Written Evidence Submitted by the Veterans for Peace UK (INR0067)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Written Evidence Submitted by the Veterans for Peace UK (INR0067) Written evidence submitted by the Veterans for Peace UK (INR0067) Introduction to Veterans for Peace UK Veterans for Peace UK (VFP UK) was founded in London in 2011. Veterans For Peace UK is a voluntary and politically independent ex-services organisation of men and women who have served in conflicts from World War 2 through to Afghanistan. As a result of our collective experiences we firmly believe that “War is not the solution to the problems we face in the 21st century”. We are not a pacifist organisation; we accept the inherent right of self-defence in response to an armed attack. We work to influence the foreign and defence policy of the UK, for the larger purpose of world peace. Summary Given that many of the institutions, legal frameworks and skills necessary to increase international understanding and facilitate global co-operation are already in place, our submission focuses on some foreign policy areas where we believe that more effective use could be made of these existing tools. It is vital to strengthen such resources if we are to achieve peaceful co-existence. The starting point for this Review must be a careful re- evaluation of what is needed to provide genuine and sustainable security. The following are our responses to some of the questions listed in your call for evidence. THE PROCESS OF THE INTEGRATED REVIEW The efficacy of the Review’s process 1. ‘What is Security?’ At present there is no established or agreed answer across government departments and policy makers. What does the state want to ‘secure’? From what, from whom and who for? Once these questions are answered we can then determine how we use our resources: human, industrial, technological, financial, to achieve a secure future and incorporate them into developing FCO priorities. 2. State security currently supersedes human security; the security of each individual to liberty, health, wellbeing and a stable existence free of abuse. The current primary focus of security is on risks and threats concerning ‘enemies’. Conflict then becomes inevitable with an upward spiral of increasingly sophisticated weaponry and combat techniques rather than the pursuit of a stable world based on cooperation and support. We cannot change our approach overnight but we can strategically plan for a change from Armed Forces to Peace and Security Forces and to global cooperation. 3. The Review should seek to re-evaluate our influence and role in the world and how other countries see us. Do we achieve our objectives through an aggressive expensive and ineffective military posture or project our influence through diplomacy, conflict resolution and cooperation? We need to understand why many communities think Britain is a threat to them, and what that threat means? 4. The Review should challenge all assumptions made in previous Reviews about what security actually is. Our current policies oblige FCO to focus on conventional perceptions of ‘threat and risk’ at the expense of development and global cooperation which can offer overwhelmingly better value than reliance of military force. STRATEGY IN UK FOREIGN POLICY The priorities for UK foreign policy strategy We focus on four areas of concern: Security as human and planetary wellbeing and how it can be achieved Ethical foreign policy and support for the UN Effective control of the arms trade Nuclear disarmament What is Security? 5. It is generally accepted that the first duty of government is to ensure the security of its people. But what is real human security? The Prime Minister, in his announcement of the Integrated Review 2020, expressed the need to ‘address the risks and threats we face’. And the Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee rightly comments in his introduction to this inquiry, ‘COVID-19 … underscores the need for collaboration across borders.’ How we shape our foreign policy depends to a great extent on how we define ‘security’. 6. We believe that ‘security’ should be understood in holistic terms of human and planetary wellbeing. In order to feel safe and secure, people everywhere need the basics of adequate income, food and clean water, housing, health care, education, plus leisure time for rest and relaxation, all underpinned by justice, equality of opportunity, and the rule of law. A comprehensive, visionary set of rights and freedoms was enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and supplemented in the UK by the Human Rights Act. 7. These human requirements depend in turn on planetary wellbeing. Only a year ago, the worldwide focus was on the climate crisis and the need for drastic change in human behaviour to prevent the planet from becoming uninhabitable. The global focus may have moved to the present COVID-19 pandemic but the threat of climate catastrophe has not disappeared. Both of these crises contribute to another aspect of the threatened apocalypse: the Head of the World Food Programme warns that we are now on the brink of a food pandemic with the prospect of multiple famines of ‘biblical proportions’. 