DOCSLIB.ORG

The Art of Wise Giving™ of CANADA About This Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Art of Wise Giving™ of CANADA About This Report RONTO ONE OF COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS The Art of Wise Giving™ OF CANADA About This Report About the Toronto Foundation Established in 1981, the Toronto Foundation is one of 191 Community Foundations in Canada. We are a leading independent charitable foundation that connects philanthropy to community needs and opportunities. Our individual and family Fundholders support causes they care about in Toronto and across Canada, through grants to any registered Canadian charity. We currently have more than 500 active Funds, including endowments and assets under administration of more than $300 million. A growing number of Torontonians support the Vital Toronto Fund, our community endowment that helps mobilize people and resources to tackle community challenges in innovative and inspiring ways. To find out more, please visitwww.torontofoundation.ca About the Report The Foundation partners with many researchers to produce the Toronto’s Vital Signs® Report. The Report is compiled from current statistics and studies, identifying progress we should be proud of and challenges that need to be addressed. It is a consolidated snapshot of the trends and issues affecting the quality of life in our city and each of the interconnected issue areas is critical to the wellbeing of Toronto and its residents. Citations at the end of the Report, and live web links throughout, will take you directly to the sources used in this year’s Report. The Report aims to inspire civic engagement and provide focus for public debate. It is used by residents, businesses, community organizations, universities and colleges, and government departments. In addition, the Report is a model now being used for strategic planning by cities around the world. Your guide for discussion and action As you read through this Report, consider the Vital Questions posed throughout. We have lots to be proud of, but there are also things we need to think about in order to shift some troubling trends. Ask yourself: • What issues do you care about? • What data surprises you? • Have you been inspired to act? Please share your thoughts by filling-out a short online survey at www.torontofoundation.ca About the Community Knowledge Centre At www.ckc.torontofoundation.ca you will find an online showcase of more than 250 organizations working on solutions to the issues identified in this Report. Through video and prose, it presents stories of innovations taking place in our city and provides you with an opportunity to get involved. At the end of each issue area section in this Report, you will find lists and descriptions of groups that are addressing the trends and data reported through their innovative community-based programs. Live web links connect you to their profiles on the Community Knowledge Centre. About Community Foundations Community Foundations are independent public foundations that strengthen their communities by partnering with donors to build permanent endowments, which support community projects, and by providing leadership on issues of broad community concern. Community Foundations of Canada coordinates the nation-wide Vital Signs project, which measures the vitality of our communities, identifies significant trends, and supports action on issues that are critical to our quality of life. Since the first Vital Signs® publication was published by the Toronto Foundation in 2001, the Report has been adopted by 49 communities across Canada and by 17 communities internationally across 6 countries and 4 continents. Understanding this Report: 1. “Toronto” or “the city” refers to the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, which consisted of the former municipalities of Toronto, Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, York and the Borough of East York. “The City of Toronto” or “City” refers to the municipal government. The “Province” refers to the Ontario provincial government. 2. The “Toronto Region” or “Region” refers to the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area (CMA), the largest metropolitan area in Canada, stretching from Ajax and Pickering on the east, to Milton on the west and Tecumseth and Georgina on the north. Almost half the population of the Toronto Region resides in the city of Toronto. The Toronto Region is an area slightly smaller than the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) and is comprised of the city of Toronto plus 23 other municipalities: Ajax, Aurora, Bradford-West Gwillimbury, Brampton, Caledon, East Gwillimbury, Georgina, Georgina Island, Halton Hills, King Township, Markham, Milton, Mississauga, Mono Township, Newmarket, Tecumseth, Oakville, Orangeville, Pickering, Richmond Hill, Uxbridge, Whitchurch-Stouffville and Vaughan. 