DOCSLIB.ORG

Times Mirror Square Project Final Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Times Mirror Square Project Final Environmental Impact Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Times Mirror Square Project Final Environmental Impact Report Page Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1. Purpose of the Final EIR ............................................................................................... 1-1 2. Project Summary ........................................................................................................... 1-1 3. Overview of the CEQA Public Review Process for the Draft EIR ................................. 1-2 4. Organization of Final EIR .............................................................................................. 1-5 Chapter 2: Responses to Comments ........................................................................................... 2-1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2. Responses to Comments .............................................................................................. 2-5 Chapter 3: Revisions, Clarifications, and Corrections .............................................................. 3-1 Chapter 4: Mitigation Monitoring Program ................................................................................. 4-1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 4-1 2. Organization .................................................................................................................. 4-1 3. Administrative Procedures and Enforcement ............................................................... 4-2 4. Program Modification .................................................................................................... 4-3 5. Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, and Implementation ........................... 4-3 Appendices A: Original Comment Letters B: AB 52 Conclusion of Consultation Letter C: Discussion fo Modifications to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines Tables 2-1 Comments Received in Response to the Draft EIR...................................................... 2-2 Times Mirror Square Project City of Los Angeles Final Environmental Impact Report September 2019 i Chapter 1 Introduction 1. Purpose of the Final EIR The City of Los Angeles (City), as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has prepared this Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Times Mirror Square Project (Project). This document, in conjunction with the Draft EIR, comprise the Final EIR. As described in Sections 15088, 15089, 15090 and 15132 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Lead Agency must evaluate comments received on the Draft EIR and prepare written responses and consider the information contained in a Final EIR before approving a project. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15132, a Final EIR consists of: (a) the Draft EIR or a revision of the Draft; (b) comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR either verbatim or in summary; (c) a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR; (d) the responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process; and (e) any other information added by the Lead Agency. Accordingly, the Final EIR for the Project comprises two parts as follows: • Part 1: Draft EIR and Technical Appendices – Volume 1: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Chapters I through VIII) – Volume 2: Draft Environmental Impact Report – Appendices A through P • Part 2: Final EIR and Technical Appendices – Volume 3: Final Environmental Impact Report (Chapters 1 through 4) and Appendices A and B 2. Project Summary The Times Mirror Square Project (Project) proposes to preserve and rehabilitate the Times, Plant, and Mirror Buildings and demolish the Executive Building and parking structure for construction of the new North and South Towers. The Project’s North and South Towers would be constructed over a 5-story Podium and, from street grade, the North Tower would rise 37 stories or approximately 495 feet above grade. The South Tower would rise 53 stories or approximately 665 feet above grade. The North Tower would contain 450 residential units and the Times Mirror Square Project City of Los Angeles Final Environmental Impact Report September 2019 1-1 1. Introduction South Tower would contain 677 residential units, for a total of 1,127 residential units. A proposed Paseo would separate the existing Times, Plant, and Mirror Buildings from the new towers and intersect the Project Site between the W. 1st Street and W. 2nd Street sidewalks. The three buildings to be retained, which have a total existing floor area of approximately 376,105 square feet, currently include office and cafeteria uses, and are aligned along S. Spring Street, with frontages along both W. 1st Street and W. 2nd Street. Under the Project, there would be a total of 1,127 residential units, approximately 307,288 square feet of commercial office uses, approximately 18,817 square feet of commercial restaurant uses, and an approximately 50,000 square-foot grocery store. The three retained and rehabilitated historic buildings would be separated from the west side of the block by the Paseo. The Draft EIR concluded that the Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts on: (1) Project and cumulative air quality during construction; (2) historic resources from the removal of the Executive Building and parking structure; (3) Project and cumulative construction noise and vibration impacts; (4) and traffic impacts at one intersection under the Existing with Project scenario (Intersection No. 11) and at six intersections under the Future with Project scenario (Intersection Nos. 1, 5, 10, 11, 12, and 17). 