DOCSLIB.ORG

Title 33—Navigation and Navigable Waters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Title 33—Navigation and Navigable Waters (This book contains parts 1 to 124) Part CHAPTER I—Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security 1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS CHAPTER: BMC = Chief Boatswains Mate. CGFR = Coast Guard Federal Register document number. CG = Coast Guard. EM = Electrician’s Mate. LS = Lightship. NC = Flag hoist meaning, ‘‘I am in distress and require immediate assistance.’’ NCG = Call let- ters for any Coast Guard Shore Radio Station. OAN = Aids to Navigation Division. PTP = Training and Procurement. U.S.C.G. = United States Coast Guard. 1 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:56 Sep 12, 2012 Jkt 226132 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Q:\33\33V1.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:56 Sep 12, 2012 Jkt 226132 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Q:\33\33V1.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY EDITORIAL NOTE: Nomenclature changes to Chapter I appear at 70 FR 75734, Dec. 21, 2005. SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL Part Page 1 General provisions.................................................. 7 2 Jurisdiction ............................................................. 29 3 Coast Guard areas, districts, sectors, marine in- spection zones, and Captain of the Port zones ..... 33 4 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Pa- perwork Reduction Act ........................................ 52 5 Coast Guard Auxiliary ............................................ 53 6 Protection and security of vessels, harbors, and waterfront facilities ............................................. 57 8 United States Coast Guard Reserve ........................ 62 13 Decorations, medals, ribbons and similar devices ... 63 17 United States Coast Guard general gift fund .......... 66 19 Waivers of navigation and vessel inspection laws and regulations .................................................... 67 20 Rules of practice, procedure, and evidence for for- mal administrative proceedings of the Coast Guard ................................................................... 70 23 Distinctive markings for Coast Guard vessels and aircraft ................................................................. 92 25 Claims ..................................................................... 94 26 Vessel bridge-to-bridge radiotelephone regulations 105 27 Adjustment of civil monetary penalties for infla- tion ....................................................................... 108 SUBCHAPTER B—PERSONNEL 40 Cadets of the Coast Guard ....................................... 112 45 Enlistment of personnel .......................................... 112 49 Payment of amounts due mentally incompetent Coast Guard personnel ......................................... 113 50 Coast Guard Retiring Review Board ....................... 115 51 Coast Guard Discharge Review Board ..................... 117 3 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:56 Sep 12, 2012 Jkt 226132 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Q:\33\33V1.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) Part Page 52 Board for Correction of Military Records of the Coast Guard .......................................................... 122 53 Coast Guard whistleblower protection .................... 129 54 Allotments from active duty pay for certain sup- port obligations .................................................... 133 55 Child Development Services .................................... 134 SUBCHAPTER C—AIDS TO NAVIGATION 60 [Reserved] 62 United States aids to navigation system ................ 136 64 Marking of structures, sunken vessels and other obstructions ......................................................... 144 66 Private aids to navigation ...................................... 147 67 Aids to navigation on artificial islands and fixed structures ............................................................. 155 70 Interference with or damage to aids to navigation 169 72 Marine information................................................. 170 74 Charges for Coast Guard aids to navigation work ... 173 76 Sale and transfer of aids to navigation equipment 174 SUBCHAPTER D—INTERNATIONAL NAVIGATION RULES Special Note: Application of the 72 COLREGS to territories and possessions ................................... 175 80 COLREGS Demarcation Lines ................................ 176 81 72 COLREGS: Implementing Rules .......................... 192 82 72 COLREGS: Interpretative Rules ......................... 195 SUBCHAPTER E—INLAND NAVIGATION RULES 83 Rules ....................................................................... 196 84 Annex I: Positioning and Technical Details of Lights and Shapes ................................................ 211 85 Annex II: Additional Signals for Fishing Vessels Fishing in Close Proximity .................................. 