DOCSLIB.ORG

Growing up Getting Competitive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Growing up Getting Competitive TORONTO EDITION FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 2013 Vol. 17 • No. 15 Tall building design guidelines update Convention venue needed downtown GROWING UP GETTING By Jake Tobin Garrett COMPETITIVE Anyone watching the city’s skyline over the past 10 years By John Michael McGrath would have noticed it has gotten both increasingly crowded and taller. Th is bourgeoning tall building environment brings new design challenges and opportunities that the city hopes Toronto needs a new, large, convention space according to to address in an update to its tall building design guidelines, respected people in the industry—and it needs one downtown, which were adopted at planning and growth management not at Exhibition Place. committee yesterday. Toronto “absolutely” needs a newer, larger convention “It’s been an incredible laboratory for studying tall buildings space says Lyle Hall, managing director at HLT Advisory— because we’re building more tall buildings than most cities in “unequivocally.” Hall is one of the leading consultants in the the world,” city urban design director Robert Freedman told hotel and tourism industry, and his research informed city NRU. “Th ere’s been a huge amount of change and certainly a manager Joe Pennachetti’s recent report. Th e key issue, says huge number of towers added to the city as these guidelines Hall, is Toronto’s lack of “contiguous space,” meaning a single have evolved.” large exhibit space for the large events that have the greatest Since the guidelines were put in place in 2006, the city has economic impact. received 290 tall building applications, he said, adding that “It’s virtually impossible to rent the Metro Toronto many of those were for multiple towers, so the actual number Convention Centre to one customer to use both sides,” is larger. Hall told NRU this week. While the MTCC has a favorable “Tall buildings have civic obligations,” chief planner downtown location and a large volume of exhibition space, Jennifer Keesmaat told committee members. Th e guidelines the fact that it was constructed in two halves, with the south are meant to ensure more and better open spaces and wider building being added in the 1990s, makes it unattractive for sidewalks to create a stronger public realm. the largest events. Both the tall building environment and the guidelines On Monday Pennachetti released his long-awaited report have essentially evolved together, Freedman told NRU, with on the potential benefi ts of a casino in the City of Toronto. the guidelines revised as the city learns more about its tall One key element of his report is the assertion that Toronto is buildings. Th e update also consolidates two CONTINUED PAGE 3 > lagging behind other cities in North America CONTINUED PAGE 4 > INSIDE Economics Matters High Park high Come fl y with me On target ■ demographics ■ real estate markets New proposal brings Porter pitches new City exceeds CO2 ■ construction economics ■ expert testimony community concerns planes goals ■ planning impacts ■ forecasting > > > p 2 p 5 p 8 416-641-9500 1-877-953-9948 [email protected] altusgroup.com 2 CITY OF TORONTO EDITION FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 2013 UPCOMING High Park going higher? DATES COMMUNITY STIRRED UP APRIL 15 By Jake Tobin Garrett Executive Committee, 9:30 a.m., committee room 1 APRIL 17 Th e area on the north side of High Park Community Development and Recreation has been a hotbed of development activity Committee, 9:30 a.m., committee room 1 lately—many of it coming up against steep APRIL 22 Economic Development Committee, 9:30 opposition from residents as they grapple a.m., committee room 1 with the frequency of new proposals in a Parks and Environment Committee, 9:30 relatively small area. a.m., committee room 2 A recent proposal, Grenadier Square, APRIL 23 which proposes two 31-storey towers and Executive Committee, 9:30 a.m., committee room 1 the demolition of 16 rental townhouse units, APRIL 29 is already drawing concern from neigh- Board of Health, 1:00 p.m., committee room 1 bours. If built as proposed, the towers would MAY 1 be some of the tallest in the area. Budget Committee, 9:30 a.m., committee room 1 Ward councillor Sarah Doucette said MAY 2 she “defi nitely” feels an increasing pressure Toronto Preservation Board, 2:00 p.m., from residents because of the fl urry of committee room 2 development applications in the area. MAY 7-8 Council, 9:30 a.m., council chambers “Suddenly we are being inundated with development,” she told NRU. “Of course MAY 10 + STEELE/IBI ARCHITECTS IMAGE: PAGE Aboriginal Affairs Committee, 9:30 a.m., people are going to be concerned and of Proposed Grenadier Square redevelopment tower committee room 1 course people are going to be scared.” MAY 13 “Certainly we’re getting that impression Government Management Committee, “Th e thing that has happened with this 9:30 a.m., committee room 1 as well,” Etobicoke York district community development—which has not happened MAY 14 planning east section manager Lou with any others—is people have been Etobicoke York Community Council, 9:30 Moretto told NRU regarding a heightened a.m., Etobicoke Civic Centre worked up thinking that they’ve missed level of anxiety amongst residents. “Th e the chance to speak,” she said. North York Community Council, 9:30 a.m., North York Civic Centre area has been quiet for awhile and all of a In a March 28 letter to residents, Scarborough Community Council, 9:30 sudden there seems to be a lot of interest Doucette attempted to dispel some of this a.m., Scarborough Civic Centre in terms of development activity.” concern. However, she also noted her own Doucette said she’s been trying to get apprehension about the proposal. She told ahead of the game by working proactively NRU she thinks the towers could come to keep residents from panicking when down in height. CITY OF TORONTO EDITION they see that a development application Th e site, located at 51-77 Quebec Avenue has been fi led. and 40-66 High Park CONTINUED PAGE 6 > Ian A.R. Graham, Publisher John Michael McGrath SALES/SUBSCRIPTIONS NRU City of Toronto Edition NRU Publishing Inc. Billings Department [email protected] Municipal Affairs Reporter [email protected] is not to be redistributed Editorial Offi ce 46 Old Bridle Path [email protected] without the written consent 26 Soho Street, Suite 330 Toronto, ON M4T 1A7 Lynn Morrow, Editor Annual subscription rate is of the publisher. Toronto, ON M5T 1Z7 Tel: 416.440.0073 [email protected] Jeff Payette, Design/Layout $369 +HST (ON). Tel: 416.260.1304 Fax: 416.440.0074 [email protected] NRU City of Toronto Edition Fax: 416.979.2707 ISSN 1918-753X Jake Tobin Garrett Complimentary trial is published 50 times a Planning Reporter Irena Kohn subscriptions are available. year by email by NRU [email protected] Sales and Circulation [email protected] Publishing Inc. Advertising rates available Twitter @nrupublishing upon request. CITY OF TORONTO GREA TER TORONTO VANCOUVER 3 CITY OF TORONTO EDITION FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 2013 GROWING UP CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 previously existing guidelines—the citywide guidelines and in the update. the downtown-specifi c guidelines. Th e guidelines suggest looking at the setbacks fi rst “because Th at proliferation of tall buildings means the city is paying that gives you the adequate spacing between neighbouring more attention to the surrounding context. Based on feedback towers, whether existing or future, and then look at what kind from the city’s urban design review panel, Freedman said the of a fl oor plate—what sized tower—you can get,” he said. updated guidelines include requests for documents showing Some in the industry have expressed concern over how the the context of proposed tall building developments. guidelines have been applied throughout time, questioning Now the guidelines better address the cumulative eff ect of whether they are treated more as regulations. towers going into areas that are already rich with existing or Quadrangle Architects principal Les Klein said that, proposed tall buildings. Even though the application may be while the overall intent of the guidelines was good, their main for a single tower in these areas, it’s clearly important to know concern was in the application of the guidelines themselves. “what’s the cumulative eff ect in terms of shadowing, in terms “Our experience has been that the starting off position is of wind, in terms of sky view, privacy—all of those issues,” he that these are not guidelines, these are standards,” he told said. NRU. Urban design review panel vice-chair and Diamond Schmitt “When the intent of a guideline is to generally guide Architects principal Michael Leckman said the more that is direction of development, it implies an understanding that known about the surrounding context of a development— each site is unique in its context. When you apply guidelines both existing and proposed buildings—the better. as though they are rigid, absolute, minimum standards that “Being able to see [developments] only piecemeal will must be met in all sites, that actually negates the whole notion deliver, in large part, a lot of the