Bk Gandhi Peace Awards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bk Gandhi Peace Awards In Gandhi’s Footsteps: The Gandhi Peace Awards 1960-1996 by James Van Pelt for PROMOTING ENDURING PEACE 112 BEACH AVENUE • WOODMONT CT 06460 2 IN GANDHI’S FOOTSTEPS: THE GANDHI PEACE AWARDS Promoting Enduring Peace Gandhi Peace Award Recipients 1960-1996 Introduction Chapter Year Award Recipient Page 1 1960 Eleanor Roosevelt 1960 Edwin T. Dahlberg 2 1961 Maurice N. Eisendrath 1961 John Haynes Holmes 3 1962 Linus C. Pauling 1962 James Paul Warburg 4 1963 E. Stanley Jones 5 1965-66 A.J. Muste 6 1967 Norman Thomas 7 1967 William Sloane Coffin, Jr. 1967 Jerome Davis 8 1968 Benjamin Spock 9 1970 Wayne Morse 1970 Willard Uphaus 10 1971-72 U Thant 11 1973 Daniel Berrigan RE- SIGNED 12 1974-75 Dorothy Day 13 1975-76 Daniel Ellsberg 14 1977-78 Peter Benenson Martin Ennals 15 1979 Roland Bainton 16 1980 Helen Caldicott 17 1981 Corliss Lamont 18 1982 Randall Forsberg 19 1983-84 Robert Jay Lifton 20 1984 Kay Camp 21 1985-86 Bernard Lown 22 1986-87 John Somerville 23 1988-89 César Chávez 24 1989-90 Marian Wright Edelman 25 1991 George S. McGovern 26 1992 Ramsey Clark 27 1993 Lucius Walker, Jr. 28 1994 Roy Bourgeois 29 1995 Edith Ballantyne 30 1996 New Haven/León Sister City Project 31 1997 Howard & Alice Frazier Conclusion Note: A listing of dual years (e.g. 1988-89) indicates that the decision to present the Award to the recipient was made in one year, with the Award actually being presented the following year. 4 IN GANDHI’S FOOTSTEPS: THE GANDHI PEACE AWARDS Introduction he Gandhi Peace Award: it is a certificate, calligraphed with an inscription T summing up the work for peace of a distinguished citizen of the world. It is a medallion featuring the profile of Mohandas Kaharamchand Gandhi, with his words “Love Ever Suffers / Never Revenges Itself” cast in bronze. It is a name plate on a weighty carved statue of the Mahatma. It is a ceremony held approximately once a year, at which a distinguished peacemaker is recognized and given the opportunity to present a message of challenge and hope. It is to be awarded annually “for contribu- tions made in the promoting of internation- al peace and good will.” It has been received by the likes of El- eanor Roosevelt, Benjamin Spock, and César Chávez. Martin Luther King, Jr., was chosen but had to pass when he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace a few months later. Three other times the Nobel Committee seemed to follow P.E.P.’s lead, Mohandas K. “Mahatma” Gandhi choosing to bestow the Peace Prize on someone who just a few months before had won the Gandhi Peace Award: Linus Pau- ling, Peter Benenson, and Bernard Lown. Daniel Berrigan first accepted then angrily refused it. Pete Seeger politely declined, suggesting that P.E.P. give the Award to someone equally deserving but less thoroughly “awarded”. U Thant politely accepted, after having turned down the Nobel Peace Prize a few years before. ii IN GANDHI’S FOOTSTEPS: THE GANDHI PEACE AWARDS In preparing this account I have been struck by my own ignorance, despite decades of peace work, about many of the outstanding personages who have received the Award. Even those I had heard of I found I knew little about in terms of their specific accomplishments and their particular strategies for peacemaking. In checking around, I was flabbergasted to find that very many of my friends, intelligent and well-read, knew virtually nothing about most of the recipients. I know that there are biographies about many of them, but they are rarely read, at least in my encounters at the local libraries. There are some other surveys of peacemakers, such as Peter Rinaldo’s Trying to Change the World and Elizabeth Anne McGuinness’s People Waging Peace, which are somewhat arbitrary selections of leading activists from a variety of fields. This book is unique in being a survey of peacemakers selected not by me, but by peace activists contemporary with them, over the greater part of the history of the Cold War and beyond, representing an amazingly complete range of the varieties that peace activism has taken. In a sense it counters the usual TIME “Man of the Year” treatment of recent histor- ical personages, which so frequently ignores great peacemakers. (In the midst of the phe- nomenal Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign in 1982, TIME chose for its “Man of the Year” not Freeze originator Randall Forsberg but the personal computer!) Take a look at the schedule for the popular cable television network, The History Channel. What constitutes history? The schedule has the common answer: wars, bat- tles, weapons, soldiers, and wartime leaders compose at least