3. Overview of the CEQA Public Review Process for the Draft EIR In compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines, the City as the Lead Agency for the Project, has provided opportunities for the public to participate in the environmental review process. As described below, throughout the environmental review process, an effort was made to inform, contact and solicit input from the public and various Federal, State, regional, and local government agencies and other interested parties on the Project. a) Initial Study/Notice of Preparation At the onset of the environmental review process and pursuant to the provisions of Section 15082 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) to State, regional, and local agencies, and members of the public for a 32-day review period, commencing June 30, 2017 and ending July 31, 2017. The purpose of the NOP was to formally convey that the City was preparing a Draft EIR for the proposed Project, and to solicit input regarding the scope and content of the environmental information to be included in the Draft EIR. See Appendix A-1, Notice of Preparation, and Appendix A-2, Initial Study, to the Draft EIR (Volume 2). Times Mirror Square Project City of Los Angeles Final Environmental Impact Report September 2019 1-2 1. Introduction The NOP included notification that a public scoping meeting would be held on July 25, 2017, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. in the Ronald F. Deaton Civic Auditorium of the Los Angeles Police Department Police Administrative Building located at 100 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. The meeting was held in an open house or workshop format and provided interested individuals, groups, and public agencies the opportunity to view materials, ask questions, and provide oral and written comments to the City regarding the scope and focus of the Draft EIR as described in the NOP and Initial Study. The presentation materials and other documentation from the scoping meeting are provided in Appendix A-3, Scoping Meeting Materials, to the Draft EIR (Volume 2). Written comment letters responding to the NOP were submitted to the City by public agencies and interested individuals and organizations. Comment letters were received from eight public agencies: (1) California Native American Heritage Commission; (2) California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research; (3) Department of Toxic Substances Control; (4) General Services Administration (on behalf of the United States Government [Courthouse]); (5) Los Angeles County Law Library; (6) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro); (6) Los Angeles Sanitation; (7) Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG); (8) South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). An additional three written comments were provided by organizations and/or individuals via mail, e-mail, or submittal at the NOP Scoping Meeting. Three attendees at the Scoping Meeting filled out a sign-in sheet and/or shared oral comments. Copies of the written comments are provided in Appendix A-4, NOP and Scoping Meeting Comments, to the Draft EIR (Volume 2). b) Draft Environmental Impact Report In accordance with the provision of Sections 15085(a) and 15087(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City, serving as the Lead Agency: (1) published a Notice of Completion and Availability (NOCA) of a Draft EIR and posted the notice with the Los Angeles County Clerk, indicating that the Draft EIR was available for review at the City‘s Planning Department (Environmental Analysis Section, 221 N. Figueroa Street, Room 1350, Los Angeles, CA 90012); (2) provided copies of the NOCA and Draft EIR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan JUNE 2015 Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan (FY 2016 – FY 2025)
    ten-year bus fleet management plan JUNE 2015 Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan (FY 2016 – FY 2025) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 TRANSIT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................... 6 1.1 TRANSIT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE TYPES ........................................................................................... 7 1.3 BUS SERVICE TYPE & LINE IDENTIFICATION......................................................................... 14 1.4 PROGRAMMED TRANSIT PROJECTS..................................................................................... 16 1.5 TRANSIT ACCESS PASS (TAP)................................................................................................ 31 1.6 ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ATMS)........................................ 31 2.0 VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 33 2.1 GENERAL FLEET STATISTICS ................................................................................................. 33 2.2 SPARE RATIO ........................................................................................................................ 35 2.3 CONTINGENCY FLEET ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Other CEQA Considerations VI