3. The Greater Toronto Area (GTA) refers to the entire area covered by the Region of Halton, Region of Peel, Region of York, Region of Durham and city of Toronto. The area is slightly larger than the Toronto CMA. 4. The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) refers to the GTA region and the City of Hamilton – a combined population of more than 6.5 million people. Source: City of Toronto, Toronto Economic Development and Culture. The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) 5. The Report is divided into 12 sections for ease of reference. However, each issue area is intimately connected to all the others. Readers will discover the plethora of examples, such as indicators dealing with “walkability” and diabetes in the Health and Wellness section, illustrating the connection between active transportation and health, and employment as well as demographics data in the section on Leadership, Civic Engagement and Belonging, pointing to linkages between leadership representation, voting patterns, and sense of belonging. 6. Throughout the Report, there are a number of Vital Questions raised. These questions are intended to stimulate your own questions, and act as a catalyst for reflection, conversation and action. 7. Links to organizations directly cited are included in relevant indicators. Citations are made at the end of each indicator (which may contain several bulleted points). 8. Ideas and Innovations that point the way forward for Toronto are identified with the following icon: 9. See Glossary at the back of this document for a list of definitions. 10. This Report occasionally uses data from the Statistics Canada 2011 National Household Survey (NHS). The NHS excludes a portion of the 2006 (and earlier) census population, and data were collected in a voluntary survey, making the results vulnerable to non-response bias. As a result, NHS data cannot be compared reliably with those from earlier Census releases. Comparisons with previous census periods should be considered with caution. 11. In this year’s Toronto’s Vital Signs Report, we have included a précis at the start of each issue area. They list some of the key indicators we look to year after year to help us understand where Toronto is making progress and where there has been decline, along with summary comments that speak to why the data is important, and what some of the key trends and new findings are. Further detail is provided in the text that follows, along with indicators from relevant recent research and occasional reports. 12. To ensure clarity and accuracy of the data being presented, we have opted to use the same terminology used in the research and studies referenced. As a result, there may be instances throughout the Report where inconsistent terminology is used to describe the same thing. 13. The Toronto’s Vital Signs Report 2014 draws particular attention to data, ideas and innovations that come from outside Canada to help provide international context for interpreting Toronto’s experience. Throughout the Report, global data, ideas and innovations are identified with the following icon: 14. In Toronto’s Vital Signs Report 2014 we have included several “community snapshots” in each of the issue areas to give you a sense of the statistics at the level of some of Toronto’s 140 neighbourhoods, using data garnered from the City of Toronto’s award-winning website Wellbeing Toronto, as well as other sources, as cited in the text. The Wellbeing Toronto website contains a wealth of data across 11 different issue areas. The site’s maps also allow you to locate services and public institutions across Toronto such as libraries, shelters, settlement agencies and community gardens. To access data for your own neighbourhood or to compare neighbourhoods across the city, just follow the link: http://www.toronto.ca/wellbeing/. Toronto’s Vital Signs® Report 2014 message from John Barford and Rahul K. Bhardwaj It’s about time. Toronto, it’s about time we stopped asking ourselves whether we’re a world-class city; we’re near the top of the class. The Economist has declared Toronto the fourth most livable city in the world for the sixth year in a row. We were named the 2014 Intelligent Community of the Year by the Intelligent Community Forum, recognized as the Youthful City of the Year by the YouthfulCities Index, and we continue to rank highly on many leading international indices. What does it take to be world class? It helps to be recognized as a good place to do business. Toronto