DOCSLIB.ORG

Read the Article “Armistice and the League of Nations” ---- If You Have Access to Google Classroom - Go to Classroom to Complete This Assignment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Read the Article “Armistice and the League of Nations” ---- If You Have Access to Google Classroom - Go to Classroom to Complete This Assignment Tuesday, May 26, 2020 Read the article “Armistice and the League of Nations” ---- If you have access to Google Classroom - go to Classroom to complete this assignment ---- Read the following article. Think about the relationship between European countries and the fighting and events of World War 1. How Allies felt about the Germans and other Central Power countries. After reading the article, then answer the questions that follow on a separate sheet of paper . Take a picture of your answers and email the picture to your teacher. ( [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ) Armistice and the League of Nations What did the Paris Peace Conference accomplish? Even though Russia left the war, the Allied forces increased their pressure on Germany. The Western Front ’s long standoff was broken in 1918. The Allies advanced to the German border. The Central Powers began to crumble. The Ottoman Empire surrendered at the end of October. Austria-Hungary surrendered on November 3. Germany followed, signing an armistice, or an agreement to stop the war, on November 11. This date became known as Armistice Day. The name was later changed to Veterans Day to honor the veterans of all foreign wars. In January 1919, representatives from the Allied nations gathered to discuss terms of peace. They met in the palace of Versailles outside Paris. The conference became known as the Paris Peace Conference. The treaty the Allies wrote with Germany was called the Treaty of Versailles. The United Kingdom, France, Italy, and the United States made up the “Big Four.” Their representatives were the key players in writing the treaty. France and the United Kingdom wanted to punish the Central Powers. They wanted to make sure the Central Powers would never become a threat to world peace again. The treaties after the war broke apart the Ottoman Empire. They also divided Austria-Hungary into two independent nations. In addition, they called for reparations . That means they wanted defeated countries to pay the winners money. That would help the winners make up for all they had lost in the war. The treaty was particularly harsh on Germany. It stripped Germany of much of its territory. It also said Germany could not unite with Austria. Furthermore, it took apart the German military. It also set high reparation payments. These crippled the German economy for the next 10 years. The League of Nations The world leaders at the Paris Peace Conference wanted to do more than end the current war. World War I had been called the “war to end all wars.” The Paris Peace Conference hoped to make sure that this was the case. President Wilson suggested forming an international group that would keep the peace. It was called the League of Nations. Its purpose would be to settle international problems through means other than war, such as deals or treaties. The goal was to prevent any future wars on the scale of World War I. The European leaders at the Paris Peace Conference strongly supported the League of Nations. They officially established it in 1920. Even though the League of Nations was Wilson’s idea, he failed to convince the U.S. Senate to agree to join. After their first global war, many in the United States feared joining the League of Nations. They worried they would get mixed up in future European battles. As a result, the United States never joined the League of Nations. Writing Assignment: (on separate sheet of paper) 1. November 11 has come to signify the end of the war. Why is it now known as Veterans Day? 2. How were the following Central Powers countries punished by the Treaty of Versailles? a. Ottoman Empire b. Austria-Hungary c. Germany 3. What was the purpose of the League of Nations. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Three at the Paris Peace Conference: Questions and Answers
    The Big Three at the Paris Peace Conference – Questions and Answers These questions and answers are taken from the Big Three at the Paris Peace Conference podcast at www.mrallsophistory.com. Scan the QR code or visit https://goo.gl/0L9Gjp to listen. You might find it useful to cover the answers and then write them in as you listen to the podcast. Where did the Big Three meet to discuss the fate of The Palace of Versailles outside Germany? Paris Who was the British Prime Minister? David Lloyd George Who was the President of the USA? Woodrow Wilson Who was the Prime Minister of France? Georges Clemenceau What is the name of the treaty that Germany signed Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Russia? The British public pressured David Lloyd George to Lemon ‘squeeze Germany like a…’ what? What were Lloyd George’s two key priorities at Peace and trade Versailles? Take some of Germany’s overseas What did Lloyd George hope to do Germany’s Empire? colonies and add them to the British Empire Downloaded from www.mrallsophistory.com In which previous war had France been invaded by - Franco-Prussian War (1870-71) and lost land to - Germany? Roughly what fraction of French soldiers who had served in the French army had been killed or injured in Over two-thirds the war? Make France safe from any possible What was Georges Clemenceau’s primary aim at German attack in the future - to Versailles? weaken Germany as much as possible What kinds of peace did Woodrow Wilson hope for? A just and lasting peace What did he fear might happen if Germany was treated In the
