DOCSLIB.ORG

Armored Vehicle Manufacturing December 2018 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Armored Vehicle Manufacturing December 2018 1 WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Armored Vehicle Manufacturing December 2018 1 Defense mechanism: Rising defense spending and geopolitical tensions will boost industry demand IBISWorld Industry Report OD5855 Armored Vehicle Manufacturing December 2018 Maksim Soshkin 2 About this Industry 15 International Trade 31 Technology & Systems 2 Industry Definition 18 Business Locations 32 Revenue Volatility 2 Main Activities 32 Regulation & Policy 2 Similar Industries 20 Competitive Landscape 33 Industry Assistance 2 Additional Resources 20 Market Share Concentration 20 Key Success Factors 34 Key Statistics 3 Industry at a Glance 21 Cost Structure Benchmarks 34 Industry Data 22 Basis of Competition 34 Annual Change 4 Industry Performance 23 Barriers to Entry 34 Key Ratios 4 Executive Summary 24 Industry Globalization 4 Key External Drivers 35 Jargon & Glossary 6 Current Performance 25 Major Companies 8 Industry Outlook 25 BAE Systems PLC 10 Industry Life Cycle 26 General Dynamics Corporation 27 Oshkosh Corporation 12 Products & Markets 28 Navistar International Corporation 12 Supply Chain 29 Textron Inc. 12 Products & Services 14 Demand Determinants 30 Operating Conditions 14 Major Markets 30 Capital Intensity www.ibisworld.com | 1-800-330-3772 | [email protected] WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Armored Vehicle Manufacturing December 2018 2 About this Industry Industry Definition This industry includes establishments used in combat to transport infantry engaged in manufacturing, modifying, and munitions or to provide combat repairing and servicing military support. Tanks are not included in armored vehicles. These vehicles are this industry. Main Activities The primary activities of this industry are Manufacturing armored vehicles and parts Manufacturing self-propelled weapons Modification of armored vehicles Repair of armored vehicles The major products and services in this industry are Mobile artillery vehicles Tracked armored vehicles Wheeled armored vehicles Similar Industries 33611b SUV & Light Truck Manufacturing in the US This industry manufactures unarmored military universal carriers. 33641a Aircraft, Engine & Parts Manufacturing in the US This industry manufactures complete military aircraft, auxiliary equipment and parts. 33641b Space Vehicle & Missile Manufacturing in the US This industry manufactures complete missiles, military space vehicles, auxiliary equipment and parts. 33699b Tank & Armored Vehicle Manufacturing in the US This industry manufactures armored vehicles as well as tanks. Additional Resources For additional information on this industry www.loc.gov Library of Congress comptroller.defense.gov Under Secretary of Defense www.usitc.gov US International Trade Commission WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Armored Vehicle Manufacturing December 2018 3 Industry at a Glance Armored Vehicle Manufacturing in 2018 Key Statistics Revenue Annual Growth 13–18 Annual Growth 18–23 Snapshot $2.8bn -4.5% 6.6% Profit Exports Businesses $336.9m $1.3bn 58 Revenue vs. employment growth Federal funding for defense Market Share BAE Systems PLC 50 10 27.9% 25 5 General Dynamics Corporation 0 0 23.6% % change % change Oshkosh -25 -5 Corporation -50 -10 19.8% Year 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Year 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 Navistar Revenue Employment International SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Corporation Products and services segmentation (2018) 5.0% p. 25 22.4% Mobile artillery vehicles 45.8% Key External Drivers Tracked armored vehicles Federal funding for defense Non-NATO defense spending Price of steel Trade-weighted index 31.8% p. 4 Wheeled armored vehicles SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Industry Structure Life Cycle Stage Mature Regulation Level Heavy Revenue Volatility Very High Technology Change High Capital Intensity Medium Barriers to Entry High Industry Assistance Medium Industry Globalization Medium Concentration Level High Competition Level Medium FOR ADDITIONAL STATISTICS AND TIME SERIES SEE THE APPENDIX ON PAGE 34 WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Armored