216 86 Annex III: Technical Details of Sound Signal Ap- pliances ................................................................ 216 87 Annex IV: Distress Signals ...................................... 218 88 Annex V: Pilot Rules ............................................... 219 89 Inland navigation rules: Implementing rules .......... 221 90 Inland rules: interpretative rules ............................ 224 SUBCHAPTER F—VESSEL OPERATING REGULATIONS 95 Operating a vessel while under the influence of al- cohol or a dangerous drug .................................... 225 4 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:56 Sep 12, 2012 Jkt 226132 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Q:\33\33V1.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 Coast Guard, DHS Part Page 96 Rules for the safe operation of vessels and safety management systems ........................................... 227 SUBCHAPTER G—REGATTAS AND MARINE PARADES 100 Safety of life on navigable waters ........................... 241 SUBCHAPTER H—MARITIME SECURITY 101 Maritime security: General ..................................... 318 102 Maritime security: National maritime transpor- tation security [Reserved] 103 Maritime security: Area maritime security ............ 331 104 Maritime security: Vessels ...................................... 335 105 Maritime security: Facilities .................................. 361 106 Marine security: Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) fa- cilities .................................................................. 387 107 National vessel and facility control measures and limited access areas ............................................. 405 SUBCHAPTER I—ANCHORAGES 109 General .................................................................... 410 110 Anchorage regulations............................................ 411 SUBCHAPTER J—BRIDGES 114 General .................................................................... 525 115 Bridge locations and clearances; administrative procedures ............................................................ 527 116 Alteration of unreasonably obstructive bridges ...... 531 117 Drawbridge operation regulations ........................... 536 118 Bridge lighting and other signals ............................ 650 SUBCHAPTER K—SECURITY OF VESSELS 120 Security of passenger vessels .................................. 659 5 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:56 Sep 12, 2012 Jkt 226132 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Q:\33\33V1.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:56 Sep 12, 2012 Jkt 226132 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Q:\33\33V1.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL PART 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.07–100 Summons in lieu of seizure of com- mercial fishing industry vessels. Subpart 1.01—Delegation of Authority Subpart 1.08—Written Warnings by Coast Sec. Guard Boarding Officers 1.01–1 District Commander. 1.01–20 Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. 1.08–1 Applicability. 1.01–30 Captains of the Port. 1.08–5 Procedures. 1.01–40 Delegation to the Vice Commandant. 1.01–50 Delegation to District Commander, Subpart 1.10—Public Availability of Seventeenth Coast Guard District. Information 1.01–60 Delegations for issuance of bridge permits. 1.10–1 Official records and documents. 1.01–70 CERCLA delegations. 1.10–5 Public availability of records and 1.01–80 FWPCA and OPA 90 delegations. documents. 1.01–85 Redelegation. 1.01–90 Commissioned, warrant, and petty Subpart 1.20—Testimony by Coast Guard officers. Personnel and Production of Records in Legal Proceedings Subpart 1.05—Rulemaking 1.20–1 Testimony by Coast Guard personnel 1.05–1 Delegation of rulemaking authority. 1.05–5 Marine Safety Council. and production of records. 1.05–10 Regulatory process overview. 1.05–15 Public participation. Subpart 1.25—Fees and Charges for 1.05–20 Petitions for rulemaking. Certain Records and Services 1.05–25 Public docket. 1.05–30 Advance notice of proposed rule- 1.25–1 Purpose. making (ANPRM). 1.25–30 Exceptions. 1.05–35 Notice of proposed rulemaking 1.25–40 Fees for services for the public. (NPRM). 1.25–45 Special admeasurement services. 1.05–40 Supplemental notice of proposed 1.25–48 Oceanographic research. rulemaking (SNPRM). 1.25–80 Payment of fees, charges or sales. 1.05–45 Interim rule. 1.05–50 Final rule. Subpart 1.26—Charges for Duplicate Med- 1.05–55 Direct final rule. als, and Sales of Personal Property, 1.05–60 Negotiated rulemaking. Equipment or Services and Rentals Subpart 1.07—Enforcement; Civil and 1.26–1 Purpose. Criminal Penalty Proceedings 1.26–5 Replacement of medals. 1.07–1 Purpose. 1.26–10 Sales to Coast Guard Auxiliary. 1.07–5 Definitions. 1.26–15 Sales of nonexcess personal property 1.07–10 Reporting and investigation. and services. 1.07–11 Notice of violation. 1.26–20 Sales to eligible foreign govern- 1.07–15 Hearing Officer.
Recommended publications
  • “Everyday Heroes” a Story About Commercial Fishing Vessel Examiners DIVISION CAPTAINS 2005