three-quarters of the programs offered—a reasonable guide to the impression today’s television-oriented youth is gathering. But that is the “yang” of history, when humanity’s worst instincts drive us toward destruction. The “yin” without which history would be overwhelmed in conflagration is the untold story—the years of patient, thoughtful, unwavering struggles to “give peace a chance”. The stories that follow are the stories of the best of humanity—the people who, in a better world, would have our authority and trust. It is time we learn to recognize them, and perhaps as well to become them. James Van Pelt October 1996 Chapter One 1960: Beginning a P.E.P. Tradition— Eleanor Roosevelt & Edwin Dahlberg Like all of the perennial activities of Promoting Enduring Peace (P.E.P.), the Gan- dhi Peace Award was conceived by the organization’s founder, Jerome Davis, possi- bly as early as the late nineteen forties. At the Board of Directors meeting on March 13, 1959, he formally proposed that a yearly award be given to persons outstanding in their work for world peace. In his view, the recipient need not be a pacifist. Each recip- ient’s name would be inscribed on a permanent trophy and each would receive a cita- tion. The Board approved the idea. At the next meeting that year, on September 24, Board member Rabbi Eugene J. Lipman volunteered to secure a suitable trophy for what would be known as the Gan- dhi Peace Award, an offer that was accepted “with deep gratitude.” Dr. Davis, as Ex- ecutive Director, ordered a stock of one hundred heavy bronze medallions to be presented to the recipients. Dr. Davis was known to be an unusually parsimonious person, who would rather tear two sheets of paper together than consume a paper clip; the size of his medallion order expressed his faith in the continuity of his organization and the Award—and undoubtedly took advantage of quantity pricing. Rabbi Lipman commissioned a famous New York sculptor named Don Benaron— who later used his given name, Don Katz—to create a work of art to serve as the sym- bol of the Award. Mr. Katz researched Gandhi at the library of India House in New York City and by 1960 had carved a striking portrait of the founder of the century’s international movement for non-violent change. In 1985 he wrote, “I have been won- dering what became of the statue. I was delighted to learn that it was in good condi- tion and being used for a good cause. … I think the wood used is mahogany. I carved the Gujarati word for peace on one side, and on the other a symbolic plowshare and pruninghook—inspired by Isaiah 2:4”: They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. 2 IN GANDHI’S FOOTSTEPS: THE GANDHI PEACE AWARDS The Board nominated four well-known figures in connection with world peace: Dr. Edwin T. Dahlberg, Frederick Nolde, Eleanor Roosevelt, and James Paul War- burg. After some discussion, they selected the first two recipients of what was intended to be a new award of international significance: Eleanor Roosevelt and Edwin Dahl- berg. Both were residents of New York City, then the center of much of P.E.P.’s pub- lic activities, so their attendance at an awards presentation posed no problems of travel. It was the end of the Eisenhower era, a time when a forthright stand for interna- tional peace might mean a brand of disloyalty. The first presentation of the Award was scheduled to be made at the height of the Kennedy-Nixon Presidential campaign, which would define the onset of the new decade. The atmosphere would be charged with politics, with the sense of new possibilities attendant to the beginning of a new decade, and with the hope that the new President might be more representative of the liberal values shared by most of the individuals whose names were listed as the na- tional Board on the stationery of Promoting Enduring Peace. Eleanor Roosevelt The better-known of the two initial recipients of the Award was one of the most prominent liberal Democratic leaders of the century: Eleanor Roosevelt, niece of one President and wife of another. By 1960, two years before her death at age 78, Mrs. Roosevelt had accomplished far more than most men of any rank or time. Even before her marriage to Franklin in 1905 she had been a dynamic social activist. Prior to be- coming First Lady in 1932 she had raised five children, saved her husband from politi- cal oblivion after he was stricken with polio in 1921, continued her work for social bet- terment through numerous organizations, became a major influence in New York democratic politics, and served as Franklin’s Eleanor Roosevelt 1960 • ELEANOR ROOSEVELT & EDWIN DAHLBERG 3 very active partner during his terms as state assemblyman and Governor of New York.
