Addendum C Addendum C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Addendum C Addendum C ADDENDUM C (DOD CONTRACTORS) Total Purchases: $377,545,789,635 Parent Rank Total DoD Air Force Army Navy Company Lockheed 1 $30,051,930,697 $13,402,513,986 $4,673,579,372 $9,994,571,537 Martin Corp. Northrop 2 23,493,816,066 5,479,989,076 6,716,656,907 10,105,473,396 Grumman Corp. 3 Boeing Co. 23,337,676,385 7,794,047,338 5,731,974,349 7,748,677,940 4 BAE Systems 16,280,496,923 828,059,801 10,089,734,594 4,804,129,315 General 5 14,438,355,290 1,214,774,012 6,405,315,050 6,483,123,733 Dynamics Corp. 6 Raytheon Co. 14,219,207,207 2,253,498,433 5,355,002,065 5,065,679,797 United 7 8,300,866,917 1,523,796,618 4,688,709,458 1,815,768,432 Technologies L-3 8 6,708,092,019 2,351,444,344 2,609,680,934 1,002,989,257 Communication 9 KBR Inc. 5,997,147,425 0 5,967,705,203 21,562,825 Navistar 10 4,755,920,575 0 1,050,487,191 3,661,537,716 International 11 ITT Corp. 4,361,701,072 792,240,270 2,216,449,782 1,171,466,504 12 Textron Inc. 4,229,341,007 82,694,889 1,877,358,208 2,118,188,994 13 SAIC 3,880,995,968 554,684,641 1,426,224,359 952,845,596 General Electric 14 3,575,099,286 861,623,778 693,192,932 1,554,292,506 Co. Computer 15 3,460,070,189 1,051,526,975 1,297,668,833 632,433,336 Sciences Corp. 16 Carlyle Group 3,000,639,282 926,994,813 1,489,905,528 431,919,072 17 Humana Inc. 2,952,008,623 12,773,329 13,847,565 0 18 URS Corp. 2,554,214,043 678,565,777 1,511,131,563 340,533,854 19 Health Net Inc. 2,438,349,117 0 7,738,759 0 Triwest 20 2,366,975,634 3,374,709 3,337,141 0 Healthcare ADDENDUM C (Page 1) ADDENDUM C (DOD CONTRACTORS) 21 Renco Corp. 2,357,606,472 0 2,246,977,265 882,547 MacAndrews & Forbes 22 2,357,595,977 0 2,246,966,770 882,547 Holdings Inc. 23 Finmeccanica Group 2,287,550,122 345,506,669 1,676,254,285 166,167,303 24 Public Warehousing Co. KSC 2,150,460,246 0 112,874,687 389,839 25 Hewlett-Packard Co. 1,936,483,484 121,716,498 126,362,722 1,500,647,274 26 Alliant Techsystems Inc. 1,928,045,694 158,596,859 1,545,629,367 214,725,180 27 Bechtel Group Inc. 1,909,722,670 0 362,461,903 1,444,569,802 28 Oshkosh Truck Corp. 1,863,726,822 2,855,688 1,139,848,061 594,806,836 29 Harris Corp. 1,841,470,263 352,496,050 700,433,176 562,796,290 30 BP PLC 1,733,031,788 0 12,479,006 1,335,395 31 Honeywell Inc. 1,722,292,898 422,553,331 917,429,432 226,105,722 32 Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. 1,712,005,958 140,491 87,944 25,050 Hensel Phelps Construction 33 1,385,774,293 0 1,018,601,994 194,751,134 Co. 34 Force Protection Inc. 1,360,427,189 0 26,597,104 1,260,999,475 35 CACI International Inc. 1,324,237,903 30,197,348 855,709,364 360,343,915 36 AmerisourceBergen Corp. 1,298,059,841 83,165 260,875 308,840 37 Rockwell Collins 1,290,859,084 773,085,946 126,795,606 311,722,654 38 Shaw Group Inc. 1,162,267,243 58,373,675 1,026,977,507 71,565,167 39 Veritas Capital Inc. 1,088,769,197 32,061,649 886,391,895 50,837,576 40 General Motors Corp. 1,076,904,574 382,648 1,070,195,213 1,535,050 General Atomics Technology 41 1,074,419,407 579,075,188 356,240,344 122,811,088 Corp. 42 Red Star Enterprises Ltd. 1,069,266,941 0 0 0 ADDENDUM C (Page 2) ADDENDUM C (DOD CONTRACTORS) Jacobs Engineering 43 1,061,047,715 417,139,704 474,687,169 85,603,024 Group Inc. 44 Valero Energy Corp. 1,043,869,551 0 73,781 0 45 Bahrain National Oil Co. 1,017,687,603 0 0 27,711 Abu Dhabi National Oil 46 918,256,500 0 0 0 Co. 47 VSE Corp. 910,970,473 1,056,359 770,453,773 139,410,182 48 McKesson Corp. 903,799,326 33,821 3,410,799 165,198 49 Hawker Beechcraft Corp. 873,897,910 823,896,324 150,034 49,663,703 50 Cardinal Health Inc. 856,333,988 1,840,754 5,512,460 3,853,811 Rank Parent Company Total DoD Air Force Army Navy 51 Dell Computer Corp. $853,009,785 $163,188,072 $446,435,698 $137,002,507 52 Exxon Mobil Corp. 836,548,150 0 75,400 0 53 Aerospace Corp. 768,870,625 768,870,624 0 0 54 MITRE Corp. 753,883,279 315,806,923 438,076,355 0 55 Government of Canada 