8. The COVID-19 pandemic will gravely exacerbate global poverty. Oxfam estimates that 500 million more people will be thrown into acute need by the virus and the shutdown. The world will never be peaceful while extremes of poverty and inequality are allowed to exist. 9. Following their meeting in London in November 2019, NATO leaders in their final statement said, ‘We work to increase the security of all’. Yet nowhere in that statement was there any reference to the climate crisis – surely the biggest threat of all at that time (pre-COVID-19). 10.Examples of other threats are those posed by cyberwarfare, terrorism, CBW and above all the use, whether by accident or design, of nuclear weapons. How can Security be achieved? 11.Security needs to be sustainable. To build true security in the world is to work internationally to remove the causes of conflict and instability, be they climate chaos with resulting competition for scarce resources and ensuing mass migration, or the various other forms of injustice or manipulation and domination. Failure to understand and treat such problems at source results in violent social explosions. Marginalised and repressed communities will rebel; elites will be vulnerable. The endless build-up of weaponry and perimeter-denial technology may appear to provide short-term advantage but does little for long-term peace and justice. 12.Security for one country at the expense of others is a failed enterprise, morally bankrupt and likely to trigger yet another round of resentment and violence. 13.Military conflict is not only a humanitarian catastrophe causing unfathomable suffering, it is also an environmental catastrophe, with the inbuilt implications for future suffering and political instability which that entails. War and its preparations contribute significantly to climate change. Scientists for Global Responsibility UK estimates that 6% of global greenhouse gas emissions result from military-related activity. This figure covers the whole cycle: extraction of raw materials and manufacture of equipment and weaponry; trials and training with massive fuel use; maintenance of vast numbers of bases and buildings worldwide; use of fuels and explosives in warfare and resulting fires; extensive rebuilding of devastated infrastructure. Yet there is no obligation on countries to count these military-related emissions or include them in climate change reduction targets. If we are serious about planetary security, this is an area which must be examined. Ethical foreign policy and support for the UN 14.To achieve true sustainable security and a peaceful world, a culture of ethical decision-making in foreign policy matters is needed. Britain still has enviable influence in the world – this should not be squandered but could be enhanced by increased integrity in leadership. The establishment of a Minister for Peace and International Co-operation within the Foreign and Commonwealth Office would put these priorities at the centre of policy making. 15.In ‘strengthening old relationships and building new ones’, the UK should evaluate relationships and alliances carefully, avoiding dubious relationships based on power, profit and manipulation. In recent decades the UK government has allied itself with such dictators as Pinochet, Saddam Hussein, the Assads, Mubarak and the Saudi rulers. By favouring alliances with states which uphold human rights, we could instead set an example to be proud of. 16.Our government should foster widespread support for the principles of the UN and be guided in all foreign policy matters by the UN Charter and the rule of international law. In this way it can truly be ‘a problem-solving and burden-sharing nation’ with a positive influence for good in the world. 17.Article 51 of the Charter states that member states can only use force when exercising their right to self-defence and “until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security”. Otherwise, Article 2 (4) states that all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force. It should be borne in mind that the use of force as a genuine last resort is rarely likely to be necessary if strenuous efforts at diplomacy are pursued, and if ethical policies have already been followed ‘upstream’. 18.As one of only five countries with a permanent seat on the Security Council (the P5), the UK should use its special responsibility to promote necessary reforms, thus helping to build a strong, credible and effective UN: essential if we are to build a safer, fairer and more sustainable world. 19.The P5, along with the 10 other elected member countries of the Security Council can, for instance, vote to authorise the use of force. This democratic system, however, is frequently neutralised by the fact that any permanent member can individually veto any majority decision, thus ensuring that the hegemony of the permanent members continues.