Recommended publications
  • Complete Tape Subject
    1 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF Tape Subject Log (rev. Mar-02) Conversation No. 140-1 Date: August 14, 1972 Time: 7:55 pm Location: Camp David Study Table The Camp David operator talked with the President. Request for a call to John D. Ehrlichman -Ehrlichman’s location Conversation No. 140-2 Date: August 15, 1972 Time: Unknown between 8:43 pm and 9:30 pm Location: Camp David Study Table The President talked with the Camp David operator. [See Conversation No. 202-12] Request for a call to Julie Nixon Eisenhower Conversation No. 140-3 Date: August 15, 1972 Time: 9:30 pm - 9:35 pm Location: Camp David Study Table The President talked with Julie Nixon Eisenhower. [See Conversation No. 202-13] 2 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF Tape Subject Log (rev. Mar-02) ***************************************************************** BEGIN WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 1 [Personal returnable] [Duration: 4m 57s ] END WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 1 ***************************************************************** Conversation No. 140-4 Date: August 16, 1972 Time: Unknown between 8:15 am and 8:21 am Location: Camp David Study Table The President talked with the Camp David operator. [See Conversation No. 202-14] Request for a call to Alexander M. Haig, Jr. Conversation No. 140-5 Date: August 16, 1972 Time: 8:21 am - 8:29 am Location: Camp David Study Table The President talked with Alexander M. Haig, Jr. [See Conversation No. 202-15] Paul C. Warnke -George S. McGovern's statement -Possible briefing of Warnke -Security clearance process -Questions on Pentagon Papers 3 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF Tape Subject Log (rev. Mar-02) -The President’s instructions -Report by Richard M.
    [Show full text]
  • NAPF Report to UN Secretary General on Disarmament Education
    Report to UN Secretary-General on NAPF Disarmament Education Activities The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation (NAPF) has been educating people in the United States and around the world about the urgent need for the abolition of nuclear weapons since 1982. Based in Santa Barbara, California, the Foundation’s mission is to educate and advocate for peace and a world free of nuclear weapons, and to empower peace leaders. The following document was submitted to United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. It will make up a portion of the “Report of the Secretary-General to the 69th Session of the General Assembly on the Implementation of the Recommendations of the 2002 UN Study on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Education.” Websites www.wagingpeace.org NAPF’s primary website, www.wagingpeace.org, serves as an educational and advocacy tool for members of the public concerned about nuclear weapons issues. During this reporting period, there were over 700,000 unique visitors to this site. The Waging Peace site covers current nuclear weapons policy and other relevant issues of global security. It includes information about the Foundation’s activities and offers visitors the opportunity to participate in online advocacy and activism. The site additionally offers a unique archive section containing hundreds of articles and essays on issues ranging from nuclear weapons policy to international law and youth activism. The site is updated frequently. www.nuclearfiles.org The Foundation’s educational website, www.nuclearfiles.org, details a comprehensive history of the Nuclear Age. It is regularly updated and expanded. By providing background information, an extensive timeline, access to primary documents and analysis, this site is one of the preeminent online educational resources in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks
    32254 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS September 23, 19 7 6 before the Senate, I move, in accordance CONFffiMATIONS ject to the nominee's commitment to respond with the previous order, that the Senate to requests to appear and testify before any Executive nominations confirmed by duly constituted committee of the Senate. stand in adjournment until the hour of the Senate September 23, 1976: THE JUDICIARY 9 a.m. tomorrow. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND Howard G. Munson, of New York, to be The motion was agreed to; and at 8: 03 WELFARE U.S. district judge for the northern district p.m., the Senate adjourned until tomor­ Susan B. Gordon, of New Mexico, to be an of New York. Assistant Secretary of Health, Education, and Vincent L. Broderick, of New York to be row, Friday, September 24, 1976, at 9 Welfare. U.S. district judge for the southern dtstrict a.m. The above nomination was approved sub- of New York. EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS THE POLISH NATIONAL ALLIANCE Toastmaster, Felix Mika. attractive for advertisers to distribute their OF YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO Introduction of, Jack c. Hunter, Mayor, brochures unaddressed, as newspaper sup­ Youngstown, Ohio. • plements for instance, than to distribute Introduction of guests, Toastmaster. them separately to specific people or ad­ HON. CHARLES J. CARNEY Presentation of honoree, Mary C. Grabow­ dresses. OF 01!110 ski, Commissioner District 9, PNA. "Our members should be able to use pri­ Main speaker, Aloysius A. Mazewski, Presi­ vate delivery companies to deliver advertis­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES dent PNA. ing material just as can be done for maga­ Thursday, September 23, 1976 Presentation of deb't~tantes, Mary C.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Giving
    ANNUAL GIVING 2016-2017 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT GIVING IN REVIEW Dear Generous Benefactors, 2016 - 2017 It is my privilege to report on a few highlights of what your generosity enabled us to July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017 accomplish this year. The 2016-17 annual giving year saw a few records set and many enhancements to the educational experience of our Dons. The Loyola Fund Unrestricted & Designated $2,227,693 33% I continue to be humbled by the extraordinary generosity that you bestow upon the Endowed Scholarship Gifts $1,562,963 49% Loyola Blakefield community. Leading the way in support of our mission not only Capital Projects Support $523,444 The Annual Fund invests in the formation of our Dons, but inspires others to follow in your charitable 11% Blue & Gold Auction - Net Proceeds $386,718 Endowed Scholarships footsteps. 7% Capital Projects Support Let’s continue to partner with one another to create more opportunities for our Dons $4,700,818 Blue & Gold Auction to grow in their faith, conquer intellectual pursuits, and learn the value of serving others. With gratitude, ALUMNI GIVING Mr. Anthony I. Day P ’15, ’19vt month TOTAL GIFTS* President JUNE OF ALL ALUMNI 17.4% MADE A GIFT TOP 5 CLASSES $4.7 participation dollars raised million 1953 71% 1978 $352,140 1947 & 1954 42% 1982 $177,599 1949 & 1955 38% 1963 $158,580 RECORD 1960 35% 1964 $121,922 LOYOLA FUND 1952 & 1965 33% 1957 $107,515 $2.6 million BREAKING campaignFAMILY GIVING YEAR FY FY FACULTY, STAFF, AND BOARD THANK YOU TO ALL OF OUR 2016 48% 55% 2017 OF TRUSTEES GIVING DONORS AND VOLUNTEERS PERCENT PARTICIPATION BY CLASS PARTICIPATION CLASS OF 2017 43% CLASS OF 2021 62% * Every effort has been made to include all donors to Loyola Blakefield whose gifts were CLASS OF 2018 47% CLASS OF 2022 73% received between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Codepink: Women for Peace
    ACTIVIST ORGANIZATIONS AND STRATEGIC UTILIZATION OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES: AN EXPLORATION OF CODEPINK: WOMEN FOR PEACE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SCIENCES May 2019 By Wiebke Reile Dissertation Committee: Jenifer Sunrise Winter, Chairperson Vanessa Irvin Rich Gazan Rachel Neo Peter Leong, University Representative Keywords: Activism, Collective Action, Multi-modal Ethnography, Online Activism, Social Media, Social Movement Organizations ACTIVISM and ICTs © COPYRIGHT 2019 WIEBKE REILE All RIGHTS RESERVED ii ACTIVISM and ICTs Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my Mom and strong women like her. “I write for those women who do not speak, for those who do not have a voice because they were so terrified, because we are taught to respect fear more than ourselves. We've been taught that silence would save us, but it won't." - (Audre Lorde) iii ACTIVISM and ICTs Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the support from the amazing professors at the University of Hawai’i at Mānoa. I am especially indebted to Dr. Jenifer Winter, my dissertation chair, whose leadership and knowledge has made me the scholar I am today. She has had faith in me during every step of this process and I am eternally grateful. To the members of my committee thank you for your amazing input, sacrifice of time, and constructive support. In particular, I also want to thank Dr. Irvin for her invaluable knowledge, guidance, and support through all the years conducting research together at UH.