744,892,235 82,814,809 581,150,504 46,126,090 56 Johns Hopkins University 737,152,343 25,557,031 15,509,329 439,160,972 57 Motor Oil Hellas 724,853,533 0 0 0 Cerberus Capital 58 699,109,260 272,059,710 321,739,234 101,642,955 Management LLC Massachusetts Institute 59 690,979,858 674,214,136 12,723,729 1,766,348 of Technology ManTech International 60 655,579,972 39,750,939 468,587,925 98,302,417 Corp. 61 Supreme Foodservice AG 647,167,103 0 16,824 0 62 Afognak Native Corp. 625,338,159 33,423,988 380,906,675 209,173,786 CH2M Hill Companies 63 590,556,845 272,852,190 233,347,979 84,304,529 Ltd. 64 Rolls Royce PLC 575,055,274 146,721,853 34,043,302 314,030,420 ADDENDUM C (Page 3) ADDENDUM C (DOD CONTRACTORS) 65 Chugach Alaska Corp. 571,049,687 218,447,009 229,500,924 116,923,859 66 Qinetiq Ltd. 544,400,680 22,884,216 295,907,687 156,542,210 67 AECOM Technology Corp. 542,021,197 8,898,669 512,354,481 20,824,644 68 Kongsberg Gruppen ASA 533,417,559 0 519,926,428 7,506,433 69 Clark Enterprises 528,766,858 0 347,436,052 181,330,806 70 Serco Group PLC 523,436,321 117,542,491 250,349,830 154,853,577 71 FLIR Systems Inc. 507,944,847 2,573,732 381,111,835 112,829,953 72 Battelle Memorial Institute 507,253,506 209,188,912 229,049,887 55,835,539 73 Goodrich Corp. 488,566,461 142,087,471 201,966,041 60,550,693 74 Thales Group 475,384,785 24,028,412 182,573,107 206,505,951 75 Tetra Tech Inc. 472,960,770 79,441,485 216,306,216 143,792,111 76 Walsh Group Ltd. 457,810,954 0 381,642,295 76,168,658 77 Balfour Beatty PLC 457,806,604 0 278,568,912 179,237,691 78 Caddell Construction Co. 457,368,091 0 343,711,022 113,657,069 79 International Oil Trading Co. LLC 456,802,653 0 0 0 80 IBM Corp. 438,442,797 32,868,218 139,590,963 135,836,638 81 Perini Corp. 436,363,793 51,409,576 384,954,216 0 82 Atlantic Diving Supply Inc. 435,784,112 10,085,160 190,810,107 11,073,010 83 Fluor Corp. 430,878,065 18,128,045 370,364,360 42,385,659 84 Sierra Nevada Corp. 429,752,561 251,287,811 150,015,314 28,433,902 85 Ceradyne Inc. 417,616,849 0 334,254,377 6,998,076 86 EOD Technology Inc. 406,322,993 0 395,983,226 10,339,766 87 Syracuse Research Corp. 403,733,239 39,350,693 357,559,755 6,822,790 88 Government of Germany 403,511,351 0 403,511,351 0 ADDENDUM C (Page 4) ADDENDUM C (DOD CONTRACTORS) 89 NANA Regional Corp. Inc. 395,526,436 69,496,405 205,891,169 40,818,802 90 Peter Kiewit Sons Inc. 388,739,591 0 340,275,640 48,463,950 91 M.A. Mortenson Cos. 379,601,040 0 353,277,196 26,323,843 92 Environmental Chemical Corp. 372,745,944 211,092,012 145,243,918 16,410,013 93 AT&T Inc. 371,277,191 29,467,353 137,598,235 58,063,591 94 Kraft Foods Inc. 367,840,952 0 0 0 95 Daimler AG 366,016,800 912,666 345,360,235 14,140,454 96 Owens & Minor Inc. 365,861,498 0 0 0 97 Parsons Corp. 356,746,280 27,084,791 296,981,887 30,601,531 98 Cubic Corp. 354,715,998 63,585,514 226,409,732 58,450,192 99 ChevronTexaco Corp. 349,576,353 0 4,268,538 653,480 100 McCann-Erickson Worldwide Inc. 348,696,704 0 348,696,703 0 Rank Parent Company Total DoD Air Force Army Navy ADDENDUM C (Page 5) .
Recommended publications
  • Hospitals Hungry Under Health Reform
    20120924-NEWS--0001-NAT-CCI-CD_-- 9/21/2012 6:41 PM Page 1 ® www.crainsdetroit.com Vol. 28, No. 40 SEPTEMBER 24 – 30, 2012 $2 a copy; $59 a year ©Entire contents copyright 2012 by Crain Communications Inc. All rights reserved Page 3 Bills aim to African violence Hospitals hungry under touches auto supply chain flow funds health to sewer Electronics retailer unplugs Michigan search reform projects Inside New loan, grant Tom Henderson on how Systems prowl not to save Belle Isle, for acquisitions programs sought Page 4 BY CHAD HALCOM BY AMY LANE Crain’s Lists CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS SPECIAL TO CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS The need for efficiency under Communities may get some help Largest IT companies, health care reform may be lead- JEFF JOHNSTON/CDB from Lansing in managing and im- ing