DOCSLIB.ORG

8. from Camelot to Watergate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
8. from Camelot to Watergate 8. From Camelot to Watergate 8.1 The Triumphs and Turmoil of the 1960’s 8.2 Post Industrial America: Nixon to Carter 8.3 Conservatism Revived, 1980 - 1992 8.4 New Millennium, 1992 - Present 8.1 The Triumphs and Turmoil of the 1960's 8.1.1 JFK and Civil Rights 8.1.2 Nonviolent Radicals and Violent Conservatives 8.1.3 New Frontiers and Old Rivals 8.1.4 Reaching for the Stars 8.1.5 "President Kennedy Has Been Shot” 8.1.6 The Great Society 8.1.7 The Longest War 8.1.8 The Culture of Protest 8.1.1 JFK and Civil Rights 1960 • Sit-ins in Greensboro • Four Black college students sit at the Woolworth lunch counter • Denied service • Sparks a decade of public activism • John F. Kennedy elected President • “The torch has been passed to a new generation…” • Top priority: Cold War • “Best and brightest” worked on foreign policy Marching for Freedom • Students spearhead the movement • 1960: Woolworth sit-in • 1960: Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee • 1961: Freedom Ride • Congress of Racial Equality members purchased tickets for a 1,500 mile trip from Washington D.C. to New Orleans • Racially mixed group of 13 • One bus firebombed • One bus attacked by White mob Freedom Ride: May, 1961 • Anniston, Alabama: White mob burns bus carrying interracial group of Freedom Riders. JFK & Civil Rights • JFK: generally sympathetic, but not deeply committed to civil rights • Segregation hurt U.S. image worldwide • Feared loss of Southern vote in Congress • Appointed 5 segregationist federal judges • Allowed J Edgar Hoover to harass MLK and other civil rights leaders • Grassroots activists and violence forced JFK’s hand • 1962: 500 U.S. marshals protect James Meredith, first African American student at U. Mississippi 8.1.2 Nonviolent Radicals & Violent Conservatives Dr. King Plays “Chicken” • Birmingham • MLK and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference planned 1963 campaign in Birmingham • Project C = confrontation • King wanted nonviolence to provoke hatred and violence • April 1963: Hundreds arrested • King put children on the front lines • Some as young as 6 • Police used water cannons • Kennedy forced a settlement • Southern whites caved under pressure Hosing Down Civil Rights Demonstrators Birmingham, Alabama: 1963 “Segregation Now, Segregation Forever” • Alabama Governor • Promises to “bar the schoolhouse door” to prevent desegregation at U. Alabama • Kennedy commits federal power to guarantee racial justice • June, 1963: “Our nation’s promise of democracy must be made now…’ • Hours later, Medgar Evers is killed in his driveway • Days later, JFK asks Congress to pass a civil rights bill “We Shall Overcome!” • March on Washington • August 28, 1963: 250,000 meet at Washington Mall to support Civil Rights Bill • Freedom Summer • Summer, 1964: more than 1,000 White students join Mississippi voter mobilization project • Freedom Schools: taught literacy and constitutional rights • June 21: James Chaney, Michael Schwerner, Andrew Goodman murdered Dr. King’s “I Have a Dream” Speech “When the architects of our great republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Selma March: 1965 • Civil rights demonstrators march from Selma to the state capital at Montgomery. • This Life magazine cover shows that the civil rights movement had found a national audience. • Moments after the photo was taken, state troopers beat marchers with billy clubs. • Soon thereafter, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Malcolm X • The charismatic black leader called for black separatism. • Malcolm later tempered his separatist rhetoric. 8.1.3 New Frontiers & Old Rivals Camelot • 1959-60 Campaign and Early Years • “New Frontier” • Federal government will eradicate poverty, guarantee health care, and improve education • Will put a man on space • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) begins Apollo program • 1962: John Glenn orbited earth Nation-building in the Third World • Kennedy vs. Khrushchev • Khrushchev endorsed “wars of national liberation” • JFK called for “peaceful revolution” • Took steps to help nations’ through early growth • Oversaw a multibillion-dollar alliance for progress (Peace Corps) • 1961 Summit meeting is disastrous • JFK and Khrushchev disagree on ‘preconditions for peace’ The Berlin Wall • The wall separating East and West Berlin is a hated symbol of the division of Europe into democratic and communist camps. • November, 1961: East German soldiers stand guard as the concrete wall is constructed Tensions Mount • Bay of Pigs Invasion • Eisenhower left a partial plan to invade Cuba and overthrow Castro • CIA-trained rebels would conduct amphibious attack • April 17, 1961: complete fiasco • Anti-American sentiment throughout Latin America Cuban Missile Crisis • 1962: Soviets secretly deploy nuclear missiles in Cuba • U-2 spy planes gather evidence • Kennedy orders naval quarantine of Cuba • October 22: Kennedy addresses the nation and demands Soviet • October 28: compromise is arranged • U.S. will not invade • U.S. will remove Jupiter missiles from Turkey • Soviets will withdraw from Cuba 8.1.4 Reaching for the Stars To the Moon This moon’s-eye-view of the earth greeted the first men to land on the lunar surface. “One Giant Leap for Mankind” • Astronaut Edwin (“Buzz”) Aldrin descends from the Lunar Landing Craft. • Crewmate Neil Armstrong: “That’s one small step for man; one giant leap for mankind.” 