    “Everyday Heroes” a Story About Commercial Fishing Vessel Examiners DIVISION CAPTAINS 2005

    t pside PUBLISHED BY 5TH NORTHERN DISTRICT - U.S. COAST GUARD AUXILIARY Vol. 105, No. 1 Spring 2005 in this issue. Cold Weather Activity Around the District “Everyday Heroes” a story about Commercial Fishing Vessel Examiners DIVISION CAPTAINS 2005 DIVISION 1 .......................…………..... Donald W. Merrill DIVISION 2 ...........................….…….... Lewis H. Keenan DIVISION 3 .........................….…...…... Eugene J. Morris USCG Auxiliary DIVISION 4 ............................…….... Harold T. Robinson Fifth Coast Guard District (NR) DIVISION 5 ........................………....... Ralph H. Gregory 1 Washington Avenue DIVISION 6 ...................….....………….... June B. Layton DIVISION 7 ...........................………...... James T. Emery Philadelphia, PA 19147-4393 DIVISION 8 ............................…..……....... Bruce J. Long DIVISION 9 ...............................…….... Martin S. Rusnak DIVISION 10 .......................…….......... Merrill L. Beyer III Editor and Publication Officers DIVISION 11 .................…........…….….... Terry L. Hilbert Melvyn A. Borofsky, DSO-PB, Editor DIVISION 12 .........................……..…..... Oscar D. Bailey 24 Lake Singleton Court, Little Egg Harbor, NJ 08087-1115 DIVISION 13 ..........…..…......… Francis “Buzz” Lombardi (NJ) 609-294-2866 (FL) 352-483-1408 (Cell) 609-618-0470 DIVISION 14 ......................………...……...... Steve Wells email: [email protected] DIVISION 15 ............…............…..……... Ronald VanZile Edna Winans, ADSO-PB (E) DIVISION 16 .......................................
  • The Navigability Concept in the Civil and Common Law: Historical Development, Current Importance, and Some Doctrines That Don't Hold Water

    The Navigability Concept in the Civil and Common Law: Historical Development, Current Importance, and Some Doctrines That Don't Hold Water

    Florida State University Law Review Volume 3 Issue 4 Article 1 Fall 1975 The Navigability Concept in the Civil and Common Law: Historical Development, Current Importance, and Some Doctrines That Don't Hold Water Glenn J. MacGrady Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Admiralty Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Glenn J. MacGrady, The Navigability Concept in the Civil and Common Law: Historical Development, Current Importance, and Some Doctrines That Don't Hold Water, 3 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 511 (1975) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol3/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 3 FALL 1975 NUMBER 4 THE NAVIGABILITY CONCEPT IN THE CIVIL AND COMMON LAW: HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT, CURRENT IMPORTANCE, AND SOME DOCTRINES THAT DON'T HOLD WATER GLENN J. MACGRADY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ---------------------------- . ...... ..... ......... 513 II. ROMAN LAW AND THE CIVIL LAW . ........... 515 A. Pre-Roman Legal Conceptions 515 B. Roman Law . .... .. ... 517 1. Rivers ------------------- 519 a. "Public" v. "Private" Rivers --- 519 b. Ownership of a River and Its Submerged Bed..--- 522 c. N avigable R ivers ..........................................- 528 2. Ownership of the Foreshore 530 C. Civil Law Countries: Spain and France--------- ------------- 534 1. Spanish Law----------- 536 2. French Law ----------------------------------------------------------------542 III. ENGLISH COMMON LAw ANTECEDENTS OF AMERICAN DOCTRINE -- --------------- 545 A.
  • The Conservation Action Plan the Ganges River Dolphin