Recommended publications
  • UUAA Veterans for Peace Annual Report 2020-2021 Group Leader: Michael Muha
    UUAA Veterans for Peace Annual Report 2020-2021 Group Leader: Michael Muha UUAA Veterans for Peace is part of a larger organization, Veterans for Peace, which is a global organization of Military Veterans and allies whose collective efforts are to build a culture of peace by using our experiences and lifting our voices. We inform the public of the true causes of war and the enormous costs of wars (including physical, psychological, emotional, environmental), with an obligation to heal the wounds of wars. Our network is comprised of over 140 chapters worldwide whose work includes: educating the public, advocating for a dismantling of the war economy, providing services that assist veterans and victims of war, and most significantly, working to end all wars. We didn’t do what we anticipated because of not having the usual social contact. Along with our parent organization, Veterans for Peace Chapter 93, accomplished the following: • Martin Luther King Day presentations EMU, UM, and Ann Arbor Public Library, with the theme “Beyond Militarism: Where Do We Go From Here?” (https://aadl.org/node/575155) • Ann Arbor’s Veterans Park on Veterans Day, and Detroit’s Grand Circus Park on July 4, erected a memorial for military members from Michigan killed in Iraq and Afghanistan - to remind people of the costs of war • Awarded scholarships to student who will pursue studies in a Peace Studies program or other program that actively promotes the study of global conflict resolution or issues of peace and justice. • To fund our scholarships, hosted a virtual John Lennon Birthday Concert with local musicians, and created a CD: https://www.vfp93.org/john-lennon-concert-cd We definitely relate to the Sixth Principle: The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all, as well as the First Principle: The inherent worth and dignity of every person, and the Seventh Principle: Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.
    [Show full text]
  • VVAW's December 2005 Letter
    VIETNAM VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR, INC PO Box 408594, Chicago, IL 60640 - (773) 276-4189 www.vvaw.org [email protected] Dear Friend of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, What a difference a year makes! Not only have the American people turned against the war, but Vietnam Veterans Against the War has been able to make a bigger contribution to changing people’s minds about the war than ever before. At our late October National Meeting, the best attended in many, many years, we resolved to further deepen our participation in the national anti-war movement. We heard local representatives talk about their speaking to high school classes, raising funds for the My Lai Peace Park in Vietnam, representing veterans at local anti-war demonstrations, offering personal support to returning Iraq vets, attending local vigils on the night of the 2000th U.S military death in the Iraq war, and engaging in civil disobedience at the White House. Ray Parrish, our military counselor, regularly makes a real difference in the lives of individual veter- ans and GI’s. Ray tells me that some vets who call him want to deal with their Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms in a political rather than a clinical setting. One vet he talked to had done two tours in Iraq. After the first tour, John didn’t really want to go back, but he didn’t talk to anyone in the GI counsel- ing movement because he was hearing from military commanders that people who opposed the war didn’t support the troops. He told Ray that, between tours, “he and Johnny Walker became best friends.” John got out of the military after his second tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices of Conscience: Antiwar Opposition in the Military
    Voices of Conscience: Antiwar Opposition in the Military Photo: Paul Richards (Estuary Press) May 22-24, 2018 Welcome Welcome to the “Voices of Conscience” conference, the first major academic conference ever held on military antiwar movements. Never before have scholarly and activist communities come together at a major academic institution to probe the impact of soldier and veterans’ antiwar movements and their importance for the strategy of peace. This gathering is historic in another sense. It takes place 50 years after the Vietnam War, a war in which many of us fought and resisted, and 15 years since the invasion of Iraq when others of us spoke out for peace. We gather as the United States continues an endless “war on terror,” conducting combat support operations in 14 countries and launching air strikes in seven, all without constitutional authority and with few citizens aware or concerned. We will address many vital questions during this conference. What was the role of the GI and veterans’ movement in helping bring an end to the U.S. war in Vietnam? How did the collapse of the armed forces affect the Pentagon’s ability to continue waging war? What was the relationship between the military and civilian antiwar movements? How was the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq affected by antiwar opposition? How did dissent within the ranks affect public opinion on ending the war in Vietnam? What can veterans and military service members do today to counter militarism and war and build support for peace? The historic campaigns we examine in this conference are linked to the movements of today, especially to the students and community activists organizing against the scourge of gun violence in our schools and on our streets, just as we march to prevent war and armed violence abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Ch