environment we’re getting of guidelines.” right now. Which is rarely as well coordinated visually and He didn’t think that the updated guidelines addressed that socially and from a public realm point of view as it should be,” issue. “Th ey continue to be called guidelines, but there’s no he said. guarantee that that’s how they will be applied,” Klein said. Aside from just the sheer number of tall buildings going up Th is echoes a concern that the development industry had, in the city, one change in tall building design that the city has which was that sometimes city planners “treat [the guidelines] been dealing with lately is proposals for super tall buildings of as gospel,” Building Industry and Land Development up to 80-storeys.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 153-185 Eastern Avenue, City of Toronto (Former Dominion Wheel and Foundries Company) B80086 No
    HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 153-185 Eastern Avenue, City of Toronto (Former Dominion Wheel and Foundries Company) B80086 No. 153 Eastern Avenue B81484 No. 169 Eastern Avenue B80102 No. 171 Eastern Avenue B80129 No. 185 Eastern Avenue Site Plan, 2021 (SBA) Prepared for Infrastructure Ontario (IO) FINAL June 24th 2021 Client: Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation 1 Dundas Street West, Suite 2000 Toronto ON M5G 1Z3 Authors: Jane Burgess, OAA, CAHP, MRAIC, APT Stevens Burgess Architects Ltd. 204-120 Carlton Street Toronto ON M5A 4K2 [email protected] 416-961-5690 Julia Rady, PhD Stevens Burgess Architects Ltd. 204-120 Carlton Street Toronto ON M5A 4K2 [email protected] 416-961-5690 Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) 153-185 Eastern Avenue, Toronto Table of Contents Executive Summary Confirmation of Ministry or Prescribed Public Body Review and Acceptance of Recommendations 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value.................................................................................................11 3. Assessment of Existing Conditions...................................................................................................... 14 4. Description and Purpose of Proposed Activity ................................................................................... 18 5. Impact Assessment ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Connections: Urban Forestry and Toronto's West
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Érudit Article "Constructing connections: urban forestry and Toronto’s West Don Lands revitalization" Paul L. Nichols Environnement Urbain / Urban Environment, vol. 3, 2009, p. 83-93. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/037602ar DOI: 10.7202/037602ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 12 février 2017 04:38 Dossier thématique Urbanisme et développement durable Urban planning and sustainable development Special Issue CONSTRUCTING CONNECTIONS: URBAN FORESTRY AND TORONTO’S WEST DON LANDS REVITALIZATION Paul L. NICHOLS RÉSUMÉ Les West Don Lands ont joué un rôle de premier plan dans l’histoire de Toronto. Du milieu du dix-neuvième siècle jusqu’au milieu du vingtième siècle cette zone est connue comme centre industriel. Aujourd’hui, force est de constater que le quartier subit les conséquences négatives de la désindustrialisation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 AR Summary 3.15 Waterfront Toronto
    Waterfront Toronto 2018 Value-for-Money Audit Why We Did This Audit Why It Matters • Waterfront Toronto was created under provincial legislation— • Land in Toronto’s waterfront is owned by public and private the Toronto Revitalization Corporation Act, 2002—to oversee interests. Successful revitalization depends on a co-ordinated and lead the revitalization of Toronto’s waterfront. Our Office and well-planned approach. has not previously audited Waterfront Toronto. • Federal, provincial and municipal governments committed • There is strong public interest in the revitalization of Toronto’s $1.5 billion in 2002 for waterfront revitalization and waterfront. $1.25 billion in 2018 for Port Lands flood protection. • Planning for large real-estate development while balancing the • Waterfront Toronto’s Quayside project with Sidewalk Labs interests of three levels of government creates complexity and raises concerns in areas including digital governance (for risks in areas such as project selection, project management example, data security and privacy) that will significantly and the procurement of developers and partners. impact the public. What We Found Mandate • Waterfront Toronto was not given the authority to ensure that the revitalization of Toronto’s waterfront is