    [Show full text]
  • DASHED HOPES the Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS DASHED HOPES The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar WATCH Dashed Hopes The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar Copyright © 2019 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-36970 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org FEBRUARY 2019 ISBN: 978-1-6231-36970 Dashed Hopes The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 5 I. Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 II. Section 66(d)
    [Show full text]
  • The International Peace Movement 1815-1914: an Outline
    The international peace movement 1815-1914: an outline Script of an online lecture given by Guido Grünewald on 9 June 2020* I will try to give an outline of the emergence and development of an international peace movement during its first 100 years. Since English is not my mother tongue and I haven’t spoken it for a longer time I will follow a written guideline in order to finish the job in the short time I have. The first peace organisations emerged in America and in Britain. This was no coincidence; while on the European continent after the end of the Napoleonic Wars restoration took over there were evolving democracies in the anglo-Saxon countries and a kind of peace tradition as for example carried by the quakers who renounced any kind of war. For those early societies the question if a war could be defensive and therefore justified was from the beginning a thorny issue. The New York Peace Sciety founded by merchant David Low Dodge followed a fundamental pacifism rejecting all kind of wars while the Massachussets Peace Society (its founder was unitarian minister Noah Worcester) gathered both fundamental pacifists and those who accepted strictly defensive wars. With about 50 other groups both organisations merged to become the American Peace Society in 1828. The London Peace Society had an interesting top-tier approach: its leadership had to pursue a fundamental pacifist course while ordinary members were allowed to have different ideas about defensive wars. On the European continent some short-lived peace organisations emerged only later. The formation of those first societies occured under the influence of Quakers (one of the 3 historic peace churches which renounced violence) and of Christians who were convinced that war was murderous and incompatible with Christian values.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukako Otori, to Be a Modern Instrument of Peace
    YUKAKO OTORI ‘TO BE A MODERN INSTRUMENT OF PEACE: AMERICAN QUAKER PACIFISM IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR’ (University of Tokyo: unpublished B.A. thesis, 2009) This thesis explores the profound impact of World War One on modern pacifism and the propulsion of modern Quaker peace testimony. The violence of mechanised, technological trench warfare shocked Progressivist-era America. The traditional isolationism of the United States was challenged by two diametrically-opposed viewpoints: militarism and pacifism. From the nineteenth-century weakening of US Quakerism (through sectarianism, industrialisation and the expansion West), the gradual consolidation of Meetings and the influence of Liberalism paved the way for the strengthening unity brought by anti-violence for the Society of Friends. The tentative path of modern, muscular and secularised US peace testimony is traced from 1914 to the 1917 American entrance to the European War under President Woodrow Wilson. The watershed was 1915, when social feminism met with Quaker faith in action (personified by Jane Addams and Lucy Biddle Lewis). Female activism resulted in the Woman’s Peace Party, a body that privileged maternal rhetoric over suffrage to protest for peace which received international attention through their 1915 participation at the Women’s Peace Congress at The Hague. From such associations, those at the 1915 Quaker Winona Lake Peace Conference and through the consequent Friends’ National Peace Committee, figures like Henry Joel Cadbury, Rufus M. Jones, Hannah Clothier Hull and Lewis
    [Show full text]
  • World War I a Timeline of World War I
