DOCSLIB.ORG

California Highways and Public Works, November-December 1964

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Highways and Public Works, November-December 1964 ~..... .. STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY ROBERT B. BRADFORD Administrator DEPAitTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JOHN ERRECA, Director FRANK A. CHAMBERS . Chief Deputy Director RUSSELL J. GOONEY . Deputy Director (Management) T. F. BAGSHAW Assistant Director JUSTIN DuCRAY Departmental Management Analyst HARRY D. FREEMAN Deputy Director (Planning) C. RAY VARLEY Assistant Director S. ALAN WHITE Departmental Personnel Officer DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1. C. WOMACK State Highway Engineer, Chief of Division CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY COMMISSION J. P. MURPHY Depuly State Highway Engineer Right of way J. A. LE6ARRA Deputy State Highway Engineer RUDOLF HESS Chief Right of Way Agent ROBERT B. BRADFORD Chairman and L. KAGAN Assistant Chief GEO. LANGSNER Deputy State Highway Engineer HARRY Administrator, Highway DEXTER D. MacBRiDE Assistant Chief Agency LYMAN R. GILLIS Assistant State Highway Engineer Transportation R. S. 1. PIANEZZI Assistant Chief J. E. McMAHON Assistant State Highway Engineer ABRAHAM KOFMAN Vice Chairman FRANK E. BAXTER Assistant 5tafe Highway Engineer DistricT 1, Eureka Alameda SAM HELWER District Engineer GEORGE A. HILL Assistant State Highway Engineer JAMES A. GUTHRIE San Bernardino 1. C. BURRILL fompfroller District 2, Redding ROGER S. WOOLLEY San Diego H. S. MILES District Engineer NEAL E. ANDERSEN . Equipment Engineer FRANKLIN S. PAYNE Los Angeles JOHN L. BEATON Materials and Research Engineer nisrricr 3, Marysville WILLIAM S. WHITEHURST . Fresno WARREN District Engineer C. G. BEER Urban Planner W• ~• JOSEPH C. HOUGHTELING Sunnyvale Engineer A. N. DUNNAM Computer Systems District 4, San Francisco Engineer of Design ALVORD C. ESTEP ALAN $. HART District Engineer JOHN ERRECA Administrative Officer Engineer J. F. JORGENSEN Construction R. A. HAYLER Deputy District Engineer and Director of Public Works Information SCOTT H. LATHROP Personnel and Public HAIG AYANIAN Qeputy District Engineer JACK COOPER, Secretary Sacramento C. T. LEDDEN City and County Projects Engineer C. F. GREENE Deputy District Engineer H. C. McCARTY Office Engineer JACK E. PEDDY Project Control Engineer Disfricf 5, son Buis Obispo District 8, San Bernardino DAWA G. PEN6ILLY Planning Engineer R. J. DATEL District Engineer C. V. KANE District Engineer E. J. L. PETERSON Program and Budget Engineer R. V. POTTER Systems Research Engineer nis~ricr 6, Fresno District 9, Bishop WELCH District Engineer E. L. TINNEY . Maintenance Engineer W ~• C. A. SHERVINGTON District Engineer DONALD P. VAN RIPER Principal Landscape Architect District ~, cos Angeles J. E. WILSON Traffic Engineer E. T. TELFORD District Engineer District 10, SfockTOn A. L. ELLIOTT Bridge Engineer—Planning A. L. HIMELHOCH Deputy District Engineer JOHN G. MEYER District Engineer R. J. IVY Bridge Engineer—Administration A. C. BIRNIE Deputy District Engineer I. 0. JAHLSTROM . Bridge Engineer—Operetions A. W. HOY Deputy District Engineer District 11, San Qiego DALE DOWNING Bridge Engineer—Southern Area R. E. DEFFEBACH Deputy District Engineer JACOB DEKEMA District Engineer DIVISION OF CONTRACTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY HARRY S. FENTON Chief Counsel EMERSON RHYNER Deputy Chief (Sacramento) HOLLOWAY JONES Deputy Chief (San Francisco) REGINALD B. PEGRAM Deputy Chief (Los Angeles) DOVISION OF BAY TOLL CROSSINGS E. R. FOLEY . Chief Engineer BEN BALALA Planning and Construction CHARLES L. SWEET Operations DIVISION OF AEROfVAl171CS CLYDE P. BARNETT Director, Chief of Division p33765-500 it-6~ 66N[ rY%tt~CQ I)1 CALIFORNIA OrfICE Of STATE PRINTING California Hi~ hwa Y sand Public Works Official Journal of the Division of Highways, Department of Public Works, State of California Vol. 4~ November-December Nos. 1 1-12 CONTENTS Poge Departmental Organization Chart _ ___ _ __ 2 California Highway Commission _ __ __ _ __ _ 3 California Highways-1964 __ _ _ _ _ 