Overlay Group 1502 • AC Overlay Group 1511, JOC7 • AC Overlay Street Paving Group 1601 • Academy St & Catalina Blvd Sidewalks • ADA S/W La Jolla Shore & Calle Corta • Ash Street & Richmond Street Sidewalk • Asphalt Resurfacing Group 1502 Option • Asphalt Resurfacing Group 1704 • Balboa Avenue Corridor • City Street Lights - 25 Locations • Citywide Street Lights GF Group 15 • Coast Blvd Sea Cave Emergency Stabilization Project
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobs Center Directions
    JACOBS CENTER DIRECTIONS EHC’s 2016 Annual Awards Celebration Email: [email protected] 404 Euclid Avenue Phone: (619) 527-6161 San Diego, CA 92114 DIRECTIONS B Y C A R From Downtown Take G Street east to the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. From Mission Valley or Interstate 8 Go south on Interstate 805, exit east at the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. From North County Go south on Interstate 805, exit east at the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. From East County Go west on the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. From South Bay Go North on Interstate 805, exit east at the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. B Y B U S Market Creek is steps away from the convenient Euclid Transit Station, near the corner of Euclid Avenue and Market Street.Several bus lines service the Euclid Transit Station from all areas of San Diego.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Valley Groundwater Aquifer
    General Information Mission Valley Groundwater Aquifer Overview • General Information Home • History • Contact Information • Geology • Water Emergencies • Pueblo Water Rights • Your Plumbing System • Grand Jury Report 2013 • Customer Outreach • Water Supply Contamination & Clean-up Status • Press Releases • History o Contamination Chronology • Clean-up Status o Spill Prevention, Control, And Countermeasure Plan (SPCC) and Barrier Containment • Regional Water Quality Control Board Oversight o Documents Water Supply Development • Conceptual Project • Field Investigations • Model Development OVERVIEW The Mission Valley Aquifer (MVA) follows the course of the San Diego River from Mission Gorge on the east to the Pacific Ocean on the west and is bound by its valley walls and covers about 6.2 square miles. The MVA is typical of riverine aquifers of southern California consisting of deposits of primarily gravel and sand conducive for high- yielding groundwater wells. Mission Valley, its aquifer and river system, provided water to help establish and sustain the San Diego Mission dating back to 1769. A well field in the MVA, that spanned a distance from where Qualcomm Stadium is located to the Interstate 805 & Interstate 8 interchange, served as one of the City of San Diego’s (City’s) primary sources of drinking water from about 1914 until 1936. The City owns a special water right called a Pueblo right, which is a prior and paramount right to all of the water of the San Diego River (surface and underground). Eventually it was understood that local water supplies would not meet the ultimate demand for water, thus the City began importing water in the late 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • California Highways and Public Works
    Install traffic signals, highway light­ San Joaquin Road. Estimated cost, Rights-of-way on various state high­ ing and channelization at the intersec­ $67,000; State's share, $56,000; balance way routes-$9,468,000, including ap­ tion of MacArthur Boulevard (new to be shared by the county and New­ proximately $4,000,000 on Interstate State Route 7 3) and Palisades Road- port Beach. 405 (San Diego Freeway). SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES PROJECTS Imperial County limit of Camp Mathews and 0.5 mile and near Escondido, a distance of 2. 3 Construct four-lane U.S. 99-State south of Carmel Valley Road in San miles. Estimated cost, $500,000. Sign Route 111 Expressway between Diego with interchanges at Genesee Widen the Clairemont Mesa Boule­ State Sign Route 98 in Calexico and Avenue, Sorrento Valley Road, and vard Overcrossing from two lanes to County Road 16, 0.5 mile south of the the future Interstate 805 Freeway in four and revise the interchange con­ future Interstate 8 Freeway; and Sorrento Valley, a distance of 3.4 nections to U.S. 395 in San Diego. Es­ widen and resurface State Sign Route miles. Estimated cost, $6,230,000. timated cost, $390,000; State's share, 111 between County Road 16 and U.S. Construct eight-lane section for fu­ $340,000; city, $50,000. 