8.1.5 "President Kennedy Has Been Shot." 1963 Congressional campaign • Civil Rights tops domestic agenda • JFK goes to Dallas • Assassinated November 22, 1963 8.1.6 The Great Society Johnson’s Great Society • Great Society • Johnson imagines an America of abundance and liberty for all • Civil Rights: top priority • Signed Civil Rights Act of 1964 • Ends legal discrimination • War on Poverty • Economic Opportunity Act • Office of Economic Opportunity • Job Corps • Legal Services for the Poor President Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973) • Johnson presidency shattered by trauma of Vietnam. • • 1968, so unpopular he was heckled everywhere he went. Giving Thanks for Medicare April 1965: An elderly woman shows her gratitude to President Lyndon B. Johnson for signing the Medicare bill Poverty in the United States, 1960–2006 • 1963-68: Great Society programs & poverty rate • 2000: the poverty rate fell to 11.3 percent • Lowest level since 1979. • Poverty threshold: tied to the consumer price index. • Poverty rate: the percentage of all Americans living below that threshold. 8.1.7 The Longest War Vietnam Conflict • Johnson inherited hostilities in Vietnam • Kennedy had sent 1600 “advisors” • LBJ: Tonkin Gulf Incident and Resolution expanded American involvement exponentially • U.S. destroyers “under attack” by North Vietnamese boats • Gulf of Tonkin Resolution gave Johnson full authority to repeal attacks • “Non-declaration” of war: Congress surrendered its war making powers to Johnson • Escalation: U.S. commits increasing ground forces “Spineless” • The United States supports South Vietnam. Vietnam Conflict II • American Soldiers in Vietnam • Faced an enemy’s guerilla tactics • Americanization: U.S. vs. communism • Vietcong soldiers were “wearing us down, driving us mad, killing us.” • War became a stalemate • Public Sentiment • Dropped steadily during the war • Because of use of weapons like Agent Orange and napalm • Specific incidents: My Lai Masssacre, Tet Offensive 1968 • The nation seemed to be coming apart • Americans frustrated over Vietnam, racial violence • Tet Offensive • January 31, 1968 (Vietnamese New Year) • North Vietnamese struck several cities at once South Vietnam • American public wondered if war was winnable Vietnam and Southeast Asia, 1954–1975 • Le Ly Hayslip’s memoir, When Heaven and Earth Changed Places, describes the trauma endured by ordinary Vietnamese as a result of America’s fight against the Viet Cong: “In 1963—the year the Viet Cong came to my village— American warplanes bombed Man Quang. It was at noon, just when the children were getting out of school. My aunt Thu and her pregnant daughter-in-law were making lunch for her husband and four grandchildren when the air-raid signal blared… High Tech War • + Modern equipment (e.g., the helicopter) gave the Americans a military advantage. • - Lack of political purpose and a national will to win Vietnam Vets Protest the War, 1971 • Public opinion turned against the war. 1965: 15% of Americans favored withdrawal of U.S. troops • 1969: 69% considered the war a “mistake” • 1970: 52% supported withdrawal • April, 1971: eight hundred veterans threw away their Purple Hearts, Bronze Stars, Silver Stars, and other military honors to protest a war they no longer support. President Lyndon Johnson Haunted by Specters of Vietnam, 1967 8.1.8 The Culture of Protest The Free Speech Movement Berkeley, California, 1964 • The Free Speech Movement University of California-Berkeley was the first large- scale student mobilization • Became common throughout the 1960s. • Here a student trained in passive resistance is dragged by police to a “paddy wagon”. The Siege of Chicago: 1968 • August 1968: thousands of antiwar protestors demonstrates at the Democratic National Convention • Police & National Guard violently broke up peaceful “festival of light” by 2,500 members of the Youth International Party (Yippies)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whitlam and China