    The Conservation Action Plan the Ganges River Dolphin

    THE CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE GANGES RIVER DOLPHIN 2010-2020 National Ganga River Basin Authority Ministry of Environment & Forests Government of India Prepared by R. K. Sinha, S. Behera and B. C. Choudhary 2 MINISTER’S FOREWORD I am pleased to introduce the Conservation Action Plan for the Ganges river dolphin (Platanista gangetica gangetica) in the Ganga river basin. The Gangetic Dolphin is one of the last three surviving river dolphin species and we have declared it India's National Aquatic Animal. Its conservation is crucial to the welfare of the Ganga river ecosystem. Just as the Tiger represents the health of the forest and the Snow Leopard represents the health of the mountainous regions, the presence of the Dolphin in a river system signals its good health and biodiversity. This Plan has several important features that will ensure the existence of healthy populations of the Gangetic dolphin in the Ganga river system. First, this action plan proposes a set of detailed surveys to assess the population of the dolphin and the threats it faces. Second, immediate actions for dolphin conservation, such as the creation of protected areas and the restoration of degraded ecosystems, are detailed. Third, community involvement and the mitigation of human-dolphin conflict are proposed as methods that will ensure the long-term survival of the dolphin in the rivers of India. This Action Plan will aid in their conservation and reduce the threats that the Ganges river dolphin faces today. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. R. K. Sinha , Dr. S. K. Behera and Dr.
  • Optimizing Dredge-And-Dump Activities for River Navigability Using a Hydro-Morphodynamic Model

    Optimizing Dredge-And-Dump Activities for River Navigability Using a Hydro-Morphodynamic Model

    Water 2015, 7, 3943-3962; doi:10.3390/w7073943 OPEN ACCESS water ISSN 2073-4441 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Article Optimizing Dredge-and-Dump Activities for River Navigability Using a Hydro-Morphodynamic Model Andries J. Paarlberg 1, Massimo Guerrero 2,*, Fredrik Huthoff 1 and Mariano Re 3 1 HKV Consultants, Lelystad 8232, The Netherlands; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.J.P.); [email protected] (F.H.) 2 Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, Bologna 40136, Italy 3 National Institute for Water (INA), Ezeiza, Buenos Aires 1804, Argentina; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-051-2090519. Academic Editor: Markus Disse Received: 9 May 2015 / Accepted: 8 July 2015 / Published: 17 July 2015 Abstract: Worldwide, significant dredging activities of riverbed sediment are employed to ensure that freight transportation on rivers can continue year-round. Imbalances of sediment budget may produce relevant impacts regarding river morphology and related environmental services. This study shows that hydro-morphodynamic modeling tools can be used to optimize dredge-and-dump activities and, at the same time, mitigate problems deriving from these activities in rivers. As a case study, we focused on dredging activities on the Lower Parana River, Argentina. Navigation on this river is of crucial importance to the economies of the bordering countries, hence, each year significant dredging activities are employed. To estimate dredging loads under different strategies, a 25 km river reach of the Parana River was modeled using the Delft3D-modelling suite by Deltares.
  • NRT Abandoned Vessel Authorities and Best Practices Guidance 2020

    NRT Abandoned Vessel Authorities and Best Practices Guidance 2020

    ABANDONED VESSEL AUTHORITIES AND BEST PRACTICES GUIDANCE 2020 UPDATE VERSION 10 This page intentionally left blank ii ABANDONED VESSEL AUTHORITIES AND BEST PRACTICES GUIDANCE Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... vi How to Use This Guidance ....................................................................................................................... vii Section 1.0 Definition of Terms .................................................................................................................. 1 Section 2.0 Background and Purpose ........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Considerations and Assumptions ..................................................................................................... 6 Section 3.0 Initial Assessment .................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
  • Pleasure Boating and Admiralty: Erie at Sea' Preble Stolz*

    Pleasure Boating and Admiralty: Erie at Sea' Preble Stolz*

    California Law Review VoL. 51 OCTOBER 1963 No. 4 Pleasure Boating and Admiralty: Erie at Sea' Preble Stolz* P LEASURE BOATING is basically a new phenomenon, the product of a technology that can produce small boats at modest cost and of an economy that puts such craft within the means of almost everyone.' The risks generated by this development create new legal problems. New legal problems are typically solved first, and often finally, by extension of com- mon law doctrines in the state courts. Legislative regulation and any solu- tion at the federal level are exceptional and usually come into play only as a later stage of public response.2 There is no obvious reason why our legal system should react differ- ently to the new problems presented by pleasure boating. Small boats fall easily into the class of personal property. The normal rules of sales and security interests would seem capable of extension to small boats without difficulty. The same should be true of the rules relating to the operation of pleasure boats and particularly to the liability for breach of the duty to take reasonable care for the safety of others. One would expect, therefore, that the legal problems of pleasure boating would be met with the typical response: adaptation of the common law at the state level. Unhappily this is not likely to happen. Pleasure boating has the mis- fortune of presenting basic issues in an already complex problem of fed- t I am grateful to Professor Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. for reading the manuscript in nearly final form, and to Professor Ronan E.
  • GLPA Newsletter Fall 2011 Issue Published by the Great Lakes Chapter of the United States Coast Guard Academy Parents’ Association in August, January, and May

