Mrap Vehicles Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mrap Vehicles Handbook HANDBOOKHANDBOOK No. 08-30 Sep 08 Tactics,Tactics, Techniques, Techniques, and and Procedures Procedures Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) http://call.army.mil Combined Arms Center (CAC)l Ft. Leavenworth, KS U.S. UNCLASSIFIED REL NATO, GCTF, ISAF, MCFI, ABCA For Official Use Only Handling Instructions for CALL Electronic Media and Paper Products Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) authorizes official use of this CALL product for operational and institutional purposes that contribute to the overall success of U.S., coalition, and allied efforts. The information contained in this product reflects the actions of units in the field and may not necessarily be approved U.S. Army policy or doctrine. This product is designed for official use by U.S., coalition, and allied personnel and cannot be released to the public without the expressed written consent of CALL. This product has been furnished with the expressed understanding that it will be used for official defense-related purposes only and that it will be afforded the same degree of protection that the U.S. affords information marked “U.S. UNCLASSIFIED, For Official Use Only [FOUO]” in accordance with U.S. Army Regulation (AR) 380-5, section 5-2. Official military and civil service/government personnel, to include all coalition and allied partners may paraphrase; quote; or use sentences, phrases, and paragraphs for integration into official products or research. However, integration of CALL “U.S. UNCLASSIFIED, For Official Use Only [FOUO]” information into official products or research renders them FOUO, and they must be maintained and controlled within official channels and cannot be released to the public without the expressed written consent of CALL. This product may be placed on protected UNCLASSIFIED intranets within military organizations or units, provided that access is restricted through user ID and password or other authentication means to ensure that only properly accredited military and government officials have access to these products. Regulations strictly forbid posting CALL “U.S. UNCLASSIFIED, For Official Use Only [FOUO]” documents to Department of Defense (DOD) Websites that do not restrict access to authorized personnel. AR-25-1, 15 Jul 2005, Army Knowledge Management and Information Technology, paragraph 6-4 n (2) (b) and DOD Web Site Administration Policy and Procedures (11 Jan 2002), Part II, paragraph 3.6.1 require appropriate mechanisms to protect sensitive information. When no longer needed, all CALL “U.S. UNCLASSIFIED, For Official Use Only [FOUO]” paper products and electronic media will be shredded or destroyed using approved paper shredders or CDROM destroyers. To allied and coalition personnel: This information is furnished with the understanding that it is to be used for defense purposes only, that it is to be afforded essentially the same degree of security protection as such information is afforded by the United States, and that it is not to be revealed to another country or international organization without the written consent of CALL. U.S. UNCLASSIFIED REL NATO, GCTF, ISAF, MCFI, ABCA For Official Use Only MRAP VEHICLES HANDBOOK Foreword This book describes the general capabilities and limitations of the mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicle and associated tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP) employed by MRAP-equipped units. The essential information presented in this book is a guide to assist commanders, leaders, and Warfighters in preparing for and conducting operations with MRAP vehicles against an asymmetric, dedicated, and innovative threat in current and future areas of operations. MRAP vehicles are providing a significant increase in force protection and enhancing the confidence of Warfighters engaging the enemy. In many cases, Warfighters have survived attacks that would have completely destroyed other armored vehicles. This level of protection did not come without trade-offs in performance. The MRAP vehicle's size, weight, and height above ground contribute to its armor to make it a very survivable vehicle; however, they also affect its overall maneuverability and mobility. Developers intend to address the mobility issue with a restricted terrain MRAP variant that can provide the protection similar to the current MRAP vehicle and the mobility similar to the high-mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicle. This capability will increase the Warfighters’ effectiveness by giving them the ability to operate in areas previously denied to the MRAP vehicle due to its size and weight. TTP for employing MRAP vehicles are similar to those used with existing vehicles; therefore, the aim of this book is to acquaint users with the capabilities and limitations of the MRAP vehicle and identify how it may influence planning and executing tactical missions. While this book serves as a starting point, units must continually analyze how the MRAP vehicle affects operations in their current mission and share that information with their unit and across the services. Warfighters and leaders must understand and not exceed the operating limitations of their specific MRAP vehicle. The safety guidelines outlined in this book will ensure you operate the vehicle to its fullest capability, safely allowing you to fight and win in combat. We continue to examine and anticipate the war-fighting needs of our deployed forces. Based on lessons learned and with help from industry, future MRAP vehicles will have improved