EDRS PRICE , from the Original Document. A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EDRS PRICE , from the Original Document. A DOCUMENT RESUME ER 15t 255 SO 010-696 TITLE Eighteenth Strategy for Peace Conference.Regort, October 13-16, 1977. - . INSTITUTION SteCnley f"oundation,; Muscatine.; Iowa.' ' PUB DATE `77 . NOTE-, 87p.; 'Fora'related document, seeSO 010 531; tReport Of the Eighteenth Strategy for Peace Conference 1 Warrenton, Virginia, October 13716, 1977)-; Not O `available in hard copy from EDRS due fo'colored:ink in original document AWAILABLE.FRO,M" Stanley Foundation, Aanley Building, Muscatine,' Iowa (free) EDRS PRICE , MF-$0. 83,Prus Postage. HC Not kvaalable,from (EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Civil Liberties; Cdnference Report's; *ConfliC Resolution; Decisiolk Making,Skills.t; Disarmament; ,Emergency Programs; *Foreign Policy; futures (of §oclety); *Global Approach; Government Role;, Onternational Relations; Justice;,Legil-ation; A Militari Science; National Defense; NuclearWarfare; *Peace; Problem Solving; *Productive Thinking; Racial Integration; Racial Segregation; Space; Technological Advancement; World Affairs;'WOrld PrOblems IDENTIFIERS South Africa; United States, ABSTRACT f The document presents a report of 'a conference to_ stimalate-Pudf, research,,aiid,educationin the'field of foreign ;elations..The. report contains summaries .of smallgroup discussions of 'peace and security, economic order, development,- A resource/population ba ]ance, the environbent, and human rights. this presented in six. sections.SeCtidn summarizesdiscussion,of . non7proiiferation strategy for the late 1970s4)Onemajor,proaosai was- to create multinational nuclear power centers; Section /I-foeuSdS-0,11 .7 long: term straiegieS for' human rights, action, by the: United StateSi and internationalorgallizations to preserve huian rights,, and, - consideration of priorities for action in the field offhuman rights, Section In'identifies'problems of.international.securIty itiouter space, .including unavailability of scientific data,,asd tie absenCe,,, of an internation4sspace monitorrni agency, Section Iv examines ways' to encourage social alnd economic development throUgh technglogy.=. Section V describesoulited States government po4oies'toward the United'Nations, 1978 SpeciarSession-on'Yisarmamtlit: Topics discussed, include alternative security sygtems, the conduct of.disarmament legctiations,-and the role of public and private organizationsin . -promoting yeace."'The final section reviews Q.S. ibreign policy options with regard to soUth-Africa. A directory .of conference conclades the document. (Author/DB):: a ***********'************************************************************ if ReproductiOns supplied by EOS.are the best thatcan be made * * , . from the original document. A - * ' ***********************************0***************************4*44**** ,, , 4 t %LS DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH.. EDUCATION & WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF , EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN 41 E P R °- MUD EXACTLY ASRECEIVED FROM THE-PERSON OR ORGANIZATIONORIGIN. ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OROPJNIONS , STATED DO NOT NECESSARILYREPRE- INSTITUTE OF SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS EIGHTEENTH MATERIAL IN MICROFICHE ONLY HAS BEEN GRANTED BY ,Jae. FORPEACE, TO THE tDUCATIONAL. RESO URCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) AND COnference Report USERS OF THE ERIC SYSTEM " Oct6ber -13-16 . L.r 1-977 CNJ Airlie House r-i Warrenton, Virginia tSl 'Sponsored by CI The Stanley, Foundation 4' .1441-. S k 4 TT- . 2. S III The Eighteenth Strategy for-Peace Conferencecontinued The Stanley Foundation's series of, anni1401 meetings dedicated'toa re-. evaluation of U S foreign policy. Ninety participants froma wide spectrum of disciplines convened to discuss six tOely andimportant issues confronting ace world community. The first Conference to Plan, &Strategy forPeace was held in . June, 1960, to involve leaders in government ad theprofessions throughout the United States in a s'earch fora more enlightened and so' *.forward looking foreign policy, The format of -this conference has beenan informal off-the-record - exchange No time has been spent inpresenting or' debating pre- pared papers or positions No effort has beervexerted toachieve con-. Sensus where difference of opinion-has been evidept. Each group report was. prepared by therapporteur 'to state the es- sence of discussions 'Reports were reviewed by group participants and finally revised by the rapporteur reflecting participants'corn- meets dunng the review session. However, memberssupporting various parts of the report do not necessarily endorse themin their entirety or specific language. Moreover, as participants didnot review the rep Arts of other groups, the reports donot necessarily reflect the ierivs of all members of the Conference. Participants in the Conferenceare in no way,committed to any posi- tion or findings of the discussion grOups, The views iexpressed in thisreport are not necessarily the views ST' 3 The Stanley Foundation. L This report is distributed in the hope that it will stimulate study, re- -search and education in the` field of foreign relations. We urge) that references to, or duplication or distribution of the contents of tills re pgrt be given proper acknowledgriit. k The Stanley Foundation . - Stanley Building Muscbtine. Iowa 52761 U S A IV 4 1 T. 4 4 t, ra Opening Remarks C. Maxwell Stanleg,onference Chairman VII DISCUSSION GROUP REPORTS 1. Non-Proliferation Strategy for the Late . 