5 Division Organization Chart _ __ ____ __ ___ __ _ 21 Operations . -------- - _ -- ----- _ - ---_ ---- -- 22 Construction --------- ----- ----- -------- ---- - - -- -- ----- _ __ 22 Maintenance--------------------------------- --- -- ------------------ - _ - - 24 Materials and Research ------------------------- --- -- ---- ----- ------ 27 Equipment- --- -- ------------------ --- --------- -- - ---- - _ 30 Administration ----- ----------------- - --------------- ---- - _ 33 Office Engineer ________. _ --------------- -- - -------------- - -_ City and County Projects ----- _ -----_----- ----- --- ------ -- __---------------- 36 Service and Supply ___..-------___ --_ ----_ ---- 39 Management Analysis --------------- __ ------- -- ---------- ---- -------- 40 Systems Research ------------------------ --------------- 40 Planning --------- ------------------ -- -------- - -- - -- ----------_ 41 Advance Planning ---- ------------------- - - ------------------ ------------------------ 41 FRONT COVER: In fhis aerial photo taken above Photogrammetric Mapping and Aerial Photography ___________ _________ 42 Donner down the eastern slope Programs and Budgets -------------_----------_-------- -- -_----- Pass, old US 40 winds -------------------------- 43 toward Donner Lake in fhe distance. The new Inter Design ---------------- ------------------ - --------------------------------- ------- 44 state 80 Freeway, opened fo froffic on November 20, Traffic- ----------------------- ----- -------------- -- ----- r---------------- -------------------- 46 can be seen on the slopes to the left of the lake and beyond. (Photo by William R. Chaney). Urban Planning ------------ -- -----------------------------=- --------- 49 Bridges --------------------------------------------------------------- --- ----------------- 51 BACK COVER: This nighttime view of the Antelope B ri dg e P I a n ni ng ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ --- 51 Road interchange on Interstate 80 near Sacramento displays the Division of Highways' latest devices aimed BridgeOperations ------------------------------------------------- — ------- 52 SpecialStudies 56 at keeping wrong-way drivers ofi freeways. the whi~e- ----------------------------------------------- ------- - on-red signs which read WRONG WAY will be Bridge Office Engineering ------------------------------------------------- --------- 57 similarly placed on all ofi` ramps in the Stafe Highway Special Projects ________ 57 system. The red pavement arrow (which is invisible to a driver clearing the ramp) and the sign, GO BACK— Personnel and Information ______________________________ .__.______________ ______ 5$ You Are Going—WRONG WAY, are still in the experi- Personnel------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 58 menta( stage and are now installed at a limited num- ber of locations. (Photo by Bill Ruland.) Training _____________ -------------------------------------------------- ________ 59 EmployeeSafeYY ------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- 60 Audio-visual ------------ -------------------------------------- -------- 61 Public Information -- ------------------------------------------- --- -- 61 Rightof WaY - - ------------------------------------------------------- ------- ---------- 63 Legal - - - -- ---------------------------------- ----------- ------ ------------ 66 Fiscal Management ---------- --- ------------------------------------------ ------ 68 1965-66 Highway Budget ------------ --- ------------------------------------____--_- 71 LESTER S. KORITZ, Editor STEWART MITCHELL, Associate Editor MARCIA J. MICKELSEN, Assistant Editor WILLIAM R. CHANEY, Chief Photographer ~difors are invited to use information contained herein and }o request prints of any black and white photographs. Address communications to: EDITOR, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC WORKS P.O. Box 1499 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95807 State of California Department of Public Works — Organization Chart GOVERNOR ` Edmnnd G. Blown I ADMINISFRaTOR QF HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION~1~ Robert E Bradford CALIFORNIR HIGHWAY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CALfFORNIA TOLL STATE AERONAUTICS BOARD COMMISSION — Ez~ — BRIDGE AUTHORITY 7 Members John Erreca 5 Members 5 Members SECRETARY C.H.C. CHIEF DEPUTY DfRECTOR A. J. Cooper Frank A. Chambers DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR (Planning) (Management) Harry D. Freeman Russell J Cooney DIRECTOR`S OFFICE STAFF QtVISfON OF CONTRACTS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DIVISION OF BAY TOLL DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS AND RIGHTS OF WAY ~Legac CROSSINGS Division Chief State Highway Engineer Division Chief Director Harry S. Fenton J. C. Womack E. R.. Foley Clyde P Barnett (1) Administrator is Ex-officio Chairman and Member of the California Highway Commission and a Member o[ the California Toll Bridge Authority (2) Director is Ex-officio Administrative Officer of the California Highway Commission and Administrative Officer of the California Toll Bridge Authority NOVEMF3ER, 1964 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY COMMISSION ROBERT B. BRADFORD, Chairman, Ex Ofricio Dttte of original Member Residence appoi~atncent Terytz expires Jn~tES A. GUTHRIF,~ San Bernardino ___________ _______________________________ ______________________September 14, 1943 January 1 S, 1965 ROGF,R S. WOOI;LEY~ Rancho Santa Fe _____ _______________________________ __________________________March 1 S, 1959 January 15, 1467 Asxnxn~-i KOFi~iAN~ Alameda -------------------------------------------------------------------September 14, 1961 January 15, 1964 FRANKLIN S. PAYNE~ Los Angeles _____________________ _______________________________ ._______.February
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Burbank/Del Monte SNI Planning Area Boundary February 7, 2002 %
    Burbank/DelBurbank/Del MonteMonte SNISNI PlanningPlanning AreaArea AVE TAMARACK UNIVERSITY WAY FREMONT BEL-AIR LIBRARYLIBRARY AVE THETHETHE ALAMEDA ALAMEDAALAMEDA DELMAS SEQUOIA (STATE ROUTE 82) THETHETHE ALAMEDA ALAMEDAALAMEDA AVE ALAMEDA THE BUSH CLEAVES WILSON SINGLETARY SUNOL ATLAS S KEEBLE AVE S MORRISON STOVER HOOVERHOOVER WHITEWHITEWHITE WHITEWHITEWHITE HOOVERHOOVER RACE HOOVERHOOVER WHITEWHITEWHITE HADLEY TRACETRACE TRACETRACE TILLMAN AVE ST DR MCENERYMCENERY LAURELEI AVE MIDDLEMIDDLE SCHOOLSCHOOL HEDDING MIDDLEMIDDLE SCHOOLSCHOOL MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARYELEMENTARY CRANDALL ST DR PARKPARK CAHILL ST ST SCHOOLSCHOOL UNIVER AVE AVE SITY AVE HESTER AVE AVE DR BELLEROSE DR SHASTA STSTST MCALISTER AVE AVE GARLAND STSTST EMORY STSTST GENEVIEVE LN AVE ST AVE WW W SAN SAN SAN FERNANDO FERNANDO FERNANDO AVE WW W SAN SAN SAN FERNANDO FERNANDO FERNANDO AVE AVE ST (STATE ROUTE 87) TRACE AVE ST. LEO THE GREAT HANCHETT (PRIVATE) ST WOZ ST GARDEN DR SONOMA BELLEROSE MCDANIEL GIFFORD LAKEHOUSE S MORRISON S CALAVERAS W SAN FERNANDO ST AVE CLEAVES MARTIN ST NAGLEE AVE AVE OTTERSONST ST DANIEL AVE O'CONNOR DR LINCOLNLINCOLN LINCOLNLINCOLN LUTHER AVE ST SIERRA RANIER ST SENIORSENIOR HIGHHIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL AVE SENIORSENIOR HIGHHIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL AVE FORESTFOREST BROOKLYN AVE WABASH AVE FLORENCE CIRO SALVO DI O'CONNOR RAMOS AVEAVE ST AVE EUGENE AVE WAY FORESTFOREST FORESTFOREST AVE WAY ST AVE POSA AVE JOSEFA CLARMAR AVE AVE AVE BOSTON AVE HESTER AVE AVE MONROE ST MONROE MARI REVEY ST. MARTIN OF TOURS AVE BIRD BIRD BIRD SHASTA AVEAVEBIRD BIRD BIRD YOSEMITENORTON
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    Transportation - 373 - City of San Diego Fiscal Year 2021 Adopted Budget Page Intentionally Left Blank Transportation The Transportation Department's Capital Improvements Program provides for the installation and improvement of various transportation infrastructure and systems. The Department plans and programs right-of-way capital improvement projects including resurfacing of asphalt streets, reconstruction of concrete streets and sidewalks, rehabilitation of bridges, construction of pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular improvements, and upgrading obsolete streetlight circuits. 