Vehicle Manufacturing December 2018 4 Industry Performance Executive Summary | Key External Drivers | Current Performance Industry Outlook | Life Cycle Stage Executive The Armored Vehicle Manufacturing pick-up in defense spending and the Summary industry experienced significant declines development and production of over the five years to 2018. Industry programs such as the Armored Multi- operators research, develop, Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) and the Joint manufacture, modify and repair military Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) have led armored vehicles, including infantry to an increase in US spending on fighting vehicles, armored personnel armored vehicles. Moreover, surging carriers, mine-resistant ambush international demand for US armored protected (MRAP) vehicles, self- vehicles driven by increased global propelled artillery and armored utility defense spending, tensions and vehicles. Prior to the five-year period, US conflict has helped offset weaker combat operations in the Middle East demand at home. Nevertheless, after and a climbing defense budget created a years of abnormal growth, exports are expected to fall in 2018. Consequently, industry revenue is expected to decline Surging international demand for US 7.3% in 2018, despite growing armored vehicles has helped offset weaker domestic demand. Over the five years to 2023, industry demand at home revenue is forecast to climb at an annualized rate of 6.6% to $3.9 billion. boom in demand for armored vehicles. The defense budget is anticipated to However, this trend reversed just before grow, and the development and the current five-year period. The United production of programs such as the States began to wind down combat AMPV and the JLTV should increase operations in the Middle East, the demand for industry products. defense budget was cut and sequestration Moreover, rising geopolitical tensions eventually kicked in. Consequently, the are anticipated to help operators industry is expected to decline at an maintain relatively high export orders annualized rate of 4.5% to $2.8 billion as more nations demand armored over the five years to 2018. vehicles to stay ahead of their rivals. However, much of this decline Operators will also benefit from occurred during the first half of the continued modification programs for five-year period. In more recent years, a the existing armored vehicle fleet. Key External Drivers Federal funding for defense Non-NATO defense spending The industry is highly sensitive to defense Non-NATO defense spending includes all spending. More specifically, the amount global defense spending, excluding the set aside solely for the procurement and members of the North Atlantic Treaty maintenance of armored vehicles is the Organization. As global defense spending most important driver of industry increases, many foreign governments revenue. When the procurement purchase US armored vehicles. In 2018, allocation falls, fewer contracts with non-NATO defense spending is expected manufacturers are signed and industry to increase. revenue declines. Federal funding for defense is expected to increase in 2018, Price of steel representing a potential opportunity for Steel is one of the primary inputs in the the industry. production of armored vehicles. When WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Armored Vehicle Manufacturing December 2018 5 Industry Performance Key External Drivers steel prices increase, operators can try to largest trading partners. A decreasing continued transfer the cost to customers. However, TWI leads to relatively less expensive if competition is strong and demand is exports and more expensive imports. weak, operators may have to absorb the Therefore, industry operators benefit increased costs, reducing profit. The price from a weak US dollar through of steel is expected to increase in 2018. increased demand for exports as well as weaker import competition for the Trade-weighted index same goods. The trade-weighted index The trade-weighted index (TWI) is expected to decrease in 2018, but it measures the value of the US dollar remains at an elevated level that poses relative to the currencies of the country’s a threat to the industry. Federal funding for defense Non-NATO defense spending 10 1.2 1.1 5 1.0 0 0.9 $ trillion % change 0.8 -5 