    WHITLAM AND CHINA Prime Ministers Series November 2014 FRONT COVER IMAGE: Gough and Margaret Whitlam visit the Temple of Heaven in Beijing November, 1973. © File photo/NLA/Xinhua CONTENTS Introduction 4 Whitlam and China: 6 Transcript of Panel Discussion, Sydney, November 6 2014 A Note from Graham Freudenberg - Terrill and Taiwan (November 9 2014) 35 Whitlam Timeline 38 Further Reading 40 The Panellists 42 Published by Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI) University of Technology, Sydney PO Box 123 Broadway NSW 2007 Australia t: +61 2 9514 8593 f: +61 2 9514 2189 e: [email protected] w: www.acri.uts.edu.au © Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI) 2015 ISBN 978-0-9942825-0-7 The publication is copyright. Other than for uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without attribution. INTRODUCTION ACRI is proud to have hosted this discussion of Gough Whitlam’s 1971 visit which opened up the contemporary relationship between Australia and China. It is sad that we weren’t able to interview Gough Whitlam about China in the way we intend to interview other Australian Prime Ministers. But we are honoured to add this transcript to the many tributes to Australia’s 21st Prime Minister. In our panel conversation, a long-term Whitlam advisor and friend, 81 year old Graham Freudenberg, recreated the tension around the visit. Mr Whitlam was Opposition Leader; he was taking a political risk in going to ‘Red China’. Mr Freudenberg, a master of story- telling, captured the sense of excitement felt by the Whitlam party encamped at the Peking Hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Communication Arts and Sciences THE LONG TWILIGHT STRUGGLE: PRESIDENTIAL RHETORIC AND NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE COLD WAR, 1945-1974 A Dissertation in Communication Arts and Sciences by Sara Ann Mehltretter Drury © 2011 Sara Ann Mehltretter Drury Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2011 The dissertation of Sara Ann Mehltretter Drury was reviewed and approved* by the following: J. Michael Hogan Liberal Arts Research Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Jeremy Engels Assistant Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences J. Philip Jenkins Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Humanities Department of History and Religious Studies Thomas W. Benson Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Rhetoric Head of Department of Communication Arts and Sciences *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This study explores the discourse of U.S. presidents as they defined and redefined the concept of “national security” during the Cold War. As commander-in- chief and the most visible spokesman for the United States in world affairs, the president has enormous power to shape understandings of national security strategy and foreign policy. The project consists of a series of four case studies in presidential speech making on national security: Harry S. Truman’s “Truman Doctrine” speech; Dwight Eisenhower’s “Age of Peril” radio address; John F. Kennedy’s “Inaugural Address”; and the speeches of Richard Nixon during his February 1972 trip to the People’s Republic of China. I argue that each of these episodes marked a significant moment in the rhetoric of national security, as each president promoted a new understanding of the nature of the threats to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold War Guided Viewing Unit.Pdf
    ©Reading Through History Excerpt from The Cold War by Jake Henderson & Robert Marshall ©2012 To this videos series, click one of the links below!: Reading Through History on YouTube: The Cold War Reading Through History: The Cold War ©Reading Through History Name________________________ Communism: Guided Viewing: Fill in the blanks below to create complete sentences. 1. For many years, communism was the dominant economic system used in many countries across __________________________ and Asia. 2. The modern idea of communism was first proposed by German philosophers __________________________ and Friedrich Engels. 3. Together, they wrote a short book known as The Communist _______________. 4. One of the key principles of communism is the concept of a _____________________ society. 5. More importantly, the salaries of employees, regardless of the job performed, were all _____________________________. 6. The eventual goal of this 'classless society' would be a state in which there was no _____________________ at all. 7. In a true communist nation, there is to be no private ownership of _______________________. 8. This would also mean that the state controlled all means of producing __________________________. 9. Finally, in 1917, a group of Communists in Russia, known as _______________________, started a revolution. 10. At one point during what came to be known as the Cold War era, a full ___________ of the world’s population lived under some type of communist rule. ©Reading Through History Page 1 Name________________________ The Soviet Union: Guided Viewing: Fill in the blanks below to create complete sentences. 1. During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union were the world's only two “___________________________”.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon's Communications Strategy After Lam Son