    VI. Other CEQA Considerations VI. Other CEQA Considerations 1. Significant and Unavoidable Impacts Section 15126.2(b) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR describe any significant impacts which cannot be avoided. Specifically, Section 15126.2(b) states: Describe any significant impacts, including those which can be mitigated but not reduced to a level of insignificance. Where there are impacts that cannot be alleviated without imposing an alternative design, their implications and the reasons why the project is being proposed, notwithstanding their effect, should be described. As evaluated in Section IV, Environmental Impact Analysis, of this Draft EIR, and summarized below, implementation of the Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to on-site construction noise, on- and off-site construction vibration (related to human annoyance), and intersection levels of service during Project operation.1 Cumulative impacts with respect to on- and off-site construction noise and off-site construction vibration (related to human annoyance) would also be significant and unavoidable.2 All other impacts associated with the Project would be less than significant or reduced to a less-than-significant level with mitigation. 1 The Project’s on-site construction noise impact and on-site construction vibration impact (with respect to human annoyance) would only be significant and unavoidable if Related Project No. 121 (Times Mirror Square project) is completed and occupied before or during Project construction. 2 Cumulative on-site construction noise impacts would only be significant and unavoidable if construction of Related Project No. 121 (Times Mirror Square project) occurs concurrently with Project construction.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIPOD a P~Relations Plan Lesley Moran CM441 December 13, 1999
    TRIPOD A P~Relations Plan !, ' Lesley Moran CM441 - December 13, 1999 I • • ((/ !_;/ } Client: TRIPOD 1727 West Burbank Boulevard Burbank, CA 91506 Phone (818) 972-2080 Fax (818) 972-2090 Client Background: TRIPOD is a private, non-profit educational research organization committed to helping families raise their deaf and hard-of-hearing children in a supportive environment. Mission: TRIPOD's mission is to demonstrate a cost-effective educational model in which deaf and hard-of-hearing children are co-enrolled with their hearing peers so all can realize their full academic potential. • History: The TRIPOD organization has evolved through several different stages~In 1983, TRIPOD founder Megan Williams was researching educational opportunities for her profoundly deaf son Jacob and found them completely sub-par to hearing schools. By raising $150,000 in funding and recruiting deaf education s~ecialis!s, it began as a private pre-school with four children .an ,three years late formed a partnership with a small private elementary school (Stage I). + In 1989, TRIPOD entered into a partnership with the Burbank Unified School District (Stage II). + In 1993, this public/private partnership evolved into a regional program serving four school di~tricts within the Special Education Local Plan Agencies (SELP A) (Stage III). + These efforts have been successful because ofTRIPOD's active role in private fundraising activities. The program is now officially known as the Foothill & Pasadena SELPAs/TRIPOD program for deaf and hard-of-hearing children. It is housed at four sites within the Burbank Unified School District. Nature of Services: Education: Tripod offers an effective combination of programs and services to children and families affected by hearing loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Orange Line
    Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida CCOOVVEERR PPHHOTOOTO LLooss AAnnggeelleess CCoouunnttyy MMeettrrooppololiittanan TTransransppoorrttaattioionn AAuutthhoorriittyy DDIISCSCLLAAIIMMEERR TThhiis ds dooccuumemennt it is is inntteennddeed ad as a ts teecchhnniiccaal al assssiissttaanncce pe prroodduucctt. I. It it is dsiiss ssdeemmiinnaatteed udnn ddueer tr thhe sepp oosnnssoorrsshhiip opf tf tohhe Ue..SS U.. DDeeppaarrttmemennt ot of Tf Trraannssppoorrttaattiioon in in tn thhe ie inntteerreesst ot of if innffoorrmamattiioon enxxcc ehhaannggee. T. Thhe Uenn iittUeed Sdttaa Sttees Gsoo vvGeerrnnmemennt atss ssauumemes nso nlo liiaabbiilliittyy ffoor ir itts cs coonntteenntts os or ur usse te thheerreeooff. T. Thhe Ue Unniitteed Sd Sttaattees Gs Goovveerrnnmemennt dtoo eeds nsoo tn et ennddoorrsse perroo pdduucctts osf mfo aa nnmuuffaaccttuurreerrss. T. Trraadde oerr o mamannuuffaaccttuurreerrss’ n’ naamemes as appppeeaar her herreeiin sn soolleelly by beeccaauusse te thheey ayrre a ceoo nncssiiddeerreed edssss eeennttiiaal tl to tohh et oebb jjeeoccttiivve oef tf tohhiis rs reeppoorrtt.. Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, FL 33620 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Skechers Performance Los Angeles Marathon Media Guide
    2016 Skechers Performance Los Angeles Marathon Media Guide Important Media Information 3 Race Week Schedule 4 About the Race 7 8 Legacy Runners The Course 10 History 25 Logistics 32 On Course Entertainment 37 Media Coverage 43 LA BIG 5K 44 Professional Field 46 Race Records 52 Charities 67 Partners & Sponsors 72 Marathon Staff 78 2017 Skechers Performance Los Angeles Marathon Media Guide Media Contacts Carsten Preisz Jolene Abbott VP, Brand Strategy and Marketing Executive Director, Public Relations Conqur Endurance Group Skechers Performance 805.218.7612 310.318.3100 [email protected] [email protected] Molly Biddiscombe Kerry Hendry Account Supervisor Vice President Ketchum Sports & Entertainment Ketchum Sports & Entertainment 860-539-2492 404-275-0090 [email protected] [email protected] Finish Line Media Center Media Credential Pickup Fairmont Hotel LA Convention Center Wedgewood Ballroom West Hall, Room 510 101 Wilshire Blvd 1201 S. Figueroa Street Santa Monica, CA Los Angeles, CA 90015 310-899-4136 Friday, March 17: 10:30 am – 5 pm Saturday, March 18: 9 am – 2 pm Press Conference Schedule Fairmont Hotel Friday, Wedgewood Ballroom 8:00 am Sunday 6:00 am to 3:00 pm ‘Meet the Elites’ Event, Griffith Park Top athletes, Conqur CEO Tracey Russell Social 11:00 am Pages Website: www.lamarathon.com Pre-race Press Conference, LA Convention Center, West Hall, Room510 www.goconqur.com Top athletes Facebook: facebook.com/LAmarathon Instagram: @lamarathon Sunday, Twitter: @lamarathon 10:00 am Snapchat: @lamarathon