    GLPA Newsletter Fall 2011 Issue Published by the Great Lakes Chapter of the United States Coast Guard Academy Parents’ Association in August, January, and May

    GLPA Newsletter Fall 2011 Issue Published by the Great Lakes Chapter of the United States Coast Guard Academy Parents’ Association in August, January, and May. 2011-12 Chapter Officers From the Presidents Parents’ Weekend The Coast Guard has a time Parents’ Weekend is Friday, Presidents honored ceremony when a new 14 Oct through Sunday, 16 Oct. Bruce & Peg Talbot (Erin ‘13) skipper takes command of a ship. There is an excellent page on the [email protected] We attended our first Change of Academy website at http:// [email protected] Command ceremony for the Cutter www.uscga.edu/display.aspx? MACKINAW this August during id=18125. There you can find the Vice Presidents the Coast Guard Festival. A very schedule for the weekend, campus Ed & Sheri Bugyis (Stephanie formal affair, the principles all map, parking guidance, and even ‘13) dressed in their starched white on-line registration for the various [email protected] uniforms. events. Be sure to check it out. The Great Lakes Chapter This is a great time to visit Secretary change of command is a much less your cadet and the Academy. If Donna O’Brien (Kevin ‘12) formal affair with most of the prin- you can, I urge you to go every [email protected] ciples dressed in a comfy top and year, but it’s particularly good to shorts. Despite the relaxed dress go for the Swab year and the Treasurer code, the Great Lakes Chapter Firstie year. During the Swab year, Carlene Smith (Kendra ‘14) does have a tradition when the it will likely be the first good [email protected] new president (in this year’s case chance to spend time with your co-presidents) takes over.
  • On the Future Navigability of Arctic Sea Routes High-Resolution Projections

    On the Future Navigability of Arctic Sea Routes High-Resolution Projections

    Marine Policy ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎ Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol On the future navigability of Arctic sea routes: High-resolution projections of the Arctic Ocean and sea ice Yevgeny Aksenov a,n, Ekaterina E. Popova a, Andrew Yool a, A.J. George Nurser a, Timothy D. Williams b, Laurent Bertino b, Jon Bergh b a National Oceanography Centre, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK b Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen N-5006, Norway article info abstract Article history: The rapid Arctic summer sea ice reduction in the last decade has lead to debates in the maritime in- Received 29 October 2015 dustries on the possibility of an increase in cargo transportation in the region. Average sailing times on Received in revised form the North Sea Route along the Siberian Coast have fallen from 20 days in the 1990s to 11 days in 2012– 31 December 2015 2013, attributed to easing sea ice conditions along the Siberian coast. However, the economic risk of Accepted 31 December 2015 exploiting the Arctic shipping routes is substantial. Here a detailed high-resolution projection of ocean and sea ice to the end of the 21st century forced with the RCP8.5 IPCC emission scenario is used to Keywords: examine navigability of the Arctic sea routes. In summer, opening of large areas of the Arctic Ocean Arctic Ocean previously covered by pack ice to the wind and surface waves leads to Arctic pack ice cover evolving into Arctic shipping routes the Marginal Ice Zone. The emerging state of the Arctic Ocean features more fragmented thinner sea ice, CO emission scenarios 2 stronger winds, ocean currents and waves.
  • A Review of the Navigability Modeling for Inland Waterways