2. Human Rights and U S. Foreign .11 4,. 3. gutroberleicaocef International Security in 4E 4-1V IScevieenlceop'andnT Technology. International U.N. Special Session on Disarmament: U S Initianves 43 O ,6. Southern Africa: U.S. Policy Options '51 AddrOsg: Joseph S. Nye, Jr. 61 .Participants 71 References 76\ The Stanley Founcration. 77 t. 5 f. OPENING REMARKS oTT By C. Maxwell Stanley "" .0 b St Our Eighteenth Strategy for PeaceConference convenes atan- f auspicious hour. The time isfavorablefor the emergence of 'dynamic' and. innovative U.S. leadership in the worldcommunity's faltering ofi forts to manage global problems. The opporttinityfor leadership is always with us; the nefds of this troutledworld are always present .end Constantly, escalatihg. Now isa unique time due to a fortuitous combinqori of two factors. First, th,Carter Administratio,p has clear- ly demonstrated a determinationto exert O.S. leadership morecoma mensuTate with the inherent responsibility of the largeand powerful. '`\ Second, global attitudes towardaccepting U.S. eadership are more ifavorable than in the recent past. President Carter, before. and since his election,has confronted many facets of U.S: foreign policy boldly. He hascalled for a reduced de. fense budget, together with curtailment ofU.S. sales 4)fconventional weapons. -H4 has urged a new Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) agreenient with lower 'limitson nuclear weapons and at strengthening of detente wish the SovietUnion. Urging substantial re-1 "duction of nuclearweapons, fie has proposed indefinite deferral of 1 reprocessing and, plutonium recycling, delayeddevelopment of 1 $., breeder reactors, and other measure3 intended-to stave off 'prolifera-* tion 9f nuclear weaporis. Greateruse of the United Nations has been erhphasized..The rights, of humans havebecome 'arominent U.S, policy objective. Peacdful resolution ofcontroversi in the Middle East and southerp-Africa is being activelysought a ama Canal treaty, resulting frommany years( of negotiations,' has been alp- ported. , AO 4^..!'" r The Carter Adminstration has ,acted to implement many of these ob- jectives, even though some have been reduced by er-iczunters with vested interests within and without government.. The implementation of same initiatives has appeared paive or ill-timed. It is too early to : judge the success of many of the initiatives, Many of the persons ap- pointed to key foreign p8licy administration positions are kfteten ad- vocates of these new initiatives. On balance, President Carter and his Administranon have given a new thrust to U S. foreign policy grin ciples. Changes in global attitudes toward U.S. leadership result from several factors, not the least of which is the expressed determination of the VIII Carter Achihinistration to' take afresh look at a number of global pioblems Black Africans are impressed by attention given the long neglected problems of southern AfriCa. Developing nations are cautiously hopeful that the United States will continue and expand previous initiatives to dead with global economic problems People everywhere welcome Carter's announced desire to reduce nuclear 'weaponry and applaud proposals for a SALT II treaty with greater limitations than those of the Vladivostok agreement. There are other factors affecting the improved climate, however Na 'tions throughout the world, developed as well as under veJ, ed are feeling increased economic pressures, partly attribute e othe_ burden of military establishments. More national leaders are cogniz ing the need for more effective intemAtional and transnational ap proacheg to world problem solving. More moderate leadership and postures from the Third World, within the Group of 77 (now,grown ' to 110 nations) and other organizations, may be an indication of this attitude. None of these subtle changes mean that the UnitecIPStates can or should clictatworld policy or dominate global decisions. However, a climate is emerging wherein intelligent, and dynamic US. leadership can make mire positive contributions to the resolution of problems plaguing the'Woild. Through my professional activities and those- offhe Stanley Founda-
Recommended publications
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Three at the Paris Peace Conference: Questions and Answers
    The Big Three at the Paris Peace Conference – Questions and Answers These questions and answers are taken from the Big Three at the Paris Peace Conference podcast at www.mrallsophistory.com. Scan the QR code or visit https://goo.gl/0L9Gjp to listen. You might find it useful to cover the answers and then write them in as you listen to the podcast. Where did the Big Three meet to discuss the fate of The Palace of Versailles outside Germany? Paris Who was the British Prime Minister? David Lloyd George Who was the President of the USA? Woodrow Wilson Who was the Prime Minister of France? Georges Clemenceau What is the name of the treaty that Germany signed Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Russia? The British public pressured David Lloyd George to Lemon ‘squeeze Germany like a…’ what? What were Lloyd George’s two key priorities at Peace and trade Versailles? Take some of Germany’s overseas What did Lloyd George hope to do Germany’s Empire? colonies and add them to the British Empire Downloaded from www.mrallsophistory.com In which previous war had France been invaded by - Franco-Prussian War (1870-71) and lost land to - Germany? Roughly what fraction of French soldiers who had served in the French army had been killed or injured in Over two-thirds the war? Make France safe from any possible What was Georges Clemenceau’s primary aim at German attack in the future - to Versailles? weaken Germany as much as possible What kinds of peace did Woodrow Wilson hope for? A just and lasting peace What did he fear might happen if Germany was treated In the