to a wave of consolidation and proving one of the most critical largest architectural firms, the possible entry of more for- people covered by Medicaid and and costly pieces of their infra- Pages 18, 19 profit health care companies into those newly insured in 2014. structure — their aging sewer sys- Michigan. Other changes under reform in- tems. Crain’s reported Sept. 16 that clude hospitals working with On the move in the Legislature This Just In Beaumont Health System has been physicians and other providers to are bills that would take about $654 approached by for-profits Van- contract as accountable care or- million remaining from a $1 billion ganizations. ACOs have the po- environmental bond passed by vot- 2 area defense contractors guard Health Systems Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina State Library Digital Collections
    5 South Carolina department of commerce the automotive industry in south carolina 2010 1201 main street, suite 1600 | columbia, sc 29201 (803) 737-0400 | (800) 868-7232 sccommerce.com | [email protected] 2 South Carolina’s automotive industry Fueling the state’s economy. south carolina’s automotive industry dates back to the early 1900s when milliken & company made fabric seats and roofs for Henry Ford’s gasoline-powered cars. this tradition shifted into the present when BMW decided to locate its first full manufacturing plant outside of Germany and its only north american assembly plant in south carolina in 1992. this was very significant automotive news and considered the most important automotive announcement in the south since toyota’s decision to manufacture vehicles in Kentucky in 1985. bmW joined other leading automotive companies already in south carolina, including the multiple operations of michelin and robert bosch. these premier automotive companies led the way for other top companies such as Daimler trucks north america, Honda all-terrain vehicles and many others. south carolina’s network of approximately 250 automotive-related companies and suppliers represents a major sector of the state’s economy and has been crucial in fueling south carolina’s development. Current automotive industry From Original Equipment Manufacturers to both Tier One and Tier Two suppliers, providing systems, sub-systems, components and materials, South Carolina’s automotive industry is vast. south carolina is recognized as a leader in automotive manufacturing in the united states, ranking #3 in automotive manufacturing strength “by Business Facilities magazine in July/august 2010. SCcommerce.com 3 south carolina is recognized as a leader in automotive manufacturing in the united states, ranking #3 in automotive manufacturing strength by Business Facilities magazine in July/ august 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecf 1300 Levi Korsinsky Declar
    Case 1:15-mc-00040-AKH Document 1300 Filed 12/17/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x In re AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL : Civil Action No. 1:15-mc-00040-AKH PROPERTIES, INC. LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION : This Document Relates To: : : ALL ACTIONS. : x DECLARATION OF ADAM M. APTON FILED ON BEHALF OF LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES Case 1:15-mc-00040-AKH Document 1300 Filed 12/17/19 Page 2 of 10 I, Adam M. Apton, declare as follows: 1. I am a partner with the firm of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP. I am submitting this declaration in support of my firm’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees in connection with services rendered in the above-entitled action. 2. This firm is counsel of record for plaintiffs Mitchell and Bonnie Ellis. Mitchell and Bonnie Ellis represented the interests of the members of the Class based on their respective purchases of American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. Series F Preferred Shares and/or common stock. During the litigation, our firm advised our clients concerning the case, reviewed various pleadings, and worked on discovery matters as it pertained to our clients. 