Veterans for Peace National Resolutions (Updated February 2016)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Peace Treaty Between the Republic of Finland and the Russian Socialist Federal Soviet Republic, Signed at Dorpat, October 14, 1920
PEACE TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND AND THE RUSSIAN SOCIALIST FEDERAL SOVIET REPUBLIC, SIGNED AT DORPAT, OCTOBER 14, 1920 Whereas Finland declared its independence in 1917, and Russia has recognised the independence and the sovereignty of Finland within the frontiers of the Grand Duchy of Finland, The Government of the Republic of Finland, and the Government of the Federal Socialist Republic of Soviet Russia, Actuated by a desire to put an end to the war which has since arisen between their States, to establish mutual and lasting peace relations, and to confirm the situation which springs from the ancient political union of Finland and Russia, Have resolved to conclude a Treaty with this object in view, and have selected as their representatives for this purpose, the following: For the Government of the Republic of Finland: M. JUHO KUSTI PAASIKIVI, M. JUHO HEIKKI VENNOLA, M. ALEXANDER FREY, M. KARL RUDOLF WALDEN, M. VÄINÖ TANNER, M. VÄINÖ VOIONMAA, M. VÄINÖ GABRIEL KIVILINNA. For the Federal Socialist Republic of Soviet Russia: M. JEAN ANTONOVITCH BERZINE, M. PLATON MIKHAJLOVITCH KERGENTSEFF, M. NICOLAS SERGUEJEVITCH TIKHMENEFF. Who, after meeting at the town of Dorpat and exchanging their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed to the following provisions: Article 1. From the date upon which this Treaty shall come into force, a state of war shall cease to exist between the Contracting Powers, and the two Powers shall mutually undertake to maintain, for the future, an attitude of peace and goodwill towards one another. Article 2. The frontier between the States of Russia and of Finland shall be as follows: 1. -
Examining the Civil-Military Divide Through New (Institutional) Lenses: the Influence of the Supreme Court
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses November 2016 Examining the Civil-Military Divide Through New (Institutional) Lenses: The Influence of the Supreme Court Allen Linken University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the American Politics Commons, Courts Commons, Military and Veterans Studies Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, Other Legal Studies Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Linken, Allen, "Examining the Civil-Military Divide Through New (Institutional) Lenses: The Influence of the Supreme Court" (2016). Doctoral Dissertations. 759. https://doi.org/10.7275/8980257.0 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/759 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXAMINING THE CIVIL-MILITARY DIVIDE THROUGH NEW (INSTITUTIONAL) LENSES: THE INFLUENCE OF THE SUPREME COURT A Dissertation Presented by ALLEN E. LINKEN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2016 Political Science © Copyright by Allen E. Linken 2016 All Rights Reserved EXAMINING THE CIVIL-MILITARY DIVIDE THROUGH NEW (INSTITUTIONAL) LENSES: THE INFLUENCE OF THE SUPREME COURT A Dissertation Presented by ALLEN E. LINKEN Approved as to style and content by: ________________________________ John Brigham, Chair ________________________________ Jane E. -
Pacifist War
arts Article From Horrors Past to Horrors Future: Pacifist War Art (1919–1939) Lauren Jannette Department of History, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; [email protected] Received: 22 April 2020; Accepted: 7 July 2020; Published: 13 July 2020 Abstract: In this paper, I argue that interwar pacifists working in France presented an evolving narrative of what the First World War represented in order to maintain support for their movement and a continued peace in Europe. Utilizing posters, photographs, pamphlets, and art instillations created by pacifist organizations, I interject in ongoing debates over the First World War as a moment of rupture in art and pacifism in France, arguing that the moment of rupture occurred a decade after the conflict had ended with the failure of the Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments of 1932–1934 and the election of Hitler as the leader of a remilitarized Germany. Pacifist art of the 1920s saw a return to traditional motifs and styles of art that remembered the horrors of the past war. This return to tradition aimed to inspire adherence to the new pacifist organizations in the hopes of creating a new peace-filled world. The era of optimism and tradition ended with the economic and political crisis of the early 1930s, forcing pacifists to reconceptualize the images and styles of art that they utilized. Instead of relying on depictions of the horrors of the past war, these images shifted the focus to the mass civilian casualties future wars would bring in a desperate struggle to prevent the outbreak of another world war. -
Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government. -
UUAA Veterans for Peace Annual Report 2020-2021 Group Leader: Michael Muha
UUAA Veterans for Peace Annual Report 2020-2021 Group Leader: Michael Muha UUAA Veterans for Peace is part of a larger organization, Veterans for Peace, which is a global organization of Military Veterans and allies whose collective efforts are to build a culture of peace by using our experiences and lifting our voices. We inform the public of the true causes of war and the enormous costs of wars (including physical, psychological, emotional, environmental), with an obligation to heal the wounds of wars. Our network is comprised of over 140 chapters worldwide whose work includes: educating the public, advocating for a dismantling of the war economy, providing services that assist veterans and victims of war, and most significantly, working to end all wars. We didn’t do what we anticipated because of not having the usual social contact. Along with our parent organization, Veterans for Peace Chapter 93, accomplished the following: • Martin Luther King Day presentations EMU, UM, and Ann Arbor Public