    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons War and Society (MA) Theses Dissertations and Theses Winter 12-9-2019 Stop Talking about Sorrow: Nixon’s Communications Strategy after Lam Son 719 Dominic K. So Chapman University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/war_and_society_theses Part of the Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation So, Dominic K. Stop Talking about Sorrow: Nixon’s Communications Strategy after Lam Son 719. 2019. Chapman University, MA Thesis. Chapman University Digital Commons, https://doi.org/10.36837/ chapman.000102 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in War and Society (MA) Theses by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stop Talking about Sorrow: Nixon’s Communications Strategy after Lam Son 719 A Thesis by Dominic K. So Chapman University Orange, CA Wilkinson College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in War and Society Studies December 2019 Committee in charge: Gregory Daddis, Ph.D., Chair Lori Cox Han, Ph.D. Robert Slayton, Ph.D. The thesis of Dominic K. So is approved dis, Ph.D., Chair Lori Cox Han, Slayton, Ph.D December 2019 Stop Talking about Sorrow: Nixon’s Communications Strategy after Lam Son 719 Copyright © 2019 by Dominic K. So III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, thank you to my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SYLLABUS the Modern US Presidency
    SYLLABUS The Modern U.S. Presidency – Fifty Years of Political Evolution BLHV-461-01 Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Studies Program, Georgetown University, Spring 2014 Day and Time: Mondays – 5:20 p.m. to 7:50 p.m. Location: TBA Instructor: Ambassador Paul A. Russo Adjunct Professor of Liberal Studies Telephone: (202) 256-3467 E-Mail: [email protected] The syllabus is subject to change. Course Summary This course will present an overview of the American political process, with focus on the executive branch of the U.S. Government, comparing and contrasting the role and style of modern presidents and their decision- making process in dealing with crisis situations – from John F. Kennedy to Barack Obama --with emphasis on foreign policy decisions. We will also consider the changing role of the U.S. President at the beginning of the 21st Century, specifically discussing the impact of terrorism, two wars, and the financial crisis, on the governing process. The course offers an insider’s perspective on how major events shape both foreign and domestic White House policy. We will examine America’s new role in a rapidly changing world, with emphasis on how the White House is affected by modern technology, the 24-hour news cycle, and globalization. The course will also scrutinize the functions of key White House staff and their expanding role in the governing process, and consider the mechanics and the politics of staffing over 3,500 senior federal positions, including the U.S. Senate confirmation process. Students are expected to keep abreast of current affairs, and also to read historical materials on modern U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide
    1970–1979 Lesson 8 LESSON 8 The Decade of 1970–1979 LESSON ASSIGNMENTS You are encouraged to be very attentive while viewing the video program. Review the video objectives and be prepared to record possible answers, in abbreviated form, as you view the video. The topics and time periods may differ from the chapters of the textbook your school system is using. Each video program chronicles a wide array of events and personalities during a specific decade of the 20th century. Keep in mind that one of the overarching goals of each lesson is to help you understand how past historical events and actions by historical personalities did not occur in a vacuum, and that they are inextricably interwoven in your society today. Video: “The Decade of 1970–1979” from the series, The Remarkable 20th Century. Activities: Your teacher may assign one or more activities for each lesson. OVERVIEW The decade of the 1970s saw the end of the Vietnam War, the death of Elvis Presley and the revelation of Watergate and the birth of the microprocessor, or “the computer on a chip.” Videocassette recorders changed home entertainment forever. The sites of DNA production on genes were discovered, and the fledgling research in genetic engineering was temporarily halted pending further development of safer techniques. Three presidents (Nixon, Ford, and Carter) tried to provide leadership for the nation as it marched towards advances for women, civil rights, the environment, and space exploration. Many of the “radical” ideas of the 1960s reached fruition in the 1970s and were mainstreamed into American life and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Nixon-China and Trump-Korea Policies* D