    A Review of the Navigability Modeling for Inland Waterways

    E - proceedings of the 36 th IAHR World Congress 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands A REVIEW OF THE NAVI GABILITY MODELING FO R INLAND WATERWAYS ANDERSON L. FRIGO ( 1) , TOBIAS B. BLENINGER (2 ) (1) Federal University of Parana , Curitiba , Brazil , [email protected] (2) Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil, [email protected] ABSTRACT Among all Brazilian waterways the Paraguay River highlights as one of the most important. It is approximately 1 30 0 kilometers long and links the interior of South Amer ica to the deep - water ports in Argentina and Uruguay, enabling the efficient flow of raw material as grain and ore. Nevertheless, the potential of the Paraguay River waterway is not fully explored . One of the main factors contributing to this scenario is t he lack of operational methodologies and field surveys. The navigation is performed using only bathymetric data and the expertise of the sailors, which is not consistent with modern, competitive and safe waterways. Therefore, Brazilian government started a project to revitalize the Paraguay waterway, comprising the river and its most important tributaries. This study presents the initial investigation to assess the navigability of the Paraguay River. Initially previous works related to hydrodynamic modeling and operational methodologies used worldwide were analyzed. It was identified that there is a lack of researches on this topic, sparse on specific problems and the methodologies used are often concepts of marine navigation and approach channels. Initial s urveys for Paraguay River are described and discussed. Large - scale field measurements are necessary to determine the navigation potential of the river, hence longitudinal bathymetry, velocity profile, sediment sampling, hydrologic parameters of the watersh ed and vessel characteristics were measured.
  • Management of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Maritime Transportation System

    Management of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Maritime Transportation System

    Canada-United States Law Journal Volume 42 Issue 1 Article 13 2018 Management of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Maritime Transportation System Mike Piskur Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj Part of the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Mike Piskur, Management of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Maritime Transportation System, 42 Can.-U.S. L.J. 228 (2018) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj/vol42/iss1/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canada-United States Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 228 CANADA-UNITED STATES LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 42, 2018] MANAGEMENT OF THE GREAT LAKES-ST. LAWRENCE MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Mike Piskur† ABSTRACT: The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Maritime Transportation System (“MTS”) bears critical importance to the economic competitiveness of Canada and the United States (“US”). Maritime transportation comprises both a major economic driver and job creator for both countries. As a cost-effective and highly efficient means of transporting raw materials and finished products to market, the MTS is essential to agricultural, mining, and manufacturing supply chains that frequently stretch across the US-Canada border and beyond. Yet management of the MTS is fragmented, with responsibility for various system components scattered across numerous federal agencies in both the US and Canada. This fragmentation results in a dearth of transparency, confusing and disjointed governmental authority, higher user costs, barriers to establishing new markets, and overall reduced system competitiveness.
  • Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment

    Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment

    Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 67668-SAS Report No. 67668-SAS Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized GANGES STRATEGIC BASIN ASSESSMENT: A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks b Report No. 67668-SAS Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks World Bank South Asia Regional Report The World Bank Washington, DC iii GANGES STRATEGIC BASIN ASSESSMENT: A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks Disclaimer: © 2014 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved 1 2 3 4 14 13 12 11 This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law.
  • GLPA Newsletter Summer 2013 Issue Published by the Great Lakes Chapter of the United States Coast Guard Academy Parents’ Association in August, January, and May

    GLPA Newsletter Summer 2013 Issue Published by the Great Lakes Chapter of the United States Coast Guard Academy Parents’ Association in August, January, and May

    GLPA Newsletter Summer 2013 Issue Published by the Great Lakes Chapter of the United States Coast Guard Academy Parents’ Association in August, January, and May. 2012-13 Chapter Officers President’s Message R-Day. Our chapter had an incredibly successful sign-up for We would like to begin the this year: We registered 19 Presidents Presidents letter with a chorus of families, consisting of 11 men and Tom & Sue Smith (Kari ‘16) welcomes for the 19 Great Lakes 8 women. Because of recruiting [email protected] members of the class of 2017. We efforts at out table on R-Day, we wish them and all our USCGA were able to extend our family to Vice Presidents cadets best wishes for a strong and the states of Missouri and Scot Sutschek (Kyle ‘15) successful academic year. We Nebraska, which means we now [email protected] also extend hearty congratulations cover 8 States. We extend a BIG for a job well done to the 17 newly welcome to those who joined us commissioned ensigns from the Secretary this year and thanks to those who Great class of 2013. We hope to VACANT helped our Great Lakes family hear soon about all their grow! Just recently, we shared endeavors. Treasurer some of the stories of swab We wish to extend a special thank Carlene Smith (Kendra ‘14) summer at our latest meeting in you to Peg and Bruce Talbot for [email protected] August. We again hope all the their 2 years as Co-Presidents and now 4/C cadets have a successful their tireless work on behalf of the start to their first Academic term.