    World war i A Timeline of World War I February 25 November 11 Zimmerman Armistice Day Telegram April 22 - Germans Fighting on the Britain gives use Gas Germans fire September 15 Western Front June 28 - shells filled with chlorine President Wilson a First Tanks message to Mexico stops when an Treaty of gas at Allied lines. It’s ever in Battle. They are from Germany, armistice with Versailles June 28 - the first time that large successful in breaking through outlining a deal with Germany comes peace Assassination of Archduke amounts of gas are barbed wire and clearing a Mexico to invade into effect at 11 agreement is Franz Ferdinand used in battle, and the path for infantry, but not in U.S. a.m. signed winning the war. prince to the Austria-Hungary result is the near- between throne, in Sarajevo by a collapse of the French April 6 Germany Serbian named lines. and the Allies Gavrilo Princip U.S. Enters the War 1914 1915 1915 1916 1917 1918 1914 1919 1914 1919 August 1916 1917 July 28 14 May 7 Austria-Hungary September 18 February- Germany Lusitania Sinks declares war on A German Germany Limits December March 3 invades Battle of Serbia submarine sinks Submarines February 1st Treaty of Brest-Litovsk Belgium Verdun Russia begins the passenger liner Reacting to Submarines Germany and Russia Sign Longest Battle Back mobilizing its troops Lusitania. The ship outrage at the of WWI - Peace. Russia leaves carries 1,198 sinking of the Germany the war 305,000 Dead resumes people, 128 of Lusitania, unrestricted Germany stops them Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Women, Peace and Security
    WOMEN, PEACE AND SECURITY asdf United Nations Women, Peace and Security Study submitted by the Secretary-General pursuant to Security Council resolution 1325 (2000) United Nations 2002 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publi- cation do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secre- tariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The term “country” as used in the text of this publication also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters com- bined with figures. United Nations Publication Sales No.E.03.IV.1 ISBN 92-1-130222-6 Copyright© United Nations, 2002 All rights reserved Contents Abbreviations ……………………………………………………… v Foreword …………………………………………………………… ix Acknowledgements …………………………………………….….. xi I. Introduction ………………………………………………... 1 II. Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Girls ………….... 13 A. Violence against women and girls ………………….… 14 B. Health of women and girls ………………………..…... 18 C. Socio-economic dimensions ………………………….. 22 D. Displacement: women and girls as refugees, returnees and internally displaced persons .………...…………… 25 E. Disappearance and detention ……………………….… 29 F. Challenges to gender roles and relations ……….…….. 30 III. International Legal Framework ……………………….…... 33 A. International humanitarian law and human rights law .. 33 B. Redress for women and girls for conflict-related abuses …………………………………………………. 38 C. Reparations for victims of conflict ………………….... 46 D. Protecting refugee and internally displaced women and girls …………………………….…………………. 47 E. Challenges …………………………………………..… 48 IV. Peace Processes ………………………………………... 53 A. Involvement of women and girls in informal peace processes ………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Armistice of November 1918: Centenary Table of Contents Debate on 5 November 2018 1
    Armistice of November 1918: Centenary Table of Contents Debate on 5 November 2018 1. Events Leading to the Armistice of November 1918 Summary 2. Armistice of November 1918 This House of Lords Library Briefing has been prepared in advance of the debate due to take place on 5 November 2018 in the House of Lords on the 3. Centenary motion moved by Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative), “that this House takes Commemorations of the note of the centenary of the armistice at the end of the First World War”. Armistice in the UK On 11 November 1918, an armistice between the Allied Powers and Germany was signed, ending the fighting on the western front during the First World War. The armistice was signed at 5am in a French railway carriage in Compiègne, and the guns stopped firing six hours later, at 11am. Under the terms of the armistice, Germany was to relinquish all the territory it had conquered since 1914, as well as Alsace-Lorraine. The Rhineland would be demilitarised, and the German fleet was to be interned in harbours of neutral countries or handed to the British. Announcing the terms in the House of Commons, the British Prime Minister, David Lloyd George, expressed relief at the “end[ing of] the cruellest and most terrible war that has ever scourged mankind”. The centenary of the signing of the armistice will be marked on 11 November 2018 by a series of events. The traditional national service of remembrance at the Cenotaph will take place, as well as the Royal British Legion’s veteran dispersal and march past the Cenotaph.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sheffield Hallam University Thesis
    The Sheffield peace movement 1934-1940. STEVENSON, David Anthony Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/3916/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/3916/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. REFERENCE ProQuest Number: 10701051 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10701051 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 The Sheffield Peace Movement 1934 -1940 David Anthony Stevenson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2001 Abstract: The object of the thesis was to build a portrait of a local peace movement in order to contrast and compare it with existing descriptions of the peace movement written from a national perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the Centennial of Poland's Rebirth As a Sovereign Nation