2020 CIP Accomplishments In Fiscal Year 2020, the Transportation & Storm Water Department, in coordination with the Public Works Department, completed capital projects including the construction of many pedestrian, bikeway, roadway, and traffic improvement projects. Many of these projects help to reach Climate Action Plan goals. During Fiscal Year 2020, the City paved 53.1 miles and slurry sealed 123.9 miles of streets and replaced 1.8 mile of concrete streets. Transportation projects that completed construction in Fiscal Year 2020 include: • AC Overlay Group 1502 • AC Overlay Group 1511, JOC7 • AC Overlay Street Paving Group 1601 • Academy St & Catalina Blvd Sidewalks • ADA S/W La Jolla Shore & Calle Corta • Ash Street & Richmond Street Sidewalk • Asphalt Resurfacing Group 1502 Option • Asphalt Resurfacing Group 1704 • Balboa Avenue Corridor • City Street Lights - 25 Locations • Citywide Street Lights GF Group 15 • Coast Blvd Sea Cave Emergency Stabilization Project
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation/4
    TRANSPORTATION/4 4.1/OVERVIEW Like the rest of the City, Biloxi’s transportation system was The City of Biloxi is in a rebuilding mode, both to replace aging profoundly impacted by Hurricane Katrina. Prior to Hurricane infrastructure and to repair and improve the roadways and fa- Katrina, the City was experiencing intensive development of cilities that were damaged by Katrina and subsequent storms. coastal properties adjacent to Highway 90, including condo- - minium, casino, and retail projects. Katrina devastated High- lowing reconstruction of U.S. Highway 90, the Biloxi Bridge, way 90 and other key transportation facilities, highlighting andPre-Katrina casinos. traffic Many volumes transportation and congestion projects haveare in returned progress fol or Biloxi’s dependence on a constrained network of roadways under consideration, providing an opportunity for coordinat- and bridges connecting to inland areas. ed, long-range planning for a system that supports the future The City of Biloxi operated in a State of Emergency for over land use and development pattern of Biloxi. In that context, two years following Hurricane Katrina’s landfall on August 29, the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan lays 2005. Roadway access to the Biloxi Peninsula is provided by out a strategy to develop a multi-modal system that improves Highway 90 and Pass Road from the west and by three key mobility and safety and increases the choices available to resi- bridges from the east and north: Highway 90 via the Biloxi dents and visitors to move about the City. Bay Bridge from Oceans Springs and I-110 and Popp’s Ferry Road over Back Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobs Center Directions
    JACOBS CENTER DIRECTIONS EHC’s 2016 Annual Awards Celebration Email: [email protected] 404 Euclid Avenue Phone: (619) 527-6161 San Diego, CA 92114 DIRECTIONS B Y C A R From Downtown Take G Street east to the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. From Mission Valley or Interstate 8 Go south on Interstate 805, exit east at the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. From North County Go south on Interstate 805, exit east at the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. From East County Go west on the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. From South Bay Go North on Interstate 805, exit east at the Martin Luther King Freeway (Hwy. 94) and exit at Euclid Avenue south. Take a right on Market Street. Take a left at Market Creek Plaza Driveway. Event Parking in the lot on the right. B Y B U S Market Creek is steps away from the convenient Euclid Transit Station, near the corner of Euclid Avenue and Market Street.Several bus lines service the Euclid Transit Station from all areas of San Diego.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Valley Groundwater Aquifer