capability. Units who successfully employ these vehicles against the enemy do so by integrating protection with training, planning, smart tactics, and well-rehearsed drills. This knowledge and preparation will help accomplish your missions and possibly save your life. WALTER WOJDAKOWSKI Major General, USA Commanding U.S. UNCLASSIFIED REL NATO, GCTF, ISAF, MCFI, ABCA i For Official Use Only MRAP VEHICLES HANDBOOK MRAP Vehicles Handbook Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1. Program Overview 3 Chapter 2. Vehicle Descriptions 5 Chapter 3. Mission Equipment Packages 19 Chapter 4. Configuration/Mission Crosswalk 21 Chapter 5. Operating Speeds 23 Chapter 6. Capabilities and Limitations 25 Chapter 7. Employment Considerations 31 Chapter 8. Tactical Manning 45 Chapter 9. Load Plans 49 Chapter 10. Individual Protective Measures 65 Chapter 11. Casualty Evacuation Procedures 71 Chapter 12. Recovery and Towing Operations and Damage Reporting 77 Appendix A. Recovery and Towing Operations 81 Appendix B-1. Rollover/Egress Procedures 125 B-2. Surviving Contact with High-Voltage Power Lines 133 B-3. Necessary Precautions During Battlefield Vehicle Crew 139 Rescue, Recovery, and Forensic Collection Efforts Appendix C. Warnings and Cautions Common to the Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected Vehicle 143 U.S. UNCLASSIFIED REL NATO, GCTF, ISAF, MCFI, ABCA iii For Official Use Only CENTER FOR ARMY LESSONS LEARNED Center for Army Lessons Learned Director Colonel Robert W. Forrester Managing Editor George J. Mordica II CALL Analyst Scott Blaney Contributors Colonel Robert W. Radcliffe Thomas J. Stafford Production Coordinator Valerie Tystad Editor Jenny Solon Graphic Artist Eric Eck Distribution Cole Davis Bryon Gaudreau The Secretary of the Army has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the public business as required by law of the Department. Unless otherwise stated, whenever the masculine or feminine gender is used, both are intended. Note: Any publications (other than CALL publications) referenced in this product, such as ARs, FMs, and TMs, must be obtained through your pinpoint distribution system. U.S. UNCLASSIFIED iv REL NATO, GCTF, ISAF, MCFI, ABCA For Official Use Only MRAP VEHICLES HANDBOOK Introduction “The companies that have been awarded the MRAP [mine-resistant ambush-protected] contracts are ramping up their production capabilities … I am pressing them very hard to see where they can cut the time scale as well as increase their production …. You have to look outside the normal bureaucratic way of doing things and so does industry—because lives are at stake.” –Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, March 27, 2007 This book will familiarize Warfighters and leaders with the MRAP vehicle, its capabilities and limitations, and planning considerations for its employment. The information found in this book does not replace or override any safety precautions, warnings, notes in existing technical and/or operator manuals, or unit standing orders or operating procedures. The acronym “MRAP” does not mean any one specific vehicle. It is a generic term intended to apply to vehicles from different manufacturers that meet a common set of capabilities. There are several manufacturers, each providing a unique variant of the MRAP vehicle. The photos and drawings used in this book are not intended to imply a preference for any specific design or manufacturer. They are simply representative of the family of MRAP vehicles. The joint services are fielding these vehicles to improve the force protection of units operating in the high-threat areas of Iraq and Afghanistan. The fielding plan is based on threat levels; units with the highest threat level have the priority for MRAP vehicles. There are three categories of MRAP vehicles. Category (CAT) I and CAT II vehicles carry six and ten Warfighters respectively and supplement missions performed with the up-armored high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicle and other combat vehicles. CAT III vehicles are used to support route clearance missions. Since the tactics, techniques,
Recommended publications
  • The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle
    Canadian Military History Volume 20 Issue 2 Article 4 2011 The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Frank Maas Wilfrid Laurier University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Recommended Citation Maas, Frank "The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle." Canadian Military History 20, 2 (2011) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maas: Light Armoured Vehicle The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Frank Maas he seeds for Canada’s purchase Cadillac-Gage, but the owner of of the Light Armoured Vehicle Abstract: Since the 1970s, budget Swiss firm MOWAG, Walter Ruf, T constraints and debates over the (LAV) lie as far back as 1964, when tank’s relevance have prompted came to the Department of National the Defence White Paper called for the Canadian Forces (CF) to pursue Defence (DND) in Ottawa to present the creation of a force equipped with lighter, cheaper, and more flexible his company’s new vehicle design, a flexible, light, and air-transportable vehicles. The Light Armoured Vehicle the “Piranha.”7 DND indicated that vehicle to serve in UN missions. This (LAV), built in London, Ontario, has the vehicle must be built in Canada to been purchased in great numbers resulted in a confused reaction that to satisfy these demands, and it have a chance of winning the bid, and saw the Canadian Forces (CF) looking has largely succeeded.