is the most tax competitive of 51 international cities, one of the least expensive places in the world to do business, and we’ve been ranked third among 422 metro areas in the Americas for attractiveness in business investment. Construction, considered a key indicator of economic vitality, is strong. This spring, 147 high- and mid-rise buildings were under construction in Toronto, more than in any other North American city. The Toronto Region’s importance in the national jobs landscape has been growing since the financial crisis of 2008. Almost one in three jobs created in Canada between 2010 and 2013 was in the Region. Our cultural economy is booming, too. Toronto’s creative workforce has grown 34 per cent since 2001, more than twice the rate of the overall labour force. Arts and culture contribute $11.3 billion annually to the city’s GDP; in 2013, film, television, and other screen-based media production spending exceeded $1 billion for the third year in a row.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 153-185 Eastern Avenue, City of Toronto (Former Dominion Wheel and Foundries Company) B80086 No
    HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 153-185 Eastern Avenue, City of Toronto (Former Dominion Wheel and Foundries Company) B80086 No. 153 Eastern Avenue B81484 No. 169 Eastern Avenue B80102 No. 171 Eastern Avenue B80129 No. 185 Eastern Avenue Site Plan, 2021 (SBA) Prepared for Infrastructure Ontario (IO) FINAL June 24th 2021 Client: Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation 1 Dundas Street West, Suite 2000 Toronto ON M5G 1Z3 Authors: Jane Burgess, OAA, CAHP, MRAIC, APT Stevens Burgess Architects Ltd. 204-120 Carlton Street Toronto ON M5A 4K2 [email protected] 416-961-5690 Julia Rady, PhD Stevens Burgess Architects Ltd. 204-120 Carlton Street Toronto ON M5A 4K2 [email protected] 416-961-5690 Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) 153-185 Eastern Avenue, Toronto Table of Contents Executive Summary Confirmation of Ministry or Prescribed Public Body Review and Acceptance of Recommendations 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value.................................................................................................11 3. Assessment of Existing Conditions...................................................................................................... 14 4. Description and Purpose of Proposed Activity ................................................................................... 18 5. Impact Assessment ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Connections: Urban Forestry and Toronto's West
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Érudit Article "Constructing connections: urban forestry and Toronto’s West Don Lands revitalization" Paul L. Nichols Environnement Urbain / Urban Environment, vol. 3, 2009, p. 83-93. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/037602ar DOI: 10.7202/037602ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 12 février 2017 04:38 Dossier thématique Urbanisme et développement durable Urban planning and sustainable development Special Issue CONSTRUCTING CONNECTIONS: URBAN FORESTRY AND TORONTO’S WEST DON LANDS REVITALIZATION Paul L. NICHOLS RÉSUMÉ Les West Don Lands ont joué un rôle de premier plan dans l’histoire de Toronto. Du milieu du dix-neuvième siècle jusqu’au milieu du vingtième siècle cette zone est connue comme centre industriel. Aujourd’hui, force est de constater que le quartier subit les conséquences négatives de la désindustrialisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimson White
    CW's opinions Music students to show Tide baseball too biased opera talent this weekend edges Blazers OPINIONS, Page 4 THE SCENE, Page 12 SPORTS, Page 6 Thursday, April 6, 2006 Serving the University of Alabama since 1894 Vol. 112, Issue 111 Prof remembered for enthusiasm Weaver is remembered by Weaver’s daughter, Valerie his geography instruction,” Former geography chair- students, family members and Weaver, said her father had Webster said. man was ‘wonderful colleagues for his friendliness an interest in gardening and Webster said he will always and his passion for geography. loved working in his yard. remember Weaver as a great man,’ colleague says Weaver was the longest- He also enjoyed teaching his friend and colleague and is BY WESLEY HALLMAN serving member of the geog- students and participating in saddened by his death. Staff Reporter raphy department, Webster K-12 teaching institutes about “He was an absolutely won- ■ [email protected] said. Weaver was an instru- geography, she said. derful man,” Webster said. “He mental member of the depart- “He enjoyed teaching his was always here and for him David Weaver, a geogra- ment, Webster said. geography of the national to be gone is almost unimagi- phy professor who served as “Serving as chair of the parks classes the most,” Valerie nable.” chairman of the department department can be exhaust- said. Weaver’s students said they for 13 years, died Monday. He ing, and for him to serve for 13 Weaver took pride in helping will remember Weaver for his was 63. years was quite a feat,” Webster K-12 teachers in the state learn friendly smile and willingness Weaver drowned in Lake said.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 AR Summary 3.15 Waterfront Toronto