    2018 ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА Т. 11. Вып. 4 МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ UDC 324 Permanent сampaigning as an issue for foreign policy analysis: A comparison of Nixon-China and Trump-Korea policies* D. A. Lanko, I. S. Lantsova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation For citation: Lanko D. A., Lantsova I. S. Permanent campaigning as an issue for foreign policy analysis: A comparison of Nixon-China and Trump-Korea policies. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Inter- national Relations, 2018, vol. 11, issue 4, pp. 404–414. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.406 The article seeks to extend the limits of applicability of permanent campaigning as a concept helpful in understanding politics in the field of foreign policy analysis. It should start with ex- ploring how applicable the saying “it took Nixon to go to China” is not only to foreign policy analysis, but also to the studies of public and even business administration. In early 1970s Nixon’s reputation of a tough anti-Communist helped him win domestic support to his policy towards Communist China. In a similar manner, in 2017 Trump sought a reputation of a fierce critic of North Korea, by means of publicly threatening the latter with ‘fire and fury’, in order to not only convince North Korea’s Kim to make concessions, but also to gain domestic support to possible change in U.S.-North Korean relations. The Trump-Korea situation differed significantly from the Nixon-China situation, which limited Trump’s ability to win domestic support to possible rapprochement with North Korea by means of permanent campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI WORKING PAPERS Access European Open Author(S)
    Repository. Research Institute University European Institute. Cadmus, EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE EUI WORKINGEUI PAPERS on University Access European Open Author(s). Available The 2020. © in Library EUI the by produced version Digitised Repository. Research Institute University European European University Institute 3 Institute. 0001 Cadmus, on 0036 University 3926 Access European 9 Open Author(s). Available The 2020. © in Library EUI the by produced version Digitised Repository. Research Institute University European Institute. Cadmus, on University Access Ross: EUI Working Paper RSC No. 99/4 European Open “BeyondLeft andRight": The New 'Partisan' Politics of Welfare Author(s). Available The 2020. © in Library EUI the by WP 3 0 9 EUR produced version Digitised Repository. Research Institute University European Institute. directed by Professors Maurizio Ferrera (Universities of Pavia and Bocconi, Milano) and This Working Paper has been written in the context of the 1998-1999 European Forum European European welfare states; a broad, Adopting long-term comparative and the perspective, will aim to: Forum Rhodes Martin (Robert Schuman Centre). programme on sub-national sub-national and supra-national level; scrutinize the ■ complex web of social, economic and political challenges to contemporary • and, more generally, outline broad the and scenarios change. trajectories of • discuss the • role of the various actors in promoting or hindering this reform at the the national, various optionsidentify and constraints for, on institutional reform; - Cadmus, on University Access Recasting Recasting the European Welfare State: Options, Constraints, Actors, European Open Author(s). Available The 2020. © in Library EUI the by produced version Digitised Repository. Research Institute University European Institute. Cadmus, EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE on BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO (FI) University The New Access Jean Monnet Fellow, European Forum Forum (1998-99) Jean European Monnet Fellow, EUI EUI Working EUFPaper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank God for That
    Rich Pliskin Washington, DC [email protected] richpliskin.com 202-549-1453 THANK GOD FOR THAT A novel by Rich Pliskin 84,000 words THANK GOD FOR THAT/1 OUR BRAND IS OUR BUTTER Denny Dash worked fast. He ripped the pencil drawer from his office desk and poured the debris of a once-glittering marketing career into a Felcher Communications Corp. travel tote: one leaky tube of 3-2-1 BlistOff lip balm, some loose change from no- count countries, a sample baggy of Quendle’s CheeseChumps, and a handful of Horvath for President buttons: “I Think Not,” “Thank God for That,” “Enough With the Slogans Already!” and the emotive core of the campaign: “In Your Heart, You Know He’s Wrong. But So What?” And the crumpled envelope with the key in it. The one thing he was looking for. It had been a week since CEO Harold Felcher, Denny’s ostensible boss, had thrust the key on him. Denny had been fingering through restive correspondence from the New York State Family Court when Harold padded in, waving the envelope over his head like Chamberlain bringing home the Munich Agreement. Had Chamberlain been a hundred pounds heavier, wheezed often and been unable to keep his shirttail tucked in, the resemblance would have been uncanny. Goering was a closer match. THANK GOD FOR THAT/2 Harold had correctly judged that Denny Dash, FC2’s erstwhile creative engine, had hurtled off the rails and plunged into a very deep, weed-choked mental gully that nothing less than an open-ended tropical sabbatical could hoist him out of.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Human Rights Policy in the Post-Cold War Era