    Table of Contents Ch. 27 leads large contingent to SOA protests ........................................................................................................................... 2 Melting weapons of war into bells for peace ................................................................................................................................ 2 Time for apologies ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 “A bayonet is a weapon with a worker at each end.” ......................................................................................................... 3 War depravation has never caused a single case of post traumatic stress. ...................................................................... 5 Iran in the Crosshairs: Stop the March to War .......................................................................................................................... 6 George McGovern, a true candidate for peace ......................................................................................................................... 7 Iran, from previous page ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Occupy Homes and Occupy Minneapolis update ....................................................................................................................... 8 Strib prints
    [Show full text]
  • Handful 2015-09
    1 Handful of Salt Volume XXXVIVXXXVIV,,,, Number 333 September ––– OctoberOctober---- --- November 2015 Calling Young Activist 40 years...half a lifetime? 40 years...a long time to be in a career Leaders! 40 years...a fabulous accomplishment for By Teresa Kinder, YALPista class of 2015 peace and justice in Spokane. and PJALS Office Manager Summer is quickly nearing an end Yes--beginning in October 2015 , and meaning only one thing: it is time for a new culminating in October 2016--PJALS will be Young celebrating its 40 th Activist anniversary in Leaders substance and style. Program We hope you (YALP) can all join us for our class! membership meeting As on September 10 th a YALP where we will honor graduate our volunteers; as it is from 2015 I you who have been sincerely responsible for PJALS urge remaining a strong everyone to voice in our join YALP. James, Victoria, Chris, Bri, Ryan, Teresa, Roupe, Trung, Kasey, community today. YALP was and Jamie — YALPistas of the class of 2015 So join us at instrumental in giving me the foundational the Community Building on Thurs Sept 10 skills of organizing and activism. The (Continued on page 7) connections with other youth cannot be understated. YALP is the only place I can find In This Issue Page where young minds can come and work together. Rusty Nelson: Losing WWII 3 Last year’s cohort was made up of Respect immigrants 4 members of the labor movement, the LGBT community, social work students from Eastern Death penalty at the tipping point 5 Washington University, multi-generational How many Presidential candidates have 8 (Continued on page 11) you moved? Peace and Justice Action League of Spokane Affiliate of the Fellowship of Reconciliation 35 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Found, Featured, Then Forgotten: U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War © 2011 by Mark D
    Found, Featured, then Forgotten Image created by Jack Miller. Courtesy of Vietnam Veterans Against the War. Found, Featured, then Forgotten U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War Mark D. Harmon Newfound Press THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE LIBRARIES, KNOXVILLE Found, Featured, then Forgotten: U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War © 2011 by Mark D. Harmon Digital version at www.newfoundpress.utk.edu/pubs/harmon Newfound Press is a digital imprint of the University of Tennessee Libraries. Its publications are available for non-commercial and educational uses, such as research, teaching and private study. The author has licensed the work under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/. For all other uses, contact: Newfound Press University of Tennessee Libraries 1015 Volunteer Boulevard Knoxville, TN 37996-1000 www.newfoundpress.utk.edu ISBN-13: 978-0-9797292-8-7 ISBN-10: 0-9797292-8-9 Harmon, Mark D., (Mark Desmond), 1957- Found, featured, then forgotten : U.S. network tv news and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War / Mark D. Harmon. Knoxville, Tenn. : Newfound Press, University of Tennessee Libraries, c2011. 191 p. : digital, PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. [159]-191). 1. Vietnam Veterans Against the War—Press coverage—United States. 2. Vietnam War, 1961-1975—Protest movements—United States—Press coverage. 3. Television broadcasting of news—United States—History—20th century. I. Title. HE8700.76.V54 H37 2011 Book design by Jayne White Rogers Cover design by Meagan Louise Maxwell Contents Preface .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution 2011.4.5