    [Show full text]
  • Hospitals Hungry Under Health Reform
    20120924-NEWS--0001-NAT-CCI-CD_-- 9/21/2012 6:41 PM Page 1 ® www.crainsdetroit.com Vol. 28, No. 40 SEPTEMBER 24 – 30, 2012 $2 a copy; $59 a year ©Entire contents copyright 2012 by Crain Communications Inc. All rights reserved Page 3 Bills aim to African violence Hospitals hungry under touches auto supply chain flow funds health to sewer Electronics retailer unplugs Michigan search reform projects Inside New loan, grant Tom Henderson on how Systems prowl not to save Belle Isle, for acquisitions programs sought Page 4 BY CHAD HALCOM BY AMY LANE Crain’s Lists CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS SPECIAL TO CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS The need for efficiency under Communities may get some help Largest IT companies, health care reform may be lead- JEFF JOHNSTON/CDB from Lansing in managing and im- ing to a wave of consolidation and proving one of the most critical largest architectural firms, the possible entry of more for- people covered by Medicaid and and costly pieces of their infra- Pages 18, 19 profit health care companies into those newly insured in 2014. structure — their aging sewer sys- Michigan. Other changes under reform in- tems. Crain’s reported Sept. 16 that clude hospitals working with On the move in the Legislature This Just In Beaumont Health System has been physicians and other providers to are bills that would take about $654 approached by for-profits Van- contract as accountable care or- million remaining from a $1 billion ganizations. ACOs have the po- environmental bond passed by vot- 2 area defense contractors guard Health Systems Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected (MRAP) Vehicles: Background and Issues for Congress
    Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected (MRAP) Vehicles: Background and Issues for Congress Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces January 18, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22707 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected (MRAP) Vehicles Summary Congress has played a central role in the MRAP program by suggesting to defense and service officials that MRAPs would provide far superior protection for troops than did the up-armored High Mobility, Multi-Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWVs ). Congressional support for MRAPs, as well as fully funding the program, has been credited with getting these vehicles to Iraq and Afghanistan in a relatively short timeframe, thereby helping to reduce casualties. Congress may likely continue to be interested in the MRAP program to ensure that the appropriate types and numbers of these vehicles are fielded, as well as to monitor the post-conflict disposition of these vehicles, as they represent a significant investment. In 2007, the Department of Defense (DOD) launched a major procurement initiative to replace most up-armored HMMWVs in Iraq with Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected (MRAP) vehicles. MRAPs have been described as providing significantly more protection against Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) than up-armored HMMWVs. Currently, DOD has approved an acquisition objective of 25,700 vehicles, of which 8,100 are the newer Military-All-Terrain Vehicle (M-ATV) version, designed to meet the challenges of Afghanistan’s rugged terrain. DOD officials have indicated that this total may be increased depending on operational needs in Afghanistan. DOD reports that as of January 6, 2011, 13,624 MRAPs had been delivered to Afghanistan, including more than 6,500 M-ATVs.