    [Show full text]
  • DASHED HOPES the Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS DASHED HOPES The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar WATCH Dashed Hopes The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar Copyright © 2019 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-36970 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org FEBRUARY 2019 ISBN: 978-1-6231-36970 Dashed Hopes The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 5 I. Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 II. Section 66(d)
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Article “Armistice and the League of Nations” ---- If You Have Access to Google Classroom - Go to Classroom to Complete This Assignment
    Tuesday, May 26, 2020 Read the article “Armistice and the League of Nations” ---- If you have access to Google Classroom - go to Classroom to complete this assignment ---- Read the following article. Think about the relationship between European countries and the fighting and events of World War 1. How Allies felt about the Germans and other Central Power countries. After reading the article, then answer the questions that follow on a separate sheet of paper . Take a picture of your answers and email the picture to your teacher. ( [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ) Armistice and the League of Nations What did the Paris Peace Conference accomplish? Even though Russia left the war, the Allied forces increased their pressure on Germany. The Western Front ’s long standoff was broken in 1918. The Allies advanced to the German border. The Central Powers began to crumble. The Ottoman Empire surrendered at the end of October. Austria-Hungary surrendered on November 3. Germany followed, signing an armistice, or an agreement to stop the war, on November 11. This date became known as Armistice Day. The name was later changed to Veterans Day to honor the veterans of all foreign wars. In January 1919, representatives from the Allied nations gathered to discuss terms of peace. They met in the palace of Versailles outside Paris. The conference became known as the Paris Peace Conference. The treaty the Allies wrote with Germany was called the Treaty of Versailles. The United Kingdom, France, Italy, and the United States made up the “Big Four.” Their representatives were the key players in writing the treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Peace Movement 1815-1914: an Outline
    The international peace movement 1815-1914: an outline Script of an online lecture given by Guido Grünewald on 9 June 2020* I will try to give an outline of the emergence and development of an international peace movement during its first 100 years. Since English is not my mother tongue and I haven’t spoken it for a longer time I will follow a written guideline in order to finish the job in the short time I have. The first peace organisations emerged in America and in Britain. This was no coincidence; while on the European continent after the end of the Napoleonic Wars restoration took over there were evolving democracies in the anglo-Saxon countries and a kind of peace tradition as for example carried by the quakers who renounced any kind of war. For those early societies the question if a war could be defensive and therefore justified was from the beginning a thorny issue. The New York Peace Sciety founded by merchant David Low Dodge followed a fundamental pacifism rejecting all kind of wars while the Massachussets Peace Society (its founder was unitarian minister Noah Worcester) gathered both fundamental pacifists and those who accepted strictly defensive wars. With about 50 other groups both organisations merged to become the American Peace Society in 1828. The London Peace Society had an interesting top-tier approach: its leadership had to pursue a fundamental pacifist course while ordinary members were allowed to have different ideas about defensive wars. On the European continent some short-lived peace organisations emerged only later. The formation of those first societies occured under the influence of Quakers (one of the 3 historic peace churches which renounced violence) and of Christians who were convinced that war was murderous and incompatible with Christian values.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukako Otori, to Be a Modern Instrument of Peace