    CONFERENCE Celebrating the centennial of Poland’s rebirth as a sovereign nation & American–Polish diplomatic relations ORGANIZED BY VSU DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY 9 November 2018 UNDER THE HONORARY PATRONAGE OF H.E. Piotr Wilczek, Ambassador of the Republic of Poland to the United States CONFERENCE IDEA: Why celebrate? Americans remember 11 November 1918 as “Armistice Day,” the end of fighting during World War I. Poles also celebrate this day, not only for a successful conclusion to the Great War, but to honor the restoration of Polish independence. After more than a century of subjugation, Polish patriots took back control of their lands. This started a new struggle, one that lasted another three years before independence was guaranteed. America strongly supported these efforts, starting with President Woodrow Wilson’s powerful endorsement of Polish independence. Less than two months after Armistice Day, America and Poland established diplomatic relations. From that point onward, even during the height of the Cold War, the two nations maintained cordial relations. Today Poland and America have excellent ties, and our conference hopes to illuminate the historical antecedents of these connections. CONFERENCE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE: Ewa Barczyk, John P. Dunn (VSU), Anna Mazurkiewicz (UG), and Ivan Nikolov (VSU). Student volunteers: Courtney Boone, Austin Danielski, Eric Henderson, Kevin Lancaster, Connor McCarthy, Hunter Tanner, Sam Tucker, Joey Matt Dillon Bell, Grier Rogers, and Tahbius Hughes. RELATED CONFERENCE EVENTS at VSU: EXHIBIT Highlights of POLAND: Poster collection on loan from the Polish Embassy in Washington -- on the second floor of the Ashley Hall rotunda for one week. Images of Poland: its natural wonders, biggest cities, points of interest and more… STUDENT CONTEST POLISH TRACES IN THE AMERICAN SOUTH – Student photo & essay competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on Armistice Day, November 11, 2018: Galloway Ridge
    Remarks on Armistice Day, November 11, 2018: Galloway Ridge Dr. Samuel R. Williamson, Jr. “The Armistice: November 11, 1918 An Ending and a Beginning: Reflections a Century Later” At 11 a.m. on the 11th day of the 11th month of November 1918, the guns fell silent. After four years of ghastly warfare, “All was quiet on the western front.” In the weeks since late September 1918 and talk of a possible armistice, a veritable revolution had occurred in Europe. Though formally called an armistice, American President Woodrow Wilson and his erstwhile European allies had converted the prospect of an armistice into a German surrender. In the process they hastened the end of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, doomed the Ottoman Empire, and brought the collapse of the German government in Berlin. While the final peace treaty would be signed at Versailles on June 28, 1919, the armistice of November 11 became the pivotal day in European history. When the changes were later assessed, they were monumental, fundamental, and not necessarily a harbinger of future peace. But the killing had stopped with a total 2 of nine million combat deaths and another ten million deaths from the flu and assorted medical issues. What had begun in late July 1914 as an expected short war had ended badly. I Twenty months ago, many of you were present when we analyzed America’s entry into the First World War on April 6, 1917. Today, in very abbreviated form, we want to track America’s mobilization and then the deployment of more than 2 million troops to France in 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposing the True Costs of War and Militarism Since 1985 VETERANSVETERANS FORFOR PEACEPEACE Organized Locally
    Exposing the True Costs of War and Militarism Since 1985 VETERANSVETERANS FORFOR PEACEPEACE Organized locally. Recognized Internationally. VFP NEWSLETTER veteransforpeace.org WINTER 2019 STAYING HUMAN: Deported Veterans provide aid to asylum seekers at the Tijuana border By Mike Tork how bad things get. Seguiré siendo humano. Meet your Deported Veterans Before I share what I saw What started out as a trip to learn firsthand what was regarding the asylum seek- happening on the border and help provide a little aid to asylum ers, I want to remind every- seekers ended up being much more. one that the veterans I met First and foremost, I would like to thank Hector Lopez, Lupita with in Tijuana are just that. Cibrian, Robert Vivar, Blanca Viramontes, and Jan Ruhman for They served their county not only welcoming me, but also helping me understand, and honorably, many in combat, see, what was happening along the Tijuana border. many highly decorated, but Lupita, Robert, and Blanca prepare What I saw was a very strong community of Deported Vet- were deported for mistakes sandwiches for asylum seekers. erans (Unified Deported Veterans/VFP Sgt. Barrios Memorial they made after being dis- Chapter 182) and supporters who unselfishly set aside their charged—mistakes like those made by so many fellow veterans own struggles to help asylum seekers. I also saw a community after returning home. Although others of us have been forgiven of veterans supporting each other through difficult times, shar- for our mistakes, they have not. They remain deported, sepa- ing what they can. It inspired me to remain human—no matter rated from family and friends, without the opportunity to make amends or move forward.
    [Show full text]