done right. As a result, the development of waterfront lands has continued to be largely driven by historical practices, existing bylaws, and other regulations governing commercial and residential development. • Waterfront Toronto has directly developed only 5% (55 acres) of the publicly owned developable waterfront land and provided funding to other organizations for revitalization of another 14% (151 acres) since its inception in 2002. • Other waterfront development entities in other cities were given greater authority than what Waterfront Toronto had regarding restriction of building heights, creation of large public spaces and public access to the water’s edge, and the right to expropriate in cases where the intended use was not consistent with overall revitalization plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line
    EX9.1 Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line As directed by City Council in April 2019, City and TTC staff have assessed the Province’s proposed Ontario Line. The details of this assessment are provided in this attachment. 1. Project Summary 1.1. Project Description The Ontario Line was included as part of the 2019 Ontario Budget1 as a transit project that will cover similar study areas as the Relief Line South and North, as well as a western extension. The proposed project is a 15.5-kilometre higher-order transit line with 15 stations, connecting from Exhibition GO station to Line 5 at Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, near the Science Centre station, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Ontario Line Proposal (source: Metrolinx IBC) Since April 2019, technical working groups comprising staff from the City, TTC, Metrolinx, Infrastructure Ontario and the Ministry of Transportation met regularly to understand alignment and station location options being considered for the Ontario 1 http://budget.ontario.ca/2019/contents.html Attachment 4 - Assessment of Ontario Line Page 1 of 20 Line. Discussions also considered fleet requirements, infrastructure design criteria, and travel demand modelling. Metrolinx prepared an Initial Business Case (IBC) that was publicly posted on July 25, 2019.2 The IBC compared the Ontario Line and Relief Line South projects against a Business As Usual scenario. The general findings by Metrolinx were that "both Relief Line South and Ontario Line offer significant improvements compared to a Business As Usual scenario, generating $3.4 billion and $7.4 billion worth of economic benefits, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Dynamic and Diverse Communities
    3 (1) PUBLIC REALM IN THE EAST BAYFRONT (2) PUBLIC REALM ALONG THE DON ROADWAY (3) 20 NIAGARA STREET, KING-SPADINA (4) NATIONAL TRADE CENTRE AT EXHIBITION PLACE (5) RESTORED QUEENS QUAY TERMINAL BUILDING (6) MIMICO PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 1 4 (7) VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE PARK 5 6 2 7 D) CREATING DYNAMIC AND DIVERSE NEW COMMUNITIES The fourth and final principle of the Plan is focused on the creation of dynamic and D21_A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE WEST DON LANDS diverse waterfront communities – unique places of beauty, quality and opportunity for With the construction of the flood protection berm and the naturalization The National Trade Centre will continue to function as a magnet to attract all citizens. New waterfront communities will be acclaimed for their high degree of social, of the mouth of the Don River, the West Don Lands will be redeveloped new businesses and support facilities. Synergies may also be created by economic, natural and environmental health and cultural vibrancy, which collectively will into diverse mixed-use communities. These communities will capitalize the presence of the new media businesses of Liberty Village. on their strategic downtown location, the synergy created by the simulta- contribute to the long-term sustainability of the area and the entire city. The following The remade Exhibition Place will feature a world-class public open neous development of the Port Lands and their historic roots as part of the “Big Moves” implement this principle: plaza capable of hosting large gatherings and festivals. original town of York, as well as the Don River’s new environmental health.