    Honor the Dead, Heal the Wounded, Stop the Wars ABOLISH NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Resolution 2011-4, to be approved at the National Convention of Veterans for Peace in Portland, Oregon, August 3-7, 2011. This resolution has already been approved by the East Bay and San Francisco Chapters. Whereas, the nuclear disaster at Fukushima has shown once again that nuclear power plants are, next to nuclear warheads themselves, among the most dangerous devices that our species has ever created, and that, along with nuclear weapons, the construction and proliferation of nuclear power is, as Patrick Moore states in Assault on Future Generations (1976), “the most irresponsible, in fact the most criminal act ever to have taken place on this planet,” and Whereas, as an educational and humanitarian organization dedicated to the abolishment of war and the elimination of nuclear weapons, Veterans for Peace understands the importance of linking nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons with the entire military industrial complex, the same destructive machine that gave us the wars in Vietnam and the Middle East, and Whereas, in addition to the serious health, safety, environmental, and economic issues involved with nuclear power plants, and the inherent risks of nuclear proliferation and terrorist attacks associated with nuclear power plants, the mulitple links between nuclear power and nuclear weapons make it impossible to abolish nuclear weapons as long as nuclear power plants continue to operate, and Whereas, control over fossil feuls and nuclear energy have been and continue to be a major focus of the wars that have plagued our species in the Twentieth and Twenty-first Centuries, and Whereas, there are alternative energy sources, such as wind and solar, that are safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterans and Military Families in the Anti-Iraq War Movement
    472 Armed Forces & Society 42(2) Because the critical variables, as we are informed, are military resistance to change and national policy maker attention and determination, what does it mean to say ‘‘peacekeeping’’ succeeded or failed? Is the link between peacekeeping and these supposed effects more correlative than causal? Admittedly these overlapping issues are largely semantic, but semantics can bedevil clarity and, as with this book, lessen the strength of one’s arguments, especially supposedly causal arguments. Finally, how exactly does democratization per se affect outcomes? How does it really fit in beyond the fact that many new peacekeepers were democratizing states? Is a polit- ical leadership’s desire, for instance, to undertake international signaling or to change its military organically linked to the democratization process? Would it make a difference if a mature democracy or an autocracy also resorted to peacekeep- ing deployments to further its prestige or change its military? This writer would ven- ture to say no. None of the issues raised above lessen this book’s heuristic value. Sotomayor per- forms a valuable service by looking at peacekeeping through civil–military and IR lenses. Decision makers need to mull his conclusions. So too should IR and civil– military relations theorists since Sotomayor points out the limits of their theories when exposed to peacekeeping practices. Lisa Leitz. (2014). Fighting for Peace: Veterans and Military Families in the Anti-Iraq War Movement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.312 pp. $22.95 (Paperback). ISBN978-0-8166-8046-7. Reviewed by: Dr. David Flores, U.S. Forest Service, Albuquerque, NM, USA DOI: 10.1177/0095327X15574257 A young man or woman joins the military.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterans for Peace News Minneapolis/St
    Spring 2016, volume XX, issue 1 VETERANS FOR PEACE NEWS MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL VETERANS FOR PEACE, CHAPTER 27 Veterans For Peace News is published quar- terly by Mpls./St. Paul Veterans For Peace, Chapter 27. Veterans For Peace works to increase awareness of the costs of war, restrain govern- ment from intervening in the internal affairs of other nations, end the arms race, reduce and eventually eliminate nuclear weapons, seek justice for veterans and victims of war, and abolish war as an instrument of national policy. We pledge to use demo- cratic and nonviolent means to achieve our purpose. To subscribe to this newsletter, Protesters in Jeju hold a peaceful demonstration against the Navy base in front of please call: 612-821-9141 police. Or write: Veterans For Peace Ch. 27 4200 Cedar Ave, S. #7 Local delegation protests US base in Jeju Minneapolis, MN 55407 by Barry Riesch feel the need to further arm itself with high- Or e-mail: [email protected] tech weaponry? ast December, I joined a 12-member dele- The delegation was organized by Bruce gation of VFP members in international Gagnon, who has been actively involved with Our website is: L www.vfpchapter27.org. solidarity with the people from Gangjong vil- Gangjong for several years, and Tarak Kauff, a lage on the island of Jeju with their ongoing national VFP board member. It was not heavi- Newsletter committee: Frank Fuller, editor; struggle to block a U.S. Navy base being built ly promoted to help prevent the possibility of Tom Dooley, Pat on their land.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposing the True Costs of War and Militarism Since 1985 VETERANSVETERANS FORFOR PEACEPEACE Organized Locally