    [Show full text]
  • FAULTLINES the K.P.S
    FAULTLINES The K.P.S. Gill Journal of Conflict & Resolution Volume 26 FAULTLINES The K.P.S. Gill Journal of Conflict & Resolution Volume 26 edited by AJAI SAHNI Kautilya Books & THE INSTITUTE FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. © The Institute for Conflict Management, New Delhi November 2020 ISBN : 978-81-948233-1-5 Price: ` 250 Overseas: US$ 30 Printed by: Kautilya Books 309, Hari Sadan, 20, Ansari Road Daryaganj, New Delhi-110 002 Phone: 011 47534346, +91 99115 54346 Faultlines: the k.p.s. gill journal of conflict & resolution Edited by Ajai Sahni FAULTLINES - THE SERIES FAULTLINES focuses on various sources and aspects of existing and emerging conflict in the Indian subcontinent. Terrorism and low-intensity wars, communal, caste and other sectarian strife, political violence, organised crime, policing, the criminal justice system and human rights constitute the central focus of the Journal. FAULTLINES is published each quarter by the INSTITUTE FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT. PUBLISHER & EDITOR Dr. Ajai Sahni ASSISTANT EDITOR Dr. Sanchita Bhattacharya EDITORIAL CONSULTANTS Prof. George Jacob Vijendra Singh Jafa Chandan Mitra The views expressed in FAULTLINES are those of the authors, and not necessarily of the INSTITUTE FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT. FAULTLINES seeks to provide a forum for the widest possible spectrum of research and opinion on South Asian conflicts. Contents Foreword i 1. Digitised Hate: Online Radicalisation in Pakistan & Afghanistan: Implications for India 1 ─ Peter Chalk 2.
    [Show full text]
  • John Foster Dulles and the Federal Council Of
    JOHN FOSTER DULLES AND THE FEDERAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES, 1937-1949 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Albert N. Keim, B.A., M.A. ******* The Ohio State University 1971 Approved by Adviser Department of History ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to Dr. Constant H. Jacquet, Jr., Director of the Research Library of the National Council of Churches, for giving me access to the National Council of Churches Archives. I am grateful for the assistance rendered by Mrs. Wanda M. Randall, Assistant to the Curator of Manuscripts, during my research in the Dulles Papers at Princeton University Library. Dr. Georgia Harkness, Dr. Roswell P. Barnes, and Dr. Samuel McCrea Cavert all provided valuable advice at various stages of the project. My adviser, Dr. Robert H. Bremner, gave unfailing counsel at every stage of the work, I owe a special debt to my wife, Leanna, who loyally supported the project from beginning to end. VITA October 31, 1935 Born - Uniontown, Ohio 1963 ........... B.A., Eastern Mennonite College, Harrisonburg, Virginia 1965 M.A., University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 1965-1969 Instructor, Eastern Mennonite College, Harrisonburg, Virginia 1969-1970 Teaching Associate, Department of History, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1970-1971 Dissertation Year Fellow, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Social History of the United States Since 1900. Professor Robert H. Bremner Political History of the United States Since 1900. Professor K. Austin Kerr Political and Social History of the United States, 1850-1900.
    [Show full text]
  • Planes Were Leaving the Scene of Their Destruction, a with the Rise of Hitler
    BY JAMES A . K E H L ON SUNDAY,DECEMBER 7, 1941, AS THE BOMBS The America First Committee was the last fell at Pearl Harbor, some 2,500 Pittsburghers were gasp of a national isolationist movement that had taking their seats at Soldiers and Sailors Memorial begun after World War I.Disillusioned with fallout Hall in the city's Oakland district, where a rally from treaties signed at Versailles to end WWI, the sponsored by the America First Committee (AFC) was American public demanded that the nation take a scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. Fifteen minutes before hard-line attitude of non-alliance with other i the program, at about the time the last Japanese countries. That posture, which became U.S. policy, planes were leaving the scene of their destruction, a was maintained without significant challenge into journalist informed the rally's organizers that Japan the mid-1930s. had attacked Hawaii and the Philippines. With the rise of Hitler, Mussolini, and Japanese America First organizers, hoping to discourage warlords, however, many Americans and U.S. pol- ' public support for U.S. involvement in the war al- icymakers began to question the wisdom of ready raging in Europe, would later say that they continued isolationism. High officials in the believed the report was a hoax. That's why, or- Roosevelt administration considered a non-inter- ganizers insisted, they elected to proceed with the ventionist stance imprudent. By 1941, the issue was a event. Whatever the truth, those gathered in the hall hot topic, with organizations on both sides of the became an unusual captive audience for the next two debate actively seeking support in Congress and and a half hours: as speaker after speaker demanded among the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: the Rise of the Antinuclear Power Movement: 1957 to 1989