3. The information in this declaration regarding the firm’s time is taken from time printouts and supporting documentation prepared and/or maintained by the firm in the ordinary course of business. I am the partner who oversaw activities in the litigation and reviewed these printouts in connection with the preparation of this declaration. The purpose of this review was to confirm both the accuracy of the entries on the printouts as well as the necessity for, and reasonableness of, the time committed to the litigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals Content Monthly Coverage Packet April 2009 - Worldscope
    FUNDAMENTALS CONTENT MONTHLY COVERAGE PACKET APRIL 2009 - WORLDSCOPE A SERIES OF RESOURCE DOCUMENTS HIGHLIGHTING THE BREADTH AND DEPTH OF THOMSON REUTERS WORLDSCOPE FUNDAMENTALS CONTENT For further information or assistance, please contact your local Thomson Reuters customer service or account team. North America: +1 888.888.1082 [email protected] [email protected] Europe: +44 (0) 870 458.1052 [email protected] Asia: +63 2 878.5772 [email protected] 1 NOTICE This document contains confidential and proprietary information of Thomson Reuters and may be used only by a recipient designated by and for purposes specified by Thomson Reuters. Reproduction of, dissemination of, modifications to, or creation of derivative works from this document, by any means and in any form or manner, is expressly prohibited, except with the prior written permission of Thomson Reuters. Permitted copies of this document must retain all proprietary notices contained in the original. The information in this document is subject to change without prior notice. Always confirm with Thomson Reuters that you are using the most current version of this document. Thomson Reuters is free to modify any of its products and services, in any manner and at any time, notwithstanding the information contained in this document. Certain information, including images, graphics, numerical or textual data pertaining to assets or securities may be included in this document to illustrate different types of products and services of Thomson Reuters. Such information may be fictitious or incomplete and should not be relied upon or considered investment advice. THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR GIVE RISE TO ANY LIABILITY OF THOMSON REUTERS, ITS AFFILIATES OR ITS SUPPLIERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Fund Asset Class Ticker Security Name CUSIP Number Shares/Par
    Fund Asset Class Ticker Security Name CUSIP Number Shares/Par Value Base Price Amount Base Market Value Interest Rate Maturity Date NQ11 EQUITY GREEN MOUNTAIN CAPITAL L.P '394990998 50 427.38 21369 0 NQ11 EQUITY NORTH ATLANTIC VENTURE FUND II '651991929 275572.22 1.959947 540106.95 0 NQ11 CASH EQUIVALENT STATE STREET BANK + TRUST CO '8611239B5 4483.64 100 4483.64 0.190652 12/31/2030 NQ20 CASH EQUIVALENT STATE STREET BANK + TRUST CO '8611239B5 196470.54 100 196470.54 0.190652 12/31/2030 NQ20 CASH US DOLLAR 'USD 0 1 0 0 NQ20 CASH US DOLLAR 'USD 12907.48 1 12907.48 0 NQ20 EQUITY NRTLQ NORTEL NETWORKS CORP '656568508 48 0.031 1.49 0 NQ2A EQUITY 5020 JX HOLDINGS INC 'B627LW906 202200 4.938411 998546.73 0 NQ2A EQUITY 510 HIAP SENG ENGINEERING LTD '616207908 132000 0.454838 60038.68 0 NQ2A EQUITY VOR SEQUANA CAPITAL '546924903 14919 12.255127 182834.25 0 NQ2A EQUITY 9842 ARC LAND SAKAMOTO CO LTD '604800904 5800 14.645723 84945.19 0 NQ2A EQUITY 7279 HI LEX CORP '664347002 12500 13.120127 164001.58 0 NQ2A EQUITY SBIDl STATE BANK OF INDIA SPON GDR '513109900 2000 99.9 199800 0 NQ2A EQUITY PKN POLSKI KONCERN NAFTOWY SA '581006905 10236 10.5059 107538.39 0 NQ2A EQUITY 9945 PLENUS CO LTD '669270902 3800 15.335066 58273.25 0 NQ2A EQUITY GIB/A CGI GROUP INC CL A '39945C950 80496 14.906131 1199883.91 0 NQ2A EQUITY CGO COGECO INC '19238T100 1200 28.231309 33877.57 0 NQ2A EQUITY 9936 OHSHO FOOD SERVICE CORP '666093901 4600 25.663917 118054.02 0 NQ2A EQUITY KIN KINEPOLIS '543952907 1419 52.854446 75000.46 0 NQ2A EQUITY SAAB B SAAB AB B '546955907 34176 11.449499