    Waterfront Toronto 2018 Value-for-Money Audit Why We Did This Audit Why It Matters • Waterfront Toronto was created under provincial legislation— • Land in Toronto’s waterfront is owned by public and private the Toronto Revitalization Corporation Act, 2002—to oversee interests. Successful revitalization depends on a co-ordinated and lead the revitalization of Toronto’s waterfront. Our Office and well-planned approach. has not previously audited Waterfront Toronto. • Federal, provincial and municipal governments committed • There is strong public interest in the revitalization of Toronto’s $1.5 billion in 2002 for waterfront revitalization and waterfront. $1.25 billion in 2018 for Port Lands flood protection. • Planning for large real-estate development while balancing the • Waterfront Toronto’s Quayside project with Sidewalk Labs interests of three levels of government creates complexity and raises concerns in areas including digital governance (for risks in areas such as project selection, project management example, data security and privacy) that will significantly and the procurement of developers and partners. impact the public. What We Found Mandate • Waterfront Toronto was not given the authority to ensure that the revitalization of Toronto’s waterfront is done right. As a result, the development of waterfront lands has continued to be largely driven by historical practices, existing bylaws, and other regulations governing commercial and residential development. • Waterfront Toronto has directly developed only 5% (55 acres) of the publicly owned developable waterfront land and provided funding to other organizations for revitalization of another 14% (151 acres) since its inception in 2002. • Other waterfront development entities in other cities were given greater authority than what Waterfront Toronto had regarding restriction of building heights, creation of large public spaces and public access to the water’s edge, and the right to expropriate in cases where the intended use was not consistent with overall revitalization plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing up Getting Competitive
    TORONTO EDITION FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 2013 Vol. 17 • No. 15 Tall building design guidelines update Convention venue needed downtown GROWING UP GETTING By Jake Tobin Garrett COMPETITIVE Anyone watching the city’s skyline over the past 10 years By John Michael McGrath would have noticed it has gotten both increasingly crowded and taller. Th is bourgeoning tall building environment brings new design challenges and opportunities that the city hopes Toronto needs a new, large, convention space according to to address in an update to its tall building design guidelines, respected people in the industry—and it needs one downtown, which were adopted at planning and growth management not at Exhibition Place. committee yesterday. Toronto “absolutely” needs a newer, larger convention “It’s been an incredible laboratory for studying tall buildings space says Lyle Hall, managing director at HLT Advisory— because we’re building more tall buildings than most cities in “unequivocally.” Hall is one of the leading consultants in the the world,” city urban design director Robert Freedman told hotel and tourism industry, and his research informed city NRU. “Th ere’s been a huge amount of change and certainly a manager Joe Pennachetti’s recent report. Th e key issue, says huge number of towers added to the city as these guidelines Hall, is Toronto’s lack of “contiguous space,” meaning a single have evolved.” large exhibit space for the large events that have the greatest Since the guidelines were put in place in 2006, the city has economic impact. received 290 tall building applications, he said, adding that “It’s virtually impossible to rent the Metro Toronto many of those were for multiple towers, so the actual number Convention Centre to one customer to use both sides,” is larger.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line