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Don River West Lower Don River West BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Lower Don River West Environmental Study Report Remedial Flood Protection Project BIBLIOGRAPHY Acres & Associated-July 1996, Scoping and Sensitivity Analysis on Flood Protection Options for West Don Lands Site, prepared for ORC. Acres Consulting Services Limited, March 1983, Keating Channel Environmental Assessment, Main Report. Acres Consulting, March 1983, Keating Channel Environmental Assessment Appendix F – Economic Studies. Acres International, March 2004, LDRW Remedial Flood Protection Works Geoenvironmental Information Gap Analysis West Bank – Draft. Agra Earth & Environmental, June 10, 1996, Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Restoration of the East Bank of the Don River between Lakeshore Boulevard and the CNR Bridge. Angus Environmental Ltd., March 1995, 1995 Assessment of the Environmental Data for the Ataratiri Lands prepared for: Waterfront Regeneration Trust. Archaeological Resource Management Unit, TRCA, January 2004, Draft Cultural Heritage Study for the Environmental Assessment for the Naturalization & Flood Protection for the Lower Don River. Archaeological Services Inc., April 2004, Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of the East Bayfront, West Donlands and Portlands Areas, City of Toronto. Barrett, Suzanne, James Flagal, Beth Jefferson, Karlk Konze and Ed Mickiewicz, March 1990, Environmental Audit of the Port Industrial Lands and East Bayfront, Natural Heritage, Second Draft. Beak Consultants Ltd and Raven Beck Environmental Ltd., April 1994, Lower Don Lands Site Characterization and Remedial Options Study. C.K. Hurst, April 1978, Dredging and Disposal of Dredged Material from the Keating Channel, Toronto. CH2M Hill, MacViro, July 2003, City of Toronto, Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan, Combine System Sewershed Final Report. City of Toronto, Bring Back the Don, www.toronto.ca/don. City of Toronto, Obtained 10/16/03, Sustainability and Council’s Strategic Plan, from: www.city.toronto.on.ca/sustainability/strategic_plan.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • 923466Magazine1final
    www.globalvillagefestival.ca Global Village Festival 2015 Publisher: Silk Road Publishing Founder: Steve Moghadam General Manager: Elly Achack Production Manager: Bahareh Nouri Team: Mike Mahmoudian, Sheri Chahidi, Parviz Achak, Eva Okati, Alexander Fairlie Jennifer Berry, Tony Berry Phone: 416-500-0007 Email: offi[email protected] Web: www.GlobalVillageFestival.ca Front Cover Photo Credit: © Kone | Dreamstime.com - Toronto Skyline At Night Photo Contents 08 Greater Toronto Area 49 Recreation in Toronto 78 Toronto sports 11 History of Toronto 51 Transportation in Toronto 88 List of sports teams in Toronto 16 Municipal government of Toronto 56 Public transportation in Toronto 90 List of museums in Toronto 19 Geography of Toronto 58 Economy of Toronto 92 Hotels in Toronto 22 History of neighbourhoods in Toronto 61 Toronto Purchase 94 List of neighbourhoods in Toronto 26 Demographics of Toronto 62 Public services in Toronto 97 List of Toronto parks 31 Architecture of Toronto 63 Lake Ontario 99 List of shopping malls in Toronto 36 Culture in Toronto 67 York, Upper Canada 42 Tourism in Toronto 71 Sister cities of Toronto 45 Education in Toronto 73 Annual events in Toronto 48 Health in Toronto 74 Media in Toronto 3 www.globalvillagefestival.ca The Hon. Yonah Martin SENATE SÉNAT L’hon Yonah Martin CANADA August 2015 The Senate of Canada Le Sénat du Canada Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A4 K1A 0A4 August 8, 2015 Greetings from the Honourable Yonah Martin Greetings from Senator Victor Oh On behalf of the Senate of Canada, sincere greetings to all of the organizers and participants of the I am pleased to extend my warmest greetings to everyone attending the 2015 North York 2015 North York Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway to the Port Lands Fact Sheet
    BANNER IMAGE COURTESY OF WATERFRONT TORONTO FACT SHEET GATEWAY TO THE PORT LANDS VILLIERS ISLAND PRECINCT, TORONTO GEOGRAPHY Downtown Toronto’s Eastern Waterfront (a 30-minute walk from Union Station) SITE AREA 88 acres (54 developable, 34 water’s edge parks and public spaces) DEVELOPMENT TYPE Mixed-use (residential, office, retail) NEW BUILDINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IMAGE COURTESY OF WATERFRONT TORONTO Tallest buildings ranging from 26 to 29 Making of an Island storeys Abutting the future location of Google’s planned “Smart City” (Sidewalk Toronto), Villiers Island will be the first area in the Port TIMELINE (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) Lands to undergo redevelopment. The existing industrial port will Infrastructure in place by 2024; ongoing be transformed into a connected and complete mixed-use island development and build-out to 2040 community. DEVELOPERS Waterfront Toronto & private-sector development partners