    General Information Mission Valley Groundwater Aquifer Overview • General Information Home • History • Contact Information • Geology • Water Emergencies • Pueblo Water Rights • Your Plumbing System • Grand Jury Report 2013 • Customer Outreach • Water Supply Contamination & Clean-up Status • Press Releases • History o Contamination Chronology • Clean-up Status o Spill Prevention, Control, And Countermeasure Plan (SPCC) and Barrier Containment • Regional Water Quality Control Board Oversight o Documents Water Supply Development • Conceptual Project • Field Investigations • Model Development OVERVIEW The Mission Valley Aquifer (MVA) follows the course of the San Diego River from Mission Gorge on the east to the Pacific Ocean on the west and is bound by its valley walls and covers about 6.2 square miles. The MVA is typical of riverine aquifers of southern California consisting of deposits of primarily gravel and sand conducive for high- yielding groundwater wells. Mission Valley, its aquifer and river system, provided water to help establish and sustain the San Diego Mission dating back to 1769. A well field in the MVA, that spanned a distance from where Qualcomm Stadium is located to the Interstate 805 & Interstate 8 interchange, served as one of the City of San Diego’s (City’s) primary sources of drinking water from about 1914 until 1936. The City owns a special water right called a Pueblo right, which is a prior and paramount right to all of the water of the San Diego River (surface and underground). Eventually it was understood that local water supplies would not meet the ultimate demand for water, thus the City began importing water in the late 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • December 11, 2012- Board of Supervisors
    THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS ACTION AGENDA SUMMARY DEPT: Chief Executive Office BOARDAGENDA#~*B~-~6~ _ Urgent 0 Routine ~ AGENDA DATE December 11,2012 CEO Concurs with Recommendation YES 4/5 Vote Required YES 0 NO ~ (Infor SUBJECT: Approval to Adopt a Resolution in Support of the Efforts of the California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley and the Delta Counties Coalition on Water Management Actions of Value to Stanislaus County STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Adopt a Resolution in Support of the Efforts of the California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley and the Delta Counties Coalition on Water Management Actions of Value to Stanislaus County FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts associated with this item. A member of the Board of Supervisors is appointed by the Governor to represent Stanislaus County on the California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley. Board members also have an opportunity to become engaged through the work group structure. County staff provides technical support to Board members based on their work and involvement on an as needed basis within approved departmental bUdgets. BOARD ACTION AS FOLLOWS: No. 2012-597 On motion of Supervisor Withrow , Seconded by Supervisor _J;;bi~~q _ and approved by the following-Yote,- ----------------- -. Ayes: Supervisors:_Ct*~~a,_WithJ9w.J1l19_nJeLtb~D_e_ MqaLnj .smd_ C_h_ajCI119Il_ OJ~cieD _ Noes: Supervisors: ~,to_n_~ _ Excused or Absent: Supervisors: None Abstaining: Supervisor: --Nofle--- -----------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Traveler's Guide
    Florida’s Major Highway Construction Projects: April - June 2018 Interstate 4 24. Charlotte County – Adding lanes and resurfacing from south of N. Jones 46. Martin County – Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the south- 1. I-4 and I-75 interchange -- Hillsborough County – Modifying the eastbound Loop Road to north of US 17 (4.5 miles) bound Rest Area at mile marker 107, three miles south of Martin Highway / and westbound I-4 (Exit 9) ramps onto northbound I-75 into a single entrance 25. Charlotte County – Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the SR 714 (Exit 110), near Palm City; the northbound Rest Area at mile marker point with a long auxiliary lane. (2 miles) northbound and southbound Weigh Stations at mile marker 158 106, four miles south of Martin Highway /SR 714 (Exit 110) near Palm City; the southbound Weigh-in-Motion Station at mile marker 113, one mile south of 