    YUKAKO OTORI ‘TO BE A MODERN INSTRUMENT OF PEACE: AMERICAN QUAKER PACIFISM IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR’ (University of Tokyo: unpublished B.A. thesis, 2009) This thesis explores the profound impact of World War One on modern pacifism and the propulsion of modern Quaker peace testimony. The violence of mechanised, technological trench warfare shocked Progressivist-era America. The traditional isolationism of the United States was challenged by two diametrically-opposed viewpoints: militarism and pacifism. From the nineteenth-century weakening of US Quakerism (through sectarianism, industrialisation and the expansion West), the gradual consolidation of Meetings and the influence of Liberalism paved the way for the strengthening unity brought by anti-violence for the Society of Friends. The tentative path of modern, muscular and secularised US peace testimony is traced from 1914 to the 1917 American entrance to the European War under President Woodrow Wilson. The watershed was 1915, when social feminism met with Quaker faith in action (personified by Jane Addams and Lucy Biddle Lewis). Female activism resulted in the Woman’s Peace Party, a body that privileged maternal rhetoric over suffrage to protest for peace which received international attention through their 1915 participation at the Women’s Peace Congress at The Hague. From such associations, those at the 1915 Quaker Winona Lake Peace Conference and through the consequent Friends’ National Peace Committee, figures like Henry Joel Cadbury, Rufus M. Jones, Hannah Clothier Hull and Lewis
    [Show full text]
  • Women, Peace and Security
    WOMEN, PEACE AND SECURITY asdf United Nations Women, Peace and Security Study submitted by the Secretary-General pursuant to Security Council resolution 1325 (2000) United Nations 2002 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publi- cation do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secre- tariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The term “country” as used in the text of this publication also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters com- bined with figures. United Nations Publication Sales No.E.03.IV.1 ISBN 92-1-130222-6 Copyright© United Nations, 2002 All rights reserved Contents Abbreviations ……………………………………………………… v Foreword …………………………………………………………… ix Acknowledgements …………………………………………….….. xi I. Introduction ………………………………………………... 1 II. Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Girls ………….... 13 A. Violence against women and girls ………………….… 14 B. Health of women and girls ………………………..…... 18 C. Socio-economic dimensions ………………………….. 22 D. Displacement: women and girls as refugees, returnees and internally displaced persons .………...…………… 25 E. Disappearance and detention ……………………….… 29 F. Challenges to gender roles and relations ……….…….. 30 III. International Legal Framework ……………………….…... 33 A. International humanitarian law and human rights law .. 33 B. Redress for women and girls for conflict-related abuses …………………………………………………. 38 C. Reparations for victims of conflict ………………….... 46 D. Protecting refugee and internally displaced women and girls …………………………….…………………. 47 E. Challenges …………………………………………..… 48 IV. Peace Processes ………………………………………... 53 A. Involvement of women and girls in informal peace processes ………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • A Sheffield Hallam University Thesis
    The Sheffield peace movement 1934-1940. STEVENSON, David Anthony Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/3916/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/3916/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. REFERENCE ProQuest Number: 10701051 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10701051 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 The Sheffield Peace Movement 1934 -1940 David Anthony Stevenson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2001 Abstract: The object of the thesis was to build a portrait of a local peace movement in order to contrast and compare it with existing descriptions of the peace movement written from a national perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposing the True Costs of War and Militarism Since 1985 VETERANSVETERANS FORFOR PEACEPEACE Organized Locally
    Exposing the True Costs of War and Militarism Since 1985 VETERANSVETERANS FORFOR PEACEPEACE Organized locally. Recognized Internationally. VFP NEWSLETTER veteransforpeace.org WINTER 2019 STAYING HUMAN: Deported Veterans provide aid to asylum seekers at the Tijuana border By Mike Tork how bad things get. Seguiré siendo humano. Meet your Deported Veterans Before I share what I saw What started out as a trip to learn firsthand what was regarding the asylum seek- happening on the border and help provide a little aid to asylum ers, I want to remind every- seekers ended up being much more. one that the veterans I met First and foremost, I would like to thank Hector Lopez, Lupita with in Tijuana are just that. Cibrian, Robert Vivar, Blanca Viramontes, and Jan Ruhman for They served their county not only welcoming me, but also helping me understand, and honorably, many in combat, see, what was happening along the Tijuana border. many highly decorated, but Lupita, Robert, and Blanca prepare What I saw was a very strong community of Deported Vet- were deported for mistakes sandwiches for asylum seekers. erans (Unified Deported Veterans/VFP Sgt. Barrios Memorial they made after being dis- Chapter 182) and supporters who unselfishly set aside their charged—mistakes like those made by so many fellow veterans own struggles to help asylum seekers. I also saw a community after returning home. Although others of us have been forgiven of veterans supporting each other through difficult times, shar- for our mistakes, they have not. They remain deported, sepa- ing what they can. It inspired me to remain human—no matter rated from family and friends, without the opportunity to make amends or move forward.