Partnership. Performance. AVISON YOUNG Partnership. Performance. GATEWAY TO THE PORT LANDS – VILLIERS ISLAND PRECINCT, TORONTO FACT SHEET TIME TO RENEW TORONTO’S PORT LANDS With developable land in short supply, the Port Lands, at more than 800 acres, offers vast potential to provide relief to Toronto’s perpetually crowded downtown. The Villiers Island Precinct (formerly referred to as Cousins Quay) is planned to be a complete mixed-use waterfront community – the first redevelopment venture into the Port Lands. The creation of an island through flood protection measures (the naturalization of the mouth of the Don River) will establish a mixed-use community surrounded by parks and naturalized spaces where the river flows into Lake Ontario. TORONTO FINANCIAL CORE QUAYSIDE VILLIERS ISLAND PRECINCT PORT LANDS EAST BAYFRONT WEST DON LANDS EAST HARBOUR » Villiers Island Precinct Plan was instated in September 2017 to guide the development of the new island community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Wise Giving™ of CANADA About This Report
    RONTO ONE OF COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS The Art of Wise Giving™ OF CANADA About This Report About the Toronto Foundation Established in 1981, the Toronto Foundation is one of 191 Community Foundations in Canada. We are a leading independent charitable foundation that connects philanthropy to community needs and opportunities. Our individual and family Fundholders support causes they care about in Toronto and across Canada, through grants to any registered Canadian charity. We currently have more than 500 active Funds, including endowments and assets under administration of more than $300 million. A growing number of Torontonians support the Vital Toronto Fund, our community endowment that helps mobilize people and resources to tackle community challenges in innovative and inspiring ways. To find out more, please visitwww.torontofoundation.ca About the Report The Foundation partners with many researchers to produce the Toronto’s Vital Signs® Report. The Report is compiled from current statistics and studies, identifying progress we should be proud of and challenges that need to be addressed. It is a consolidated snapshot of the trends and issues affecting the quality of life in our city and each of the interconnected issue areas is critical to the wellbeing of Toronto and its residents. Citations at the end of the Report, and live web links throughout, will take you directly to the sources used in this year’s Report. The Report aims to inspire civic engagement and provide focus for public debate. It is used by residents, businesses, community organizations, universities and colleges, and government departments. In addition, the Report is a model now being used for strategic planning by cities around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • North East Quadrant to Fergy Brown Park
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Proposed renaming of Eglinton Flats Park – North East Quadrant to Fergy Brown Park Date: June 21, 2007 To: Etobicoke York Community Council From: General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Wards: Ward 11 – York South-Weston Reference Number: SUMMARY This report seeks Council approval to rename Eglinton Flats Park – North East Quadrant, to Fergy Brown Park. Parks, Forestry & Recreation staff have exercised due diligence in ensuring that all criteria in the Naming and Renaming Policy has been met and recommends the renaming of the Eglinton Flats Park – North East Quadrant, to Fergy Brown Park. RECOMMENDATIONS The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that the Etobicoke Community Council approve the renaming of Eglinton Flats Park – North East Quadrant, located at 101 Emmett Avenue at the corner of Eglinton Avenue and Jane Street to Fergy Brown Park. Financial Impact There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report other than replacing the park sign where appropriate. Funds are available within the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division’s 2007 approved operating budget. Staff report for action on Renaming of Eglinton Flats Park – North East Quadrant, to Fergy Brown Park 1 DECISION HISTORY A letter was sent to Councillor Frances Nunziata from Mike Colle who is the MPP for Eglinton Lawrence who proposed to name the park located on the north side of Eglinton Avenue near Jane Street in honour of Fergy Brown, to recognize his many years of service to the former Borough and City of York. MMP Mike Colle offered his support if required and offered to submit a letter outlining some of Fergy’s accomplishments throughout his political career.