2. Polk County -- Reconstructing the State Road 559 (Ex 44) interchange 26. Lee County -- Replacing 13 Dynamic Message Signs from mile marker 117 to mile marker 145 Becker Road (Exit 114), near Palm City; and the northbound Weigh-in-Motion 3. Polk County -- Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the eastbound Station at mile marker 92, four miles south of Bridge Road (Exit 96), near 27. Lee County – Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the northbound and westbound Rest Areas at mile marker 46. Hobe Sound and southbound Rest Areas at mile marker 131 4. Polk County -- Installing a new Fog/Low Visibility Detection System on 47.
    [Show full text]
  • California Highways and Public Works
    Install traffic signals, highway light­ San Joaquin Road. Estimated cost, Rights-of-way on various state high­ ing and channelization at the intersec­ $67,000; State's share, $56,000; balance way routes-$9,468,000, including ap­ tion of MacArthur Boulevard (new to be shared by the county and New­ proximately $4,000,000 on Interstate State Route 7 3) and Palisades Road- port Beach. 405 (San Diego Freeway). SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES PROJECTS Imperial County limit of Camp Mathews and 0.5 mile and near Escondido, a distance of 2. 3 Construct four-lane U.S. 99-State south of Carmel Valley Road in San miles. Estimated cost, $500,000. Sign Route 111 Expressway between Diego with interchanges at Genesee Widen the Clairemont Mesa Boule­ State Sign Route 98 in Calexico and Avenue, Sorrento Valley Road, and vard Overcrossing from two lanes to County Road 16, 0.5 mile south of the the future Interstate 805 Freeway in four and revise the interchange con­ future Interstate 8 Freeway; and Sorrento Valley, a distance of 3.4 nections to U.S. 395 in San Diego. Es­ widen and resurface State Sign Route miles. Estimated cost, $6,230,000. timated cost, $390,000; State's share, 111 between County Road 16 and U.S. Construct eight-lane section for fu­ $340,000; city, $50,000. 80 east of El Centro. Estimated cost, ture San Diego Freeway (Interstate Construct four-lane State Sign $2,350,000. 5) between 0.1 mile south of San Route 67 Freeway between 1.5 miles Widen and resurface State Sign Marcos Road near Encinitas and 4.4 and 3.2 miles north of Interstate 8 Route 98 between 0.1 mile west of miles south of State Sign Route 78 near Santee.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacant Manufacturing Building 3444 N Summit Drive Toledo, OH 43611 2 SANDS INVESTMENT GROUP EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY
    1 Vacant Manufacturing Building 3444 N Summit Drive Toledo, OH 43611 2 SANDS INVESTMENT GROUP EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY: BILL ROBERTSON COLE KOEPSELL Lic. # 403061 Lic. # 405304 770.672.5614 | DIRECT 770.672.5564 | DIRECT [email protected] [email protected] SOLOMON COLVIN III SCOTT REID Lic. # 205030 OH Lic. # BRKP.2020001224 770.744.4555 | DIRECT 949.942.6585 | DIRECT [email protected] [email protected] 1501 Johnson Ferry Road, Suite 200 Marietta, GA 30062 844.4.SIG.NNN www.SIGnnn.com In Cooperation With ParaSell, Inc., A Licensed Ohio Broker Lic. # REC.2020005946 BoR: Scott Reid – Lic. # BRKP.2020001224 3 SANDS INVESTMENT GROUP TABLE OF CONTENTS 04 06 11 INVESTMENT OVERVIEW PROPERTY OVERVIEW AREA OVERVIEW Investment Summary Property Images City Overview Investment Highlights Location, Aerial & Retail Maps Demographics © 2021 Sands Investment Group (SIG). The information contained in this ‘Offering Memorandum’, has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Sands Investment Group does not doubt its accuracy; however, Sands Investment Group makes no guarantee, representation or warranty about the accuracy contained herein. It is the responsibility of each individual to conduct thorough due diligence on any and all information that is passed on about the property to determine its accuracy and completeness. Any and all projections, market assumptions and cash flow analysis are used to help determine a potential overview on the property, however there is no guarantee or assurance these projections, market assumptions and cash flow analysis are subject to change with property and market conditions. Sands Investment Group encourages all potential interested buyers to seek advice from your tax, financial and legal advisors before making any real estate purchase and transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3-1 4.3 HYDROLOGY and WATER QUALITY This Section Describes Water Resources at Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Hydroelect