80 east of El Centro. Estimated cost, ture San Diego Freeway (Interstate Construct four-lane State Sign $2,350,000. 5) between 0.1 mile south of San Route 67 Freeway between 1.5 miles Widen and resurface State Sign Marcos Road near Encinitas and 4.4 and 3.2 miles north of Interstate 8 Route 98 between 0.1 mile west of miles south of State Sign Route 78 near Santee.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-92-56 U.S.-Mexico Trade: Survey of U.S. Border Infrastructure Needs
    United States General Accounting Office Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-244050 November 27, 199 1 The Honorable Lloyd Bentsen Chairman, Committee on Finance United States Senate Dear Mr. Chairman: As you requested, we have reviewed current and projected U.S. border infrastructure needs associated with increased U.S.-Mexican trade. This report provides information on such needs as inspector staffing, inspection facilities, highways and bridges, and coordination in border management and planning efforts. Our interim study was entitled U.S.-Mexico Trade: Concerns About the Adequacy of Border Infrastructure (GAO/h’sIm-91-228, May 16, 1991). As agreed with your office, unless you publicly announce its contents earlier, we plan no further distribution of this report until 30 days from its issue date. At that time, we wilI send copies to the Customs Service; the Immigration and Naturalization Service; the General Services Administration; the International Boundary and Water Commission; the Department of State; the highway departments of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California; and other congressional committees. Copies will also be made available to others on request. Please contact me at (202) 275-4812 if you or your staff have any questions concerning this report. The major contributors to this report are listed in appendix I. Sincerely yours, Allan I. Mendelowitz, Director International Trade, Energy, and Finance Issues Trade and commercial traffic between the United States and Mexico Purpose have grown significantly in recent years. The capacity of existing border infrastructure to accommodate traffic is being strained, and anticipated expansion of trade is expected to intensify traffic pressures at the border.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 1. Regional Location Map
    Figure 1. Regional Location Map - 2 - INTRODUCTION SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF THE PLAN The updated San Ysidro Community Plan (Plan) is a comprehensive revision of the original plan adopted in 1974 and includes the urbanized portion of the Tijuana River Valley. The update was authorized at the City Council budget hearings of July 1987 and work on the project began in December of that year. The Planning Department, with the assistance of the San Ysidro Planning and Development Group, has studied San Ysidro’s major issues and challenges and has developed alternative solutions to realize the community’s potential. Included in the Plan is a set of recommendations based upon those alternative solutions to guide the development and the redevelopment of the San Ysidro community. Formal adoption of the revised Plan requires that the Planning Commission and City Council follow the same procedure of holding public hearings as was followed in adopting the original community plan. Adoption of the Plan also requires an amendment of the Progress Guide and General Plan (General Plan) for the City, which will occur at the first regularly scheduled General Plan amendment hearing following adoption of this Plan. Once the Plan is adopted, any amendments, additions or deletions will require that the Planning Commission and City Council follow City Council Policy 600-35 regarding the procedure for Plan amendments. Although this Plan sets forth procedures for implementation, it does not establish new regulations or legislation, nor does it rezone property. The rezoning and design controls recommended in the Plan will be enacted concurrently with Plan adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Cialis Daily Pill