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Portfolio 2011
    Teachers’ Retirement System of the City of New York Investment Portfolios June 30, 2011 TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041 • www.trsnyc.org • 1 (888) 8-NYC-TRS February 2012 The Teachers’ Retirement System of the City of New York (TRS) is pleased to present you with our Investment Portfolios publication for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. This publication lists the name and value of each investment that TRS held in its six investment programs at the closing of the fiscal year. Cash, receivables, and collateral from securities-lending transactions are assets of TRS but not of the investment programs; therefore, they are not included in this report. TRS’ investments are described briefly below: The Pension Fund consists of U.S. and international equities and fixed-income instruments, with smaller allocations made to private equity and real estate investments. It contains the City’s contributions toward TRS members’ retirement allowances (pension reserves) and members’ contributions to the Qualified Pension Plan (QPP). It also includes the assets of the Fixed Return Fund, an investment option for members that provides a guaranteed rate of return; the rate is set by the New York State Legislature in accordance with applicable laws. The Diversified Equity Fund invests primarily in U.S. equities. The fund may also invest in international equities and other investments that may exhibit fixed-income characteristics. The objective is to achieve a rate of return comparable to the return of the broad equity market. The Stable-Value Fund invested in Guaranteed Investment Contracts (GICs), wrapped fixed-income securities, and other stable-value investment vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-09-157 International Taxation
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters GAO December 2008 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Large U.S. Corporations and Federal Contractors with Subsidiaries in Jurisdictions Listed as Tax Havens or Financial Privacy Jurisdictions GAO-09-157 December 2008 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Accountability Integrity Reliability Large U.S. Corporations and Federal Contractors with Highlights Subsidiaries in Jurisdictions Listed as Tax Havens or Highlights of GAO-09-157, a report to Financial Privacy Jurisdictions congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Many U.S. corporations operate Eighty-three of the 100 largest publicly traded U.S. corporations in terms of globally and have foreign 2007 revenue reported having subsidiaries in jurisdictions listed as tax havens subsidiaries. The subsidiaries may or financial privacy jurisdictions. Sixty-three of the 100 largest publicly traded be created, for example, to take U.S. federal contractors in terms of fiscal year 2007 federal contract advantage of sales opportunities or obligations reported having subsidiaries in such jurisdictions. Since favorable labor conditions. In some cases they may be used to reduce subsidiaries may be established in listed jurisdictions for a variety of nontax taxes. GAO was asked to update its business reasons, the existence of a subsidiary in a jurisdiction listed as a tax 2004 report on large federal haven or financial privacy jurisdiction does not signify that a corporation or contractors with subsidiaries in federal contractor established that subsidiary for the purpose of reducing its countries sometimes called tax tax burden. GAO did not attempt to determine if corporations or contractors havens because of low taxes and a with subsidiaries in such jurisdictions engaged in transactions with their general lack of transparency.