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to the GEOLOGY of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: the Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island
    A GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY OF THE SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA: THE GEOLOGY AND LIFE ZONES OF A MADREAN SKY ISLAND ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 22 JOHN V. BEZY Inside front cover. Sabino Canyon, 30 December 2010. (Megan McCormick, flickr.com (CC BY 2.0). A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island John V. Bezy Arizona Geological Survey Down-to-Earth 22 Copyright©2016, Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved Book design: M. Conway & S. Mar Photos: Dr. Larry Fellows, Dr. Anthony Lux and Dr. John Bezy unless otherwise noted Printed in the United States of America Permission is granted for individuals to make single copies for their personal use in research, study or teaching, and to use short quotes, figures, or tables, from this publication for publication in scientific books and journals, provided that the source of the information is appropriately cited. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new or collective works, or for resale. The reproduction of multiple copies and the use of articles or extracts for comer- cial purposes require specific permission from the Arizona Geological Survey. Published by the Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, #100, Tucson, AZ 85701 www.azgs.az.gov Cover photo: Pinnacles at Catalina State Park, Courtesy of Dr. Anthony Lux ISBN 978-0-9854798-2-4 Citation: Bezy, J.V., 2016, A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina State Library Digital Collections
    5 South Carolina department of commerce the automotive industry in south carolina 2010 1201 main street, suite 1600 | columbia, sc 29201 (803) 737-0400 | (800) 868-7232 sccommerce.com | [email protected] 2 South Carolina’s automotive industry Fueling the state’s economy. south carolina’s automotive industry dates back to the early 1900s when milliken & company made fabric seats and roofs for Henry Ford’s gasoline-powered cars. this tradition shifted into the present when BMW decided to locate its first full manufacturing plant outside of Germany and its only north american assembly plant in south carolina in 1992. this was very significant automotive news and considered the most important automotive announcement in the south since toyota’s decision to manufacture vehicles in Kentucky in 1985. bmW joined other leading automotive companies already in south carolina, including the multiple operations of michelin and robert bosch. these premier automotive companies led the way for other top companies such as Daimler trucks north america, Honda all-terrain vehicles and many others. south carolina’s network of approximately 250 automotive-related companies and suppliers represents a major sector of the state’s economy and has been crucial in fueling south carolina’s development. Current automotive industry From Original Equipment Manufacturers to both Tier One and Tier Two suppliers, providing systems, sub-systems, components and materials, South Carolina’s automotive industry is vast. south carolina is recognized as a leader in automotive manufacturing in the united states, ranking #3 in automotive manufacturing strength “by Business Facilities magazine in July/august 2010. SCcommerce.com 3 south carolina is recognized as a leader in automotive manufacturing in the united states, ranking #3 in automotive manufacturing strength by Business Facilities magazine in July/ august 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecf 1300 Levi Korsinsky Declar
    Case 1:15-mc-00040-AKH Document 1300 Filed 12/17/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x In re AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL : Civil Action No. 1:15-mc-00040-AKH PROPERTIES, INC. LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION : This Document Relates To: : : ALL ACTIONS. : x DECLARATION OF ADAM M. APTON FILED ON BEHALF OF LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES Case 1:15-mc-00040-AKH Document 1300 Filed 12/17/19 Page 2 of 10 I, Adam M. Apton, declare as follows: 1. I am a partner with the firm of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP. I am submitting this declaration in support of my firm’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees in connection with services rendered in the above-entitled action. 2. This firm is counsel of record for plaintiffs Mitchell and Bonnie Ellis. Mitchell and Bonnie Ellis represented the interests of the members of the Class based on their respective purchases of American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. Series F Preferred Shares and/or common stock. During the litigation, our firm advised our clients concerning the case, reviewed various pleadings, and worked on discovery matters as it pertained to our clients. 3. The information in this declaration regarding the firm’s time is taken from time printouts and supporting documentation prepared and/or maintained by the firm in the ordinary course of business. I am the partner who oversaw activities in the litigation and reviewed these printouts in connection with the preparation of this declaration. The purpose of this review was to confirm both the accuracy of the entries on the printouts as well as the necessity for, and reasonableness of, the time committed to the litigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals Content Monthly Coverage Packet April 2009 - Worldscope