    MOBILITY 21’s “IMBY” LIST** Twenty-one Critical Transportation Projects “In My Backyard” to Improve Mobility throughout Southern California** One Region. One Voice. One Future. Mobility 21, the leading Southern California transportation coalition, works to find solutions to the region’s pressing transportation issues. The transportation infrastructure investment need in Southern California exceeds $625 billion to improve mobility, reduce congestion and improve air quality for the 21 million residents. Congress is developing the next 6-year transportation funding bill that could help address improving the livability and mobility of Southern California residents. State and local government continues to face challenges in funding the region’s many infrastructure and transportation needs. Partnering with the federal government as it develops legislation for implementing Southern California’s $625 billion infrastructure improvement plan will be a high priority in the upcoming months. Mobility 21 has identified example transportation projects below that are included in the $625 billion plan that would improve mobility, congestion and air quality throughout Southern California. Mobility 21 will work with its partners to find funding solutions for these and other “must-do” projects in the region. Rail Safety Positive Train Control (PTC) Positive Train Control (PTC) is a predictive collision avoidance technology designed to stop a train before an accident occurs. PTC will help save lives by preventing train-to-train collisions, speeding and over-speed derailments, incursions into work zones along the tracks and movement of a train through a switch left in the wrong position. Reducing Congestion Interstate-10 Freeway Corridor One of the most heavily-used trade routes in the nation, the I-10 corridor is also one of the most congested.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bridges of San Diego County: the Art of Civil Engineering
    The Bridges of San Diego County: The Art of Civil Engineering Christine Robbins Every bridge represents a problem solved, a challenge overcome, a connection made. San Diego, with its abundance of hills, mesas, and canyons, showcases the art of bridge building. Civil engineers took on the task and were lauded for their work in this poem: They have built magnificent bridges where the nation’s highways go; O’er perilous mountain ridges and where great rivers flow. Wherever a link was needed between the new and the known They have left their marks of Progress, in iron and steel and stone. There was never a land too distant nor ever a way too wide, But some man’s mind, insistent, reached out to the other side. They cleared the way, these heroes, for the march of future years. The march of Civilization—and they were its Pioneers. —Portion of “The Bridge Builders,” a poem by Evelyn Simms The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) considers bridges an important aspect of civil engineering. According to the organization’s policy statement; “Bridges are a visible icon of the Civil Engineer’s art. Historic bridges are important links to our past, serve as safe and vital transportation routes in the Author Christine Robbins acknowledges contributions by Civil Engineers Tim Shell, PE, of the City of Vista and Wade Durant, PE, Pete Smith, PE, ENV SP, and Clark Fernon, PE, of T.Y. Lin International. The author wishes to acknowledge all those who generously shared their recollections of working on some of the bridges discussed in the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Study Area
    Orange Co. Riverside Co. San Diego Co. INTERSTATE Camp 76 CALIFORNIA 805 Pendleton INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA 5 Oceanside San 78 Beyer Blvd Marcos Escondido Carlsbad 78 Encinitas Pacific Ocean INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA Poway Solana Beach 15 Del Mar 54 La Jolla INTERSTATE Santee CALIFORNIA 805 El Cajon INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA 8 54 94 Coronado INTERSTATE National City CALIFORNIA 5 INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA Chula Vista 805 905 United States Imperial Beach Mexico Olive Dr Olive Project Site 4 3 East Beyer Blvd 5 East San Ysidro Blvd 2 INTERSTATE Via de San Ysidro CALIFORNIA 5 Border Village Rd West Calle P 1 rimera Willow Rd Willow 6 za Rail Ct Pla ve. e la o d A in Virginia m Ca 7 9 8 s W Camione ay Existing POE USA LEGEND MEXICO 1 Study Intersection Locations