    EX9.1 Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line As directed by City Council in April 2019, City and TTC staff have assessed the Province’s proposed Ontario Line. The details of this assessment are provided in this attachment. 1. Project Summary 1.1. Project Description The Ontario Line was included as part of the 2019 Ontario Budget1 as a transit project that will cover similar study areas as the Relief Line South and North, as well as a western extension. The proposed project is a 15.5-kilometre higher-order transit line with 15 stations, connecting from Exhibition GO station to Line 5 at Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, near the Science Centre station, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Ontario Line Proposal (source: Metrolinx IBC) Since April 2019, technical working groups comprising staff from the City, TTC, Metrolinx, Infrastructure Ontario and the Ministry of Transportation met regularly to understand alignment and station location options being considered for the Ontario 1 http://budget.ontario.ca/2019/contents.html Attachment 4 - Assessment of Ontario Line Page 1 of 20 Line. Discussions also considered fleet requirements, infrastructure design criteria, and travel demand modelling. Metrolinx prepared an Initial Business Case (IBC) that was publicly posted on July 25, 2019.2 The IBC compared the Ontario Line and Relief Line South projects against a Business As Usual scenario. The general findings by Metrolinx were that "both Relief Line South and Ontario Line offer significant improvements compared to a Business As Usual scenario, generating $3.4 billion and $7.4 billion worth of economic benefits, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Dynamic and Diverse Communities
    3 (1) PUBLIC REALM IN THE EAST BAYFRONT (2) PUBLIC REALM ALONG THE DON ROADWAY (3) 20 NIAGARA STREET, KING-SPADINA (4) NATIONAL TRADE CENTRE AT EXHIBITION PLACE (5) RESTORED QUEENS QUAY TERMINAL BUILDING (6) MIMICO PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 1 4 (7) VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE PARK 5 6 2 7 D) CREATING DYNAMIC AND DIVERSE NEW COMMUNITIES The fourth and final principle of the Plan is focused on the creation of dynamic and D21_A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE WEST DON LANDS diverse waterfront communities – unique places of beauty, quality and opportunity for With the construction of the flood protection berm and the naturalization The National Trade Centre will continue to function as a magnet to attract all citizens. New waterfront communities will be acclaimed for their high degree of social, of the mouth of the Don River, the West Don Lands will be redeveloped new businesses and support facilities. Synergies may also be created by economic, natural and environmental health and cultural vibrancy, which collectively will into diverse mixed-use communities. These communities will capitalize the presence of the new media businesses of Liberty Village. on their strategic downtown location, the synergy created by the simulta- contribute to the long-term sustainability of the area and the entire city. The following The remade Exhibition Place will feature a world-class public open neous development of the Port Lands and their historic roots as part of the “Big Moves” implement this principle: plaza capable of hosting large gatherings and festivals. original town of York, as well as the Don River’s new environmental health.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Don River West Lower Don River West BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Lower Don River West Environmental Study Report Remedial Flood Protection Project BIBLIOGRAPHY Acres & Associated-July 1996, Scoping and Sensitivity Analysis on Flood Protection Options for West Don Lands Site, prepared for ORC. Acres Consulting Services Limited, March 1983, Keating Channel Environmental Assessment, Main Report. Acres Consulting, March 1983, Keating Channel Environmental Assessment Appendix F – Economic Studies. Acres International, March 2004, LDRW Remedial Flood Protection Works Geoenvironmental Information Gap Analysis West Bank – Draft. Agra Earth & Environmental, June 10, 1996, Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Restoration of the East Bank of the Don River between Lakeshore Boulevard and the CNR Bridge. Angus Environmental Ltd., March 1995, 1995 Assessment of the Environmental Data for the Ataratiri Lands prepared for: Waterfront Regeneration Trust. Archaeological Resource Management Unit, TRCA, January 2004, Draft Cultural Heritage Study for the Environmental Assessment for the Naturalization & Flood Protection for the Lower Don River. Archaeological Services Inc., April 