    Bryant University Bryant Digital Repository History and Social Sciences Faculty Journal History and Social Sciences Faculty Articles Publications and Research Summer 2006 U.S. Human Rights Policy in the Post-Cold War Era John W. Dietrich Bryant University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/histss_jou Recommended Citation Dietrich, John W., "U.S. Human Rights Policy in the Post-Cold War Era" (2006). History and Social Sciences Faculty Journal Articles. Paper 78. https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/histss_jou/78 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History and Social Sciences Faculty Publications and Research at Bryant Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in History and Social Sciences Faculty Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Bryant Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. U.S. Human Rights Policy in the Post-Cold War Era: Continued Structural Constraints Across Time and Administrations John W. Dietrich Bryant University 1 Historically, the implementation of U.S. human rights policy has been a case of “two steps forward, one step back.” From its earliest days, the United States has attempted, at least to some degree, to include morality, the protection of individual rights, and the spread of democracy in foreign policy calculations. These efforts became more prominent after World War II. By the late-1980s, human rights concerns were firmly embedded in U.S. foreign policy rhetoric, policy-making institutions, and global actions. Despite these long-term trends, full policy implementation of human rights principles was constrained over time by lack of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Revolt: a Former Law-And-Order Conservative Takes a Lead on Criminal-Justice Reform
    June 29, 2015 Issue Prison Revolt: A former law-and-order conservative takes a lead on criminal-justice reform. By Bill Keller Patrick J. Nolan’s own experience led him to challenge decades of conservative policy. Illustration by Stanley Chow n the mid-nineteen-eighties, shortly after the convictions of six members of the House of Representatives and one senator in the IF.B.I. bribery sting code-named Abscam, one of the bureau’s anticorruption units turned its attention to the California legislature, where an informant had reported that lawmakers were on the take. Agents posing as representatives of a shrimp-processing company announced plans to build a plant near Sacramento, provided that a state-loan guarantee could be procured. They offered to reward legislators who would help secure their financing. The operation, inevitably, was known as Shrimpscam. Patrick J. Nolan, an earnest law-and-order conservative representing Glendale and Burbank, was the leader of the Republican minority in the assembly. He had already voted for a bill making the company eligible for the guarantee, but Governor George Deukmejian, who was aware of the sting, had vetoed it. Now one of the agents wanted to meet Nolan to entice him to intercede with Deukmejian. On June 29, 1988, Nolan and a legislative aide, Karin Watson, arrived at a bugged suite in the Sacramento Hyatt Regency, across from the Capitol. They declined the agent’s offer of champagne (it was not yet noon) in favor of Diet Pepsi, admired the view, engaged in some awkward small talk, and left twenty minutes later, with two five-thousand-dollar checks.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 U.S. Foreign Policy in Transition
    U.S. Foreign Policy 9 in Transition Is the United States relinquishing its global supremacy?distribute By Bill Wanlund or AP Photo/Jim Mone At an annual security conference of the United States’ European Michael Petefish stands inside a soybean bin at his allies in February, a gathering that normally celebrates trans-Atlantic farm near Claremont, Minn., in July 2018. When unity, German Chancellor Angela Merkel delivered a harsh assess- President Trump imposed $250 billion in tariffs on mentpost, of U.S. foreign policy. Chinese exports, China responded with its own Merkel criticized the Trump administration’s unilateral tariffs. The trade war, which has cooled, has hurt approach to international affairs, specifically questioning U.S. some U.S. farmers. China is the largest buyer of American soybeans. plans to pull troops out of Syria and Afghanistan and a decision to abandon the 31-year-old intermediate-range nuclear weapons treaty with Russia. Both actions, she said, would endanger Europe while strengthening Moscow’s position. copy, The liberal world order—the U.S.-led system of institutions and alliances created after World War II and credited with establishing postwar global peace and prosperity—“has collapsed into many tiny parts,” Merkel said.1 not Attendees gave the German leader a standing ovation, in contrast to the cool reception that met Vice President Mike Pence hours later when he extended greetings from Trump. In that speech, Pence defended the administration’s foreign policy, saying that under Do President Trump, “America is leading the free world once again.” From CQ Researcher, Pence also urged Europeans to “do more” in their own defense and March 29, 2019 “stop undermining” U.S.
    [Show full text]