    4.3 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.3 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 4.3.1 INTRODUCTION TO HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section describes water resources at Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s hydroelectric facilities and associated Watershed Lands in Northern and Central California, and addresses how utilization and management of the water resources for power production affects the physical environment and other beneficial uses. The section provides an overview of discretionary and non- discretionary factors affecting water use and management, including applicable regulatory constraints. The section then addresses the following for each asset: the location of the drainage basin, the flow of water through the different facilities, a general discussion of water quality, physical characteristics of Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s water conveyance systems and capacities, maximum powerhouse capacities, and considerations, including specific regulatory constraints, that affect the management of water for power production and other purposes. Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s hydroelectric facilities were built, for the most part, in the early and mid part of the 20th Century. The existing facilities and their operations are integrated into the water supply system for the State and can affect water quality in the surrounding watershed. 4.3.1.1 Water Use Water is used at Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s hydroelectric facilities primarily for the nonconsumptive purpose of generating electric power. Other uses include minor consumption at powerhouses and recreational facilities (e.g., for drinking water, sanitation, or maintenance activities), provision of recreational opportunities, sale or delivery to other parties, and fish and wildlife preservation and enhancement.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 5 Corridor Improvements
    Soundwall construction on northbound I-5, Santa Fe Springs, CA. New abutment for the Alondra Blvd. Bridge in Santa Fe Springs. Construction for the new southbound I-5 o-ramp at Imperial Hwy./Pioneer Blvd. in Norwalk. About the Santa Ana Freeway The Interstate 5 Corridor (Interstate 5) South Corridor Interstate 5 Improvement Projects OF TRAN T SP Improvement Projects EN O Interstate 5 in California is a vital north/south artery R M T T A R T A I O P for the travelling public and it is one of the state’s most E N D Six I-5 South Corridor Improvement Projects, extending U A heavily-used corridors to move goods and services N I C T I Corridor E R 6.7 miles between the Los Angeles County/Orange D E M ST A between the borders of Mexico and Canada. County line to the San Gabriel River Freeway (Interstate ATES OF 605), are identied by their location at Valley View Avenue, Improvements The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Alondra Boulevard, Carmenita Road, Rosecrans Avenue, District 7, serving Los Angeles and Ventura counties, Imperial Highway and Florence Avenue in the cities of I-5 Corridor Improvement Partners and its regional partners, the Los Angeles County La Mirada, Santa Fe Springs, Norwalk and Downey. South Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), are A $1.6 billion investment on the Santa Ana Freeway investing approximately $3 billion in several Interstate includes widening the roadway to add one High I-5 HOV/Florence Avenue Interchange 5 Corridor Improvement Projects, funded through a Occupancy Vehicle (HOV), or carpool lane, and one combination of federal, state and local resources.
    [Show full text]