    [Show full text]
  • Mack Truck Ship to Codes for All Location
    Old Ship-to Code New Ship-to MACK DEPOT SHIP LOCATIONS STREET ADDRESS CITY ST ZIP CODE *100 – WHQ 4295 -- WORLD HEADQUARTERS 2100 MACK BOULEVARD - P.O. BOX M ALLENTOWN PA 18105 103 -- MMD 4285 -- MACUNGIE ASSEMBLY PLANT 7000 ALBURTIS ROAD MACUNGIE PA 18062 351 -- MMD 32092 -- LANCASTER PREFERRED PARNTERS 2919 OLD TREE ROAD LANCASTER PA 17601 361 -- MMD 21522 -- INTEGRATED LOGIST SOLUTIONS 7520 MORRIS COURT – SUITE 110 ALLENTOWN PA 18106 362 – MMD 37762 -- NEXUS DISTRIBUTION 7437 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD ALLENTOWN PA 18106 104 -- NRV 4287 -- NEW RIVER PLANT—ASSEMBLY 4875 COUGAR TRAIL ROAD DUBLIN VA 24084 401 -- NRV 9847 -- NEW RIVER PLANT-EAST DOCK 4875 COUGAR TRAIL ROAD DUBLIN VA 24084 402 -- NRV 9848 -- NEW RIVER PLANT-WEST DOCK 4875 COUGAR TRAIL ROAD DUBLIN VA 24084 403 -- NRV 9849 -- NEW RIVER PLANT-BODY IN WHITE 4875 COUGAR TRAIL ROAD DUBLIN VA 24084 451 27255 -- SALEM PREFERRED PARTNERS 236 ROWAN STREET SALEM VA 24153 452 62345 -- FINDLAY INDUSTRIES 4960 STEPP PLACE DUBLIN VA 24084 453 81172 -- FONTAINE MODIFICATION 5135 COUGAR TRAIL ROAD DUBLIN VA 24084 454 9850 -- IMPERIAL GROUP 4034 PEPPERELL WAY DUBLIN VA 24084 455 51916 -- MICHELIN ONE MICHELIN WAY INDEPENDENCE VA 24348 456 50148 -- IMPERIAL GROUP 4969 STEPP PLACE DUBLIN VA 24084 501 -- VLG 9990 -- VOLVO LOGISTICS GROUP 113 CORPORATE DRIVE RADFORD VA 24141 13302 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE HAGERSTOWN MD 21742 105 -- HAG 4289 -- VOLVO POWERTRAIN 106 -- EDT 4292 -- ENGINEERING TEST CENTER 2402 LEHIGH PARKWAY SOUTH ALLENTOWN PA 18103 117 -- TOR 9846 -- MACK CANADA, INC. 6155 BELGRAVE ROAD MISSISSAUGA
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Congress on Contracting Fraud
    Report to Congress on Contracting Fraud Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics October 2011 Preparation of this Report/study cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $81 ,000 for FY 2011. Generated on 2011 Oct06 1559 ReflD: D-3 15854E A. Background In the Committee Print of the Committee on Appropriations' Explanatory Statement, page 72, accompanying H.R. 3326, the Department of Defense (DoD) Appropriations Act, 2010 (Public Law 111-118) requested the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the DoD Inspector General (DoD IG), to report to the congressional defense committees on contracting fraud. The report is to include an assessment of the total value of DoD contracts entered into with contractors that have been indicted for, settled charges ot: been fined by any Federal department or agency for, or been convicted of fraud in connection with any contract or other transaction entered into with the Federal Government over the past 10 years. The report is also to include recommendations for penalties for contractors who are repeatedly involved in contract fraud allegations as well as actions the Department has taken to strengthen its policies and safeguards against contractor fraud. B. The DoD Approach to Dealing With Allegations of Procurement Fraud Pursuant to DoD Instruction 7050.05, "Coordination of Remedies for Fraud and Corruptions Related to Procurement Activities," each DoD Component is "required to monitor, from its inception, all significant investigations of fraud and corruption related to procurement activities affecting its organization." This monitoring is designed to focus DoD Components' attention on two general courses.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Driven
    2010 ANNUAL REPORT OSHKOSH CORPORATION 2307 Oregon Street OSHKOSH CORPORATION 2010 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2010 CORPORATION OSHKOSH Oshkosh, WI 54902 www.oshkoshcorporation.com MARKET LEADERSHIP + INNOVATIVE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS + CUSTOMER DRIVEN MISSION DRIVEN OSK0057-IR-AR10 _31704OshAnnCoverSpread.indd 1 12/2/10 1:44 PM Board of Directors Corporate Officers J. William Andersen(2) Harvey N. Medvin(2) PRINCIPAL OFFICERS SELECT OTHER CORPORATE OFFICERS Retired Executive Director of Retired Chief Financial Officer, Robert G. Bohn Patrick N. Davidson Development, University of Aon Corporation Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Vice President, Investor Relations Wisconsin—Oshkosh (4) (Retiring December 31, 2010) J. Peter Mosling, Jr. R. Scott Grennier (1) Robert G. Bohn Retired Officer of the Company Charles L. Szews Vice