    FUNDAMENTALS CONTENT MONTHLY COVERAGE PACKET APRIL 2009 - WORLDSCOPE A SERIES OF RESOURCE DOCUMENTS HIGHLIGHTING THE BREADTH AND DEPTH OF THOMSON REUTERS WORLDSCOPE FUNDAMENTALS CONTENT For further information or assistance, please contact your local Thomson Reuters customer service or account team. North America: +1 888.888.1082 [email protected] [email protected] Europe: +44 (0) 870 458.1052 [email protected] Asia: +63 2 878.5772 [email protected] 1 NOTICE This document contains confidential and proprietary information of Thomson Reuters and may be used only by a recipient designated by and for purposes specified by Thomson Reuters. Reproduction of, dissemination of, modifications to, or creation of derivative works from this document, by any means and in any form or manner, is expressly prohibited, except with the prior written permission of Thomson Reuters. Permitted copies of this document must retain all proprietary notices contained in the original. The information in this document is subject to change without prior notice. Always confirm with Thomson Reuters that you are using the most current version of this document. Thomson Reuters is free to modify any of its products and services, in any manner and at any time, notwithstanding the information contained in this document. Certain information, including images, graphics, numerical or textual data pertaining to assets or securities may be included in this document to illustrate different types of products and services of Thomson Reuters. Such information may be fictitious or incomplete and should not be relied upon or considered investment advice. THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR GIVE RISE TO ANY LIABILITY OF THOMSON REUTERS, ITS AFFILIATES OR ITS SUPPLIERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Guide Monthly • Issue #2 (29) • February 2007
    Army G uide monthly # 2 (29) February 2007 GD Awarded Test Vehicle Contract for Four Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles US Marine Corps Announces Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Contracts The United States Gives Weapons to Afghanistan's Army Armoured Personnel Carrier Northrop Grumman to Test Fire Kinetic Energy Interceptor Booster PVI Wins MRAP Test Contract Award Last Laser-Based Firing Simulator Handed Over for the Light Armoured Vehicle RadSpz 93 BAE SYSTEMS Receives Follow-on Contract for New Swedish Artillery System LM Receives $18.6M U.S. Army BCS3 Follow-On Contract Half-track FCS Successfully Completes Experiment and Soldier-testing of Key Technologies Textron Marine & Land Contracted to Build Test Vehicles for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Program Cost Effective Integration Of The Fido Explosives Detection System Additional Heavy Tank Transporters for Australian Army Oshkosh Truck Signs Contract To Provide Medium Tactical Trucks To Egyptian Ministry of Defense Howitzer DRS Technologies Receives $124 M Contract to Produce Infrared Sighting Systems for U.S. Army Combat Vehicles Force Dynamics Announces $67 M U.S. Marine Corps Contract Tetra Tech Joint Venture Wins $62 M Technical Services Contract with U.S. Army Chemical Materials Agency DFNS Announces a First Order from a Leading US Supplier of Armored Buses www.army-guide.com Army Guide Monthly • #2 (29) • February 2007 Defence Industry lives by augmenting the current level of mine and GD Awarded Test Vehicle Contract for Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) protection with a Four Mine Resistant Ambush Protected V-shaped hull and raised chassis. The increased Vehicles survivability performance requirements and production rates are a direct result of theater operational needs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Us Withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Fate of the Mraps
    ZESZYTY NAUKOWE RUCHU STUDENCKIEGO Nr 2 (2014) ISSN 2084-2279 Cdt. Richard Kovács1 Under mentoring of Col. Tomasz Smal, PhD, Assoc. Prof. THE US WITHDRAWAL FROM AFGHANISTAN AND THE FATE OF THE MRAPS Summary: This article describes the problems connected with the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan and focuses on the hardships of transporting the MRAPs from the area of operations. Keywords: military logistics, MRAP, Global War on Terror, bilateral agreement, Afghanistan, IED INTRODUCTION Shortly after 9/11 the US and its allies started so called the Global War on Terror (GWOT), and Afghanistan (among other countries) became a battlefield. The Internation- al Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Operation Enduring Freedom is made up of the coalition of NATO countries, but the biggest contributor to the cause is without doubt the USA. Since 2001, they have deployed most of the soldiers and the equipment to the area. Now the US is considering the withdrawal from the country and is faced with a huge amount of problems. When and how exactly will they leave the country? How can they manage the withdrawal efficiently from the logistic point of view? To better under- stand the significance of these questions, we must take a look into the history of the war and the current situation. 1. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW In the opening stages of the war, the invasion of the country went extremely fast, faster than the intelligence officers at the CIA would predict. At the beginning air strikes and a limited number of ground troops (mostly CIA paramilitary officers and special op- erations forces) with the help of the local anti-taliban militias launched successful cam- paigns against enemy strongholds and captured important cities such as Mazar-i Sharif, Kabul, Kunduz and Kandahar2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle
    Canadian Military History Volume 20 Issue 3 Article 9 2011 The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Ed Storey Canadian Expeditionary Forces Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Recommended Citation Storey, Ed "The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle." Canadian Military History 20, 3 (2011) This Feature is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Storey: Light Armoured Vehicle The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Ed Storey s a military vehicle enthusiast make them cost effective and easier AI was quite excited to see the Abstract: In order to understand the to deploy. article by Frank Maas in Canadian purchase of military vehicles, one must The AVGP series of vehicles Military History dealing with the understand the vehicle and where it falls purchased by Canada in 1976 was in the evolution of vehicle procurement. Canadian Light Armoured Vehicle This article, written in response to an a 10.7 ton, 6 wheeled amphibious (LAV) series of vehicles (vol.20, earlier article in Canadian Military vehicle based on the Swiss Mowag no.2 Spring 2011). I was also keenly History by Frank Maas, examines the Piranha I. Canada bought three interested in the article as my Father chronology and motivations behind versions: the Cougar 76 mm Fire was stationed at CFB Petawawa in the Canadian acquisition of wheeled Support Vehicle, the Grizzly armoured fighting vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Spartan Chassis Awarded ILAV Subcontract by BAE Systems
    1541 Reynolds Rd. Charlotte, MI 48813 P: 517.543.6400 SPARTANMOTORS.COM Spartan Chassis Awarded ILAV Subcontract by BAE Systems November 24, 2014 CHARLOTTE, Mich., Nov. 24, 2014 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Spartan Chassis ("Spartan"), a business unit of Spartan Motors, Inc. (Nasdaq:SPAR), announced today that its Defense and Government operating group has been awarded a subcontract from defense contractor BAE Systems to support the production of 22 International Light Armored Vehicles (ILAVs). The subcontract is the second delivery order against a three year Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract and validates the diversified growth and operational strengths of the Spartan Defense and Government (SDG) business unit. These vehicles perform specialized, mission-critical tasks such as supporting convoy operations, investigating possible improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and additional rapid response needs. Under the terms of the subcontract, Spartan will provide automotive integration, final assembly, coordination of Government inspection and delivery to the Government. Production for the units will begin in February 2015 on Spartan's Charlotte campus with an expected completion of June 2015. "This subcontract is another confirmation that Spartan Chassis maintains the operational excellence and competencies required to execute to the exacting standards of BAE," said Art Ickes, Division President, Specialty Vehicles. "Spartan is pleased to provide major customers like BAE Systems with the highest quality vehicles for these mission critical and often life-saving deployments. We appreciate our ongoing partnership with BAE Systems." Spartan has been awarded multiple subcontract orders for advanced tactical vehicles under the International Light Armored Vehicle (ILAV), Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) and Medium Mine Protected Vehicle (MMPV) programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier Armed Joint EOD Rapid Response Vehicle (JERRV) by Scott R
    Soldier Armed Joint EOD Rapid Response Vehicle (JERRV) By Scott R. Gourley Charles Dease, Project Manager As- Joint service Army/Marine Corps sured Mobility Systems. Before 2003- contract for 122 vehicles in May 2005. lmost two years before the initial 04, “the Army didn’t have any V- “The Cougar JERRV, for Joint ser- Amine resistant ambush protected shaped hulls. This was one of the vices, followed on the heels of the suc- (MRAP) vehicle contracts were award- vehicles that had a V-shaped hull, cessful deployment of the Cougar ed in January 2007, military and indus- along with the Buffalo and RG-31 se- hardened engineering vehicle (HEV) try teams were addressing the needs of ries vehicles. In order to mitigate blast for the USMC into Iraq during late Army and other service warfighters because of the protection that was af- 2004,” said Mark Edwards, executive under a larger “superset” category of forded on the current vehicles that we vice president, business development, “mine protected vehicles.” had as platforms, operational need for Force Protection. “The Cougar is a Purchased for engineer formations statements came about to support en- very scalable platform, which allowed and use in route clearance missions, gineer units. That’s when we came up us to scale up the JERRV protection one representative example of these with the JERRV.” levels to meet the evolving and chang- early mine protected vehicle programs Col. Dease noted that the joint as- ing threats experienced in both Iraq was the Joint explosive ordnance dis- pects of the program were based on and Afghanistan.” posal rapid response vehicle (JERRV), receipt of a Joint service urgent un- Of the initial 122 JERRVs, approxi- or Cougar, built by Force Protection funded need statement, with the ini- mately 38 went to the Marine Corps; Inc.
    [Show full text]