    [Show full text]
  • West Don Lands Affordable Housing
    Mill & Cherry Streets TE19.5.10 West Don Lands – Blocks 3, 4 and 7 West DonDon Lands Lands Affordable Affordable Housing Housing Lands Program Dream Kilmer Tricon selected to enter into a year land lease ith Infrastructure Ontario. Financing by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation through the Rental Construction Financing (RCFI) program. Affordable Units exempt from municipal fees through the City of Toronto's Open Doors Program. 0% of the units as affordable rental housing in a range of units sies (R to R) -50% Units 00% AMR -0% Units 0% AMR -0% Units 0% AMR View of WDL Block 8 from the Distillery District (currently under construction) 2 West Don Lands Blocks 3, 4 and 7 CORKTOWN COMMON BLOCK 8 BLOCK 20 3 West Don Lands History Municipal Planning Context West Don Lands Block Revised Block King-Parliament Central Waterfront Plan & Urban Design Plan & Plan of Secondary Plan Secondary Plan Guidelines Subdivision Downtown Plan 1996 2002 2003 2005 2006 2011 2019 West Don Lands Precinct City of Toronto Official West Don Lands Public Draft Secondary Plan Plan Plan Realm Master Plan Update Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 4 The Precinct Plan West Don Lands History Queen Street The West Don Lands is designed to nourish families in all phases of life. A variety of housing options and community services will suit a River Street broad market segment and enable residents to be comfortably St. Lawrence Street accommodated from youth to senior years. Class EA Master Plan (2005) Block Plan and Urban Design Guidelines (2006) sign associates 1 Family-Oriented Housing King Street An affordable mix of housing for families will include 20% of the total units for affordable rental housing.
    [Show full text]
  • 12, 2016 in Toronto, Ontario
    Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l’Ontario ISSUE DATE: August 30, 2016 CASE NO(S).: PL130885 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(24) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Appellant: 1026046 Ontario Limited Subject: Proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 197 Municipality: City of Toronto OMB Case No.: PL130885 OMB File No.: PL130885 OMB Case Name: Shoreline Towers Incorporated v. Toronto (City) Heard: November 6 – 27, 2015 and February 2 – 12, 2016 in Toronto, Ontario APPEARANCES: Parties Counsel/Representative* Shoreline Towers Inc. P. Patterson, P. Morley City of Toronto S. Haniford, L. Forder Lakeshore Planning Council Corp. Peggy Moulder* Mimico Lakeshore Network Inc. Dr. Martin Gerwin* Participants Abbe Edelson Mary Bella South Beach Investments Limited W. Friedman, A. Andrzejewska Vinen Atlantic S.A. R. Kanter 2 PL130885 DECISION OF THE BOARD DELIVERED BY M. C. DENHEZ 1. INTRODUCTION [1] This Official Plan (“OP”) dispute involved a new multi-billion-dollar vision for over a kilometre of Toronto’s urban waterfront. [2] "Mimico-by-the-Lake" (the “Study Area"), so named by the City of Toronto ("the City"), faces a southward bend in Lake Ontario west of the Humber River and Mimico Creek. The shore, running north-south at that point, has a strip of reclaimed parkland crossed by the Martin Goodman Trail ("the trail"). The Study Area straddles Lake Shore Boulevard West, and extends to the trail. Its visually strategic location is southwest of an existing kilometre-long redevelopment – Humber Bay Shores (formerly part of "the Motel Strip" between Lake Ontario and the Gardiner Expressway), called the Study Area’s “fraternal twin” which is subject to its own vetted planning documents.
    [Show full text]