2004, Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of the East Bayfront, West Donlands and Portlands Areas, City of Toronto. Barrett, Suzanne, James Flagal, Beth Jefferson, Karlk Konze and Ed Mickiewicz, March 1990, Environmental Audit of the Port Industrial Lands and East Bayfront, Natural Heritage, Second Draft. Beak Consultants Ltd and Raven Beck Environmental Ltd., April 1994, Lower Don Lands Site Characterization and Remedial Options Study. C.K. Hurst, April 1978, Dredging and Disposal of Dredged Material from the Keating Channel, Toronto. CH2M Hill, MacViro, July 2003, City of Toronto, Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan, Combine System Sewershed Final Report. City of Toronto, Bring Back the Don, www.toronto.ca/don. City of Toronto, Obtained 10/16/03, Sustainability and Council’s Strategic Plan, from: www.city.toronto.on.ca/sustainability/strategic_plan.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway to the Port Lands Fact Sheet
    BANNER IMAGE COURTESY OF WATERFRONT TORONTO FACT SHEET GATEWAY TO THE PORT LANDS VILLIERS ISLAND PRECINCT, TORONTO GEOGRAPHY Downtown Toronto’s Eastern Waterfront (a 30-minute walk from Union Station) SITE AREA 88 acres (54 developable, 34 water’s edge parks and public spaces) DEVELOPMENT TYPE Mixed-use (residential, office, retail) NEW BUILDINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IMAGE COURTESY OF WATERFRONT TORONTO Tallest buildings ranging from 26 to 29 Making of an Island storeys Abutting the future location of Google’s planned “Smart City” (Sidewalk Toronto), Villiers Island will be the first area in the Port TIMELINE (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) Lands to undergo redevelopment. The existing industrial port will Infrastructure in place by 2024; ongoing be transformed into a connected and complete mixed-use island development and build-out to 2040 community. DEVELOPERS Waterfront Toronto & private-sector development partners Partnership. Performance. AVISON YOUNG Partnership. Performance. GATEWAY TO THE PORT LANDS – VILLIERS ISLAND PRECINCT, TORONTO FACT SHEET TIME TO RENEW TORONTO’S PORT LANDS With developable land in short supply, the Port Lands, at more than 800 acres, offers vast potential to provide relief to Toronto’s perpetually crowded downtown. The Villiers Island Precinct (formerly referred to as Cousins Quay) is planned to be a complete mixed-use waterfront community – the first redevelopment venture into the Port Lands. The creation of an island through flood protection measures (the naturalization of the mouth of the Don River) will establish a mixed-use community surrounded by parks and naturalized spaces where the river flows into Lake Ontario. TORONTO FINANCIAL CORE QUAYSIDE VILLIERS ISLAND PRECINCT PORT LANDS EAST BAYFRONT WEST DON LANDS EAST HARBOUR » Villiers Island Precinct Plan was instated in September 2017 to guide the development of the new island community.
    [Show full text]
  • West Don Lands Affordable Housing
    Mill & Cherry Streets TE19.5.10 West Don Lands – Blocks 3, 4 and 7 West DonDon Lands Lands Affordable Affordable Housing Housing Lands Program Dream Kilmer Tricon selected to enter into a year land lease ith Infrastructure Ontario. Financing by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation through the Rental Construction Financing (RCFI) program. Affordable Units exempt from municipal fees through the City of Toronto's Open Doors Program. 0% of the units as affordable rental housing in a range of units sies (R to R) -50% Units 00% AMR -0% Units 0% AMR -0% Units 0% AMR View of WDL Block 8 from the Distillery District (currently under construction) 2 West Don Lands Blocks 3, 4 and 7 CORKTOWN COMMON BLOCK 8 BLOCK 20 3 West Don Lands History Municipal Planning Context West Don Lands Block Revised Block King-Parliament Central Waterfront Plan & Urban Design Plan & Plan of Secondary Plan Secondary Plan Guidelines Subdivision Downtown Plan 1996 2002 2003 2005 2006 2011 2019 West Don Lands Precinct City of Toronto Official West Don Lands Public Draft Secondary Plan Plan Plan Realm Master Plan Update Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 4 The Precinct Plan West Don Lands History Queen Street The West Don Lands is designed to nourish families in all phases of life. A variety of housing options and community services will suit a River Street broad market segment and enable residents to be comfortably St. Lawrence Street accommodated from youth to senior years. Class EA Master Plan (2005) Block Plan and Urban Design Guidelines (2006) sign associates 1 Family-Oriented Housing King Street An affordable mix of housing for families will include 20% of the total units for affordable rental housing.