0.7 -10 0.6 Year 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 Year 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Armored Vehicle Manufacturing December 2018 6 Industry Performance The Armored Vehicle Manufacturing Current industry began to drive out of a ditch Industry revenue over the past five years. Industry players Performance 50 research, develop, manufacture, modify and repair military armored vehicles including infantry fighting vehicles, 25 armored personnel carriers, mine- resistant ambush protected (MRAP) 0 vehicles, self-propelled artillery and % change armored utility vehicles. During the first -25 half of the five-year period, industry revenue plunged as US military spending -50 on industry products dropped from a Year 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 boom prior to the period. In more recent years, a pick-up in US defense spending, SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM a ramp-up of key industry programs and an overall rise in exports helped industry to 2018, industry revenue is expected to revenue to partially recover from earlier fall at an annualized rate of 4.5% to declines. Nevertheless, over the five years $2.8 billion. Start of a recovery The primary driver of industry in Afghanistan created a surge in performance is demand from the US demand for frontline armored vehicles. military. The industry’s recent increase in In particular, the heavy use of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hospitals Hungry Under Health Reform
    20120924-NEWS--0001-NAT-CCI-CD_-- 9/21/2012 6:41 PM Page 1 ® www.crainsdetroit.com Vol. 28, No. 40 SEPTEMBER 24 – 30, 2012 $2 a copy; $59 a year ©Entire contents copyright 2012 by Crain Communications Inc. All rights reserved Page 3 Bills aim to African violence Hospitals hungry under touches auto supply chain flow funds health to sewer Electronics retailer unplugs Michigan search reform projects Inside New loan, grant Tom Henderson on how Systems prowl not to save Belle Isle, for acquisitions programs sought Page 4 BY CHAD HALCOM BY AMY LANE Crain’s Lists CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS SPECIAL TO CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS The need for efficiency under Communities may get some help Largest IT companies, health care reform may be lead- JEFF JOHNSTON/CDB from Lansing in managing and im- ing to a wave of consolidation and proving one of the most critical largest architectural firms, the possible entry of more for- people covered by Medicaid and and costly pieces of their infra- Pages 18, 19 profit health care companies into those newly insured in 2014. structure — their aging sewer sys- Michigan. Other changes under reform in- tems. Crain’s reported Sept. 16 that clude hospitals working with On the move in the Legislature This Just In Beaumont Health System has been physicians and other providers to are bills that would take about $654 approached by for-profits Van- contract as accountable care or- million remaining from a $1 billion ganizations. ACOs have the po- environmental bond passed by vot- 2 area defense contractors guard Health Systems Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • OSB Representative Participant List by Industry
    OSB Representative Participant List by Industry Aerospace • KAWASAKI • VOLVO • CATERPILLAR • ADVANCED COATING • KEDDEG COMPANY • XI'AN AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY • CHINA FAW GROUP TECHNOLOGIES GROUP • KOREAN AIRLINES • CHINA INTERNATIONAL Agriculture • AIRBUS MARINE CONTAINERS • L3 COMMUNICATIONS • AIRCELLE • AGRICOLA FORNACE • CHRYSLER • LOCKHEED MARTIN • ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS • CARGILL • COMMERCIAL VEHICLE • M7 AEROSPACE GROUP • AVICHINA • E. RITTER & COMPANY • • MESSIER-BUGATTI- CONTINENTAL AIRLINES • BAE SYSTEMS • EXOPLAST DOWTY • CONTINENTAL • BE AEROSPACE • MITSUBISHI HEAVY • JOHN DEERE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES • • BELL HELICOPTER • MAUI PINEAPPLE CONTINENTAL • NASA COMPANY AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS • BOMBARDIER • • NGC INTEGRATED • USDA COOPER-STANDARD • CAE SYSTEMS AUTOMOTIVE Automotive • • CORNING • CESSNA AIRCRAFT NORTHROP GRUMMAN • AGCO • COMPANY • PRECISION CASTPARTS COSMA INDUSTRIAL DO • COBHAM CORP. • ALLIED SPECIALTY BRASIL • VEHICLES • CRP INDUSTRIES • COMAC RAYTHEON • AMSTED INDUSTRIES • • CUMMINS • DANAHER RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS • ANHUI JIANGHUAI • • DAF TRUCKS • DASSAULT AVIATION RAYTHEON MISSLE AUTOMOBILE SYSTEMS COMPANY • • ARVINMERITOR DAIHATSU MOTOR • EATON • RAYTHEON NCS • • ASHOK LEYLAND DAIMLER • EMBRAER • RAYTHEON RMS • • ATC LOGISTICS & DALPHI METAL ESPANA • EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC • ROLLS-ROYCE DEFENCE AND SPACE ELECTRONICS • DANA HOLDING COMPANY • ROTORCRAFT • AUDI CORPORATION • FINMECCANICA ENTERPRISES • • AUTOZONE DANA INDÚSTRIAS • SAAB • FLIR SYSTEMS • • BAE SYSTEMS DELPHI • SMITH'S DETECTION • FUJI • • BECK/ARNLEY DENSO CORPORATION
    [Show full text]
  • JLG 10 MSP.Qxd:Layout 1 27/3/08 10:55 Page 1
    JLG 10 MSP.qxd:Layout 1 27/3/08 10:55 Page 1 Vertical Personnel Lifts JLG Model 10 MSP Platform Functional Equipment & Available Options Accessories 0.69 m x 0.50 m (W x L) Operator Programmable 4 digit security lock platform self closing saloon style gates Low maintenance anodised aluminium mast Travel alarm 0.66 m x 0.66 m (W x L) Adjustable height material tray Pothole Protection System (PHP) Guide roller system Carry deck on chassis Manual Descent Safety interlocked controls Tilt light and alarm Point & Go® fully proportional Key lock main power switch drive/steer single joystick control Hour meter Joystick enable for lift and drive Transportation tie-down lugs Variable speed elevation control Fork truck pockets Lanyard attachment anchor Horn Amber strobe light Power & Transmission 2 x Sealed 12V,100 A/Hr maintenance-free AGM batteries Automatic 5 hour battery charger On-board diagnostics Automatic power-off battery saver control Battery discharge indicator (located on platform and base) Direct electric two wheel drive Heavy duty planetary gear hubs Non mark tyres and casters Brake release Non-marking tyres JLG Industries Inc. Polaris Avenue 63 2132 JH Hoofddorp The Netherlands Tel: +31 (0)23 565 5665 Fax: +31 (0)23 557 2493 e-mail address: [email protected] www.jlgeurope.com An Oshkosh Corporation Company Printed in UK FORM No.: DS003-0208-500 PART NO.: DS003-ENGLISH JLG 10 MSP.qxd:Layout 1 27/3/08 10:55 Page 2 Vertical Personnel Lifts JLG Model 10 MSP 10MSP Working height 5.05 m Platform height 3.05 m Operator platform capacity 160
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS by MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008
    Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS BY MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008 MANUFACTURER RECALLS VEHICLES ACCUBUIL T, INC 1 8 AM GENERAL CORPORATION 1 980 AMERICAN EAGLE MOTORCYCLE CO 1 14 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO 8 212,212 AMERICAN SUNDIRO MOTORCYCLE 1 2,183 AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORP. 4 25,023 AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORP. 5 1,441 APRILIA USA INC. 2 409 ASTON MARTIN 2 666 ATHEY PRODUCTS CORP. 3 304 B. FOSTER & COMPANY, INC. 1 422 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE 11 28,738 BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY 12 62,692 BUELL MOTORCYCLE CO 4 12,230 CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC. 1 818 CARPENTER INDUSTRIES, INC. 2 6,838 CLASSIC LIMOUSINE 1 492 CLASSIC MANUFACTURING, INC. 1 8 COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC. 8 5,271 COACHMEN RV COMPANY 1 576 COLLINS BUS CORPORATION 1 286 COUNTRY COACH INC 6 519 CRANE CARRIER COMPANY 1 138 DABRYAN COACH BUILDERS 1 723 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 30 6,700,752 DAMON CORPORATION 3 824 DAVINCI COACHWORKS, INC 1 144 D'ELEGANT CONVERSIONS, INC. 1 34 DORSEY TRAILERS, INC. 1 210 DUTCHMEN MANUFACTURING, INC 1 105 ELDORADO NATIONAL 1 173 ELECTRIC TRANSIT, INC. 1 54 ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 1 40 E-ONE, INC. 1 3 EUROPA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2 242 EXECUTIVE COACH BUILDERS 1 702 FEATHERLITE LUXURY COACHES 1 83 FEATHERLITE, INC. 2 3,235 FEDERAL COACH, LLC 1 230 FERRARI NORTH AMERICA 8 1,601 FLEETWOOD ENT., INC. 5 12, 119 FORD MOTOR COMPANY 60 7,485,466 FOREST RIVER, INC. 1 115 FORETRAVEL, INC. 3 478 FOURWINNS 2 2,276 FREIGHTLINER CORPORATION 27 233,032 FREIGHTLINER LLC 1 803 GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • Oshkosh Corporation