    Chapter 3 THE RISE OF THE ANTINUCLEAR POWER MOVEMENT 1957 TO 1989 In this chapter I trace the development and circulation of antinuclear struggles of the last 40 years. What we will see is a pattern of new sectors of the class (e.g., women, native Americans, and Labor) joining the movement over the course of that long cycle of struggles. Those new sectors would remain autonomous, which would clearly place the movement within the autonomist Marxist model. Furthermore, it is precisely the widening of the class composition that has made the antinuclear movement the most successful social movement of the 1970s and 1980s. Although that widening has been impressive, as we will see in chapter 5, it did not go far enough, leaving out certain sectors of the class. Since its beginnings in the 1950s, opposition to the civilian nuclear power program has gone through three distinct phases of one cycle of struggles.(1) Phase 1 —1957 to 1967— was a period marked by sporadic opposition to specific nuclear plants. Phase 2 —1968 to 1975— was a period marked by a concern for the environmental impact of nuclear power plants, which led to a critique of all aspects of nuclear power. Moreover, the legal and the political systems were widely used to achieve demands. And Phase 3 —1977 to the present— has been a period marked by the use of direct action and civil disobedience by protesters whose goals have been to shut down all nuclear power plants. 3.1 The First Phase of the Struggles: 1957 to 1967 Opposition to nuclear energy first emerged shortly after the atomic bomb was built.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Guide (PDF)
    AMERICANS AND THE HOLOCAUST TEACHER GUIDE ISOLATION OR INTERVENTION? A CASE STUDY ON THE LEND-LEASE ACT ushmm.org/americans AMERICANS AND THE HOLOCAUST ISOLATION OR INTERVENTION? A CASE STUDY ON THE LEND-LEASE ACT OVERVIEW In this lesson, students will identify multiple economic, social, and geopolitical factors that influenced Americans’ attitudes about the United States’ role in the world from 1939–1941, when people in the United States were deeply divided about what actions, if any, America should take in defense of countries threatened by German military conquest. Through an examination of primary source documents, students will identify and evaluate arguments that different Americans made for the provision of military materiel to Britain in 1940. Ultimately, students will reflect on questions that this lesson raises about America’s role in the world today. This lesson explores the following question: n How did Americans interpret their role in the world when facing the threat of war? HISTORY KEY QUESTIONS EXPLORED 1. From 1939–1941, what information was available to Americans about German military expansion and the German threat to European countries? 2. What events and conditions had an impact upon Americans’ attitudes about German military expansion and whether the United States should supply military materiel to Great Britain? 3. How did Americans respond to the proposal that the United States provide military aid to Great Britain in defense against German attacks? HISTORY LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. Students will understand that there were many different issues that the American public perceived as having a critical impact on their livelihoods, security, and core values.
    [Show full text]
  • How Early Post Office Policy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 58 | Issue 4 Article 1 1-2007 The rT ansformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Officeolic P y Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine Anuj C. Desai Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Anuj C. Desai, The Transformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Officeo P licy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine, 58 Hastings L.J. 671 (2007). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol58/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles The Transformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Office Policy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine ANUJ C. DESAI* INTRODUCTION One of the great urban legends on the Internet was "Bill 6o2P."' In the late 199OS it spread like wildfire, and it occasionally makes the rounds again like pleas from Nigerian officials seeking help with their Swiss bank accounts or the story of the $250 Neiman Marcus cookie recipe. The bill, supported by (no doubt soon-to-be-defeated) "Congressman Tony Schnell," would have imposed a five cent tax on each e-mail message. One would be hard put to imagine a more nefarious way for * Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School. Many people read all or large parts of this Article and provided helpful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present
    From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Thomson, Jennifer Christine. 2013. From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945- Present. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11125030 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present A dissertation presented by Jennifer Christine Thomson to The Department of the History of Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History of Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2013 @ 2013 Jennifer Christine Thomson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Charles Rosenberg Jennifer Christine Thomson From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present Abstract This dissertation joins the history of science and medicine with environmental history to explore the language of health in environmental politics. Today, in government policy briefs and mission statements of environmental non-profits, newspaper editorials and activist journals, claims about the health of the planet and its human and non-human inhabitants abound. Yet despite this rhetorical ubiquity, modern environmental politics are ideologically and organizationally fractured along the themes of whose health is at stake and how that health should be protected.
    [Show full text]