    [Show full text]
  • What Were the Aims of the 'Big Three' at the Paris Peace Conference? Interleaving
    Paper 1, Section B Conflict and Tension, 1918-1939 The Treaty of Versailles What were the aims of the 'Big Three' at the Paris Peace Conference? Interleaving . low stakes questions. 1. When was the German Empire created? P31 2. Who was the Kaiser? P31 3. What is militarism? P31 4. What did Kaiser Wilhelm want to make Germany? 5. What was Germany like before 1871? Pink box p31 Challenge 6. Why did the Kaiser dislike democracy? P31 2. Who was the Kaiser? P31 The person in charge of Germany, inherited his position and ruled like a King. 3. What is militarism? P31 The strengthening of Germany’s military eg the army and the navy and using it to increase Germany’s influence. 4. What did Kaiser Wilhelm want to make Germany? A world power. 5. What was Germany like before 1871? Pink box p31 Lots of small states. Challenge 6. Why did the Kaiser dislike democracy? P31 He thought it was weak and didn’t like working with the Reichstag. He preferred to put his trust in the army. World War One had devastated Europe economically, industrially and socially. About 8 million soldiers and 8 million civilians were dead. Towns and villages were flattened, farms were destroyed and railways had been blown up. It seemed that the world would not be the same again. At the end of the war, the leaders of the winning countries met to decide how to deal with the losing countries - this would be a huge task. The leaders of the winning countries could try to seek revenge or they could try to build a better and more peaceful world.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Events of the 20Th and 21St Centuries*
    Peace Events of the 20th and 21st Centuries* The 20th century witnessed the most destructive wars in human history. Perhaps as many as twenty- five million people died and countless others were wounded; millions more suffered from famine, plague, dislocation, devastation and all the other hardships war can bring. Yet the 20th century also saw the most concerted efforts ever attempted to limit and even prevent war, to constrain arms proliferation, to advance peaceful means of resolving conflicts, to protect human rights, to prosecute war crimes, to prevent genocide, and to promote peace. Listed below in chronological order are some of the more important measures undertaken during the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century in the ongoing worldwide struggle to achieve these goals. Included in the listing are such disparate events as efforts to create global and regional international bodies and other mechanisms for the peaceful resolution of disputes and conflicts; major armistices which sought not only to end wars but also promote lasting peace; treaties and other agreements meant to halt or control the spread and use of weapons, especially weapons of mass destruction; establishment of international standards to promote human rights and discourage crimes and other atrocities against nationalities, civilians, prisoners and combatants; and other significant events intended in one way or another to promote peace or oppose war. Treaties proposed more to end specific conflicts than propose a systemic and lasting peace are generally not included. Many of the treaties and other documents for which links are provided are available from more than one source.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, the Peace Palace, and Internationalism Through Design at the Hague, 1899–1920
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Spring 5-3-2017 "A Vigorous Propaganda": The Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, the Peace Palace, and Internationalism through Design at The Hague, 1899–1920 Daniel Pecoraro CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/167 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Pecoraro 1 “A Vigorous Propaganda”: The Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, the Peace Palace, and Internationalism through Design at The Hague, 1899–1920 By Daniel Pecoraro Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History, Hunter College The City University of New York April 17, 2017 Thesis Sponsor: Elidor Mëhilli April 17, 2017 Elidor Mëhilli Date Signature Elidor Mëhilli April 17, 2017 Manu Bhagavan Date Signature of Second Reader Manu Bhagavan Pecoraro 2 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Beginnings of the International Idea at The Hague (pre-1899 Conference) 6 Chapter 2: The 1899 Peace Conference: Political and Local Effects 9 Chapter 3: Mr. Carnegie’s Conundrum: Founding and Funding the Palace 14 Chapter 4: Siting the Palace 18 Chapter 5: The Design Competition and the Betrayal of the International Idea 22 Chapter 6: The 1907 Peace Conference 33 Chapter 7: Thomas Mawson and the Reclamation of Internationalism 36 Chapter 8: Constructing the Peace Palace: Reconciling Nationalism and Internationalism 39 Chapter 9: The Peace Palace Opens 42 Chapter 10: The Peace Palace in World War I 44 Epilogue: Building New International Ideals at The Hague 47 Bibliography 51 Appendix 57 Pecoraro 1 An imposing building stands behind a large metal fence in the background of a postcard from 1913.
    [Show full text]