President, Treasurer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (1,2) President, Chief Operating Officer Craig P. Omtvedt Michael S. Guzowski of the Company and Chief Executive Officer-Elect Senior Vice President and Vice President, Information Technology (1,3,4) Richard M. Donnelly Chief Financial Officer, Bryan J. Blankfield Thomas J. Polnaszek Retired President, General Motors, Fortune Brands, Inc. Executive Vice President, General Senior Vice President, Europe (2) Counsel and Secretary Richard G. Sim Finance and Controller (3,4) Frederick M. Franks, Jr. Retired Chairman, President and Gregory L. Fredericksen Mark M. Radue Retired General, U.S. Army Chief Executive Officer, APW, Ltd. Executive Vice President, Vice President, Business Development Michael W. Grebe(1,3,4) Charles L. Szews Chief Procurement Officer President and Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer R. Andrew Hove The Lynde & Harry Bradley Foundation Executive Vice President and John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Mrap Vehicles Handbook
    HANDBOOKHANDBOOK No. 08-30 Sep 08 Tactics,Tactics, Techniques, Techniques, and and Procedures Procedures Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) http://call.army.mil Combined Arms Center (CAC)l Ft. Leavenworth, KS U.S. UNCLASSIFIED REL NATO, GCTF, ISAF, MCFI, ABCA For Official Use Only Handling Instructions for CALL Electronic Media and Paper Products Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) authorizes official use of this CALL product for operational and institutional purposes that contribute to the overall success of U.S., coalition, and allied efforts. The information contained in this product reflects the actions of units in the field and may not necessarily be approved U.S. Army policy or doctrine. This product is designed for official use by U.S., coalition, and allied personnel and cannot be released to the public without the expressed written consent of CALL. This product has been furnished with the expressed understanding that it will be used for official defense-related purposes only and that it will be afforded the same degree of protection that the U.S. affords information marked “U.S. UNCLASSIFIED, For Official Use Only [FOUO]” in accordance with U.S. Army Regulation (AR) 380-5, section 5-2. Official military and civil service/government personnel, to include all coalition and allied partners may paraphrase; quote; or use sentences, phrases, and paragraphs for integration into official products or research. However, integration of CALL “U.S. UNCLASSIFIED, For Official Use Only [FOUO]” information into official products or research renders them FOUO, and they must be maintained and controlled within official channels and cannot be released to the public without the expressed written consent of CALL.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Pentagon Spending by State Center
    PROFILES OF PENTAGON SPENDING BY STATE CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA AS OF DECEMBER 2012 Contact: William D. Hartung Email: [email protected] Tel.: 917-923-3202 Note: These profiles were assembled by Natalie Peterson, Daniel Resnick, and William D. Hartung Profiles of Pentagon Spending by State December 2012 Alabama ......................................................................................... page 4 Alaska ............................................................................................ page 9 Arizona .......................................................................................... page 16 Arkansas ........................................................................................ page 22 California ....................................................................................... page 28 Colorado ....................................................................................... page 36 Connecticut ................................................................................... page 42 Delaware ....................................................................................... page 47 District of Columbia ...................................................................... page 52 Florida ........................................................................................... page 56 Georgia ......................................................................................... page 64 Hawaii ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]