Library, with the theme “Beyond Militarism: Where Do We Go From Here?” (https://aadl.org/node/575155) • Ann Arbor’s Veterans Park on Veterans Day, and Detroit’s Grand Circus Park on July 4, erected a memorial for military members from Michigan killed in Iraq and Afghanistan - to remind people of the costs of war • Awarded scholarships to student who will pursue studies in a Peace Studies program or other program that actively promotes the study of global conflict resolution or issues of peace and justice. • To fund our scholarships, hosted a virtual John Lennon Birthday Concert with local musicians, and created a CD: https://www.vfp93.org/john-lennon-concert-cd We definitely relate to the Sixth Principle: The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all, as well as the First Principle: The inherent worth and dignity of every person, and the Seventh Principle: Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part. -
VVAW's December 2005 Letter
VIETNAM VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR, INC PO Box 408594, Chicago, IL 60640 - (773) 276-4189 www.vvaw.org [email protected] Dear Friend of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, What a difference a year makes! Not only have the American people turned against the war, but Vietnam Veterans Against the War has been able to make a bigger contribution to changing people’s minds about the war than ever before. At our late October National Meeting, the best attended in many, many years, we resolved to further deepen our participation in the national anti-war movement. We heard local representatives talk about their speaking to high school classes, raising funds for the My Lai Peace Park in Vietnam, representing veterans at local anti-war demonstrations, offering personal support to returning Iraq vets, attending local vigils on the night of the 2000th U.S military death in the Iraq war, and engaging in civil disobedience at the White House. Ray Parrish, our military counselor, regularly makes a real difference in the lives of individual veter- ans and GI’s. Ray tells me that some vets who call him want to deal with their Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms in a political rather than a clinical setting. One vet he talked to had done two tours in Iraq. After the first tour, John didn’t really want to go back, but he didn’t talk to anyone in the GI counsel- ing movement because he was hearing from military commanders that people who opposed the war didn’t support the troops. He told Ray that, between tours, “he and Johnny Walker became best friends.” John got out of the military after his second tour. -
Gentlemen Under Fire: the U.S. Military and Conduct Unbecoming
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 26 Issue 1 Article 1 June 2008 Gentlemen under Fire: The U.S. Military and Conduct Unbecoming Elizabeth L. Hillman Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Elizabeth L. Hillman, Gentlemen under Fire: The U.S. Military and Conduct Unbecoming, 26(1) LAW & INEQ. 1 (2008). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol26/iss1/1 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Gentlemen Under Fire: The U.S. Military and "Conduct Unbecoming" Elizabeth L. Hillmant Introduction ..................................................................................1 I. Creating an Officer Class ..................................................10 A. "A Scandalous and Infamous" Manner ...................... 11 B. The "Military Art" and American Gentility .............. 12 C. Continental Army Prosecutions .................................15 II. Building a Profession .........................................................17 A. Colonel Winthrop's Definition ...................................18 B. "A Stable Fraternity" ................................................. 19 C. Old Army Prosecutions ..............................................25 III. Defending a Standing Army ..............................................27 A. "As a Court-Martial May Direct". ............................. 27 B. Democratization and its Discontents ........................ 33 C. Cold War Prosecutions ..............................................36 -
Voices of Conscience: Antiwar Opposition in the Military
Voices of Conscience: Antiwar Opposition in the Military Photo: Paul Richards (Estuary Press) May 22-24, 2018 Welcome Welcome to the “Voices of Conscience” conference, the first major academic conference ever held on military antiwar movements. Never before have scholarly and activist communities come together at a major academic institution to probe the impact of soldier and veterans’ antiwar movements and their importance for the strategy of peace. This gathering is historic in another sense. It takes place 50 years after the Vietnam War, a war in which many of us fought and resisted, and 15 years since the invasion of Iraq when others of us spoke out for peace. We gather as the United States continues an endless “war on terror,” conducting combat support operations in 14 countries and launching air strikes in seven, all without constitutional authority and with few citizens aware or concerned. We will address many vital questions during this conference. What was the role of the GI and veterans’ movement in helping bring an end to the U.S. war in Vietnam? How did the collapse of the armed forces affect the Pentagon’s ability to continue waging war? What was the relationship between the military and civilian antiwar movements? How was the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq affected by antiwar opposition? How did dissent within the ranks affect public opinion on ending the war in Vietnam? What can veterans and military service members do today to counter militarism and war and build support for peace? The historic campaigns we examine in this conference are linked to the movements of today, especially to the students and community activists organizing against the scourge of gun violence in our schools and on our streets, just as we march to prevent war and armed violence abroad. -
Fall/Winter 2020