Figure 1-1 Project Study Area N Not To Scale Source: KOA Corporation, April 2009 I:\ArcGIS\G\GSA-01 SanYsidroLandPOE\Map\ENV\EIS\Fig3-4-1_Traffic Study Area.indd -NM Traffi c Study Area SAN YSIDRO LAND PORT OF ENTRY IMPROVEMENTS Figure 3.4-1 INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA 805 Beyer Blvd e Dr e Oliv 29,925 23,950 27 ,600 East Bey 34 ,925 er B East San Y lvd 22,600 sidro Blvd INTERSTATE Via de San Ysidro CALIFORNIA5 Border Village Rd 25,525 West Calle P rimera 3,475 3,475 Rd 17 Willow ,475 R za e. ail Ct Pla v e la o d A in Virginia m Ca 24,275 21,375 6,625 s W Camione ay USA Proposed LPOE MEXICO LEGEND 1,500 Average Daily Traffic Figure 4-4 Near-Term (2014) Roadway Segment Volumes with Project N Not To Scale Source: KOA Corporation, April 2009 I:\ArcGIS\G\GSA-01 SanYsidroLandPOE\Map\ENV\EIS\Fig3-4-2_Near Term
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT CHAPTER 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope 1 1.2 Implementing the Vision and Themes 2 1.3 Relation to Other General Plan Elements and Policies 3 1.4 Relation to Other City Plans and Policies 3 Figure 5-1: General Plan Implementation Tools 4 1.4.1 Chula Vista Municipal Code 5 1.4.2 Redevelopment Plans 5 1.4.3 Specific Plans 6 1.4.4 General Development Plans 6 Figure 5-2: Redevelopment Project Areas 7 1.4.5 Sectional Planning Area Plans 8 1.4.6 Precise Plans 8 1.4.7 Local Coastal Program 8 1.5 Relationship to Regional and Multi-Jurisdictional Plans 9 1.5.1 San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 9 Figure 5-3: Specific Plan Locations 10 1.5.2 Otay Valley Regional Park Concept Plan 12 1.5.3 Port of San Diego’s Marine Activities 12 1.5.4 Regional Airport Authority 12 2.0 EXISTING LAND USE 13 Table 5-1: City of Chula Vista Existing Developed Land Use (2004) 13 3.0 COMMUNITY IMAGE AND CHARACTER 14 3.1 Scenic Resources and Open Space Network 15 Figure 5-4: Designated Scenic Roadways 16 Figure 5-5: Open Space Network 17 Figure 5-6: Entryways and Gateways 19 3.2 Gateways 20 Table 5-2: Primary Gateway Locations 22 3.3 Neighborhood Identity 24 3.4 Historic Preservation 24 3.5 Urban Design and Form 25 4.0 LAND USE PLAN 27 4.1 Regional Context 27 City of Chula Vista General Plan Page LUT-i Chula Vista LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Vision CHAPTER 5 2020 4.2 Area Plans and Planning Hierarchy 27 4.2.1 Area Plans 27 4.2.2 Planning Hierarchy 27 Figure 5-7: Planning Areas 28 Figure
    [Show full text]
  • Draft NHMRR Federal Register Notice
    State: California State Agency: CA Highway Patrol FMCSA: CA FMCSA Field Office POC: Tian-Ting Shih FMCSA POC: CA Motor Carrier Division Administrator Address: Commercial Vehicle Section Address: 1325 J Street, Suite 1540 P.O. Box 942898 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 94298-0001 Phone: (916) 843-3400 Phone: (916) 930-2760 Fax: (916) 322-3154 Fax: (916) 930-2778 Web Address: www.chp.ca.gov California – Restricted HM routes Desig- Route Restriction(s) nation Route Description City County Order (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,i) Date 10/28/92 A No person shall drive or permit the driving of 1 any vehicle transporting commodities listed in Section 13 CCR 1150 upon any highway not designated by this article. For pickup and delivery not over designated routes, the route selected must be the shortest-distance route from the pickup location to the nearest designated route entry location, and the shortest-distance route to the delivery location from the nearest designated route exit location. 01/01/95 B State 75 [Coronado Toll Bridge] from Mile Post San Diego San Diego 1,2,3,4 20.28 to Mile Post R22.26 Junction 5 [San Diego County] No flammables/corrosives or explosives on Coronado Bay Bridge (otherwise route is terminal access) 06/29/00 C Sepulveda Blvd. [tunnel] from Interstate Los Angeles Los Angeles 1,2,3,4,5,6,8 105/Imperial Highway to W. Century Blvd. [Restriction for Tank Vehicles] 10/28/92 D State 118 from State 232 [Oxnard] to Los 1 Angeles [western county line] 01/01/95 E State 154 from State 246 [MP 8.11- Santa Ynez] Santa Barbara 0 to US 101 [near Los Olivos] No hazardous materials or waste except pickup and delivery (otherwise, from R8.11 to R9.97 is Terminal Access and from R9.97 to 32.29 is California Legal) 1968 F Monterey Traffic Underpass from Washington Monterey Monterey 0 St.
    [Show full text]