    AT-A-GLANCE Oshkosh Corporation is a leading designer, The top priorities of our 13,800 team members manufacturer and marketer of a broad range are to serve and delight our customers as well of access equipment, specialty military, fire & as drive superior operating performance to emergency and commercial vehicles and vehicle benefit our shareholders. We do this through bodies. Our products are valued worldwide by rental execution of our MOVE strategy and by leveraging companies, defense forces, concrete placement our strengths and resources in engineering, and refuse businesses, fire & emergency departments manufacturing, purchasing and distribution and municipal and airport services, where high across our four business segments. quality, superior performance, rugged reliability and long-term value are paramount. Approximately 24% of our revenues came from outside the United States in fiscal 2016 and we We partner with our customers to deliver superior have manufacturing operations in eight U.S. states solutions that safely and efficiently move people and in Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, and materials at work, around the globe and around Mexico, Romania and the United Kingdom as well the clock. as operations to support sales or deliver service in over 150 countries. We believe our business model makes us a different integrated global industrial and supports our Our company was founded in 1917 and we look goals of driving superior value for both customers forward to celebrating our 100th anniversary in and shareholders. Our business model brings 2017. We are proud of our strong culture and together a unique set of integrated capabilities and operating performance that contribute to our diverse end markets to position our company to be positive outlook as we prepare to celebrate 100 successful in a variety of economic environments.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina State Library Digital Collections
    5 South Carolina department of commerce the automotive industry in south carolina 2010 1201 main street, suite 1600 | columbia, sc 29201 (803) 737-0400 | (800) 868-7232 sccommerce.com | [email protected] 2 South Carolina’s automotive industry Fueling the state’s economy. south carolina’s automotive industry dates back to the early 1900s when milliken & company made fabric seats and roofs for Henry Ford’s gasoline-powered cars. this tradition shifted into the present when BMW decided to locate its first full manufacturing plant outside of Germany and its only north american assembly plant in south carolina in 1992. this was very significant automotive news and considered the most important automotive announcement in the south since toyota’s decision to manufacture vehicles in Kentucky in 1985. bmW joined other leading automotive companies already in south carolina, including the multiple operations of michelin and robert bosch. these premier automotive companies led the way for other top companies such as Daimler trucks north america, Honda all-terrain vehicles and many others. south carolina’s network of approximately 250 automotive-related companies and suppliers represents a major sector of the state’s economy and has been crucial in fueling south carolina’s development. Current automotive industry From Original Equipment Manufacturers to both Tier One and Tier Two suppliers, providing systems, sub-systems, components and materials, South Carolina’s automotive industry is vast. south carolina is recognized as a leader in automotive manufacturing in the united states, ranking #3 in automotive manufacturing strength “by Business Facilities magazine in July/august 2010. SCcommerce.com 3 south carolina is recognized as a leader in automotive manufacturing in the united states, ranking #3 in automotive manufacturing strength by Business Facilities magazine in July/ august 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o Check the appropriate box: o Preliminary Proxy Statement o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) x Definitive Proxy Statement o Definitive Additional Materials o Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 Oshkosh Corporation (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): x No fee required. o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule
    [Show full text]
  • Oshkosh Corporation Incoming Letter Dated September 20, 2016