    Exposing the True Costs of War and Militarism Since 1985 VETERANSVETERANS FORFOR PEACEPEACE Organized locally. Recognized Internationally. VFP NEWSLETTER veteransforpeace.org WINTER 2019 STAYING HUMAN: Deported Veterans provide aid to asylum seekers at the Tijuana border By Mike Tork how bad things get. Seguiré siendo humano. Meet your Deported Veterans Before I share what I saw What started out as a trip to learn firsthand what was regarding the asylum seek- happening on the border and help provide a little aid to asylum ers, I want to remind every- seekers ended up being much more. one that the veterans I met First and foremost, I would like to thank Hector Lopez, Lupita with in Tijuana are just that. Cibrian, Robert Vivar, Blanca Viramontes, and Jan Ruhman for They served their county not only welcoming me, but also helping me understand, and honorably, many in combat, see, what was happening along the Tijuana border. many highly decorated, but Lupita, Robert, and Blanca prepare What I saw was a very strong community of Deported Vet- were deported for mistakes sandwiches for asylum seekers. erans (Unified Deported Veterans/VFP Sgt. Barrios Memorial they made after being dis- Chapter 182) and supporters who unselfishly set aside their charged—mistakes like those made by so many fellow veterans own struggles to help asylum seekers. I also saw a community after returning home. Although others of us have been forgiven of veterans supporting each other through difficult times, shar- for our mistakes, they have not. They remain deported, sepa- ing what they can. It inspired me to remain human—no matter rated from family and friends, without the opportunity to make amends or move forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Sign on Letter
    Sign-on letter organized by the Climate Crisis and Militarism Working Group, Veterans For Peace Dear Honorable John Kerry: On behalf of Veterans For Peace and other peace and climate champions, we congratulate you on your appointment as Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, thank you for returning us to the Paris Agreement, and applaud your efforts to lead the Biden administration’s clean energy revolution. Let us put militarism at the center of this conversation on climate. We are pleased that the Biden/Harris Administration has created this position, as a reflection of the seriousness of the climate crisis, and we are pleased that the person with that position is you. It is approaching 50 years since you, as an anti-war veteran, delivered to Congress a lengthy, articulate and devastating critique of the Viet Nam war. Some of us were already anti-war veterans or soldiers, and you spoke truth to power for us. You have had many positions of power since that time; in your present position, we ask that you summon the courage and clarity about war and militarism that you expressed to Congress in April 1971. You posed the question, “How do we ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?” Now the question we pose is, “How do we ask millions of people to die as a result of a climate catastrophe fueled by endless war and militarism?” To thwart climate catastrophe, we present the following requests: 1) Please implement the inclusion of military emissions in all reporting and data on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pentagon and the Presidency 6/12/06 Page 1
    THE PENTAGON AND THE PRESIDENCY 6/12/06 PAGE 1 JOHN SHATTUCK: Good afternoon on this wonderful sunny afternoon on Columbia Point. One of the rare days. And we’re very honored that you would come inside on a day like this. I’m John Shattuck, the CEO of the Kennedy Library Foundation. And on behalf of myself and Deborah Leff, the Director of the Kennedy Library and Museum, I welcome you this evening to the last of our spring 2006 Kennedy Library Forums. I want to thank our lead sponsor, Bank of America, for making these forums possible, as well as our other sponsors for their generous support: Boston Capital, the Lowell Institute, the Corcoran Jennison Companies, and our media sponsors WBUR, which broadcasts all Kennedy Library Forums on Sunday evenings at 8:00, the Boston Globe , and our latest media sponsor, New England Cable News. On October 28 th , 1962, President Kennedy announced the end of the most dangerous crisis of his presidency. The Soviet Union had begun to remove the nuclear missiles it had secretly placed in Cuba. The U.S. naval blockade around Cuba had worked. Soviet President Nikita Khrushchev had backed down from his confrontation with the American president. The Cuban Missile Crisis was over. A nuclear holocaust had been averted. What was not known by many Americans at the time, but is now graphically clear from the documents and recordings displayed here in our Museum and at the Library, is that the world survived the Cuban Missile Crisis not only THE PENTAGON AND THE PRESIDENCY 6/12/06 PAGE 2 because Kennedy prevailed against Khrushchev, but also Kennedy prevailed against his generals -- his own generals in the Pentagon -- who had been urging him to conduct a preemptive nuclear attack on Cuba.
    [Show full text]