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Access Pass (Tap) & Rail Fare Gate Status
    Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 213.922.9200 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.9201 Fax rnetro.net 41 REVISED OPERATIONS COMMITTEE APRIL 16,2009 SUBJECT: TRANSIT ACCESS PASS (TAP) & RAIL FARE GATE STATUS ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file report on the Transit Access Pass (TAP) and Rail Fare Gate Status ISSUE TAP staff was directed to provide a regular status update of project milestones and deployment activities on the Transit Access Pass (TAP@)regional smart card. Also, with the inception of the Metro Rail Fare Gate project, staff was directed to report monthly on the progress of this project. This report serves to fulfd these requests. DISCUSSION There has been significant progress on TAP regional implementation: Municipal Operators - Culver CityBus and Santa Clarita Transit have successfully migrated their UFS systems with full TAP capabilities. Norwalk successfully installed UFS fareboxes with TAP capability on April 3. Foothill, Gardena, and Montebello are in the process of conversion between May and June, 2009. Reduced Fare TAP - Over 60,000 Senior, Disabled, and College/Vocational TAP cards have been produced and mailed to applicants. Day Pass - TAP cards, equipment, and supplies delivered to divisions for scheduled day pass conversion to TAP on March 15. At the point of writing this Board report, the conversion process has gone fairly uneventfully with the exception of card volumes requiring replenishment at bus divisions since customer education and training to re-cycle cards on subsequent usage needs further reinforcement. Metro Pass Sales Outlets - compact point of sales devices have been installed at over 400 pass sales outlets and additional devices are currently being installed at Cities and Senior Centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Range Transportation Plan FY 2015 - 2017
    Short Range Transportation Plan FY 2015 - 2017 City of Montebello Transportation Department City of Montebello – Transportation Department FY 2015 - 2017 SHORT RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Table of Contents SECTION 1 – OVERVIEW OF THE TRANSIT SYSTEM 1.1 History of the City of Montebello and Montebello Bus Lines ................................ 3 1.2 Governance and Organizational Structure ............................................................. 4 1.3 Transit Services and Areas Served .......................................................................... 5 1.4 Ridership ................................................................................................................. 7 1.5 Fare Structure ......................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Fleet, Facility and Equipment ................................................................................. 8 SECTION 2 – BUDGET, FUNDING, AND REGULATION 2.1 Operating and Capital Budget............................................................................... 10 2.2 Funding Sources.................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Regulatory Requirements ..................................................................................... 11 SECTION 3 – ACCOMPLISHMENTS, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 3.1 Past Accomplishments........................................................................................... 13 3.2 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposals for Operation of Union
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR OPERATION OF UNION STATION, VAN NUYS, AND ORANGE LINE FLYAWAY BUS SERVICE Release Date: November 20, 2014 Pre-Proposal Conference: December 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time Los Angeles World Airports Administration West Building 7301 World Way West, Room 420 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Deadline for Submission of Questions/Requests for Clarification: Submit all questions and requests for clarification in writing to [email protected] no later than 3 p.m. Pacific Time on December 10, 2014 Proposal Due Date: January 22, 2015 no later than 3 p.m. Pacific Time at: Commercial Development Attn: Christine Kalamaros 6053 W. Century Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90045 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................... 3 A. THE OPPORTUNITY .............................................................................. 3 SECTION 2 – BACKGROUND INFORMATION .......................................................... 4 A. LAWA ..................................................................................................... 4 B. DESCRIPTION OF LAX ......................................................................... 4 C. DESCRIPTION OF FLYAWAY FACILITIES ........................................... 4 D. FLEET .................................................................................................... 5 E. FARES ................................................................................................... 5 F. CURRENT SERVICE LEVELS ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Torrance Bus Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies
    TORRANCE BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master In Urban and Regional Planning By Jose M. Perez 2019 i SIGNATURE PAGE PROJECT: TORRANCE BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES AUTHOR: Jose M. Perez DATE SUBMITTED: Spring 2019 Department of Urban and Regional Planning Dr. Alvaro M. Huerta Project Committee Chair Professor of Urban Planning Richard Zimmer Committee Member Lecturer of Urban Planning David Mach Senior Transportation Planner Torrance Transit i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author thanks the Torrance Transit Employees for the data they furnished and their participation in the client project, especially Senior Transportation Planner David Mach. The author would also like to thank the City of Torrance for providing information on future development and specific goals of their circulation plan. Special thanks to Dr. Alvaro M. Huerta and Professor Richard Zimmer for their help and guidance in completing the client project. i ABSTRACT A city’s transportation infrastructure directly affects the mobility of the people, goods, and services, of all who live within its’ limits. Bus transit lines are a key element of a balanced transportation system that can improve or detract from the quality of life of its’ populous. Transit networks that are poorly implemented eventually become impractical and difficult to maintain; and thus, a burden upon the city it’s meant to help. In addition the service reliability of a transit line is critical to both the transit agency and its users in order to maintain a healthy transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Bike Share Implementation Plan
    Regional Bike Share Implementation FOR LOS ANGELES Plan COUNTY PREPARED BY PREPARED FOR 600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.261.3050 April 22, 2015 [This page intentionally blank] TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 Business Plan .............................................................................................. 8 Vision ............................................................................................................................ 9 System Overview ...................................................................................................13 Capital Ownership .................................................................................................14 Operations Model .................................................................................................14 Fare Structure..........................................................................................................14 TAP Integration ......................................................................................................19 Mobility Hubs Coordination .............................................................................23 Equity .........................................................................................................................25 Operations Funding..............................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Operations Committee J U L Y 2 6 , 2 0
    SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE JULY 26, 2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY ROSTER SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE COUNTY MEMBER San Bernardino: Paul Eaton (Chair) 1 vote Mayor, City of Montclair Larry McCallon Mayor, City of Highland Riverside: Karen Spiegel (Vice Chair) 1 vote Mayor, City of Corona Andrew Kotyuk Councilmember, City of San Jacinto Orange: Shawn Nelson 1 vote Supervisor, 4th District County of Orange Los Angeles: Richard Katz 1 vote Metro Appointee Don Knabe Supervisor, 4th District County of Los Angeles Robert T. Bartlett Metro Appointee Tom Lackey Mayor Pro Tem, City of Palmdale Ventura: Brian Humphrey 1 vote Commission Member VCTC One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE FRIDAY, JULY 26, 2013 10:00 A.M. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY UNION STATION CONFERENCE ROOM ONE GATEWAY PLAZA, 3RD FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 AGENDA DESCRIPTIONS The agenda descriptions are intended to give notice to members of the public and a brief general description of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The posting of the recommended actions does not indicate what action will be taken. The Committee may take any action that it deems appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the notice of the recommended action. The Chair reserves the right to discuss the items listed on the agenda in any order. A person with a disability may contact the Committee Secretary's office at (213) 452-0219 or via e-mail [email protected] at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to request receipt of an agenda in an alternative format or to request disability-related accommodations, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • 157067NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. • THE BADGE AND THE PEN: A LOVE-HATE RELATiONSHIP POLICE MEDIA RELATIONS BY THE YEAR 2005 157067 • U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opInions stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necess.anly represent the official pOSition or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been gr'e~1!I?'fornia COmr:'ission on Peace Offlcer Standards and ~alnln~' to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner. By Anthony W. Batts long Beach Police Department May 1995 20-0402 The Badge and the Pen: A Love-Hate Relationship • Police Media Relations by the Year 2005 A. Batts. Sponsorjng Agenc~: California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. 1995. 163 pp. Availability: Commission on POST, Center for Leadership Development, 1601 Alhambra Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95816-7053. Single copies free; Order Number 20-0402 National Institute of Justice/NCJRS Microfiche pro;ram, Box 6000, Rockville, MD 20850. Microfiche fee. Microfiche Number NCJ I 10 b 2 . ABSTRACT • The future of law enforcement media relations is examined to provide strategic alternatives for future improvement. A future study of the skills and abilities in media relations that will be required of law enforcement in the year 2005. A model strategic plan is presented to assist in the development of those skills and abilities.
    [Show full text]