    November 4, 2016 Marc S. Gerber Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP [email protected] Re: Oshkosh Corporation Incoming letter dated September 20, 2016 Dear Mr. Gerber: This is in response to your letter dated September 20, 2016 concerning the shareholder proposal submitted to Oshkosh by John Chevedden. Copies of all of the correspondence on which this response is based will be made available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/14a-8.shtml. For your reference, a brief discussion of the Division’s informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals is also available at the same website address. Sincerely, Matt S. McNair Senior Special Counsel Enclosure cc: John Chevedden ***FISMA & OMB Memorandum M-07-16*** November 4, 2016 Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Re: Oshkosh Corporation Incoming letter dated September 20, 2016 The proposal asks the board to amend certain provisions of the company’s proxy access bylaw in the manner specified in the proposal. There appears to be some basis for your view that Oshkosh may exclude the proposal under rule 14a-8(i)(10). Based on the information you have presented, it appears that Oshkosh’s policies, practices and procedures compare favorably with the guidelines of the proposal and that Oshkosh has, therefore, substantially implemented the proposal. Accordingly, we will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if Oshkosh omits the proposal from its proxy materials in reliance on rule 14a-8(i)(10). Sincerely, Evan S. Jacobson Special Counsel DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE INFORMAL PROCEDURES REGARDING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS The Division of Corporation Finance believes that its responsibility with respect to matters arising under Rule 14a-8 [17 CFR 240.14a-8], as with other matters under the proxy rules, is to aid those who must comply with the rule by offering informal advice and suggestions and to determine, initially, whether or not it may be appropriate in a particular matter to recommend enforcement action to the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities Targeted to the People You Want to Meet and the Visibility to Grow Your Brand
    Opportunities targeted to the people you want to meet and the visibility to grow your brand. • • • • • • • • • • 3M Company Electromed Inc. MGC Diagnostics Corporation Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. ASK LLP A. O. Smith Corporation EMC Insurance Group Inc. MOCON, Inc. SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. Ballard Spahr, LLP (Lindquist & Vennum) Allete Inc. EnteroMedics Inc. Moody's (formerly Advent Software) BlackRock, Inc. Alliant Energy Corporation Evolving Systems, Inc. Mosaic Co. St. Jude Medical, Inc. Bloomberg L.P. Ameriprise Financial, Inc. Famous Dave’s of America MTS Systems Corporation Stamps.com Inc. BNY Mellon Brand Advantage Group Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Fastenal Company Multiband Corp. Steelcase Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. Arctic Cat Inc. FBL Financial Group, Inc. Navarre Stratasys, Ltd. Business Wire Sunshine Heart Inc Associated Bank FHLBanks Office of Finance New Jersey Resources Corporation CFA Institute SUPERVALU Inc. AstraZeneca plc FICO Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. Curran & Connors AxoGen, Inc. First Business NorthWestern Energy Corp SurModics, Inc. Deluxe Corporation Bemis Company, Inc. Financial Services, Inc. NVE Corporation Target Corporation Drexel Hamilton, LLC Best Buy, Co., Inc. FLUX Power Holdings, Inc. OneBeacon Insurance Group TCF Financial Corporation EQS Group Bio-Techne Corporation G&K Services, Inc. Orion Engineered Carbons S.A. Tennant Company FactSet Research Systems Inc. Black Hills Corp. General Mills, Inc. Oshkosh Corporation Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Boston Scientific Corporation Graco, Inc. OSI Systems, Inc. The Toro Company Inspired Investment Leadership: Objective Measure Conference Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. H.B. Fuller Company Otter Tail Corporation Tile Shop Holdings Inc Intrinsic Research Systems Inc. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. Heartland Financial USA, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report Statement of Company Business Stockholders’ Information