    [Show full text]
  • 12, 2016 in Toronto, Ontario
    Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l’Ontario ISSUE DATE: August 30, 2016 CASE NO(S).: PL130885 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(24) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Appellant: 1026046 Ontario Limited Subject: Proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 197 Municipality: City of Toronto OMB Case No.: PL130885 OMB File No.: PL130885 OMB Case Name: Shoreline Towers Incorporated v. Toronto (City) Heard: November 6 – 27, 2015 and February 2 – 12, 2016 in Toronto, Ontario APPEARANCES: Parties Counsel/Representative* Shoreline Towers Inc. P. Patterson, P. Morley City of Toronto S. Haniford, L. Forder Lakeshore Planning Council Corp. Peggy Moulder* Mimico Lakeshore Network Inc. Dr. Martin Gerwin* Participants Abbe Edelson Mary Bella South Beach Investments Limited W. Friedman, A. Andrzejewska Vinen Atlantic S.A. R. Kanter 2 PL130885 DECISION OF THE BOARD DELIVERED BY M. C. DENHEZ 1. INTRODUCTION [1] This Official Plan (“OP”) dispute involved a new multi-billion-dollar vision for over a kilometre of Toronto’s urban waterfront. [2] "Mimico-by-the-Lake" (the “Study Area"), so named by the City of Toronto ("the City"), faces a southward bend in Lake Ontario west of the Humber River and Mimico Creek. The shore, running north-south at that point, has a strip of reclaimed parkland crossed by the Martin Goodman Trail ("the trail"). The Study Area straddles Lake Shore Boulevard West, and extends to the trail. Its visually strategic location is southwest of an existing kilometre-long redevelopment – Humber Bay Shores (formerly part of "the Motel Strip" between Lake Ontario and the Gardiner Expressway), called the Study Area’s “fraternal twin” which is subject to its own vetted planning documents.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 National Charter Schools Conference Attendee Roster June 3, 2018
    2018 National Charter Schools Conference Attendee Roster June 3, 2018 Ben Aase Lehua Abrigo CliftonLarsonAllen Board Member, Ka Waihona O Ka Naauao-Pcs Minneapolis, MN Waianae, HI Jason Abate Erin Abshere Management, National Heritage Academies Policy/Advocacy, CCSA Grand Rapids, MI Sacramento, CA Matt Abbott Bridgett Abston WorkMonger Authorizer, Indiana Charter School Board Austin, TX Indianapolis, IN Nadine Abraham Shea Ace COO/operations, City on a Hill Charter Public Community Relations, Lehigh Valley Academy Schools Regional Charter School Roxbury, MA Bethlehem, PA Sussan Abraham Juan Acevedo Curriculum Specialist, Legacy Preparatory School Leader(principal,dean,CEO,director,etc), Dallas, TX LEAD Charter School Newark, NJ Twyla Abraham Student Activities Coordinator, Linwood Public Jason Acosta Charter School Cardinal McCloskey Shreveport, LA Bronx, NY Yaneisy Abreu Bryce Adams Lead Teacher, Theodore R. & Thelma A. Gibson VP of State Relations, Pearson Charter School Columbia, MD Miami, FL NCSC18 Attendee Roster 6- 3 - 18 | 2 David Adams Veronica Aguilar George K. Baum & Company Deputy Director of School Policy, A for Arizona Pittsburgh, PA Phoenix, AZ Dborah Adams Roy Aguillon Board Member, Youth Empowerment Services, Board Member, Lighthouse Charter School Inc District San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX Debra Adams Erika Aguirre Board Member, Robert Russa Moton TEQlease Education Finance Elementary School Calabasas, CA New Orleans, LA Sukhi Ahluwalia Diedra Adams Attorney, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Gateway Charter Academy
    [Show full text]