The Reporter for Conscience’ Sake The Center on Conscience & War Working to defend and extend the rights of Conscientious Objectors to war since 1940 Volume 77 Fall 2020 The Little Commission that Could, but Didn’t: A Recap of the Three Year Journey of the Commission on Military, National and Public Service By Bill Galvin and Maria Santelli That all changed on January 24, 2013, when then Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced the When President Carter resumed draft registration end of the ‘combat exclusion’ of women. With that in 1980, there was widespread opposition. The official change in policy the justification for the 1981 wounds of the U.S. war in Vietnam were still fresh. decision was invalidated, and almost immediately The draft ended in 1973; the war, and with it draft officials and activists began to call for the inclusion of registration, ended in 1975. But besides the fatigue women in the draft and Selective Service registration. of war, another part of the resistance to restarting Meanwhile, two court cases challenging the male- registration was about sex discrimination. A court only registration were working their way through case challenging the male-only registration as the courts and suddenly had a renewed urgency. unconstitutional had actually succeeded in the Bills requiring women to register with Selective lower courts. On July 18, 1980, just days before the Service were introduced in Congress. In 2016, the registration was scheduled to begin, Walter Cronkite, Senate approved an amendment to the 2017 National who, at that time, was considered the ‘most trusted Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) to require man in America,’ announced on the evening news women to register for the draft, but the House did that men did not have to register because of the court not. -
The Abu Ghraib Convictions: a Miscarriage of Justice
Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal Volume 32 Article 4 9-1-2013 The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice Robert Bejesky Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Robert Bejesky, The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice, 32 Buff. Envtl. L.J. 103 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj/vol32/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ABU GHRAIB CONVICTIONS: A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE ROBERT BEJESKYt I. INTRODUCTION ..................... ..... 104 II. IRAQI DETENTIONS ...............................107 A. Dragnet Detentions During the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq.........................107 B. Legal Authority to Detain .............. ..... 111 C. The Abuse at Abu Ghraib .................... 116 D. Chain of Command at Abu Ghraib ..... ........ 119 III. BASIS FOR CRIMINAL CULPABILITY ..... ..... 138 A. Chain of Command ....................... 138 B. Systemic Influences ....................... 140 C. Reduced Rights of Military Personnel and Obedience to Authority ................ ..... 143 D. Interrogator Directives ................ .... -
The Big Three at the Paris Peace Conference: Questions and Answers
The Big Three at the Paris Peace Conference – Questions and Answers These questions and answers are taken from the Big Three at the Paris Peace Conference podcast at www.mrallsophistory.com. Scan the QR code or visit https://goo.gl/0L9Gjp to listen. You might find it useful to cover the answers and then write them in as you listen to the podcast. Where did the Big Three meet to discuss the fate of The Palace of Versailles outside Germany? Paris Who was the British Prime Minister? David Lloyd George Who was the President of the USA? Woodrow Wilson Who was the Prime Minister of France? Georges Clemenceau What is the name of the treaty that Germany signed Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Russia? The British public pressured David Lloyd George to Lemon ‘squeeze Germany like a…’ what? What were Lloyd George’s two key priorities at Peace and trade Versailles? Take some of Germany’s overseas What did Lloyd George hope to do Germany’s Empire? colonies and add them to the British Empire Downloaded from www.mrallsophistory.com In which previous war had France been invaded by - Franco-Prussian War (1870-71) and lost land to - Germany? Roughly what fraction of French soldiers who had served in the French army had been killed or injured in Over two-thirds the war? Make France safe from any possible What was Georges Clemenceau’s primary aim at German attack in the future - to Versailles? weaken Germany as much as possible What kinds of peace did Woodrow Wilson hope for? A just and lasting peace What did he fear might happen if Germany was treated In the -
Entire Issue
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2007 No. 8 House of Representatives Now, part of my concern over the President Bush talks about democ- Iraq war is that it continues to distract racy in Iraq, but what about democ- U.S. policy, both foreign and domestic, racy in Pakistan, which is much more The House met at 12:30 p.m. and was from more important concerns. The likely to achieve democracy if the U.S. called to order by the Speaker pro tem- threat of international terrorism is did not prop up the Musharraf dictator- pore (Mr. RUPPERSBERGER). real, and it came home to us vividly ship. after 9/11, but the focal point of our war f The media, Mr. Speaker, has reported against terrorism should be Afghani- many times that al Qaeda and the DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO stan, not Iraq. Taliban operate freely out of Pakistan TEMPORE While our soldiers continue to die in where they maintain training camps The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- Baghdad and we spend hundreds of bil- and receive the support of Pakistan’s fore the House the following commu- lions of dollars in Iraq, we are neglect- ISI, the equivalent of the American ing the situation in Afghanistan and nication from the Speaker: CIA. its environs, particularly Pakistan, Last fall, the Pakistan government WASHINGTON, DC, where bin Laden, al Qaeda and the January 16, 2007.