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT STATEMENT OF COMPANY BUSINESS STOCKHOLDERS’ INFORMATION PACCAR is a global technology company that designs and manufactures premium quality light, medium and heavy duty commercial vehicles sold worldwide under Corporate Offices Stock Transfer Trademarks Owned by PACCAR Building and Dividend PACCAR Inc and its 777 106th Avenue N.E. Dispersing Agent Subsidiaries the Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF nameplates. PACCAR designs and manufactures Bellevue, Washington Equiniti Trust Company DAF, EPIQ, Kenmex, 98004 Shareowner Services Kenworth, Leyland, diesel engines and other powertrain components for use in its own products and for P.O. Box 64854 PACCAR, PACCAR MX-11, Mailing Address St. Paul, Minnesota PACCAR MX-13, PACCAR P.O. Box 1518 55164-0854 PX, PacFuel, PacLease, sale to third party manufacturers of trucks and buses. PACCAR distributes Bellevue, Washington 800.468.9716 PacLink, PacTax, PacTrac, 98009 www.shareowneronline.com PacTrainer, Peterbilt, aftermarket truck parts to its dealers through a worldwide network of Parts The World’s Best, TRP, Telephone PACCAR’s transfer agent TruckTech+, SmartNav, and 425.468.7400 maintains the company’s SmartLINQ Distribution Centers. Finance and leasing subsidiaries facilitate the sale of shareholder records, issues Facsimile stock certificates and Independent Auditors PACCAR products in many countries worldwide. PACCAR manufactures and 425.468.8216 distributes dividends and Ernst & Young LLP IRS Forms 1099. Requests Seattle, Washington Website concerning these matters markets industrial
    [Show full text]
  • 5/1/2020 2020 Personal Property Assessment Roll - Open Book City of Oshkosh, Wi
    5/1/2020 2020 PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT ROLL - OPEN BOOK CITY OF OSHKOSH, WI PARID CD TID SCH DIST Business Name Boat, Watercraft Furn, Fix, Office, Equip Copiers, X-Ray, Other BOLL Totals 201034000 A 4179 2 BLONDES 0 400 100 0 500 200960000 D 4179 2400 WITZEL AVE LLC 82600 82600 200559000 D 4179 2IMPRESS 28000 28000 201265000 O 4179 2ND CHANCE GOODS 0 3400 900 0 4300 101240000 O 20 4179 44 DEGRESS NORTH/ENCORE EVENT PLANNING 0 1400 700 0 2100 889281000 O 15 4179 4IMPRINT 0 1456300 46900 0 1503200 201601000 D 4179 9 ROUND FITNESS 4600 4600 200899000 O 4179 920 TATTOO COMPANY 0 400 1400 0 1800 201632000 O 4179 9TH AVENUE BP 0 8400 12000 0 20400 800123000 D 4179 A & W DRIVE IN - OSHKOSH 7700 7700 867150000 A 4179 A CUT ABOVE THE REST 0 17000 500 0 17500 800130000 A 4179 A KALMERTON WELDING SUPPLIES 0 1800 1700 0 3500 200736000 D 4179 A TOUCH OF CLASS PET RESORT 10700 10700 200447000 D 4179 A TOUCH OF CLASS PET SPA 20400 20400 201195000 D 4179 A+ AUTOMOTIVE TIRE & BRAKE 100 100 201738000 D 4179 AACE INVESEMENTS 200 200 201752000 A 4179 ABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY OPTIONS LLC 0 1800 100 0 1900 200873000 D 4179 ABR EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 4800 4800 200777000 D 4179 ABSOLUTE THERAPEUTIC SPA 4100 4100 200415000 D 4179 ABSOLUTE TRANFORMATION SALON 2700 2700 200295000 A 4179 ACC MANAGEMENT GROUP 0 9500 600 0 10100 200383000 A 4179 ACCELERATED CARE PLUS LEASING INC 0 10300 0 0 10300 800700000 O 21 4179 ACCU-COM 0 6200 3700 0 9900 105200000 O 4179 ACEE DEUCEE BAR 0 100 200 0 300 201412000 A 4179 ACTION AUTO BODY 0 100 100 0 200 117157000 D 4179 ACTION
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation – Update January 2012 Forward-Looking Statements
    MISSION DRIVEN: To Move the World at Work Oshkosh Corporation Investor Presentation – Update January 2012 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains statements that the Company believes to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy, targets, projected sales, costs, earnings, capital expenditures, debt levels and cash flows, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “should,” “project” or “plan” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward- looking statements. These factors include the expected level and timing of DoD procurement of products and services and funding thereof, including the impact of the DoD’s allocation of certain tires which will restrict and delay certain FHTV sales; risks related to reductions in government expenditures in light of U.S.
    [Show full text]